aios-core 2.1.0

package/.aios-core/development/workflows/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# AIOS Workflows
+
+This directory contains workflow definitions for the AIOS-FULLSTACK framework. Workflows define multi-step processes that can be executed by AIOS agents.
+
+## Available Workflows
+
+### Development Workflows
+- **brownfield-fullstack.md** - Workflow for existing full-stack projects
+- **brownfield-service.md** - Workflow for existing service/backend projects
+- **brownfield-ui.md** - Workflow for existing UI/frontend projects
+- **greenfield-fullstack.md** - Workflow for new full-stack projects
+- **greenfield-service.md** - Workflow for new service/backend projects
+- **greenfield-ui.md** - Workflow for new UI/frontend projects
+
+### Configuration Workflows
+- **setup-environment.yaml** - Configure IDE (Windsurf/Cursor/Claude Code) with AIOS development rules
+
+## Setup Environment Workflow
+
+The `setup-environment` workflow helps developers configure their IDE for optimal AIOS development experience.
+
+### Features
+- Detects installed IDEs (Windsurf, Cursor, Claude Code)
+- Backs up existing IDE configurations
+- Applies AIOS-specific development rules
+- Verifies GitHub CLI installation and authentication
+- Provides clear feedback throughout the process
+
+### Usage
+
+From the aios-master agent:
+```
+@aios-master
+*setup-environment
+```
+
+Or directly via npm:
+```bash
+npm run setup:environment
+```
+
+### What It Does
+1. **IDE Detection** - Scans for `.windsurf/`, `.cursor/`, or `.claude/` directories
+2. **GitHub CLI Check** - Ensures GitHub CLI is installed and authenticated
+3. **Backup Creation** - Saves existing rules before making changes
+4. **Rule Application** - Copies AIOS-specific rules to appropriate locations
+5. **Verification** - Confirms successful setup
+
+### IDE Rule Locations
+- **Windsurf**: `.windsurf/rules`
+- **Cursor**: `.cursorules`
+- **Claude Code**: `.claude/CLAUDE.md`
+
+### Requirements
+- Node.js 18+
+- One or more supported IDEs installed
+- GitHub CLI (recommended)
+
+## Creating New Workflows
+
+Workflows can be defined in YAML or Markdown format with YAML frontmatter. See existing workflows for examples.
+
+### Workflow Structure
+```yaml
+workflow:
+  id: unique-workflow-id
+  name: Human-readable name
+  description: What this workflow does
+  type: configuration|development|deployment
+  metadata:
+    elicit: true  # If user interaction required
+    confirmation_required: true
+  steps:
+    - id: step-1
+      name: Step name
+      description: What this step does
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+1. Keep workflows focused on a single objective
+2. Include error handling for each step
+3. Provide clear user feedback
+4. Make workflows idempotent when possible
+5. Document prerequisites and outcomes

package/.aios-core/development/workflows/brownfield-fullstack.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
+workflow:
+  id: brownfield-fullstack
+  name: Brownfield Full-Stack Enhancement
+  description: >-
+    Agent workflow for enhancing existing full-stack applications with new features,
+    modernization, or significant changes. Handles existing system analysis and safe integration.
+  type: brownfield
+  project_types:
+    - feature-addition
+    - refactoring
+    - modernization
+    - integration-enhancement
+
+  sequence:
+    - step: enhancement_classification
+      agent: analyst
+      action: classify enhancement scope
+      notes: |
+        Determine enhancement complexity to route to appropriate path:
+        - Single story (< 4 hours) → Use brownfield-create-story task
+        - Small feature (1-3 stories) → Use brownfield-create-epic task  
+        - Major enhancement (multiple epics) → Continue with full workflow
+        
+        Ask user: "Can you describe the enhancement scope? Is this a small fix, a feature addition, or a major enhancement requiring architectural changes?"
+
+    - step: routing_decision
+      condition: based_on_classification
+      routes:
+        single_story:
+          agent: pm
+          uses: brownfield-create-story
+          notes: "Create single story for immediate implementation. Exit workflow after story creation."
+        small_feature:
+          agent: pm
+          uses: brownfield-create-epic
+          notes: "Create focused epic with 1-3 stories. Exit workflow after epic creation."
+        major_enhancement:
+          continue: to_next_step
+          notes: "Continue with comprehensive planning workflow below."
+
+    - step: documentation_check
+      agent: analyst
+      action: check existing documentation
+      condition: major_enhancement_path
+      notes: |
+        Check if adequate project documentation exists:
+        - Look for existing architecture docs, API specs, coding standards
+        - Assess if documentation is current and comprehensive
+        - If adequate: Skip document-project, proceed to PRD
+        - If inadequate: Run document-project first
+
+    - step: project_analysis
+      agent: architect
+      action: analyze existing project and use task document-project
+      creates: brownfield-architecture.md (or multiple documents)
+      condition: documentation_inadequate
+      notes: "Run document-project to capture current system state, technical debt, and constraints. Pass findings to PRD creation."
+
+    - agent: pm
+      creates: prd.md
+      uses: brownfield-prd-tmpl
+      requires: existing_documentation_or_analysis
+      notes: |
+        Creates PRD for major enhancement. If document-project was run, reference its output to avoid re-analysis.
+        If skipped, use existing project documentation.
+        SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder.
+
+    - step: architecture_decision
+      agent: pm/architect
+      action: determine if architecture document needed
+      condition: after_prd_creation
+      notes: |
+        Review PRD to determine if architectural planning is needed:
+        - New architectural patterns → Create architecture doc
+        - New libraries/frameworks → Create architecture doc
+        - Platform/infrastructure changes → Create architecture doc
+        - Following existing patterns → Skip to story creation
+
+    - agent: architect
+      creates: architecture.md
+      uses: brownfield-architecture-tmpl
+      requires: prd.md
+      condition: architecture_changes_needed
+      notes: "Creates architecture ONLY for significant architectural changes. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      validates: all_artifacts
+      uses: po-master-checklist
+      notes: "Validates all documents for integration safety and completeness. May require updates to any document."
+
+    - agent: various
+      updates: any_flagged_documents
+      condition: po_checklist_issues
+      notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: shard_documents
+      creates: sharded_docs
+      requires: all_artifacts_in_project
+      notes: |
+        Shard documents for IDE development:
+        - Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
+        - Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
+        - Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
+
+    - agent: sm
+      action: create_story
+      creates: story.md
+      requires: sharded_docs_or_brownfield_docs
+      repeats: for_each_epic_or_enhancement
+      notes: |
+        Story creation cycle:
+        - For sharded PRD: @sm → *create (uses create-next-story)
+        - For brownfield docs: @sm → use create-brownfield-story task
+        - Creates story from available documentation
+        - Story starts in "Draft" status
+        - May require additional context gathering for brownfield
+
+    - agent: analyst/pm
+      action: review_draft_story
+      updates: story.md
+      requires: story.md
+      optional: true
+      condition: user_wants_story_review
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
+        - NOTE: story-review task coming soon
+        - Review story completeness and alignment
+        - Update story status: Draft → Approved
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: implement_story
+      creates: implementation_files
+      requires: story.md
+      notes: |
+        Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
+        - Implements approved story
+        - Updates File List with all changes
+        - Marks story as "Review" when complete
+
+    - agent: qa
+      action: review_implementation
+      updates: implementation_files
+      requires: implementation_files
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
+        - Senior dev review with refactoring ability
+        - Fixes small issues directly
+        - Leaves checklist for remaining items
+        - Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: address_qa_feedback
+      updates: implementation_files
+      condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
+      notes: |
+        If QA left unchecked items:
+        - Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
+        - Return to QA for final approval
+
+    - repeat_development_cycle:
+      action: continue_for_all_stories
+      notes: |
+        Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
+        Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: epic_retrospective
+      creates: epic-retrospective.md
+      condition: epic_complete
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: After epic completion
+        - NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
+        - Validate epic was completed correctly
+        - Document learnings and improvements
+
+    - workflow_end:
+      action: project_complete
+      notes: |
+        All stories implemented and reviewed!
+        Project development phase complete.
+        
+        Reference: .aios-core/data/aios-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
+
+  flow_diagram: |
+    ```mermaid
+    graph TD
+        A[Start: Brownfield Enhancement] --> B[analyst: classify enhancement scope]
+        B --> C{Enhancement Size?}
+        
+        C -->|Single Story| D[pm: brownfield-create-story]
+        C -->|1-3 Stories| E[pm: brownfield-create-epic]
+        C -->|Major Enhancement| F[analyst: check documentation]
+        
+        D --> END1[To Dev Implementation]
+        E --> END2[To Story Creation]
+        
+        F --> G{Docs Adequate?}
+        G -->|No| H[architect: document-project]
+        G -->|Yes| I[pm: brownfield PRD]
+        H --> I
+        
+        I --> J{Architecture Needed?}
+        J -->|Yes| K[architect: architecture.md]
+        J -->|No| L[po: validate artifacts]
+        K --> L
+        
+        L --> M{PO finds issues?}
+        M -->|Yes| N[Fix issues]
+        M -->|No| O[po: shard documents]
+        N --> L
+        
+        O --> P[sm: create story]
+        P --> Q{Story Type?}
+        Q -->|Sharded PRD| R[create-next-story]
+        Q -->|Brownfield Docs| S[create-brownfield-story]
+        
+        R --> T{Review draft?}
+        S --> T
+        T -->|Yes| U[review & approve]
+        T -->|No| V[dev: implement]
+        U --> V
+        
+        V --> W{QA review?}
+        W -->|Yes| X[qa: review]
+        W -->|No| Y{More stories?}
+        X --> Z{Issues?}
+        Z -->|Yes| AA[dev: fix]
+        Z -->|No| Y
+        AA --> X
+        Y -->|Yes| P
+        Y -->|No| AB{Retrospective?}
+        AB -->|Yes| AC[po: retrospective]
+        AB -->|No| AD[Complete]
+        AC --> AD
+
+        style AD fill:#90EE90
+        style END1 fill:#90EE90
+        style END2 fill:#90EE90
+        style D fill:#87CEEB
+        style E fill:#87CEEB
+        style I fill:#FFE4B5
+        style K fill:#FFE4B5
+        style O fill:#ADD8E6
+        style P fill:#ADD8E6
+        style V fill:#ADD8E6
+        style U fill:#F0E68C
+        style X fill:#F0E68C
+        style AC fill:#F0E68C
+    ```
+
+  decision_guidance:
+    when_to_use:
+      - Enhancement requires coordinated stories
+      - Architectural changes are needed
+      - Significant integration work required
+      - Risk assessment and mitigation planning necessary
+      - Multiple team members will work on related changes
+
+  handoff_prompts:
+    classification_complete: |
+      Enhancement classified as: {{enhancement_type}}
+      {{if single_story}}: Proceeding with brownfield-create-story task for immediate implementation.
+      {{if small_feature}}: Creating focused epic with brownfield-create-epic task.
+      {{if major_enhancement}}: Continuing with comprehensive planning workflow.
+    
+    documentation_assessment: |
+      Documentation assessment complete:
+      {{if adequate}}: Existing documentation is sufficient. Proceeding directly to PRD creation.
+      {{if inadequate}}: Running document-project to capture current system state before PRD.
+    
+    document_project_to_pm: |
+      Project analysis complete. Key findings documented in:
+      - {{document_list}}
+      Use these findings to inform PRD creation and avoid re-analyzing the same aspects.
+    
+    pm_to_architect_decision: |
+      PRD complete and saved as docs/prd.md. 
+      Architectural changes identified: {{yes/no}}
+      {{if yes}}: Proceeding to create architecture document for: {{specific_changes}}
+      {{if no}}: No architectural changes needed. Proceeding to validation.
+    
+    architect_to_po: "Architecture complete. Save it as docs/architecture.md. Please validate all artifacts for integration safety."
+    
+    po_to_sm: |
+      All artifacts validated. 
+      Documentation type available: {{sharded_prd / brownfield_docs}}
+      {{if sharded}}: Use standard create-next-story task.
+      {{if brownfield}}: Use create-brownfield-story task to handle varied documentation formats.
+    
+    sm_story_creation: |
+      Creating story from {{documentation_type}}.
+      {{if missing_context}}: May need to gather additional context from user during story creation.
+    
+    complete: "All planning artifacts validated and development can begin. Stories will be created based on available documentation format."

package/.aios-core/development/workflows/brownfield-service.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+workflow:
+  id: brownfield-service
+  name: Brownfield Service/API Enhancement
+  description: >-
+    Agent workflow for enhancing existing backend services and APIs with new features,
+    modernization, or performance improvements. Handles existing system analysis and safe integration.
+  type: brownfield
+  project_types:
+    - service-modernization
+    - api-enhancement
+    - microservice-extraction
+    - performance-optimization
+    - integration-enhancement
+
+  sequence:
+    - step: service_analysis
+      agent: architect
+      action: analyze existing project and use task document-project
+      creates: multiple documents per the document-project template
+      notes: "Review existing service documentation, codebase, performance metrics, and identify integration dependencies."
+
+    - agent: pm
+      creates: prd.md
+      uses: brownfield-prd-tmpl
+      requires: existing_service_analysis
+      notes: "Creates comprehensive PRD focused on service enhancement with existing system analysis. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final prd.md to your project's docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: architect
+      creates: architecture.md
+      uses: brownfield-architecture-tmpl
+      requires: prd.md
+      notes: "Creates architecture with service integration strategy and API evolution planning. SAVE OUTPUT: Copy final architecture.md to your project's docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      validates: all_artifacts
+      uses: po-master-checklist
+      notes: "Validates all documents for service integration safety and API compatibility. May require updates to any document."
+
+    - agent: various
+      updates: any_flagged_documents
+      condition: po_checklist_issues
+      notes: "If PO finds issues, return to relevant agent to fix and re-export updated documents to docs/ folder."
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: shard_documents
+      creates: sharded_docs
+      requires: all_artifacts_in_project
+      notes: |
+        Shard documents for IDE development:
+        - Option A: Use PO agent to shard: @po then ask to shard docs/prd.md
+        - Option B: Manual: Drag shard-doc task + docs/prd.md into chat
+        - Creates docs/prd/ and docs/architecture/ folders with sharded content
+
+    - agent: sm
+      action: create_story
+      creates: story.md
+      requires: sharded_docs
+      repeats: for_each_epic
+      notes: |
+        Story creation cycle:
+        - SM Agent (New Chat): @sm → *create
+        - Creates next story from sharded docs
+        - Story starts in "Draft" status
+
+    - agent: analyst/pm
+      action: review_draft_story
+      updates: story.md
+      requires: story.md
+      optional: true
+      condition: user_wants_story_review
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: Review and approve draft story
+        - NOTE: story-review task coming soon
+        - Review story completeness and alignment
+        - Update story status: Draft → Approved
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: implement_story
+      creates: implementation_files
+      requires: story.md
+      notes: |
+        Dev Agent (New Chat): @dev
+        - Implements approved story
+        - Updates File List with all changes
+        - Marks story as "Review" when complete
+
+    - agent: qa
+      action: review_implementation
+      updates: implementation_files
+      requires: implementation_files
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: QA Agent (New Chat): @qa → review-story
+        - Senior dev review with refactoring ability
+        - Fixes small issues directly
+        - Leaves checklist for remaining items
+        - Updates story status (Review → Done or stays Review)
+
+    - agent: dev
+      action: address_qa_feedback
+      updates: implementation_files
+      condition: qa_left_unchecked_items
+      notes: |
+        If QA left unchecked items:
+        - Dev Agent (New Chat): Address remaining items
+        - Return to QA for final approval
+
+    - repeat_development_cycle:
+      action: continue_for_all_stories
+      notes: |
+        Repeat story cycle (SM → Dev → QA) for all epic stories
+        Continue until all stories in PRD are complete
+
+    - agent: po
+      action: epic_retrospective
+      creates: epic-retrospective.md
+      condition: epic_complete
+      optional: true
+      notes: |
+        OPTIONAL: After epic completion
+        - NOTE: epic-retrospective task coming soon
+        - Validate epic was completed correctly
+        - Document learnings and improvements
+
+    - workflow_end:
+      action: project_complete
+      notes: |
+        All stories implemented and reviewed!
+        Project development phase complete.
+        
+        Reference: .aios-core/data/aios-kb.md#IDE Development Workflow
+
+  flow_diagram: |
+    ```mermaid
+    graph TD
+        A[Start: Service Enhancement] --> B[analyst: analyze existing service]
+        B --> C[pm: prd.md]
+        C --> D[architect: architecture.md]
+        D --> E[po: validate with po-master-checklist]
+        E --> F{PO finds issues?}
+        F -->|Yes| G[Return to relevant agent for fixes]
+        F -->|No| H[po: shard documents]
+        G --> E
+        
+        H --> I[sm: create story]
+        I --> J{Review draft story?}
+        J -->|Yes| K[analyst/pm: review & approve story]
+        J -->|No| L[dev: implement story]
+        K --> L
+        L --> M{QA review?}
+        M -->|Yes| N[qa: review implementation]
+        M -->|No| O{More stories?}
+        N --> P{QA found issues?}
+        P -->|Yes| Q[dev: address QA feedback]
+        P -->|No| O
+        Q --> N
+        O -->|Yes| I
+        O -->|No| R{Epic retrospective?}
+        R -->|Yes| S[po: epic retrospective]
+        R -->|No| T[Project Complete]
+        S --> T
+
+        style T fill:#90EE90
+        style H fill:#ADD8E6
+        style I fill:#ADD8E6
+        style L fill:#ADD8E6
+        style C fill:#FFE4B5
+        style D fill:#FFE4B5
+        style K fill:#F0E68C
+        style N fill:#F0E68C
+        style S fill:#F0E68C
+    ```
+
+  decision_guidance:
+    when_to_use:
+      - Service enhancement requires coordinated stories
+      - API versioning or breaking changes needed
+      - Database schema changes required
+      - Performance or scalability improvements needed
+      - Multiple integration points affected
+
+  handoff_prompts:
+    analyst_to_pm: "Service analysis complete. Create comprehensive PRD with service integration strategy."
+    pm_to_architect: "PRD ready. Save it as docs/prd.md, then create the service architecture."
+    architect_to_po: "Architecture complete. Save it as docs/architecture.md. Please validate all artifacts for service integration safety."
+    po_issues: "PO found issues with [document]. Please return to [agent] to fix and re-save the updated document."
+    complete: "All planning artifacts validated and saved in docs/ folder. Move to IDE environment to begin development."