npm - create-byan-agent - Versions diffs - 2.1.0 → 2.1.1 - Mend

create-byan-agent 2.1.0 → 2.1.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (751) hide show

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-08-scoping.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,228 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-08-scoping'
-description: 'Define MVP boundaries and prioritize features across development phases'
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-09-functional.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/prd.md'
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-# Step 8: Scoping Exercise - MVP & Future Features
-**Progress: Step 8 of 11** - Next: Functional Requirements
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
-- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between PM peers
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- 💬 FOCUS on strategic scope decisions that keep projects viable
-- 🎯 EMPHASIZE lean MVP thinking while preserving long-term vision
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
-- 📚 Review the complete PRD document built so far
-- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating scoping decisions
-- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
-- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step name to the end of the list of stepsCompleted
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Complete PRD document built so far is available for review
-- User journeys, success criteria, and domain requirements are documented
-- Focus on strategic scope decisions, not feature details
-- Balance between user value and implementation feasibility
-## YOUR TASK:
-Conduct comprehensive scoping exercise to define MVP boundaries and prioritize features across development phases.
-## SCOPING SEQUENCE:
-### 1. Review Current PRD State
-Analyze everything documented so far:
-- Present synthesis of established vision, success criteria, journeys
-- Assess domain and innovation focus
-- Evaluate scope implications: simple MVP, medium, or complex project
-- Ask if initial assessment feels right or if they see it differently
-### 2. Define MVP Strategy
-Facilitate strategic MVP decisions:
-- Explore MVP philosophy options: problem-solving, experience, platform, or revenue MVP
-- Ask critical questions:
-  - What's the minimum that would make users say 'this is useful'?
-  - What would make investors/partners say 'this has potential'?
-  - What's the fastest path to validated learning?
-- Guide toward appropriate MVP approach for their product
-### 3. Scoping Decision Framework
-Use structured decision-making for scope:
-**Must-Have Analysis:**
-- Guide identification of absolute MVP necessities
-- For each journey and success criterion, ask:
-  - Without this, does the product fail?
-  - Can this be manual initially?
-  - Is this a deal-breaker for early adopters?
-- Analyze journeys for MVP essentials
-**Nice-to-Have Analysis:**
-- Identify what could be added later:
-  - Features that enhance but aren't essential
-  - User types that can be added later
-  - Advanced functionality that builds on MVP
-- Ask what features could be added in versions 2, 3, etc.
-### 4. Progressive Feature Roadmap
-Create phased development approach:
-- Guide mapping of features across development phases
-- Structure as Phase 1 (MVP), Phase 2 (Growth), Phase 3 (Vision)
-- Ensure clear progression and dependencies
-- Core user value delivery
-- Essential user journeys
-- Basic functionality that works reliably
-**Phase 2: Growth**
-- Additional user types
-- Enhanced features
-- Scale improvements
-**Phase 3: Expansion**
-- Advanced capabilities
-- Platform features
-- New markets or use cases
-**Where does your current vision fit in this development sequence?**"
-### 5. Risk-Based Scoping
-Identify and mitigate scoping risks:
-**Technical Risks:**
-"Looking at your innovation and domain requirements:
-- What's the most technically challenging aspect?
-- Could we simplify the initial implementation?
-- What's the riskiest assumption about technology feasibility?"
-**Market Risks:**
-- What's the biggest market risk?
-- How does the MVP address this?
-- What learning do we need to de-risk this?"
-**Resource Risks:**
-- What if we have fewer resources than planned?
-- What's the absolute minimum team size needed?
-- Can we launch with a smaller feature set?"
-### 6. Generate Scoping Content
-Prepare comprehensive scoping section:
-#### Content Structure:
-```markdown
-## Project Scoping & Phased Development
-### MVP Strategy & Philosophy
-**MVP Approach:** {{chosen_mvp_approach}}
-**Resource Requirements:** {{mvp_team_size_and_skills}}
-### MVP Feature Set (Phase 1)
-**Core User Journeys Supported:**
-{{essential_journeys_for_mvp}}
-**Must-Have Capabilities:**
-{{list_of_essential_mvp_features}}
-### Post-MVP Features
-**Phase 2 (Post-MVP):**
-{{planned_growth_features}}
-**Phase 3 (Expansion):**
-{{planned_expansion_features}}
-### Risk Mitigation Strategy
-**Technical Risks:** {{mitigation_approach}}
-**Market Risks:** {{validation_approach}}
-**Resource Risks:** {{contingency_approach}}
-```
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
-Present the scoping decisions for review, then display menu:
-- Show strategic scoping plan (using structure from step 6)
-- Highlight MVP boundaries and phased roadmap
-- Ask if they'd like to refine further, get other perspectives, or proceed
-- Present menu options naturally as part of conversation
-Display: "**Select:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Functional Requirements (Step 9 of 11)"
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask} with the current scoping analysis, process the enhanced insights that come back, ask user if they accept the improvements, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow} with the scoping context, process the collaborative insights on MVP and roadmap decisions, ask user if they accept the changes, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF C: Append the final content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter by adding this step name to the end of the stepsCompleted array, then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
-When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
-## SUCCESS METRICS:
-✅ Complete PRD document analyzed for scope implications
-✅ Strategic MVP approach defined and justified
-✅ Clear MVP feature boundaries established
-✅ Phased development roadmap created
-✅ Key risks identified and mitigation strategies defined
-✅ User explicitly agrees to scope decisions
-✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
-✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
-## FAILURE MODES:
-❌ Not analyzing the complete PRD before making scoping decisions
-❌ Making scope decisions without strategic rationale
-❌ Not getting explicit user agreement on MVP boundaries
-❌ Missing critical risk analysis
-❌ Not creating clear phased development approach
-❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
-## NEXT STEP:
-After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load {nextStepFile}.
-Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-09 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-09-functional.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,231 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-09-functional'
-description: 'Synthesize all discovery into comprehensive functional requirements'
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-10-nonfunctional.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/prd.md'
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-# Step 9: Functional Requirements Synthesis
-**Progress: Step 9 of 11** - Next: Non-Functional Requirements
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
-- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between PM peers
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- 💬 FOCUS on creating comprehensive capability inventory for the product
-- 🎯 CRITICAL: This is THE CAPABILITY CONTRACT for all downstream work
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
-- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating functional requirements
-- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
-- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step name to the end of the list of stepsCompleted
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
-- ALL previous content (executive summary, success criteria, journeys, domain, innovation, project-type) must be referenced
-- No additional data files needed for this step
-- Focus on capabilities, not implementation details
-## CRITICAL IMPORTANCE:
-**This section defines THE CAPABILITY CONTRACT for the entire product:**
-- UX designers will ONLY design what's listed here
-- Architects will ONLY support what's listed here
-- Epic breakdown will ONLY implement what's listed here
-- If a capability is missing from FRs, it will NOT exist in the final product
-## FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SYNTHESIS SEQUENCE:
-### 1. Understand FR Purpose and Usage
-Start by explaining the critical role of functional requirements:
-**Purpose:**
-FRs define WHAT capabilities the product must have. They are the complete inventory of user-facing and system capabilities that deliver the product vision.
-**Critical Properties:**
-✅ Each FR is a testable capability
-✅ Each FR is implementation-agnostic (could be built many ways)
-✅ Each FR specifies WHO and WHAT, not HOW
-✅ No UI details, no performance numbers, no technology choices
-✅ Comprehensive coverage of capability areas
-**How They Will Be Used:**
-1. UX Designer reads FRs → designs interactions for each capability
-2. Architect reads FRs → designs systems to support each capability
-3. PM reads FRs → creates epics and stories to implement each capability
-### 2. Review Existing Content for Capability Extraction
-Systematically review all previous sections to extract capabilities:
-**Extract From:**
-- Executive Summary → Core product differentiator capabilities
-- Success Criteria → Success-enabling capabilities
-- User Journeys → Journey-revealed capabilities
-- Domain Requirements → Compliance and regulatory capabilities
-- Innovation Patterns → Innovative feature capabilities
-- Project-Type Requirements → Technical capability needs
-### 3. Organize Requirements by Capability Area
-Group FRs by logical capability areas (NOT by technology or layer):
-**Good Grouping Examples:**
-- ✅ "User Management" (not "Authentication System")
-- ✅ "Content Discovery" (not "Search Algorithm")
-- ✅ "Team Collaboration" (not "WebSocket Infrastructure")
-**Target 5-8 Capability Areas** for typical projects.
-### 4. Generate Comprehensive FR List
-Create complete functional requirements using this format:
-**Format:**
-- FR#: [Actor] can [capability] [context/constraint if needed]
-- Number sequentially (FR1, FR2, FR3...)
-- Aim for 20-50 FRs for typical projects
-**Altitude Check:**
-Each FR should answer "WHAT capability exists?" NOT "HOW it's implemented?"
-**Examples:**
-- ✅ "Users can customize appearance settings"
-- ❌ "Users can toggle light/dark theme with 3 font size options stored in LocalStorage"
-### 5. Self-Validation Process
-Before presenting to user, validate the FR list:
-**Completeness Check:**
-1. "Did I cover EVERY capability mentioned in the MVP scope section?"
-2. "Did I include domain-specific requirements as FRs?"
-3. "Did I cover the project-type specific needs?"
-4. "Could a UX designer read ONLY the FRs and know what to design?"
-5. "Could an Architect read ONLY the FRs and know what to support?"
-6. "Are there any user actions or system behaviors we discussed that have no FR?"
-**Altitude Check:**
-1. "Am I stating capabilities (WHAT) or implementation (HOW)?"
-2. "Am I listing acceptance criteria or UI specifics?" (Remove if yes)
-3. "Could this FR be implemented 5 different ways?" (Good - means it's not prescriptive)
-**Quality Check:**
-1. "Is each FR clear enough that someone could test whether it exists?"
-2. "Is each FR independent (not dependent on reading other FRs to understand)?"
-3. "Did I avoid vague terms like 'good', 'fast', 'easy'?" (Use NFRs for quality attributes)
-### 6. Generate Functional Requirements Content
-Prepare the content to append to the document:
-#### Content Structure:
-When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
-```markdown
-## Functional Requirements
-### [Capability Area Name]
-- FR1: [Specific Actor] can [specific capability]
-- FR2: [Specific Actor] can [specific capability]
-- FR3: [Specific Actor] can [specific capability]
-### [Another Capability Area]
-- FR4: [Specific Actor] can [specific capability]
-- FR5: [Specific Actor] can [specific capability]
-[Continue for all capability areas discovered in conversation]
-```
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
-Present the functional requirements for review, then display menu:
-- Show synthesized functional requirements (using structure from step 6)
-- Emphasize this is the capability contract for all downstream work
-- Highlight that every feature must trace back to these requirements
-- Ask if they'd like to refine further, get other perspectives, or proceed
-- Present menu options naturally as part of conversation
-**What would you like to do?**"
-Display: "**Select:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Non-Functional Requirements (Step 10 of 11)"
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask} with the current FR list, process the enhanced capability coverage that comes back, ask user if they accept the additions, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow} with the current FR list, process the collaborative capability validation and additions, ask user if they accept the changes, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF C: Append the final content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter by adding this step name to the end of the stepsCompleted array, then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
-When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
-## SUCCESS METRICS:
-✅ All previous discovery content synthesized into FRs
-✅ FRs organized by capability areas (not technology)
-✅ Each FR states WHAT capability exists, not HOW to implement
-✅ Comprehensive coverage with 20-50 FRs typical
-✅ Altitude validation ensures implementation-agnostic requirements
-✅ Completeness check validates coverage of all discussed capabilities
-✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
-✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
-## FAILURE MODES:
-❌ Missing capabilities from previous discovery sections
-❌ Organizing FRs by technology instead of capability areas
-❌ Including implementation details or UI specifics in FRs
-❌ Not achieving comprehensive coverage of discussed capabilities
-❌ Using vague terms instead of testable capabilities
-❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
-❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
-## CAPABILITY CONTRACT REMINDER:
-Emphasize to user: "This FR list is now binding. Any feature not listed here will not exist in the final product unless we explicitly add it. This is why it's critical to ensure completeness now."
-## NEXT STEP:
-After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load {nextStepFile} to define non-functional requirements.
-Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-10 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!

package/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-10-nonfunctional.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,242 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-10-nonfunctional'
-description: 'Define quality attributes that matter for this specific product'
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-11-polish.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/prd.md'
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-# Step 10: Non-Functional Requirements
-**Progress: Step 10 of 12** - Next: Polish Document
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
-- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between PM peers
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- 💬 FOCUS on quality attributes that matter for THIS specific product
-- 🎯 SELECTIVE: Only document NFRs that actually apply to the product
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
-- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating NFR content
-- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
-- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step name to the end of the list of stepsCompleted
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
-- Functional requirements already defined and will inform NFRs
-- Domain and project-type context will guide which NFRs matter
-- Focus on specific, measurable quality criteria
-## YOUR TASK:
-Define non-functional requirements that specify quality attributes for the product, focusing only on what matters for THIS specific product.
-## NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SEQUENCE:
-### 1. Explain NFR Purpose and Scope
-Start by clarifying what NFRs are and why we're selective:
-**NFR Purpose:**
-NFRs define HOW WELL the system must perform, not WHAT it must do. They specify quality attributes like performance, security, scalability, etc.
-**Selective Approach:**
-We only document NFRs that matter for THIS product. If a category doesn't apply, we skip it entirely. This prevents requirement bloat and focuses on what's actually important.
-### 2. Assess Product Context for NFR Relevance
-Evaluate which NFR categories matter based on product context:
-**Quick Assessment Questions:**
-- **Performance**: Is there user-facing impact of speed?
-- **Security**: Are we handling sensitive data or payments?
-- **Scalability**: Do we expect rapid user growth?
-- **Accessibility**: Are we serving broad public audiences?
-- **Integration**: Do we need to connect with other systems?
-- **Reliability**: Would downtime cause significant problems?
-### 3. Explore Relevant NFR Categories
-For each relevant category, conduct targeted discovery:
-#### Performance NFRs (If relevant):
-Explore performance requirements:
-- What parts of the system need to be fast for users to be successful?
-- Are there specific response time expectations?
-- What happens if performance is slower than expected?
-- Are there concurrent user scenarios we need to support?
-#### Security NFRs (If relevant):
-Explore security requirements:
-- What data needs to be protected?
-- Who should have access to what?
-- What are the security risks we need to mitigate?
-- Are there compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS)?
-#### Scalability NFRs (If relevant):
-Explore scalability requirements:
-- How many users do we expect initially? Long-term?
-- Are there seasonal or event-based traffic spikes?
-- What happens if we exceed our capacity?
-- What growth scenarios should we plan for?
-#### Accessibility NFRs (If relevant):
-Explore accessibility requirements:
-- Are we serving users with visual, hearing, or motor impairments?
-- Are there legal accessibility requirements (WCAG, Section 508)?
-- What accessibility features are most important for our users?
-#### Integration NFRs (If relevant):
-Explore integration requirements:
-- What external systems do we need to connect with?
-- Are there APIs or data formats we must support?
-- How reliable do these integrations need to be?
-### 4. Make NFRs Specific and Measurable
-For each relevant NFR category, ensure criteria are testable:
-**From Vague to Specific:**
-- NOT: "The system should be fast" → "User actions complete within 2 seconds"
-- NOT: "The system should be secure" → "All data is encrypted at rest and in transit"
-- NOT: "The system should scale" → "System supports 10x user growth with <10% performance degradation"
-### 5. Generate NFR Content (Only Relevant Categories)
-Prepare the content to append to the document:
-#### Content Structure (Dynamic based on relevance):
-When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections (only include sections that are relevant):
-```markdown
-## Non-Functional Requirements
-### Performance
-[Performance requirements based on conversation - only include if relevant]
-### Security
-[Security requirements based on conversation - only include if relevant]
-### Scalability
-[Scalability requirements based on conversation - only include if relevant]
-### Accessibility
-[Accessibility requirements based on conversation - only include if relevant]
-### Integration
-[Integration requirements based on conversation - only include if relevant]
-```
-### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
-Present the non-functional requirements for review, then display menu:
-- Show defined NFRs (using structure from step 5)
-- Note that only relevant categories were included
-- Emphasize NFRs specify how well the system needs to perform
-- Ask if they'd like to refine further, get other perspectives, or proceed
-- Present menu options naturally as part of conversation
-Display: "**Select:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Polish Document (Step 11 of 12)"
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask} with the current NFR content, process the enhanced quality attribute insights that come back, ask user if they accept the improvements, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow} with the current NFR list, process the collaborative technical validation and additions, ask user if they accept the changes, if yes update content then redisplay menu, if no keep original content then redisplay menu
-- IF C: Append the final content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter by adding this step name to the end of the stepsCompleted array, then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
-When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 5.
-## SUCCESS METRICS:
-✅ Only relevant NFR categories documented (no requirement bloat)
-✅ Each NFR is specific and measurable
-✅ NFRs connected to actual user needs and business context
-✅ Vague requirements converted to testable criteria
-✅ Domain-specific compliance requirements included if relevant
-✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
-✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
-## FAILURE MODES:
-❌ Documenting NFR categories that don't apply to the product
-❌ Leaving requirements vague and unmeasurable
-❌ Not connecting NFRs to actual user or business needs
-❌ Missing domain-specific compliance requirements
-❌ Creating overly prescriptive technical requirements
-❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
-❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
-❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
-## NFR CATEGORY GUIDANCE:
-**Include Performance When:**
-- User-facing response times impact success
-- Real-time interactions are critical
-- Performance is a competitive differentiator
-**Include Security When:**
-- Handling sensitive user data
-- Processing payments or financial information
-- Subject to compliance regulations
-- Protecting intellectual property
-**Include Scalability When:**
-- Expecting rapid user growth
-- Handling variable traffic patterns
-- Supporting enterprise-scale usage
-- Planning for market expansion
-**Include Accessibility When:**
-- Serving broad public audiences
-- Subject to accessibility regulations
-- Targeting users with disabilities
-- B2B customers with accessibility requirements
-## NEXT STEP:
-After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load {nextStepFile} to finalize the PRD and complete the workflow.
-Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-11 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!