bmad-method 5.1.3 → 6.0.0-alpha.1

package/bmad-core/workflows/greenfield-service.yaml

@@ -1,206 +0,0 @@
-workflow:
-  id: greenfield-service
-  name: Greenfield Service/API Development
-  description: >-
-    Agent workflow for building backend services from concept to development.
-    Supports both comprehensive planning for complex services and rapid prototyping for simple APIs.
-  type: greenfield
-  project_types:
-    - rest-api
-    - graphql-api
-    - microservice
-    - backend-service
-    - api-prototype
-    - simple-service
-
-  sequence:
-    - agent: analyst
-      creates: project-brief.md
-      optional_steps:
-        - brainstorming_session
-        - market_research_prompt
-      notes: "Can do brainstorming first, then optional deep research before creating project brief. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final project-brief.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: pm
-      creates: prd.md
-      requires: project-brief.md
-      notes: "Creates PRD from project brief using prd-tmpl, focused on API/service requirements. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: architect
-      creates: architecture.md
-      requires: prd.md
-      optional_steps:
-        - technical_research_prompt
-      notes: "Creates backend/service architecture using architecture-tmpl. May suggest changes to PRD stories or new stories. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: pm
-      updates: prd.md (if needed)
-      requires: architecture.md
-      condition: architecture_suggests_prd_changes
-      notes: "If architect suggests story changes, update PRD and re-export the complete unredacted prd.md to docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: po
-      validates: all_artifacts
-      uses: po-master-checklist
-      notes: "Validates all documents for consistency and completeness. May require updates to any document."
-
-    - agent: various
-      updates: any_flagged_documents
-      condition: po_checklist_issues
-      notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: po
-      action: shard_documents
-      creates: sharded_docs
-      requires: all_artifacts_in_project
-      notes: |
-        Shard documents for IDE development:
-        - Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
-        - Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
-        - Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
-
-    - agent: sm
-      action: create_story
-      creates: story.md
-      requires: sharded_docs
-      repeats: for_each_epic
-      notes: |
-        Story creation cycle:
-        - SM Agent (New Chat): @sm → *create
-        - Creates next story from sharded docs
-        - Story starts in "Draft" status
-
-    - agent: analyst/pm
-      action: review_draft_story
-      updates: story.md
-      requires: story.md
-      optional: true
-      condition: user_wants_story_review
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
-        - NOTE: story-review task coming soon
-        - Review story completeness and alignment
-        - Update story status: Draft → Approved
-
-    - agent: dev
-      action: implement_story
-      creates: implementation_files
-      requires: story.md
-      notes: |
-        Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
-        - Implements approved story
-        - Updates File List with all changes
-        - Marks story as "Review" when complete
-
-    - agent: qa
-      action: review_implementation
-      updates: implementation_files
-      requires: implementation_files
-      optional: true
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
-        - Senior dev review with refactoring ability
-        - Fixes small issues directly
-        - Leaves checklist for remaining items
-        - Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
-
-    - agent: dev
-      action: address_qa_feedback
-      updates: implementation_files
-      condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
-      notes: |
-        If QA left unchecked items:
-        - Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
-        - Return to QA for final approval
-
-    - repeat_development_cycle:
-      action: continue_for_all_stories
-      notes: |
-        Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
-        Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
-
-    - agent: po
-      action: epic_retrospective
-      creates: epic-retrospective.md
-      condition: epic_complete
-      optional: true
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: After epic completion
-        - NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
-        - Validate epic was completed correctly
-        - Document learnings and improvements
-
-    - workflow_end:
-      action: project_complete
-      notes: |
-        All stories implemented and reviewed!
-        Service development phase complete.
-
-        Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
-
-  flow_diagram: |
-    ```mermaid
-    graph TD
-        A[Start: Service Development] --> B[analyst: project-brief.md]
-        B --> C[pm: prd.md]
-        C --> D[architect: architecture.md]
-        D --> E{Architecture suggests PRD changes?}
-        E -->|Yes| F[pm: update prd.md]
-        E -->|No| G[po: validate all artifacts]
-        F --> G
-        G --> H{PO finds issues?}
-        H -->|Yes| I[Return to relevant agent for fixes]
-        H -->|No| J[po: shard documents]
-        I --> G
-        
-        J --> K[sm: create story]
-        K --> L{Review draft story?}
-        L -->|Yes| M[analyst/pm: review & approve story]
-        L -->|No| N[dev: implement story]
-        M --> N
-        N --> O{QA review?}
-        O -->|Yes| P[qa: review implementation]
-        O -->|No| Q{More stories?}
-        P --> R{QA found issues?}
-        R -->|Yes| S[dev: address QA feedback]
-        R -->|No| Q
-        S --> P
-        Q -->|Yes| K
-        Q -->|No| T{Epic retrospective?}
-        T -->|Yes| U[po: epic retrospective]
-        T -->|No| V[Project Complete]
-        U --> V
-
-        B -.-> B1[Optional: brainstorming]
-        B -.-> B2[Optional: market research]
-        D -.-> D1[Optional: technical research]
-
-        style V fill:#90EE90
-        style J fill:#ADD8E6
-        style K fill:#ADD8E6
-        style N fill:#ADD8E6
-        style B fill:#FFE4B5
-        style C fill:#FFE4B5
-        style D fill:#FFE4B5
-        style M fill:#F0E68C
-        style P fill:#F0E68C
-        style U fill:#F0E68C
-    ```
-
-  decision_guidance:
-    when_to_use:
-      - Building production APIs or microservices
-      - Multiple endpoints and complex business logic
-      - Need comprehensive documentation and testing
-      - Multiple team members will be involved
-      - Long-term maintenance expected
-      - Enterprise or external-facing APIs
-
-  handoff_prompts:
-    analyst_to_pm: "Project brief is complete. Save it as docs/project-brief.md in your project, then create the PRD."
-    pm_to_architect: "PRD is ready. Save it as docs/prd.md in your project, then create the service architecture."
-    architect_review: "Architecture complete. Save it as docs/architecture.md. Do you suggest any changes to the PRD stories or need new stories added?"
-    architect_to_pm: "Please update the PRD with the suggested story changes, then re-export the complete prd.md to docs/."
-    updated_to_po: "All documents ready in docs/ folder. Please validate all artifacts for consistency."
-    po_issues: "PO found issues with [document]. Please return to [agent] to fix and re-save the updated document."
-    complete: "All planning artifacts validated and saved in docs/ folder. Move to IDE environment to begin development."

package/bmad-core/workflows/greenfield-ui.yaml

@@ -1,235 +0,0 @@
-workflow:
-  id: greenfield-ui
-  name: Greenfield UI/Frontend Development
-  description: >-
-    Agent workflow for building frontend applications from concept to development.
-    Supports both comprehensive planning for complex UIs and rapid prototyping for simple interfaces.
-  type: greenfield
-  project_types:
-    - spa
-    - mobile-app
-    - micro-frontend
-    - static-site
-    - ui-prototype
-    - simple-interface
-
-  sequence:
-    - agent: analyst
-      creates: project-brief.md
-      optional_steps:
-        - brainstorming_session
-        - market_research_prompt
-      notes: "Can do brainstorming first, then optional deep research before creating project brief. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final project-brief.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: pm
-      creates: prd.md
-      requires: project-brief.md
-      notes: "Creates PRD from project brief using prd-tmpl, focused on UI/frontend requirements. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: ux-expert
-      creates: front-end-spec.md
-      requires: prd.md
-      optional_steps:
-        - user_research_prompt
-      notes: "Creates UI/UX specification using front-end-spec-tmpl. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final front-end-spec.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: ux-expert
-      creates: v0_prompt (optional)
-      requires: front-end-spec.md
-      condition: user_wants_ai_generation
-      notes: "OPTIONAL BUT RECOMMENDED: Generate AI UI prompt for tools like v0, Lovable, etc. Use the generate-ai-frontend-prompt task. User can then generate UI in external tool and download project structure."
-
-    - agent: architect
-      creates: front-end-architecture.md
-      requires: front-end-spec.md
-      optional_steps:
-        - technical_research_prompt
-        - review_generated_ui_structure
-      notes: "Creates frontend architecture using front-end-architecture-tmpl. If user generated UI with v0/Lovable, can incorporate the project structure into architecture. May suggest changes to PRD stories or new stories. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final front-end-architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: pm
-      updates: prd.md (if needed)
-      requires: front-end-architecture.md
-      condition: architecture_suggests_prd_changes
-      notes: "If architect suggests story changes, update PRD and re-export the complete unredacted prd.md to docs/ folder."
-
-    - agent: po
-      validates: all_artifacts
-      uses: po-master-checklist
-      notes: "Validates all documents for consistency and completeness. May require updates to any document."
-
-    - agent: various
-      updates: any_flagged_documents
-      condition: po_checklist_issues
-      notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
-
-    - project_setup_guidance:
-      action: guide_project_structure
-      condition: user_has_generated_ui
-      notes: "If user generated UI with v0/Lovable: For polyrepo setup, place downloaded project in separate frontend repo. For monorepo, place in apps/web or frontend/ directory. Review architecture document for specific guidance."
-
-    - agent: po
-      action: shard_documents
-      creates: sharded_docs
-      requires: all_artifacts_in_project
-      notes: |
-        Shard documents for IDE development:
-        - Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
-        - Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
-        - Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
-
-    - agent: sm
-      action: create_story
-      creates: story.md
-      requires: sharded_docs
-      repeats: for_each_epic
-      notes: |
-        Story creation cycle:
-        - SM Agent (New Chat): @sm → *create
-        - Creates next story from sharded docs
-        - Story starts in "Draft" status
-
-    - agent: analyst/pm
-      action: review_draft_story
-      updates: story.md
-      requires: story.md
-      optional: true
-      condition: user_wants_story_review
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
-        - NOTE: story-review task coming soon
-        - Review story completeness and alignment
-        - Update story status: Draft → Approved
-
-    - agent: dev
-      action: implement_story
-      creates: implementation_files
-      requires: story.md
-      notes: |
-        Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
-        - Implements approved story
-        - Updates File List with all changes
-        - Marks story as "Review" when complete
-
-    - agent: qa
-      action: review_implementation
-      updates: implementation_files
-      requires: implementation_files
-      optional: true
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
-        - Senior dev review with refactoring ability
-        - Fixes small issues directly
-        - Leaves checklist for remaining items
-        - Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
-
-    - agent: dev
-      action: address_qa_feedback
-      updates: implementation_files
-      condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
-      notes: |
-        If QA left unchecked items:
-        - Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
-        - Return to QA for final approval
-
-    - repeat_development_cycle:
-      action: continue_for_all_stories
-      notes: |
-        Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
-        Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
-
-    - agent: po
-      action: epic_retrospective
-      creates: epic-retrospective.md
-      condition: epic_complete
-      optional: true
-      notes: |
-        OPTIONAL: After epic completion
-        - NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
-        - Validate epic was completed correctly
-        - Document learnings and improvements
-
-    - workflow_end:
-      action: project_complete
-      notes: |
-        All stories implemented and reviewed!
-        Project development phase complete.
-
-        Reference: {root}/data/bmad-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
-
-  flow_diagram: |
-    ```mermaid
-    graph TD
-        A[Start: UI Development] --> B[analyst: project-brief.md]
-        B --> C[pm: prd.md]
-        C --> D[ux-expert: front-end-spec.md]
-        D --> D2{Generate v0 prompt?}
-        D2 -->|Yes| D3[ux-expert: create v0 prompt]
-        D2 -->|No| E[architect: front-end-architecture.md]
-        D3 --> D4[User: generate UI in v0/Lovable]
-        D4 --> E
-        E --> F{Architecture suggests PRD changes?}
-        F -->|Yes| G[pm: update prd.md]
-        F -->|No| H[po: validate all artifacts]
-        G --> H
-        H --> I{PO finds issues?}
-        I -->|Yes| J[Return to relevant agent for fixes]
-        I -->|No| K[po: shard documents]
-        J --> H
-        
-        K --> L[sm: create story]
-        L --> M{Review draft story?}
-        M -->|Yes| N[analyst/pm: review & approve story]
-        M -->|No| O[dev: implement story]
-        N --> O
-        O --> P{QA review?}
-        P -->|Yes| Q[qa: review implementation]
-        P -->|No| R{More stories?}
-        Q --> S{QA found issues?}
-        S -->|Yes| T[dev: address QA feedback]
-        S -->|No| R
-        T --> Q
-        R -->|Yes| L
-        R -->|No| U{Epic retrospective?}
-        U -->|Yes| V[po: epic retrospective]
-        U -->|No| W[Project Complete]
-        V --> W
-
-        B -.-> B1[Optional: brainstorming]
-        B -.-> B2[Optional: market research]
-        D -.-> D1[Optional: user research]
-        E -.-> E1[Optional: technical research]
-
-        style W fill:#90EE90
-        style K fill:#ADD8E6
-        style L fill:#ADD8E6
-        style O fill:#ADD8E6
-        style D3 fill:#E6E6FA
-        style D4 fill:#E6E6FA
-        style B fill:#FFE4B5
-        style C fill:#FFE4B5
-        style D fill:#FFE4B5
-        style E fill:#FFE4B5
-        style N fill:#F0E68C
-        style Q fill:#F0E68C
-        style V fill:#F0E68C
-    ```
-
-  decision_guidance:
-    when_to_use:
-      - Building production frontend applications
-      - Multiple views/pages with complex interactions
-      - Need comprehensive UI/UX design and testing
-      - Multiple team members will be involved
-      - Long-term maintenance expected
-      - Customer-facing applications
-
-  handoff_prompts:
-    analyst_to_pm: "Project brief is complete. Save it as docs/project-brief.md in your project, then create the PRD."
-    pm_to_ux: "PRD is ready. Save it as docs/prd.md in your project, then create the UI/UX specification."
-    ux_to_architect: "UI/UX spec complete. Save it as docs/front-end-spec.md in your project, then create the frontend architecture."
-    architect_review: "Frontend architecture complete. Save it as docs/front-end-architecture.md. Do you suggest any changes to the PRD stories or need new stories added?"
-    architect_to_pm: "Please update the PRD with the suggested story changes, then re-export the complete prd.md to docs/."
-    updated_to_po: "All documents ready in docs/ folder. Please validate all artifacts for consistency."
-    po_issues: "PO found issues with [document]. Please return to [agent] to fix and re-save the updated document."
-    complete: "All planning artifacts validated and saved in docs/ folder. Move to IDE environment to begin development."

package/common/tasks/create-doc.md

@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
-# Create Document from Template (YAML Driven)
-
-## ⚠️ CRITICAL EXECUTION NOTICE ⚠️
-
-**THIS IS AN EXECUTABLE WORKFLOW - NOT REFERENCE MATERIAL**
-
-When this task is invoked:
-
-1. **DISABLE ALL EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATIONS** - This workflow requires full user interaction
-2. **MANDATORY STEP-BY-STEP EXECUTION** - Each section must be processed sequentially with user feedback
-3. **ELICITATION IS REQUIRED** - When `elicit: true`, you MUST use the 1-9 format and wait for user response
-4. **NO SHORTCUTS ALLOWED** - Complete documents cannot be created without following this workflow
-
-**VIOLATION INDICATOR:** If you create a complete document without user interaction, you have violated this workflow.
-
-## Critical: Template Discovery
-
-If a YAML Template has not been provided, list all templates from .bmad-core/templates or ask the user to provide another.
-
-## CRITICAL: Mandatory Elicitation Format
-
-**When `elicit: true`, this is a HARD STOP requiring user interaction:**
-
-**YOU MUST:**
-
-1. Present section content
-2. Provide detailed rationale (explain trade-offs, assumptions, decisions made)
-3. **STOP and present numbered options 1-9:**
-   - **Option 1:** Always "Proceed to next section"
-   - **Options 2-9:** Select 8 methods from data/elicitation-methods
-   - End with: "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"
-4. **WAIT FOR USER RESPONSE** - Do not proceed until user selects option or provides feedback
-
-**WORKFLOW VIOLATION:** Creating content for elicit=true sections without user interaction violates this task.
-
-**NEVER ask yes/no questions or use any other format.**
-
-## Processing Flow
-
-1. **Parse YAML template** - Load template metadata and sections
-2. **Set preferences** - Show current mode (Interactive), confirm output file
-3. **Process each section:**
-   - Skip if condition unmet
-   - Check agent permissions (owner/editors) - note if section is restricted to specific agents
-   - Draft content using section instruction
-   - Present content + detailed rationale
-   - **IF elicit: true** → MANDATORY 1-9 options format
-   - Save to file if possible
-4. **Continue until complete**
-
-## Detailed Rationale Requirements
-
-When presenting section content, ALWAYS include rationale that explains:
-
-- Trade-offs and choices made (what was chosen over alternatives and why)
-- Key assumptions made during drafting
-- Interesting or questionable decisions that need user attention
-- Areas that might need validation
-
-## Elicitation Results Flow
-
-After user selects elicitation method (2-9):
-
-1. Execute method from data/elicitation-methods
-2. Present results with insights
-3. Offer options:
-   - **1. Apply changes and update section**
-   - **2. Return to elicitation menu**
-   - **3. Ask any questions or engage further with this elicitation**
-
-## Agent Permissions
-
-When processing sections with agent permission fields:
-
-- **owner**: Note which agent role initially creates/populates the section
-- **editors**: List agent roles allowed to modify the section
-- **readonly**: Mark sections that cannot be modified after creation
-
-**For sections with restricted access:**
-
-- Include a note in the generated document indicating the responsible agent
-- Example: "_(This section is owned by dev-agent and can only be modified by dev-agent)_"
-
-## YOLO Mode
-
-User can type `#yolo` to toggle to YOLO mode (process all sections at once).
-
-## CRITICAL REMINDERS
-
-**❌ NEVER:**
-
-- Ask yes/no questions for elicitation
-- Use any format other than 1-9 numbered options
-- Create new elicitation methods
-
-**✅ ALWAYS:**
-
-- Use exact 1-9 format when elicit: true
-- Select options 2-9 from data/elicitation-methods only
-- Provide detailed rationale explaining decisions
-- End with "Select 1-9 or just type your question/feedback:"

package/common/tasks/execute-checklist.md

@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
-# Checklist Validation Task
-
-This task provides instructions for validating documentation against checklists. The agent MUST follow these instructions to ensure thorough and systematic validation of documents.
-
-## Available Checklists
-
-If the user asks or does not specify a specific checklist, list the checklists available to the agent persona. If the task is being run not with a specific agent, tell the user to check the {root}/checklists folder to select the appropriate one to run.
-
-## Instructions
-
-1. **Initial Assessment**
-   - If user or the task being run provides a checklist name:
-     - Try fuzzy matching (e.g. "architecture checklist" -> "architect-checklist")
-     - If multiple matches found, ask user to clarify
-     - Load the appropriate checklist from {root}/checklists/
-   - If no checklist specified:
-     - Ask the user which checklist they want to use
-     - Present the available options from the files in the checklists folder
-   - Confirm if they want to work through the checklist:
-     - Section by section (interactive mode - very time consuming)
-     - All at once (YOLO mode - recommended for checklists, there will be a summary of sections at the end to discuss)
-
-2. **Document and Artifact Gathering**
-   - Each checklist will specify its required documents/artifacts at the beginning
-   - Follow the checklist's specific instructions for what to gather, generally a file can be resolved in the docs folder, if not or unsure, halt and ask or confirm with the user.
-
-3. **Checklist Processing**
-
-   If in interactive mode:
-   - Work through each section of the checklist one at a time
-   - For each section:
-     - Review all items in the section following instructions for that section embedded in the checklist
-     - Check each item against the relevant documentation or artifacts as appropriate
-     - Present summary of findings for that section, highlighting warnings, errors and non applicable items (rationale for non-applicability).
-     - Get user confirmation before proceeding to next section or if any thing major do we need to halt and take corrective action
-
-   If in YOLO mode:
-   - Process all sections at once
-   - Create a comprehensive report of all findings
-   - Present the complete analysis to the user
-
-4. **Validation Approach**
-
-   For each checklist item:
-   - Read and understand the requirement
-   - Look for evidence in the documentation that satisfies the requirement
-   - Consider both explicit mentions and implicit coverage
-   - Aside from this, follow all checklist llm instructions
-   - Mark items as:
-     - ✅ PASS: Requirement clearly met
-     - ❌ FAIL: Requirement not met or insufficient coverage
-     - ⚠️ PARTIAL: Some aspects covered but needs improvement
-     - N/A: Not applicable to this case
-
-5. **Section Analysis**
-
-   For each section:
-   - think step by step to calculate pass rate
-   - Identify common themes in failed items
-   - Provide specific recommendations for improvement
-   - In interactive mode, discuss findings with user
-   - Document any user decisions or explanations
-
-6. **Final Report**
-
-   Prepare a summary that includes:
-   - Overall checklist completion status
-   - Pass rates by section
-   - List of failed items with context
-   - Specific recommendations for improvement
-   - Any sections or items marked as N/A with justification
-
-## Checklist Execution Methodology
-
-Each checklist now contains embedded LLM prompts and instructions that will:
-
-1. **Guide thorough thinking** - Prompts ensure deep analysis of each section
-2. **Request specific artifacts** - Clear instructions on what documents/access is needed
-3. **Provide contextual guidance** - Section-specific prompts for better validation
-4. **Generate comprehensive reports** - Final summary with detailed findings
-
-The LLM will:
-
-- Execute the complete checklist validation
-- Present a final report with pass/fail rates and key findings
-- Offer to provide detailed analysis of any section, especially those with warnings or failures