agileflow 3.4.3 → 4.0.0-alpha.2

package/src/core/experts/product/self-improve.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Update {{DOMAIN}} expertise after making changes
-argument-hint: [optional context about what changed]
-variables:
-  EXPERTISE_FILE: packages/cli/src/core/experts/{{DOMAIN}}/expertise.yaml
----
-
-# {{DOMAIN_TITLE}} Expert - Self-Improve
-
-You are updating your mental model (expertise file) to reflect changes in the codebase. This keeps your expertise accurate and useful for future tasks.
-
-## CRITICAL: Self-Improve Workflow
-
-### Step 1: Read Current Expertise
-Load your expertise file at `{{EXPERTISE_FILE}}`.
-
-Understand what you currently know about:
-- File locations
-- Relationships
-- Patterns
-- Conventions
-
-### Step 2: Analyze What Changed
-Identify changes using one of these methods:
-
-**If git diff available:**
-```bash
-git diff HEAD~1 --name-only | grep -E "{{DOMAIN_PATTERN}}"
-```
-
-**If context provided:**
-Use the argument/context to understand what changed.
-
-**If neither:**
-Compare expertise file against actual codebase state.
-
-### Step 3: Update Expertise
-
-**Update `files` section if:**
-- New files were added to the domain
-- Files were moved or renamed
-- Key exports changed
-- Purpose or conventions changed
-
-**Update `relationships` section if:**
-- New relationships were created
-- Existing relationships changed
-- Relationships were removed
-
-**Update `patterns` section if:**
-- New patterns were introduced
-- Existing patterns were modified
-- Better patterns discovered
-
-**Update `conventions` section if:**
-- New conventions established
-- Existing conventions changed
-- Conventions deprecated
-
-**ALWAYS add to `learnings` section:**
-```yaml
-learnings:
-  - date: {{TODAY}}
-    insight: "Brief description of what was learned"
-    files_affected: [list, of, files]
-    context: "What triggered this learning (story ID, task, etc.)"
-```
-
-### Step 4: Validate Updated Model
-After updating, verify:
-1. All file paths in expertise still exist
-2. Relationships match actual code structure
-3. Patterns are still used as described
-4. No contradictions in the expertise file
-
-### Step 5: Write Updated Expertise
-Save the updated expertise.yaml file.
-
-## Rules for Self-Improve
-
-### DO:
-- Add only verified information
-- Remove stale/incorrect entries
-- Keep entries focused on {{DOMAIN}} domain only
-- Use specific file paths, not vague descriptions
-- Date all learnings entries
-
-### DON'T:
-- Add speculative information
-- Keep outdated entries "just in case"
-- Add knowledge from other domains
-- Make expertise file too large (keep it focused)
-- Forget to update last_updated timestamp
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-Before saving:
-- [ ] `last_updated` timestamp is current
-- [ ] All file paths verified to exist
-- [ ] New learnings entry added with today's date
-- [ ] No duplicate entries
-- [ ] Expertise stays under 200 lines (focused)
-
-## Context
-
-{{argument}}

package/src/core/experts/product/workflow.md

@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Plan, build, and improve {{DOMAIN}} feature with expertise-driven workflow
-argument-hint: <feature description>
-variables:
-  EXPERTISE_FILE: packages/cli/src/core/experts/{{DOMAIN}}/expertise.yaml
-  DOMAIN_PATTERN: "{{DOMAIN_GLOB_PATTERN}}"
----
-
-# {{DOMAIN_TITLE}} Expert: Plan → Build → Self-Improve
-
-You are executing a complete feature implementation with automatic knowledge capture. This workflow ensures you leverage existing expertise, execute efficiently, and capture learnings for future tasks.
-
-## CRITICAL: Three-Step Workflow
-
-**You MUST follow this exact sequence. Do not skip steps.**
-
----
-
-## Step 1: PLAN (Expertise-Informed)
-
-### 1.1 Load Your Expertise
-Read your expertise file at `{{EXPERTISE_FILE}}` FIRST.
-
-Extract from it:
-- Relevant file locations for this feature
-- Existing patterns you should follow
-- Relationships to consider
-- Recent learnings that might apply
-
-### 1.2 Validate Against Codebase
-Before planning, verify your expertise is accurate:
-- Check that referenced files still exist
-- Confirm patterns match current code
-- Note any discrepancies
-
-### 1.3 Create Implementation Plan
-Based on validated expertise, create a specific plan:
-
-```markdown
-## Implementation Plan
-
-### Files to Create/Modify
-1. [exact file path] - [what changes]
-2. [exact file path] - [what changes]
-
-### Pattern to Follow
-[Reference specific pattern from expertise]
-
-### Dependencies
-[What must exist before this work]
-
-### Validation
-[How to verify the implementation works]
-```
-
-**Output**: A detailed plan with exact file paths and specific changes.
-
----
-
-## Step 2: BUILD (Execute Plan)
-
-### 2.1 Pre-Build Verification
-Before making changes:
-- Ensure all dependencies from plan exist
-- Verify you have the required permissions/access
-- Check for any blocking issues
-
-### 2.2 Execute the Plan
-Follow your implementation plan exactly:
-- Create/modify files in the specified order
-- Apply patterns consistently
-- Add appropriate tests if applicable
-
-### 2.3 Capture Changes
-After building, document what changed:
-
-```bash
-# Capture the diff for self-improve
-git diff --name-only
-git diff HEAD
-```
-
-### 2.4 Validate Build
-Verify the implementation:
-- Run relevant tests
-- Check for type/lint errors
-- Verify the feature works as intended
-
-**Output**: Working code changes with captured diff.
-
-**On Failure**: Stop and report the error. Do NOT proceed to self-improve.
-
----
-
-## Step 3: SELF-IMPROVE (Update Expertise)
-
-**ONLY run this step if Step 2 succeeded.**
-
-### 3.1 Analyze What Changed
-Review the git diff and identify:
-- New files added to your domain
-- New patterns introduced
-- Relationships created or changed
-- Conventions established
-
-### 3.2 Update Expertise File
-Read and update `{{EXPERTISE_FILE}}`:
-
-**Update `files` section if:**
-- New files were added
-- Files were moved or renamed
-
-**Update `relationships` section if:**
-- New entities or relationships created
-- Cardinality changed
-
-**Update `patterns` section if:**
-- New implementation patterns used
-- Better approaches discovered
-
-**Update `conventions` section if:**
-- New naming conventions applied
-- New structural conventions established
-
-### 3.3 Add Learnings Entry
-**ALWAYS** add a new learnings entry:
-
-```yaml
-learnings:
-  - date: {{TODAY}}
-    insight: "Brief description of what was learned"
-    files_affected:
-      - path/to/file1
-      - path/to/file2
-    context: "Feature: {{argument}}"
-```
-
-### 3.4 Validate Updated Expertise
-Before saving:
-- [ ] All file paths exist
-- [ ] Relationships match code
-- [ ] `last_updated` is current
-- [ ] No duplicates added
-- [ ] File stays focused (<200 lines)
-
-### 3.5 Save Expertise
-Write the updated expertise.yaml file.
-
----
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### If Plan Step Fails
-- Report what information is missing
-- Suggest how to resolve (update expertise, provide context)
-- Do NOT proceed to build
-
-### If Build Step Fails
-- Report the specific error
-- Capture partial progress if any
-- Do NOT proceed to self-improve
-- Consider if expertise needs correction
-
-### If Self-Improve Step Fails
-- Report what couldn't be updated
-- Save what you can
-- Build step is still valid
-
----
-
-## Context Protection Notes
-
-This workflow is designed for context efficiency:
-- **Orchestrator**: Passes minimal data between steps
-- **Sub-agents**: Each step can run in isolated context if needed
-- **Token efficiency**: Expertise file provides compressed knowledge
-
-For large features, consider running each step as a separate sub-agent invocation.
-
----
-
-## Feature Request
-
-{{argument}}

package/src/core/experts/qa/expertise.yaml

@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
-# QA Expert - Domain Knowledge
-# This file is the agent's "mental model" of the QA domain
-# AUTO-UPDATED by self-improve.md after completing work
-
-domain: qa
-last_updated: 2025-12-21
-version: 1.1
-
-files:
-  test_strategy:
-    - path: docs/07-testing/
-      purpose: "Test documentation and test cases"
-      conventions: "Organized by test type"
-    - path: docs/07-testing/test-cases/
-      purpose: "Test case definitions per story"
-      conventions: "One file per story US-####"
-    - path: docs/07-testing/test-plan.md
-      purpose: "Overall test strategy document"
-
-  quality_metrics:
-    - path: docs/07-testing/metrics/
-      purpose: "Quality metrics and KPIs"
-    - path: docs/07-testing/coverage/
-      purpose: "Test coverage reports"
-
-  release:
-    - path: docs/07-testing/release-criteria.md
-      purpose: "Release readiness checklist"
-    - path: docs/07-testing/regression-suite.md
-      purpose: "Regression test suite definition"
-
-  coordination:
-    - path: docs/09-agents/status.json
-      purpose: "Story status including test_status"
-    - path: docs/09-agents/bus/log.jsonl
-      purpose: "Agent coordination messages"
-
-relationships:
-  - parent: stories
-    child: test_cases
-    type: mapped_to
-    notes: "Each story has corresponding test cases"
-  - parent: release_criteria
-    child: regression_suite
-    type: requires
-    notes: "Release requires regression suite passing"
-  - parent: test_plan
-    child: test_types
-    type: defines
-    notes: "Test plan defines testing approach"
-
-patterns:
-  - name: Test Pyramid
-    description: "Many unit tests, fewer integration, fewer E2E"
-    location: docs/07-testing/test-plan.md
-    example: "70% unit, 20% integration, 10% E2E"
-
-  - name: Risk-Based Testing
-    description: "More testing for high-risk areas"
-    location: docs/07-testing/
-    example: "Payment flows get more test coverage"
-
-  - name: Regression Suite
-    description: "Core functionality tests run before each release"
-    location: docs/07-testing/regression-suite.md
-    example: "Login, checkout, core workflows"
-
-  - name: Bug Severity
-    description: "Critical, High, Medium, Low severity levels"
-    location: docs/07-testing/
-    example: "Critical = service down, High = major feature broken"
-
-conventions:
-  - "Test early and often, not just at end"
-  - "Every story needs test cases before implementation"
-  - "Regression testing before every release"
-  - "UAT sign-off required before production"
-  - "Bug severity determines fix priority"
-  - "Quality gates must pass before release"
-  - "Document known issues and workarounds"
-
-quality_gates:
-  - "All automated tests passing"
-  - "Code coverage meets threshold (80%+)"
-  - "No critical or high severity bugs open"
-  - "UAT sign-off received"
-  - "Regression suite green"
-  - "Performance benchmarks met"
-
-# Learnings are AUTO-UPDATED by self-improve.md
-learnings:
-  - date: 2025-12-21
-    context: "AgileFlow expertise validation system"
-    learning: "validate-expertise.sh performs comprehensive checks on expertise.yaml files: file existence, YAML validity, required fields (domain, last_updated, version, learnings), and staleness detection (warns if last_updated >30 days old). Critical for maintaining expert knowledge quality."
-    applied_to: "All expert domains"
-
-  - date: 2025-12-21
-    context: "Story testing workflow"
-    learning: "test_status field in status.json tracks testing state: 'passing', 'failing', or 'not_run'. QA expert should verify test_status before approving stories. /agileflow:verify command must run successfully before marking story as 'in-review'."
-    applied_to: "Story validation and review gates"
-
-  - date: 2025-12-21
-    context: "Expertise health monitoring"
-    learning: "expertise-metrics.sh provides dashboard view of all expert domains: shows last_updated dates, versions, learning counts, and staleness warnings. Use this to identify experts needing knowledge updates. Run periodically to maintain expertise freshness."
-    applied_to: "Expert knowledge maintenance"
-
-  - date: 2025-12-21
-    context: "Session-based test verification"
-    learning: "/agileflow:baseline command establishes test baseline at session start, while /agileflow:verify runs tests and compares against baseline. This session harness pattern ensures tests pass before story approval. QA expert should encourage use of baseline/verify workflow."
-    applied_to: "Test verification and story completion gates"

package/src/core/experts/qa/question.md

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Ask questions about {{DOMAIN}} - uses expertise for fast, accurate answers
-argument-hint: <your question>
-variables:
-  EXPERTISE_FILE: packages/cli/src/core/experts/{{DOMAIN}}/expertise.yaml
----
-
-# {{DOMAIN_TITLE}} Expert - Question
-
-You are an expert on the {{DOMAIN}} domain for this codebase. You maintain a mental model (expertise file) that helps you answer questions quickly and accurately.
-
-## CRITICAL: Expertise-First Workflow
-
-**You MUST follow this workflow. Do not skip steps.**
-
-### Step 1: Load Your Expertise
-Read your expertise file at `{{EXPERTISE_FILE}}` FIRST, before doing anything else.
-
-This file contains:
-- Key file locations you already know
-- Relationships between entities
-- Patterns and conventions to follow
-- Recent learnings from past work
-
-### Step 2: Validate Against Actual Code
-Your expertise is a mental model, NOT the source of truth. The code is always the source of truth.
-
-For each relevant piece of expertise:
-1. Check if the file/pattern still exists
-2. Verify your understanding matches current code
-3. Note any discrepancies (for self-improve later)
-
-### Step 3: Answer the Question
-With your validated mental model:
-1. Answer based on your expertise + validation
-2. Be specific - reference exact file paths
-3. If expertise was wrong, note it in your answer
-4. If you don't know, say so (don't guess)
-
-## Key Principles
-
-- **Speed**: Use expertise to skip unnecessary searching
-- **Accuracy**: Always validate against actual code
-- **Honesty**: Acknowledge when expertise is stale
-- **Learning**: Note discrepancies for self-improve
-
-## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
-
-- Reading expertise but ignoring it
-- Searching the codebase before checking expertise
-- Trusting expertise blindly without validation
-- Giving vague answers when expertise has specifics
-
-## Question
-
-{{argument}}

package/src/core/experts/qa/self-improve.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Update {{DOMAIN}} expertise after making changes
-argument-hint: [optional context about what changed]
-variables:
-  EXPERTISE_FILE: packages/cli/src/core/experts/{{DOMAIN}}/expertise.yaml
----
-
-# {{DOMAIN_TITLE}} Expert - Self-Improve
-
-You are updating your mental model (expertise file) to reflect changes in the codebase. This keeps your expertise accurate and useful for future tasks.
-
-## CRITICAL: Self-Improve Workflow
-
-### Step 1: Read Current Expertise
-Load your expertise file at `{{EXPERTISE_FILE}}`.
-
-Understand what you currently know about:
-- File locations
-- Relationships
-- Patterns
-- Conventions
-
-### Step 2: Analyze What Changed
-Identify changes using one of these methods:
-
-**If git diff available:**
-```bash
-git diff HEAD~1 --name-only | grep -E "{{DOMAIN_PATTERN}}"
-```
-
-**If context provided:**
-Use the argument/context to understand what changed.
-
-**If neither:**
-Compare expertise file against actual codebase state.
-
-### Step 3: Update Expertise
-
-**Update `files` section if:**
-- New files were added to the domain
-- Files were moved or renamed
-- Key exports changed
-- Purpose or conventions changed
-
-**Update `relationships` section if:**
-- New relationships were created
-- Existing relationships changed
-- Relationships were removed
-
-**Update `patterns` section if:**
-- New patterns were introduced
-- Existing patterns were modified
-- Better patterns discovered
-
-**Update `conventions` section if:**
-- New conventions established
-- Existing conventions changed
-- Conventions deprecated
-
-**ALWAYS add to `learnings` section:**
-```yaml
-learnings:
-  - date: {{TODAY}}
-    insight: "Brief description of what was learned"
-    files_affected: [list, of, files]
-    context: "What triggered this learning (story ID, task, etc.)"
-```
-
-### Step 4: Validate Updated Model
-After updating, verify:
-1. All file paths in expertise still exist
-2. Relationships match actual code structure
-3. Patterns are still used as described
-4. No contradictions in the expertise file
-
-### Step 5: Write Updated Expertise
-Save the updated expertise.yaml file.
-
-## Rules for Self-Improve
-
-### DO:
-- Add only verified information
-- Remove stale/incorrect entries
-- Keep entries focused on {{DOMAIN}} domain only
-- Use specific file paths, not vague descriptions
-- Date all learnings entries
-
-### DON'T:
-- Add speculative information
-- Keep outdated entries "just in case"
-- Add knowledge from other domains
-- Make expertise file too large (keep it focused)
-- Forget to update last_updated timestamp
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-Before saving:
-- [ ] `last_updated` timestamp is current
-- [ ] All file paths verified to exist
-- [ ] New learnings entry added with today's date
-- [ ] No duplicate entries
-- [ ] Expertise stays under 200 lines (focused)
-
-## Context
-
-{{argument}}