agent-threat-rules 3.1.1 → 3.3.0

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00163-skill-hidden-override-instruction.yaml

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ references:
     - 'LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection'
   owasp_agentic:
     - 'ASI01:2026 - Agent Behaviour Hijack'
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 compliance:
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
@@ -29,6 +31,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of unconditional approval and confirmation-suppression instructions triggers the disengage/deactivate response paths required by MG.2.3 to prevent the agent from executing under hijacked safety controls."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden Override Instructions in Skill Content)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden Override Instructions in Skill Content) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden Override Instructions in Skill Content)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden Override Instructions in Skill Content)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden Override Instructions in Skill Content) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: skill-hidden-override

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00202-encoding-evasion-homoglyph-synonym.yaml

@@ -33,6 +33,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.4.2"
       context: "Field-tested evasion patterns derived from skill-sanitizer v2.1 represent measurable continuous improvement of detection coverage; MG.4.2 requires that detection rulesets evolve as new bypass techniques emerge in production."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Encoding Evasion via Homoglyphs and Synonym Substitution) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: encoding-evasion

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00203-context-pollution-skill-description.yaml

@@ -36,6 +36,29 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.3.2"
       context: "Detection of polluted skill descriptions feeds the monitoring of pre-trained and third-party model components used in development; MG.3.2 requires ongoing monitoring of these supply-chain artifacts for malicious content before they are integrated into agent workflows."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions)."
+      strength: primary
+    - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.3 (respond to previously unknown identified risks) is supported by this rule, which surfaces the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions) so the risk can be treated."
+      strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Context Pollution in Skill Descriptions) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: context-pollution

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00206-hidden-priority-instructions.yaml

@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ references:
     - "LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection"
   owasp_agentic:
     - "ASI01:2026 - Agent Behaviour Hijack"
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 compliance:
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
@@ -27,6 +29,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches against hidden priority-block instructions trigger risk treatment workflows to quarantine or disable the offending skill before the agent executes the overriding commands; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/deactivate mechanisms be in place."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Priority Override Blocks)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Priority Override Blocks) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Priority Override Blocks)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Priority Override Blocks)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Priority Override Blocks) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: hidden-priority-instructions

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00207-hidden-instructions.yaml

@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ references:
     - "LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection"
   owasp_agentic:
     - "ASI01:2026 - Agent Behaviour Hijack"
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 compliance:
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
@@ -26,6 +28,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Directive language attempting to bypass security controls must trigger pre-defined risk treatment such as quarantining or disabling the offending skill before it can hijack agent behavior, which is the deactivation mechanism MG.2.3 mandates."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Hidden System Instructions with Permission Override) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: hidden-instructions

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00211-system-prompt-override.yaml

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ references:
     - "LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection"
   owasp_agentic:
     - "ASI01:2026 - Agent Behaviour Hijack"
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 compliance:
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
@@ -28,6 +30,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches on translation-borne override instructions trigger pre-defined risk treatment to disengage or quarantine the hijacked agent behavior before safety controls are bypassed, satisfying MG.2.3's requirement for mechanisms to supersede or deactivate compromised AI behavior."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override via Translation Context Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override via Translation Context Injection) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override via Translation Context Injection)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override via Translation Context Injection)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override via Translation Context Injection) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: system-prompt-override

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00213-system-prompt-override.yaml

@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ references:
     - "LLM01:2025 - Prompt Injection"
   owasp_agentic:
     - "ASI01:2026 - Agent Behaviour Hijack"
+  mitre_atlas:
+    - AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection
 compliance:
   nist_ai_rmf:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
@@ -27,6 +29,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Successful system prompt overrides can disable safety guardrails, so detections must trigger pre-defined response plans to disengage or quarantine the affected agent session as required by MG.2.3."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Injection via MCP Tool)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Injection via MCP Tool) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Injection via MCP Tool)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Injection via MCP Tool)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (System Prompt Override Injection via MCP Tool) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: system-prompt-override

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00226-identity-substitution.yaml

@@ -38,6 +38,23 @@ compliance:
       context: >-
         Matches on identity-substitution patterns trigger pre-defined risk treatment to disengage or block the manipulated session before safety constraints are bypassed, which is the containment mechanism MG.2.3 requires.
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: identity-substitution

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00227-historical-persona-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
       context: "Elaborate backstory-based jailbreaks represent a specific adversarial input pattern whose likelihood and impact must be characterized; MP.5.1 requires identifying and tracking these social-engineering prompt injection vectors that bypass simple keyword-based detection."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Historical AI Persona Jailbreak with Compliance Enforcement) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: historical-persona-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00228-structured-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -34,6 +34,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of persistent jailbreak command infrastructure must trigger mechanisms to disengage or block the manipulated session before downstream harmful generations occur; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/deactivate response plans be defined and activated on detection."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: structured-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00229-roleplay-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -30,6 +30,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of explicit policy-bypass language combined with persona assignment triggers the deactivation/superseding mechanisms required by MG.2.3 to halt the jailbroken interaction before policy-violating content is generated."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: roleplay-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00230-persona-moral-bypass.yaml

@@ -35,6 +35,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detected persona-based jailbreak attempts must trigger mechanisms to disengage or block the manipulated agent behavior before the model produces unaligned output; MG.2.3 requires these supersession controls be in place for safety-bypass events."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: persona-moral-bypass

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00231-identity-substitution.yaml

@@ -35,6 +35,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of identity substitution attacks must trigger response mechanisms to disengage or block the manipulated session before safety bypass succeeds; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/deactivate controls be in place for jailbreak conditions."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Substitution Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: identity-substitution

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00233-structured-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -34,6 +34,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of structured dual-response jailbreaks with command infrastructure triggers the deactivation and override mechanisms required by MG.2.3 to disengage the manipulated persona before it produces unsafe outputs."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Structured Dual-Response Jailbreak with Command System) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: structured-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00234-roleplay-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -30,6 +30,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
       context: "Creative-roleplay jailbreaks are adversarial inputs whose likelihood and impact must be characterized as part of the AI system's risk profile; MP.5.1 requires that these prompt-injection vectors are identified and their potential impact on guardrail integrity is tracked."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Roleplay-Based Policy Bypass Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: roleplay-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00235-persona-moral-bypass.yaml

@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detected jailbreak attempts using moral-unrestraint persona adoption must trigger pre-defined risk treatment such as blocking the prompt or disengaging the affected session; MG.2.3 mandates mechanisms exist to supersede or deactivate AI behavior when safety bypass is detected."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Persona-Based Moral Constraint Removal Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: persona-moral-bypass

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00236-pseudo-code-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches on pseudo-code jailbreak patterns trigger risk treatment plans to disengage or quarantine the manipulated agent session before unauthorized behavior redefinition takes effect; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/deactivate mechanisms be available on detection."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Pseudo-Code Structured Programming Jailbreak Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Pseudo-Code Structured Programming Jailbreak Attack) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Pseudo-Code Structured Programming Jailbreak Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Pseudo-Code Structured Programming Jailbreak Attack)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Pseudo-Code Structured Programming Jailbreak Attack) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: pseudo-code-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00237-dual-response-jailbreak.yaml

@@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "When a dual-response jailbreak is detected, MG.2.3 risk-treatment mechanisms must be invoked to suppress the jailbroken persona output or disengage the session before unsafe content is returned to the user."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Dual-Response Jailbreak with Persona Commands) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: dual-response-jailbreak

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00238-identity-replacement.yaml

@@ -33,6 +33,26 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MP.5.1"
       context: "Combined identity denial, memory manipulation, and concealment directives are adversarial input patterns whose likelihood and impact must be characterized; MP.5.1 requires these prompt-injection attack vectors be identified and tracked."
       strength: secondary
+    - subcategory: "MS.2.7"
+      context: "NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 (security and resilience evaluated and documented) is supported by this rule's runtime detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (AI Identity Denial and Persona Replacement Attack) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: identity-replacement

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00239-amoral-persona-obsession.yaml

@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Detection of amoral persona assignment with refusal suppression triggers risk treatment mechanisms to disengage or block the manipulated agent session before harmful content is generated; MG.2.3 requires these supersession controls be in place."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Amoral Persona Assignment with Obsessive Character Traits)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Amoral Persona Assignment with Obsessive Character Traits) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Amoral Persona Assignment with Obsessive Character Traits)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Amoral Persona Assignment with Obsessive Character Traits)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Amoral Persona Assignment with Obsessive Character Traits) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: amoral-persona-obsession

package/rules/prompt-injection/ATR-2026-00240-instruction-nullification-identity-repla.yaml

@@ -37,6 +37,23 @@ compliance:
     - subcategory: "MG.2.3"
       context: "Matches on persona-replacement jailbreaks (DAN, Skynet, unrestricted AI) trigger risk treatment to disengage or block the manipulated session before harmful content is produced; MG.2.3 requires these supersede/deactivate mechanisms be in place."
       strength: secondary
+  iso_42001:
+    - clause: "8.1"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 8.1 (operational planning and control, including control of externally provided processes) is operationalised by this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Previous Instruction Nullification and Identity Replacement Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - clause: "6.2"
+      context: "ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 6.2 (AI objectives and planning) calls for risk treatment of known attack patterns; this rule's detection of the prompt-injection attempt (Previous Instruction Nullification and Identity Replacement Jailbreak) is such a treatment."
+      strength: secondary
+  eu_ai_act:
+    - article: "15"
+      context: "Article 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) requires high-risk AI systems to resist unauthorised attempts to alter their use, outputs or performance; this rule provides runtime detection evidence by flagging the prompt-injection attempt (Previous Instruction Nullification and Identity Replacement Jailbreak)."
+      strength: primary
+    - article: "9"
+      context: "Article 9 (risk management system) requires identified risks to be addressed by appropriate measures; this rule is a runtime risk-treatment control that detects the prompt-injection attempt (Previous Instruction Nullification and Identity Replacement Jailbreak)."
+      strength: secondary
+    - article: "14"
+      context: "Article 14 (human oversight) requires high-risk AI systems to remain subject to effective human oversight; this rule provides detection evidence where the prompt-injection attempt (Previous Instruction Nullification and Identity Replacement Jailbreak) would bypass or undermine that oversight."
+      strength: secondary
 tags:
   category: prompt-injection
   subcategory: instruction-nullification-identity-replacement