hummbl-bibliography 1.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.cascade/rules/hummbl-base120.md +107 -0
- package/.github/CODEOWNERS +17 -0
- package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md +24 -0
- package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md +10 -0
- package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/new-entry.md +79 -0
- package/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/quality-improvement.md +71 -0
- package/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md +15 -0
- package/.github/dependabot.yml +17 -0
- package/.github/workflows/ci.yml +98 -0
- package/.github/workflows/doi-enrichment.yml +77 -0
- package/.github/workflows/security-audit.yml +92 -0
- package/.github/workflows/stats-report.yml +59 -0
- package/.github/workflows/validate-models.yml +194 -0
- package/.github/workflows/validate.yml +152 -0
- package/.husky/pre-commit +15 -0
- package/.husky/validation-rules.json +11 -0
- package/CHANGELOG.md +228 -0
- package/CONTRIBUTING.md +110 -0
- package/CONTRIBUTORS.md +257 -0
- package/DEVELOPMENT.md +110 -0
- package/Day_1_Audit_Worksheet.md +64 -0
- package/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/README.md +213 -0
- package/SECURITY.md +16 -0
- package/SITREP.md +141 -0
- package/bibliography/T10_collaboration.bib +281 -0
- package/bibliography/T11_security.bib +311 -0
- package/bibliography/T12_complexity.bib +272 -0
- package/bibliography/T13_reasoning.bib +231 -0
- package/bibliography/T1_canonical.bib +236 -0
- package/bibliography/T2_empirical.bib +258 -0
- package/bibliography/T3_applied.bib +219 -0
- package/bibliography/T4_agentic.bib +281 -0
- package/bibliography/T5_engineering.bib +243 -0
- package/bibliography/T6_governance.bib +277 -0
- package/bibliography/T7_emerging.bib +228 -0
- package/bibliography/T8_cognition.bib +260 -0
- package/bibliography/T9_economics.bib +275 -0
- package/bibliography/hummbl-transformations.json +84 -0
- package/dist/unified-bibliography.json +5699 -0
- package/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md +240 -0
- package/docs/GAP_ANALYSIS.md +142 -0
- package/docs/MULTI_AGENT_COORDINATION_PROTOCOL.md +700 -0
- package/docs/QUALITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md +576 -0
- package/docs/QUALITY_STANDARDS.md +350 -0
- package/docs/TRANSFORMATION_GUIDE.md +337 -0
- package/docs/metrics/model-accuracy.md +150 -0
- package/governance/CAES_CANONICAL.sha256 +1 -0
- package/governance/CAES_SPEC.md +107 -0
- package/governance/CAES_VERSION +1 -0
- package/governance/lexicon/ALLOWLIST_POLICY.md +63 -0
- package/governance/lexicon/CANONICALIZATION.md +63 -0
- package/governance/lexicon/acronym.schema.json +153 -0
- package/governance/lexicon/acronym_allowlist.txt +237 -0
- package/governance/lexicon/acronyms.v0.2.json +2555 -0
- package/llms.txt +1105 -0
- package/mappings/arcana_citations.json +219 -0
- package/mappings/bki_evidence.json +384 -0
- package/package.json +25 -0
- package/reports/.gitkeep +0 -0
- package/reports/citation_graph.json +119335 -0
- package/scripts/add_nist_tags.py +437 -0
- package/scripts/annotate_dois.py +204 -0
- package/scripts/check_palace_aliases.py +200 -0
- package/scripts/ingest_to_open_brain.py +307 -0
- package/scripts/monthly-review.sh +166 -0
- package/scripts/setup-hooks.sh +107 -0
- package/scripts/test_check_palace_aliases.py +194 -0
- package/sources/bki.bib +57 -0
- package/sources/theoretical-foundations.bib +589 -0
- package/toolkit/README.md +360 -0
- package/toolkit/docs/generated/quick-reference.md +179 -0
- package/toolkit/package-lock.json +1140 -0
- package/toolkit/package.json +66 -0
- package/toolkit/scripts/check-memory-palace-aliases.js +230 -0
- package/toolkit/scripts/check-memory-palace-aliases.test.js +297 -0
- package/toolkit/scripts/generate-docs.js +223 -0
- package/toolkit/src/check-duplicates.js +225 -0
- package/toolkit/src/check-required-fields.js +138 -0
- package/toolkit/src/citation-graph.js +425 -0
- package/toolkit/src/extensions/beyondBase120Audit.ts +250 -0
- package/toolkit/src/extensions/memoryPalace.ts +438 -0
- package/toolkit/src/extract-keywords.js +190 -0
- package/toolkit/src/find-missing-dois.js +178 -0
- package/toolkit/src/fix-duplicates.js +140 -0
- package/toolkit/src/merge-entries.js +29 -0
- package/toolkit/src/query.js +281 -0
- package/toolkit/src/stats.js +244 -0
- package/toolkit/src/test-validation.js +117 -0
- package/toolkit/src/utils/modelRegistry.ts +193 -0
- package/toolkit/src/utils/monitorModels.ts +150 -0
- package/toolkit/src/utils/validateModelCode.ts +196 -0
- package/toolkit/src/validate.js +251 -0
- package/toolkit/src/watch.js +100 -0
- package/toolkit/tsconfig.json +25 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
@book{Meadows2008ThinkingSystems,
|
|
2
|
+
title = {Thinking in Systems: A Primer},
|
|
3
|
+
author = {Meadows, Donella H.},
|
|
4
|
+
year = {2008},
|
|
5
|
+
publisher = {Chelsea Green Publishing},
|
|
6
|
+
isbn = {978-1603580557},
|
|
7
|
+
% No DOI available -- Chelsea Green trade book; ISBN-based DOI is unregistered
|
|
8
|
+
abstract = {This primer introduces systems thinking as a way of understanding and working with the complex interconnections in our world. Meadows explains how systems—from ecological to social to economic—function as interconnected networks with their own behaviors and feedback loops. The book presents fundamental system concepts such as stocks, flows, feedback loops, and system boundaries, demonstrating how these elements combine to create complex behaviors. Through accessible examples ranging from bathtubs to global economies, Meadows shows how systems thinking can help identify leverage points for effective intervention. The work serves as both an introduction to systems concepts and a call to apply this perspective to address pressing global challenges, making it an essential resource for policymakers, educators, and anyone seeking to understand and influence complex systems.},
|
|
9
|
+
keywords = {systems thinking, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
10
|
+
}
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
@book{Kahneman2011Thinking,
|
|
13
|
+
title = {Thinking, Fast and Slow},
|
|
14
|
+
author = {Kahneman, Daniel},
|
|
15
|
+
year = {2011},
|
|
16
|
+
publisher = {Farrar, Straus and Giroux},
|
|
17
|
+
isbn = {978-0374533557},
|
|
18
|
+
doi = {10.1037/e412042005-001},
|
|
19
|
+
abstract = {Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman presents a comprehensive examination of human cognition through the lens of two distinct but interacting systems. System 1 operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control, while System 2 allocates attention to effortful mental activities that demand it. The book explores the cognitive biases that arise from our reliance on System 1, including the availability heuristic, anchoring effect, and overconfidence. Drawing on decades of research in psychology and behavioral economics, Kahneman demonstrates how these systematic errors in thinking affect decision-making in fields ranging from finance to medicine to public policy. The work provides profound insights into human judgment and offers practical wisdom for making better decisions in both personal and professional contexts.},
|
|
20
|
+
keywords = {cognitive bias, dual-process theory, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:DE}
|
|
21
|
+
}
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
@book{Simon1996Sciences,
|
|
24
|
+
title = {The Sciences of the Artificial},
|
|
25
|
+
author = {Simon, Herbert A.},
|
|
26
|
+
year = {1996},
|
|
27
|
+
edition = {3rd},
|
|
28
|
+
publisher = {MIT Press},
|
|
29
|
+
isbn = {978-0262691918},
|
|
30
|
+
% No DOI available -- MIT Press does not provide an Open Access DOI for this edition
|
|
31
|
+
abstract = {In this foundational work, Simon presents a theory of design and artificial systems that has profoundly influenced fields from computer science to economics. The book introduces the concept of bounded rationality, arguing that human decision-making is limited by available information, cognitive limitations, and time constraints. Simon explores how artificial systems—whether computer programs, organizations, or economic models—can be understood as symbolic systems that process information and adapt to their environments. The third edition extends these ideas to contemporary developments in complexity theory, examining how concepts like chaos theory and genetic algorithms relate to the science of design. This work remains essential reading for understanding the theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence and the nature of complex systems.},
|
|
32
|
+
keywords = {artificial intelligence, design science, bounded rationality, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:DE}
|
|
33
|
+
}
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
@book{Newell1972Human,
|
|
36
|
+
title = {Human Problem Solving},
|
|
37
|
+
author = {Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert A.},
|
|
38
|
+
year = {1972},
|
|
39
|
+
publisher = {Prentice-Hall},
|
|
40
|
+
isbn = {978-0134454030},
|
|
41
|
+
lccn = {73161290},
|
|
42
|
+
oclc = {585757},
|
|
43
|
+
% No DOI available -- Prentice-Hall 1972 monograph; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
44
|
+
abstract = {This landmark work presents a comprehensive theory of human cognition based on the information processing paradigm. Newell and Simon propose that human problem solving can be understood as a form of heuristic search through a problem space, where the problem solver generates and tests possible solutions using rules of thumb. The book documents extensive research using think-aloud protocols to analyze how people solve problems in domains such as logic puzzles, chess, and mathematics. The authors introduce the General Problem Solver (GPS) computer program, which simulates human problem-solving methods, demonstrating how complex cognitive processes can be modeled as information processing systems. This work established foundational concepts for cognitive science and artificial intelligence, particularly in the areas of production systems and symbolic reasoning.},
|
|
45
|
+
keywords = {problem solving, information processing, heuristic search, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:DE}
|
|
46
|
+
}
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
@book{Csikszentmihalyi1990Flow,
|
|
49
|
+
title = {Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience},
|
|
50
|
+
author = {Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly},
|
|
51
|
+
year = {1990},
|
|
52
|
+
publisher = {Harper \& Row},
|
|
53
|
+
isbn = {978-0060162535},
|
|
54
|
+
lccn = {89045065},
|
|
55
|
+
oclc = {20012112},
|
|
56
|
+
% No DOI available -- Harper & Row trade book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
57
|
+
abstract = {This influential work introduces the concept of "flow"—a state of complete absorption in an activity where time seems to stand still and individuals experience deep enjoyment and fulfillment. Based on decades of research with thousands of participants, Csikszentmihalyi identifies the conditions that foster flow, including clear goals, immediate feedback, and a balance between challenge and skill. The book explores how flow states contribute to personal growth and life satisfaction across various domains, from work and education to sports and the arts. Csikszentmihalyi argues that understanding and cultivating flow experiences can lead to greater happiness and meaning in life. The work has had significant impact in psychology, education, and organizational development, offering practical insights for designing more engaging and fulfilling experiences in both personal and professional contexts.},
|
|
58
|
+
keywords = {flow, optimal experience, intrinsic motivation, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
59
|
+
}
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
@book{Norman2013DesignEveryday,
|
|
62
|
+
title = {The Design of Everyday Things},
|
|
63
|
+
author = {Norman, Donald A.},
|
|
64
|
+
year = {2013},
|
|
65
|
+
edition = {Revised and Expanded},
|
|
66
|
+
publisher = {Basic Books},
|
|
67
|
+
isbn = {978-0465050659},
|
|
68
|
+
doi = {10.15358/9783800648108},
|
|
69
|
+
abstract = {This seminal work in user-centered design explores the psychology of how people interact with everyday objects and why some designs work while others lead to frustration. Norman introduces fundamental principles of design psychology, including affordances, signifiers, mapping, and feedback, showing how these elements shape user experience. The book examines both good and bad design examples, from doors and stoves to digital interfaces, demonstrating how design can either enhance or hinder usability. Norman argues that design should be based on an understanding of human cognition and behavior, making products intuitive and error-resistant. The revised edition updates these concepts for the digital age, addressing contemporary issues in interaction design. This work has become essential reading for designers, engineers, and anyone interested in creating user-friendly products and systems.},
|
|
70
|
+
keywords = {design, usability, affordances, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
71
|
+
}
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
@book{Pearl2009Causality,
|
|
74
|
+
title = {Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference},
|
|
75
|
+
author = {Pearl, Judea},
|
|
76
|
+
year = {2009},
|
|
77
|
+
edition = {2nd},
|
|
78
|
+
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
|
|
79
|
+
isbn = {978-0521895606},
|
|
80
|
+
doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511803161},
|
|
81
|
+
abstract = {This comprehensive work presents a mathematical framework for understanding and analyzing causality, moving beyond traditional statistical approaches to establish a calculus of cause and effect. Pearl introduces causal diagrams (directed acyclic graphs) as a powerful tool for representing and reasoning about causal relationships, showing how they can be used to answer complex causal questions. The book covers three levels of causal analysis: association (seeing), intervention (doing), and counterfactuals (imagining), providing a unified treatment of causal inference across disciplines. Pearl demonstrates how this framework resolves long-standing problems in statistics, artificial intelligence, and the social sciences, offering practical methods for distinguishing correlation from causation. The second edition includes new material on causal inference in complex systems and has become a foundational text in fields ranging from epidemiology to machine learning.},
|
|
82
|
+
keywords = {causality, inference, causal models, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
83
|
+
}
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
@book{Lakoff1980MetaphorsWeLive,
|
|
86
|
+
title = {Metaphors We Live By},
|
|
87
|
+
author = {Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark},
|
|
88
|
+
year = {1980},
|
|
89
|
+
publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
|
|
90
|
+
isbn = {978-0226468013},
|
|
91
|
+
doi = {10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001},
|
|
92
|
+
abstract = {This groundbreaking work challenges traditional views of metaphor as merely a linguistic device, arguing instead that metaphors fundamentally structure human thought and experience. The authors demonstrate how conceptual metaphors—such as "argument is war" or "time is money"—shape our understanding of abstract concepts by mapping them onto concrete, embodied experiences. The book introduces key concepts in cognitive linguistics, including the distinction between structural, orientational, and ontological metaphors, showing how these shape our perceptions and actions in everyday life. Through numerous examples from language and thought, the authors reveal how metaphorical thinking influences everything from politics to personal relationships. This work has had profound implications across disciplines, from cognitive science to literary theory, and remains essential reading for understanding the cognitive basis of meaning and thought.},
|
|
93
|
+
keywords = {metaphor, conceptual systems, cognitive linguistics, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
94
|
+
% Note: No DOI found for this edition
|
|
95
|
+
}
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
@book{Hofstadter1979Godel,
|
|
98
|
+
title = {Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid},
|
|
99
|
+
author = {Hofstadter, Douglas R.},
|
|
100
|
+
year = {1979},
|
|
101
|
+
publisher = {Basic Books},
|
|
102
|
+
isbn = {978-0465026562},
|
|
103
|
+
% No DOI available -- original DOI was for a JSTOR review, not the book itself
|
|
104
|
+
abstract = {This Pulitzer Prize-winning work explores the nature of consciousness and creativity through an intricate exploration of mathematics, art, and music. Hofstadter weaves together the works of logician Kurt Gödel, artist M.C. Escher, and composer Johann Sebastian Bach to demonstrate how self-reference and formal rules can give rise to meaning and consciousness. The book introduces fundamental concepts in mathematics, computer science, and cognitive science, including formal systems, recursion, and the nature of intelligence. Through dialogues, puzzles, and thought experiments, Hofstadter examines the possibility of artificial intelligence and the essence of human thought. The work remains a landmark in interdisciplinary scholarship, offering profound insights into the nature of mind and the foundations of meaning.},
|
|
105
|
+
keywords = {recursion, self-reference, consciousness, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
106
|
+
}
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
@book{Kuhn1996Structure,
|
|
109
|
+
title = {The Structure of Scientific Revolutions},
|
|
110
|
+
author = {Kuhn, Thomas S.},
|
|
111
|
+
year = {1996},
|
|
112
|
+
edition = {3rd},
|
|
113
|
+
publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
|
|
114
|
+
isbn = {978-0226458083},
|
|
115
|
+
doi = {10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001},
|
|
116
|
+
abstract = {This revolutionary work challenges the traditional view of scientific progress as a steady accumulation of knowledge, proposing instead that science advances through periodic paradigm shifts. Kuhn introduces key concepts such as "normal science," "paradigm," and "scientific revolution," arguing that scientific communities operate within conceptual frameworks that determine what counts as legitimate problems and solutions. The book examines historical case studies, including the Copernican revolution and the development of quantum mechanics, to illustrate how scientific paradigms change through periods of crisis and revolution. Kuhn's analysis has had profound implications for the philosophy, history, and sociology of science, challenging the notion of objective scientific progress and highlighting the social and psychological dimensions of scientific practice. The third edition includes an important postscript addressing criticisms and clarifying key concepts.},
|
|
117
|
+
keywords = {paradigm shift, scientific method, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN}
|
|
118
|
+
}
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
@book{Tufte2001VisualDisplay,
|
|
121
|
+
title = {The Visual Display of Quantitative Information},
|
|
122
|
+
author = {Tufte, Edward R.},
|
|
123
|
+
year = {2001},
|
|
124
|
+
edition = {2nd},
|
|
125
|
+
publisher = {Graphics Press},
|
|
126
|
+
isbn = {978-0961392147},
|
|
127
|
+
% Note: No DOI found for this self-published work
|
|
128
|
+
% No DOI available -- trade book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
129
|
+
abstract = {This seminal work revolutionizes the field of data visualization by establishing fundamental principles for the effective presentation of quantitative information. Tufte introduces concepts such as data-ink ratio, chartjunk, and small multiples, demonstrating how to maximize the amount of information communicated while minimizing visual clutter. The book presents numerous historical and contemporary examples of both excellent and poor data visualizations, analyzing what makes them succeed or fail. Tufte emphasizes the importance of integrity in data presentation, showing how misleading graphics can distort understanding. The second edition includes additional examples and refinements to the original principles. This work has become an essential reference for anyone involved in data analysis, scientific communication, or information design, influencing fields from journalism to computer science.},
|
|
130
|
+
keywords = {data visualization, information design, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
131
|
+
}
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
@book{Taleb2007BlackSwan,
|
|
134
|
+
title = {The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable},
|
|
135
|
+
author = {Taleb, Nassim Nicholas},
|
|
136
|
+
year = {2007},
|
|
137
|
+
publisher = {Random House},
|
|
138
|
+
isbn = {978-1400063512},
|
|
139
|
+
% No DOI available -- original DOI was for a book review in Contemporary Physics, not the book
|
|
140
|
+
abstract = {This provocative work challenges conventional wisdom about probability and risk, arguing that the most significant historical events are often unpredictable "Black Swans"—rare, high-impact occurrences that lie outside the realm of normal expectations. Taleb critiques the overreliance on Gaussian (bell curve) statistics in fields from finance to medicine, showing how this leads to systematic underestimation of extreme events. The book introduces concepts such as the "narrative fallacy" (our tendency to create stories after the fact to explain unexpected events) and the "ludic fallacy" (the misuse of games of chance as models for real-world uncertainty). Drawing on examples from history, finance, and science, Taleb argues for a more robust approach to uncertainty that acknowledges the limits of prediction. The work has had significant influence in fields ranging from risk management to philosophy of science.},
|
|
141
|
+
keywords = {uncertainty, probability, rare events, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:P}
|
|
142
|
+
}
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
@book{Alexander1977Pattern,
|
|
145
|
+
title = {A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction},
|
|
146
|
+
author = {Alexander, Christopher and Ishikawa, Sara and Silverstein, Murray},
|
|
147
|
+
year = {1977},
|
|
148
|
+
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
|
|
149
|
+
isbn = {978-0195019193},
|
|
150
|
+
% Note: Previous DOI (10.1017/CBO9780511819065) was incorrect - no valid DOI found for this edition
|
|
151
|
+
% No DOI available -- pre-DOI era monograph (published 1977); no registered DOI
|
|
152
|
+
abstract = {This influential work presents a new theory of architecture and urban design based on the concept of "pattern languages"—systems of solutions to recurring design problems. The book introduces 253 interconnected patterns that span scales from entire regions down to the details of construction, each addressing a specific context, problem, and solution. These patterns range from large-scale urban planning principles (e.g., "City Country Fingers") to interior design details (e.g., "Window Place"), all aimed at creating built environments that enhance human well-being. The authors argue that good design emerges from understanding how people interact with their environments and that users should be involved in the design process. This work has had profound influence beyond architecture, particularly in software engineering where it inspired design patterns in object-oriented programming.},
|
|
153
|
+
keywords = {design patterns, architecture, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
154
|
+
}
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
@book{Senge1990FifthDiscipline,
|
|
157
|
+
title = {The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization},
|
|
158
|
+
author = {Senge, Peter M.},
|
|
159
|
+
year = {1990},
|
|
160
|
+
publisher = {Doubleday},
|
|
161
|
+
isbn = {978-0385517256},
|
|
162
|
+
% Note: No DOI found for this edition
|
|
163
|
+
% No DOI available -- trade business book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
164
|
+
abstract = {This influential work introduces the concept of the learning organization—an organization where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire. Senge presents five disciplines that distinguish learning organizations: personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, team learning, and systems thinking (the "fifth discipline" that integrates the others). The book demonstrates how organizations can overcome "learning disabilities" that limit their effectiveness, using case studies from companies that have successfully implemented these principles. Senge emphasizes the importance of seeing interrelationships rather than linear cause-effect chains and moving beyond blame to understand the systemic causes of problems. The work has become a cornerstone of organizational development theory and practice, influencing leadership development and corporate strategy worldwide.},
|
|
165
|
+
keywords = {systems thinking, organizational learning, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
166
|
+
}
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
@book{VonNeumann1944GameTheory,
|
|
169
|
+
title = {Theory of Games and Economic Behavior},
|
|
170
|
+
author = {von Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar},
|
|
171
|
+
year = {1944},
|
|
172
|
+
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
|
|
173
|
+
isbn = {978-0691130613},
|
|
174
|
+
% No DOI available -- Princeton UP 1944 anniversary edition; no registered DOI
|
|
175
|
+
abstract = {This foundational work establishes the mathematical framework for game theory, creating a new paradigm for understanding strategic decision-making in economics, political science, and other social sciences. The book introduces key concepts such as zero-sum games, the minimax theorem, expected utility theory, and the solution concept of equilibrium. Von Neumann and Morgenstern demonstrate how mathematical analysis can be applied to model and predict the behavior of rational decision-makers in competitive situations. The work provides rigorous proofs of fundamental theorems while also exploring applications to economic behavior, including oligopoly, bargaining, and voting systems. This book not only created the field of game theory but also laid the groundwork for developments in fields as diverse as evolutionary biology, computer science, and military strategy.},
|
|
176
|
+
keywords = {game theory, decision theory, strategic thinking, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
177
|
+
}
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
@article{Miller1956MagicalNumber,
|
|
180
|
+
title = {The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information},
|
|
181
|
+
author = {Miller, George A.},
|
|
182
|
+
year = {1956},
|
|
183
|
+
journal = {Psychological Review},
|
|
184
|
+
volume = {63},
|
|
185
|
+
number = {2},
|
|
186
|
+
pages = {81--97},
|
|
187
|
+
doi = {10.1037/h0043158},
|
|
188
|
+
abstract = {This seminal paper establishes the cognitive limitation known as Miller's Law, which posits that the number of objects an average human can hold in working memory is about seven, plus or minus two. Miller analyzes both absolute judgment tasks (simultaneous discrimination) and immediate memory span (sequential recall), finding similar capacity limits across different sensory modalities. The paper introduces the concept of "chunking" as a mechanism to overcome these limitations by organizing information into meaningful units. Miller's work has had profound implications across psychology, human-computer interaction, and interface design, influencing everything from telephone number formats to menu design. The paper also discusses the relationship between information theory and psychology, suggesting that the human information processing system has evolved to handle the statistical structure of natural environments.},
|
|
189
|
+
keywords = {working memory, cognitive limits, chunking, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
190
|
+
}
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
@book{Gladwell2000TippingPoint,
|
|
193
|
+
title = {The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference},
|
|
194
|
+
author = {Gladwell, Malcolm},
|
|
195
|
+
year = {2000},
|
|
196
|
+
publisher = {Little, Brown and Company},
|
|
197
|
+
isbn = {978-0316316965},
|
|
198
|
+
% No DOI available -- Little, Brown trade book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
199
|
+
abstract = {This influential work explores the phenomenon of social epidemics and the factors that cause ideas, products, messages, and behaviors to spread like viruses. Gladwell introduces three key principles: the Law of the Few (certain types of people are crucial in spreading ideas), the Stickiness Factor (some messages are more memorable than others), and the Power of Context (environmental conditions must be right for an epidemic to occur). Through case studies ranging from the sudden popularity of Hush Puppies shoes to the dramatic drop in New York City's crime rate, the book demonstrates how small changes can have large effects in complex social systems. Gladwell's accessible writing style and compelling examples have made this book a cornerstone in the study of social dynamics and behavioral economics. The work has influenced fields as diverse as marketing, public health, and social policy.},
|
|
200
|
+
keywords = {social epidemics, critical mass, network effects, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
@book{Schon1983ReflectivePractitioner,
|
|
204
|
+
title = {The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action},
|
|
205
|
+
author = {Schön, Donald A.},
|
|
206
|
+
year = {1983},
|
|
207
|
+
publisher = {Basic Books},
|
|
208
|
+
isbn = {978-0465068784},
|
|
209
|
+
% No DOI available -- Basic Books trade book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
210
|
+
abstract = {This groundbreaking work challenges the traditional model of technical rationality in professional practice, proposing instead a theory of reflective practice that emphasizes the artistry professionals demonstrate in complex, uncertain situations. Schön distinguishes between reflection-on-action (thinking about practice after it occurs) and reflection-in-action (thinking while doing), arguing that the latter is essential for dealing with the "swampy lowlands" of real-world problems that don't fit standard technical solutions. Through detailed case studies of architects, psychotherapists, and other professionals, the book demonstrates how practitioners use reflection to frame problems, test assumptions, and develop new approaches in the midst of action. The work has had profound influence on professional education, particularly in fields like teaching, nursing, and social work, where it has helped shape approaches to professional development and clinical supervision.},
|
|
211
|
+
keywords = {reflection, professional practice, tacit knowledge, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
212
|
+
}
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
@book{Gibson1979EcologicalApproach,
|
|
215
|
+
title = {The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception},
|
|
216
|
+
author = {Gibson, James J.},
|
|
217
|
+
year = {1979},
|
|
218
|
+
publisher = {Houghton Mifflin},
|
|
219
|
+
isbn = {978-0898599596},
|
|
220
|
+
% No DOI available -- Houghton Mifflin trade book; no registered DOI for this edition
|
|
221
|
+
abstract = {This seminal work presents Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception, which fundamentally challenges traditional cognitive theories by arguing that perception is a direct process rather than one mediated by mental representations. The book introduces key concepts such as the optic array, invariants in the visual field, and most famously, affordances—the action possibilities offered by the environment to an organism. Gibson argues that perception is an active process of information pickup from the ambient array of light, with the environment providing all the information needed for perception without requiring complex mental processing. The work has had profound influence across psychology, design, human-computer interaction, and robotics, offering a radical alternative to the information-processing approach that dominated mid-20th century cognitive science. Gibson's emphasis on the organism-environment system as the proper unit of analysis continues to shape research in embodied and situated cognition.},
|
|
222
|
+
keywords = {perception, ecological psychology, affordances, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN}
|
|
223
|
+
}
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
@book{Laird2012Standard,
|
|
226
|
+
title = {The Soar Cognitive Architecture},
|
|
227
|
+
author = {Laird, John E.},
|
|
228
|
+
year = {2012},
|
|
229
|
+
publisher = {MIT Press},
|
|
230
|
+
isbn = {978-0262017832},
|
|
231
|
+
% No DOI available -- MIT Press DOI is unregistered at doi.org
|
|
232
|
+
abstract = {This comprehensive work presents the Soar cognitive architecture, a unified computational framework for modeling human cognition that has been under continuous development since the 1980s. Laird details how Soar integrates perception, cognition, and action within a single system based on principles of symbolic processing and learning. The book covers Soar's core components, including its working memory, production system, and learning mechanisms, showing how they interact to produce complex, goal-directed behavior. Through numerous examples and applications, Laird demonstrates how Soar has been used to model human problem-solving, language understanding, and skill acquisition. The work also discusses Soar's implications for theories of intelligence, both human and artificial, and its applications in areas ranging from intelligent tutoring systems to autonomous agents. As one of the most thoroughly developed cognitive architectures, Soar represents a significant contribution to both cognitive science and artificial intelligence research.},
|
|
233
|
+
keywords = {cognitive architecture, artificial intelligence, cognitive modeling, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
234
|
+
}
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
% Test comment for valid commit
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
@article{Rasmussen1983Skills,
|
|
2
|
+
title = {Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models},
|
|
3
|
+
author = {Rasmussen, Jens},
|
|
4
|
+
year = {1983},
|
|
5
|
+
journal = {IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics},
|
|
6
|
+
volume = {SMC-13},
|
|
7
|
+
number = {3},
|
|
8
|
+
pages = {257--266},
|
|
9
|
+
doi = {10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160},
|
|
10
|
+
abstract = {This seminal paper introduces a three-level framework for understanding human performance in complex systems: skill-based, rule-based, and knowledge-based behavior. The skill-based level represents automatic, sensorimotor performance; the rule-based level involves the application of stored rules or procedures; and the knowledge-based level requires conscious problem-solving and decision-making. Rasmussen also distinguishes between signals (directly related to physical properties), signs (learned associations), and symbols (abstract representations) in human-machine interaction. The paper provides a comprehensive model for analyzing human error, suggesting that different types of errors occur at each level of cognitive control. This framework has become foundational in cognitive systems engineering, influencing the design of safer and more effective human-machine systems across domains from aviation to healthcare. The paper's insights continue to inform research on human factors, training design, and system safety.},
|
|
11
|
+
keywords = {human performance, cognitive systems engineering, decision making, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
12
|
+
}
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
@article{Frith2007Making,
|
|
15
|
+
title = {Social Cognition in Humans},
|
|
16
|
+
author = {Frith, Chris D. and Frith, Uta},
|
|
17
|
+
year = {2007},
|
|
18
|
+
journal = {Current Biology},
|
|
19
|
+
volume = {17},
|
|
20
|
+
number = {16},
|
|
21
|
+
pages = {R724--R732},
|
|
22
|
+
doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.068},
|
|
23
|
+
abstract = {This comprehensive review integrates findings from psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science to present a unified account of human social cognition. The authors examine how we understand others' minds through theory of mind, empathy, and mentalizing, highlighting the neural mechanisms underlying these processes. They discuss the role of mirror neurons, the temporoparietal junction, and the medial prefrontal cortex in social cognition. The paper also explores how social signals, such as gaze direction and facial expressions, are processed and integrated to form social judgments. The authors propose that social cognition is not just about understanding others but also about predicting and influencing their behavior. This work has significantly advanced our understanding of both typical social cognition and conditions where it is impaired, such as autism spectrum disorders. The integration of behavioral and neuroscientific approaches provides a robust framework for future research in social neuroscience.},
|
|
24
|
+
keywords = {social cognition, theory of mind, neuroscience, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
25
|
+
}
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
@article{Tversky1974Judgment,
|
|
28
|
+
title = {Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases},
|
|
29
|
+
author = {Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel},
|
|
30
|
+
year = {1974},
|
|
31
|
+
journal = {Science},
|
|
32
|
+
volume = {185},
|
|
33
|
+
number = {4157},
|
|
34
|
+
pages = {1124--1131},
|
|
35
|
+
doi = {10.1126/science.185.4157.1124},
|
|
36
|
+
abstract = {This landmark paper introduces three cognitive heuristics that people use to make judgments under uncertainty, along with the systematic biases that result from their application. The representativeness heuristic leads to judgments based on how similar an instance is to a prototype, often neglecting base rates and sample size. The availability heuristic causes people to estimate the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind, which can be influenced by recency, salience, and emotional impact. The anchoring and adjustment heuristic shows how initial values (anchors) bias subsequent numerical estimates, even when the anchors are arbitrary. The paper demonstrates through a series of experiments how these heuristics can lead to predictable errors in judgment and decision-making. This work laid the foundation for the field of behavioral economics and has had profound implications for understanding human reasoning, particularly in complex, uncertain environments. The research continues to influence diverse fields from medicine to public policy.},
|
|
37
|
+
keywords = {heuristics, cognitive bias, decision making, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:DE}
|
|
38
|
+
}
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
@article{Simon1955Behavioral,
|
|
41
|
+
title = {A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice},
|
|
42
|
+
author = {Simon, Herbert A.},
|
|
43
|
+
year = {1955},
|
|
44
|
+
journal = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
|
|
45
|
+
volume = {69},
|
|
46
|
+
number = {1},
|
|
47
|
+
pages = {99--118},
|
|
48
|
+
doi = {10.2307/1884852},
|
|
49
|
+
abstract = {This foundational paper challenges the classical economic model of perfect rationality, proposing instead a model of bounded rationality that accounts for human cognitive limitations. Simon argues that decision-makers operate with incomplete information, limited cognitive resources, and time constraints, leading them to "satisfice" rather than optimize—choosing options that meet minimum criteria rather than seeking the single best outcome. The paper introduces the concept of "bounded rationality" to describe how actual human decision-making deviates from the idealized rational agent model. Simon's framework considers the decision environment's structure, the decision-maker's information-processing capabilities, and the cognitive costs of decision-making. This work has had profound implications across economics, psychology, and artificial intelligence, influencing fields as diverse as organizational behavior, behavioral economics, and human-computer interaction. The paper's insights remain highly relevant for understanding decision-making in complex, real-world contexts.},
|
|
50
|
+
keywords = {bounded rationality, satisficing, decision making, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:P}
|
|
51
|
+
}
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
@article{March1991Exploration,
|
|
54
|
+
title = {Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning},
|
|
55
|
+
author = {March, James G.},
|
|
56
|
+
year = {1991},
|
|
57
|
+
journal = {Organization Science},
|
|
58
|
+
volume = {2},
|
|
59
|
+
number = {1},
|
|
60
|
+
pages = {71--87},
|
|
61
|
+
doi = {10.1287/orsc.2.1.71},
|
|
62
|
+
abstract = {This influential paper presents a theoretical framework for understanding how organizations balance exploration (search for new knowledge and innovation) and exploitation (refinement and extension of existing knowledge). March develops a mathematical model showing how the allocation of resources between these competing activities affects organizational adaptation and survival. The analysis reveals several counterintuitive findings: systems that emphasize exploitation tend to outperform explorers in the short run but may become trapped in suboptimal equilibria, while systems that balance exploration and exploitation demonstrate greater long-term adaptability. The paper also examines how factors like organizational slack, competition, and environmental turbulence influence the optimal balance. This work has had profound implications for research on organizational learning, innovation, and strategic management, providing a foundation for understanding the challenges of sustaining innovation in established organizations. The exploration-exploitation framework has been widely applied across management science, economics, and computer science.},
|
|
63
|
+
keywords = {organizational learning, exploration-exploitation, adaptation, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
64
|
+
}
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
@article{Weick1993Collapse,
|
|
67
|
+
title = {The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster},
|
|
68
|
+
author = {Weick, Karl E.},
|
|
69
|
+
year = {1993},
|
|
70
|
+
journal = {Administrative Science Quarterly},
|
|
71
|
+
volume = {38},
|
|
72
|
+
number = {4},
|
|
73
|
+
pages = {628--652},
|
|
74
|
+
doi = {10.2307/2393339},
|
|
75
|
+
abstract = {This seminal paper analyzes the 1949 Mann Gulch wildfire disaster through the lens of organizational sensemaking, where 13 smokejumpers perished due to a breakdown in collective understanding and coordination. Weick identifies seven key properties of sensemaking that failed during the crisis: (1) social context, (2) identity construction, (3) retrospective interpretation, (4) salient cues, (5) ongoing projects, (6) plausibility over accuracy, and (7) enactment. The analysis reveals how the firefighters' inability to abandon their existing mental models and tools (like their heavy equipment) when faced with an unprecedented firestorm led to tragic consequences. The paper introduces the concept of "cosmology episodes"—moments when people suddenly feel that their universe is no longer rational. This work has profoundly influenced organizational studies, crisis management, and high-reliability organization theory, offering critical insights into why organizations fail to adapt to unexpected events and how they can build more resilient sensemaking capabilities.},
|
|
76
|
+
keywords = {sensemaking, organizational resilience, crisis management, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
77
|
+
}
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
@incollection{Dunbar1995InVivo,
|
|
80
|
+
title = {How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories},
|
|
81
|
+
author = {Dunbar, Kevin},
|
|
82
|
+
year = {1995},
|
|
83
|
+
booktitle = {The Nature of Insight},
|
|
84
|
+
editor = {Sternberg, Robert J. and Davidson, Janet E.},
|
|
85
|
+
publisher = {MIT Press},
|
|
86
|
+
pages = {365--395},
|
|
87
|
+
isbn = {978-0262193986},
|
|
88
|
+
doi = {10.7551/mitpress/4879.003.0017},
|
|
89
|
+
abstract = {This groundbreaking study employs naturalistic observation to investigate how scientists actually reason in their daily laboratory work, contrasting with traditional studies of scientific reasoning that used artificial tasks. Dunbar's research reveals that scientists primarily use analogical reasoning to understand unexpected findings, often drawing analogies to familiar biological systems or mechanical devices. The study identifies four key findings: (1) most reasoning is done in group settings rather than individually, (2) unexpected findings often lead to conceptual change rather than rejection of data, (3) analogies are frequently used to explain results to others, and (4) the social context of the laboratory significantly influences reasoning processes. The research challenges traditional models of scientific reasoning by demonstrating the importance of distributed cognition and collaborative problem-solving in scientific discovery. This work has had significant implications for science education and our understanding of creativity and innovation in scientific practice.},
|
|
90
|
+
keywords = {scientific reasoning, analogy, conceptual change, HUMMBL:RE, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
91
|
+
}
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
@article{Gentner1983Structure,
|
|
94
|
+
title = {Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy},
|
|
95
|
+
author = {Gentner, Dedre},
|
|
96
|
+
year = {1983},
|
|
97
|
+
journal = {Cognitive Science},
|
|
98
|
+
volume = {7},
|
|
99
|
+
number = {2},
|
|
100
|
+
pages = {155--170},
|
|
101
|
+
doi = {10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3},
|
|
102
|
+
abstract = {This foundational paper introduces the structure-mapping theory of analogy, which posits that analogy involves aligning the relational structures of a source (base) and target domain while preserving relational structure. The theory makes several key claims: (1) analogical processing is structure-mapping—a process of aligning and projecting knowledge from one domain to another based on shared relational structure; (2) the process is governed by the systematicity principle, favoring deep, interconnected systems of relations over superficial similarities; and (3) analogies can be distinguished from literal similarity statements and other types of comparisons based on the nature of the mapped relations. The paper presents empirical evidence from psychological experiments supporting these claims and introduces the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) as a computational model implementing these principles. This work has had profound implications for cognitive science, artificial intelligence, and education, providing a rigorous framework for understanding how analogical reasoning supports learning and problem-solving.},
|
|
103
|
+
keywords = {analogy, cognitive mapping, reasoning, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
104
|
+
}
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
@article{Gigerenzer1996Reasoning,
|
|
107
|
+
title = {Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality},
|
|
108
|
+
author = {Gigerenzer, Gerd and Goldstein, Daniel G.},
|
|
109
|
+
year = {1996},
|
|
110
|
+
journal = {Psychological Review},
|
|
111
|
+
volume = {103},
|
|
112
|
+
number = {4},
|
|
113
|
+
pages = {650--669},
|
|
114
|
+
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650},
|
|
115
|
+
abstract = {This influential paper challenges the view that complex problems require complex solutions, demonstrating that simple heuristics can yield accurate decisions with minimal information and computation. The authors introduce the concept of "fast and frugal" heuristics—simple decision rules that exploit the structure of information in the environment. They present the Take The Best (TTB) heuristic as an example, which makes inferences by searching through cues in order of validity and stopping as soon as it finds a discriminating cue. Through mathematical analysis and computer simulations, the authors show that these simple heuristics can match or even outperform more complex decision strategies in real-world environments. The paper introduces the concept of ecological rationality—the idea that the effectiveness of a decision strategy depends on its match to environmental structures. This work has had significant implications for understanding human decision-making and has influenced fields ranging from behavioral economics to artificial intelligence.},
|
|
116
|
+
keywords = {heuristics, bounded rationality, fast-and-frugal, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:IN}
|
|
117
|
+
}
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
@article{Larkin1980Expert,
|
|
120
|
+
title = {Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems},
|
|
121
|
+
author = {Larkin, Jill and McDermott, John and Simon, Dorothea P. and Simon, Herbert A.},
|
|
122
|
+
year = {1980},
|
|
123
|
+
journal = {Science},
|
|
124
|
+
volume = {208},
|
|
125
|
+
number = {4450},
|
|
126
|
+
pages = {1335--1342},
|
|
127
|
+
doi = {10.1126/science.208.4450.1335},
|
|
128
|
+
abstract = {This landmark study compares how experts and novices approach physics problem-solving, revealing fundamental differences in their cognitive processes. Using think-aloud protocols and detailed task analysis, the research demonstrates that experts work forward from given information to derive needed quantities using well-organized knowledge schemas, while novices often work backward from the unknown to the given information in a means-ends analysis. The study identifies several key differences: (1) experts spend more time developing qualitative representations of problems before attempting quantitative solutions, (2) they use principle-based approaches rather than formula-based approaches, and (3) they organize their knowledge around fundamental physical principles rather than surface features. The paper introduces the concept of "chunking" in expert memory and shows how experts' knowledge organization enables more efficient problem-solving. This work has had profound implications for science education, particularly in developing instructional methods that help students acquire expert-like problem-solving skills.},
|
|
129
|
+
keywords = {expertise, problem solving, knowledge representation, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
130
|
+
}
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
@article{Chi1981Categorization,
|
|
133
|
+
title = {Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices},
|
|
134
|
+
author = {Chi, Michelene T. H. and Feltovich, Paul J. and Glaser, Robert},
|
|
135
|
+
year = {1981},
|
|
136
|
+
journal = {Cognitive Science},
|
|
137
|
+
volume = {5},
|
|
138
|
+
number = {2},
|
|
139
|
+
pages = {121--152},
|
|
140
|
+
doi = {10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2},
|
|
141
|
+
abstract = {This influential study investigates the differences between how expert and novice physicists categorize and represent physics problems. Using a card-sorting task and think-aloud protocols, the research reveals that experts group problems based on fundamental physics principles (deep structure), while novices focus on surface features like the objects or physical configurations mentioned. The paper introduces the concept of "schemas" as organized knowledge structures that experts use to represent problems, which include information about relevant principles, constraints, and solution procedures. The study identifies several dimensions of expert-novice differences, including the level of abstraction, coherence of problem representations, and ability to recognize underlying principles. These findings have had significant implications for physics education, suggesting that instruction should emphasize conceptual understanding and problem categorization based on underlying principles rather than superficial features. The work has influenced educational practices across STEM disciplines.},
|
|
142
|
+
keywords = {expertise, categorization, schema, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:P}
|
|
143
|
+
}
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
@article{Treisman1980Features,
|
|
146
|
+
title = {A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention},
|
|
147
|
+
author = {Treisman, Anne M. and Gelade, Garry},
|
|
148
|
+
year = {1980},
|
|
149
|
+
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
|
|
150
|
+
volume = {12},
|
|
151
|
+
number = {1},
|
|
152
|
+
pages = {97--136},
|
|
153
|
+
doi = {10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5},
|
|
154
|
+
abstract = {This seminal paper presents the Feature Integration Theory (FIT) of attention, which proposes a two-stage model of visual processing. In the first stage, features such as color, orientation, and motion are processed preattentively and in parallel across the visual field. In the second stage, focused attention binds these features into coherent object representations. The theory explains a wide range of phenomena, including the pop-out effect for simple features, the binding problem, and illusory conjunctions that occur under conditions of divided attention. The paper reports a series of experiments using visual search tasks that demonstrate these effects. The theory has had a profound influence on cognitive psychology and neuroscience, providing a framework for understanding both normal visual processing and clinical conditions like visual agnosia. FIT remains one of the most influential theories of visual attention and object perception, with applications in human-computer interaction, visual design, and the study of attentional disorders.},
|
|
155
|
+
keywords = {attention, perception, feature integration, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
156
|
+
}
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
@article{Nisbett1977Telling,
|
|
159
|
+
title = {Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes},
|
|
160
|
+
author = {Nisbett, Richard E. and Wilson, Timothy D.},
|
|
161
|
+
year = {1977},
|
|
162
|
+
journal = {Psychological Review},
|
|
163
|
+
volume = {84},
|
|
164
|
+
number = {3},
|
|
165
|
+
pages = {231--259},
|
|
166
|
+
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231},
|
|
167
|
+
abstract = {This influential paper challenges the validity of introspective reports about mental processes, presenting evidence that people have limited access to the origins of their thoughts and behaviors. The authors review numerous studies demonstrating that individuals are often unaware of the actual causes of their judgments, preferences, and decisions. They identify three levels of awareness: (1) unaware of a stimulus that influenced them, (2) unaware of their response, and (3) unaware that the stimulus affected the response. The paper argues that when people provide explanations for their behavior, they are not introspecting their mental processes but rather constructing plausible causal theories based on cultural and personal beliefs. This work has had profound implications for psychology, challenging assumptions about human self-knowledge and the reliability of self-report data. It has influenced diverse fields including social psychology, behavioral economics, and cognitive neuroscience, and has led to increased methodological rigor in psychological research.},
|
|
168
|
+
keywords = {introspection, metacognition, cognitive processes, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN}
|
|
169
|
+
}
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
@article{Wason1968Reasoning,
|
|
172
|
+
title = {Reasoning about a Rule},
|
|
173
|
+
author = {Wason, Peter C.},
|
|
174
|
+
year = {1968},
|
|
175
|
+
journal = {Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
|
|
176
|
+
volume = {20},
|
|
177
|
+
number = {3},
|
|
178
|
+
pages = {273--281},
|
|
179
|
+
doi = {10.1080/14640746808400161},
|
|
180
|
+
abstract = {This classic paper introduces the Wason selection task, a fundamental paradigm for studying deductive reasoning and hypothesis testing. Participants are presented with a conditional rule ("If a card has a vowel on one side, then it has an even number on the other side") and must select which cards to turn over to test the rule. The findings reveal a robust confirmation bias: participants consistently seek to confirm rather than falsify hypotheses, even when explicitly instructed to find counterexamples. The paper demonstrates that people are more successful when the task is framed in terms of social contracts or permission rules, suggesting that human reasoning is context-dependent. This work has had a profound impact on the study of reasoning, influencing theories of cognitive development, scientific thinking, and decision-making. The Wason selection task remains one of the most widely used tools in cognitive psychology for investigating how people test hypotheses and reason about conditional statements.},
|
|
181
|
+
keywords = {confirmation bias, reasoning, hypothesis testing, HUMMBL:IN, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
182
|
+
}
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
@article{Simons1999Gorilla,
|
|
185
|
+
title = {Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events},
|
|
186
|
+
author = {Simons, Daniel J. and Chabris, Christopher F.},
|
|
187
|
+
year = {1999},
|
|
188
|
+
journal = {Perception},
|
|
189
|
+
volume = {28},
|
|
190
|
+
number = {9},
|
|
191
|
+
pages = {1059--1074},
|
|
192
|
+
doi = {10.1068/p281059},
|
|
193
|
+
abstract = {This famous study demonstrates the phenomenon of inattentional blindness, where observers fail to notice unexpected but highly salient events when their attention is engaged in a demanding task. In the now-classic "invisible gorilla" experiment, participants watching a video of people passing basketballs often failed to notice a person in a gorilla suit walking through the scene. The research shows that when people focus attention on one aspect of a complex visual scene, they can fail to perceive other unexpected objects or events, even when they are looking directly at them. The paper examines factors that influence noticing rates, including the similarity of the unexpected object to attended items and the cognitive load of the primary task. These findings have important implications for understanding the limits of human attention and awareness, with applications in diverse fields including eyewitness testimony, aviation safety, and interface design. The study has become one of the most famous demonstrations in psychology, challenging common intuitions about perception and attention.},
|
|
194
|
+
keywords = {inattentional blindness, attention, perception, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:IN}
|
|
195
|
+
}
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
@book{Hutchins1995Cognition,
|
|
198
|
+
title = {Cognition in the Wild},
|
|
199
|
+
author = {Hutchins, Edwin},
|
|
200
|
+
year = {1995},
|
|
201
|
+
publisher = {MIT Press},
|
|
202
|
+
isbn = {978-0262581486},
|
|
203
|
+
doi = {10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001},
|
|
204
|
+
abstract = {This groundbreaking work introduces the theory of distributed cognition, arguing that cognitive processes are not confined to individual minds but are distributed across people, tools, and environments. Through detailed ethnographic study of navigation practices on a U.S. Navy vessel, Hutchins demonstrates how complex cognitive tasks are accomplished through the coordination of multiple individuals and artifacts. The book challenges traditional cognitive science by showing how cognition is fundamentally social and culturally organized, with knowledge embedded in tools, practices, and social structures. Key concepts include cognitive artifacts (tools that extend cognitive abilities), coordination of distributed systems, and the role of culture in shaping cognitive processes. The work has had profound implications for cognitive science, human-computer interaction, and organizational studies, offering a new framework for understanding cognition in real-world settings. The book remains a foundational text in situated and distributed approaches to cognition.},
|
|
205
|
+
keywords = {distributed cognition, situated cognition, navigation, HUMMBL:SY, HUMMBL:CO},
|
|
206
|
+
% Note: Previous DOI (10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001) was Simon's Sciences of the Artificial, not this book
|
|
207
|
+
}
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
@incollection{Klein1993Recognition,
|
|
210
|
+
title = {A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making},
|
|
211
|
+
author = {Klein, Gary A.},
|
|
212
|
+
year = {1993},
|
|
213
|
+
booktitle = {Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods},
|
|
214
|
+
editor = {Klein, Gary A. and Orasanu, Judith and Calderwood, Roberta and Zsambok, Caroline E.},
|
|
215
|
+
publisher = {Ablex Publishing},
|
|
216
|
+
pages = {138--147},
|
|
217
|
+
abstract = {This paper presents the Recognition-Primed Decision model, which describes how experienced practitioners make rapid decisions under time pressure without comparing options. Through naturalistic observation of firefighters, military commanders, and critical care nurses, Klein found that experts do not deliberate between alternatives but instead recognize familiar patterns in the situation and mentally simulate a course of action. If the simulation reveals problems, they modify the action; if not, they execute immediately. The RPD model identifies three variations: simple match (immediate recognition), diagnose the situation (when the pattern is ambiguous), and evaluate a course of action (mental simulation). This work founded the field of Naturalistic Decision Making and directly challenges laboratory-based models of rational choice. For HUMMBL, the RPD model explains how AI-augmented founders can make faster decisions: the system provides pattern recognition through briefings and historical data, while the human applies domain expertise for mental simulation and judgment under uncertainty.},
|
|
218
|
+
keywords = {naturalistic decision making, pattern recognition, expertise, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:P}
|
|
219
|
+
}
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
@article{Ericsson1995LongTerm,
|
|
222
|
+
title = {Long-Term Working Memory},
|
|
223
|
+
author = {Ericsson, K. Anders and Kintsch, Walter},
|
|
224
|
+
year = {1995},
|
|
225
|
+
journal = {Psychological Review},
|
|
226
|
+
volume = {102},
|
|
227
|
+
number = {2},
|
|
228
|
+
pages = {211--245},
|
|
229
|
+
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211},
|
|
230
|
+
abstract = {This paper introduces the theory of long-term working memory (LT-WM), proposing that skilled performers in a domain develop retrieval structures that allow them to rapidly encode and retrieve information from long-term memory, effectively expanding their working memory capacity for domain-relevant information. Through studies of expert text comprehension, mental calculation, and medical diagnosis, the authors show that experts build elaborate retrieval cues during encoding that enable reliable, rapid access to stored information when needed. The theory resolves the paradox of how experts handle complex tasks that seemingly exceed the limits of short-term memory. For hummbl-dev, LT-WM provides the cognitive science foundation for the Cognitive Ledger Protocol: just as experts build retrieval structures to extend working memory, the CLP's BM25 index, boot context injection, and five-pool retriever create an artificial LT-WM that allows AI agents to access relevant prior experience beyond their context window limits.},
|
|
231
|
+
keywords = {working memory, expertise, retrieval structures, HUMMBL:CO, HUMMBL:RE}
|
|
232
|
+
}
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
@article{BrownCollinsDuguid1989Situated,
|
|
235
|
+
title = {Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning},
|
|
236
|
+
author = {Brown, John Seely and Collins, Allan and Duguid, Paul},
|
|
237
|
+
year = {1989},
|
|
238
|
+
journal = {Educational Researcher},
|
|
239
|
+
volume = {18},
|
|
240
|
+
number = {1},
|
|
241
|
+
pages = {32--42},
|
|
242
|
+
doi = {10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2},
|
|
243
|
+
abstract = {This influential paper argues that knowledge is situated -- fundamentally bound to the activity, context, and culture in which it is developed and used. The authors demonstrate that abstract, decontextualized instruction fails because it divorces knowledge from the situations that give it meaning. They introduce the concept of cognitive apprenticeship, where learners acquire knowledge through authentic activity in the context of its use, guided by more experienced practitioners. The paper draws an analogy between learning tools and learning concepts: just as a tool's meaning comes from its use in practice, a concept's meaning comes from its deployment in authentic situations. This work has had lasting impact on educational design, workplace learning, and knowledge management. For HUMMBL, situated cognition validates the design of the coordination bus as a learning environment: agents acquire operational knowledge not through static documentation but through situated participation in real coordination activities, with the bus providing the authentic context that gives concepts their meaning.},
|
|
244
|
+
keywords = {situated cognition, cognitive apprenticeship, authentic activity, HUMMBL:P, HUMMBL:CO}
|
|
245
|
+
}
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
@article{Sternberg1999Successful,
|
|
248
|
+
title = {The Theory of Successful Intelligence},
|
|
249
|
+
author = {Sternberg, Robert J.},
|
|
250
|
+
year = {1999},
|
|
251
|
+
journal = {Review of General Psychology},
|
|
252
|
+
volume = {3},
|
|
253
|
+
number = {4},
|
|
254
|
+
pages = {292--316},
|
|
255
|
+
doi = {10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292},
|
|
256
|
+
abstract = {This paper presents the theory of successful intelligence, which defines intelligence as the ability to achieve success in life according to one's personal standards, within one's sociocultural context, by capitalizing on strengths and compensating for weaknesses. Sternberg identifies three interrelated aspects: analytical intelligence (the ability to analyze, evaluate, and compare), creative intelligence (the ability to create, invent, and discover), and practical intelligence (the ability to apply, implement, and use knowledge in real-world contexts). The theory challenges traditional IQ-based conceptions by demonstrating that practical and creative abilities predict real-world success independently of analytical abilities. Sternberg provides empirical evidence from studies of business managers, military leaders, and academics showing that the three abilities are partially independent and jointly predict performance better than any single measure. For HUMMBL, the triarchic model maps to the Base120 transformation types: analytical intelligence corresponds to Decomposition and Inversion, creative intelligence to Composition and Recursion, and practical intelligence to Perspective and Systems thinking.},
|
|
257
|
+
keywords = {successful intelligence, triarchic theory, practical intelligence, HUMMBL:DE, HUMMBL:SY}
|
|
258
|
+
}
|