agent-threat-rules 3.1.1 → 3.3.0

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00503-fake-error-state-takeover-unrestricted-replacement-bot.yaml

@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Fake Error State Takeover - Unrestricted Replacement Bot) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Fake Error State Takeover - Unrestricted Replacement Bot)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -59,6 +65,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Fake Error State Takeover - Unrestricted Replacement Bot)."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00506-nevermind-override-goal-hijacking-in-user-input-promptinject.yaml

@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Nevermind-Override Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -56,6 +59,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Nevermind-Override Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -63,6 +69,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Nevermind-Override Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00507-screaming-stop-goal-hijacking-in-user-input-promptinject.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Screaming-Stop Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Screaming-Stop Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -62,6 +68,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Screaming-Stop Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00508-escape-delimiter-wrapped-goal-hijacking-in-user-input-prompt.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Escape-Delimiter Wrapped Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Escape-Delimiter Wrapped Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -62,6 +68,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Escape-Delimiter Wrapped Goal Hijacking in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00509-prompt-leaking-via-ignore-previous-instructions-in-user-inpu.yaml

@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Prompt Leaking via Ignore-Previous-Instructions in User Input (PromptInject)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -56,6 +59,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Prompt Leaking via Ignore-Previous-Instructions in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -63,6 +69,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Prompt Leaking via Ignore-Previous-Instructions in User Input (PromptInject))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00510-delayed-tool-invocation-injection.yaml

@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Delayed Tool Invocation via Prompt Injection (Time-Shifted Execution)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -53,6 +56,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Delayed Tool Invocation via Prompt Injection (Time-Shifted Execution))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -60,6 +66,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Delayed Tool Invocation via Prompt Injection (Time-Shifted Execution))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00511-mcp-web-context-poisoning.yaml

@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (MCP Web-Fetch Context Poisoning via Embedded Agent Instructions) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -51,6 +54,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (MCP Web-Fetch Context Poisoning via Embedded Agent Instructions)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -58,6 +64,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (MCP Web-Fetch Context Poisoning via Embedded Agent Instructions)."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00512-rules-file-backdoor-injection.yaml

@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Rules-File Backdoor — Supply Chain Attack on AI Coding Assistant Configuration) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Rules-File Backdoor — Supply Chain Attack on AI Coding Assistant Configuration)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -59,6 +65,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Rules-File Backdoor — Supply Chain Attack on AI Coding Assistant Configuration)."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00515-hidden-text-prompt-injection.yaml

@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden-Text Prompt Injection in User-Supplied Documents) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -53,6 +56,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden-Text Prompt Injection in User-Supplied Documents)."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -60,6 +66,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden-Text Prompt Injection in User-Supplied Documents)."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00518-ignore-previous-and-following-instructions-output-command-promptinject.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Ignore-Previous-and-Following Instructions Output Command (PromptInject Goal Hijacking)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Ignore-Previous-and-Following Instructions Output Command (PromptInject Goal Hijacking))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -62,6 +68,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Ignore-Previous-and-Following Instructions Output Command (PromptInject Goal Hijacking))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00519-tautology-logic-noise-injection-promptbench.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Tautology Logic Noise Injection (PromptBench Stresstest)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Tautology Logic Noise Injection (PromptBench Stresstest))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -62,6 +68,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Tautology Logic Noise Injection (PromptBench Stresstest))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00520-nlp-task-random-token-suffix-injection-promptbench.yaml

@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Prompt injection is a documented risk class; this rule implements the monitoring control required by Article 9 risk management obligations for high-risk AI systems."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (NLP Task Random Token Suffix Injection (PromptBench Checklist)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "Identifying prompt injection as an AI risk to be catalogued in the organizational risk register."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (NLP Task Random Token Suffix Injection (PromptBench Checklist))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Addressing prompt injection risk is an objective required under clause 6.2 AIMS information security planning; this rule operationalizes the detection control measure."
@@ -65,6 +71,9 @@ compliance:
     - clause: "8.4"
       context: "Impact assessment for AI deployments under clause 8.4 must account for prompt injection inputs; detection events from this rule provide the required monitoring evidence."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (NLP Task Random Token Suffix Injection (PromptBench Checklist))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00535-windsurf-ide-zero-click-prompt-injection.yaml

@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Article 9 risk management for high-risk AI systems must include indirect prompt injection from developer-opened files as a primary threat vector."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Windsurf IDE Zero-Click Prompt Injection via Embedded File Directives (CVE-2026-30615)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Manage
       subcategory: MG.2.3
@@ -58,10 +61,16 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: MP.5.1
       context: "File-embedded indirect prompt injection must be catalogued as a tracked threat in the organizational AI risk register for any IDE deploying an LLM assistant."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Windsurf IDE Zero-Click Prompt Injection via Embedded File Directives (CVE-2026-30615))."
+      strength: primary
   iso_42001:
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Zero-click indirect prompt injection via developer-opened files requires a detection control operationalised at the model-input layer under clause 6.2 AIMS planning."
       strength: primary
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Windsurf IDE Zero-Click Prompt Injection via Embedded File Directives (CVE-2026-30615))."
+      strength: primary
 
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00550-untrusted-retrieval-to-privileged-tool.yaml

@@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ compliance:
         into privileged tool calls is the canonical agentic attack chain
         under Article 15.
       strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail))."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MS.2.6"
       context: >
@@ -64,7 +70,20 @@ compliance:
         in agent traces are integrity violations requiring detection per
         MS-2.6.
       strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail))."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail)) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
 
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail))."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Privileged tool call following untrusted retrieval (indirect prompt injection trail)) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: indirect-injection-trace-shape

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00554-langchain-vulnerable-to-template-injecti.yaml

@@ -24,10 +24,41 @@ references:
   - https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/commit/fa7789d6c21222b85211755d822ef698d3b34e00
   - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65106
   - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6qv9-48xg-fc7f
+  owasp_llm:
+    - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 metadata_provenance:
   ghsa: ghsa-sync
   cve: ghsa-sync
   cwe: ghsa-sync
+compliance:
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
+  nist_ai_rmf:
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates)."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (LangChain Vulnerable to Template Injection via Attribute Access in Prompt Templates) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   scan_target: runtime

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00565-the-llm-cli-tool-thru-0-27-1-contains-a-.yaml

@@ -19,9 +19,40 @@ references:
   external:
   - https://github.com/simonw/llm
   - https://www.notion.so/CVE-2026-31236-35d1e139318881a4a0f1fffcf671f7e3
+  owasp_llm:
+    - LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection
+  owasp_agentic:
+    - ASI01:2026 - Agent Goal Hijack
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 metadata_provenance:
   cve: nvd-sync
   cwe: nvd-sync
+compliance:
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
+  nist_ai_rmf:
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line)."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (The llm CLI tool thru 0.27.1 contains a critical code injection vulnerability via its --functions command-line) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: skill-compromise
   subcategory: nvd-imported

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00573-semantic-paraphrased-injection.yaml

@@ -32,6 +32,30 @@ compliance:
       context: "Paraphrased instruction-override is a documented evasion of literal-keyword prompt-injection filters; the semantic judge closes the recall gap left by pattern rules."
       strength: primary
 
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic))."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic)) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  nist_ai_rmf:
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic))."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic)) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic))."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic))."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Paraphrased Prompt Injection (Semantic)) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: paraphrased

package/rules/skill-compromise/ATR-2026-00060-skill-impersonation.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ compliance:
     - article: "9"
       context: "Supply chain compromise via malicious skill registries is a documented risk requiring monitoring controls under Article 9; skill-name pattern detection is the runtime enforcement of those controls."
       strength: secondary
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the skill supply-chain compromise (MCP Skill Impersonation and Supply Chain Attack)."
+      strength: primary
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - function: Map
       subcategory: MP.2.3
@@ -55,13 +58,25 @@ compliance:
       subcategory: GV.1.2
       context: "GV.1.2 accountability roles must include responsibility for validating third-party tool integrity; this rule provides the automated signal needed to fulfill that governance obligation."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the skill supply-chain compromise (MCP Skill Impersonation and Supply Chain Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.3.1"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 3.1 (third-party resources regularly monitored) is supported where this rule detects the skill supply-chain compromise (MCP Skill Impersonation and Supply Chain Attack)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MG.3.2"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 3.2 (pre-trained models monitored as part of maintenance) is supported where this rule detects the skill supply-chain compromise (MCP Skill Impersonation and Supply Chain Attack)."
+      strength: secondary
   iso_42001:
-    - clause: "8.5"
-      context: "MCP skills are externally-provided AI-related components under clause 8.5; this rule enforces controls over externally-provided tools by detecting impersonation before invocation."
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "MCP skills are externally-provided AI-related components under clause 8.1; this rule enforces controls over externally-provided tools by detecting impersonation before invocation."
       strength: primary
     - clause: "6.2"
       context: "Clause 6.2 AIMS security planning requires controls for third-party component integrity; skill impersonation detection operationalizes that planning objective at runtime."
       strength: secondary
+    - clause: "8.3"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.3 (AI risk treatment) is supported by this rule, which implements runtime detection of the skill supply-chain compromise (MCP Skill Impersonation and Supply Chain Attack) as a treatment control."
+      strength: secondary
 
 tags:
   category: skill-compromise

package/rules/skill-compromise/ATR-2026-00061-description-behavior-mismatch.yaml

@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
       context: "Runtime divergence between declared scope (e.g., read-only) and observed actions (writes, network access) is a security/resilience signal; MS.2.7 requires continuous evaluation of AI system security posture, which this detection feeds with concrete supply-chain integrity findings."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MG.3.1"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 3.1 (third-party resources regularly monitored) is supported where this rule detects the skill supply-chain compromise (Skill Description-Behavior Mismatch)."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the skill supply-chain compromise (Skill Description-Behavior Mismatch)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "8.3"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.3 (AI risk treatment) is supported by this rule, which implements runtime detection of the skill supply-chain compromise (Skill Description-Behavior Mismatch) as a treatment control."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the skill supply-chain compromise (Skill Description-Behavior Mismatch)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the skill supply-chain compromise (Skill Description-Behavior Mismatch)."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: tool-poisoning
   subcategory: description-mismatch