@zh-xx/antu 0.9.0

package/examples/justification/neighbour-corridor-liability.en.json

@@ -0,0 +1,571 @@
+{
+  "specVersion": 1,
+  "type": "justification",
+  "title": "Charging in a corridor (fictional) · Why the appeal court changed the judgment",
+  "speaker": "Example City Intermediate People's Court (appeal, fictional)",
+  "groups": [
+    {
+      "id": "g-1",
+      "label": "Issue 1: is Sun Hao liable in ordinary tort?"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "g-2",
+      "label": "Issue 2: can the first instance's fairness liability apply?"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "g-3",
+      "label": "Issue 3: Sun Hao did not appeal, so can the appeal court change the judgment?"
+    }
+  ],
+  "nodes": [
+    {
+      "id": "c-1",
+      "kind": "conclusion",
+      "label": "Set aside the first-instance judgment and dismiss Qian Min's claim: Sun Hao bears no tort liability",
+      "holds": "yes"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-5",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Model Provision D, para. 1, item 2: basis for changing a judgment on appeal",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-6"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "c-2",
+      "kind": "conclusion",
+      "label": "Sun Hao bears ordinary tort liability (fault liability)",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "combine": "all",
+      "groupId": "g-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-1",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Model Provision A: one who through fault infringes another's civil rights bears tort liability",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-3"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "e-1",
+      "kind": "element",
+      "label": "The objection was improper and went beyond what was necessary",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "groupId": "g-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "e-2",
+      "kind": "element",
+      "label": "The objection is legally the cause of Qian Min's heart trouble",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "groupId": "g-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "e-3",
+      "kind": "element",
+      "label": "Sun Hao acted intentionally or negligently",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "groupId": "g-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-1",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "Sun Hao's objection was reasoned and calm, did not exceed what was necessary, and was a proper dissuasion",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-2",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "The objection only came before the attack in time; it is not its legal cause",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-3",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "Objecting to the charging protects public safety and Sun Hao had no intent to harm Qian Min",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "i-1",
+      "kind": "inference",
+      "label": "Objecting to charging could not in itself cause Qian Min's attack",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "i-2",
+      "kind": "inference",
+      "label": "Sun Hao could not foresee Qian Min's attack and was neither careless nor slack",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-1",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Corridor video (clock reads 20:14): Qian Min charges a battery in the corridor; after Sun Hao enters, the two begin to talk",
+      "date": "2030-06-02",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-1"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-2",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "The three videos have pictures but no sound; the two only talked, no pulling, no physical contact",
+      "date": "2030-06-02",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-1"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-3",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Sun Hao stayed even throughout; Qian Min spoke quickly and her voice kept rising",
+      "date": "2030-06-02",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-1"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-4",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "There is no evidence that Sun Hao shouted at Qian Min or did anything improper",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-5",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Sun Hao and Qian Min were in contact for under 5 minutes",
+      "date": "2030-06-02",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-1"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-6",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Ambulance called at 20:21; crew reaches the patient at 20:27",
+      "date": "2030-06-02T20:21",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-1"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-7",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Sun Hao had not known Qian Min before and did not know her heart history",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-8",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Once he knew, Sun Hao promptly helped call the ambulance and waited with her",
+      "groupId": "g-1",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "c-3",
+      "kind": "conclusion",
+      "label": "By fairness Sun Hao should compensate Qian Min 8,000 yuan (what the first instance did)",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "groupId": "g-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-2",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Model Provision B: where neither victim nor actor was at fault, the loss may be shared as the facts require",
+      "groupId": "g-2",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-4"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "e-4",
+      "kind": "element",
+      "label": "The act is legally the cause of the harm, and neither side was at fault",
+      "holds": "no",
+      "groupId": "g-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-4",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "There is no legal causation between the objection and the attack, so the premise of Model Provision B fails",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-2",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-5",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "Applying fairness under Model Provision B to make Sun Hao compensate was an error of law",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-2",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-9",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "The first instance ordered Sun Hao to pay Qian Min 8,000 yuan because she had a sudden heart problem after the quarrel",
+      "groupId": "g-2",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "c-4",
+      "kind": "conclusion",
+      "label": "The appeal court should change the first-instance judgment",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-3",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Model Provision C: the appeal is heard on the grounds of appeal, unless the judgment breaks a mandatory rule or harms the state, the public interest or others' lawful rights",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-5"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-4",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Example City rules: charging e-bike batteries is banned in corridors and other public places and residents may stop it",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-7"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "n-6",
+      "kind": "norm",
+      "label": "Basic principles and purpose of the civil rules (model): protect the public interest and public order and good morals, promote good social conduct",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-8"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "e-5",
+      "kind": "element",
+      "label": "The first instance harms the public interest (the exception to the limit of the grounds of appeal)",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-6",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "Sun Hao's objection to the charging was lawful and proper, and protected fire safety in the building and the public interest",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "j-7",
+      "kind": "judgement",
+      "label": "Making residents who object properly share the loss would deter them from protecting public safety, harm the public interest, and run against the purpose of the rules",
+      "holds": "yes",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "f-10",
+      "kind": "fact",
+      "label": "Sun Hao did not appeal after the first-instance judgment",
+      "groupId": "g-3",
+      "sourceIds": [
+        "s-2"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "links": [
+    {
+      "from": "n-5",
+      "to": "c-1",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-1",
+      "to": "e-1",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "e-1",
+      "to": "c-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-1",
+      "to": "e-2",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "e-2",
+      "to": "c-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-1",
+      "to": "e-3",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "e-3",
+      "to": "c-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "c-2",
+      "to": "c-1",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-2",
+      "to": "j-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-3",
+      "to": "j-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-4",
+      "to": "j-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-1",
+      "to": "e-1",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-2",
+      "to": "i-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-3",
+      "to": "i-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-5",
+      "to": "i-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-6",
+      "to": "i-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "i-1",
+      "to": "j-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-2",
+      "to": "e-2",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-7",
+      "to": "i-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-8",
+      "to": "i-2"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "i-2",
+      "to": "e-3",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-1",
+      "to": "j-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-7",
+      "to": "j-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-3",
+      "to": "e-3",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-2",
+      "to": "e-4",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "e-4",
+      "to": "c-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-4",
+      "to": "e-4",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-5",
+      "to": "c-3",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-9",
+      "to": "c-3"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "c-3",
+      "to": "c-1",
+      "stance": "against"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-3",
+      "to": "e-5",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-4",
+      "to": "j-6",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "n-6",
+      "to": "j-7",
+      "stance": "basis"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-6",
+      "to": "j-7"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "j-7",
+      "to": "e-5"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "e-5",
+      "to": "c-4"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "f-10",
+      "to": "c-4",
+      "stance": "against",
+      "label": "Not within the scope of the appeal"
+    },
+    {
+      "from": "c-4",
+      "to": "c-1"
+    }
+  ],
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "id": "s-1",
+      "type": "case",
+      "name": "(2031) Shi Min Zhong No. 1 · facts found by this court",
+      "loc": {
+        "caseNo": "(2031) Shi Min Zhong No. 1",
+        "court": "Example City Intermediate People's Court, Example Province"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-2",
+      "type": "case",
+      "name": "(2031) Shi Min Zhong No. 1 · this court's opinion",
+      "loc": {
+        "caseNo": "(2031) Shi Min Zhong No. 1",
+        "court": "Example City Intermediate People's Court, Example Province"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-3",
+      "type": "statute",
+      "name": "Model Provision A",
+      "loc": {
+        "lawName": "Model Act (fictional)",
+        "article": 1,
+        "version": "model edition"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-4",
+      "type": "statute",
+      "name": "Model Provision B",
+      "loc": {
+        "lawName": "Model Act (fictional)",
+        "article": 2,
+        "version": "model edition"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-5",
+      "type": "statute",
+      "name": "Model Provision C",
+      "loc": {
+        "lawName": "Model Act (fictional)",
+        "article": 3,
+        "version": "model edition"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-6",
+      "type": "statute",
+      "name": "Model Provision D",
+      "loc": {
+        "lawName": "Model Act (fictional)",
+        "article": 4,
+        "version": "model edition"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-7",
+      "type": "other",
+      "name": "Example City rules (charging e-bike batteries banned in corridors and other public places)",
+      "loc": {
+        "note": "The judgment says only \"under the Example City rules\" and does not give their name or article"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "s-8",
+      "type": "other",
+      "name": "Basic principles and purpose of the civil rules (model)",
+      "loc": {
+        "note": "The judgment gives no specific article"
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}