hummbl-bibliography 1.0.0

package/mappings/arcana_citations.json

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+{
+  "_meta": {
+    "version": "0.1.0",
+    "generated": "2026-04-09",
+    "description": "Mapping of ARCANA agent lenses to HUMMBL bibliography entries. Each lens lists primary (most directly grounding) and secondary (adjacent/supporting) citations. Only keys that exist in the bibliography are listed.",
+    "coverage_note": "The bibliography is optimized for AI governance and engineering (T4, T5, T7, T11). ARCANA lenses requiring deep social theory (Weber, Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu, Marx) are weakly supported and are primary candidates for T2 or future expansion entries.",
+    "query_usage": "node toolkit/src/query.js --keyword HUMMBL:BKI --format json"
+  },
+
+  "ashby": {
+    "lens": "Cybernetician — Requisite Variety, homeostasis, viable systems",
+    "primary": ["Ashby1956Cybernetics", "Wiener1961Cybernetics", "Beer1981Brain"],
+    "secondary": ["Maturana1980Autopoiesis", "Meadows2008ThinkingSystems"],
+    "gaps": "No Ashby 'Design for a Brain' entry. Beer's VSM is covered."
+  },
+
+  "bateson": {
+    "lens": "Ecologist of Mind — double bind, levels of learning, cybernetics",
+    "primary": ["Wiener1961Cybernetics", "Ashby1956Cybernetics"],
+    "secondary": ["Meadows2008ThinkingSystems", "Maturana1980Autopoiesis"],
+    "gaps": "No direct Bateson entry ('Steps to an Ecology of Mind'). Strong gap — add to T2 or T12."
+  },
+
+  "bki": {
+    "lens": "Belonging as Knowledge Infrastructure — neurobiological prerequisites for cognition",
+    "primary": ["Edmondson1999PsychologicalSafety", "Nonaka1994KnowledgeCreation", "Walsh1991OrganizationalMemory"],
+    "secondary": ["Wegner1987TransactiveMemory", "CannonBowers1993SharedMentalModels", "Klein2005CommonGround", "Hollan2000DistributedCognition"],
+    "gaps": "No Walton+Cohen belonging uncertainty entry. No Bourdieu habitus entry. BKI Proposition 1 (neurobiological) weakly supported — add Cozolino or Lieberman on social neuroscience."
+  },
+
+  "bostrom": {
+    "lens": "Futurist of Existential Risk — superintelligence, control problem, simulation",
+    "primary": ["Bostrom2014Superintelligence", "Russell2019HumanCompatible"],
+    "secondary": ["Christiano2017DeepRL", "HadfieldMenell2017OffSwitch", "Bai2022Constitutional", "NISTRMF2023"],
+    "gaps": "No simulation argument or existential risk survey entry beyond Bostrom's own book."
+  },
+
+  "bourdieu": {
+    "lens": "Field Theorist — habitus, cultural capital, symbolic violence",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Kuhn1996Structure", "Walsh1991OrganizationalMemory"],
+    "gaps": "CRITICAL GAP — no Bourdieu entries in bibliography. Add 'Outline of a Theory of Practice' (1977) and 'Distinction' (1984) to T2 or new T14."
+  },
+
+  "burnham": {
+    "lens": "Managerial Revolutionary — separation of ownership and control, technocracy",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Simon1996Sciences"],
+    "gaps": "CRITICAL GAP — no Burnham entry ('The Managerial Revolution', 1941). Strong candidate for T1 expansion."
+  },
+
+  "chomsky": {
+    "lens": "Propaganda Analyst — manufacturing consent, political economy of media",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Zuboff2019SurveillanceCapitalism"],
+    "gaps": "No Chomsky entry. 'Manufacturing Consent' (1988) should be in T1 or T2."
+  },
+
+  "derrida": {
+    "lens": "Deconstructionist — différance, logocentrism, supplement",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": [],
+    "gaps": "No Derrida entries. Low coverage in continental philosophy overall."
+  },
+
+  "foucault": {
+    "lens": "Archaeologist of Power — power/knowledge, discourse, biopolitics",
+    "primary": ["Raji2020Auditing", "Mitchell2019ModelCards", "Gebru2021Datasheets"],
+    "secondary": ["Floridi2018AI4People", "Li2023TrustworthyAI"],
+    "gaps": "No direct Foucault entry. Raji/Mitchell/Gebru represent his power-analysis in the AI domain. Add 'Discipline and Punish' or 'Power/Knowledge' to T2."
+  },
+
+  "gramsci": {
+    "lens": "Left Mirror — hegemony, organic intellectuals, war of position",
+    "primary": ["Kuhn1996Structure"],
+    "secondary": ["Floridi2018AI4People"],
+    "gaps": "No Gramsci entry. 'Selections from the Prison Notebooks' should be in T1 or T2."
+  },
+
+  "habermas": {
+    "lens": "Communicative Rationalist — public sphere, discourse ethics, communicative action",
+    "primary": ["Floridi2018AI4People", "Brundage2020Verifiable"],
+    "secondary": ["NISTRMF2023", "EUAIAct2024"],
+    "gaps": "No direct Habermas entry. Floridi's AI4People framework is Habermasian in structure. Add 'The Theory of Communicative Action' to T2."
+  },
+
+  "heidegger": {
+    "lens": "Ontologist — Being-in-the-world, enframing, authenticity",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Rittel1973WickedProblems"],
+    "gaps": "No Heidegger entry. 'The Question Concerning Technology' is highly relevant to AI governance framing."
+  },
+
+  "ibn_khaldun": {
+    "lens": "Civilizational Historian — asabiyyah, Khaldun Cycle, economic foundations of power",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Taleb2007BlackSwan"],
+    "gaps": "No Ibn Khaldun entry ('Muqaddimah'). Unique non-Western voice — strong candidate for T1 expansion."
+  },
+
+  "kissinger": {
+    "lens": "Grand Strategist — balance of power, realpolitik, international order",
+    "primary": ["EUAIAct2024", "NISTRMF2023"],
+    "secondary": ["Brundage2020Verifiable"],
+    "gaps": "No Kissinger entry. 'World Order' (2014) or 'The Age of AI' (2021) relevant for geopolitics of AI."
+  },
+
+  "land": {
+    "lens": "Accelerationist — techno-capital acceleration, hyperstition, Dark Enlightenment",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Taleb2007BlackSwan", "Meadows2008ThinkingSystems"],
+    "gaps": "No Land entry. Intentionally marginal — represent via adjacent complexity/emergence literature."
+  },
+
+  "luhmann": {
+    "lens": "Systems Theorist — autopoiesis, functional differentiation, social systems",
+    "primary": ["Luhmann1981Zettelkasten", "Maturana1980Autopoiesis"],
+    "secondary": ["Meadows2008ThinkingSystems", "Ashby1956Cybernetics", "Beer1981Brain", "Park2023GenerativeAgents"],
+    "gaps": "Zettelkasten entry covers cognition angle. No 'Social Systems' (1984) or 'Theory of Society' entry. Add to T12 or T2. Park2023 adds autopoietic agent simulation."
+  },
+
+  "marx": {
+    "lens": "Historical Materialist — base/superstructure, alienation, class struggle",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Akerlof1970Lemons"],
+    "gaps": "No Marx entry. 'Capital Vol. 1' relevant for AI labor displacement framing."
+  },
+
+  "mcluhan": {
+    "lens": "Medium Theorist — the medium is the message, hot/cool media, extensions of man",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Licklider1960ManComputer"],
+    "gaps": "No McLuhan entry. 'Understanding Media' (1964) essential for AI-as-medium analysis."
+  },
+
+  "measurement": {
+    "lens": "Metrologist — Goodhart's Law, Campbell's Law, proxy metrics",
+    "primary": ["Liang2023HELM", "Liu2024AgentBench", "Jimenez2024SWEBench"],
+    "secondary": ["Mitchell2019ModelCards", "Gebru2021Datasheets", "Sculley2015TechDebt"],
+    "gaps": "No direct Goodhart/Campbell entry. HELM and AgentBench are concrete implementations of measurement theory applied to LLMs."
+  },
+
+  "nietzsche": {
+    "lens": "Genealogist — will to power, perspectivism, ressentiment, nihilism",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Kuhn1996Structure"],
+    "gaps": "No Nietzsche entry. 'On the Genealogy of Morals' (1887) is the source text."
+  },
+
+  "pareto": {
+    "lens": "Elite Theorist — circulation of elites, Lions vs Foxes, 80/20",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Taleb2007BlackSwan", "Akerlof1970Lemons"],
+    "gaps": "No Pareto entry. Add 'The Mind and Society' (1935) or cite via Burnham."
+  },
+
+  "popper": {
+    "lens": "Falsificationist — critical rationalism, falsification, open society",
+    "primary": ["Kuhn1996Structure"],
+    "secondary": ["Pearl2009Causality", "Floridi2018AI4People"],
+    "gaps": "Kuhn is Popper's key interlocutor. No direct Popper entry — add 'The Logic of Scientific Discovery' to T1."
+  },
+
+  "schmitt": {
+    "lens": "Jurist of the Exception — sovereignty, friend/enemy, state of exception",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["EUAIAct2024", "Sandhu1996RBAC"],
+    "gaps": "No Schmitt entry. Kill-switch and governance authority patterns are Schmittian in structure."
+  },
+
+  "strauss": {
+    "lens": "Careful Reader — esoteric writing, persecution, natural right vs historicism",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Kuhn1996Structure"],
+    "gaps": "No Strauss entry. Represent via Kuhn (paradigm concealment) and close-reading methodology."
+  },
+
+  "taleb": {
+    "lens": "Uncertainty Theorist — antifragility, black swans, skin in the game, fat tails",
+    "primary": ["Taleb2007BlackSwan"],
+    "secondary": ["Meadows2008ThinkingSystems", "Sculley2015TechDebt"],
+    "gaps": "'The Black Swan' is in T1. No 'Antifragile' (2012) entry — strong addition for T1 or T9."
+  },
+
+  "veblen": {
+    "lens": "Institutional Economist — conspicuous consumption, pecuniary emulation, engineers vs price system",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Akerlof1970Lemons", "VonNeumann1944GameTheory"],
+    "gaps": "No Veblen entry. 'The Theory of the Leisure Class' (1899) relevant for AI status signaling analysis."
+  },
+
+  "weber": {
+    "lens": "Sociologist of Rationalization — bureaucracy, iron cage, charismatic vs rational-legal authority",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Simon1996Sciences", "Walsh1991OrganizationalMemory"],
+    "gaps": "CRITICAL GAP — no Weber entry. 'Economy and Society' or 'The Protestant Ethic' essential for governance rationalization analysis."
+  },
+
+  "yarvin": {
+    "lens": "Reactionary Engineer — neoreaction, Cathedral critique, patchwork governance",
+    "primary": [],
+    "secondary": ["Kuhn1996Structure", "Taleb2007BlackSwan"],
+    "gaps": "No Yarvin/Moldbug entry (blog-native, no academic publication). Represent via Burnham (managerial revolution thesis) and Pareto (elite circulation)."
+  },
+
+  "zuboff": {
+    "lens": "Surveillance Capitalism Analyst — behavioral modification, prediction imperative, instrumentarian power",
+    "primary": ["Zuboff2019SurveillanceCapitalism"],
+    "secondary": ["GDPR2016", "EUAIAct2024", "Raji2020Auditing"],
+    "gaps": "Zuboff's book is in bibliography. Strong coverage for this lens."
+  },
+
+  "synthesist": {
+    "lens": "ARCANA Coordinator — cross-domain synthesis, convergence mapping",
+    "primary": ["Pearl2009Causality", "Meadows2008ThinkingSystems", "Hofstadter1979Godel"],
+    "secondary": ["Kuhn1996Structure", "Taleb2007BlackSwan", "Simon1996Sciences"],
+    "gaps": "No direct synthesis methodology entry beyond Pearl's causal calculus."
+  }
+}

package/mappings/bki_evidence.json

@@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
+{
+  "_meta": {
+    "version": "0.1.0",
+    "generated": "2026-04-09",
+    "description": "Bibliography evidence mapping for BKI (Belonging as Knowledge Infrastructure) framework. Maps each of the 4 BKI propositions and the Biocognitive OS / Broccolilly Equation to supporting bibliography entries. Entries marked PRESENT exist in the bibliography; entries marked MISSING are recommended additions.",
+    "bki_summary": "BKI holds that belonging is the structural precondition for knowledge creation, transmission, and transformation. Governance frameworks delivered into low-belonging environments produce compliance theater, not behavioral change. HUMMBL creates the belonging infrastructure (transparency, receipts, trust scores) that makes AI governance adoption possible.",
+    "query_usage": "node toolkit/src/query.js --search 'psychological safety' --format json"
+  },
+
+  "proposition_1_cognitive_scaffolding": {
+    "claim": "Belonging is a neurobiological prerequisite for higher-order cognition. Low-belonging triggers amygdala threat response, suppressing prefrontal cortex activity and preventing abstraction.",
+    "evidence_tags": ["HUMMBL:BKI"],
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Helmreich1999CRM",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "CRM (Crew Resource Management) training reduces error rates by creating psychological safety for junior crew members to challenge senior officers — direct empirical support for belonging as prerequisite for performance",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical_applied"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Salas2005BigFive",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Team effectiveness meta-analysis; identifies trust and mutual performance monitoring as prerequisites for adaptive behavior — behavioral analogue of belonging condition",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "meta_analysis"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "ONeill2022HumanAutonomy",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Human-autonomy teaming; trust calibration affects cognitive engagement — low trust = cognitive disengagement, parallels low-belonging → prefrontal suppression",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Edmondson1999PsychologicalSafety",
+        "why": "Edmondson's foundational study of 51 work teams: psychological safety predicts team performance (β=0.67) through team learning behavior (β=0.80). NOTE: prior BKI claim of '+35% complex problem-solving' is a PHANTOM — does not appear in any Edmondson primary source (verified 2026-05-07 via dedicated audit lane). Use β=0.67/0.80 framing or directional language only.",
+        "citation": "Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999",
+        "priority": "CRITICAL — add to T10 or T2",
+        "audit_status": "VERIFIED (citation); PHANTOM (any +35% claim attributed to Edmondson must be removed)"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Walton2011BelongingUncertainty",
+        "why": "Walton & Cohen 2011: brief belonging intervention; the 0.28 standardized GPA coefficient was specific to African-American students at a single private university (N=92). NOTE: prior BKI framing of '+0.3 SD academic achievement' is APPROXIMATE / MISREAD — never a population-level effect size. Cite paired with Walton 2023 (below) for context-conditional framing, which is the stronger match for BKI's argument.",
+        "citation": "Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. doi:10.1126/science.1198364",
+        "priority": "HIGH — add to T2 or T8",
+        "audit_status": "APPROXIMATE — pair with Walton2023MultiSite for canonical use"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Walton2023MultiSite",
+        "why": "Multi-site replication: 22 institutions, n=26,911. Belonging intervention effect is CONTEXT-CONDITIONAL — works only where institutional context affords genuine belonging opportunities; null/negative in unsupportive contexts. This conditionality IS the BKI argument and is materially stronger than the 2011 single-site framing. Use as the load-bearing belonging-intervention citation; cite 2011 as the foundational predecessor.",
+        "citation": "Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., Logel, C., Yeager, D. S., et al. (2023). Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college? Science, 380(6644), 499–505. doi:10.1126/science.ade4420",
+        "priority": "HIGH — load-bearing replacement for Walton2011 single-cite",
+        "audit_status": "VERIFIED — strongest available belonging-intervention citation"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Nolan2008NeighborsEnergy",
+        "why": "Field experiment showing neighbors' energy-conservation behavior was the #1 most powerful subsequent influence on consumer behavior, despite consumers rating it the LEAST influential. Provides primary empirical anchor for the 'context > stated values' comparative-strength claim that HUMMBL pitches often attribute to Cialdini or Thaler/Sunstein generically. Use Nolan 2008 as primary; cite Cialdini and Thaler/Sunstein as overarching frameworks.",
+        "citation": "Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923. doi:10.1177/0146167208316691",
+        "priority": "HIGH — primary source for context-vs-stated-values pitch claim",
+        "audit_status": "VERIFIED — added 2026-05-07 from cite-audit follow-through"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Bourdieu1977Outline",
+        "why": "Habitus and practical sense — practical knowledge cannot be acquired through instruction alone; it forms through participation in a community. Foundational for BKI Proposition 3 (Embodied Knowing). Audit flagged Bourdieu as CRITICAL missing entry; not currently in BKI_GOVERNANCE_DRAFT.md but referenced in skill register.",
+        "citation": "Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)",
+        "priority": "HIGH — fills CRITICAL gap flagged in original evidence map",
+        "audit_status": "THEORETICAL — canonical philosophy; cite directly as interpretive application"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "LiebermanSocial2013",
+        "why": "Lieberman 'Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect' — neurobiological basis for social threat/reward. Provides the amygdala/PFC mechanism claimed in Proposition 1.",
+        "citation": "Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. Crown.",
+        "priority": "MODERATE — add to T6 or T2"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "B",
+    "coverage_note": "Behavioral analogues present (CRM, team effectiveness); direct neurobiological evidence missing. Edmondson is the critical gap."
+  },
+
+  "proposition_2_relational_validation": {
+    "claim": "Knowledge claims gain authority through belonging networks, not logical validity alone. A correct framework delivered by an outsider is processed as threat, not knowledge.",
+    "evidence_tags": ["HUMMBL:BKI", "HUMMBL:CO"],
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Wenger1998CommunitiesPractice",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Communities of Practice — belonging to the community of practice is prerequisite for knowledge legitimacy. Core support for Proposition 2.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "BrownCollinsDuguid1989Situated",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T2",
+        "relevance": "Situated learning — knowledge is inseparable from the community context in which it is enacted. Authority flows through practice membership.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Lave1991SituatedLearning",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Legitimate peripheral participation — newcomers gain knowledge authority only through legitimate participation in community, not instruction alone.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "ethnographic"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Klein2005CommonGround",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Common ground theory — shared knowledge requires common ground established through belonging; expert-to-novice knowledge transfer fails without it.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Nonaka1994KnowledgeCreation",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "SECI model — socialization (tacit-to-tacit transfer) requires shared experience and trust; ba (shared space) is a belonging-equivalent construct.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Bourdieu1977Practice",
+        "why": "Bourdieu's habitus — the embodied dispositions that allow one to 'play the game' in a field. Proposition 2 is essentially a BKI restatement of symbolic violence: outsiders cannot have their knowledge claims recognized because they lack the field-specific capital.",
+        "citation": "Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511812507",
+        "priority": "CRITICAL — add to T2 or new T14"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "A-",
+    "coverage_note": "Strong coverage from situated cognition tradition. Bourdieu would add the sociological mechanism; absence noted."
+  },
+
+  "proposition_3_embodied_knowing": {
+    "claim": "Wisdom transmits somatically through belonging relationships. Instructional delivery transmits propositional content only; it cannot reach embodied/habitual knowledge.",
+    "evidence_tags": ["HUMMBL:BKI"],
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Schon1983ReflectivePractitioner",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T1",
+        "relevance": "Reflection-in-action and knowing-in-action — tacit professional knowledge cannot be reduced to explicit rules; it is enacted through practice. Direct support for Proposition 3.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Hutchins1995Cognition",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T2",
+        "relevance": "Distributed cognition — knowledge is embedded in practices, artifacts, and social relationships, not reducible to individual propositional content.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "ethnographic"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Hollan2000DistributedCognition",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Distributed cognition framework — extends Hutchins; knowledge structure is distributed across people and environment, somatic dimension included.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Senge1990FifthDiscipline",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T1",
+        "relevance": "Mental models and shared vision — organizational learning requires shared mental models developed through relational practice, not instruction alone.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "practitioner_theoretical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Polanyi1966TacitDimension",
+        "why": "Polanyi 'The Tacit Dimension' — the foundational source for tacit knowledge. 'We know more than we can tell.' Proposition 3 rests on this claim.",
+        "citation": "Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press. (No registered DOI; pre-DOI monograph.)",
+        "priority": "HIGH — add to T1 or T2"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Dreyfus1980MindOverMachine",
+        "why": "Dreyfus and Dreyfus stage model of skill acquisition — expertise cannot be reduced to rule following; embodied practice is the necessary path.",
+        "citation": "Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine. Free Press.",
+        "priority": "MODERATE — add to T2 or T6"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "B+",
+    "coverage_note": "Distributed cognition well-covered. Polanyi is the foundational gap; Schon partially compensates."
+  },
+
+  "proposition_4_symbolic_systems": {
+    "claim": "Shared symbolic languages emerge FROM belonging structures, not the reverse. Imposing vocabulary before belonging inverts the causal arrow.",
+    "evidence_tags": ["HUMMBL:BKI", "HUMMBL:CO"],
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Wenger1998CommunitiesPractice",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Reification and participation — symbols and shared language emerge from participation in communities of practice, not from top-down definition.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Walsh1991OrganizationalMemory",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Organizational memory — shared interpretive schemes (analogous to symbolic systems) develop through organizational socialization, not instruction.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Nonaka1994KnowledgeCreation",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Externalization in SECI model — explicit symbols emerge from tacit knowledge through dialogue and metaphor; ba (belonging space) is prerequisite.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Wegner1987TransactiveMemory",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Transactive memory — shared encoding/retrieval systems develop in close relationships; shared symbolic structure is a relational artifact.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Vygotsky1978MindSociety",
+        "why": "Vygotsky — zone of proximal development and the social origin of cognitive tools. Language and symbolic systems emerge through social interaction before becoming internalized. Foundational support for Proposition 4.",
+        "citation": "Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press.",
+        "priority": "HIGH — add to T2 or T8"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "B+",
+    "coverage_note": "Strong coverage from CoP and organizational memory. Vygotsky fills the developmental/linguistic origin gap."
+  },
+
+  "biocognitive_os": {
+    "claim": "Humans shift through 6 cognitive modes depending on belonging conditions. Belonging determines which modes are accessible. Governance training delivered into threat-state environments is irretrievable.",
+    "modes": ["Sensory", "Emotive", "Cognitive", "Somatic", "Relational", "Temporal"],
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Endsley1995SituationAwareness",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Situation awareness levels 1-3 — under stress (low belonging), operators regress to Level 1 perception only; complex integration (Level 3) requires cognitive safety.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "ONeill2022HumanAutonomy",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Trust calibration in human-autonomy teaming — over/undertrust corresponds to mode collapse in the Biocognitive OS model.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "PorgesPolyvagalTheory2011",
+        "why": "Porges' Polyvagal Theory — provides the neurobiological mechanism for the Biocognitive OS. Autonomic nervous system states (safe/danger/life-threat) directly map to the 6-mode framework.",
+        "citation": "Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. Norton.",
+        "priority": "HIGH — add to T6 or T2"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Csikszentmihalyi1990Flow",
+        "why": "Flow state — optimal cognitive mode requires belonging-equivalent conditions (clear goals, feedback, challenge-skill balance). The Biocognitive OS Cognitive mode maps to flow.",
+        "citation": "Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper.",
+        "priority": "MODERATE — add to T3 or T8"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "C+",
+    "coverage_note": "Significant gap. The Biocognitive OS is a novel framework without direct bibliography support. Porges and Csikszentmihalyi provide the closest grounding."
+  },
+
+  "broccolilly_equation": {
+    "claim": "S × T × I × C × D = R (Sovereignty × Trust × Integration × Clarity × Depth = Result). Multiplicative: zero in any factor yields zero result.",
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Salas2005BigFive",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Team effectiveness meta-analysis identifies trust, leadership (sovereignty), and shared mental models (integration/clarity) as multiplicative factors.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "meta_analysis"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Bansal2019MentalModels",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "Mental model alignment affects team performance multiplicatively — when alignment is zero, performance collapses regardless of individual competence.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Ajzen1991TheoryPlannedBehavior",
+        "why": "Theory of Planned Behavior — provides the behavioral change multiplicative model that Broccolilly equation echoes. Attitude × norms × PBC = behavioral intention.",
+        "citation": "Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T",
+        "priority": "MODERATE — add to T2 or T8"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "C",
+    "coverage_note": "The Broccolilly Equation is a novel framework. Team effectiveness literature provides analogical support but no direct citation exists."
+  },
+
+  "hummbl_governance_failure_thesis": {
+    "claim": "Governance frameworks fail not because of technical deficiencies but because they are delivered into low-belonging environments. HUMMBL creates the belonging infrastructure that makes AI governance adoption structurally possible.",
+    "bibliography_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Helmreich1999CRM",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T10",
+        "relevance": "CRM implementation failures in aviation were solved by creating shared mental models and psychological safety, not better checklists. Direct analogue for HUMMBL thesis.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical_applied"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Wenger1998CommunitiesPractice",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T8",
+        "relevance": "Formal training programs fail to transmit practice; communities of practice succeed. Governance compliance theater vs governance internalization distinction maps here.",
+        "strength": "STRONG",
+        "evidence_type": "theoretical_empirical"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Floridi2018AI4People",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T6",
+        "relevance": "AI4People framework — identifies human/social prerequisites for AI ethics adoption; governance without human-centered foundation fails.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "normative"
+      },
+      {
+        "key": "Raji2020Auditing",
+        "status": "PRESENT",
+        "tier": "T6",
+        "relevance": "Internal AI auditing requires organizational belonging/trust infrastructure to function; audit findings without psychological safety are suppressed.",
+        "strength": "MODERATE",
+        "evidence_type": "empirical"
+      }
+    ],
+    "missing_entries": [
+      {
+        "key": "Edmondson1999PsychologicalSafety",
+        "why": "As above — the primary empirical support for why governance frameworks fail in low-safety environments.",
+        "citation": "Edmondson (1999). doi:10.2307/2666999",
+        "priority": "CRITICAL"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_grade": "B",
+    "coverage_note": "CRM and CoP provide strong empirical analogues. Edmondson is the critical missing direct citation."
+  },
+
+  "summary": {
+    "total_bki_entries_present": 14,
+    "total_missing_recommended": 9,
+    "critical_gaps": [
+      "Edmondson1999PsychologicalSafety — psychological safety in teams (T10 or T2)",
+      "Bourdieu1977Practice — habitus and field theory (T2 or new T14)",
+      "Polanyi1966TacitDimension — tacit knowledge foundational text (T1 or T2)"
+    ],
+    "high_priority_gaps": [
+      "Walton2011BelongingUncertainty — belonging intervention effect sizes",
+      "PorgesPolyvagalTheory2011 — neurobiological mechanism for Biocognitive OS",
+      "Vygotsky1978MindSociety — social origin of symbolic systems"
+    ],
+    "strongest_coverage_area": "Proposition 2 (Relational Validation) — situated cognition tradition is well-represented",
+    "weakest_coverage_area": "Biocognitive OS and Broccolilly Equation — novel frameworks without direct bibliography anchors",
+    "overall_grade": "B-",
+    "recommended_additions_count": 9
+  }
+}

package/package.json

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "name": "hummbl-bibliography",
+  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "description": "A curated bibliography for HUMMBL project",
+  "main": "index.js",
+  "scripts": {
+    "test": "echo \"No tests specified\" && exit 0",
+    "lint": "echo \"No linter configured\" && exit 0"
+  },
+  "repository": {
+    "type": "git",
+    "url": "git+https://github.com/hummbl-dev/hummbl-bibliography.git"
+  },
+  "keywords": [
+    "bibliography",
+    "hummbl",
+    "references"
+  ],
+  "author": "HUMMBL Team",
+  "license": "MIT",
+  "bugs": {
+    "url": "https://github.com/hummbl-dev/hummbl-bibliography/issues"
+  },
+  "homepage": "https://github.com/hummbl-dev/hummbl-bibliography#readme"
+}