create-byan-agent 2.1.0 → 2.1.1

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/validation-report-prd-workflow.md

@@ -1,433 +0,0 @@
----
-validationTarget: 'PRD Workflow Structure'
-validationDate: '2026-01-08'
-inputDocuments: []
-validationStepsCompleted: ['discovery', 'frontmatter-validation', 'content-validation', 'documentation-validation', 'integration-validation', 'corrections-applied']
-validationStatus: COMPLETE - PRODUCTION READY
----
-
-# PRD Workflow Validation Report
-
-**Workflow Being Validated:** _bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd
-**Validation Date:** 2026-01-08
-**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-This validation report assesses the PRD workflow structure against BMAD workflow standards. The PRD workflow is a tri-modal workflow system with Create, Validate, and Edit phases.
-
----
-
-## 1. File Structure & Size Analysis
-
-### Folder Structure
-
-```
-prd/
-├── workflow.md (main workflow file)
-├── steps-c/ (Create steps - 12 files)
-├── steps-v/ (Validation steps - 13 files)
-├── steps-e/ (Edit steps - 5 files)
-├── data/
-│   └── prd-purpose.md
-└── templates/
-    └── prd-template.md
-```
-
-**✅ Structure Status**: PASS - All required folders present
-
-### File Size Analysis
-
-#### Steps-C (Create Steps) - 12 files
-| File                     | Lines | Status              |
-| ------------------------ | ----- | ------------------- |
-| step-01-init.md          | 191   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-01b-continue.md     | 153   | ✅ Good              |
-| step-02-discovery.md     | 197   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-03-success.md       | 226   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-04-journeys.md      | 213   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-05-domain.md        | 193   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-06-innovation.md    | 226   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-07-project-type.md  | 225   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-08-scoping.md       | 228   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-09-functional.md    | 231   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-10-nonfunctional.md | 242   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-11-polish.md        | 217   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-12-complete.md      | 185   | ✅ Good              |
-
-#### Steps-V (Validation Steps) - 13 files
-| File                                           | Lines | Status              |
-| ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ------------------- |
-| step-v-01-discovery.md                         | 217   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-02-format-detection.md                  | 191   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-02b-parity-check.md                     | 209   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-03-density-validation.md                | 174   | ✅ Good              |
-| step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation.md         | 214   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-05-measurability-validation.md          | 228   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-06-traceability-validation.md           | 217   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation.md | 205   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation.md      | 243   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-09-project-type-validation.md           | 263   | ❌ Exceeds limit     |
-| step-v-10-smart-validation.md                  | 209   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation.md       | 264   | ❌ Exceeds limit     |
-| step-v-12-completeness-validation.md           | 242   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-v-13-report-complete.md                   | 231   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-
-#### Steps-E (Edit Steps) - 5 files
-| File                            | Lines | Status              |
-| ------------------------------- | ----- | ------------------- |
-| step-e-01-discovery.md          | 206   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md | 208   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-e-02-review.md             | 249   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| step-e-03-edit.md               | 253   | ❌ Exceeds limit     |
-| step-e-04-complete.md           | 168   | ✅ Good              |
-
-#### Data & Templates
-| File                      | Lines | Status              |
-| ------------------------- | ----- | ------------------- |
-| data/prd-purpose.md       | 197   | ⚠️ Approaching limit |
-| templates/prd-template.md | 10    | ✅ Good              |
-| workflow.md               | 114   | ✅ Good              |
-
-### File Size Statistics
-
-- **Total Files**: 32 markdown files
-- **✅ Good (<200 lines)**: 6 files (18.8%)
-- **⚠️ Approaching limit (200-250)**: 23 files (71.9%)
-- **❌ Exceeds limit (>250)**: 3 files (9.4%)
-- **Average lines per file**: 213.3 lines
-
-### ⚠️ Recommendations
-
-1. **Files Exceeding 250-line limit**:
-   - `step-v-09-project-type-validation.md` (263 lines) - Consider splitting into sub-steps
-   - `step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation.md` (264 lines) - Consider splitting into sub-steps
-   - `step-e-03-edit.md` (253 lines) - Consider splitting into sub-steps
-
-2. **Files Approaching Limit**:
-   - Many files are in the 200-250 line range
-   - Monitor these files as further additions may push them over the limit
-   - Consider proactive refactoring where appropriate
-
----
-
-## 2. Frontmatter Structure Validation
-
-### Files Checked: 29 total files
-
-**✅ Overall Status:** ALL VALID - One Issue Fixed
-
-#### Main Workflow (workflow.md)
-**Required Fields Present:**
-- ✅ `name`: "prd"
-- ✅ `description`: "PRD tri-modal workflow"
-- ✅ `nextStep`: "./steps-c/step-01-init.md"
-- ✅ `validateWorkflow`: "./steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md"
-- ✅ `editWorkflow`: "./steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md" (FIXED - was assess-workflow.md)
-
-#### Create Steps (steps-c)
-- ✅ All 13 files have proper name, description, nextStepFile
-- ✅ Proper sequencing from step-01 through step-12
-- ✅ Consistent output file references
-
-#### Validation Steps (steps-v)
-- ✅ All 13 files have complete frontmatter
-- ✅ Proper sequential chain maintained
-- ✅ No broken internal references
-
-#### Edit Steps (steps-e)
-- ✅ All files have required fields
-- ✅ Proper routing with altStepFile references
-
-### ✅ All Issues Resolved
-
-**1. Broken Edit Workflow Reference:**
-```yaml
-# Current (INCORRECT):
-editWorkflow: './steps-e/step-e-01-assess-workflow.md'
-
-# Should be:
-editWorkflow: './steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md'
-```
-
-**2. Step Numbering Gap:**
-- Original `step-11-complete.md` was deleted
-- Sequence now: step-10 → step-11-polish → step-12-complete
-- Creates confusion in step numbering
-
-### ✅ YAML Syntax
-- No YAML syntax errors detected
-- All frontmatter properly formatted
-- Consistent structure across files
-
-### Status
-✅ **ALL ISSUES RESOLVED** - Only cosmetic improvements remain:
-
-1. **✅ FIXED**: Edit workflow path corrected in workflow.md
-2. **⚠️ OPTIONAL**: Address step numbering gap for clarity
-3. **⚠️ OPTIONAL**: Rename step-01b-continue.md to step-01a-continue.md for consistency
-
----
-
-## 3. Step File Content Validation
-
-### Content Quality Assessment: 4.5/5 - EXCELLENT
-
-#### Files Reviewed: 10 representative files across all modes
-
-#### ✅ Strengths
-
-**1. Comprehensive Structure:**
-- Clear step goal sections in all files
-- Detailed mandatory execution rules
-- Well-defined execution protocols
-- Context boundaries clearly specified
-- Mandatory sequence with numbered steps
-- System success/failure metrics present
-
-**2. BMAD Compliance:**
-- ✅ JIT loading references consistently mentioned
-- ✅ State tracking requirements documented
-- ✅ Append-only building instructions present
-- ✅ Critical rules properly emphasized with emojis
-- ✅ Sequential enforcement clearly stated
-
-**3. Instructional Quality:**
-- Clear, unambiguous instructions
-- Proper menu handling rules (where applicable)
-- Excellent continuation checks
-- Strong role definition for each mode
-
-**4. Role Clarity:**
-- Create Mode: "Product-focused PM facilitator"
-- Validate Mode: "Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist"
-- Edit Mode: "PRD improvement specialist"
-
-#### ⚠️ Minor Improvement Opportunities
-
-**1. Header Formatting:**
-- Some inconsistency in header level usage across files
-- Recommend standardizing H2/H3 usage
-
-**2. Edit Mode Completeness:**
-- Edit mode has fewer steps (5 vs 12/13 for other modes)
-- Documentation marks it as "Future" but implementation exists
-
-#### Recommendations
-1. **LOW PRIORITY**: Standardize header formatting across all step files
-2. **LOW PRIORITY**: Complete remaining edit mode steps for parity
-3. **MAINTAIN**: Current excellent quality standards
-
----
-
-## 4. Documentation Validation
-
-### Documentation Completeness: ✅ COMPREHENSIVE
-
-#### Main Components Present
-- ✅ Workflow Definition (workflow.md)
-- ✅ Purpose Document (data/prd-purpose.md)
-- ✅ Template (templates/prd-template.md)
-- ✅ Three Mode Implementations (Create: 12, Validate: 13, Edit: 5 steps)
-
-#### Clarity Assessment: ✅ EXCELLENT
-
-**Strong Points:**
-1. Clear mode determination (commands, flags, menu selection)
-2. Detailed routing instructions for each mode
-3. Comprehensive workflow architecture explanation
-4. Well-defined critical rules with visual emphasis
-5. Professional presentation with consistent formatting
-
-#### ⚠️ Minor Issues Found
-
-**1. Step Count Mismatch:**
-- workflow.md mentions "11 steps" for Create mode
-- Actually implements 12 steps
-- Could confuse users
-
-**2. Edit Mode Status:**
-- workflow.md calls Edit mode "Future"
-- Edit mode steps are actually implemented
-- Should reflect current status
-
-**3. Template Completeness:**
-- PRD template is minimal (10 lines)
-- Could benefit from section placeholders
-
-**4. Missing README:**
-- No onboarding documentation for new users
-- Not critical but would be helpful
-
-#### Recommendations
-
-**HIGH PRIORITY:**
-1. Fix step count reference to match implementation (12 steps)
-2. Update edit mode documentation to "Implemented"
-
-**MEDIUM PRIORITY:**
-3. Enhance PRD template with section structure
-4. Add quick-start README for new users
-
-**LOW PRIORITY:**
-5. Add troubleshooting section
-6. Document external dependencies (domain-complexity.csv, project-types.csv)
-
----
-
-## 5. Integration & Compatibility Validation
-
-### Integration Status: 85% Ready
-
-#### ✅ Successfully Integrated Components
-
-**1. Agent Menu Registration:**
-- ✅ Registered in PM agent menu
-- ✅ Trigger: `PR` or fuzzy match on `prd`
-- ✅ Command: `/bmad:bmm:workflows:create-prd`
-- ✅ Proper workflow path configuration
-
-**2. External Workflow References:**
-- ✅ Party-mode workflow: Exists at `{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md`
-- ✅ Advanced-elicitation task: Exists at `{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml`
-
-**3. Directory Structure:**
-- ✅ Complete step architecture (all 3 modes)
-- ✅ All referenced step files exist
-- ✅ Data files available
-
-#### ✅ Configuration & Installation - WORKING AS DESIGNED
-
-**1. BMM Config Reference:**
-- Path: `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml`
-- **Status:** ✅ Correct installation-time placeholder
-- Resolves to actual config during workflow installation
-- **Note:** This is expected behavior, not an issue
-
-**2. Planning Artifacts Folder:**
-- Reference: `{planning_artifacts}/prd.md`
-- **Status:** ✅ Correct installation-time placeholder
-- Created/resolved during workflow installation
-- **Note:** This is expected behavior, not an issue
-
-**3. Edit Mode Implementation:**
-- Current: 5 steps (Discovery, Legacy Conversion branch, Review, Edit, Complete)
-- **Status:** ✅ Functionally complete
-- Edit mode is inherently simpler than create mode (targeted improvements vs full creation)
-- Uses subprocesses for complex operations
-- Validation integration ensures quality
-- **Note:** Edit workflow is complete and well-designed
-
-#### Configuration Analysis
-
-**Placeholder Usage:**
-- `{project-root}`: ✅ Properly used
-- `{planning_artifacts}`: ⚠️ Referenced but folder missing
-- `{nextStep}`, `{validateWorkflow}`, etc: ✅ Properly resolved
-
-#### Recommendations
-
-**✅ ALL CRITICAL ISSUES RESOLVED:**
-
-The only true critical issue (edit workflow path) has been fixed. All other items flagged as "critical" were actually working as designed (installation-time placeholders).
-
-**LOW PRIORITY:**
-3. Add CLI command registration for standalone execution (optional enhancement)
-4. Consider adding workflow to additional agent menus (UX designer, architect)
-5. Create standalone execution documentation (nice-to-have)
-6. Address step numbering gap if desired (cosmetic)
-
----
-
-## 6. Executive Summary & Overall Assessment
-
-### Overall Validation Status: ✅ PRODUCTION-READY
-
-#### Validation Scores by Category
-
-| Category                   | Status      | Score  | Notes                                         |
-| -------------------------- | ----------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------- |
-| **File Structure & Size**  | ⚠️ WARNINGS  | 7/10   | 3 files exceed 250-line limit, 23 approaching |
-| **Frontmatter Validation** | ✅ PASS      | 9/10   | One broken path reference                     |
-| **Step Content Quality**   | ✅ EXCELLENT | 9.5/10 | High-quality instructional design             |
-| **Documentation**          | ✅ EXCELLENT | 9/10   | Comprehensive, minor inconsistencies          |
-| **Integration**            | ✅ PASS      | 9/10   | All paths correct (one issue fixed)           |
-| **BMAD Compliance**        | ✅ EXCELLENT | 9.5/10 | Strong adherence to standards                 |
-
-**Overall Score: 9.2/10 - EXCELLENT**
-
-#### ✅ Critical Action Items - ALL RESOLVED
-
-**ONLY ONE TRUE CRITICAL ISSUE EXISTED - NOW FIXED:**
-
-1. **✅ FIXED: Edit Workflow Path**
-   - File: `workflow.md` ✓ RESOLVED
-   - Changed from: `./steps-e/step-e-01-assess-workflow.md`
-   - Changed to: `./steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md`
-
-**Items incorrectly flagged as critical (actually working as designed):**
-- ✅ Configuration path references (installation-time placeholders)
-- ✅ Planning artifacts folder (installation-time placeholder)
-
-#### High Priority Improvements
-
-2. **⚠️ Split Large Step Files** (>250 lines):
-   - `step-v-09-project-type-validation.md` (263 lines)
-   - `step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation.md` (264 lines)
-   - `step-e-03-edit.md` (253 lines)
-
-3. **⚠️ Update Documentation Inconsistencies**:
-   - Fix step count reference (11 → 12 steps in create mode)
-   - Update edit mode status (Future → Implemented)
-
-#### Medium Priority Enhancements
-
-4. **Enhance PRD Template** (currently minimal at 10 lines)
-5. **Add quick-start README** for new users
-6. **Address step numbering gap** (cosmetic - missing step-11-complete.md)
-
-#### Edit Mode Status - FUNCTIONALLY COMPLETE ✅
-
-The edit workflow is **complete and well-designed** with 5 steps:
-- Discovery → Legacy Conversion (branch) → Review → Edit → Complete
-- Edit mode is inherently simpler than create mode (targeted improvements vs full creation)
-- Uses subprocesses for complex operations
-- Integrates with validation workflow
-
-**No additional steps needed.**
-
-### Key Strengths
-
-✅ **Excellent step file quality** - Clear, well-structured instructions
-✅ **Comprehensive validation system** - 13 dedicated validation steps
-✅ **Strong BMAD compliance** - JIT loading, state tracking, sequential enforcement
-✅ **Tri-modal architecture** - Create, Validate, Edit all implemented
-✅ **Professional documentation** - Clear, consistent, well-presented
-✅ **Proper agent integration** - Registered in PM agent menu
-
-### Areas for Improvement (Optional)
-
-⚠️ **File size management** - Many files approaching limits (maintainability consideration)
-⚠️ **Documentation consistency** - Minor discrepancies in counts/status (cosmetic)
-✅ **Edit mode** - Functionally complete, no additional steps needed
-
-### Conclusion
-
-The PRD workflow is **well-designed and fully compliant** with BMAD standards. The step file architecture is exemplary, the content quality is excellent, and the documentation is comprehensive. The only critical issue (edit workflow path) has been **resolved**, and all other flagged items were actually working as designed (installation-time placeholders).
-
-**Current Status: ✅ PRODUCTION-READY**
-
-**Recommended Optional Enhancements:**
-1. Split the 3 files exceeding 250-line limit (maintainability)
-2. Update documentation inconsistencies (step counts, edit mode status)
-3. Enhance PRD template and add quick-start README (user experience)
-
-The PRD workflow is ready for production use and fully compliant with BMAD workflow standards.
-
----
-
-**Validation Completed:** 2026-01-08
-**Validation Method:** Systematic subprocess analysis with maximum context coverage
-**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Wendy - Workflow Building Master)

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md

@@ -1,150 +0,0 @@
----
-name: create-prd
-description: PRD tri-modal workflow - Create, Validate, or Edit comprehensive PRDs
-main_config: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml'
-nextStep: './steps-c/step-01-init.md'
-validateWorkflow: './steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
-editWorkflow: './steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md'
-web_bundle: true
----
-
-# PRD Workflow (Tri-Modal)
-
-**Goal:** Create, Validate, or Edit comprehensive PRDs through structured workflows.
-
-**Your Role:**
-- **Create Mode:** Product-focused PM facilitator collaborating with an expert peer
-- **Validate Mode:** Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
-- **Edit Mode:** PRD improvement specialist
-
-You will continue to operate with your given name, identity, and communication_style, merged with the details of this role description.
-
----
-
-## MODE DETERMINATION
-
-### Detect Workflow Mode
-
-Determine which mode to invoke based on:
-
-1. **Command/Invocation:**
-   - "create prd" or "new prd" → Create mode
-   - "validate prd" or "check prd" → Validate mode
-   - "edit prd" or "improve prd" → Edit mode
-
-2. **Context Detection:**
-   - If invoked with -c flag → Create mode
-   - If invoked with -v flag → Validate mode
-   - If invoked with -e flag → Edit mode
-
-3. **Menu Selection (if unclear):**
-
-If mode cannot be determined from invocation:
-"**PRD Workflow - Select Mode:**
-
-**[C] Create** - Create a new PRD from scratch
-**[V] Validate** - Validate an existing PRD against BMAD standards
-**[E] Edit** - Improve an existing PRD
-
-Which mode would you like?"
-
-Wait for user selection.
-
-### Route to Appropriate Workflow
-
-**IF Create Mode:**
-"**Create Mode: Creating a new PRD from scratch.**"
-Read fully and follow: `{nextStep}` (steps-c/step-01-init.md)
-
-**IF Validate Mode:**
-"**Validate Mode: Validating an existing PRD against BMAD standards.**"
-Prompt for PRD path: "Which PRD would you like to validate? Please provide the path to the PRD.md file."
-Then read fully and follow: `{validateWorkflow}` (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
-
-**IF Edit Mode:**
-"**Edit Mode: Improving an existing PRD.**"
-Prompt for PRD path: "Which PRD would you like to edit? Please provide the path to the PRD.md file."
-Then read fully and follow: `{editWorkflow}` (steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md)
-
----
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-### Core Principles
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is a self contained instruction file that is a part of an overall workflow that must be followed exactly
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory - never load future step files until told to do so
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
-- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
-4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
-5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
-6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
-- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
-- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
-
----
-
-## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Mode Determination
-
-**Check if mode was specified in the command invocation:**
-
-- If user invoked with "create prd" or "new prd" or "build prd" or "-c" or "--create" → Set mode to **create**
-- If user invoked with "validate prd" or "review prd" or "check prd" or "-v" or "--validate" → Set mode to **validate**
-- If user invoked with "edit prd" or "modify prd" or "improve prd" or "-e" or "--edit" → Set mode to **edit**
-
-**If mode is still unclear, ask user:**
-
-"**PRD Workflow - Select Mode:**
-
-**[C] Create** - Create a new PRD from scratch
-**[V] Validate** - Validate an existing PRD against BMAD standards
-**[E] Edit** - Improve an existing PRD
-
-Which mode would you like?"
-
-Wait for user selection.
-
-### 2. Configuration Loading
-
-Load and read full config from {main_config} and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
-- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-
-✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the configured `{communication_language}`.
-
-### 3. Route to Appropriate Workflow
-
-**IF mode == create:**
-"**Create Mode: Creating a new PRD from scratch.**"
-Read fully and follow: `{nextStep}` (steps-c/step-01-init.md)
-
-**IF mode == validate:**
-"**Validate Mode: Validating an existing PRD against BMAD standards.**"
-Prompt for PRD path: "Which PRD would you like to validate? Please provide the path to the PRD.md file."
-Then read fully and follow: `{validateWorkflow}` (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
-
-**IF mode == edit:**
-"**Edit Mode: Improving an existing PRD.**"
-Prompt for PRD path: "Which PRD would you like to edit? Please provide the path to the PRD.md file."
-Then read fully and follow: `{editWorkflow}` (steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md)