bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.8 → 6.0.1

package/.bmad/bmm/docs/test-architecture.md

@@ -1,394 +0,0 @@
----
-last-redoc-date: 2025-11-05
----
-
-# Test Architect (TEA) Agent Guide
-
-## Overview
-
-- **Persona:** Murat, Master Test Architect and Quality Advisor focused on risk-based testing, fixture architecture, ATDD, and CI/CD governance.
-- **Mission:** Deliver actionable quality strategies, automation coverage, and gate decisions that scale with project complexity and compliance demands.
-- **Use When:** BMad Method or Enterprise track projects, integration risk is non-trivial, brownfield regression risk exists, or compliance/NFR evidence is required. (Quick Flow projects typically don't require TEA)
-
-## TEA Workflow Lifecycle
-
-TEA integrates into the BMad development lifecycle during Solutioning (Phase 3) and Implementation (Phase 4):
-
-```mermaid
-%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor':'#fff','primaryTextColor':'#000','primaryBorderColor':'#000','lineColor':'#000','secondaryColor':'#fff','tertiaryColor':'#fff','fontSize':'16px','fontFamily':'arial'}}}%%
-graph TB
-    subgraph Phase2["<b>Phase 2: PLANNING</b>"]
-        PM["<b>PM: *prd (creates PRD + epics)</b>"]
-        PlanNote["<b>Business requirements phase</b>"]
-        PM -.-> PlanNote
-    end
-
-    subgraph Phase3["<b>Phase 3: SOLUTIONING</b>"]
-        Architecture["<b>Architect: *architecture</b>"]
-        Framework["<b>TEA: *framework</b>"]
-        CI["<b>TEA: *ci</b>"]
-        GateCheck["<b>Architect: *solutioning-gate-check</b>"]
-        Architecture --> Framework
-        Framework --> CI
-        CI --> GateCheck
-        Phase3Note["<b>Test infrastructure AFTER architecture</b><br/>defines technology stack"]
-        Framework -.-> Phase3Note
-    end
-
-    subgraph Phase4["<b>Phase 4: IMPLEMENTATION - Per Epic Cycle</b>"]
-        SprintPlan["<b>SM: *sprint-planning</b>"]
-        TestDesign["<b>TEA: *test-design (per epic)</b>"]
-        CreateStory["<b>SM: *create-story</b>"]
-        ATDD["<b>TEA: *atdd (optional, before dev)</b>"]
-        DevImpl["<b>DEV: implements story</b>"]
-        Automate["<b>TEA: *automate</b>"]
-        TestReview1["<b>TEA: *test-review (optional)</b>"]
-        Trace1["<b>TEA: *trace (refresh coverage)</b>"]
-
-        SprintPlan --> TestDesign
-        TestDesign --> CreateStory
-        CreateStory --> ATDD
-        ATDD --> DevImpl
-        DevImpl --> Automate
-        Automate --> TestReview1
-        TestReview1 --> Trace1
-        Trace1 -.->|next story| CreateStory
-        TestDesignNote["<b>Test design: 'How do I test THIS epic?'</b><br/>Creates test-design-epic-N.md per epic"]
-        TestDesign -.-> TestDesignNote
-    end
-
-    subgraph Gate["<b>EPIC/RELEASE GATE</b>"]
-        NFR["<b>TEA: *nfr-assess (if not done earlier)</b>"]
-        TestReview2["<b>TEA: *test-review (final audit, optional)</b>"]
-        TraceGate["<b>TEA: *trace - Phase 2: Gate</b>"]
-        GateDecision{"<b>Gate Decision</b>"}
-
-        NFR --> TestReview2
-        TestReview2 --> TraceGate
-        TraceGate --> GateDecision
-        GateDecision -->|PASS| Pass["<b>PASS ✅</b>"]
-        GateDecision -->|CONCERNS| Concerns["<b>CONCERNS ⚠️</b>"]
-        GateDecision -->|FAIL| Fail["<b>FAIL ❌</b>"]
-        GateDecision -->|WAIVED| Waived["<b>WAIVED ⏭️</b>"]
-    end
-
-    Phase2 --> Phase3
-    Phase3 --> Phase4
-    Phase4 --> Gate
-
-    style Phase2 fill:#bbdefb,stroke:#0d47a1,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Phase3 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Phase4 fill:#e1bee7,stroke:#4a148c,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Gate fill:#ffe082,stroke:#f57c00,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Pass fill:#4caf50,stroke:#1b5e20,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Concerns fill:#ffc107,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Fail fill:#f44336,stroke:#b71c1c,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-    style Waived fill:#9c27b0,stroke:#4a148c,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
-```
-
-**Phase Numbering Note:** BMad uses a 4-phase methodology with optional Phase 0/1:
-
-- **Phase 0** (Optional): Documentation (brownfield prerequisite - `*document-project`)
-- **Phase 1** (Optional): Discovery/Analysis (`*brainstorm`, `*research`, `*product-brief`)
-- **Phase 2** (Required): Planning (`*prd` creates PRD + epics)
-- **Phase 3** (Track-dependent): Solutioning (`*architecture` → TEA: `*framework`, `*ci` → `*solutioning-gate-check`)
-- **Phase 4** (Required): Implementation (`*sprint-planning` → per-epic: `*test-design` → per-story: dev workflows)
-
-**TEA workflows:** `*framework` and `*ci` run once in Phase 3 after architecture. `*test-design` runs per-epic in Phase 4. Output: `test-design-epic-N.md`.
-
-Quick Flow track skips Phases 0, 1, and 3. BMad Method and Enterprise use all phases based on project needs.
-
-### Why TEA is Different from Other BMM Agents
-
-TEA is the only BMM agent that operates in **multiple phases** (Phase 3 and Phase 4) and has its own **knowledge base architecture**.
-
-<details>
-<summary><strong>Cross-Phase Operation & Unique Architecture</strong></summary>
-
-### Phase-Specific Agents (Standard Pattern)
-
-Most BMM agents work in a single phase:
-
-- **Phase 1 (Analysis)**: Analyst agent
-- **Phase 2 (Planning)**: PM agent
-- **Phase 3 (Solutioning)**: Architect agent
-- **Phase 4 (Implementation)**: SM, DEV agents
-
-### TEA: Multi-Phase Quality Agent (Unique Pattern)
-
-TEA is **the only agent that operates in multiple phases**:
-
-```
-Phase 1 (Analysis) → [TEA not typically used]
-    ↓
-Phase 2 (Planning) → [PM defines requirements - TEA not active]
-    ↓
-Phase 3 (Solutioning) → TEA: *framework, *ci (test infrastructure AFTER architecture)
-    ↓
-Phase 4 (Implementation) → TEA: *test-design (per epic: "how do I test THIS feature?")
-                        → TEA: *atdd, *automate, *test-review, *trace (per story)
-    ↓
-Epic/Release Gate → TEA: *nfr-assess, *trace Phase 2 (release decision)
-```
-
-### TEA's 8 Workflows Across Phases
-
-**Standard agents**: 1-3 workflows per phase
-**TEA**: 8 workflows across Phase 3, Phase 4, and Release Gate
-
-| Phase       | TEA Workflows                                         | Frequency        | Purpose                                        |
-| ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
-| **Phase 2** | (none)                                                | -                | Planning phase - PM defines requirements       |
-| **Phase 3** | *framework, *ci                                       | Once per project | Setup test infrastructure AFTER architecture   |
-| **Phase 4** | *test-design, *atdd, *automate, *test-review, \*trace | Per epic/story   | Test planning per epic, then per-story testing |
-| **Release** | *nfr-assess, *trace (Phase 2: gate)                   | Per epic/release | Go/no-go decision                              |
-
-**Note**: `*trace` is a two-phase workflow: Phase 1 (traceability) + Phase 2 (gate decision). This reduces cognitive load while maintaining natural workflow.
-
-### Unique Directory Architecture
-
-TEA is the only BMM agent with its own top-level module directory (`bmm/testarch/`):
-
-```
-src/modules/bmm/
-├── agents/
-│   └── tea.agent.yaml          # Agent definition (standard location)
-├── workflows/
-│   └── testarch/               # TEA workflows (standard location)
-└── testarch/                   # Knowledge base (UNIQUE!)
-    ├── knowledge/              # 21 production-ready test pattern fragments
-    ├── tea-index.csv           # Centralized knowledge lookup (21 fragments indexed)
-    └── README.md               # This guide
-```
-
-### Why TEA Gets Special Treatment
-
-TEA uniquely requires:
-
-- **Extensive domain knowledge**: 21 fragments, 12,821 lines covering test patterns, CI/CD, fixtures, quality practices, healing strategies
-- **Centralized reference system**: `tea-index.csv` for on-demand fragment loading during workflow execution
-- **Cross-cutting concerns**: Domain-specific testing patterns (vs project-specific artifacts like PRDs/stories)
-- **Optional MCP integration**: Healing, exploratory, and verification modes for enhanced testing capabilities
-
-This architecture enables TEA to maintain consistent, production-ready testing patterns across all BMad projects while operating across multiple development phases.
-
-</details>
-
-## High-Level Cheat Sheets
-
-These cheat sheets map TEA workflows to the **BMad Method and Enterprise tracks** across the **4-Phase Methodology** (Phase 1: Analysis, Phase 2: Planning, Phase 3: Solutioning, Phase 4: Implementation).
-
-**Note:** Quick Flow projects typically don't require TEA (covered in Overview). These cheat sheets focus on BMad Method and Enterprise tracks where TEA adds value.
-
-**Legend for Track Deltas:**
-
-- ➕ = New workflow or phase added (doesn't exist in baseline)
-- 🔄 = Modified focus (same workflow, different emphasis or purpose)
-- 📦 = Additional output or archival requirement
-
-### Greenfield - BMad Method (Simple/Standard Work)
-
-**Planning Track:** BMad Method (PRD + Architecture)
-**Use Case:** New projects with standard complexity
-
-| Workflow Stage             | Test Architect                                                    | Dev / Team                                           | Outputs                                                    |
-| -------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
-| **Phase 1**: Discovery     | -                                                                 | Analyst `*product-brief` (optional)                  | `product-brief.md`                                         |
-| **Phase 2**: Planning      | -                                                                 | PM `*prd` (creates PRD + epics)                      | PRD, epics                                                 |
-| **Phase 3**: Solutioning   | Run `*framework`, `*ci` AFTER architecture                        | Architect `*architecture`, `*solutioning-gate-check` | Architecture, test scaffold, CI pipeline                   |
-| **Phase 4**: Sprint Start  | -                                                                 | SM `*sprint-planning`                                | Sprint status file with all epics and stories              |
-| **Phase 4**: Epic Planning | Run `*test-design` for THIS epic (per-epic test plan)             | Review epic scope                                    | `test-design-epic-N.md` with risk assessment and test plan |
-| **Phase 4**: Story Dev     | (Optional) `*atdd` before dev, then `*automate` after             | SM `*create-story`, DEV implements                   | Tests, story implementation                                |
-| **Phase 4**: Story Review  | Execute `*test-review` (optional), re-run `*trace`                | Address recommendations, update code/tests           | Quality report, refreshed coverage matrix                  |
-| **Phase 4**: Release Gate  | (Optional) `*test-review` for final audit, Run `*trace` (Phase 2) | Confirm Definition of Done, share release notes      | Quality audit, Gate YAML + release summary                 |
-
-<details>
-<summary>Execution Notes</summary>
-
-- Run `*framework` only once per repo or when modern harness support is missing.
-- **Phase 3 (Solutioning)**: After architecture is complete, run `*framework` and `*ci` to setup test infrastructure based on architectural decisions.
-- **Phase 4 starts**: After solutioning is complete, sprint planning loads all epics.
-- **`*test-design` runs per-epic**: At the beginning of working on each epic, run `*test-design` to create a test plan for THAT specific epic/feature. Output: `test-design-epic-N.md`.
-- Use `*atdd` before coding when the team can adopt ATDD; share its checklist with the dev agent.
-- Post-implementation, keep `*trace` current, expand coverage with `*automate`, optionally review test quality with `*test-review`. For release gate, run `*trace` with Phase 2 enabled to get deployment decision.
-- Use `*test-review` after `*atdd` to validate generated tests, after `*automate` to ensure regression quality, or before gate for final audit.
-
-</details>
-
-<details>
-<summary>Worked Example – “Nova CRM” Greenfield Feature</summary>
-
-1. **Planning (Phase 2):** Analyst runs `*product-brief`; PM executes `*prd` to produce PRD and epics.
-2. **Solutioning (Phase 3):** Architect completes `*architecture` for the new module; TEA sets up test infrastructure via `*framework` and `*ci` based on architectural decisions; gate check validates planning completeness.
-3. **Sprint Start (Phase 4):** Scrum Master runs `*sprint-planning` to load all epics into sprint status.
-4. **Epic 1 Planning (Phase 4):** TEA runs `*test-design` to create test plan for Epic 1, producing `test-design-epic-1.md` with risk assessment.
-5. **Story Implementation (Phase 4):** For each story in Epic 1, SM generates story via `*create-story`; TEA optionally runs `*atdd`; Dev implements with guidance from failing tests.
-6. **Post-Dev (Phase 4):** TEA runs `*automate`, optionally `*test-review` to audit test quality, re-runs `*trace` to refresh coverage.
-7. **Release Gate:** TEA runs `*trace` with Phase 2 enabled to generate gate decision.
-
-</details>
-
-### Brownfield - BMad Method or Enterprise (Simple or Complex)
-
-**Planning Tracks:** BMad Method or Enterprise Method
-**Use Case:** Existing codebases - simple additions (BMad Method) or complex enterprise requirements (Enterprise Method)
-
-**🔄 Brownfield Deltas from Greenfield:**
-
-- ➕ Phase 0 (Documentation) - Document existing codebase if undocumented
-- ➕ Phase 2: `*trace` - Baseline existing test coverage before planning
-- 🔄 Phase 4: `*test-design` - Focus on regression hotspots and brownfield risks
-- 🔄 Phase 4: Story Review - May include `*nfr-assess` if not done earlier
-
-| Workflow Stage                | Test Architect                                                               | Dev / Team                                           | Outputs                                                                |
-| ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| **Phase 0**: Documentation ➕ | -                                                                            | Analyst `*document-project` (if undocumented)        | Comprehensive project documentation                                    |
-| **Phase 1**: Discovery        | -                                                                            | Analyst/PM/Architect rerun planning workflows        | Updated planning artifacts in `{output_folder}`                        |
-| **Phase 2**: Planning         | Run ➕ `*trace` (baseline coverage)                                          | PM `*prd` (creates PRD + epics)                      | PRD, epics, ➕ coverage baseline                                       |
-| **Phase 3**: Solutioning      | Run `*framework`, `*ci` AFTER architecture                                   | Architect `*architecture`, `*solutioning-gate-check` | Architecture, test framework, CI pipeline                              |
-| **Phase 4**: Sprint Start     | -                                                                            | SM `*sprint-planning`                                | Sprint status file with all epics and stories                          |
-| **Phase 4**: Epic Planning    | Run `*test-design` for THIS epic 🔄 (regression hotspots)                    | Review epic scope and brownfield risks               | `test-design-epic-N.md` with brownfield risk assessment and mitigation |
-| **Phase 4**: Story Dev        | (Optional) `*atdd` before dev, then `*automate` after                        | SM `*create-story`, DEV implements                   | Tests, story implementation                                            |
-| **Phase 4**: Story Review     | Apply `*test-review` (optional), re-run `*trace`, ➕ `*nfr-assess` if needed | Resolve gaps, update docs/tests                      | Quality report, refreshed coverage matrix, NFR report                  |
-| **Phase 4**: Release Gate     | (Optional) `*test-review` for final audit, Run `*trace` (Phase 2)            | Capture sign-offs, share release notes               | Quality audit, Gate YAML + release summary                             |
-
-<details>
-<summary>Execution Notes</summary>
-
-- Lead with `*trace` during Planning (Phase 2) to baseline existing test coverage before architecture work begins.
-- **Phase 3 (Solutioning)**: After architecture is complete, run `*framework` and `*ci` to modernize test infrastructure. For brownfield, framework may need to integrate with or replace existing test setup.
-- **Phase 4 starts**: After solutioning is complete and sprint planning loads all epics.
-- **`*test-design` runs per-epic**: At the beginning of working on each epic, run `*test-design` to identify regression hotspots, integration risks, and mitigation strategies for THAT specific epic/feature. Output: `test-design-epic-N.md`.
-- Use `*atdd` when stories benefit from ATDD; otherwise proceed to implementation and rely on post-dev automation.
-- After development, expand coverage with `*automate`, optionally review test quality with `*test-review`, re-run `*trace` (Phase 2 for gate decision). Run `*nfr-assess` now if non-functional risks weren't addressed earlier.
-- Use `*test-review` to validate existing brownfield tests or audit new tests before gate.
-
-</details>
-
-<details>
-<summary>Worked Example – “Atlas Payments” Brownfield Story</summary>
-
-1. **Planning (Phase 2):** PM executes `*prd` to update PRD and `epics.md` (Epic 1: Payment Processing); TEA runs `*trace` to baseline existing coverage.
-2. **Solutioning (Phase 3):** Architect triggers `*architecture` capturing legacy payment flows and integration architecture; TEA sets up `*framework` and `*ci` based on architectural decisions; gate check validates planning.
-3. **Sprint Start (Phase 4):** Scrum Master runs `*sprint-planning` to load Epic 1 into sprint status.
-4. **Epic 1 Planning (Phase 4):** TEA runs `*test-design` for Epic 1 (Payment Processing), producing `test-design-epic-1.md` that flags settlement edge cases, regression hotspots, and mitigation plans.
-5. **Story Implementation (Phase 4):** For each story in Epic 1, SM generates story via `*create-story`; TEA runs `*atdd` producing failing Playwright specs; Dev implements with guidance from tests and checklist.
-6. **Post-Dev (Phase 4):** TEA applies `*automate`, optionally `*test-review` to audit test quality, re-runs `*trace` to refresh coverage.
-7. **Release Gate:** TEA performs `*nfr-assess` to validate SLAs, runs `*trace` with Phase 2 enabled to generate gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL).
-
-</details>
-
-### Greenfield - Enterprise Method (Enterprise/Compliance Work)
-
-**Planning Track:** Enterprise Method (BMad Method + extended security/devops/test strategies)
-**Use Case:** New enterprise projects with compliance, security, or complex regulatory requirements
-
-**🏢 Enterprise Deltas from BMad Method:**
-
-- ➕ Phase 1: `*research` - Domain and compliance research (recommended)
-- ➕ Phase 2: `*nfr-assess` - Capture NFR requirements early (security/performance/reliability)
-- 🔄 Phase 4: `*test-design` - Enterprise focus (compliance, security architecture alignment)
-- 📦 Release Gate - Archive artifacts and compliance evidence for audits
-
-| Workflow Stage             | Test Architect                                                           | Dev / Team                                           | Outputs                                                            |
-| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| **Phase 1**: Discovery     | -                                                                        | Analyst ➕ `*research`, `*product-brief`             | Domain research, compliance analysis, product brief                |
-| **Phase 2**: Planning      | Run ➕ `*nfr-assess`                                                     | PM `*prd` (creates PRD + epics), UX `*create-design` | Enterprise PRD, epics, UX design, ➕ NFR documentation             |
-| **Phase 3**: Solutioning   | Run `*framework`, `*ci` AFTER architecture                               | Architect `*architecture`, `*solutioning-gate-check` | Architecture, test framework, CI pipeline                          |
-| **Phase 4**: Sprint Start  | -                                                                        | SM `*sprint-planning`                                | Sprint plan with all epics                                         |
-| **Phase 4**: Epic Planning | Run `*test-design` for THIS epic 🔄 (compliance focus)                   | Review epic scope and compliance requirements        | `test-design-epic-N.md` with security/performance/compliance focus |
-| **Phase 4**: Story Dev     | (Optional) `*atdd`, `*automate`, `*test-review`, `*trace` per story      | SM `*create-story`, DEV implements                   | Tests, fixtures, quality reports, coverage matrices                |
-| **Phase 4**: Release Gate  | Final `*test-review` audit, Run `*trace` (Phase 2), 📦 archive artifacts | Capture sign-offs, 📦 compliance evidence            | Quality audit, updated assessments, gate YAML, 📦 audit trail      |
-
-<details>
-<summary>Execution Notes</summary>
-
-- `*nfr-assess` runs early in Planning (Phase 2) to capture compliance, security, and performance requirements upfront.
-- **Phase 3 (Solutioning)**: After architecture is complete, run `*framework` and `*ci` with enterprise-grade configurations (selective testing, burn-in jobs, caching, notifications).
-- **Phase 4 starts**: After solutioning is complete and sprint planning loads all epics.
-- **`*test-design` runs per-epic**: At the beginning of working on each epic, run `*test-design` to create an enterprise-focused test plan for THAT specific epic, ensuring alignment with security architecture, performance targets, and compliance requirements. Output: `test-design-epic-N.md`.
-- Use `*atdd` for stories when feasible so acceptance tests can lead implementation.
-- Use `*test-review` per story or sprint to maintain quality standards and ensure compliance with testing best practices.
-- Prior to release, rerun coverage (`*trace`, `*automate`), perform final quality audit with `*test-review`, and formalize the decision with `*trace` Phase 2 (gate decision); archive artifacts for compliance audits.
-
-</details>
-
-<details>
-<summary>Worked Example – “Helios Ledger” Enterprise Release</summary>
-
-1. **Planning (Phase 2):** Analyst runs `*research` and `*product-brief`; PM completes `*prd` creating PRD and epics; TEA runs `*nfr-assess` to establish NFR targets.
-2. **Solutioning (Phase 3):** Architect completes `*architecture` with enterprise considerations; TEA sets up `*framework` and `*ci` with enterprise-grade configurations based on architectural decisions; gate check validates planning completeness.
-3. **Sprint Start (Phase 4):** Scrum Master runs `*sprint-planning` to load all epics into sprint status.
-4. **Per-Epic (Phase 4):** For each epic, TEA runs `*test-design` to create epic-specific test plan (e.g., `test-design-epic-1.md`, `test-design-epic-2.md`) with compliance-focused risk assessment.
-5. **Per-Story (Phase 4):** For each story, TEA uses `*atdd`, `*automate`, `*test-review`, and `*trace`; Dev teams iterate on the findings.
-6. **Release Gate:** TEA re-checks coverage, performs final quality audit with `*test-review`, and logs the final gate decision via `*trace` Phase 2, archiving artifacts for compliance.
-
-</details>
-
-## Command Catalog
-
-<details>
-<summary><strong>Optional Playwright MCP Enhancements</strong></summary>
-
-**Two Playwright MCP servers** (actively maintained, continuously updated):
-
-- `playwright` - Browser automation (`npx @playwright/mcp@latest`)
-- `playwright-test` - Test runner with failure analysis (`npx playwright run-test-mcp-server`)
-
-**How MCP Enhances TEA Workflows**:
-
-MCP provides additional capabilities on top of TEA's default AI-based approach:
-
-1. `*test-design`:
-   - Default: Analysis + documentation
-   - **+ MCP**: Interactive UI discovery with `browser_navigate`, `browser_click`, `browser_snapshot`, behavior observation
-
-   Benefit: Discover actual functionality, edge cases, undocumented features
-
-2. `*atdd`, `*automate`:
-   - Default: Infers selectors and interactions from requirements and knowledge fragments
-   - **+ MCP**: Generates tests **then** verifies with `generator_setup_page`, `browser_*` tools, validates against live app
-
-   Benefit: Accurate selectors from real DOM, verified behavior, refined test code
-
-3. `*automate`:
-   - Default: Pattern-based fixes from error messages + knowledge fragments
-   - **+ MCP**: Pattern fixes **enhanced with** `browser_snapshot`, `browser_console_messages`, `browser_network_requests`, `browser_generate_locator`
-
-   Benefit: Visual failure context, live DOM inspection, root cause discovery
-
-**Config example**:
-
-```json
-{
-  "mcpServers": {
-    "playwright": {
-      "command": "npx",
-      "args": ["@playwright/mcp@latest"]
-    },
-    "playwright-test": {
-      "command": "npx",
-      "args": ["playwright", "run-test-mcp-server"]
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**To disable**: Set `tea_use_mcp_enhancements: false` in `.bmad/bmm/config.yaml` OR remove MCPs from IDE config.
-
-</details>
-
-<br></br>
-
-| Command        | Workflow README                                   | Primary Outputs                                                                               | Notes                                                | With Playwright MCP Enhancements                                                                             |
-| -------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| `*framework`   | [📖](../workflows/testarch/framework/README.md)   | Playwright/Cypress scaffold, `.env.example`, `.nvmrc`, sample specs                           | Use when no production-ready harness exists          | -                                                                                                            |
-| `*ci`          | [📖](../workflows/testarch/ci/README.md)          | CI workflow, selective test scripts, secrets checklist                                        | Platform-aware (GitHub Actions default)              | -                                                                                                            |
-| `*test-design` | [📖](../workflows/testarch/test-design/README.md) | Combined risk assessment, mitigation plan, and coverage strategy                              | Risk scoring + optional exploratory mode             | **+ Exploratory**: Interactive UI discovery with browser automation (uncover actual functionality)           |
-| `*atdd`        | [📖](../workflows/testarch/atdd/README.md)        | Failing acceptance tests + implementation checklist                                           | TDD red phase + optional recording mode              | **+ Recording**: AI generation verified with live browser (accurate selectors from real DOM)                 |
-| `*automate`    | [📖](../workflows/testarch/automate/README.md)    | Prioritized specs, fixtures, README/script updates, DoD summary                               | Optional healing/recording, avoid duplicate coverage | **+ Healing**: Pattern fixes enhanced with visual debugging + **+ Recording**: AI verified with live browser |
-| `*test-review` | [📖](../workflows/testarch/test-review/README.md) | Test quality review report with 0-100 score, violations, fixes                                | Reviews tests against knowledge base patterns        | -                                                                                                            |
-| `*nfr-assess`  | [📖](../workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/README.md)  | NFR assessment report with actions                                                            | Focus on security/performance/reliability            | -                                                                                                            |
-| `*trace`       | [📖](../workflows/testarch/trace/README.md)       | Phase 1: Coverage matrix, recommendations. Phase 2: Gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED) | Two-phase workflow: traceability + gate decision     | -                                                                                                            |
-
-**📖** = Click to view detailed workflow documentation