claudecode-omc 5.9.1 → 5.12.0

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+# Task Reviewer Prompt Template
+
+Use this template when dispatching a task reviewer subagent. The reviewer
+reads the task's diff once and returns two verdicts: spec compliance and
+code quality.
+
+**Purpose:** Verify one task's implementation matches its requirements (nothing
+more, nothing less) and is well-built (clean, tested, maintainable)
+
+```
+Subagent (general-purpose):
+  description: "Review Task N (spec + quality)"
+  model: [MODEL — REQUIRED: choose per SKILL.md Model Selection; an omitted
+         model silently inherits the session's most expensive one]
+  prompt: |
+    You are reviewing one task's implementation: first whether it matches its
+    requirements, then whether it is well-built. This is a task-scoped gate,
+    not a merge review — a broad whole-branch review happens separately after
+    all tasks are complete.
+
+    ## What Was Requested
+
+    Read the task brief: [BRIEF_FILE]
+
+    Global constraints from the spec/design that bind this task:
+    [GLOBAL_CONSTRAINTS]
+
+    ## What the Implementer Claims They Built
+
+    Read the implementer's report: [REPORT_FILE]
+
+    ## Diff Under Review
+
+    **Base:** [BASE_SHA]
+    **Head:** [HEAD_SHA]
+    **Diff file:** [DIFF_FILE]
+
+    Read the diff file once — it contains the commit list, a stat summary,
+    and the full diff with surrounding context, and it is your view of the
+    change. The diff's context lines ARE the changed files: do not Read a
+    changed file separately unless a hunk you must judge is cut off
+    mid-function — and say so in your report. Do not re-run git commands.
+    If the diff file is missing, fetch the diff yourself:
+    `git diff --stat [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]` and `git diff [BASE_SHA]..[HEAD_SHA]`.
+    Do not crawl the broader codebase. Inspect code outside the diff only
+    to evaluate a concrete risk you can name — one focused check per named
+    risk, and name both the risk and what you checked in your report.
+    Cross-cutting changes are legitimate named risks: if the diff changes
+    lock ordering, a function or API contract, or shared mutable state,
+    checking the call sites is the right method.
+
+    Your review is read-only on this checkout. Do not mutate the working
+    tree, the index, HEAD, or branch state in any way.
+
+    ## Do Not Trust the Report
+
+    Treat the implementer's report as unverified claims about the code. It
+    may be incomplete, inaccurate, or optimistic. Verify the claims against
+    the diff. Design rationales in the report are claims too: "left it per
+    YAGNI," "kept it simple deliberately," or any other justification is the
+    implementer grading their own work. Judge the code on its merits — a
+    stated rationale never downgrades a finding's severity.
+
+    ## Tests
+
+    The implementer already ran the tests and reported results with TDD
+    evidence for exactly this code. Do not re-run the suite to confirm their
+    report. Run a test only when reading the code raises a specific doubt
+    that no existing run answers — and then a focused test, never a
+    package-wide suite, race detector run, or repeated/high-count loop. If
+    heavy validation seems warranted, recommend it in your report instead of
+    running it. If you cannot run commands in this environment, name the
+    test you would run.
+
+    Warnings or other noise in the implementer's reported test output are
+    findings — test output should be pristine.
+
+    ## Part 1: Spec Compliance
+
+    Compare the diff against What Was Requested:
+
+    - **Missing:** requirements they skipped, missed, or claimed without
+      implementing
+    - **Extra:** features that weren't requested, over-engineering, unneeded
+      "nice to haves"
+    - **Misunderstood:** right feature built the wrong way, wrong problem
+      solved
+
+    If a requirement cannot be verified from this diff alone (it lives in
+    unchanged code or spans tasks), report it as a ⚠️ item instead of
+    broadening your search.
+
+    ## Part 2: Code Quality
+
+    **Code quality:**
+    - Clean separation of concerns?
+    - Proper error handling?
+    - DRY without premature abstraction?
+    - Edge cases handled?
+
+    **Tests:**
+    - Do the new and changed tests verify real behavior, not mocks?
+    - Are the task's edge cases covered?
+
+    **Structure:**
+    - Does each file have one clear responsibility with a well-defined interface?
+    - Are units decomposed so they can be understood and tested independently?
+    - Is the implementation following the file structure from the plan?
+    - Did this change create new files that are already large, or
+      significantly grow existing files? (Don't flag pre-existing file
+      sizes — focus on what this change contributed.)
+
+    Your report should point at evidence: file:line references for every
+    finding and for any check you would otherwise answer with a bare
+    "yes." A tight report that cites lines gives the controller everything
+    it needs.
+
+    Your final message is the report itself: begin directly with the
+    spec-compliance verdict. Every line is a verdict, a finding with
+    file:line, or a check you ran — no preamble, no process narration,
+    no closing summary.
+
+    ## Calibration
+
+    Categorize issues by actual severity. Not everything is Critical.
+    Important means this task cannot be trusted until it is fixed: incorrect
+    or fragile behavior, a missed requirement, or maintainability damage you
+    would block a merge over — verbatim duplication of a logic block,
+    swallowed errors, tests that assert nothing. "Coverage could be broader"
+    and polish suggestions are Minor.
+    If the plan or brief explicitly mandates something this rubric calls a
+    defect (a test that asserts nothing, verbatim duplication of a logic
+    block), that IS a finding — report it as Important, labeled
+    plan-mandated. The plan's authorship does not grade its own work; the
+    human decides.
+    Acknowledge what was done well before listing issues — accurate praise
+    helps the implementer trust the rest of the feedback.
+
+    ## Output Format
+
+    ### Spec Compliance
+
+    - ✅ Spec compliant | ❌ Issues found: [what's missing/extra/misunderstood,
+      with file:line references]
+    - ⚠️ Cannot verify from diff: [requirements you could not verify from the
+      diff alone, and what the controller should check — report alongside the
+      ✅/❌ verdict for everything you could verify]
+
+    ### Strengths
+    [What's well done? Be specific.]
+
+    ### Issues
+
+    #### Critical (Must Fix)
+    #### Important (Should Fix)
+    #### Minor (Nice to Have)
+
+    For each issue: file:line, what's wrong, why it matters, how to fix
+    (if not obvious).
+
+    ### Assessment
+
+    **Task quality:** [Approved | Needs fixes]
+
+    **Reasoning:** [1-2 sentence technical assessment]
+```
+
+**Placeholders:**
+- `[MODEL]` — REQUIRED: reviewer model per SKILL.md Model Selection
+- `[BRIEF_FILE]` — REQUIRED: the task brief file (`scripts/task-brief PLAN N`
+  prints the path; same file the implementer worked from)
+- `[GLOBAL_CONSTRAINTS]` — the binding requirements copied verbatim from
+  the plan's Global Constraints section or the spec: exact values, formats,
+  and stated relationships between components (not process rules — those
+  are already in this template)
+- `[REPORT_FILE]` — REQUIRED: the file the implementer wrote its detailed
+  report to
+- `[BASE_SHA]` — commit before this task
+- `[HEAD_SHA]` — current commit
+- `[DIFF_FILE]` — REQUIRED: the path the controller wrote the review
+  package to (`scripts/review-package BASE HEAD` prints the unique path it
+  wrote; the package never enters the controller's context)
+
+**Reviewer returns:** Spec Compliance verdict (✅/❌/⚠️), Strengths, Issues
+(Critical/Important/Minor), Task quality verdict
+
+A fix dispatch can address spec gaps and quality findings together;
+re-review after fixes covers both verdicts.

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ If you catch yourself thinking:
 - "Is that not happening?" - You assumed without verifying
 - "Will it show us...?" - You should have added evidence gathering
 - "Stop guessing" - You're proposing fixes without understanding
-- "Ultrathink this" - Question fundamentals, not just symptoms
+- "Ultra-think this" - Question fundamentals, not just symptoms
 - "We're stuck?" (frustrated) - Your approach isn't working
 
 **When you see these:** STOP. Return to Phase 1.

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md

@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ Never fix bugs without a test.
 
 ## Testing Anti-Patterns
 
-When adding mocks or test utilities, read @testing-anti-patterns.md to avoid common pitfalls:
+When adding mocks or test utilities, read [testing-anti-patterns.md](testing-anti-patterns.md) to avoid common pitfalls:
 - Testing mock behavior instead of real behavior
 - Adding test-only methods to production classes
 - Mocking without understanding dependencies

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
 git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null
 ```
 
-**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 3 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
+**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
 
 Report with branch state:
 - On a branch: "Already in isolated workspace at `<path>` on branch `<name>`."
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? I
 
 > "Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."
 
-Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 3.
+Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.
 
 ## Step 1: Create Isolated Workspace
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines cons
 
 ### 1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred)
 
-The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 3.
+The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.
 
 Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using `git worktree add` when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.
 
@@ -73,14 +73,7 @@ Follow this priority order. Explicit user preference always beats observed files
    ```
    If found, use it. If both exist, `.worktrees` wins.
 
-3. **Check for an existing global directory:**
-   ```bash
-   project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
-   ls -d ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project 2>/dev/null
-   ```
-   If found, use it (backward compatibility with legacy global path).
-
-4. **If there is no other guidance available**, default to `.worktrees/` at the project root.
+3. **If there is no other guidance available**, default to `.worktrees/` at the project root.
 
 #### Safety Verification (project-local directories only)
 
@@ -94,16 +87,11 @@ git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/d
 
 **Why critical:** Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.
 
-Global directories (`~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/`) need no verification.
-
 #### Create the Worktree
 
 ```bash
-project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
-
 # Determine path based on chosen location
-# For project-local: path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
-# For global: path="~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/$project/$BRANCH_NAME"
+path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
 
 git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
 cd "$path"
@@ -111,7 +99,7 @@ cd "$path"
 
 **Sandbox fallback:** If `git worktree add` fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.
 
-## Step 3: Project Setup
+## Step 2: Project Setup
 
 Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:
 
@@ -130,7 +118,7 @@ if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi
 if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi
 ```
 
-## Step 4: Verify Clean Baseline
+## Step 3: Verify Clean Baseline
 
 Run tests to ensure workspace starts clean:
 
@@ -163,7 +151,6 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
 | `worktrees/` exists | Use it (verify ignored) |
 | Both exist | Use `.worktrees/` |
 | Neither exists | Check instruction file, then default `.worktrees/` |
-| Global path exists | Use it (backward compat) |
 | Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
 | Permission error on create | Sandbox fallback, work in place |
 | Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
@@ -189,7 +176,7 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
 ### Assuming directory location
 
 - **Problem:** Creates inconsistency, violates project conventions
-- **Fix:** Follow priority: existing > global legacy > instruction file > default
+- **Fix:** Follow priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default
 
 ### Proceeding with failing tests
 
@@ -209,7 +196,7 @@ Ready to implement <feature-name>
 **Always:**
 - Run Step 0 detection first
 - Prefer native tools over git fallback
-- Follow directory priority: existing > global legacy > instruction file > default
+- Follow directory priority: explicit instructions > existing project-local directory > default
 - Verify directory is ignored for project-local
 - Auto-detect and run project setup
 - Verify clean test baseline

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: using-superpowers
-description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
+description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
 ---
 
 <SUBAGENT-STOP>
@@ -27,9 +27,13 @@ If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "alw
 
 ## How to Access Skills
 
-**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
+**Never read skill files manually with file tools** — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism so the skill is properly activated.
 
-**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The `skill` tool works the same as Claude Code's `Skill` tool.
+**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly.
+
+**In Codex:** Skills load natively. Follow the instructions presented when a skill activates.
+
+**In Copilot CLI:** Use the `skill` tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
 
 **In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
 
@@ -37,7 +41,7 @@ If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "alw
 
 ## Platform Adaptation
 
-Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-tools.md` (Copilot CLI), `references/codex-tools.md` (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file") rather than naming any one runtime's tools. For per-platform tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, see [claude-code-tools.md](references/claude-code-tools.md), [codex-tools.md](references/codex-tools.md), [copilot-tools.md](references/copilot-tools.md), [gemini-tools.md](references/gemini-tools.md), [pi-tools.md](references/pi-tools.md), and [antigravity-tools.md](references/antigravity-tools.md). Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
 
 # Using Skills
 
@@ -48,30 +52,30 @@ Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/copilot-too
 ```dot
 digraph skill_flow {
     "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
-    "About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
+    "About to enter plan mode?" [shape=doublecircle];
     "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
     "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
     "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
-    "Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
+    "Invoke the skill" [shape=box];
     "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
     "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
-    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
+    "Create a todo per item" [shape=box];
     "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
     "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
 
-    "About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
+    "About to enter plan mode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
     "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
     "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
     "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
 
     "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
-    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
+    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke the skill" [label="yes, even 1%"];
     "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
-    "Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
+    "Invoke the skill" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
     "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
-    "Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
+    "Has checklist?" -> "Create a todo per item" [label="yes"];
     "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
-    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
+    "Create a todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
 }
 ```
 
@@ -98,15 +102,15 @@ These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
 
 When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
 
-1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
+1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, systematic-debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
 2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
 
 "Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
-"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
+"Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
 
 ## Skill Types
 
-**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
+**Rigid** (TDD, systematic-debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
 
 **Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
 

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/antigravity-tools.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# Antigravity CLI (`agy`) Tool Mapping
+
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On the Antigravity CLI (`agy`) these resolve to the tools below.
+
+| Action skills request | Antigravity CLI equivalent |
+|----------------------|----------------------|
+| Read a file | `view_file` |
+| Create a new file | `write_to_file` |
+| Edit a file | `replace_file_content` |
+| Edit a file in several places at once | `multi_replace_file_content` |
+| Run a shell command | `run_command` |
+| Search file contents | `grep_search` |
+| Find files by name / list a directory | `list_dir` (no dedicated glob tool — combine `list_dir` with `grep_search`) |
+| Fetch a URL | `read_url_content` |
+| Search the web | `search_web` |
+| Pose a structured question to your human partner | `ask_question` |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `invoke_subagent` with a built-in `TypeName` — `self` for full-capability work, `research` for read-only (see [Subagent support](#subagent-support)) |
+| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple entries in one `invoke_subagent` call's `Subagents` array |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | a **task artifact** — `write_to_file` with `IsArtifact: true` and `ArtifactType: "task"` (see [Task tracking](#task-tracking)). **Not** `manage_task`, which manages background processes. |
+
+## Invoking a skill — read its `SKILL.md`
+
+Antigravity surfaces every installed skill's `name` + `description` to you at the
+start of each session, but it has **no `Skill`/`activate_skill` tool**. To load a
+skill, **read its `SKILL.md` with `view_file`, setting `IsSkillFile: true`** when
+the skill applies — e.g. `view_file` on
+`.../plugins/superpowers/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` with `IsSkillFile: true`.
+(`IsSkillFile` is agy's own signal that you're reading a file to *execute its
+instructions*, not to edit or preview it — set it whenever you load a skill.)
+
+This is the blessed skill-loading mechanism on this harness. The general rule
+"never read skill files manually" means "don't bypass your platform's
+skill-loading mechanism" — and on Antigravity, reading `SKILL.md` *is* that
+mechanism. Reading it honors the rule rather than breaking it.
+
+You already know which skills exist and what they're for: their names and
+descriptions are in front of you at session start. When a description matches
+what you're about to do, read that skill's `SKILL.md` before acting.
+
+## Subagent support
+
+Antigravity dispatches subagents with `invoke_subagent`, passing each one a
+`TypeName` in the `Subagents` array. Two `TypeName`s are **built in** — use them
+directly, no `define_subagent` needed:
+
+- **`self`** — a full clone of you, with every tool you have (including
+  `write_to_file`/`replace_file_content`/`run_command`). The safe default for
+  general-purpose work: implementing, fixing, anything that edits files or runs
+  commands.
+- **`research`** — read-only (file reading, `grep_search`, web/URL fetch; no write
+  or command access). Use it when you specifically want a subagent that can't make
+  changes — investigation and read-only review.
+
+Call `define_subagent` only for a custom system prompt or capability mix: set
+`enable_write_tools: true` to grant file edits **and** `run_command`,
+`enable_subagent_tools` for nested dispatch, `enable_mcp_tools` for MCP. Then
+invoke it by the name you gave it. (`manage_subagents` lists/kills running
+subagents.)
+
+Skills dispatch with `Subagent (general-purpose):` and either reference a
+prompt-template file (e.g. `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`'s
+`./implementer-prompt.md`) or supply an inline prompt. On Antigravity:
+
+| Skill dispatch form | Antigravity equivalent |
+|---------------------|----------------------|
+| An implementer-style `*-prompt.md` template (writes code, runs tests) | Fill the template, then `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "self"` and the filled prompt |
+| A read-only reviewer template (`task-reviewer`, `code-reviewer`, `requesting-code-review`'s `./code-reviewer.md`) | `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "research"` and the filled review template |
+| Inline prompt (no template referenced) | `invoke_subagent` with `TypeName: "self"` (or `"research"` if the task only reads) and your inline prompt |
+
+### Prompt filling
+
+Skills provide prompt templates with placeholders like `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` or
+`[FULL TEXT of task]`. Fill all placeholders before passing the complete prompt to
+`invoke_subagent`. The prompt template itself contains the agent's role, review
+criteria, and expected output format — the subagent will follow it.
+
+### Parallel dispatch
+
+Put multiple entries in a single `invoke_subagent` call's `Subagents` array to run
+independent subagent work in parallel. Keep dependent tasks sequential, but do not
+serialize independent subagent tasks just to preserve a simpler history.
+
+## Task tracking
+
+Antigravity has **no todo / `TodoWrite` tool** (`manage_task` manages background
+processes — `list`/`kill`/`status`/`send_input` — it is *not* a checklist). When a
+skill says to create a todo list or track tasks, maintain a **task artifact**: a
+markdown checklist saved with `write_to_file` (`IsArtifact: true`,
+`ArtifactMetadata.ArtifactType: "task"`), edited with `replace_file_content` /
+`multi_replace_file_content` as you go.
+
+At the start of any multi-step task, create the task artifact listing every step of
+your plan. As you complete each step, edit the artifact to mark it done (`- [x]`).
+If the plan changes, update the checklist. Keep it current — it is your source of
+truth for what remains; once the conversation gets long, re-read it before starting
+each step.

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/claude-code-tools.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Claude Code Tool Mapping
+
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Claude Code these resolve to the tools below.
+
+## Tools
+
+| Action skills request | Claude Code tool |
+|----------------------|------------------|
+| Read a file | `Read` |
+| Create a new file | `Write` |
+| Edit a file | `Edit` |
+| Run a shell command | `Bash` |
+| Search file contents | `Grep` |
+| Find files by name | `Glob` |
+| Fetch a URL | `WebFetch` |
+| Search the web | `WebSearch` |
+| Invoke a skill | `Skill` |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `Agent` (older releases named this `Task`) |
+| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `Agent` calls in one response |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `TaskCreate`, `TaskUpdate`, `TaskList`, `TaskGet`; `TodoWrite` in `claude -p` / Agent SDK unless `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TASKS=1` is set |
+| Background-process / subagent lifecycle (read output, cancel) | `TaskOutput`, `TaskStop` — these are distinct from the todo tools above and apply to running shells, agents, and remote sessions |
+
+## Instructions file
+
+When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Claude Code this is **`CLAUDE.md`**. Claude Code walks up the directory tree from the current working directory and concatenates every `CLAUDE.md` and `CLAUDE.local.md` it finds along the way. Standard locations:
+
+| Scope | Location |
+|-------|----------|
+| Project (team-shared) | `./CLAUDE.md` or `./.claude/CLAUDE.md` |
+| User global | `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` |
+| Local-private (gitignored) | `./CLAUDE.local.md` |
+| Managed policy (org-wide) | `/Library/Application Support/ClaudeCode/CLAUDE.md` (macOS), `/etc/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` (Linux/WSL), `C:\Program Files\ClaudeCode\CLAUDE.md` (Windows) |
+
+CLAUDE.md files can pull in additional content with `@path/to/file` imports (relative or absolute, max five hops deep). Subdirectory `CLAUDE.md` files are also discovered automatically and loaded on-demand when Claude Code reads files in those subdirectories.
+
+Claude Code does **not** read `AGENTS.md` directly. If a project already maintains `AGENTS.md` for other agents, import it from `CLAUDE.md` so both runtimes share the same instructions:
+
+```markdown
+@AGENTS.md
+
+## Claude Code
+
+(Claude-Code-specific instructions go here.)
+```
+
+For path-scoped rules and larger-project organization, see `.claude/rules/` (rules can be scoped to specific files via `paths` frontmatter and load on demand).
+
+## Personal skills directory
+
+User-level skills live at **`~/.claude/skills/`**. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter) plus any supporting files. Claude Code does not currently recognize the cross-runtime `~/.agents/skills/` path that Codex, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI read; if you're relying on cross-runtime support in the future, verify against the [official skills docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills).

package/bundled/upstream/superpowers/skills/using-superpowers/references/codex-tools.md

@@ -1,17 +1,30 @@
 # Codex Tool Mapping
 
-Skills use Claude Code tool names. When you encounter these in a skill, use your platform equivalent:
-
-| Skill references | Codex equivalent |
-|-----------------|------------------|
-| `Task` tool (dispatch subagent) | `spawn_agent` (see [Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support](#subagent-dispatch-requires-multi-agent-support)) |
-| Multiple `Task` calls (parallel) | Multiple `spawn_agent` calls |
-| Task returns result | `wait_agent` |
-| Task completes automatically | `close_agent` to free slot |
-| `TodoWrite` (task tracking) | `update_plan` |
-| `Skill` tool (invoke a skill) | Skills load natively — just follow the instructions |
-| `Read`, `Write`, `Edit` (files) | Use your native file tools |
-| `Bash` (run commands) | Use your native shell tools |
+Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file"). On Codex these resolve to the tools below.
+
+| Action skills request | Codex equivalent |
+|----------------------|------------------|
+| Read a file | `shell` (e.g., `cat`, `head`, `tail`) — Codex reads files via shell |
+| Create / edit / delete a file | `apply_patch` (structured diff for create, update, delete) |
+| Run a shell command | `shell` |
+| Search file contents | `shell` (e.g., `grep`, `rg`) |
+| Find files by name | `shell` (e.g., `find`, `ls`) |
+| Fetch a URL | `shell` with `curl` / `wget` — Codex has no native fetch tool |
+| Search the web | `web_search` (enabled by default; configurable in `config.toml` via the top-level `web_search` setting — `live`, `cached`, or `disabled`) |
+| Invoke a skill | Skills load natively — just follow the instructions |
+| Dispatch a subagent (`Subagent (general-purpose):` template) | `spawn_agent` (see [Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support](#subagent-dispatch-requires-multi-agent-support)) |
+| Multiple parallel dispatches | Multiple `spawn_agent` calls in one response |
+| Wait for subagent result | `wait_agent` |
+| Free up subagent slot when done | `close_agent` |
+| Task tracking ("create a todo", "mark complete") | `update_plan` |
+
+## Instructions file
+
+When a skill mentions "your instructions file", on Codex this is **`AGENTS.md`** at the project root. Codex also reads `~/.codex/AGENTS.md` for global context, and an `AGENTS.override.md` (in the project tree or `~/.codex/`) takes precedence when present. Codex walks from the project root down to the current working directory, concatenating `AGENTS.md` files it finds along the way, up to `project_doc_max_bytes` (32 KiB by default).
+
+## Personal skills directory
+
+User-level skills live at **`$CODEX_HOME/skills/`** (default `~/.codex/skills/`). Codex also reads the cross-runtime path **`~/.agents/skills/`** (shared with Copilot CLI and Gemini CLI). When both directories exist at the same scope, Codex loads them both as separate skill catalogs — Codex's docs don't currently document a precedence between them. Each skill is a subdirectory containing a `SKILL.md` (with `name` and `description` frontmatter).
 
 ## Subagent dispatch requires multi-agent support