bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.8 → 6.0.1

package/src/modules/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/checklist.md

@@ -1,299 +0,0 @@
-# Market Research Report Validation Checklist
-
-## 🚨 CRITICAL: Source Verification and Fact-Checking (PRIORITY)
-
-### Source Citation Completeness
-
-- [ ] **EVERY** market size claim has at least 2 cited sources with URLs
-- [ ] **EVERY** growth rate/CAGR has cited sources with URLs
-- [ ] **EVERY** competitive data point (pricing, features, funding) has sources with URLs
-- [ ] **EVERY** customer statistic or insight has cited sources
-- [ ] **EVERY** industry trend claim has sources from {{current_year}} or recent years
-- [ ] All sources include: Name, Date, URL (clickable links)
-- [ ] No claims exist without verifiable sources
-
-### Source Quality and Credibility
-
-- [ ] Market size sources are HIGH credibility (Gartner, Forrester, IDC, government data, industry associations)
-- [ ] NOT relying on single blog posts or unverified sources for critical data
-- [ ] Sources are recent ({{current_year}} or within 1-2 years for time-sensitive data)
-- [ ] Primary sources prioritized over secondary/tertiary sources
-- [ ] Paywalled reports are cited with proper attribution (e.g., "Gartner Market Report 2025")
-
-### Multi-Source Verification (Critical Claims)
-
-- [ ] TAM calculation verified by at least 2 independent sources
-- [ ] SAM calculation methodology is transparent and sourced
-- [ ] SOM estimates are conservative and based on comparable benchmarks
-- [ ] Market growth rates corroborated by multiple analyst reports
-- [ ] Competitive market share data verified across sources
-
-### Conflicting Data Resolution
-
-- [ ] Where sources conflict, ALL conflicting estimates are presented
-- [ ] Variance between sources is explained (methodology, scope differences)
-- [ ] No arbitrary selection of "convenient" numbers without noting alternatives
-- [ ] Conflicting data is flagged with confidence levels
-- [ ] User is made aware of uncertainty in conflicting claims
-
-### Confidence Level Marking
-
-- [ ] Every major claim is marked with confidence level:
-  - **[Verified - 2+ sources]** = High confidence, multiple independent sources agree
-  - **[Single source - verify]** = Medium confidence, only one source found
-  - **[Estimated - low confidence]** = Low confidence, calculated/projected without strong sources
-- [ ] Low confidence claims are clearly flagged for user to verify independently
-- [ ] Speculative/projected data is labeled as PROJECTION or FORECAST, not presented as fact
-
-### Fact vs Analysis vs Speculation
-
-- [ ] Clear distinction between:
-  - **FACT:** Sourced data with citations (e.g., "Market is $5.2B [Source: Gartner 2025]")
-  - **ANALYSIS:** Interpretation of facts (e.g., "This suggests strong growth momentum")
-  - **SPECULATION:** Educated guesses (e.g., "This trend may continue if...")
-- [ ] Analysis and speculation are NOT presented as verified facts
-- [ ] Recommendations are based on sourced facts, not unsupported assumptions
-
-### Anti-Hallucination Verification
-
-- [ ] No invented statistics or "made up" market sizes
-- [ ] All percentages, dollar amounts, and growth rates are traceable to sources
-- [ ] If data couldn't be found, report explicitly states "No verified data available for [X]"
-- [ ] No use of vague sources like "industry experts say" without naming the expert/source
-- [ ] Version numbers, dates, and specific figures match source material exactly
-
-## Market Sizing Analysis (Source-Verified)
-
-### TAM Calculation Sources
-
-- [ ] TAM figure has at least 2 independent source citations
-- [ ] Calculation methodology is sourced (not invented)
-- [ ] Industry benchmarks used for sanity-check are cited
-- [ ] Growth rate assumptions are backed by sourced projections
-- [ ] Any adjustments or filters applied are justified and documented
-
-### SAM and SOM Source Verification
-
-- [ ] SAM constraints are based on sourced data (addressable market scope)
-- [ ] SOM competitive assumptions cite actual competitor data
-- [ ] Market share benchmarks reference comparable companies with sources
-- [ ] Scenarios (conservative/realistic/optimistic) are justified with sourced reasoning
-
-## Competitive Analysis (Source-Verified)
-
-### Competitor Data Source Verification
-
-- [ ] **EVERY** competitor mentioned has source for basic company info
-- [ ] Competitor pricing data has sources (website URLs, pricing pages, reviews)
-- [ ] Funding amounts cite sources (Crunchbase, press releases, SEC filings)
-- [ ] Product features verified through sources (official website, documentation, reviews)
-- [ ] Market positioning claims are backed by sources (analyst reports, company statements)
-- [ ] Customer count/user numbers cite sources (company announcements, verified reports)
-- [ ] Recent news and developments cite article URLs with dates from {{current_year}}
-
-### Competitive Data Credibility
-
-- [ ] Company websites/official sources used for product info (highest credibility)
-- [ ] Financial data from Crunchbase, PitchBook, or SEC filings (not rumors)
-- [ ] Review sites cited for customer sentiment (G2, Capterra, TrustPilot with URLs)
-- [ ] Pricing verified from official pricing pages (with URL and date checked)
-- [ ] No assumptions about competitors without sourced evidence
-
-### Competitive Claims Verification
-
-- [ ] Market share claims cite analyst reports or verified data
-- [ ] "Leading" or "dominant" claims backed by sourced market data
-- [ ] Competitor weaknesses cited from reviews, articles, or public statements (not speculation)
-- [ ] Product comparison claims verified (feature lists from official sources)
-
-## Customer Intelligence (Source-Verified)
-
-### Customer Data Sources
-
-- [ ] Customer segment data cites research sources (reports, surveys, studies)
-- [ ] Demographics/firmographics backed by census data, industry reports, or studies
-- [ ] Pain points sourced from customer research, reviews, surveys (not assumed)
-- [ ] Willingness to pay backed by pricing studies, surveys, or comparable market data
-- [ ] Buying behavior sourced from research studies or industry data
-- [ ] Jobs-to-be-Done insights cite customer research or validated frameworks
-
-### Customer Insight Credibility
-
-- [ ] Primary research (if conducted) documents sample size and methodology
-- [ ] Secondary research cites the original study/report with full attribution
-- [ ] Customer quotes or testimonials cite the source (interview, review site, case study)
-- [ ] Persona data based on real research findings (not fictional archetypes)
-- [ ] No invented customer statistics or behaviors without source backing
-
-### Positioning Analysis
-
-- [ ] Market positioning map uses relevant dimensions for the industry
-- [ ] White space opportunities are clearly identified
-- [ ] Differentiation strategy is supported by competitive gaps
-- [ ] Switching costs and barriers are quantified
-- [ ] Network effects and moats are assessed
-
-## Industry Analysis
-
-### Porter's Five Forces
-
-- [ ] Each force has a clear rating (Low/Medium/High) with justification
-- [ ] Specific examples and evidence support each assessment
-- [ ] Industry-specific factors are considered (not generic template)
-- [ ] Implications for strategy are drawn from each force
-- [ ] Overall industry attractiveness conclusion is provided
-
-### Trends and Dynamics
-
-- [ ] At least 5 major trends are identified with evidence
-- [ ] Technology disruptions are assessed for probability and timeline
-- [ ] Regulatory changes and their impacts are documented
-- [ ] Social/cultural shifts relevant to adoption are included
-- [ ] Market maturity stage is identified with supporting indicators
-
-## Strategic Recommendations
-
-### Go-to-Market Strategy
-
-- [ ] Target segment prioritization has clear rationale
-- [ ] Positioning statement is specific and differentiated
-- [ ] Channel strategy aligns with customer buying behavior
-- [ ] Partnership opportunities are identified with specific targets
-- [ ] Pricing strategy is justified by willingness-to-pay analysis
-
-### Opportunity Assessment
-
-- [ ] Each opportunity is sized quantitatively
-- [ ] Resource requirements are estimated (time, money, people)
-- [ ] Success criteria are measurable and time-bound
-- [ ] Dependencies and prerequisites are identified
-- [ ] Quick wins vs. long-term plays are distinguished
-
-### Risk Analysis
-
-- [ ] All major risk categories are covered (market, competitive, execution, regulatory)
-- [ ] Each risk has probability and impact assessment
-- [ ] Mitigation strategies are specific and actionable
-- [ ] Early warning indicators are defined
-- [ ] Contingency plans are outlined for high-impact risks
-
-## References and Source Documentation (CRITICAL)
-
-### References Section Completeness
-
-- [ ] Report includes comprehensive "References and Sources" section
-- [ ] Sources organized by category (market size, competitive, customer, trends)
-- [ ] Every source includes: Title/Name, Publisher, Date, Full URL
-- [ ] URLs are clickable and functional (not broken links)
-- [ ] Sources are numbered or organized for easy reference
-- [ ] Inline citations throughout report reference the sources section
-
-### Source Quality Metrics
-
-- [ ] Report documents total sources cited count
-- [ ] High confidence claims (2+ sources) count is reported
-- [ ] Single source claims are identified and counted
-- [ ] Low confidence/speculative claims are flagged
-- [ ] Web searches conducted count is included (for transparency)
-
-### Source Audit Trail
-
-- [ ] For each major section, sources are listed
-- [ ] TAM/SAM/SOM calculations show source for each number
-- [ ] Competitive data shows source for each competitor profile
-- [ ] Customer insights show research sources
-- [ ] Industry trends show article/report sources with dates
-
-### Citation Format Standards
-
-- [ ] Inline citations format: [Source: Company/Publication, Year, URL] or similar
-- [ ] Consistent citation style throughout document
-- [ ] No vague citations like "according to sources" without specifics
-- [ ] URLs are complete (not truncated)
-- [ ] Accessed/verified dates included for web sources
-
-## Document Quality
-
-### Anti-Hallucination Final Check
-
-- [ ] Read through entire report - does anything "feel" invented or too convenient?
-- [ ] Spot-check 5-10 random claims - can you find the cited source?
-- [ ] Check suspicious round numbers - are they actually from sources?
-- [ ] Verify any "shocking" statistics have strong sources
-- [ ] Cross-check key market size claims against multiple cited sources
-
-### Structure and Completeness
-
-- [ ] Executive summary captures all key insights
-- [ ] No placeholder text remains (all {{variables}} are replaced)
-- [ ] References section is complete and properly formatted
-- [ ] Source quality assessment included
-- [ ] Document ready for fact-checking by third party
-
-## Research Completeness
-
-### Coverage Check
-
-- [ ] All workflow steps were completed (none skipped without justification)
-- [ ] Optional analyses were considered and included where valuable
-- [ ] Web research was conducted for current market intelligence
-- [ ] Financial projections align with market size analysis
-- [ ] Implementation roadmap provides clear next steps
-
-### Validation
-
-- [ ] Key findings are triangulated across multiple sources
-- [ ] Surprising insights are double-checked for accuracy
-- [ ] Calculations are verified for mathematical accuracy
-- [ ] Conclusions logically follow from the analysis
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable and specific
-
-## Final Quality Assurance
-
-### Ready for Decision-Making
-
-- [ ] Research answers all initial objectives
-- [ ] Sufficient detail for investment decisions
-- [ ] Clear go/no-go recommendation provided
-- [ ] Success metrics are defined
-- [ ] Follow-up research needs are identified
-
-### Document Meta
-
-- [ ] Research date is current
-- [ ] Confidence levels are indicated for key assertions
-- [ ] Next review date is set
-- [ ] Distribution list is appropriate
-- [ ] Confidentiality classification is marked
-
----
-
-## Issues Found
-
-### Critical Issues
-
-_List any critical gaps or errors that must be addressed:_
-
-- [ ] Issue 1: [Description]
-- [ ] Issue 2: [Description]
-
-### Minor Issues
-
-_List minor improvements that would enhance the report:_
-
-- [ ] Issue 1: [Description]
-- [ ] Issue 2: [Description]
-
-### Additional Research Needed
-
-_List areas requiring further investigation:_
-
-- [ ] Topic 1: [Description]
-- [ ] Topic 2: [Description]
-
----
-
-**Validation Complete:** ☐ Yes ☐ No
-**Ready for Distribution:** ☐ Yes ☐ No
-**Reviewer:** **\*\***\_\_\_\_**\*\***
-**Date:** **\*\***\_\_\_\_**\*\***

package/src/modules/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/claude-code/injections.yaml

@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
-# Market Research Workflow - Claude Code Integration Configuration
-# This file configures how subagents are installed and integrated
-
-subagents:
-  # List of subagent files to be installed
-  files:
-    - bmm-market-researcher.md
-    - bmm-trend-spotter.md
-    - bmm-data-analyst.md
-    - bmm-competitor-analyzer.md
-    - bmm-user-researcher.md
-
-  # Installation configuration
-  installation:
-    prompt: "The Market Research workflow includes specialized AI subagents for enhanced research capabilities. Would you like to install them?"
-    location_options:
-      - project # Install to .claude/agents/ in project
-      - user # Install to ~/.claude/agents/ for all projects
-    default_location: project
-
-# Content injections for the workflow
-injections:
-  - injection_point: "market-research-subagents"
-    description: "Injects subagent activation instructions into the workflow"
-    content: |
-      <critical>
-      Claude Code Enhanced Mode: The following specialized subagents are available to enhance your market research:
-
-      - **bmm-market-researcher**: Comprehensive market intelligence gathering and analysis
-      - **bmm-trend-spotter**: Identifies emerging trends and weak signals
-      - **bmm-data-analyst**: Quantitative analysis and market sizing calculations
-      - **bmm-competitor-analyzer**: Deep competitive intelligence and positioning
-      - **bmm-user-researcher**: User research, personas, and journey mapping
-
-      These subagents will be automatically invoked when their expertise is relevant to the current research task.
-      Use them PROACTIVELY throughout the workflow for enhanced insights.
-      </critical>
-
-  - injection_point: "market-tam-calculations"
-    description: "Enhanced TAM calculation with data analyst"
-    content: |
-      <invoke-subagent name="bmm-data-analyst">
-      Calculate TAM using multiple methodologies and provide confidence intervals.
-      Use all available market data from previous research steps.
-      Show detailed calculations and assumptions.
-      </invoke-subagent>
-
-  - injection_point: "market-trends-analysis"
-    description: "Enhanced trend analysis with trend spotter"
-    content: |
-      <invoke-subagent name="bmm-trend-spotter">
-      Identify emerging trends, weak signals, and future disruptions.
-      Look for cross-industry patterns and second-order effects.
-      Provide timeline estimates for mainstream adoption.
-      </invoke-subagent>
-
-  - injection_point: "market-customer-segments"
-    description: "Enhanced customer research"
-    content: |
-      <invoke-subagent name="bmm-user-researcher">
-      Develop detailed user personas with jobs-to-be-done analysis.
-      Map the complete customer journey with pain points and opportunities.
-      Provide behavioral and psychographic insights.
-      </invoke-subagent>
-
-  - injection_point: "market-executive-summary"
-    description: "Enhanced executive summary synthesis"
-    content: |
-      <invoke-subagent name="bmm-market-researcher">
-      Synthesize all research findings into a compelling executive summary.
-      Highlight the most critical insights and strategic implications.
-      Ensure all key metrics and recommendations are captured.
-      </invoke-subagent>
-
-# Configuration for subagent behavior
-configuration:
-  auto_invoke: true # Automatically invoke subagents when relevant
-  parallel_execution: true # Allow parallel subagent execution
-  cache_results: true # Cache subagent outputs for reuse
-
-  # Subagent-specific configurations
-  subagent_config:
-    bmm-market-researcher:
-      priority: high
-      max_execution_time: 300 # seconds
-      retry_on_failure: true
-
-    bmm-trend-spotter:
-      priority: medium
-      max_execution_time: 180
-      retry_on_failure: false
-
-    bmm-data-analyst:
-      priority: high
-      max_execution_time: 240
-      retry_on_failure: true
-
-    bmm-competitor-analyzer:
-      priority: high
-      max_execution_time: 300
-      retry_on_failure: true
-
-    bmm-user-researcher:
-      priority: medium
-      max_execution_time: 240
-      retry_on_failure: false
-
-# Metadata
-metadata:
-  compatible_with: "claude-code-1.0+"
-  workflow: "market-research"
-  module: "bmm"
-  author: "BMad Builder"
-  description: "Claude Code enhancements for comprehensive market research"