bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.2 → 6.0.0-alpha.4

package/src/modules/bmm/docs/enterprise-agentic-development.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1040 @@
+# Enterprise Agentic Development with BMad Method
+
+**Understanding the paradigm shift from traditional to AI-assisted team development**
+
+**Reading Time:** ~25 minutes
+
+---
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+- [The Paradigm Shift](#the-paradigm-shift)
+- [Traditional vs Agentic Development](#traditional-vs-agentic-development)
+- [Team Collaboration Patterns](#team-collaboration-patterns)
+- [Work Distribution Strategies](#work-distribution-strategies)
+- [Enterprise Configuration](#enterprise-configuration)
+- [Git Submodule Approach](#git-submodule-approach)
+- [Team Workflows](#team-workflows)
+- [Best Practices](#best-practices)
+- [Common Scenarios](#common-scenarios)
+
+---
+
+## The Paradigm Shift
+
+### Traditional Agile Development
+
+In classic agile teams:
+
+- **Epic duration:** Multiple sprints (4-12 weeks)
+- **Story duration:** 2-5 days per developer, sometimes 2 weeks
+- **Team size:** 5-9 developers per epic
+- **Parallelization:** Multiple developers work on stories within same epic
+- **Velocity:** 20-40 story points per 2-week sprint (team)
+- **Epic delivery:** Months for complex features
+
+### Agentic Development with BMM
+
+With AI-assisted development:
+
+- **Epic duration:** Hours to days (not weeks)
+- **Story duration:** 30 minutes to 4 hours per developer+agent
+- **Team size:** 1-2 developers can complete full epics
+- **Parallelization:** Developers work on separate epics
+- **Velocity:** What took months now takes days
+- **Epic delivery:** Days for complex features, hours for simple ones
+
+### The Core Difference
+
+**Traditional:** Stories are sized for human developers working alone
+**Agentic:** Stories are sized for human+AI collaboration, dramatically increasing throughput
+
+**Result:** A single developer with AI agents can now complete in one day what previously required a full team and multiple sprints.
+
+---
+
+## Traditional vs Agentic Development
+
+### Story Complexity Comparison
+
+**Traditional Agile Story (2-week duration):**
+
+```markdown
+## User Story: Add Payment Processing
+
+As a user, I want to process payments so I can complete purchases.
+
+### Tasks
+
+- Research payment gateway options (2 days)
+- Design API integration (1 day)
+- Implement backend payment service (3 days)
+- Create frontend payment form (2 days)
+- Add validation and error handling (1 day)
+- Write unit tests (1 day)
+- Write integration tests (1 day)
+- Security review (1 day)
+
+**Estimate:** 10-12 days (2 weeks)
+```
+
+**BMM Agentic Story (2-4 hours):**
+
+```markdown
+## Story 1: Implement Stripe Payment Backend API
+
+**Epic:** Payment Processing
+**Estimate:** 2h with AI agent
+
+### Context
+
+- Use existing /api pattern
+- Follow auth middleware conventions
+- Integrate with Stripe SDK (already in package.json)
+
+### Acceptance Criteria
+
+- POST /api/payments/charge endpoint
+- Validation middleware
+- Error handling per API standards
+- Unit tests with 80%+ coverage
+```
+
+The epic is broken into 6-8 small stories instead of 1 large story. Each story takes 2-4 hours instead of 2 weeks.
+
+### Epic Delivery Comparison
+
+**Traditional Epic: "Payment Processing" (8-12 weeks)**
+
+- Sprint 1-2: Payment gateway research and design
+- Sprint 3-4: Backend implementation
+- Sprint 5-6: Frontend implementation
+- Sprint 7-8: Testing, security, deployment
+- **Team:** 3-5 developers
+- **Total:** 2-3 months
+
+**Agentic Epic: "Payment Processing" (1-3 days)**
+
+- Day 1 AM: Backend API stories (3-4 stories)
+- Day 1 PM: Frontend integration stories (2-3 stories)
+- Day 2: Testing, security validation (2-3 stories)
+- **Team:** 1-2 developers + AI agents
+- **Total:** 1-3 days
+
+---
+
+## Team Collaboration Patterns
+
+### Old Pattern: Stories as Work Units
+
+**Traditional Agile:**
+
+```
+Epic: User Dashboard (8 weeks)
+├─ Story 1: Backend API (Dev A, Sprint 1-2)
+├─ Story 2: Frontend Layout (Dev B, Sprint 1-2)
+├─ Story 3: Data Visualization (Dev C, Sprint 2-3)
+├─ Story 4: User Preferences (Dev D, Sprint 3-4)
+└─ Story 5: Integration Testing (Team, Sprint 4)
+
+Team: 4 developers working in parallel on stories within one epic
+```
+
+**Challenge:** Coordination overhead, merge conflicts, integration issues
+
+### New Pattern: Epics as Work Units
+
+**Agentic Development:**
+
+```
+Project: Analytics Platform (2-3 weeks)
+
+Developer A:
+├─ Epic 1: User Dashboard (3 days, 12 stories)
+│   └─ Stories completed sequentially with AI agents
+
+Developer B:
+├─ Epic 2: Admin Panel (4 days, 15 stories)
+│   └─ Stories completed sequentially with AI agents
+
+Developer C:
+├─ Epic 3: Reporting Engine (5 days, 18 stories)
+│   └─ Stories completed sequentially with AI agents
+
+Team: 3 developers working in parallel on separate epics
+```
+
+**Benefits:** Minimal coordination, epic-level ownership, clear boundaries
+
+---
+
+## Work Distribution Strategies
+
+### Strategy 1: Epic-Based Distribution (Recommended)
+
+**Best for:** Teams of 2-10 developers
+
+**Approach:**
+
+- Each developer owns complete epics
+- Work sequentially through stories within epic
+- Parallel work happens at epic level
+
+**Example:**
+
+```yaml
+# sprint-status.yaml
+epics:
+  - id: epic-1
+    title: Payment Processing
+    owner: alice
+    status: in-progress
+    stories: 8
+
+  - id: epic-2
+    title: User Dashboard
+    owner: bob
+    status: in-progress
+    stories: 12
+
+  - id: epic-3
+    title: Admin Panel
+    owner: carol
+    status: backlog
+    stories: 10
+```
+
+**Benefits:**
+
+- Clear ownership and accountability
+- Minimal merge conflicts
+- Epic-level cohesion
+- Reduced coordination overhead
+
+### Strategy 2: Layer-Based Distribution
+
+**Best for:** Full-stack applications, teams with specialized skills
+
+**Approach:**
+
+- Split epics by architectural layer
+- Frontend and backend as separate epics
+- Each developer owns their layer
+
+**Example:**
+
+```
+Project: E-commerce Platform
+
+Frontend Developer:
+├─ Epic 1: Product Catalog UI (3 days)
+├─ Epic 3: Shopping Cart UI (2 days)
+└─ Epic 5: Checkout Flow UI (3 days)
+
+Backend Developer:
+├─ Epic 2: Product API (2 days)
+├─ Epic 4: Cart Service (2 days)
+└─ Epic 6: Payment Processing (3 days)
+```
+
+**Note:** This is abnormal in traditional agile (vertical slicing preferred), but works well in agentic development due to speed of delivery.
+
+**Benefits:**
+
+- Developers work in their expertise area
+- Can work truly in parallel
+- Clear API contracts between layers
+
+**Considerations:**
+
+- Requires clear API contracts upfront
+- Need integration testing coordination
+- Best with strong architecture phase
+
+### Strategy 3: Feature-Based Distribution
+
+**Best for:** Large teams (10+ developers), enterprise projects
+
+**Approach:**
+
+- Group related epics into features
+- Each developer/pod owns feature set
+- Features can span multiple subsystems
+
+**Example:**
+
+```
+Feature Team A (2 devs): Payments & Billing
+├─ Epic 1: Payment Processing
+├─ Epic 2: Subscription Management
+├─ Epic 3: Invoice Generation
+└─ Epic 4: Billing Dashboard
+
+Feature Team B (2 devs): User Management
+├─ Epic 5: Authentication
+├─ Epic 6: Authorization
+├─ Epic 7: User Profiles
+└─ Epic 8: Account Settings
+
+Feature Team C (2 devs): Analytics
+├─ Epic 9: Event Tracking
+├─ Epic 10: Reporting Engine
+└─ Epic 11: Dashboard Widgets
+```
+
+---
+
+## Enterprise Configuration
+
+### Challenge: Personalized BMM Content in Shared Repos
+
+**Problem:**
+
+- Developers may customize agents, workflows, or configurations
+- Teams may use different methodologies (BMM, custom, other frameworks)
+- Organizations don't want personalized tooling committed to main repo
+- Different developers use different AI tools, MCPs, or agent systems
+
+**Anti-pattern (Don't do this):**
+
+```bash
+# .gitignore approach - breaks many tools
+bmad/
+.claude/
+```
+
+**Issues with .gitignore:**
+
+- IDE tools lose track of context
+- Submodule management breaks
+- Team can't optionally share configurations
+- Hard to version control shared vs personal configs
+
+### Solution: Git Submodules
+
+**Recommended approach:** Install BMM as a git submodule that each developer controls independently.
+
+---
+
+## Git Submodule Approach
+
+### Why Submodules?
+
+**Benefits:**
+
+- BMM content exists in project but tracked separately
+- Each developer controls their own BMM version/configuration
+- Optional: Share team configurations via separate repo
+- IDE tools maintain proper context
+- Cleaner than .gitignore for this use case
+
+### Setup for New Projects
+
+**1. Create BMM submodule (optional team config repo):**
+
+```bash
+# In your organization
+git init bmm-config
+cd bmm-config
+npx bmad-method install
+# Customize for team standards
+git add .
+git commit -m "Initial BMM configuration for team"
+git push origin main
+```
+
+**2. Add submodule to main project:**
+
+```bash
+# In your main project repo
+cd /path/to/your-project
+
+# Add BMM as submodule (using team config repo)
+git submodule add https://github.com/your-org/bmm-config.git bmad
+
+# Or add as submodule (using official BMM)
+git submodule add https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git bmad
+
+# Commit submodule reference
+git add .gitmodules bmad
+git commit -m "Add BMM as submodule"
+```
+
+**3. Team members clone and initialize:**
+
+```bash
+# Clone main project
+git clone https://github.com/your-org/your-project.git
+cd your-project
+
+# Initialize submodule
+git submodule update --init --recursive
+
+# Each developer can now customize their bmad/ without affecting others
+cd bmad
+# Make personal customizations
+# These changes stay local unless pushed to submodule repo
+```
+
+### Setup for Existing Projects
+
+**If BMM already installed directly:**
+
+```bash
+# 1. Backup existing BMM
+mv bmad bmad-backup
+
+# 2. Add as submodule
+git submodule add https://github.com/your-org/bmm-config.git bmad
+
+# 3. Restore customizations
+cp -r bmad-backup/bmad/_cfg/agents/*.customize.yaml bmad/bmad/_cfg/agents/
+
+# 4. Clean up
+rm -rf bmad-backup
+
+# 5. Commit
+git add .gitmodules bmad
+git commit -m "Convert BMM to submodule"
+```
+
+### Submodule Workflow
+
+**Daily development:**
+
+```bash
+# Work in main project - submodule is just there
+cd /path/to/your-project
+# BMM content available at ./bmad/
+# Load agents, run workflows normally
+```
+
+**Update personal BMM config:**
+
+```bash
+cd bmad
+# Make changes to your personal config
+git add .
+git commit -m "Personal agent customizations"
+# Don't push unless sharing with team
+```
+
+**Update to latest team BMM config:**
+
+```bash
+cd bmad
+git pull origin main
+cd ..
+git add bmad
+git commit -m "Update BMM to latest team config"
+```
+
+**Share configuration with team:**
+
+```bash
+cd bmad
+# Make team-beneficial changes
+git add .
+git commit -m "Add shared epic template for our domain"
+git push origin main
+# Tell team to update their submodules
+```
+
+### Team Configuration Sharing
+
+**Option 1: Fully Personal (No sharing)**
+
+```bash
+# Each developer's bmad/ is independent
+# No submodule repo - just local installation
+# Use .gitignore for bmad/ (acceptable here)
+```
+
+**Option 2: Team Baseline + Personal Customization**
+
+```bash
+# Submodule repo has team standards
+# bmad/bmad/_cfg/agents/pm.customize.yaml (team)
+# Each dev adds personal customizations locally
+# Personal changes not pushed to submodule
+```
+
+**Option 3: Full Team Sharing**
+
+```bash
+# All configurations in submodule repo
+# Team collaborates on agent improvements
+# Everyone pulls updates regularly
+```
+
+### Multi-Tool Teams
+
+**Scenario:** Team uses different AI tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, custom)
+
+**Approach:**
+
+```
+bmad/
+├─ bmad/_cfg/
+│   ├─ ides/
+│   │   ├─ claude-code.yaml (shared)
+│   │   ├─ cursor.yaml (shared)
+│   │   └─ windsurf.yaml (shared)
+│   └─ agents/
+│       ├─ pm.customize.yaml (personal - not in submodule)
+│       └─ architect.customize.yaml (personal - not in submodule)
+└─ .claude/
+    └─ commands/ (generated, IDE-specific)
+```
+
+**Each developer:**
+
+- Uses submodule for core BMM content
+- Personalizes IDE-specific configurations locally
+- Optionally shares improvements back to submodule
+
+---
+
+## Team Workflows
+
+### Workflow 1: Epic Assignment
+
+**Phase 2: Planning Complete**
+
+```bash
+# After PRD + Architecture complete
+# Team lead or PM reviews epics
+
+# sprint-status.yaml
+epics:
+  - id: epic-1
+    title: Payment Processing
+    owner: unassigned
+    stories: 8
+  - id: epic-2
+    title: User Dashboard
+    owner: unassigned
+    stories: 12
+```
+
+**Epic Assignment Meeting:**
+
+1. Review epic scope and dependencies
+2. Assign epics to developers based on expertise/capacity
+3. Identify any epic dependencies (must be sequential)
+4. Update sprint-status.yaml with assignments
+
+**Result:**
+
+```yaml
+epics:
+  - id: epic-1
+    title: Payment Processing
+    owner: alice
+    dependencies: []
+
+  - id: epic-2
+    title: User Dashboard
+    owner: bob
+    dependencies: [epic-1] # Needs payment API
+```
+
+### Workflow 2: Daily Development
+
+**Developer's daily flow:**
+
+```bash
+# 1. Check epic status
+cat docs/sprint-status.yaml
+
+# 2. Load SM agent, run epic-tech-context (if first story)
+# Creates epic-specific technical guidance
+
+# 3. Load SM agent, run create-story
+# Creates next story in epic
+
+# 4. Load SM agent, run story-context
+# Generates implementation context
+
+# 5. Load DEV agent, run dev-story
+# Implement story (30min - 4hrs)
+
+# 6. Load DEV agent, run code-review
+# Review implementation
+
+# 7. Load SM agent, run story-done
+# Mark complete, advance queue
+
+# 8. Repeat steps 3-7 until epic complete
+
+# 9. Load SM agent, run retrospective
+# Epic retrospective
+```
+
+**Typical day for developer:**
+
+- Complete 3-8 stories (one epic, or partial epic)
+- Push code at epic boundaries or daily
+- Minimal coordination needed
+
+### Workflow 3: Integration Points
+
+**When epics have dependencies:**
+
+**Epic 1 (Backend - Alice) complete:**
+
+```bash
+# Alice commits and pushes
+git add .
+git commit -m "feat: complete Payment Processing epic (epic-1)"
+git push origin feature/payment-processing
+
+# Updates team
+# "Epic 1 complete - payment API ready at /api/payments/*"
+```
+
+**Epic 2 (Frontend - Bob) ready to start:**
+
+```bash
+# Bob pulls latest
+git pull origin main  # After Alice's PR merged
+
+# Runs epic-tech-context with updated codebase
+# Context now includes Alice's payment API
+
+# Proceeds with stories
+```
+
+### Workflow 4: Code Review in Teams
+
+**Two approaches:**
+
+**Approach A: Epic-Level Review**
+
+- Developer completes entire epic
+- Opens PR for epic
+- Team reviews full epic implementation
+- Faster, maintains epic cohesion
+
+**Approach B: Story-Level Review**
+
+- Developer commits after each story
+- Opens PR per story or after N stories
+- More granular feedback
+- Better for learning teams
+
+**Recommended:** Epic-level review for experienced teams, story-level for learning teams.
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### 1. Epic Ownership & Accountability
+
+**Do:**
+
+- Assign entire epic to one developer
+- Developer owns epic from context → stories → implementation → retrospective
+- Clear epic boundaries minimize conflicts
+
+**Don't:**
+
+- Split epic across multiple developers (coordination overhead)
+- Reassign epics mid-implementation (context loss)
+
+### 2. Dependency Management
+
+**Do:**
+
+- Identify epic dependencies in planning
+- Document required API contracts between dependent epics
+- Complete prerequisite epics before starting dependent ones
+- Use feature flags if parallel work needed
+
+**Don't:**
+
+- Assume epics are fully independent
+- Start dependent epic before prerequisite ready
+- Change API contracts without team coordination
+
+### 3. Communication Cadence
+
+**Traditional agile:** Daily standups essential for coordination
+
+**Agentic development:** Lighter coordination needed
+
+**Recommended cadence:**
+
+- **Daily async updates:** "Epic 1, 60% complete, no blockers"
+- **Twice-weekly sync:** 15min check-in on progress/blockers
+- **Epic completion sync:** Brief demo, integration discussion
+- **Sprint retro:** After all epics complete
+
+### 4. Branch Strategy
+
+**Feature branches per epic:**
+
+```bash
+# Each developer works on epic branch
+feature/epic-1-payment-processing    (Alice)
+feature/epic-2-user-dashboard        (Bob)
+feature/epic-3-admin-panel           (Carol)
+
+# PR and merge when epic complete
+# Or: commit per story, PR at epic completion
+```
+
+**Benefits:**
+
+- Clean separation of work
+- Easy to review epic as unit
+- Simple rollback if needed
+
+### 5. Testing Strategy
+
+**Story-level:**
+
+- Unit tests per story (DoD requirement)
+- Agent writes tests during dev-story
+
+**Epic-level:**
+
+- Integration tests across epic stories
+- Create "Epic Integration Testing" story at epic end
+
+**Project-level:**
+
+- E2E tests after multiple epics complete
+- Can be separate epic: "E2E Test Suite"
+
+### 6. Documentation Updates
+
+**Real-time updates:**
+
+- `sprint-status.yaml` - Updated by story-done workflow
+- Story files - Updated by agents during implementation
+
+**Epic completion:**
+
+- Architecture docs - Update if epic changed architecture
+- API docs - Update if epic added/modified APIs
+- README - Update if epic affects setup/usage
+
+**Sprint completion:**
+
+- Retrospective insights incorporated
+- Lessons learned documented
+
+### 7. Submodule Maintenance
+
+**Weekly:**
+
+- Check for BMM updates (if using official as submodule)
+- Pull team configuration changes (if using team config)
+
+**Monthly:**
+
+- Review customizations (are they still needed?)
+- Share useful customizations with team
+- Clean up unused configurations
+
+**Per project:**
+
+- Initialize submodule for new team members
+- Document any project-specific BMM configurations
+
+### 8. Handling Conflicts
+
+**Scenario:** Two epics modify same file
+
+**Prevention:**
+
+- Architecture phase should identify shared code
+- Create "shared component" epic that runs first
+- Or: use feature flags and modular design
+
+**Resolution:**
+
+```bash
+# Epic 1 complete, merged to main
+# Epic 2 encounters conflict
+
+# Developer updates branch
+git checkout feature/epic-2
+git merge main
+# Resolve conflicts manually
+# Re-run affected story tests
+git add .
+git commit -m "Merge main, resolve conflicts"
+```
+
+### 9. Scaling to Large Teams
+
+**10-20 developers:**
+
+- Organize into feature pods (2-4 devs per pod)
+- Each pod owns related epics
+- Pod-level coordination, minimal cross-pod
+
+**20+ developers:**
+
+- Multiple product areas
+- Each area has own PRD, architecture
+- Areas can work fully independently
+- Quarterly integration points
+
+**100+ developers:**
+
+- Multiple products/services
+- Each uses BMM independently
+- Shared component teams provide APIs
+- Microservices architecture essential
+
+### 10. Metrics & Velocity
+
+**Track differently than traditional agile:**
+
+**Traditional metrics:**
+
+- Story points per sprint (team)
+- Velocity trends
+- Burndown charts
+
+**Agentic metrics:**
+
+- Epics per week (per developer)
+- Stories per day (per developer)
+- Time to epic completion
+- Code quality metrics (test coverage, review findings)
+
+**Example velocity:**
+
+- Junior dev + AI: 1-2 epics/week (8-15 stories)
+- Mid-level dev + AI: 2-3 epics/week (15-25 stories)
+- Senior dev + AI: 3-5 epics/week (25-40 stories)
+
+---
+
+## Common Scenarios
+
+### Scenario 1: Startup (2-3 developers)
+
+**Project:** SaaS MVP (Level 3)
+
+**Team:**
+
+- Developer A (Full-stack, tech lead)
+- Developer B (Full-stack)
+
+**Distribution:**
+
+```
+Developer A:
+├─ Epic 1: Authentication & User Management (3 days)
+├─ Epic 3: Payment Integration (2 days)
+└─ Epic 5: Admin Dashboard (3 days)
+
+Developer B:
+├─ Epic 2: Core Product Features (4 days)
+├─ Epic 4: Analytics & Reporting (3 days)
+└─ Epic 6: Notification System (2 days)
+
+Total: ~2 weeks with parallel work
+Traditional estimate: 3-4 months with same team
+```
+
+**Coordination:**
+
+- Daily async Slack updates
+- Weekly 30min sync call
+- Epic completion demos
+- Shared docs/sprint-status.yaml in main repo
+
+**BMM Setup:**
+
+- BMM installed directly (small team, shared approach)
+- Both use Claude Code
+- Minimal customization needed
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 2: Mid-Size Team (8-10 developers)
+
+**Project:** Enterprise Platform Enhancement (Level 4)
+
+**Team:**
+
+- 2 Backend developers
+- 2 Frontend developers
+- 2 Full-stack developers
+- 1 DevOps engineer
+- 1 QA engineer (E2E testing epic)
+
+**Distribution (Layer-Based):**
+
+```
+Backend Team:
+Developer 1:
+├─ Epic 1: Payment Service API (3 days)
+├─ Epic 3: Subscription Service (3 days)
+└─ Epic 5: Webhook System (2 days)
+
+Developer 2:
+├─ Epic 2: User Management API (3 days)
+├─ Epic 4: Analytics API (3 days)
+└─ Epic 6: Admin API (2 days)
+
+Frontend Team:
+Developer 3:
+├─ Epic 7: Payment UI (2 days)
+├─ Epic 9: Subscription Dashboard (3 days)
+└─ Epic 11: User Settings (2 days)
+
+Developer 4:
+├─ Epic 8: Analytics Dashboard (3 days)
+├─ Epic 10: Admin Panel (3 days)
+└─ Epic 12: Notification Center (2 days)
+
+Full-Stack Team:
+Developer 5:
+├─ Epic 13: Real-time Features (4 days)
+└─ Epic 15: Search System (3 days)
+
+Developer 6:
+├─ Epic 14: Reporting Engine (4 days)
+└─ Epic 16: Export Functionality (3 days)
+
+DevOps:
+Developer 7:
+├─ Epic 17: CI/CD Pipeline (3 days)
+├─ Epic 18: Monitoring & Alerts (2 days)
+└─ Epic 19: Performance Optimization (3 days)
+
+QA:
+Developer 8:
+└─ Epic 20: E2E Test Suite (5 days, after others complete)
+
+Total: ~3 weeks with parallel work
+Traditional estimate: 9-12 months with same team
+```
+
+**Coordination:**
+
+- Bi-weekly sprint planning (epic assignment)
+- Async daily updates in Slack
+- Epic completion PRs reviewed by tech lead
+- Weekly integration testing
+
+**BMM Setup:**
+
+- Git submodule approach
+- Team config repo with shared baselines
+- Personal customizations local only
+- Mix of Claude Code, Cursor users
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 3: Large Enterprise (50+ developers)
+
+**Project:** Multi-Product Platform (Multiple Level 4 projects)
+
+**Organization:**
+
+- 5 product teams (8-10 devs each)
+- 1 platform team (10 devs - shared services)
+- 1 infrastructure team (5 devs)
+
+**Distribution (Feature-Based):**
+
+```
+Product Team A: Payments Product
+├─ 10 epics across 8 developers
+└─ 2-week delivery
+
+Product Team B: User Management Product
+├─ 12 epics across 10 developers
+└─ 2-week delivery
+
+Product Team C: Analytics Product
+├─ 8 epics across 8 developers
+└─ 1.5-week delivery
+
+Product Team D: Admin Tools
+├─ 10 epics across 8 developers
+└─ 2-week delivery
+
+Product Team E: Mobile Apps
+├─ 15 epics across 10 developers
+└─ 3-week delivery
+
+Platform Team: Shared Services
+├─ 15 epics across 10 developers
+└─ Continuous delivery
+
+Infrastructure Team: DevOps & Platform
+├─ 8 epics across 5 developers
+└─ Continuous delivery
+```
+
+**Coordination:**
+
+- Product teams work independently
+- Platform team provides APIs, runs 1 week ahead
+- Quarterly integration milestones
+- Automated testing & deployment
+
+**BMM Setup:**
+
+- Each team has own submodule config
+- Org-wide base configuration repo
+- Team-specific customizations in team repos
+- Variety of IDE tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code + extensions)
+
+**Traditional estimate:** 2-3 years with same team size
+**Agentic delivery:** 3-4 months
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+### Key Takeaways
+
+1. **Epics are the new stories** - Work distribution happens at epic level, not story level
+2. **Velocity transformation** - What took months now takes days
+3. **Team scaling** - Smaller teams can deliver enterprise-scale projects
+4. **Git submodules** - Best practice for enterprise BMM management
+5. **Reduced coordination** - Epic ownership minimizes coordination overhead
+6. **Layer splitting viable** - Frontend/backend epic splits work well at high velocity
+7. **Tool flexibility** - Teams can use different AI tools with same BMM foundation
+
+### The Bottom Line
+
+**Traditional Agile:**
+
+- Story = Unit of work assignment
+- Multiple developers per epic
+- Coordination intensive
+- Months for epic delivery
+
+**Agentic Development:**
+
+- Epic = Unit of work assignment
+- One developer per epic
+- Minimal coordination
+- Days for epic delivery
+
+**Result:** Rethink team structure, work distribution, and coordination patterns for 10-50x productivity gains.
+
+---
+
+## Related Documentation
+
+- **[FAQ](./faq.md)** - Common questions
+- **[Scale Adaptive System](./scale-adaptive-system.md)** - Understanding project levels
+- **[Quick Start Guide](./quick-start.md)** - Getting started
+- **[Workflows Guide](../workflows/README.md)** - Complete workflow reference
+- **[Glossary](./glossary.md)** - Key terminology
+
+---
+
+_Agentic development fundamentally changes how we structure teams, distribute work, and coordinate efforts. Understanding these patterns is essential for enterprise success with BMM._