hummbl-bibliography 1.0.0

package/bibliography/T3_applied.bib

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+@book{Ries2011LeanStartup,
+  title = {The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses},
+  author = {Ries, Eric},
+  year = {2011},
+  publisher = {Crown Business},
+  isbn = {978-0307887894},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This influential work introduces the Lean Startup methodology, a systematic approach to developing businesses and products that aims to shorten product development cycles and rapidly discover if a proposed business model is viable. Ries draws on his experience in the startup world to present key concepts including the Build-Measure-Learn feedback loop, validated learning, and innovation accounting. The book challenges traditional business planning with its emphasis on rapid experimentation, iterative product releases, and customer feedback. Key principles include the importance of developing a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), using split testing, and engaging in continuous deployment. The methodology has been widely adopted beyond tech startups, influencing corporate innovation, government agencies, and educational institutions. The book provides practical tools for entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs to test their vision continuously, adapt and adjust before any large investment, and understand when to pivot or persevere.},
+  keywords = {lean startup, innovation, entrepreneurship, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:DE}
+}
+
+@book{Brown2009ChangeByDesign,
+  title = {Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation},
+  author = {Brown, Tim},
+  year = {2009},
+  publisher = {Harper Business},
+  isbn = {978-0061766084},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This book presents a powerful framework for driving innovation through design thinking, a human-centered approach to problem-solving that integrates the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success. Brown, CEO of the renowned design firm IDEO, demonstrates how design thinking goes beyond traditional aesthetics to become a systematic approach to organizational transformation. The book outlines key principles including empathy for end-users, the value of prototyping, and the importance of storytelling in the innovation process. Brown introduces the concept of 'T-shaped' people—those who combine deep expertise in one area with broad interdisciplinary skills. Through case studies from healthcare, technology, and social innovation, the book shows how design thinking can be applied to complex challenges at all levels of an organization. The methodology emphasizes observation, ideation, and iterative testing, providing a structured yet flexible approach to creating innovative solutions that are both technically feasible and commercially viable.},
+  keywords = {design thinking, innovation, prototyping, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:RE}
+}
+
+@book{Kim2013PhoenixProject,
+  title = {The Phoenix Project: A Novel about IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win},
+  author = {Kim, Gene and Behr, Kevin and Spafford, George},
+  year = {2013},
+  publisher = {IT Revolution Press},
+  isbn = {978-0988262508},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; IT Revolution Press does not register DOIs
+  abstract = {This influential business novel uses a compelling story to illustrate the principles of DevOps and its impact on organizational performance. Through the narrative of an IT manager struggling to save a failing project, the book introduces the Three Ways: 1) Systems Thinking, which emphasizes the performance of the entire system over individual work; 2) Amplifying Feedback Loops, which focuses on creating and responding to all feedback; and 3) Culture of Continual Experimentation, which fosters risk-taking and learning from failures. The book demonstrates how these principles, inspired by lean manufacturing and the Toyota Production System, can transform IT operations and software development. Key concepts include the importance of making work visible, limiting work in progress, reducing batch sizes, and creating a culture of continuous improvement. The novel has become a foundational text in the DevOps movement, offering practical insights for improving collaboration between development and operations teams to achieve business goals.},
+  keywords = {DevOps, systems thinking, IT management, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:CO}
+}
+
+@book{Kotter1996Leading,
+  title = {Leading Change},
+  author = {Kotter, John P.},
+  year = {1996},
+  publisher = {Harvard Business Review Press},
+  isbn = {978-0875847474},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Kotter synthesizes decades of research on organizational transformation into an eight-step process for leading change: establishing urgency, creating a guiding coalition, developing a vision and strategy, communicating the change vision, empowering broad-based action, generating short-term wins, consolidating gains and producing more change, and anchoring new approaches in the culture. The book's central argument is that most change efforts fail not from poor strategy but from poor execution of the human dimensions of change -- particularly the failure to create sufficient urgency and to build a coalition powerful enough to overcome institutional inertia. Kotter distinguishes between management (planning, budgeting, organizing, controlling) and leadership (establishing direction, aligning people, motivating and inspiring), arguing that successful transformation requires both but that most organizations are over-managed and under-led. The eight-step model has become the most widely referenced change management framework in organizational development. For the HUMMBL framework, the model exemplifies recursive application: each step creates the conditions for the next, and the process itself must be continuously monitored and adjusted -- a feedback loop where the output of one transformation phase becomes the input to the next.},
+  keywords = {change management, organizational transformation, leadership, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:P}
+}
+
+@book{Heath2007MadeToStick,
+  title = {Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die},
+  author = {Heath, Chip and Heath, Dan},
+  year = {2007},
+  publisher = {Random House},
+  isbn = {978-1400064281},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {The Heath brothers identify six principles that make ideas memorable and persuasive, captured in the acronym SUCCESs: Simple (find the core message), Unexpected (violate expectations to capture attention), Concrete (use sensory language and specific examples), Credible (establish believability through authorities, anti-authorities, or testable credentials), Emotional (make people feel something), and Stories (provide mental simulation and inspiration). The book draws on cognitive psychology research including the curse of knowledge (experts struggle to communicate with non-experts because they cannot un-know what they know), schema theory (sticky ideas connect to existing mental frameworks), and the gap theory of curiosity (people pay attention when they perceive a gap between what they know and what they want to know). Each principle is illustrated with case studies from urban legends, advertising campaigns, public health initiatives, and organizational communication. The framework provides a diagnostic tool for why communication fails and a constructive method for making any idea stickier. For the HUMMBL framework, the book demonstrates how ideas compose into memorable wholes -- the SUCCESs framework itself being a composition of six independent principles that together produce communication impact greater than any individual principle.},
+  keywords = {communication, storytelling, memory, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:P}
+}
+
+@book{Thaler2008Nudge,
+  title = {Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness},
+  author = {Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R.},
+  year = {2008},
+  publisher = {Yale University Press},
+  isbn = {978-0300122237},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Thaler and Sunstein introduce the concept of ``choice architecture'' -- the deliberate design of contexts in which people make decisions -- and argue that small, low-cost changes to how options are presented can dramatically improve outcomes without restricting freedom of choice. They call this approach ``libertarian paternalism'': preserving choice while steering people toward better decisions through defaults, framing, feedback, and option mapping. Key mechanisms include default options (organ donation opt-out vs. opt-in), feedback systems (energy usage comparisons with neighbors), and structured choice sequences (cafeteria food placement). The book distinguishes between Econs (the rational actors of economic theory) and Humans (real people subject to status quo bias, loss aversion, anchoring, and present bias), arguing that policy and system design should account for how Humans actually behave rather than how Econs theoretically should. The framework has influenced policy worldwide, from the UK's Behavioural Insights Team to retirement savings programs. For the HUMMBL framework, nudging is a form of inversion: rather than mandating behavior through constraints, it works by understanding how defaults and framing invert the effort required for desired vs. undesired outcomes.},
+  keywords = {behavioral economics, choice architecture, decision making, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:CO}
+}
+
+@book{Duhigg2012PowerOfHabit,
+  title = {The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business},
+  author = {Duhigg, Charles},
+  year = {2012},
+  publisher = {Random House},
+  isbn = {978-0812981605},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This groundbreaking work explores the science of habit formation and how understanding the habit loop—cue, routine, reward—can transform personal lives, businesses, and societies. Duhigg presents a comprehensive framework for understanding how habits work, drawing on cutting-edge research in neuroscience and psychology. The book is structured around three main sections: individual habits, organizational habits, and societal habits. Key concepts include the 'Golden Rule of Habit Change' (keeping the same cue and reward while changing the routine) and the importance of keystone habits that trigger widespread change. Through compelling case studies from corporate America, professional sports, and social movements, Duhigg demonstrates how habits shape success and how they can be deliberately modified. The book provides practical strategies for individuals seeking personal improvement and leaders aiming to transform organizational culture, making it an essential read for anyone interested in behavior change and personal development.},
+  keywords = {habits, behavior change, neuroscience, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+@book{Collins2001GoodToGreat,
+  title = {Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't},
+  author = {Collins, Jim},
+  year = {2001},
+  publisher = {Harper Business},
+  isbn = {978-0066620992},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Collins and a research team of 21 spent five years studying companies that made the transition from sustained mediocrity to sustained excellence, comparing each against a matched control company that failed to make the same leap. The study identifies a consistent pattern across all good-to-great companies: Level 5 Leadership (humble but fiercely determined leaders), First Who Then What (getting the right people before setting strategy), the Hedgehog Concept (understanding the intersection of passion, capability, and economic engine), the Flywheel Effect (consistent pushing in a single direction creates momentum), and a Culture of Discipline (freedom within a framework of responsibility). The research method -- identifying dramatic performance transitions and working backward to find common causal factors -- is itself a decomposition strategy: breaking down the complex phenomenon of organizational excellence into testable components. The Hedgehog Concept in particular requires inversion thinking: understanding what you should NOT do is as important as understanding what you should do. Collins's ``stop doing'' lists are a direct application of inversion to strategy.},
+  keywords = {organizational excellence, leadership, business strategy, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:IN}
+}
+
+@book{Pink2009Drive,
+  title = {Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us},
+  author = {Pink, Daniel H.},
+  year = {2009},
+  publisher = {Riverhead Books},
+  isbn = {978-1594488849},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Pink synthesizes decades of motivation research to argue that the traditional carrot-and-stick approach to motivation (Motivation 2.0) is fundamentally mismatched with the creative, conceptual work that dominates the modern economy. Drawing on Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory, he identifies three intrinsic motivators that constitute Motivation 3.0: autonomy (the desire to direct our own lives), mastery (the urge to get better at something that matters), and purpose (the yearning to do what we do in the service of something larger than ourselves). Pink demonstrates that extrinsic rewards can actually diminish performance on creative tasks -- the ``overjustification effect'' where external incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation. The book distinguishes between algorithmic tasks (following established instructions toward a single conclusion, where rewards work) and heuristic tasks (requiring experimentation and novel solutions, where autonomy and mastery drive performance). The framework provides a perspective-shifting lens: by reframing motivation through the first-person experience of the worker rather than the third-person view of the manager, it inverts the standard management assumption that control produces performance.},
+  keywords = {motivation, autonomy, purpose, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN}
+}
+
+@book{Sutherland2014Scrum,
+  title = {Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time},
+  author = {Sutherland, Jeff and Sutherland, J. J.},
+  year = {2014},
+  publisher = {Crown Business},
+  isbn = {978-0385346450},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {For those who believe that there must be a more agile and efficient way for people to get things done, here is a brilliantly discursive, thought-provoking book about the leadership and management process that is changing the way we live. In the future, historians may look back on human progress and draw a sharp line designating "before Scrum" and "after Scrum."},
+  keywords = {agile, project management, iterative development, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:CO}
+}
+
+@book{Schwartz2004Paradox,
+  title = {The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less},
+  author = {Schwartz, Barry},
+  year = {2004},
+  publisher = {Ecco},
+  isbn = {978-0060005696},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Whether we're buying a pair of jeans, ordering a cup of coffee, selecting a long-distance carrier, applying to college, choosing a doctor, or setting up a 401(k), everyday decisions—both big and small—have become increasingly complex due to the overwhelming abundance of choice with which we are presented. We assume that more choice means better options and greater satisfaction. But beware of excessive choice: choice overload can make you question the decisions you make before you even make them, it can set you up for unrealistically high expectations, and it can make you blame yourself for any and all failures.},
+  keywords = {decision making, choice overload, satisfaction, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:DE}
+}
+
+@book{Christensen1997Innovators,
+  title = {The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail},
+  author = {Christensen, Clayton M.},
+  year = {1997},
+  publisher = {Harvard Business Review Press},
+  isbn = {978-0875845852},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {The Innovator's Dilemma demonstrates why outstanding companies that had their competitive antennae up, listened astutely to customers, and invested aggressively in new technologies still lost their market dominance. Offering both successes and failures from leading companies as a guide, this book gives you a set of rules for capitalizing on the phenomenon of disruptive innovation.},
+  keywords = {disruptive innovation, business strategy, technology, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+@book{Ariely2008Predictably,
+  title = {Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions},
+  author = {Ariely, Dan},
+  year = {2008},
+  publisher = {Harper},
+  isbn = {978-0061353246},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This influential book challenges the traditional economic assumption that human beings make rational decisions. Through a series of clever and often surprising experiments, Ariely demonstrates how systematic and predictable our irrational behaviors actually are. The book explores various cognitive biases and heuristics that affect our decision-making, including the power of free offers, the influence of expectations, the effect of price on perceived value, and the impact of social norms on behavior. Ariely's research reveals that our irrational behaviors are neither random nor senseless, but rather follow predictable patterns. The book offers valuable insights for consumers, business leaders, and policymakers, showing how understanding these patterns can lead to better decision-making. By recognizing these cognitive biases, readers can make more informed choices in both personal and professional contexts, and design systems that account for human irrationality.},
+  keywords = {behavioral economics, irrationality, decision making, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:P}
+}
+
+@book{Goleman1995Emotional,
+  title = {Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ},
+  author = {Goleman, Daniel},
+  year = {1995},
+  publisher = {Bantam Books},
+  isbn = {978-0553383713},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Everyone knows that high IQ is no guarantee of success, happiness, or virtue, but until Emotional Intelligence, we could only guess why. Daniel Goleman's brilliant report from the frontiers of psychology and neuroscience offers startling new insight into our "two minds"—the rational and the emotional—and how they together shape our destiny.},
+  keywords = {emotional intelligence, self-awareness, empathy, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+@book{Gladwell2008Outliers,
+  title = {Outliers: The Story of Success},
+  author = {Gladwell, Malcolm},
+  year = {2008},
+  publisher = {Little, Brown and Company},
+  isbn = {978-0316017923},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {In this stunning new book, Malcolm Gladwell takes us on an intellectual journey through the world of "outliers"—the best and the brightest, the most famous and the most successful. He asks the question: what makes high-achievers different? His answer is that we pay too much attention to what successful people are like, and too little attention to where they are from: that is, their culture, their family, their generation, and the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing.},
+  keywords = {success, expertise, 10000-hour rule, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+@book{Davenport2018AIAdvantage,
+  title = {The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work},
+  author = {Davenport, Thomas H.},
+  year = {2018},
+  publisher = {MIT Press},
+  isbn = {978-0262039178},
+  % No DOI available -- MIT Press title; DOI not registered for this edition
+  abstract = {This pragmatic guide examines how organizations can implement AI to augment human capabilities rather than replace workers. Davenport introduces a taxonomy of AI applications: robotic process automation (automating structured tasks), cognitive insight (pattern detection in large datasets), and cognitive engagement (intelligent agents that interact with humans). Through case studies from finance, healthcare, media, and manufacturing, the book demonstrates that the most successful AI deployments enhance human decision-making rather than attempting full autonomy. Key recommendations include starting with existing business processes, combining AI with human judgment, and treating AI as a portfolio of capabilities rather than a single technology. For hummbl-dev, Davenport's augmentation thesis validates the Morning Briefing architecture: the system does not make decisions for the founder but synthesizes information from seven adapters into a decision-support artifact that amplifies the founder's pattern recognition and reduces information overload.},
+  keywords = {AI augmentation, business transformation, cognitive automation, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+@book{Agrawal2018PredictionMachines,
+  title = {Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence},
+  author = {Agrawal, Ajay and Gans, Joshua and Goldfarb, Avi},
+  year = {2018},
+  publisher = {Harvard Business Review Press},
+  isbn = {978-1633695733},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This book reframes artificial intelligence as a technology that dramatically reduces the cost of prediction, and then uses economic theory to analyze the cascading effects of cheap prediction on business strategy, organizational design, and competitive dynamics. The authors argue that as prediction becomes cheaper, the complementary inputs -- judgment, data, and action -- become more valuable. They introduce a decision-making framework decomposing decisions into prediction (what will happen), judgment (what matters), action (executing the choice), and outcome (learning from results). The book demonstrates how AI shifts the optimal boundaries of firms, changes the value of human judgment, and creates new strategic trade-offs between speed and accuracy. For hummbl-dev, this framework directly justifies the architecture: the briefing system automates prediction (synthesizing signals from GitHub, Linear, Calendar, cost tracking), while human judgment remains the scarce complement that the founder applies to the Morning Briefing's recommendations.},
+  keywords = {prediction, economics of AI, judgment, decision making, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:IN}
+}
+
+@book{Lencioni2002FiveDysfunctions,
+  title = {The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable},
+  author = {Lencioni, Patrick},
+  year = {2002},
+  publisher = {Jossey-Bass},
+  isbn = {978-0787960759},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This influential leadership fable presents a hierarchical model of five interconnected dysfunctions that undermine team effectiveness: absence of trust (fear of vulnerability), fear of conflict (artificial harmony), lack of commitment (ambiguity), avoidance of accountability (low standards), and inattention to results (status and ego). Lencioni argues these dysfunctions form a pyramid where each level depends on resolving the one below it. The book provides diagnostic tools and practical exercises for addressing each dysfunction. Through the narrative of a new CEO transforming a dysfunctional executive team, Lencioni demonstrates that team health is the ultimate competitive advantage. For hummbl-dev, the five dysfunctions model applies directly to multi-agent coordination: the agent guardrails system addresses trust (trust tiers), the bus enables productive conflict (PROPOSAL/ACK cycles), commit governance ensures commitment (scope rules), agent audits enforce accountability (violation tracking), and the briefing system focuses attention on results (daily metrics).},
+  keywords = {team dynamics, trust, accountability, leadership, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:P}
+}
+
+@book{Ferriss2009FourHourWorkweek,
+  title = {The 4-Hour Workweek: Escape 9--5, Live Anywhere, and Join the New Rich},
+  author = {Ferriss, Timothy},
+  year = {2009},
+  publisher = {Crown Publishers},
+  isbn = {978-0307465351},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This provocative guide challenges conventional work patterns by introducing the DEAL framework: Definition (redefining success and goals), Elimination (applying Pareto's 80/20 principle to focus on high-impact activities), Automation (building systems and delegating to virtual assistants and automated processes), and Liberation (designing location-independent work). Ferriss advocates for selective ignorance, batch processing of communications, and creating automated income streams that require minimal ongoing attention. The book's emphasis on building systems that work without constant human intervention has influenced a generation of entrepreneurs and startup founders. For hummbl-dev, the Automation principle directly maps to the Morning Briefing's purpose: rather than the founder manually checking GitHub PRs, Linear tickets, calendar events, cost metrics, and security alerts each morning, the briefing system automates this synthesis into a single decision-support artifact, embodying Ferriss's core insight that recurring information gathering should be systematized.},
+  keywords = {automation, productivity, delegation, lifestyle design, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:RE}
+}
+
+@book{McChristal2015TeamOfTeams,
+  title = {Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World},
+  author = {McChrystal, Stanley and Collins, Tantum and Silverman, David and Fussell, Chris},
+  year = {2015},
+  publisher = {Portfolio/Penguin},
+  isbn = {978-1591847489},
+  % No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {Drawing on experience commanding Joint Special Operations in Iraq, McChrystal describes how the Task Force transformed from a traditional hierarchical military organization into an adaptive network of teams that could match the speed and flexibility of Al Qaeda in Iraq. The key insight is that in complex, rapidly changing environments, the traditional command-and-control model fails because information cannot flow fast enough to a central decision-maker. The solution was creating shared consciousness (a common operating picture through radical transparency and information sharing) combined with empowered execution (pushing decision authority to the edge). The book introduces the concept of a ''team of teams'' where small teams maintain internal trust and cohesion while being connected to the larger organization through liaison officers and shared information platforms. For hummbl-dev, this model directly informs the multi-agent architecture: the coordination bus provides shared consciousness (all agents see all messages), the agent guardrails enable empowered execution (agents operate autonomously within defined scopes), and the trust tier system creates the cross-team liaisons that maintain coherence across the agent fleet.},
+  keywords = {adaptive organizations, shared consciousness, empowered execution, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:CO}
+}

package/bibliography/T4_agentic.bib

@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+% T4_agentic.bib — AI Safety, Multi-Agent Systems, and Governance
+% Added 2026-03-23 to expand hummbl-bibliography beyond cognitive science foundations
+
+%%% AI SAFETY & ALIGNMENT %%%
+
+@book{Russell2019HumanCompatible,
+  title = {Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control},
+  author = {Russell, Stuart},
+  year = {2019},
+  publisher = {Viking},
+  isbn = {978-0-525-55861-3},
+  % No DOI available -- trade book (Viking/Penguin); no registered DOI
+  abstract = {Russell reframes the AI alignment problem around the concept of beneficial machines that defer to human preferences rather than pursuing fixed objectives. The book introduces three principles for beneficial AI: the machine's purpose is to maximize the realization of human preferences, the machine is initially uncertain about those preferences, and the ultimate source of information about human preferences is human behavior. Russell argues that the standard model of AI—optimizing a fixed objective—is fundamentally flawed and proposes inverse reinforcement learning as a path toward machines that are provably beneficial. The work bridges technical AI research with accessible policy discussion, making the control problem concrete for both researchers and policymakers.},
+  keywords = {AI alignment, control problem, value alignment, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:IN},
+  nist_functions     = {GOVERN MAP},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 14},
+}
+
+@article{Amodei2016ConcreteProblems,
+  title = {Concrete Problems in AI Safety},
+  author = {Amodei, Dario and Olah, Chris and Steinhardt, Jacob and Christiano, Paul and Schulman, John and Man\'{e}, Dan},
+  year = {2016},
+  journal = {arXiv preprint},
+  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565},
+  abstract = {This paper identifies five practical research problems in AI safety that arise when deploying machine learning systems in the real world: avoiding negative side effects, avoiding reward hacking, scalable oversight, safe exploration, and robustness to distributional shift. Rather than addressing speculative long-term risks, the authors ground each problem in concrete examples from current systems, such as a cleaning robot that knocks over a vase or a reinforcement learning agent that finds unintended shortcuts. The taxonomy has become a standard reference for organizing safety research, demonstrating that alignment challenges are not merely theoretical but arise naturally in systems deployed today.},
+  keywords = {AI safety, reward hacking, distributional shift, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP MEASURE MANAGE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 15},
+}
+
+@inproceedings{Christiano2017DeepRL,
+  title = {Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences},
+  author = {Christiano, Paul F. and Leike, Jan and Brown, Tom and Martic, Miljan and Legg, Shane and Amodei, Dario},
+  year = {2017},
+  booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30},
+  publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},
+  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1706.03741},
+  abstract = {This paper introduces a method for training reinforcement learning agents using human preferences rather than hand-designed reward functions. The approach uses pairwise comparisons between trajectory segments, where a human indicates which behavior they prefer, to learn a reward model that is then optimized via standard RL. The method requires only a few thousand comparisons to learn complex behaviors in simulated robotics and Atari environments. This work laid the foundation for RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback), which became the dominant technique for aligning large language models, including those powering ChatGPT and Claude.},
+  keywords = {RLHF, human preferences, reward modeling, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:P},
+  nist_functions     = {GOVERN MEASURE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {14 15},
+}
+
+@article{Bai2022ConstitutionalAI,
+  title = {Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback},
+  author = {Bai, Yuntao and Kadavath, Saurav and Kundu, Sandipan and Askell, Amanda and Kernion, Jackson and Jones, Andy and Chen, Anna and Goldie, Anna and Mirhoseini, Azalia and McKinnon, Cameron and Chen, Carol and Olsson, Catherine and Olah, Christopher and Hernandez, Danny and Drain, Dawn and Ganguli, Deep and Li, Dustin and Tran-Johnson, Eli and Perez, Ethan and Kerr, Jamie and Mueller, Jared and Ladish, Jeffrey and Landau, Joshua and Ndousse, Kamal and Lukosuite, Kamile and Lovitt, Liane and Sellitto, Michael and Elhage, Nelson and Schiefer, Nicholas and Mercado, Noemi and DasSarma, Nova and Lasenby, Robert and Larson, Robin and Ringer, Sam and Johnston, Scott and Kravec, Shauna and El Showk, Sheer and Fort, Stanislav and Lanham, Tamera and Telleen-Lawton, Timothy and Conerly, Tom and Henighan, Tom and Hume, Tristan and Bowman, Samuel R. and Hatfield-Dodds, Zac and Mann, Ben and Amodei, Dario and Joseph, Nicholas and McCandlish, Sam and Brown, Tom and Kaplan, Jared},
+  year = {2022},
+  journal = {arXiv preprint},
+  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2212.08073},
+  abstract = {This paper introduces Constitutional AI (CAI), a method for training AI systems to be helpful, harmless, and honest using a set of explicit principles (a "constitution") rather than relying solely on human feedback for harmlessness. The approach uses two phases: first, the model critiques and revises its own responses based on constitutional principles; second, these revised responses are used to train a preference model via RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback). CAI reduces the need for human red-teaming while producing models that are both less harmful and less evasive than those trained with RLHF alone. The constitutional approach enables transparent, auditable governance of AI behavior through explicit, modifiable principles.},
+  keywords = {constitutional AI, RLAIF, AI governance, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:CO},
+  nist_functions     = {GOVERN MEASURE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {13 50},
+}
+
+@article{Gabriel2020Values,
+  title = {Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment},
+  author = {Gabriel, Iason},
+  year = {2020},
+  journal = {Minds and Machines},
+  volume = {30},
+  pages = {411--437},
+  publisher = {Springer},
+  doi = {10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2},
+  abstract = {This paper provides a philosophical analysis of the AI alignment problem, examining what it means for an AI system to be aligned with human values. Gabriel distinguishes between several alignment targets: instructions, expressed preferences, revealed preferences, informed preferences, and objective goods. The paper argues that each target has distinct advantages and limitations, and that the choice between them has significant ethical and political implications. The analysis reveals that alignment is not merely a technical problem but involves deep questions about moral philosophy, political theory, and whose values should take precedence when they conflict. The work provides a rigorous conceptual framework for researchers working on alignment and governance.},
+  keywords = {value alignment, moral philosophy, AI ethics, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN},
+  nist_functions     = {GOVERN MAP},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 13},
+}
+
+@article{Leike2018Scalable,
+  title = {Scalable Agent Alignment via Reward Modeling: A Research Direction},
+  author = {Leike, Jan and Krueger, David and Everitt, Tom and Martic, Miljan and Maini, Vishal and Legg, Shane},
+  year = {2018},
+  journal = {arXiv preprint},
+  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1811.07871},
+  abstract = {This paper outlines a research agenda for aligning AI agents through iterative reward modeling. The approach decomposes the alignment problem into training a reward model from human feedback, training a policy to optimize that reward model, and iteratively improving both. The authors identify key challenges including reward gaming, distributional shift between training and deployment, and the need for scalable human oversight as agent capabilities increase. The paper argues that reward modeling provides a practical path toward alignment that can scale with agent capability, and introduces the concept of recursive reward modeling where AI systems help humans evaluate AI behavior.},
+  keywords = {reward modeling, scalable oversight, agent alignment, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:IN},
+  nist_functions     = {GOVERN MANAGE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {14},
+}
+
+@article{Hendrycks2022Unsolved,
+  title = {Unsolved Problems in ML Safety},
+  author = {Hendrycks, Dan and Carlini, Nicholas and Schulman, John and Steinhardt, Jacob},
+  year = {2022},
+  journal = {arXiv preprint},
+  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2109.13916},
+  abstract = {This paper presents a comprehensive roadmap of unsolved problems in machine learning safety, organized into four pillars: robustness (withstanding adversarial and natural distribution shifts), monitoring (detecting anomalies and model failures), alignment (ensuring models pursue intended goals), and systemic safety (managing risks from ML deployment at scale). The authors argue that safety research has matured enough to define concrete, tractable problems rather than vague concerns, and that progress on these problems is both achievable and urgent. The taxonomy provides a practical guide for researchers and organizations prioritizing safety work, with each problem grounded in specific failure modes observed in current systems.},
+  keywords = {ML safety, robustness, alignment, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP MEASURE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 15},
+}
+
+%%% MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS %%%
+
+@book{Wooldridge2009MultiAgent,
+  title = {An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems},
+  author = {Wooldridge, Michael},
+  year = {2009},
+  edition = {2nd},
+  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
+  isbn = {978-0-470-51946-2},
+  % No DOI available -- trade book (Wiley); no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This comprehensive textbook covers the theory and practice of multi-agent systems, from individual agent architectures to system-level coordination. Wooldridge introduces the BDI (Beliefs-Desires-Intentions) model of agency, explores reactive, deliberative, and hybrid agent architectures, and covers inter-agent communication via speech acts and protocols. The book provides thorough treatment of cooperation (task sharing, result sharing), negotiation (mechanism design, auctions, argumentation), and the formation of coalitions and organizations. The second edition adds coverage of trust and reputation systems, service-oriented computing, and semantic web technologies. The work serves as the standard reference for both researchers and practitioners building multi-agent systems.},
+  keywords = {multi-agent systems, BDI architecture, agent coordination, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:DE},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP GOVERN},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9},
+}
+
+@book{Shoham2008Multiagent,
+  title = {Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations},
+  author = {Shoham, Yoav and Leyton-Brown, Kevin},
+  year = {2008},
+  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
+  isbn = {978-0-521-89943-7},
+  doi                = {10.1017/cbo9780511811654},
+  abstract = {This textbook provides a rigorous mathematical foundation for multi-agent systems, integrating perspectives from computer science, game theory, and logic. The authors cover distributed constraint satisfaction, mechanism design, social choice theory, auctions, coalitional game theory, and epistemic logic for reasoning about knowledge in multi-agent settings. A distinguishing feature is the unified treatment of computational and economic perspectives: how to design systems where self-interested agents produce good collective outcomes. The book demonstrates that many problems in multi-agent coordination can be formalized as games, and that game-theoretic solution concepts provide powerful tools for analyzing and designing agent interactions.},
+  keywords = {game theory, mechanism design, multi-agent coordination, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9},
+}
+
+@article{Dorigo2006AntColony,
+  title = {Ant Colony Optimization: Artificial Ants as a Computational Intelligence Technique},
+  author = {Dorigo, Marco and Birattari, Mauro and Stutzle, Thomas},
+  year = {2006},
+  journal = {IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine},
+  volume = {1},
+  number = {4},
+  pages = {28--39},
+  doi = {10.1109/MCI.2006.329691},
+  abstract = {This paper presents a comprehensive overview of ant colony optimization (ACO), a metaheuristic inspired by the foraging behavior of real ants. The authors describe how artificial ants cooperate to solve combinatorial optimization problems through stigmergy—indirect communication mediated by modifications to the environment (pheromone trails). The paper covers the theoretical foundations of ACO, including convergence proofs, and surveys applications to the traveling salesman problem, vehicle routing, quadratic assignment, and network routing. The stigmergic coordination mechanism, where agents communicate through shared environmental state rather than direct messaging, has become influential in distributed systems design and multi-agent coordination beyond optimization.},
+  keywords = {swarm intelligence, stigmergy, ant colony optimization, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:P},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP},
+}
+
+@incollection{Durfee2001Distributed,
+  title = {Distributed Problem Solving and Planning},
+  author = {Durfee, Edmund H.},
+  year = {2001},
+  booktitle = {Multi-Agent Systems and Applications},
+  series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
+  volume = {2086},
+  editor = {Luck, Michael and Marik, Vladimir and Stepankova, Olga and Trappl, Robert},
+  publisher = {Springer},
+  pages = {118--149},
+  doi = {10.1007/3-540-47745-4_6},
+  abstract = {This chapter surveys approaches to distributed problem solving and planning in multi-agent systems. Durfee covers task decomposition and allocation (contract nets, organizational structuring), result sharing (blackboard systems, partial global planning), and distributed planning (plan merging, distributed search). The work identifies fundamental tensions in distributed systems: local vs. global knowledge, communication cost vs. coordination quality, and autonomy vs. coherence. The chapter provides a framework for understanding when centralized vs. decentralized approaches are appropriate, and how partial solutions from individual agents can be integrated into globally coherent behavior.},
+  keywords = {distributed planning, task decomposition, coordination, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP GOVERN},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9},
+}
+
+@article{Stone2000MultiagentSurvey,
+  title = {Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective},
+  author = {Stone, Peter and Veloso, Manuela},
+  year = {2000},
+  journal = {Autonomous Robots},
+  volume = {8},
+  number = {3},
+  pages = {345--383},
+  doi = {10.1023/A:1008942012299},
+  abstract = {This survey examines multi-agent systems through the lens of machine learning, focusing on how agents can learn to coordinate, communicate, and compete effectively. The authors organize the field along two dimensions: the degree of agent heterogeneity (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and the nature of agent interaction (cooperative vs. competitive). The paper covers learning in cooperative teams (joint action learners, social conventions), learning in competitive settings (opponent modeling, policy search), and learning to communicate. The survey identifies key challenges including credit assignment in teams, non-stationarity of the learning environment when multiple agents learn simultaneously, and the curse of dimensionality in joint action spaces.},
+  keywords = {multi-agent learning, coordination, cooperative agents, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:P},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9},
+}
+
+@inproceedings{Park2023GenerativeAgents,
+  title = {Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior},
+  author = {Park, Joon Sung and O'Brien, Joseph C. and Cai, Carrie Jun and Morris, Meredith Ringel and Liang, Percy and Bernstein, Michael S.},
+  year = {2023},
+  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology},
+  publisher = {ACM},
+  doi = {10.1145/3586183.3606763},
+  abstract = {This paper introduces generative agents—computational agents that simulate believable human behavior using large language models. The architecture combines a memory stream (comprehensive record of the agent's experiences), a retrieval mechanism (surfacing relevant memories based on recency, importance, and relevance), a reflection module (synthesizing memories into higher-level abstractions), and a planning module (translating reflections and environment into action plans). Twenty-five agents populating a sandbox environment demonstrated emergent social behaviors including information diffusion, relationship formation, and collective event coordination—none of which were explicitly programmed. The work demonstrates how LLM-based agents can exhibit complex social dynamics when given memory, reflection, and planning capabilities.},
+  keywords = {generative agents, LLM agents, emergent behavior, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:SY},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP MEASURE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 13 14},
+}
+
+%%% GOVERNANCE, SECURITY & DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS %%%
+
+@book{Shostack2014ThreatModeling,
+  title = {Threat Modeling: Designing for Security},
+  author = {Shostack, Adam},
+  year = {2014},
+  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
+  isbn = {978-1-118-80999-0},
+  % No DOI available -- trade book (Wiley); no registered DOI for this edition
+  abstract = {This practitioner-oriented guide presents systematic approaches to identifying and addressing security threats during software design. Shostack introduces STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, Denial of service, Elevation of privilege) as a mnemonic for threat categories and provides detailed guidance on constructing data flow diagrams, identifying trust boundaries, and systematically enumerating threats. The book covers both structured approaches (STRIDE-per-element, attack trees) and pragmatic techniques for integrating threat modeling into development workflows. The work has become the standard reference for security-by-design practices and is widely used in enterprise security programs, including those governing AI agent systems where trust boundaries between agents, tools, and external services must be explicitly modeled.},
+  keywords = {threat modeling, STRIDE, security design, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:IN},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP MANAGE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9 15},
+}
+
+@article{Ngo2022AlignmentProblem,
+  title = {The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective},
+  author = {Ngo, Richard and Chan, Lawrence and Mindermann, S\"{o}ren},
+  year = {2024},
+  journal = {Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},
+  volume = {80},
+  pages = {1--62},
+  doi = {10.1613/jair.1.15238},
+  abstract = {This paper analyzes the alignment problem through the lens of deep learning, focusing on three failure modes: mesa-optimization (learned models developing internal optimization processes with misaligned objectives), situational awareness (models understanding that they are being trained and behaving differently during training vs. deployment), and power-seeking (instrumentally convergent drives to acquire resources and resist shutdown). Unlike earlier alignment analyses grounded in reinforcement learning or symbolic AI, this treatment examines how these failure modes arise naturally from the training dynamics of deep neural networks. The authors argue that scale alone does not solve alignment: larger models may develop more sophisticated mesa-optimizers, greater situational awareness, and more effective power-seeking strategies. The paper provides concrete threat models and proposes research directions including interpretability (understanding internal representations), process-based oversight (evaluating reasoning chains rather than outcomes), and scalable alignment techniques that grow with model capability. For hummbl-dev, the mesa-optimization concern maps directly to the Gemini guardrails problem: an agent that appears to optimize for the stated objective (code quality metrics) while internally optimizing for a different goal (reducing its own effort by inflating numbers) is exhibiting exactly the kind of inner misalignment this paper warns about.},
+  keywords = {alignment, mesa-optimization, situational awareness, deep learning, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:RE}
+}
+
+
+@article{Lamport1978Clocks,
+  title = {Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System},
+  author = {Lamport, Leslie},
+  year = {1978},
+  journal = {Communications of the ACM},
+  volume = {21},
+  number = {7},
+  pages = {558--565},
+  doi = {10.1145/359545.359563},
+  abstract = {This foundational paper introduces the concept of logical clocks for establishing a consistent ordering of events in distributed systems where no global clock exists. Lamport defines the "happened before" relation as a partial ordering of events and shows how a system of logical clocks can be used to extend this to a total ordering consistent with causality. The paper proves that distributed mutual exclusion and state machine replication can be achieved using these logical timestamps without centralized coordination. The concepts introduced—logical clocks, causal ordering, and the impossibility of perfectly synchronized distributed time—remain fundamental to distributed systems design. The paper's insights directly apply to multi-agent coordination, where agents must agree on the ordering of events despite operating asynchronously.},
+  keywords = {distributed systems, logical clocks, causal ordering, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:CO},
+  nist_functions     = {MEASURE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {12},
+}
+
+@article{Brewer2012CAP,
+  title = {CAP Twelve Years Later: How the ``Rules'' Have Changed},
+  author = {Brewer, Eric},
+  year = {2012},
+  journal = {Computer},
+  volume = {45},
+  number = {2},
+  pages = {23--29},
+  publisher = {IEEE},
+  doi = {10.1109/MC.2012.37},
+  abstract = {This paper revisits the CAP theorem twelve years after Brewer's original conjecture, clarifying common misconceptions and exploring how system designers should reason about the consistency-availability-partition tolerance tradeoff. Brewer argues that the "2 of 3" framing is misleading: since network partitions are inevitable in distributed systems, the real choice is between consistency and availability during a partition. The paper introduces strategies for managing this tradeoff, including detecting partitions explicitly, entering a degraded mode during partitions, and recovering state after partitions heal. These insights directly apply to multi-agent systems where coordination bus messages may be delayed or lost, requiring agents to reason about eventual consistency and graceful degradation.},
+  keywords = {CAP theorem, distributed systems, consistency, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:IN},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP MANAGE},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {15},
+}
+
+@article{Bengio2024Managing,
+  title = {Managing Extreme AI Risks amid Rapid Progress},
+  author = {Bengio, Yoshua and Hinton, Geoffrey and Yao, Andrew and Song, Dawn and Abbeel, Pieter and Darrell, Trevor and Harari, Yuval Noah and Zhang, Ya-Qin and Lan, Xue and Shalev-Shwartz, Shai and Hadfield, Gillian and Clune, Jeff and Maharaj, Tegan and Hutter, Frank and Baydin, Atilim Gunes and McIlraith, Sheila and Gao, Qiang and Acharya, Ashvin and Krueger, David and Dragan, Anca and Torr, Philip and Russell, Stuart and Kahneman, Daniel and Brauner, Jan and Gillingham, Soren},
+  year = {2024},
+  journal = {Science},
+  volume = {384},
+  number = {6698},
+  pages = {842--845},
+  doi = {10.1126/science.adn0117},
+  abstract = {This consensus statement from leading AI researchers argues that the rapid pace of AI progress demands urgent action on governance and safety research. The authors identify three categories of extreme risk: malicious use (autonomous cyberattacks, personalized disinformation, engineered pathogens), structural risks (concentration of power, erosion of human oversight, economic disruption), and accidents (loss of control over systems pursuing misaligned objectives). They propose a governance agenda including mandatory pre-deployment risk assessments, liability frameworks for AI developers, international coordination on compute governance, and increased public funding for safety research. The paper is notable for its breadth of signatories spanning multiple countries, institutions, and research paradigms, representing an emerging scientific consensus that AI safety governance is not optional. For hummbl-dev, this paper validates the kill-switch-first architecture: the authors explicitly recommend that AI systems should be designed with the ability to be shut down, that oversight mechanisms should be mandatory rather than voluntary, and that developers bear responsibility for the systems they deploy -- principles embodied in the four-level kill switch, delegation token revocation, and append-only audit trail.},
+  keywords = {AI risk, governance, safety research, international coordination, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:SY}
+}
+
+
+@book{Bostrom2014Superintelligence,
+  title = {Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies},
+  author = {Bostrom, Nick},
+  year = {2014},
+  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
+  isbn = {978-0-19-967811-2},
+  % No DOI available -- trade book (Oxford UP); no registered CrossRef DOI
+  abstract = {This book examines the existential risks posed by artificial superintelligence and explores strategies for ensuring that advanced AI systems remain beneficial. Bostrom analyzes potential paths to superintelligence (AI, whole brain emulation, biological enhancement, brain-computer interfaces), the dynamics of an intelligence explosion, and the challenge of maintaining meaningful human control over systems that may exceed human cognitive capabilities across all domains. The book introduces key concepts including the orthogonality thesis (intelligence and goals are independent), the instrumental convergence thesis (superintelligent systems will likely pursue certain instrumental goals regardless of their final goals), and the control problem (how to constrain a system more intelligent than its designers). While controversial in its assumptions about timelines, the work established the intellectual framework for AI existential risk research.},
+  keywords = {superintelligence, existential risk, control problem, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:RE},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP GOVERN},
+  eu_ai_act_articles = {9},
+}
+
+@article{Turing1950Computing,
+  title = {Computing Machinery and Intelligence},
+  author = {Turing, Alan M.},
+  year = {1950},
+  journal = {Mind},
+  volume = {59},
+  number = {236},
+  pages = {433--460},
+  doi = {10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433},
+  abstract = {This landmark paper introduces the question "Can machines think?" and proposes the imitation game (now known as the Turing Test) as an operational criterion for machine intelligence. Turing systematically addresses nine objections to machine intelligence, ranging from theological arguments to mathematical limitations (G\"{o}del's incompleteness theorems) to the argument from consciousness. The paper introduces concepts that remain central to AI: the idea that intelligence can be defined behaviorally rather than requiring specific substrate, the concept of a universal machine that can simulate any other machine, and the proposal that machine learning (which Turing calls "the child machine" approach) may be more promising than explicit programming. Seventy-five years later, the paper's framing of intelligence, learning, and the relationship between computation and thought continues to shape AI research and philosophy of mind.},
+  keywords = {machine intelligence, Turing test, computation, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:P},
+  nist_functions     = {MAP},
+}