forge-workflow 0.0.10 → 0.1.0-beta.3

package/docs/MANUAL_REVIEW_GUIDE.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
-# Manual Review Guide
-
-**Purpose**: Structured guidance for manual code review integrated with AI review tools.
-
-**Audience**: Developers conducting PR reviews, maintainers configuring review workflows.
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-Manual review remains essential even with AI-powered tools like Greptile and CodeRabbit. This guide provides a systematic approach to combine human judgment with AI insights for comprehensive code quality.
-
-**Review Philosophy**:
-- **AI First, Human Final**: Use AI tools for breadth, manual review for depth
-- **Structured Process**: Follow systematic checklist to avoid missing critical issues
-- **Context Matters**: Apply judgment based on project stage, risk, and complexity
-- **Documentation Required**: Every PR needs clear explanation of changes and reasoning
-
----
-
-## Review Workflow Integration
-
-This guide integrates with the Forge 9-Stage TDD Workflow:
-
-```
-/status → /research → /plan → /dev → /validate → /ship → /review → /premerge → /verify
-                                                           ↑
-                                                  You are here
-```
-
-### When to Use This Guide
-
-- **Stage 7 (/review)**: Address ALL PR feedback from GitHub Actions, Greptile, SonarCloud, and manual reviewers
-- **After AI Review**: When Greptile or CodeRabbit has completed initial analysis
-- **Before Merge**: Final verification before approving PR
-- **Post-Merge**: Documentation verification in /verify stage
-
-
-
-## Part 1: AI Review Tools Best Practices
-
-### Greptile - Semantic Understanding
-- Use .claude/scripts/greptile-resolve.sh for systematic thread handling
-- Always reply and resolve threads after fixes
-- See .claude/rules/greptile-review-process.md for detailed workflow
-
-### CodeRabbit - Multi-Model Review
-- Address security issues immediately
-- Consider performance suggestions with benchmarks
-- Apply style suggestions for consistency
-
-### SonarCloud - Static Analysis
-- Coverage ≥80% on new code
-- 0 security hotspots unreviewed
-- Use /sonarcloud skill for PR-specific issues
-
----
-
-## Part 2: Manual Review Checklist
-
-### 1. Functional Correctness
-- ☐ Code matches PR description
-- ☐ Edge cases handled
-- ☐ Error messages clear
-- ☐ Invalid input handled gracefully
-
-### 2. Security (OWASP Top 10)
-- ☐ Authorization before sensitive ops
-- ☐ Data encrypted at rest/transit
-- ☐ SQL queries parameterized
-- ☐ No code injection risks
-
-### 3. Testing Quality
-- ☐ Tests for new code
-- ☐ Edge cases covered
-- ☐ TDD compliance (test commits before feat commits)
-
-### 4. Code Quality
-- ☐ Self-documenting code
-- ☐ Single responsibility functions
-- ☐ No duplication (DRY)
-- ☐ Clear organization
-
-### 5. Performance
-- ☐ Efficient algorithms
-- ☐ Optimized queries
-- ☐ No memory leaks
-
-### 6. Documentation
-- ☐ Public APIs documented
-- ☐ PR explains why, not just what
-- ☐ README updated if needed
-
----
-
-## Summary
-
-**Manual Review Essentials**:
-- Use AI tools for pattern detection
-- Apply human judgment for context
-- Follow systematic checklist
-- Verify security, testing, documentation
-
-**Integration**: Stage 7 (/review) → Address ALL feedback systematically
-
-**Key**: Trust AI for breadth, humans for depth. Best results combine both.