claudecode-omc 5.9.1 → 5.12.0

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/copilot-tools.md

@@ -1,31 +1,38 @@
 # Copilot CLI Tool Mapping
 
-Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
-
-| Skill references | Copilot CLI equivalent |
-|-----------------|----------------------|
-| `Read` (file reading) | `view` |
-| `Write` (file creation) | `create` |
-| `Edit` (file editing) | `edit` |
-| `Bash` (run commands) | `bash` |
-| `Grep` (search file content) | `grep` |
-| `Glob` (search files by name) | `glob` |
-| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | `skill` |
-| `WebFetch` | `web_fetch` |
-| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | `task` with `agent_type: "general-purpose"` or `"explore"` |
-| Multiple `Task` calls (parallel) | Multiple `task` calls |
-| Task status/output | `read_agent`, `list_agents` |
-| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `sql` with built-in `todos` table |
-| `WebSearch` | No equivalent — use `web_fetch` with a search engine URL |
-| `EnterPlanMode` / `ExitPlanMode` | No equivalent — stay in the main session |
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Copilot CLI these resolve to the tools below.
+
+| Action skills request | Copilot CLI equivalent |
+|----------------------|----------------------|
+| Read a file | `view` |
+| Create / edit / delete a file | `apply_patch` (Copilot CLI has no separate create/edit/write tools) |
+| Run a shell command | `bash` |
+| Search file contents | `rg` (ripgrep; Copilot CLI does not expose a `grep` tool) |
+| Find files by name | `glob` |
+| Fetch a URL | `web_fetch` |
+| Search the web | `web_search` |
+| Invoke a skill | `skill` |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `task` with `agent_type: "general-purpose"` (other accepted types: `explore`, `task`, `code-review`, `research`, `configure-copilot`) |
+| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `task` calls in one response |
+| Subagent status/output/control | `read_agent`, `list_agents`, `write_agent` |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `update_todo` |
+| Enter / exit plan mode | No equivalent — stay in the main session |
+
+## Instructions file
+
+When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Copilot CLI this is **`AGENTS.md`** at the repository root. If both `AGENTS.md` and `.github/copilot-instructions.md` are present, Copilot reads both.
+
+## Personal skills directory
+
+User-level skills live at **`~/.copilot/skills/`**. Copilot CLI also recognizes the cross-runtime alias **`~/.agents/skills/`**, which is shared with Codex and Gemini CLI. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
 
 ## Async shell sessions
 
-Copilot CLI supports persistent async shell sessions, which have no direct Claude Code equivalent:
+Copilot CLI supports persistent async shell sessions:
 
 | Tool | Purpose |
 |------|---------|
-| `bash` with `async: true` | Start a long-running command in the background |
+| `bash` with `mode: "async"` (and optionally `detach: true`) | Start a long-running command in the background; returns a `shellId` |
 | `write_bash` | Send input to a running async session |
 | `read_bash` | Read output from an async session |
 | `stop_bash` | Terminate an async session |

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md

@@ -1,51 +1,63 @@
 # Gemini CLI Tool Mapping
 
-Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
-
-| Skill references | Gemini CLI equivalent |
-|-----------------|----------------------|
-| `Read` (file reading) | `read_file` |
-| `Write` (file creation) | `write_file` |
-| `Edit` (file editing) | `replace` |
-| `Bash` (run commands) | `run_shell_command` |
-| `Grep` (search file content) | `grep_search` |
-| `Glob` (search files by name) | `glob` |
-| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `write_todos` |
-| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | `activate_skill` |
-| `WebSearch` | `google_web_search` |
-| `WebFetch` | `web_fetch` |
-| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | `@agent-name` (see [Subagent support](#subagent-support)) |
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Gemini CLI these resolve to the tools below.
+
+| Action skills request | Gemini CLI equivalent |
+|----------------------|----------------------|
+| Read a file | `read_file` |
+| Read multiple files at once | `read_many_files` |
+| Create a new file | `write_file` |
+| Edit a file | `replace` |
+| Run a shell command | `run_shell_command` |
+| Search file contents | `grep_search` |
+| Find files by name | `glob` |
+| List files and subdirectories | `list_directory` |
+| Fetch a URL | `web_fetch` |
+| Search the web | `google_web_search` |
+| Invoke a skill | `activate_skill` |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` (invocable via `@generalist` chat syntax — see [Subagent support](#subagent-support)) |
+| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `invoke_agent` calls in the same response |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `write_todos` (statuses: pending, in_progress, completed, cancelled, blocked) |
+
+## Instructions file
+
+When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Gemini CLI this is **`GEMINI.md`**. Gemini CLI loads `GEMINI.md` hierarchically: global at `~/.gemini/GEMINI.md`, project-level files in workspace directories and their ancestors, and sub-directory `GEMINI.md` files when a tool accesses files in those directories.
+
+## Personal skills directory
+
+User-level skills live at **`~/.gemini/skills/`**, with **`~/.agents/skills/`** as a cross-runtime alias (shared with Codex and Copilot CLI). When both directories exist at the same scope, `.agents/skills/` takes precedence. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
 
 ## Subagent support
 
-Gemini CLI supports subagents natively via the `@` syntax. Use the built-in `@generalist` agent to dispatch any task — it has access to all tools and follows the prompt you provide.
+Gemini CLI dispatches subagents through the `invoke_agent` tool, which takes `agent_name` and `prompt` parameters. The same dispatch is also surfaced as a chat-syntax shortcut: typing `@generalist <prompt>` is equivalent to calling `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"`. Built-in agent names include `generalist`, `cli_help`, `codebase_investigator`, and (with browser tooling enabled) `browser_agent`.
 
-When a skill says to dispatch a named agent type, use `@generalist` with the full prompt from the skill's prompt template:
+Skills dispatch with `Subagent (general-purpose):` and either reference a prompt-template file (e.g., `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`'s `./implementer-prompt.md`) or supply an inline prompt. On Gemini CLI:
 
-| Skill instruction | Gemini CLI equivalent |
-|-------------------|----------------------|
-| `Task tool (superpowers:implementer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `implementer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:spec-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `spec-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer)` | `@code-reviewer` (bundled agent) or `@generalist` with the filled review prompt |
-| `Task tool (superpowers:code-quality-reviewer)` | `@generalist` with the filled `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` template |
-| `Task tool (general-purpose)` with inline prompt | `@generalist` with your inline prompt |
+| Skill dispatch form | Gemini CLI equivalent |
+|---------------------|----------------------|
+| References a `*-prompt.md` template (implementer, task-reviewer, code-reviewer, etc.) | Fill the template, then `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and the filled prompt |
+| References `superpowers:requesting-code-review`'s `./code-reviewer.md` | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and the filled review template |
+| Inline prompt (no template referenced) | `invoke_agent` with `agent_name: "generalist"` and your inline prompt |
 
 ### Prompt filling
 
-Skills provide prompt templates with placeholders like `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` or `[FULL TEXT of task]`. Fill all placeholders and pass the complete prompt as the message to `@generalist`. The prompt template itself contains the agent's role, review criteria, and expected output format — `@generalist` will follow it.
+Skills provide prompt templates with placeholders like `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` or `[FULL TEXT of task]`. Fill all placeholders before passing the complete prompt to `invoke_agent`. The prompt template itself contains the agent's role, review criteria, and expected output format — the subagent will follow it.
 
 ### Parallel dispatch
 
-Gemini CLI supports parallel subagent dispatch. When a skill asks you to dispatch multiple independent subagent tasks in parallel, request all of those `@generalist` or named subagent tasks together in the same prompt. Keep dependent tasks sequential, but do not serialize independent subagent tasks just to preserve a simpler history.
+Gemini CLI supports parallel subagent dispatch. Issue multiple `invoke_agent` calls in the same response (or multiple `@generalist` invocations in one prompt) to run independent subagent work in parallel. Keep dependent tasks sequential, but do not serialize independent subagent tasks just to preserve a simpler history.
 
 ## Additional Gemini CLI tools
 
-These tools are available in Gemini CLI but have no Claude Code equivalent:
+These tools are unique to Gemini CLI:
 
 | Tool | Purpose |
 |------|---------|
-| `list_directory` | List files and subdirectories |
-| `save_memory` | Persist facts to GEMINI.md across sessions |
-| `ask_user` | Request structured input from the user |
-| `tracker_create_task` | Rich task management (create, update, list, visualize) |
-| `enter_plan_mode` / `exit_plan_mode` | Switch to read-only research mode before making changes |
+| `save_memory` (legacy) | Persist facts across sessions when `experimental.memoryV2 = false` |
+| `get_internal_docs` | Look up Gemini CLI's bundled documentation |
+| `ask_user` | Pose structured questions to the user (text / single-select / multi-select) |
+| `enter_plan_mode` / `exit_plan_mode` | Switch into and out of read-only plan mode |
+| `update_topic` | Update the current conversation's topic / strategic-intent metadata |
+| `complete_task` | Signal that a Gemini subagent has completed and return its result to the parent agent |
+| `tracker_create_task`, `tracker_update_task`, `tracker_get_task`, `tracker_list_tasks`, `tracker_add_dependency`, `tracker_visualize` | Rich task tracker with dependency and visualization support |
+| `read_mcp_resource`, `list_mcp_resources` | MCP resource access |

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Pi Tool Mapping
+
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Pi these resolve to the tools below.
+
+| Action skills request | Pi equivalent |
+| --- | --- |
+| Invoke a skill | Pi native skills: load the relevant `SKILL.md` with `read`, or let the human use `/skill:name` |
+| Read a file | `read` |
+| Create a file | `write` |
+| Edit a file | `edit` |
+| Run a shell command | `bash` |
+| Search file contents | `grep` when active; otherwise `bash` with `rg`/`grep` |
+| Find files by name | `find` or `bash` with shell globs |
+| List files and subdirectories | `ls` when active; otherwise `bash` with `ls` |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | Use an installed subagent tool such as `subagent` from `pi-subagents` if available |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | Use an installed todo/task tool if available, otherwise track tasks in the plan or `TODO.md` |
+
+## Skills
+
+Pi discovers skills from configured skill directories and installed Pi packages. A Superpowers Pi package should expose `skills/` through its `pi.skills` manifest entry. Pi does not expose Claude Code's `Skill` tool, but the agent should still follow the Superpowers rule: when a skill applies, load and follow it before responding.
+
+## Subagents
+
+Pi core does not ship a standard subagent tool. The `pi-subagents` package is a strong optional companion and provides a `subagent` tool with single-agent, chain, parallel, async, forked-context, and resume/status workflows. If no subagent tool is available, do not fabricate `Task` calls; execute sequentially in the current session or explain that the optional subagent capability is not installed.
+
+## Task lists
+
+Pi core does not ship a standard task-list tool. If a todo/task extension is installed, use its documented tool. Otherwise use Superpowers plan files, checklists in Markdown, or a repo-local `TODO.md` for task tracking. Older Superpowers docs may refer to `TodoWrite`; treat that as the task-tracking action above.

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md

@@ -33,6 +33,15 @@ Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what
 
 This structure informs the task decomposition. Each task should produce self-contained changes that make sense independently.
 
+## Task Right-Sizing
+
+A task is the smallest unit that carries its own test cycle and is worth a
+fresh reviewer's gate. When drawing task boundaries: fold setup,
+configuration, scaffolding, and documentation steps into the task whose
+deliverable needs them; split only where a reviewer could meaningfully
+reject one task while approving its neighbor. Each task ends with an
+independently testable deliverable.
+
 ## Bite-Sized Task Granularity
 
 **Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**
@@ -57,6 +66,13 @@ This structure informs the task decomposition. Each task should produce self-con
 
 **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
 
+## Global Constraints
+
+[The spec's project-wide requirements — version floors, dependency limits,
+naming and copy rules, platform requirements — one line each, with exact
+values copied verbatim from the spec. Every task's requirements implicitly
+include this section.]
+
 ---
 ```
 
@@ -70,6 +86,12 @@ This structure informs the task decomposition. Each task should produce self-con
 - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
 - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
 
+**Interfaces:**
+- Consumes: [what this task uses from earlier tasks — exact signatures]
+- Produces: [what later tasks rely on — exact function names, parameter
+  and return types. A task's implementer sees only their own task; this
+  block is how they learn the names and types neighboring tasks use.]
+
 - [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing test**
 
 ```python

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/writing-plans/plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Use this template when dispatching a plan document reviewer subagent.
 **Dispatch after:** The complete plan is written.
 
 ```
-Task tool (general-purpose):
+Subagent (general-purpose):
   description: "Review plan document"
   prompt: |
     You are a plan document reviewer. Verify this plan is complete and ready for implementation.

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying
 
 **Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.**
 
-**Personal skills live in agent-specific directories (`~/.claude/skills` for Claude Code, `~/.agents/skills/` for Codex)** 
+**Personal skills live in your runtime's skills directory** — see [claude-code-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/copilot-tools.md), or [gemini-tools.md](../using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md) for the path on your runtime. Codex, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI all also recognize `~/.agents/skills/` as a cross-runtime alias.
 
 You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill (documentation), watch tests pass (agents comply), and refactor (close loopholes).
 
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (basel
 
 ## What is a Skill?
 
-A **skill** is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future Claude instances find and apply effective approaches.
+A **skill** is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future agents find and apply effective approaches.
 
 **Skills are:** Reusable techniques, patterns, tools, reference guides
 
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ The entire skill creation process follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
 **Don't create for:**
 - One-off solutions
 - Standard practices well-documented elsewhere
-- Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)
+- Project-specific conventions (put in your instructions file)
 - Mechanical constraints (if it's enforceable with regex/validation, automate it—save documentation for judgment calls)
 
 ## Skill Types
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ skills/
 - `description`: Third-person, describes ONLY when to use (NOT what it does)
   - Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
   - Include specific symptoms, situations, and contexts
-  - **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see CSO section for why)
+  - **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see SDO section for why)
   - Keep under 500 characters if possible
 
 ```markdown
@@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ Concrete results
 ```
 
 
-## Claude Search Optimization (CSO)
+## Skill Discovery Optimization (SDO)
 
-**Critical for discovery:** Future Claude needs to FIND your skill
+**Critical for discovery:** Future agents need to FIND your skill
 
 ### 1. Rich Description Field
 
-**Purpose:** Claude reads description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"
+**Purpose:** Your agent reads the description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"
 
 **Format:** Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
 
@@ -151,14 +151,14 @@ Concrete results
 
 The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions. Do NOT summarize the skill's process or workflow in the description.
 
-**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, Claude may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused Claude to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).
+**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, an agent may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused an agent to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).
 
-When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), Claude correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.
+When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), the agent correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.
 
-**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut Claude will take. The skill body becomes documentation Claude skips.
+**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workflow create a shortcut agents will take. The skill body becomes documentation agents skip.
 
 ```yaml
-# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow - Claude may follow this instead of reading skill
+# ❌ BAD: Summarizes workflow - agents may follow this instead of reading skill
 description: Use when executing plans - dispatches subagent per task with code review between tasks
 
 # ❌ BAD: Too much process detail
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ description: Use when using React Router and handling authentication redirects
 
 ### 2. Keyword Coverage
 
-Use words Claude would search for:
+Use words an agent would search for:
 - Error messages: "Hook timed out", "ENOTEMPTY", "race condition"
 - Symptoms: "flaky", "hanging", "zombie", "pollution"
 - Synonyms: "timeout/hang/freeze", "cleanup/teardown/afterEach"
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ wc -w skills/path/SKILL.md
 - `creating-skills`, `testing-skills`, `debugging-with-logs`
 - Active, describes the action you're taking
 
-### 4. Cross-Referencing Other Skills
+### 5. Cross-Referencing Other Skills
 
 **When writing documentation that references other skills:**
 
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ digraph when_flowchart {
 - Linear instructions → Numbered lists
 - Labels without semantic meaning (step1, helper2)
 
-See @graphviz-conventions.dot for graphviz style rules.
+See `graphviz-conventions.dot` in this directory for graphviz style rules.
 
 **Visualizing for your human partner:** Use `render-graphs.js` in this directory to render a skill's flowcharts to SVG:
 ```bash
@@ -456,10 +456,29 @@ Different skill types need different test approaches:
 
 **All of these mean: Test before deploying. No exceptions.**
 
+## Match the Form to the Failure
+
+Before writing guidance, classify the baseline failure. The form that bulletproofs one failure type measurably backfires on another.
+
+| Baseline failure | Right form | Wrong form |
+|---|---|---|
+| Skips/violates a rule under pressure (knows better, does it anyway) | Prohibition + rationalization table + red flags (see Bulletproofing below) | Soft guidance ("prefer...", "consider...") |
+| Complies, but output has the wrong shape (bloated prompt, buried verdict, restated spec) | Positive recipe or contract: state what the output IS — its parts, in order | Prohibition list ("don't restate", "never narrate") |
+| Omits a required element from something they already produce | Structural: REQUIRED field or slot in the template they fill in | Prose reminders near the template |
+| Behavior should depend on a condition | Conditional keyed to an observable predicate ("if the brief exists, reference it") | Unconditional rule + exemption clauses |
+
+**Why prohibitions backfire on shaping problems:** under a competing incentive ("make the prompt self-contained"), agents negotiate with "don't X". In head-to-head wording tests on dispatch-prompt guidance, the prohibition arm produced clearly more of the unwanted content than the recipe arm (fully separated distributions), and trended worse than even the no-guidance control — micro-test your own case rather than assuming, but never reach for the prohibition by default. A recipe leaves nothing to negotiate: the output matches the stated shape or it doesn't.
+
+**Rules for whichever form you pick:**
+- **No nuance clauses.** "Don't X unless it matters" reopens the negotiation — appending a single nuance clause to a winning recipe degraded it from consistent to noisy in the same wording tests. Express a real exception as its own conditional on an observable predicate.
+- **Exemption clauses don't scope.** "This limit doesn't apply to code blocks" still suppresses code blocks. If part of the output must be exempt, restructure so the rule can't reach it.
+
 ## Bulletproofing Skills Against Rationalization
 
 Skills that enforce discipline (like TDD) need to resist rationalization. Agents are smart and will find loopholes when under pressure.
 
+**Scope:** this toolkit is for discipline failures — an agent that knows the rule and skips it under pressure. For wrong-shaped output or omitted elements, prohibition-based bulletproofing backfires; use the forms in Match the Form to the Failure instead.
+
 **Psychology note:** Understanding WHY persuasion techniques work helps you apply them systematically. See persuasion-principles.md for research foundation (Cialdini, 2021; Meincke et al., 2025) on authority, commitment, scarcity, social proof, and unity principles.
 
 ### Close Every Loophole Explicitly
@@ -522,7 +541,7 @@ Make it easy for agents to self-check when rationalizing:
 **All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.**
 ```
 
-### Update CSO for Violation Symptoms
+### Update SDO for Violation Symptoms
 
 Add to description: symptoms of when you're ABOUT to violate the rule:
 
@@ -553,7 +572,19 @@ Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
 
 Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter. Re-test until bulletproof.
 
-**Testing methodology:** See @testing-skills-with-subagents.md for the complete testing methodology:
+### Micro-Test Wording Before Full Scenarios
+
+Full pressure-scenario runs are the final gate, but they are slow and expensive per iteration. Verify the wording itself first with micro-tests:
+
+1. **One fresh-context sample per call** — a raw API call, or a single-shot subagent if you don't have API access. System prompt = the realistic context the guidance will live in (the full skill or prompt template, not the guidance in isolation); user message = a task that tempts the failure.
+2. **Always include a no-guidance control.** If the control doesn't exhibit the failure, there is nothing to fix — stop, don't author the guidance.
+3. **5+ reps per variant.** Single samples lie.
+4. **Manually read every flagged match.** Score programmatically if you like, but template echoes and quoted counter-examples masquerade as hits; automated counts alone overstate both failure and success.
+5. **Variance is a metric.** When guidance lands, reps converge on the same shape. Five different interpretations across five reps means the wording isn't binding — tighten the form before adding words.
+
+Micro-tests verify wording; they do not replace pressure scenarios for discipline skills.
+
+**Testing methodology:** See [testing-skills-with-subagents.md](testing-skills-with-subagents.md) for the complete testing methodology:
 - How to write pressure scenarios
 - Pressure types (time, sunk cost, authority, exhaustion)
 - Plugging holes systematically
@@ -595,7 +626,7 @@ Deploying untested skills = deploying untested code. It's a violation of quality
 
 ## Skill Creation Checklist (TDD Adapted)
 
-**IMPORTANT: Use TodoWrite to create todos for EACH checklist item below.**
+**IMPORTANT: Create a todo for EACH checklist item below.**
 
 **RED Phase - Write Failing Test:**
 - [ ] Create pressure scenarios (3+ combined pressures for discipline skills)
@@ -610,6 +641,8 @@ Deploying untested skills = deploying untested code. It's a violation of quality
 - [ ] Keywords throughout for search (errors, symptoms, tools)
 - [ ] Clear overview with core principle
 - [ ] Address specific baseline failures identified in RED
+- [ ] Guidance form matches the failure type (see Match the Form to the Failure)
+- [ ] For behavior-shaping guidance: wording micro-tested against a no-guidance control (5+ reps, every flagged match read manually) — N/A for pure reference skills
 - [ ] Code inline OR link to separate file
 - [ ] One excellent example (not multi-language)
 - [ ] Run scenarios WITH skill - verify agents now comply
@@ -634,9 +667,10 @@ Deploying untested skills = deploying untested code. It's a violation of quality
 
 ## Discovery Workflow
 
-How future Claude finds your skill:
+How future agents find your skill:
 
 1. **Encounters problem** ("tests are flaky")
+2. **Searches skills** (greps descriptions, browses categories)
 3. **Finds SKILL** (description matches)
 4. **Scans overview** (is this relevant?)
 5. **Reads patterns** (quick reference table)