@wazir-dev/cli 1.2.0 → 1.4.0

package/docs/research/2026-03-20-agents/ac009da573eff7f65.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+{"parentUuid":null,"isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":"Research ONLY — no code. How do review systems classify and prioritize findings?\n\nResearch:\n1. SonarQube severity levels — Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor, Info. How are they defined?\n2. CodeClimate issue categories — Bug Risk, Complexity, Duplication, Style. How classified?\n3. GitHub code scanning alert severity — Critical, High, Medium, Low. What criteria?\n4. ESLint rule severity — error, warn, off. How do projects customize?\n\nFor Wazir's review findings:\n- What severity levels? (blocker = must fix, high = should fix, medium = consider, low = note)\n- What categories? (correctness, security, performance, style, drift, coverage)\n- How to auto-classify? (security patterns = always high, style = always low?)\n- How does classification affect the gating agent's verdict?\n- How does classification feed the learning system? (recurring high findings → antipatterns)\n\nOutput: Finding classification schema for Wazir with severity levels, categories, and automation rules."},"uuid":"8278139f-46f3-4bcb-a1dc-97f6d12c77ec","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.662Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8278139f-46f3-4bcb-a1dc-97f6d12c77ec","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01RLBHRZ5rHdeR31i3K83j4S","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI'll research how existing review systems classify findings, then synthesize a schema for Wazir. Let me start by examining what Wazir already has in place for review findings, and then research the external systems."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2677,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2677,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJ7sN4Zc6AonwdTTFZ","type":"assistant","uuid":"3ef92b90-2903-4f4f-aec8-f6d844d6cd07","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:02.620Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3ef92b90-2903-4f4f-aec8-f6d844d6cd07","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01RLBHRZ5rHdeR31i3K83j4S","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"severity|blocker|critical|major|minor","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2677,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2677,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJ7sN4Zc6AonwdTTFZ","type":"assistant","uuid":"f5e8ed93-b0f0-4bb3-8577-a6b831e82afa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:03.964Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f5e8ed93-b0f0-4bb3-8577-a6b831e82afa","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","parentToolUseID":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","uuid":"9a394286-d705-4633-b5ba-4687347d742d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:03.964Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9a394286-d705-4633-b5ba-4687347d742d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","toolUseID":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.066Z","uuid":"5b1c9883-e6cd-448b-b578-1771233e39c9","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f5e8ed93-b0f0-4bb3-8577-a6b831e82afa","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_0119n1Rq9VRp2UFYcekDGBNp","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/run-audit.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/design-review.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\ninput/2026-03-20-remaining.md\ninput/2026-03-20-critical-fixes.md\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\nschemas/phase-report.schema.json\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/launch-checklist.md\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\ndocs/readmes/features/expertise/README.md\ndocs/readmes/features/schemas/README.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/humanize.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/requesting-code-review.md"}]},"uuid":"6faedc8b-62cf-4183-ba67-da5729cc31fa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.065Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f5e8ed93-b0f0-4bb3-8577-a6b831e82afa","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6faedc8b-62cf-4183-ba67-da5729cc31fa","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01RLBHRZ5rHdeR31i3K83j4S","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"finding|verdict|gating","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2677,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2677,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJ7sN4Zc6AonwdTTFZ","type":"assistant","uuid":"8142b385-af6e-4398-9824-4057431bc74e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.903Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8142b385-af6e-4398-9824-4057431bc74e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","uuid":"cfc7bab9-d60a-4192-b856-b922f796a68b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.906Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cfc7bab9-d60a-4192-b856-b922f796a68b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","toolUseID":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.004Z","uuid":"572d3cef-21b8-43bb-b5f1-5e71eb0e2bb3","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8142b385-af6e-4398-9824-4057431bc74e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01A99g2kyyH4Bg54qU7yg9rj","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\ndocs/research/2026-03-20-enforcement-research.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/discover.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/learn.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/plan-review.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/review.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/run-audit.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/spec-challenge.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/specify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/verify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/clarifier.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/learner.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/researcher.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/verifier.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/clarify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/design-review.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/brainstorming/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md"}]},"uuid":"8460aa2d-2293-4e3a-8d25-8262cf5db7c0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.004Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"8142b385-af6e-4398-9824-4057431bc74e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8460aa2d-2293-4e3a-8d25-8262cf5db7c0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01RLBHRZ5rHdeR31i3K83j4S","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"category.*review|review.*category|classification","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2677,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"output_tokens":372,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2677},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJ7sN4Zc6AonwdTTFZ","type":"assistant","uuid":"d6d9d06c-608e-440b-87d7-2e560853ee08","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.714Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d6d9d06c-608e-440b-87d7-2e560853ee08","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","uuid":"b805961b-1f67-4b61-99af-fe4919d622dd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.714Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b805961b-1f67-4b61-99af-fe4919d622dd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","toolUseID":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.795Z","uuid":"b6b51e9c-e86c-4d8f-b909-675dbd02101a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d6d9d06c-608e-440b-87d7-2e560853ee08","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01H8w4T286i2GWGa8qoMGb4M","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\ndocs/readmes/features/expertise/README.md\nhooks/context-mode-router\nskills/humanize/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-enhancement-decisions.md\nexpertise/security/compliance-frameworks.md\nexpertise/quality/evidence-based-verification.md\nexpertise/quality/ml-model-audit.md\nexpertise/backend/embedded-firmware.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/architecture/data/sql-vs-nosql.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/cap-theorem-and-tradeoffs.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/idempotency-and-retry.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/saga-pattern.md\nexpertise/architecture/foundations/domain-driven-design.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/information-architecture.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/usability-testing.md\nexpertise/design/foundations/typography.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/notifications.md"}]},"uuid":"06957853-cc17-4877-bdd5-be7ebfd1754d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.795Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"d6d9d06c-608e-440b-87d7-2e560853ee08","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"06957853-cc17-4877-bdd5-be7ebfd1754d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017xq88BBW6Jx1qxq11LNo9T","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Let me read the key files that define Wazir's current review system."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1485,"cache_read_input_tokens":10422,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1485,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKbFvUZAtjJXx3KiBQ","type":"assistant","uuid":"a071a7a2-7f7b-47b2-8f54-53dedf67a03e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:22.145Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a071a7a2-7f7b-47b2-8f54-53dedf67a03e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017xq88BBW6Jx1qxq11LNo9T","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/exports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1485,"cache_read_input_tokens":10422,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1485,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKbFvUZAtjJXx3KiBQ","type":"assistant","uuid":"48931966-d163-441f-91ae-7616a776f3fe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:22.602Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"48931966-d163-441f-91ae-7616a776f3fe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","uuid":"e0b87e6f-db49-4911-aeaf-ad696d10f662","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:22.603Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e0b87e6f-db49-4911-aeaf-ad696d10f662","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","toolUseID":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:22.676Z","uuid":"cf724b4b-6b56-461b-b5bc-1da68733625c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"48931966-d163-441f-91ae-7616a776f3fe","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01A59HnRKYSqZ8uALEcAm1qa","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# reviewer\n     2→\n     3→## Purpose\n     4→\n     5→Perform adversarial review to find correctness, scope, wiring, verification, and drift failures. Owns all review loops: research-review, clarification-review, spec-challenge, design-review, plan-review, task-review, and final review.\n     6→\n     7→## Inputs\n     8→\n     9→- changed files\n    10→- approved spec and plan\n    11→- verification evidence\n    12→\n    13→## Allowed Tools\n    14→\n    15→- diff inspection\n    16→- targeted file reads\n    17→- source-backed comparison to spec/plan\n    18→- secondary model review when available\n    19→- Wazir CLI recall and index commands (see Context retrieval)\n    20→- review loop pattern (see docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md)\n    21→\n    22→## Context retrieval\n    23→\n    24→Default approach: recall L1, escalate to direct read for flagged issues\n    25→- Read the diff first (primary input)\n    26→- Use `wazir index search-symbols <name>` to locate related code\n    27→- Use `wazir recall symbol <name-or-id> --tier L1` to check structural alignment\n    28→- Escalate to direct file read only for: logic errors, missing edge cases, integration concerns\n    29→- If recall fails, fall back to direct file reads\n    30→\n    31→## Required Outputs\n    32→\n    33→- findings with severity\n    34→- rationale tied to evidence\n    35→- explicit no-findings verdict when applicable\n    36→- review loop pass logs with source attribution ([Wazir], [Codex], [Both])\n    37→\n    38→Review mode is always passed explicitly by the caller (--mode). The reviewer does not auto-detect mode from artifact availability.\n    39→\n    40→## Git-Flow Responsibilities\n    41→\n    42→- flag missing or low-quality changelog entries as findings with severity\n    43→- flag user-facing changes without corresponding changelog entries\n    44→- verify commit messages accurately describe changes (not just format — content quality)\n    45→\n    46→## Writing Quality\n    47→\n    48→All review findings must avoid AI vocabulary patterns. Findings should be direct and evidence-cited, not padded with filler phrases. For domain-specific rules, see `expertise/humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md`.\n    49→\n    50→## Escalation Rules\n    51→\n    52→- escalate when evidence is insufficient to make a defensible review call\n    53→\n    54→## Failure Conditions\n    55→\n    56→- vague findings\n    57→- uncited criticism\n    58→- rubber-stamp approval\n    59→"}]},"uuid":"d53bcd77-7428-42c4-b6a3-462ceec52168","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:22.676Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"48931966-d163-441f-91ae-7616a776f3fe","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d53bcd77-7428-42c4-b6a3-462ceec52168","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017xq88BBW6Jx1qxq11LNo9T","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1485,"cache_read_input_tokens":10422,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1485,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKbFvUZAtjJXx3KiBQ","type":"assistant","uuid":"65fa7f1e-e7a3-43f9-9f39-a2a31178d24e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.044Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"65fa7f1e-e7a3-43f9-9f39-a2a31178d24e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","uuid":"5c171625-d72f-4f3f-aab9-7638781f338a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.044Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5c171625-d72f-4f3f-aab9-7638781f338a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017xq88BBW6Jx1qxq11LNo9T","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1485,"cache_read_input_tokens":10422,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1485,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKbFvUZAtjJXx3KiBQ","type":"assistant","uuid":"bf65224f-0e85-4478-add7-e53ea16b423b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.503Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bf65224f-0e85-4478-add7-e53ea16b423b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","parentToolUseID":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","uuid":"d218dc60-8156-42e6-8c08-b8e8f4167dc2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.505Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d218dc60-8156-42e6-8c08-b8e8f4167dc2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017xq88BBW6Jx1qxq11LNo9T","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/schemas/phase-report.schema.json"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1485,"cache_read_input_tokens":10422,"output_tokens":288,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1485},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKbFvUZAtjJXx3KiBQ","type":"assistant","uuid":"e02c2c50-b87e-4d0c-bf59-85156f6147ba","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.961Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e02c2c50-b87e-4d0c-bf59-85156f6147ba","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","uuid":"3e219c92-e914-4d5e-a105-f7b2e926eac3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.961Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3e219c92-e914-4d5e-a105-f7b2e926eac3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","toolUseID":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:24.013Z","uuid":"c823d1d7-091f-42eb-b391-c33b25384916","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e02c2c50-b87e-4d0c-bf59-85156f6147ba","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Bcnfof2Ju2MkJUzM8AdWki","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→{\n     2→  \"$schema\": \"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema\",\n     3→  \"$id\": \"https://wazir.dev/schemas/phase-report.schema.json\",\n     4→  \"title\": \"Phase Report\",\n     5→  \"type\": \"object\",\n     6→  \"required\": [\"phase_name\", \"run_id\", \"timestamp\", \"attempted_actions\", \"drift_analysis\", \"quality_metrics\", \"risk_flags\", \"decisions\"],\n     7→  \"properties\": {\n     8→    \"phase_name\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n     9→    \"parent_phase\": {\n    10→      \"type\": \"string\",\n    11→      \"enum\": [\"init\", \"clarifier\", \"executor\", \"final_review\"],\n    12→      \"description\": \"Top-level phase this workflow belongs to\"\n    13→    },\n    14→    \"workflow\": {\n    15→      \"type\": \"string\",\n    16→      \"description\": \"Specific workflow name within the parent phase (e.g. discover, specify, execute)\"\n    17→    },\n    18→    \"run_id\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n    19→    \"timestamp\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"format\": \"date-time\" },\n    20→    \"attempted_actions\": {\n    21→      \"type\": \"array\",\n    22→      \"items\": {\n    23→        \"type\": \"object\",\n    24→        \"required\": [\"description\", \"outcome\", \"evidence\"],\n    25→        \"properties\": {\n    26→          \"description\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n    27→          \"outcome\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"enum\": [\"success\", \"fail\", \"uncertain\"] },\n    28→          \"evidence\": { \"type\": \"string\" }\n    29→        },\n    30→        \"additionalProperties\": true\n    31→      }\n    32→    },\n    33→    \"drift_analysis\": {\n    34→      \"type\": \"object\",\n    35→      \"required\": [\"delta\"],\n    36→      \"properties\": {\n    37→        \"delta\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 0 },\n    38→        \"description\": { \"type\": \"string\" }\n    39→      },\n    40→      \"additionalProperties\": true\n    41→    },\n    42→    \"quality_metrics\": {\n    43→      \"type\": \"object\",\n    44→      \"properties\": {\n    45→        \"test_pass_count\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 0 },\n    46→        \"test_fail_count\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 0 },\n    47→        \"lint_errors\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 0 },\n    48→        \"type_errors\": { \"type\": \"integer\", \"minimum\": 0 }\n    49→      },\n    50→      \"additionalProperties\": true\n    51→    },\n    52→    \"risk_flags\": {\n    53→      \"type\": \"array\",\n    54→      \"items\": {\n    55→        \"type\": \"object\",\n    56→        \"required\": [\"severity\", \"description\"],\n    57→        \"properties\": {\n    58→          \"severity\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"enum\": [\"low\", \"medium\", \"high\"] },\n    59→          \"description\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n    60→          \"mitigation\": { \"type\": \"string\" }\n    61→        },\n    62→        \"additionalProperties\": true\n    63→      }\n    64→    },\n    65→    \"decisions\": {\n    66→      \"type\": \"array\",\n    67→      \"items\": {\n    68→        \"type\": \"object\",\n    69→        \"required\": [\"description\", \"rationale\"],\n    70→        \"properties\": {\n    71→          \"description\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n    72→          \"rationale\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"minLength\": 1 },\n    73→          \"alternatives_considered\": { \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": { \"type\": \"string\" } },\n    74→          \"source\": { \"type\": \"string\" }\n    75→        },\n    76→        \"additionalProperties\": true\n    77→      }\n    78→    },\n    79→    \"verdict_recommendation\": {\n    80→      \"type\": \"object\",\n    81→      \"properties\": {\n    82→        \"verdict\": { \"type\": \"string\", \"enum\": [\"continue\", \"loop_back\", \"escalate\"] },\n    83→        \"reasoning\": { \"type\": \"string\" }\n    84→      },\n    85→      \"additionalProperties\": true\n    86→    }\n    87→  },\n    88→  \"additionalProperties\": true\n    89→}\n    90→"}]},"uuid":"b94104d1-9bb2-4414-bdb9-b3ac914ddca4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:24.013Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"e02c2c50-b87e-4d0c-bf59-85156f6147ba","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b94104d1-9bb2-4414-bdb9-b3ac914ddca4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","toolUseID":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:29.621Z","uuid":"4fae66b9-bd25-4669-b033-3eb363381411","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bf65224f-0e85-4478-add7-e53ea16b423b","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_018GMaZp5ZXkZLcywW6HYeFm","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:reviewer\n     3→description: Run the review phase — adversarial review of implementation against the approved spec, plan, and verification evidence.\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Reviewer\n     7→\n     8→## Model Annotation\n     9→When multi-model mode is enabled:\n    10→- **Sonnet** for internal review passes (internal-review)\n    11→- **Opus** for final review mode (final-review)\n    12→- **Opus** for spec-challenge mode (spec-harden)\n    13→- **Opus** for design-review mode (design)\n    14→\n    15→## Command Routing\n    16→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    17→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    18→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    19→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    20→\n    21→## Codebase Exploration\n    22→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    23→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    24→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    25→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    26→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    27→\n    28→Run the Final Review phase — or any review mode invoked by other phases.\n    29→\n    30→The reviewer role owns all review loops across the pipeline: research-review, clarification-review, spec-challenge, design-review, plan-review, per-task execution review, and final review. Each uses phase-specific dimensions from `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`.\n    31→\n    32→**Key principle for `final` mode:** Compare implementation against the **ORIGINAL INPUT** (briefing + input files), NOT the task specs. The executor's per-task reviewer already validated against task specs — that concern is covered. The final reviewer catches drift: does what we built match what the user actually asked for?\n    33→\n    34→**Reviewer-owned responsibilities** (callers must NOT replicate these):\n    35→1. **Two-tier review** — internal review first (fast, cheap, expertise-loaded), Codex second (fresh eyes on clean code)\n    36→2. **Dimension selection** — the reviewer selects the correct dimension set for the review mode and depth\n    37→3. **Pass counting** — the reviewer tracks pass numbers and enforces the depth-based cap (quick=3, standard=5, deep=7)\n    38→4. **Finding attribution** — each finding is tagged `[Internal]`, `[Codex]`, or `[Both]` based on source\n    39→5. **Dimension set recording** — each review pass file records which canonical dimension set was used, enabling Phase Scoring (first vs final delta)\n    40→6. **Learning pipeline** — ALL findings (internal + Codex) feed into `state.sqlite` and the learning system\n    41→\n    42→## Review Modes\n    43→\n    44→The reviewer operates in different modes depending on the phase. Mode MUST be passed explicitly by the caller (`--mode <mode>`). The reviewer does NOT auto-detect mode from artifact availability. If `--mode` is not provided, ask the user which review to run.\n    45→\n    46→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n    47→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n    48→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts, approved spec/plan/design | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Scored verdict (PASS/FAIL) |\n    49→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    50→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    51→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan artifact | 8 plan dims (7 + input coverage) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    52→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes or `--base` SHA | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    53→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    54→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    55→\n    56→Each mode follows the review loop pattern in `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`. Pass counts are fixed by depth (quick=3, standard=5, deep=7). No extension.\n    57→\n    58→### CHANGELOG Enforcement\n    59→\n    60→In `task-review` and `final` modes, flag missing CHANGELOG entries for user-facing changes as **[warning]** severity. User-facing changes include new features, behavior changes, and bug fixes visible to users. Internal changes (refactors, tooling, tests) do not require CHANGELOG entries.\n    61→\n    62→## Prerequisites\n    63→\n    64→Prerequisites depend on the review mode:\n    65→\n    66→### `final` mode\n    67→\n    68→**Phase Prerequisites (Hard Gate):** Before proceeding, verify ALL of these artifacts exist. If ANY is missing, **STOP** and report which are missing.\n    69→\n    70→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/clarification.md`\n    71→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md`\n    72→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/design.md`\n    73→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/execution-plan.md`\n    74→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/verification-proof.md`\n    75→\n    76→If any file is missing:\n    77→\n    78→> **Cannot run final review: missing prerequisite artifacts.**\n    79→>\n    80→> Missing: [list missing files]\n    81→>\n    82→> Run `/wazir:clarifier` (for clarified/* files) or `/wazir:executor` (for verification-proof.md) first.\n    83→\n    84→1. Check `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` has completed task artifacts. If not, tell the user to run `/wazir:executor` first.\n    85→2. Read the approved spec, plan, and design from `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/`.\n    86→3. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    87→\n    88→### `task-review` mode\n    89→1. Uncommitted changes exist for the current task, or a `--base` SHA is provided for committed changes.\n    90→2. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    91→3. **Commit discipline check:** If uncommitted changes span work from multiple tasks (e.g., files from task N and task N+1 are both modified), REJECT immediately: \"REJECTED: Multiple tasks in single commit. Split into per-task commits before review.\" This is a blocking finding — no other dimensions are evaluated until resolved.\n    92→4. **Security sensitivity check:** Run `detectSecurityPatterns` from `tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js` against the diff. If `triggered === true`, add the 6 security review dimensions (injection, auth bypass, data exposure, CSRF/SSRF, XSS, secrets leakage) to the standard 5 task-execution dimensions for this review pass. Security findings use severity levels: critical (exploitable), high (likely exploitable), medium (defense-in-depth gap), low (best-practice deviation).\n    93→\n    94→### `spec-challenge`, `design-review`, `plan-review`, `research-review`, `clarification-review` modes\n    95→1. The appropriate input artifact for the mode exists.\n    96→2. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    97→3. **`plan-review` additional dimension — Input Coverage:**\n    98→   - Read the original input/briefing from `.wazir/input/briefing.md` and any `input/*.md` files\n    99→   - Count distinct items/requirements in the input\n   100→   - Count tasks in the execution plan\n   101→   - If `tasks_in_plan < items_in_input` → **HIGH** finding: \"Plan covers [N] of [M] input items. Missing: [list of uncovered items]\"\n   102→   - If `tasks_in_plan >= items_in_input` → dimension passes\n   103→   - One task MAY cover multiple input items if justified in the task description\n   104→   - This is the review-level enforcement of the \"no scope reduction\" rule\n   105→\n   106→## Review Process (`final` mode)\n   107→\n   108→**Before starting this phase, output to the user:**\n   109→\n   110→> **Final Review** — About to run adversarial 9-dimension review comparing your implementation against the original input, not just the task specs. The executor's per-task reviewer already validated correctness per-task — this catches drift between what you asked for and what was actually built.\n   111→>\n   112→> **Why this matters:** Without this, implementation drift ships undetected. Per-task review confirms each task matches its spec, but cannot catch: tasks that collectively miss the original intent, scope creep that added unrequested features, or acceptance criteria that were rewritten to match implementation instead of input.\n   113→>\n   114→> **Looking for:** Logic errors, missing features, dead code, unsubstantiated \"it works\" claims, scope creep, security gaps, stale documentation\n   115→\n   116→**Input:** Read the ORIGINAL user input (`.wazir/input/briefing.md`, `input/` directory files) and compare against what was built. This catches intent drift that task-level review misses.\n   117→\n   118→### Input Sources (read before scoring)\n   119→1. Read the original input: `.wazir/input/briefing.md` or `.wazir/runs/<id>/sources/input.md`\n   120→2. Read user feedback: `.wazir/runs/<id>/user-input-log.ndjson` (parse each JSON line)\n   121→3. Count distinct items/requirements in the original input\n   122→4. If `user-input-log.ndjson` does not exist: log a finding — \"User input not captured — cannot verify intent alignment\" (severity: warning)\n   123→\n   124→Perform adversarial review across 9 dimensions:\n   125→\n   126→1. **Correctness** — Does the code do what the original input asked for? *(catches: logic errors, wrong behavior, spec violations)*\n   127→2. **Completeness** — Are all requirements from the original input met? *(catches: missing features, unimplemented acceptance criteria, partially delivered items)*\n   128→3. **Wiring** — Are all paths connected end-to-end? *(catches: dead code, disconnected paths, missing imports, orphaned routes)*\n   129→4. **Verification** — Is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim? *(catches: false claims of \"it works\" without evidence, untested code paths, missing type coverage)*\n   130→5. **Drift** — Does the implementation match what the user originally requested? (not just the plan — the INPUT) *(catches: scope creep, plan deviations, unauthorized changes, gold-plating)*\n   131→6. **Quality** — Code style, naming, error handling, security *(catches: security vulnerabilities, poor error handling, inconsistent naming, missing input validation)*\n   132→7. **Documentation** — Changelog entries, commit messages, comments *(catches: missing changelogs, wrong commit messages, stale comments, undocumented breaking changes)*\n   133→8. **Intent Alignment** — Does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including any mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec (which may have drifted). Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction. *(catches: spec drift from user intent, ignored user corrections, misinterpreted requirements)*\n   134→9. **Scope Coverage** — Count distinct items in the original input. Count items implemented (via commits/diffs). If any input item is missing from the implementation, flag as HIGH finding with the specific missing item. Score = (implemented items / input items) * 10. *(catches: dropped requirements, partial delivery, silent scope reduction)*\n   135→\n   136→## Context Retrieval\n   137→\n   138→- Read the diff first (primary input)\n   139→- Use `wazir index search-symbols <name>` to locate related code\n   140→- Use `wazir recall symbol <name-or-id> --tier L1` to check structural alignment\n   141→- Read files directly for: logic errors, missing edge cases, integration concerns\n   142→\n   143→## Scoring (`final` mode)\n   144→\n   145→Score each dimension 0-10. Total out of 90 (9 dimensions x 10 each).\n   146→\n   147→| Verdict | Score | Action |\n   148→|---------|-------|--------|\n   149→| **PASS** | 72+ | Ready for PR or merge |\n   150→| **NEEDS MINOR FIXES** | 54-71 | Auto-fix and re-review |\n   151→| **NEEDS REWORK** | 36-53 | Re-run affected tasks |\n   152→| **FAIL** | 0-35 | Fundamental issues |\n   153→\n   154→## Two-Tier Review Flow\n   155→\n   156→The review process has two tiers. Internal review catches ~80% of issues quickly and cheaply. Codex review provides fresh eyes on clean code.\n   157→\n   158→### Tier 1: Internal Review (Fast, Cheap, Expertise-Loaded)\n   159→\n   160→1. **Compose expertise:** Load relevant expertise modules from `expertise/composition-map.yaml` into context based on the review mode and detected stack. This gives the internal reviewer domain-specific knowledge.\n   161→2. **Run internal review** using the dimension set for the current mode. When multi-model is enabled, use **Sonnet** (not Opus) for internal review passes — it's fast and good enough for pattern matching against expertise.\n   162→3. **Produce findings:** Each finding is tagged `[Internal]` with severity (blocking, warning, note).\n   163→4. **Fix cycle:** If blocking findings exist, the executor fixes them. Re-run internal review. Repeat until clean or cap reached.\n   164→\n   165→Internal review passes are logged to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<mode>-internal-pass-<N>.md`.\n   166→\n   167→### Tier 2: External Review (Fresh Eyes on Clean Code)\n   168→\n   169→Only runs AFTER Tier 1 produces a clean pass (no blocking findings).\n   170→\n   171→Read `.wazir/state/config.json`. If `multi_tool.tools` includes external reviewers:\n   172→\n   173→#### Codex Review\n   174→\n   175→**For detailed Codex CLI usage, see `wz:codex-cli` skill.**\n   176→\n   177→If `codex` is in `multi_tool.tools`:\n   178→\n   179→1. Run Codex review against the current changes:\n   180→   ```bash\n   181→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   182→   CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   183→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Wazir review: <brief summary>\" \\\n   184→     \"Review against these acceptance criteria: <paste criteria from spec>\" \\\n   185→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/codex-review.md\n   186→   ```\n   187→   Or if changes are committed:\n   188→   ```bash\n   189→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   190→   CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   191→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <base-branch> --title \"Wazir review: <brief summary>\" \\\n   192→     \"Review against these acceptance criteria: <paste criteria from spec>\" \\\n   193→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/codex-review.md\n   194→   ```\n   195→\n   196→2. **Extract findings only** (context protection): After tee, use `execute_file` to extract only the final findings from the Codex output (everything after the last `codex` marker). If context-mode is unavailable, use `tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2`. If no marker found, fail closed (0 findings, warn user). See `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` \"Codex Output Context Protection\" for full protocol.\n   197→3. Incorporate extracted Codex findings into your scoring — if Codex flags something you missed, add it. If you disagree with a Codex finding, note it with your rationale.\n   198→\n   199→**Codex error handling:** If codex exits non-zero (auth/rate-limit/transport failure), log the full stderr, mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log, and use internal review findings only for that pass. Do NOT treat a Codex failure as a clean review. Do NOT skip the pass. The next pass still attempts Codex (transient failures may recover).\n   200→\n   201→**Code review scoping by mode:**\n   202→- Use `--uncommitted` when reviewing uncommitted changes (`task-review` mode).\n   203→- Use `--base <sha>` when reviewing committed changes.\n   204→- Use `codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\"` with stdin pipe for non-code artifacts (`spec-challenge`, `design-review`, `plan-review`, `research-review`, `clarification-review` modes).\n   205→- See `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` for code review scoping rules.\n   206→\n   207→#### Gemini Review\n   208→\n   209→If `gemini` is in `multi_tool.tools`, follow the same pattern using the Gemini CLI when available. **For detailed Gemini CLI usage, see `wz:gemini-cli` skill.**\n   210→\n   211→### Fix Cycle (Codex Findings)\n   212→\n   213→If Codex produces blocking findings:\n   214→1. Executor fixes the Codex findings\n   215→2. Re-run internal review (quick pass) to verify fixes didn't introduce regressions\n   216→3. Optionally re-run Codex for a clean pass\n   217→\n   218→### Merging Findings\n   219→\n   220→The final review report must clearly attribute each finding:\n   221→- `[Internal]` — found by Tier 1 internal review\n   222→- `[Codex]` — found by Tier 2 Codex review\n   223→- `[Gemini]` — found by Tier 2 Gemini review\n   224→- `[Both]` — found independently by multiple sources\n   225→\n   226→### Finding Persistence (Learning Pipeline)\n   227→\n   228→ALL findings from both tiers are persisted to `state.sqlite` for cross-run learning:\n   229→\n   230→```javascript\n   231→// After each review pass\n   232→const { insertFinding, getRecurringFindingHashes } = require('tooling/src/state/db');\n   233→const db = openStateDb(stateRoot);\n   234→\n   235→for (const finding of allFindings) {\n   236→  insertFinding(db, {\n   237→    run_id: runId,\n   238→    phase: reviewMode,\n   239→    source: finding.attribution, // 'internal', 'codex', 'gemini'\n   240→    severity: finding.severity,\n   241→    description: finding.description,\n   242→    finding_hash: hashFinding(finding.description),\n   243→  });\n   244→}\n   245→\n   246→// Check for recurring patterns\n   247→const recurring = getRecurringFindingHashes(db, 2);\n   248→// Recurring findings → auto-propose as learnings in the learn phase\n   249→```\n   250→\n   251→This is how Wazir evolves — findings that recur across runs become accepted learnings injected into future executor context, preventing the same mistakes.\n   252→\n   253→## Interaction Mode Awareness\n   254→\n   255→Read `interaction_mode` from run-config:\n   256→\n   257→- **`auto`:** No user checkpoints. Present verdict and let gating agent decide. On escalation, write reason and STOP.\n   258→- **`guided`:** Standard behavior — present verdict, ask user how to proceed.\n   259→- **`interactive`:** Discuss findings with user: \"I found a potential auth bypass in `src/auth.js:42` — here's why I rated it high severity. Do you agree, or is there context I'm missing?\" Show detailed reasoning for each dimension score.\n   260→\n   261→## CLI/Context-Mode Enforcement\n   262→\n   263→In ALL review modes, check for these violations:\n   264→\n   265→1. **Index usage enforcement:** If the agent performed >5 direct file reads (Read tool) without a preceding `wazir index search-symbols` query, flag as **[warning]** finding: \"Agent performed [N] direct file reads without using wazir index. Use `wazir index search-symbols <query>` before reading files to reduce context consumption.\"\n   266→\n   267→2. **Context-mode enforcement:** If the agent ran a large-category command (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting — as classified by `hooks/routing-matrix.json`) using native Bash instead of context-mode tools (when context-mode is available), flag as **[warning]** finding: \"Large command `[cmd]` run without context-mode. Route through `mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute` to reduce context usage.\"\n   268→\n   269→These are warnings, not blocking findings — they improve efficiency but don't affect correctness.\n   270→\n   271→## Task-Review Log Filenames\n   272→\n   273→In `task-review` mode, use task-scoped log filenames and cap tracking:\n   274→- Log filenames: `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md`\n   275→- Cap tracking: `wazir capture loop-check --task-id <NNN>` (each task has its own independent cap counter)\n   276→\n   277→## Output\n   278→\n   279→Save review results to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/review.md` with:\n   280→- Findings with severity (blocking, warning, note)\n   281→- Rationale tied to evidence\n   282→- Score breakdown\n   283→- Verdict\n   284→\n   285→Run the phase report and display it to the user:\n   286→```bash\n   287→wazir report phase --run <run-id> --phase <review-mode>\n   288→```\n   289→\n   290→Output the report content to the user in the conversation.\n   291→\n   292→## Phase Report Generation\n   293→\n   294→After completing any review pass, generate a phase report following `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`:\n   295→\n   296→1. **`attempted_actions`** — Populate from the review findings. Each finding becomes an action entry:\n   297→   - `description`: the finding summary\n   298→   - `outcome`: `\"success\"` if the finding passed, `\"fail\"` if it is a blocking issue, `\"uncertain\"` if ambiguous\n   299→   - `evidence`: the rationale or evidence supporting the outcome\n   300→\n   301→2. **`drift_analysis`** — Compare review findings against the approved spec:\n   302→   - `delta`: count of deviations between implementation and spec (0 = no drift)\n   303→   - `description`: summary of any drift detected and its impact\n   304→\n   305→3. **`quality_metrics`** — Populate from test, lint, and type-check results gathered during review:\n   306→   - `test_pass_count`, `test_fail_count`: from test runner output\n   307→   - `lint_errors`: from linter output\n   308→   - `type_errors`: from type checker output\n   309→\n   310→4. **`risk_flags`** — Populate from any high-severity findings:\n   311→   - `severity`: `\"low\"`, `\"medium\"`, or `\"high\"`\n   312→   - `description`: what the risk is\n   313→   - `mitigation`: recommended mitigation (if known)\n   314→\n   315→5. **`decisions`** — Populate from any scope or approach decisions made during the review:\n   316→   - `description`: what was decided\n   317→   - `rationale`: why\n   318→   - `alternatives_considered`: other options evaluated (optional)\n   319→   - `source`: `\"[Wazir]\"`, `\"[Codex]\"`, or `\"[Both]\"` (optional)\n   320→\n   321→6. **`verdict_recommendation`** — Set based on the gating rules in `config/gating-rules.yaml`:\n   322→   - `verdict`: `\"continue\"` (PASS), `\"loop_back\"` (NEEDS MINOR FIXES / NEEDS REWORK), or `\"escalate\"` (FAIL with fundamental issues)\n   323→   - `reasoning`: brief explanation of why this verdict was chosen\n   324→\n   325→### Report Output Paths\n   326→\n   327→Save reports to two formats under the run directory:\n   328→- `.wazir/runs/<id>/reports/phase-<name>-report.json` — machine-readable, validated against `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`\n   329→- `.wazir/runs/<id>/reports/phase-<name>-report.md` — human-readable Markdown summary\n   330→\n   331→The gating agent (`tooling/src/gating/agent.js`) consumes the JSON report to decide: **continue**, **loop_back**, or **escalate**.\n   332→\n   333→### Report Fields Reference\n   334→\n   335→All required fields per `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`:\n   336→\n   337→| Field | Type | Required | Description |\n   338→|-------|------|----------|-------------|\n   339→| `phase_name` | string | yes | Review mode name (e.g., `\"final\"`, `\"task-review\"`) |\n   340→| `run_id` | string | yes | Current run identifier |\n   341→| `timestamp` | string (date-time) | yes | ISO 8601 timestamp of report generation |\n   342→| `attempted_actions` | array | yes | Findings mapped to action outcomes |\n   343→| `drift_analysis` | object | yes | Spec-vs-implementation drift summary |\n   344→| `quality_metrics` | object | yes | Test/lint/type results |\n   345→| `risk_flags` | array | yes | High-severity risk items |\n   346→| `decisions` | array | yes | Scope/approach decisions made |\n   347→| `verdict_recommendation` | object | no | Gating verdict based on `config/gating-rules.yaml` |\n   348→\n   349→## Post-Review: Learn (final mode only)\n   350→\n   351→After the final review verdict, extract durable learnings using the **learner role** (`roles/learner.md`).\n   352→\n   353→### Step 1: Gather all findings\n   354→\n   355→Collect review findings from ALL sources in this run:\n   356→- `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/reviews/` — all review pass logs (task-review, final review)\n   357→- Codex findings (attributed `[Codex]` or `[Both]`)\n   358→- Self-audit findings (if `run_audit` was enabled)\n   359→\n   360→### Step 2: Identify learning candidates\n   361→\n   362→A finding becomes a learning candidate if:\n   363→- It recurred across 2+ review passes within this run (same issue found repeatedly)\n   364→- It matches a finding from a prior run (check `memory/learnings/proposed/` and `accepted/` for similar patterns)\n   365→- It represents a class of mistake, not just a single instance (e.g., \"missing error handling in async functions\" vs \"missing try-catch on line 42\")\n   366→\n   367→### Step 3: Write learning proposals\n   368→\n   369→For each candidate, write a proposal to `memory/learnings/proposed/<run-id>-<NNN>.md`:\n   370→\n   371→```markdown\n   372→---\n   373→artifact_type: proposed_learning\n   374→phase: learn\n   375→role: learner\n   376→run_id: <run-id>\n   377→status: proposed\n   378→sources:\n   379→  - <review-file-1>\n   380→  - <review-file-2>\n   381→approval_status: required\n   382→---\n   383→\n   384→# Proposed Learning: <title>\n   385→\n   386→## Scope\n   387→- **Roles:** [which roles should receive this learning — e.g., executor, reviewer]\n   388→- **Stacks:** [which tech stacks — e.g., node, react, or \"all\"]\n   389→- **Concerns:** [which concerns — e.g., error-handling, testing, security]\n   390→\n   391→## Evidence\n   392→- [finding from review pass N: description]\n   393→- [finding from review pass M: same pattern]\n   394→- [optional: similar finding from prior run <run-id>]\n   395→\n   396→## Learning\n   397→[The concrete, actionable instruction that should be injected into future executor context]\n   398→\n   399→## Expected Benefit\n   400→[What this prevents in future runs]\n   401→\n   402→## Confidence\n   403→- **Level:** low | medium | high\n   404→- **Basis:** [single run observation | multi-run recurrence | user correction]\n   405→```\n   406→\n   407→### Step 4: Report\n   408→\n   409→Present proposed learnings to the user:\n   410→\n   411→> **Learnings proposed:** [count]\n   412→> - [title 1] (confidence: high, scope: executor/node)\n   413→> - [title 2] (confidence: medium, scope: reviewer/all)\n   414→>\n   415→> Proposals saved to `memory/learnings/proposed/`. Review and accept with `/wazir audit learnings`.\n   416→\n   417→Learnings are NEVER auto-applied. They require explicit user acceptance before being injected into future runs.\n   418→\n   419→## Post-Review: Prepare Next (final mode only)\n   420→\n   421→After learning extraction, invoke the `prepare-next` skill to prepare the handoff:\n   422→\n   423→### Handoff document\n   424→\n   425→Write to `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/handoff.md`:\n   426→\n   427→```markdown\n   428→# Handoff — <run-id>\n   429→\n   430→**Status:** [Completed | Partial]\n   431→**Branch:** <branch-name>\n   432→**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD\n   433→\n   434→## What Was Done\n   435→[List of completed tasks with commit hashes]\n   436→\n   437→## Test Results\n   438→[Test count, pass/fail, validator status]\n   439→\n   440→## Review Score\n   441→[Final review verdict and score]\n   442→\n   443→## What's Next\n   444→[Pending items, deferred work, follow-up tasks]\n   445→\n   446→## Open Bugs\n   447→[Any known issues discovered during this run]\n   448→\n   449→## Learnings From This Run\n   450→[Key insights — what worked, what didn't, what to change]\n   451→```\n   452→\n   453→### Cleanup\n   454→\n   455→- Archive verbose intermediate review logs (compress to summary)\n   456→- Update `.wazir/runs/latest` symlink if creating a new run\n   457→- Do NOT mutate `input/` — it belongs to the user\n   458→- Do NOT auto-load proposed learnings into the next run\n   459→\n   460→## Reasoning Output\n   461→\n   462→Throughout the reviewer phase, produce reasoning at two layers:\n   463→\n   464→### User Output: Before Review\n   465→\n   466→```\n   467→Running [N]-dimension adversarial review against the original input.\n   468→Why: without this, implementation drift from your request ships undetected.\n   469→Checking: [dimension list]\n   470→```\n   471→\n   472→### User Output: Per Dimension\n   473→\n   474→```\n   475→[Dimension]: [score]/10 — [specific reason citing evidence from the code]\n   476→```\n   477→\n   478→### User Output: After Review\n   479→\n   480→```\n   481→Review complete. Verdict: [PASS/FAIL] ([score]/[max])\n   482→[N] findings across [M] dimensions.\n   483→Most critical: [top finding summary]\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→**File (Layer 2):** Write `.wazir/runs/<id>/reasoning/phase-reviewer-reasoning.md` with structured entries:\n   487→- **Trigger** — what prompted the finding (e.g., \"diff adds SQL query without parameterization\")\n   488→- **Options considered** — severity options, fix approaches\n   489→- **Chosen** — assigned severity and recommendation\n   490→- **Reasoning** — why this severity level\n   491→- **Confidence** — high/medium/low\n   492→- **Counterfactual** — what would ship if this finding were missed\n   493→\n   494→Key reviewer reasoning moments: severity assignments, PASS/FAIL decisions, dimension score justifications, and escalation decisions.\n   495→\n   496→## Done\n   497→\n   498→**After completing this phase, output to the user:**\n   499→\n   500→> **Final Review complete.**\n   501→>\n   502→> **Found:** [N] findings across 9 dimensions — [N] blocking, [N] warnings, [N] notes. Score: [score]/90 ([VERDICT]).\n   503→>\n   504→> **Without this phase:** [N] blocking issues would have shipped — including [specific examples: e.g., \"missing error handler on /api/users endpoint\", \"auth middleware not wired to 3 routes\", \"CHANGELOG missing entry for breaking API change\"]\n   505→>\n   506→> **Changed because of this work:** [List of issues caught and fixed during review passes, score improvement from first to final pass]\n   507→\n   508→Present the verdict and offer next steps:\n   509→\n   510→> **Review complete: [VERDICT] ([score]/90)**\n   511→>\n   512→> [Score breakdown and findings summary]\n   513→>\n   514→> **Learnings proposed:** [count] (see `memory/learnings/proposed/`)\n   515→> **Handoff:** `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/handoff.md`\n   516→\n   517→Ask the user via AskUserQuestion:\n   518→- **Question:** \"How would you like to proceed with the review results?\"\n   519→- **Options:**\n   520→  1. \"Create a PR\" *(Recommended if PASS)*\n   521→  2. \"Auto-fix and re-review\" *(Recommended if MINOR FIXES)*\n   522→  3. \"Review findings in detail\"\n   523→\n   524→Wait for the user's selection before continuing.\n   525→"}]},"uuid":"1b9c0dfc-d59a-4ffa-bcd8-9b427011851c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:29.620Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"bf65224f-0e85-4478-add7-e53ea16b423b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1b9c0dfc-d59a-4ffa-bcd8-9b427011851c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","toolUseID":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:39.884Z","uuid":"621ded34-7340-4e18-8aab-7ddaf6e9adea","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"65fa7f1e-e7a3-43f9-9f39-a2a31178d24e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01X3L3WP3EBruEGd9T3UvYT5","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Review Loop Pattern Reference\n     2→\n     3→Canonical reference for the review loop pattern used across all Wazir pipeline phases. Skills and workflows link to this document rather than embedding loop logic inline.\n     4→\n     5→---\n     6→\n     7→## Core Principle: Producer-Reviewer Separation\n     8→\n     9→The producer skill (clarifier, planner, designer, etc.) **emits** an artifact and calls for review. The **reviewer role** owns the review loop. The producer receives findings and resolves them. No role reviews its own output.\n    10→\n    11→```\n    12→Producer emits artifact\n    13→  -> Reviewer runs review loop (N passes, Codex if available)\n    14→  -> Findings returned to producer\n    15→  -> Producer fixes and resubmits\n    16→  -> Loop until all passes exhausted or cap reached\n    17→  -> Escalate to user if cap exceeded\n    18→```\n    19→\n    20→When Codex is available, the reviewer role delegates to `codex review` as a secondary input while maintaining its own independent primary verdict.\n    21→\n    22→---\n    23→\n    24→## Per-Task Review vs Final Review\n    25→\n    26→These are two structurally different constructs:\n    27→\n    28→| | Per-Task Review | Final Review |\n    29→|---|---|---|\n    30→| **When** | During execution, after each task | After all execution + verification complete |\n    31→| **Dimensions** | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | 9 scored dims (correctness, completeness, wiring, verification, drift, quality, documentation, intent alignment, scope coverage) |\n    32→| **Scope** | Single task's uncommitted changes | Entire implementation vs spec/plan |\n    33→| **Output** | Pass/fix loop, no score | Scored verdict (0-90), PASS/FAIL |\n    34→| **Workflow** | Inline in execution flow | `workflows/review.md` |\n    35→| **Skill** | `wz:reviewer` in `task-review` mode | `wz:reviewer` in `final` mode |\n    36→| **Log filename** | `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` | `final-review.md` |\n    37→\n    38→---\n    39→\n    40→## Standalone Mode\n    41→\n    42→When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` directory exists (standalone skill invocation outside a pipeline run):\n    43→\n    44→1. **Review loops still run** -- the review logic is embedded in the skill, not dependent on run state.\n    45→2. **Artifact location** -- artifacts live in `docs/plans/`. This is the canonical standalone artifact path.\n    46→3. **Review log location** -- review logs go alongside the artifact: `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md`. No temp dir.\n    47→4. **Loop cap is SKIPPED entirely** -- no `wazir capture loop-check` call. The loop runs for exactly `pass_counts[depth]` passes (3/5/7) and stops. No cap guard, no fallback constant.\n    48→5. **`wazir capture loop-check`** -- not invoked in standalone mode. The standalone detection happens before the cap guard call.\n    49→\n    50→Detection logic:\n    51→\n    52→```\n    53→if .wazir/runs/latest/ exists:\n    54→  run_mode = \"pipeline\"\n    55→  log_dir = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/\n    56→  cap_guard = wazir capture loop-check (full guard)\n    57→else:\n    58→  run_mode = \"standalone\"\n    59→  artifact_dir = docs/plans/\n    60→  log_dir = docs/plans/  (alongside artifact)\n    61→  cap_guard = none (depth pass count is the only limit)\n    62→```\n    63→\n    64→---\n    65→\n    66→## Review Loop Pseudocode\n    67→\n    68→```\n    69→review_loop(artifact_path, phase, dimensions[], depth, config, options={}):\n    70→\n    71→  # options.mode      -- explicit review mode (required)\n    72→  # options.task_id   -- task identifier for task-scoped reviews (optional)\n    73→\n    74→  # Standalone detection\n    75→  run_mode = detect_run_mode()  # \"pipeline\" or \"standalone\"\n    76→\n    77→  # Fixed pass counts -- no extension\n    78→  pass_counts = { quick: 3, standard: 5, deep: 7 }\n    79→  total_passes = pass_counts[depth]\n    80→\n    81→  # Depth-aware dimension subsets (coverage contract)\n    82→  depth_dimensions = {\n    83→    quick:    dimensions[0:3],     # first 3 dimensions only\n    84→    standard: dimensions[0:5],     # first 5\n    85→    deep:     dimensions,          # all available\n    86→  }\n    87→  active_dims = depth_dimensions[depth]\n    88→\n    89→  codex_available = check_codex()  # which codex && codex --version\n    90→\n    91→  for pass_number in 0..total_passes-1:\n    92→\n    93→    # --- Cap guard check (pipeline mode only, before each pass) ---\n    94→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n    95→      loop_check_args = \"--run <run-id> --phase <phase> --loop-count <pass_number+1>\"\n    96→      if options.task_id:\n    97→        loop_check_args += \" --task-id <task_id>\"\n    98→      wazir capture loop-check $loop_check_args\n    99→      # loop-check wraps: event capture + evaluateLoopCapGuard\n   100→      # If loop_cap_guard fires (exit 43), stop immediately:\n   101→      if last_exit_code == 43:\n   102→        log(\"Loop cap reached for phase: <phase>. Escalating to user.\")\n   103→        escalate_to_user(evidence_gathered_so_far)\n   104→        return { pass_count: pass_number, escalated: true }\n   105→    # Standalone mode: no cap guard. Loop runs for total_passes and stops.\n   106→\n   107→    dimension = active_dims[pass_number % len(active_dims)]\n   108→\n   109→    # --- Primary review (reviewer role, not producer) ---\n   110→    # Mode is always explicit -- passed by caller via options.mode\n   111→    findings = self_review(artifact_path, focus=dimension, mode=options.mode)\n   112→\n   113→    # --- Secondary review (Codex, if available) ---\n   114→    if codex_available:\n   115→      codex_exit_code, codex_output = run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension)\n   116→      if codex_exit_code != 0:\n   117→        # Codex failed -- log error, fall back to self-review for this pass\n   118→        log_error(\"Codex exited \" + codex_exit_code + \": \" + codex_output.stderr)\n   119→        mark_pass_codex_unavailable(pass_number)\n   120→        # Do NOT treat Codex failure as clean. Self-review findings stand alone.\n   121→      else:\n   122→        codex_findings = parse(codex_output.stdout)\n   123→        merge(findings, codex_findings, preserve_attribution=true)\n   124→\n   125→    # --- Log the review pass ---\n   126→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n   127→      if options.task_id:\n   128→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-task-<task_id>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   129→      else:\n   130→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   131→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   132→    else:\n   133→      log_path = docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   134→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   135→\n   136→    if findings.has_issues:\n   137→      # --- Fix and re-submit (MANDATORY) ---\n   138→      # The producer MUST fix findings and the reviewer MUST re-review.\n   139→      # \"Fix and continue without re-review\" is EXPLICITLY PROHIBITED.\n   140→      producer_fix(artifact_path, findings)\n   141→      # Continue to next pass -- the fix will be re-reviewed\n   142→\n   143→  # --- Post-loop: escalation if issues remain ---\n   144→  if remaining.has_issues:\n   145→    # Cap reached with unresolved findings. Present to user:\n   146→    # 1. Approve with known issues (Recommended if non-blocking)\n   147→    # 2. Fix manually and re-run\n   148→    # 3. Abort\n   149→    escalate_to_user(remaining, options=[\n   150→      \"approve-with-issues\",\n   151→      \"fix-manually-and-rerun\",\n   152→      \"abort\"\n   153→    ])\n   154→    # User decides. If approved, log \"user-approved-with-issues\" in final pass file.\n   155→\n   156→  return { pass_count: total_passes, issues_found, issues_fixed, remaining, attributions }\n   157→```\n   158→\n   159→Key properties of this pseudocode:\n   160→\n   161→1. **Fixed pass counts** -- Quick is exactly 3, standard exactly 5, deep exactly 7. No `max_passes = min_passes + 3`. No clean-streak early-exit. No extension.\n   162→2. **Task-scoped log filenames** -- `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` for per-task reviews, preventing log clobbering in parallel mode.\n   163→3. **Task-scoped loop cap keys** -- `--task-id` flag on `loop-check` so each task gets its own counter in `phase_loop_counts`.\n   164→4. **Explicit review mode** -- `options.mode` is always passed by the caller. No auto-detection.\n   165→5. **Codex error handling** -- non-zero exit is logged, pass marked `codex-unavailable`, self-review findings used alone. Never treated as clean.\n   166→6. **Standalone mode** -- uses `docs/plans/` for artifacts and logs. No temp dir. No cap guard at all.\n   167→\n   168→---\n   169→\n   170→## Codex Error Handling Contract\n   171→\n   172→```\n   173→run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension):\n   174→  CODEX_MODEL = read_config('.wazir/state/config.json', '.multi_tool.codex.model') or \"gpt-5.4\"\n   175→\n   176→  if is_code_artifact:\n   177→    cmd = codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"...\" \"Review for [dimension]...\"\n   178→    # or: codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <sha> for committed changes\n   179→  else:\n   180→    cmd = cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this [type] for [dimension]...\"\n   181→\n   182→  result = execute(cmd, timeout=120s, capture_stderr=true)\n   183→\n   184→  if result.exit_code != 0:\n   185→    return (result.exit_code, { stderr: result.stderr, stdout: \"\" })\n   186→    # Caller handles: log error, mark codex-unavailable, use self-review only\n   187→\n   188→  return (0, { stdout: result.stdout, stderr: result.stderr })\n   189→```\n   190→\n   191→Rules:\n   192→\n   193→- If Codex exits non-zero, log the full stderr.\n   194→- Mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log metadata.\n   195→- Fall back to self-review for that pass only. Do not skip the pass.\n   196→- Do not retry Codex on the same pass. If Codex fails on pass 2, pass 3 still tries Codex (transient failures recover).\n   197→- Never treat a Codex failure as a clean review pass.\n   198→\n   199→---\n   200→\n   201→## Codex Availability Probe\n   202→\n   203→Before any Codex call, verify availability once at loop start:\n   204→\n   205→```bash\n   206→which codex >/dev/null 2>&1 && codex --version >/dev/null 2>&1\n   207→```\n   208→\n   209→If the probe fails, set `codex_available = false` for the entire loop. Fall back to self-review only. Never error out.\n   210→\n   211→Per-invocation failures (Codex available but a single call fails) are handled separately by the error contract above.\n   212→\n   213→---\n   214→\n   215→## Codex Artifact-Scoped Review\n   216→\n   217→Never use `codex review` for non-code artifacts (specs, plans, designs). Instead, pipe the artifact content via stdin:\n   218→\n   219→```bash\n   220→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   221→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   222→cat .wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md | \\\n   223→  codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this specification for: [dimension]. Be specific, cite sections. Say CLEAN if no issues.\" \\\n   224→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/spec-challenge-review-pass-N.md\n   225→```\n   226→\n   227→For code artifacts, use `codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted` (or `--base` for committed changes). See the next section for details.\n   228→\n   229→---\n   230→\n   231→## Code Review Scoping\n   232→\n   233→**Rule: review BEFORE commit.**\n   234→\n   235→For each task during execution:\n   236→\n   237→1. Implement the task (changes are uncommitted).\n   238→2. Review the uncommitted changes using the **5 task-execution dimensions** (NOT the 9 final-review dimensions):\n   239→   ```bash\n   240→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   241→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   242→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   243→     \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   244→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   245→   ```\n   246→3. Fix any findings (still uncommitted).\n   247→4. Re-review until all passes exhausted or cap reached.\n   248→5. **Only after review passes:** commit with conventional commit format.\n   249→\n   250→**If changes are already committed** (e.g., subagent workflow where the implementer subagent commits before review):\n   251→\n   252→```bash\n   253→# Capture the SHA before the task starts\n   254→PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n   255→\n   256→# ... subagent implements and commits ...\n   257→\n   258→# Review the committed changes against the pre-task baseline\n   259→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   260→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   261→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base $PRE_TASK_SHA --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   262→  \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   263→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   264→```\n   265→\n   266→---\n   267→\n   268→## Dimension Sets\n   269→\n   270→### Research Dimensions (5)\n   271→\n   272→1. **Coverage** -- all briefing topics researched\n   273→2. **Source quality** -- authoritative, current sources\n   274→3. **Relevance** -- research answers the actual questions\n   275→4. **Gaps** -- missing info that blocks later phases\n   276→5. **Contradictions** -- conflicting sources identified\n   277→\n   278→### Spec/Clarification Dimensions (5)\n   279→\n   280→1. **Completeness** -- all requirements covered\n   281→2. **Testability** -- each criterion verifiable\n   282→3. **Ambiguity** -- no dual-interpretation statements\n   283→4. **Assumptions** -- hidden assumptions explicit\n   284→5. **Scope creep** -- nothing beyond briefing\n   285→\n   286→### Design-Review Dimensions (5)\n   287→\n   288→Matches canonical `workflows/design-review.md`:\n   289→\n   290→1. **Spec coverage** -- does the design address every acceptance criterion with a visual component?\n   291→2. **Design-spec consistency** -- does the design introduce anything not in the spec? (scope creep check)\n   292→3. **Accessibility** -- color contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA), focus states, touch target sizes (44x44px minimum)\n   293→4. **Visual consistency** -- design tokens form a coherent system, dark/light mode alignment\n   294→5. **Exported-code fidelity** -- do exported scaffolds match the designs? Mismatches are failures here, not implementation concerns.\n   295→\n   296→### Plan Dimensions (8)\n   297→\n   298→1. **Completeness** -- all design decisions mapped to tasks\n   299→2. **Ordering** -- dependencies correct, parallelizable identified\n   300→3. **Atomicity** -- each task fits one session\n   301→4. **Testability** -- concrete verification per task\n   302→5. **Edge cases** -- error paths covered\n   303→6. **Security** -- auth, injection, data exposure\n   304→7. **Integration** -- tasks connect end-to-end\n   305→8. **Input Coverage** -- every distinct item in the original input maps to at least one task. If `tasks < input items`, HIGH finding listing missing items\n   306→\n   307→### Task Execution Dimensions (5)\n   308→\n   309→Used for per-task review during execution:\n   310→\n   311→1. **Correctness** -- code matches spec\n   312→2. **Tests** -- real tests, not mocked/faked\n   313→3. **Wiring** -- all paths connected\n   314→4. **Drift** -- matches task spec\n   315→5. **Quality** -- naming, error handling\n   316→\n   317→### Final Review Dimensions (9)\n   318→\n   319→Used for `workflows/review.md` scored gate:\n   320→\n   321→1. **Correctness** -- does the code do what the spec says?\n   322→2. **Completeness** -- are all acceptance criteria met?\n   323→3. **Wiring** -- are all paths connected end-to-end?\n   324→4. **Verification** -- is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim?\n   325→5. **Drift** -- does the implementation match the approved plan?\n   326→6. **Quality** -- code style, naming, error handling, security\n   327→7. **Documentation** -- changelog entries, commit messages, comments\n   328→8. **Intent Alignment** -- does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec. Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction.\n   329→9. **Scope Coverage** -- count distinct items in the original input vs items implemented. Flag missing items as HIGH. Score = (implemented / input items) * 10.\n   330→\n   331→The final review dimensions are the existing 9 from `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`. `workflows/review.md` is not modified by this pattern.\n   332→\n   333→---\n   334→\n   335→## Per-Depth Coverage Contract\n   336→\n   337→| Depth | Research | Spec | Design-Review | Plan | Task Execution | Final Review |\n   338→|-------|----------|------|---------------|------|----------------|--------------|\n   339→| Quick | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   340→| Standard | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   341→| Deep | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-7, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   342→\n   343→Pass counts are FIXED per depth. Quick = 3 passes, standard = 5 passes, deep = 7 passes. No extension. No early-exit. Final review is always a single scored pass across all 9 dimensions -- it is a gate, not a loop.\n   344→\n   345→---\n   346→\n   347→## Loop Cap Configuration\n   348→\n   349→The `workflow_policy` section of `run-config.yaml` (legacy: `phase_policy`) controls which workflows are enabled and sets an absolute safety ceiling per workflow. Only two fields exist: `enabled` and `loop_cap`. There is no `passes` field -- depth determines pass counts (3/5/7), not workflow policy.\n   350→\n   351→```yaml\n   352→workflow_policy:\n   353→  # Clarifier phase workflows\n   354→  discover:       { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   355→  clarify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   356→  specify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   357→  spec-challenge: { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   358→  author:         { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   359→  design:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   360→  design-review:  { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   361→  plan:           { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   362→  plan-review:    { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   363→  # Executor phase workflows\n   364→  execute:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   365→  verify:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   366→  review:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   367→  learn:          { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   368→  prepare_next:   { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   369→  run_audit:      { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   370→```\n   371→\n   372→**`loop_cap`** is an absolute safety ceiling that prevents runaway loops regardless of depth. It is checked by `wazir capture loop-check` in pipeline mode. It is NOT the same as pass count (which is determined by depth: 3/5/7). Example: depth=deep gives 7 passes, but if `loop_cap: 5`, the cap guard fires at pass 5 and escalates. This is intentional -- the operator can constrain expensive phases.\n   373→\n   374→**Adaptive workflows** (`author`, `run_audit`) default to `enabled: false`. They are activated by explicit operator config or intent detection.\n   375→\n   376→**Post-run workflows** (`learn`, `prepare_next`) default to `enabled: true`. They run as part of the Final Review phase:\n   377→\n   378→- `learn` extracts durable learnings from review findings -- recurring findings become accepted learnings.\n   379→- `prepare_next` prepares context and handoff for the next run.\n   380→- `author` has a human approval gate, not an iterative review loop.\n   381→- `run_audit` is an on-demand standalone audit, not part of the main pipeline flow.\n   382→\n   383→---\n   384→\n   385→## Reviewer Mode Table\n   386→\n   387→The reviewer skill operates in different modes depending on the phase. **Mode is always explicit** -- the caller passes `--mode <mode>`. There is no auto-detection based on artifact availability.\n   388→\n   389→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n   390→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n   391→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts in `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Verdict: PASS/NEEDS FIXES/NEEDS REWORK/FAIL |\n   392→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   393→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec, accessibility guidelines | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Findings with severity (blocking/advisory) |\n   394→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan, approved spec, design artifact | 7 plan dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   395→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes (or committed with known base SHA) | 5 task-execution dims | Pass/fail per task, no score |\n   396→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   397→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   398→\n   399→If `--mode` is not provided, the reviewer asks the user which review to run. Auto-detection based on artifact availability is NOT used -- it causes ambiguity in resumed/multi-phase runs where stale artifacts from prior phases exist.\n   400→\n   401→Each caller is responsible for passing the correct mode:\n   402→\n   403→- Clarifier passes `--mode clarification-review` after Phase 1A\n   404→- Discover workflow passes `--mode research-review` after research\n   405→- Specifier flow passes `--mode spec-challenge` after specify\n   406→- Brainstorming passes `--mode design-review` after user approval\n   407→- Writing-plans passes `--mode plan-review` after planning\n   408→- Executor passes `--mode task-review` for each task\n   409→- `/wazir` runner passes `--mode final` for the final review gate\n   410→\n   411→---\n   412→\n   413→## Codex Prompt Templates\n   414→\n   415→All Codex invocations read the model from config with a fallback:\n   416→\n   417→```bash\n   418→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   419→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   420→```\n   421→\n   422→### Artifact Review (specs, plans, designs via stdin)\n   423→\n   424→Use this template with `codex exec` for non-code artifacts piped via stdin:\n   425→\n   426→```bash\n   427→cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \\\n   428→  \"You are reviewing a [ARTIFACT_TYPE] for the Wazir engineering OS.\n   429→Focus on [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   430→Rules: cite specific sections, be actionable, say CLEAN if no issues.\n   431→Do NOT load or invoke any skills. Do NOT read the codebase.\n   432→Review ONLY the content provided via stdin.\"\n   433→```\n   434→\n   435→Replace `[ARTIFACT_TYPE]` with: `specification`, `implementation plan`, `design document`, `research brief`, or `clarification`.\n   436→Replace `[DIMENSION]` and `[dimension description]` with the current review pass dimension from the relevant dimension set above.\n   437→\n   438→### Code Review (diffs via --uncommitted or --base)\n   439→\n   440→Use this template with `codex review` for code changes:\n   441→\n   442→```bash\n   443→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   444→  \"Review the code changes for [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   445→Check against acceptance criteria: [criteria].\n   446→Flag: correctness issues, missing tests, unwired paths, drift from spec.\n   447→Do NOT load or invoke any skills.\"\n   448→```\n   449→\n   450→For committed changes, replace `--uncommitted` with `--base <sha>`.\n   451→Replace `[DIMENSION]`, `[dimension description]`, and `[criteria]` with the task-specific values from the execution plan and spec.\n   452→\n   453→---\n   454→\n   455→## Codex Output Context Protection\n   456→\n   457→Codex CLI output includes internal traces (file reads, tool calls, reasoning) that are NOT useful for the review — only the final findings matter. To prevent context flooding:\n   458→\n   459→### Tee + Extract Pattern\n   460→\n   461→1. **Always tee** Codex output to a file:\n   462→   ```bash\n   463→   codex exec ... 2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   464→   ```\n   465→\n   466→2. **Extract findings** after the last `codex` marker using `execute_file`:\n   467→   ```bash\n   468→   # If context-mode available (has_execute_file: true):\n   469→   mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute_file(\n   470→     path: \".wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\",\n   471→     language: \"shell\",\n   472→     code: \"tac $FILE | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\"\n   473→   )\n   474→   ```\n   475→\n   476→3. **Present extracted findings only** — the raw trace stays in the file for debugging but never enters the main context window.\n   477→\n   478→### Fallback (no context-mode)\n   479→\n   480→If `context_mode.has_execute_file` is false, extract using shell directly:\n   481→\n   482→```bash\n   483→tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→This reverses the file, finds the first (= last original) `codex` marker, reverses back, and skips the marker line.\n   487→\n   488→**If no marker found:** fail closed\n   489→\n   490→---\n   491→\n   492→## Phase Scoring: First vs Final Artifact Comparison\n   493→\n   494→At the start of each review loop (pass 1), score the artifact on its phase's canonical dimension set (1-10 per dimension). At the end of the loop (final pass), score again using the **same canonical dimensions**. Present the delta in the end-of-phase report.\n   495→\n   496→### Canonical Dimension Sets Per Phase\n   497→\n   498→These are the fixed rubrics — no ad-hoc dimension selection:\n   499→\n   500→| Phase | Canonical Dimensions |\n   501→|-------|---------------------|\n   502→| research-review | Coverage, Source quality, Relevance, Gaps identified, Actionability |\n   503→| clarification-review / spec-challenge | Completeness, Testability, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Scope creep |\n   504→| design-review | Spec coverage, Design-spec consistency, Accessibility, Visual consistency, Exported-code fidelity |\n   505→| plan-review | Completeness, Testability, Task granularity, Dependency correctness, Phase structure, File coverage, Estimation accuracy, Input coverage |\n   506→| task-review | Correctness, Tests, Wiring, Drift, Quality |\n   507→| final | Correctness, Completeness, Wiring, Verification, Drift, Quality, Documentation, Intent Alignment, Scope Coverage |\n   508→\n   509→### Scoring Rules\n   510→\n   511→1. Initial and final scores MUST use the **same dimension set** — the delta is only meaningful on the same rubric.\n   512→2. The reviewer records which dimension set was used in each pass file.\n   513→3. Delta format: `Dimension: X/10 → Y/10 (+Z)`.\n   514→\n   515→### Quality Delta Report Section\n   516→\n   517→The end-of-phase report (see \"End-of-Phase Report\" below) includes a **Quality Delta** section:\n   518→\n   519→```markdown\n   520→## Quality Delta\n   521→\n   522→| Dimension | Initial | Final | Delta |\n   523→|-----------|---------|-------|-------|\n   524→| Completeness | 4/10 | 9/10 | +5 |\n   525→| Testability | 3/10 | 8/10 | +5 |\n   526→| Ambiguity | 5/10 | 9/10 | +4 |\n   527→```\n   528→\n   529→---\n   530→\n   531→## End-of-Phase Report\n   532→\n   533→Every phase exit produces a report saved to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-report.md` containing:\n   534→\n   535→1. **Summary** — what the phase produced\n   536→2. **Key Changes** — first-version vs final-version highlights (not full diff — what improved)\n   537→3. **Quality Delta** — per-dimension before/after scores (see Phase Scoring above)\n   538→4. **Findings Log** — per-pass finding counts by severity (e.g., \"Pass 1: 6 findings (3 blocking, 2 warning, 1 note). Pass 7: 0 findings. All resolved.\")\n   539→5. **Usage** — token usage from `wazir capture usage` (runs before report generation)\n   540→6. **Context Savings** — context-mode stats if available, omit section if not\n   541→7. **Time Spent** — wall-clock elapsed time from phase start to end — log \"codex marker not found in output, cannot extract findings\" and present a warning to the user with 0 findings extracted. The raw file is preserved for manual review. Do NOT fall back to `tail` or any best-effort extraction that could leak traces into context.\n   542→"}]},"uuid":"e6f5930f-4128-4fc4-a3bb-3bf61d7611c5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:39.884Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"65fa7f1e-e7a3-43f9-9f39-a2a31178d24e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e6f5930f-4128-4fc4-a3bb-3bf61d7611c5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01JxUojbYESjtMU3mmcxEiZ3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me check the existing gating rules, security patterns, and the learning system to understand the full picture."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":20998,"cache_read_input_tokens":11907,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":20998,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERN1aDGY3ni89yorx9S","type":"assistant","uuid":"e61bb64e-8deb-44df-b1c2-d00fd6ff1a34","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.094Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e61bb64e-8deb-44df-b1c2-d00fd6ff1a34","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01JxUojbYESjtMU3mmcxEiZ3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01KTeXPncxFMG339344BB5pv","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"**/gating*"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":20998,"cache_read_input_tokens":11907,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":20998,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERN1aDGY3ni89yorx9S","type":"assistant","uuid":"d61cc9a1-f47e-496a-971a-4a62e718e23c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.613Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d61cc9a1-f47e-496a-971a-4a62e718e23c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01JxUojbYESjtMU3mmcxEiZ3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_019QjCNdDANm8zbTjdciy7SR","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"**/security-sensitivity*"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":20998,"cache_read_input_tokens":11907,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":20998,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERN1aDGY3ni89yorx9S","type":"assistant","uuid":"68e44db3-15ee-4e71-8433-f6e5a9ba6ac0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.616Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"68e44db3-15ee-4e71-8433-f6e5a9ba6ac0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01KTeXPncxFMG339344BB5pv","toolUseID":"toolu_01KTeXPncxFMG339344BB5pv","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.770Z","uuid":"5fdc38d7-5c09-418d-a99f-b2b76702f677","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d61cc9a1-f47e-496a-971a-4a62e718e23c","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01KTeXPncxFMG339344BB5pv","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/config/gating-rules.yaml"}]},"uuid":"420067e7-21b5-4854-949f-894a5192fb75","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.770Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"d61cc9a1-f47e-496a-971a-4a62e718e23c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"420067e7-21b5-4854-949f-894a5192fb75","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_019QjCNdDANm8zbTjdciy7SR","toolUseID":"toolu_019QjCNdDANm8zbTjdciy7SR","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.770Z","uuid":"0565ccea-cf67-44fc-ba6b-b693a3869b83","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"68e44db3-15ee-4e71-8433-f6e5a9ba6ac0","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_019QjCNdDANm8zbTjdciy7SR","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/test/checks/security-sensitivity.test.js"}]},"uuid":"57e2e1d7-316f-4041-9b0e-64d0548fbbd6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:56.769Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"68e44db3-15ee-4e71-8433-f6e5a9ba6ac0","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"57e2e1d7-316f-4041-9b0e-64d0548fbbd6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01JxUojbYESjtMU3mmcxEiZ3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01YST2sxWwhmn13rcp19tNpE","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"**/antipatterns/**"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":20998,"cache_read_input_tokens":11907,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":20998,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERN1aDGY3ni89yorx9S","type":"assistant","uuid":"321c89af-41ee-4537-a46a-05c493d1abc2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.047Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"321c89af-41ee-4537-a46a-05c493d1abc2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01YST2sxWwhmn13rcp19tNpE","toolUseID":"toolu_01YST2sxWwhmn13rcp19tNpE","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.150Z","uuid":"8088cba4-53e2-495d-ba45-41cee738f86d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"321c89af-41ee-4537-a46a-05c493d1abc2","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01YST2sxWwhmn13rcp19tNpE","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/design/accessibility-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/design/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/spa-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/react-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/css-layout-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/flutter-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/frontend/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/security/security-theater.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/security/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/security/vulnerability-patterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/security/secrets-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/PROGRESS.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/architecture-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/dependency-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/code-smells.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/testing-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/error-handling-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/state-management-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/naming-and-abstraction.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/code/async-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/auth-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/microservices-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/backend/caching-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/performance/scaling-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/performance/premature-optimization.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/performance/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/deployment-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/technical-debt-antipatterns.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/index.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md"}]},"uuid":"d2ed59f4-6606-4060-887f-1e3806dfe7b4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.150Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"321c89af-41ee-4537-a46a-05c493d1abc2","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d2ed59f4-6606-4060-887f-1e3806dfe7b4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01JxUojbYESjtMU3mmcxEiZ3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01JeAcYohKEv67rwMe1vre9q","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"**/learnings/**"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":20998,"cache_read_input_tokens":11907,"output_tokens":200,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":20998},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERN1aDGY3ni89yorx9S","type":"assistant","uuid":"75c4fdfd-2ac6-40c5-b4e8-6caf45999f4a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.237Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"75c4fdfd-2ac6-40c5-b4e8-6caf45999f4a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JeAcYohKEv67rwMe1vre9q","toolUseID":"toolu_01JeAcYohKEv67rwMe1vre9q","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.335Z","uuid":"d1789f98-75b2-4046-b63f-05b5c0db8397","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"75c4fdfd-2ac6-40c5-b4e8-6caf45999f4a","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01JeAcYohKEv67rwMe1vre9q","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/accepted/.gitkeep\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/archived/.gitkeep\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/.gitkeep\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260319-160838-001.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260319-160838-002.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260320-023639-001.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260320-023639-002.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260320-023639-003.md"}]},"uuid":"9834bb2c-49e5-4d4f-92cf-3fac775c195b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.335Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"75c4fdfd-2ac6-40c5-b4e8-6caf45999f4a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9834bb2c-49e5-4d4f-92cf-3fac775c195b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01FBAqJGszQU8aufhWnEV5V9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/config/gating-rules.yaml"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2038,"cache_read_input_tokens":32905,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2038,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":25,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXGBHzsTCLAnUHYW1v","type":"assistant","uuid":"4fd52073-b543-423d-b4e6-f5193be04219","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.767Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4fd52073-b543-423d-b4e6-f5193be04219","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","uuid":"e5612343-ca72-4b30-9261-79fa9bfb6c85","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.768Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e5612343-ca72-4b30-9261-79fa9bfb6c85","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","toolUseID":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.820Z","uuid":"5a4b513d-bb30-4db1-8b6c-8d18a2aa2c2a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4fd52073-b543-423d-b4e6-f5193be04219","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01FciH6kcfGRo6HViJKYvEx2","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Gating rules for phase transition decisions\n     2→# The gating agent applies these rules to phase reports\n     3→\n     4→schema_version: 1\n     5→\n     6→rules:\n     7→  continue:\n     8→    description: \"All quality gates pass, no drift, no open risks\"\n     9→    conditions:\n    10→      - field: quality_metrics.test_fail_count\n    11→        operator: eq\n    12→        value: 0\n    13→      - field: quality_metrics.lint_errors\n    14→        operator: eq\n    15→        value: 0\n    16→      - field: quality_metrics.type_errors\n    17→        operator: eq\n    18→        value: 0\n    19→      - field: drift_analysis.delta\n    20→        operator: eq\n    21→        value: 0\n    22→      - field: risk_flags\n    23→        operator: none_match\n    24→        match: { severity: \"high\" }\n    25→      - field: attempted_actions\n    26→        operator: none_match\n    27→        match: { outcome: \"uncertain\" }\n    28→\n    29→  loop_back:\n    30→    description: \"Specific failures with deterministic fix paths\"\n    31→    conditions:\n    32→      - field: quality_metrics.test_fail_count\n    33→        operator: gt\n    34→        value: 0\n    35→    # OR lint_errors > 0 OR type_errors > 0\n    36→    # Any deterministic failure triggers loop_back\n    37→\n    38→  escalate:\n    39→    description: \"Default when neither continue nor loop_back match\"\n    40→    # This is the fallback — always matches\n    41→    conditions: []\n    42→\n    43→default_verdict: escalate\n    44→"}]},"uuid":"7b78712e-bc9a-43ee-944f-b6e371944020","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.819Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"4fd52073-b543-423d-b4e6-f5193be04219","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7b78712e-bc9a-43ee-944f-b6e371944020","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01FBAqJGszQU8aufhWnEV5V9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2038,"cache_read_input_tokens":32905,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2038,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":25,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXGBHzsTCLAnUHYW1v","type":"assistant","uuid":"7a2bd5ae-f62f-45c0-b5d1-0eded44cd966","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.316Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7a2bd5ae-f62f-45c0-b5d1-0eded44cd966","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","uuid":"ff273f0e-b4f5-4047-bd77-8bb620f8cb40","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.317Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ff273f0e-b4f5-4047-bd77-8bb620f8cb40","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","toolUseID":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.368Z","uuid":"76ead52a-fd19-488c-ac96-ba88dce3962e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7a2bd5ae-f62f-45c0-b5d1-0eded44cd966","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01QYbG6mQfyap2mi1dvuPfjF","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→const SECURITY_PATTERNS = [\n     2→  'auth', 'password', 'passwd', 'token', 'query', 'sql',\n     3→  'fetch', 'upload', 'secret', 'env', 'api[._-]?key',\n     4→  'session', 'cookie', 'cors', 'csrf', 'jwt', 'oauth',\n     5→  'encrypt', 'decrypt', 'hash', 'salt', 'credential',\n     6→  'private[._-]?key', 'access[._-]?token', 'refresh[._-]?token',\n     7→];\n     8→\n     9→const PATTERN_REGEX = new RegExp(\n    10→  `\\\\b(${SECURITY_PATTERNS.join('|')})\\\\b`,\n    11→  'gi'\n    12→);\n    13→\n    14→/**\n    15→ * Scan diff text for security-sensitive patterns.\n    16→ * Returns which patterns were found and in which files.\n    17→ */\n    18→export function detectSecurityPatterns(diffText) {\n    19→  if (!diffText || typeof diffText !== 'string') {\n    20→    return { triggered: false, patterns: [], files: [] };\n    21→  }\n    22→\n    23→  const matchedPatterns = new Set();\n    24→  const matchedFiles = new Set();\n    25→  let currentFile = null;\n    26→\n    27→  for (const line of diffText.split('\\n')) {\n    28→    // Track current file from diff headers\n    29→    const fileMatch = line.match(/^(?:diff --git a\\/\\S+ b\\/|[+]{3} b\\/)(.+)/);\n    30→    if (fileMatch) {\n    31→      currentFile = fileMatch[1];\n    32→      continue;\n    33→    }\n    34→\n    35→    // Only scan added/modified lines (starting with +, not +++)\n    36→    if (!line.startsWith('+') || line.startsWith('+++')) continue;\n    37→\n    38→    const lineMatches = line.match(PATTERN_REGEX);\n    39→    if (lineMatches) {\n    40→      for (const m of lineMatches) {\n    41→        matchedPatterns.add(m.toLowerCase());\n    42→      }\n    43→      if (currentFile) {\n    44→        matchedFiles.add(currentFile);\n    45→      }\n    46→    }\n    47→  }\n    48→\n    49→  const patterns = [...matchedPatterns].sort();\n    50→  const files = [...matchedFiles].sort();\n    51→\n    52→  return {\n    53→    triggered: patterns.length > 0,\n    54→    patterns,\n    55→    files,\n    56→  };\n    57→}\n    58→\n    59→/**\n    60→ * Security review dimensions to add when patterns are detected.\n    61→ */\n    62→export const SECURITY_REVIEW_DIMENSIONS = [\n    63→  'Injection (SQL, command, template, header)',\n    64→  'Authentication bypass',\n    65→  'Data exposure (PII, secrets, tokens in logs/responses)',\n    66→  'CSRF / SSRF',\n    67→  'XSS (stored, reflected, DOM)',\n    68→  'Secrets leakage (hardcoded keys, env vars in client code)',\n    69→];\n    70→"}]},"uuid":"676c1a50-7f96-4bac-80aa-9979a20311ec","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.367Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"7a2bd5ae-f62f-45c0-b5d1-0eded44cd966","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"676c1a50-7f96-4bac-80aa-9979a20311ec","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01FBAqJGszQU8aufhWnEV5V9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/memory/learnings/proposed/run-20260320-023639-001.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2038,"cache_read_input_tokens":32905,"output_tokens":215,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2038},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXGBHzsTCLAnUHYW1v","type":"assistant","uuid":"f87bec72-e40d-4f7d-babe-3edea69a1b3d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.802Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f87bec72-e40d-4f7d-babe-3edea69a1b3d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","uuid":"5bac2aab-ed02-46c6-923e-4fed9316007a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.803Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5bac2aab-ed02-46c6-923e-4fed9316007a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","toolUseID":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.855Z","uuid":"8b2b4485-881b-40be-8f59-37e57be9d2e6","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f87bec72-e40d-4f7d-babe-3edea69a1b3d","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01WvSPffrT7P9HEXnsBGjwVF","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→scope_roles: [executor]\n     3→scope_stacks: [node, esm]\n     4→scope_concerns: [cli, warnings]\n     5→confidence: high\n     6→evidence: Codex P1 + fix in commit 322d431\n     7→---\n     8→\n     9→# ESM static imports are hoisted above top-level code\n    10→\n    11→When suppressing Node.js warnings in an ESM entrypoint, `process.emit` overrides placed before `import` statements still run AFTER imports because ESM hoists all static imports. Use dynamic `import()` for modules that trigger the warning, so the override is active when the module loads.\n    12→\n    13→**Recurrence:** First time, but affects any ESM CLI entrypoint.\n    14→"}]},"uuid":"6473e430-a9fa-4919-bd55-1a90b30cc651","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.855Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f87bec72-e40d-4f7d-babe-3edea69a1b3d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6473e430-a9fa-4919-bd55-1a90b30cc651","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EHpWDPyonSEdTyqmdZYcp9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me look at the state database schema to understand how findings are currently stored, and the existing code-review antipatterns for additional context."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2035,"cache_read_input_tokens":34943,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2035,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdredkiNuow5f4TGeM","type":"assistant","uuid":"10519890-0eef-4def-9d36-ac9c36db3678","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.663Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"10519890-0eef-4def-9d36-ac9c36db3678","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EHpWDPyonSEdTyqmdZYcp9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"insertFinding|finding_hash|CREATE TABLE.*finding","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2035,"cache_read_input_tokens":34943,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2035,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdredkiNuow5f4TGeM","type":"assistant","uuid":"ca50aedb-919e-4055-bc4f-557624bac0ee","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:31.602Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ca50aedb-919e-4055-bc4f-557624bac0ee","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","uuid":"7e330aa4-f7de-49f1-8373-7bf1ab0aa060","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:31.603Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7e330aa4-f7de-49f1-8373-7bf1ab0aa060","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","toolUseID":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:31.700Z","uuid":"ddf32bd9-c500-4034-bbec-e2c1efcbd9ce","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ca50aedb-919e-4055-bc4f-557624bac0ee","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01WMJ6B59smG97ppmyueioL9","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 5 files\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/state/db.test.js\ntooling/src/state/db.js\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md"}]},"uuid":"07dce5b1-df38-46cd-a86e-0fd9e76f7559","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:31.700Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ca50aedb-919e-4055-bc4f-557624bac0ee","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"07dce5b1-df38-46cd-a86e-0fd9e76f7559","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EHpWDPyonSEdTyqmdZYcp9","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01PuJrRD3omsf9vhvosR6sDH","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"**/state/db*"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2035,"cache_read_input_tokens":34943,"output_tokens":158,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2035},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdredkiNuow5f4TGeM","type":"assistant","uuid":"2b33aab8-368e-4a5d-89bb-31b07df4debd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:32.123Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2b33aab8-368e-4a5d-89bb-31b07df4debd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01PuJrRD3omsf9vhvosR6sDH","toolUseID":"toolu_01PuJrRD3omsf9vhvosR6sDH","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:32.228Z","uuid":"6a183c82-92a0-4cb3-a6e2-d39583b0e75b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2b33aab8-368e-4a5d-89bb-31b07df4debd","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01PuJrRD3omsf9vhvosR6sDH","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/test/state/db.test.js"}]},"uuid":"b0ba4737-c4a8-440d-bfaf-246395572dda","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:32.228Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2b33aab8-368e-4a5d-89bb-31b07df4debd","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b0ba4737-c4a8-440d-bfaf-246395572dda","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01LqRwVFmpPWx9u5gUspG7rT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":415,"cache_read_input_tokens":36978,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":415,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":26,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERf5AjQkV3TCuYJqUoT","type":"assistant","uuid":"465297d6-a5be-4d85-a055-3cf40f9949d3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.164Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"465297d6-a5be-4d85-a055-3cf40f9949d3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","parentToolUseID":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","uuid":"a99f1964-d908-4eef-b4d4-801e7c99b9c9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.168Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a99f1964-d908-4eef-b4d4-801e7c99b9c9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","toolUseID":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.260Z","uuid":"80117eb0-5485-4223-9bdc-e70e1392a90b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"465297d6-a5be-4d85-a055-3cf40f9949d3","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_014TRkThhVBCe56ZCyGjQGjh","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→import crypto from 'node:crypto';\n     2→import fs from 'node:fs';\n     3→import path from 'node:path';\n     4→import { DatabaseSync } from 'node:sqlite';\n     5→\n     6→function getStateDatabasePath(stateRoot) {\n     7→  return path.join(stateRoot, 'state', 'state.sqlite');\n     8→}\n     9→\n    10→function hashDescription(description) {\n    11→  return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(description).digest('hex');\n    12→}\n    13→\n    14→function ensureStateSchema(db) {\n    15→  db.exec(`\n    16→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS learnings (\n    17→      id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,\n    18→      source_run TEXT NOT NULL,\n    19→      category TEXT NOT NULL,\n    20→      scope_roles TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    21→      scope_stacks TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    22→      scope_concerns TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    23→      confidence TEXT DEFAULT 'medium' CHECK(confidence IN ('low','medium','high')),\n    24→      recurrence_count INTEGER DEFAULT 1,\n    25→      content TEXT NOT NULL,\n    26→      created_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),\n    27→      last_applied TEXT,\n    28→      expires_at TEXT\n    29→    );\n    30→\n    31→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS findings (\n    32→      id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,\n    33→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    34→      phase TEXT NOT NULL,\n    35→      source TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(source IN ('internal','codex','self-audit','gemini')),\n    36→      severity TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(severity IN ('critical','high','medium','low')),\n    37→      description TEXT NOT NULL,\n    38→      resolved INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    39→      finding_hash TEXT NOT NULL,\n    40→      created_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now'))\n    41→    );\n    42→\n    43→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS audit_history (\n    44→      id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,\n    45→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    46→      date TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (date('now')),\n    47→      finding_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    48→      fix_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    49→      manual_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    50→      quality_score_before REAL,\n    51→      quality_score_after REAL\n    52→    );\n    53→\n    54→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS usage_aggregate (\n    55→      id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,\n    56→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    57→      date TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (date('now')),\n    58→      tokens_saved INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    59→      bytes_avoided INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    60→      savings_ratio REAL DEFAULT 0.0,\n    61→      index_queries INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    62→      routing_decisions INTEGER DEFAULT 0\n    63→    );\n    64→\n    65→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_learnings_category ON learnings(category);\n    66→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_findings_run_id ON findings(run_id);\n    67→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_findings_finding_hash ON findings(finding_hash);\n    68→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_audit_history_run_id ON audit_history(run_id);\n    69→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_usage_aggregate_run_id ON usage_aggregate(run_id);\n    70→  `);\n    71→}\n    72→\n    73→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    74→// Database lifecycle\n    75→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    76→\n    77→export function openStateDb(stateRoot) {\n    78→  const databasePath = getStateDatabasePath(stateRoot);\n    79→  fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(databasePath), { recursive: true });\n    80→  const db = new DatabaseSync(databasePath, { timeout: 5000 });\n    81→  ensureStateSchema(db);\n    82→  return db;\n    83→}\n    84→\n    85→export function closeStateDb(db) {\n    86→  db.close();\n    87→}\n    88→\n    89→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    90→// Learnings CRUD\n    91→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    92→\n    93→export function insertLearning(db, record) {\n    94→  const id = crypto.randomUUID();\n    95→  const createdAt = new Date().toISOString();\n    96→\n    97→  db.prepare(`\n    98→    INSERT INTO learnings (id, source_run, category, scope_roles, scope_stacks, scope_concerns, confidence, content, created_at)\n    99→    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)\n   100→  `).run(\n   101→    id,\n   102→    record.source_run,\n   103→    record.category,\n   104→    record.scope_roles ?? '',\n   105→    record.scope_stacks ?? '',\n   106→    record.scope_concerns ?? '',\n   107→    record.confidence ?? 'medium',\n   108→    record.content,\n   109→    createdAt,\n   110→  );\n   111→\n   112→  return id;\n   113→}\n   114→\n   115→export function getLearningsByScope(db, filters = {}) {\n   116→  const conditions = [];\n   117→  const params = [];\n   118→\n   119→  if (filters.roles) {\n   120→    conditions.push(\"scope_roles LIKE ?\");\n   121→    params.push(`%${filters.roles}%`);\n   122→  }\n   123→\n   124→  if (filters.stacks) {\n   125→    conditions.push(\"scope_stacks LIKE ?\");\n   126→    params.push(`%${filters.stacks}%`);\n   127→  }\n   128→\n   129→  if (filters.concerns) {\n   130→    conditions.push(\"scope_concerns LIKE ?\");\n   131→    params.push(`%${filters.concerns}%`);\n   132→  }\n   133→\n   134→  if (filters.confidence) {\n   135→    conditions.push(\"confidence = ?\");\n   136→    params.push(filters.confidence);\n   137→  }\n   138→\n   139→  const where = conditions.length > 0 ? `WHERE ${conditions.join(' AND ')}` : '';\n   140→  const limit = filters.limit ? `LIMIT ${Number(filters.limit)}` : '';\n   141→\n   142→  return db.prepare(`\n   143→    SELECT * FROM learnings ${where} ORDER BY created_at DESC ${limit}\n   144→  `).all(...params);\n   145→}\n   146→\n   147→export function updateLearningRecurrence(db, id) {\n   148→  const now = new Date().toISOString();\n   149→\n   150→  db.prepare(`\n   151→    UPDATE learnings\n   152→    SET recurrence_count = recurrence_count + 1,\n   153→        last_applied = ?\n   154→    WHERE id = ?\n   155→  `).run(now, id);\n   156→}\n   157→\n   158→export function getRecurringLearnings(db, minCount) {\n   159→  return db.prepare(`\n   160→    SELECT * FROM learnings\n   161→    WHERE recurrence_count >= ?\n   162→    ORDER BY recurrence_count DESC\n   163→  `).all(minCount);\n   164→}\n   165→\n   166→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   167→// Findings CRUD\n   168→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   169→\n   170→export function insertFinding(db, record) {\n   171→  const id = crypto.randomUUID();\n   172→  const findingHash = record.finding_hash ?? hashDescription(record.description);\n   173→  const createdAt = new Date().toISOString();\n   174→\n   175→  db.prepare(`\n   176→    INSERT INTO findings (id, run_id, phase, source, severity, description, finding_hash, created_at)\n   177→    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)\n   178→  `).run(\n   179→    id,\n   180→    record.run_id,\n   181→    record.phase,\n   182→    record.source,\n   183→    record.severity,\n   184→    record.description,\n   185→    findingHash,\n   186→    createdAt,\n   187→  );\n   188→\n   189→  return id;\n   190→}\n   191→\n   192→export function getFindingsByRun(db, runId) {\n   193→  return db.prepare(`\n   194→    SELECT * FROM findings\n   195→    WHERE run_id = ?\n   196→    ORDER BY created_at ASC\n   197→  `).all(runId);\n   198→}\n   199→\n   200→export function getRecurringFindingHashes(db, minOccurrences) {\n   201→  return db.prepare(`\n   202→    SELECT finding_hash, COUNT(*) AS count\n   203→    FROM findings\n   204→    GROUP BY finding_hash\n   205→    HAVING COUNT(*) >= ?\n   206→    ORDER BY count DESC\n   207→  `).all(minOccurrences);\n   208→}\n   209→\n   210→export function resolveFinding(db, id) {\n   211→  db.prepare(`\n   212→    UPDATE findings SET resolved = 1 WHERE id = ?\n   213→  `).run(id);\n   214→}\n   215→\n   216→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   217→// Audit history\n   218→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   219→\n   220→export function insertAuditRecord(db, record) {\n   221→  db.prepare(`\n   222→    INSERT INTO audit_history (run_id, finding_count, fix_count, manual_count, quality_score_before, quality_score_after)\n   223→    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)\n   224→  `).run(\n   225→    record.run_id,\n   226→    record.finding_count ?? 0,\n   227→    record.fix_count ?? 0,\n   228→    record.manual_count ?? 0,\n   229→    record.quality_score_before ?? null,\n   230→    record.quality_score_after ?? null,\n   231→  );\n   232→}\n   233→\n   234→export function getAuditTrend(db, limit) {\n   235→  const limitClause = limit ? `LIMIT ${Number(limit)}` : '';\n   236→\n   237→  return db.prepare(`\n   238→    SELECT * FROM audit_history\n   239→    ORDER BY date DESC, id DESC\n   240→    ${limitClause}\n   241→  `).all();\n   242→}\n   243→\n   244→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   245→// Usage\n   246→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   247→\n   248→export function insertUsageRecord(db, record) {\n   249→  db.prepare(`\n   250→    INSERT INTO usage_aggregate (run_id, tokens_saved, bytes_avoided, savings_ratio, index_queries, routing_decisions)\n   251→    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)\n   252→  `).run(\n   253→    record.run_id,\n   254→    record.tokens_saved ?? 0,\n   255→    record.bytes_avoided ?? 0,\n   256→    record.savings_ratio ?? 0.0,\n   257→    record.index_queries ?? 0,\n   258→    record.routing_decisions ?? 0,\n   259→  );\n   260→}\n   261→\n   262→export function getUsageSummary(db) {\n   263→  const row = db.prepare(`\n   264→    SELECT\n   265→      COALESCE(SUM(tokens_saved), 0) AS total_tokens_saved,\n   266→      COALESCE(SUM(bytes_avoided), 0) AS total_bytes_avoided,\n   267→      CASE WHEN COUNT(*) > 0 THEN AVG(savings_ratio) ELSE 0.0 END AS avg_savings_ratio,\n   268→      COALESCE(SUM(index_queries), 0) AS total_index_queries,\n   269→      COUNT(*) AS run_count\n   270→    FROM usage_aggregate\n   271→  `).get();\n   272→\n   273→  return row;\n   274→}\n   275→\n   276→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   277→// Stats (for CLI)\n   278→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   279→\n   280→export function getStateCounts(db) {\n   281→  return {\n   282→    learning_count: db.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM learnings').get().count,\n   283→    finding_count: db.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM findings').get().count,\n   284→    audit_count: db.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM audit_history').get().count,\n   285→    usage_count: db.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM usage_aggregate').get().count,\n   286→  };\n   287→}\n   288→"}]},"uuid":"2fbf530b-50f8-4c09-a865-989fc04ccaf4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.260Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"465297d6-a5be-4d85-a055-3cf40f9949d3","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2fbf530b-50f8-4c09-a865-989fc04ccaf4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01LqRwVFmpPWx9u5gUspG7rT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_016wxgXL33kUAwMEGYZa8NVn","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":415,"cache_read_input_tokens":36978,"output_tokens":151,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":415},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERf5AjQkV3TCuYJqUoT","type":"assistant","uuid":"ee93ed88-d676-4018-860b-2b083adc79a7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.694Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ee93ed88-d676-4018-860b-2b083adc79a7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_016wxgXL33kUAwMEGYZa8NVn","parentToolUseID":"toolu_016wxgXL33kUAwMEGYZa8NVn","uuid":"2f36a0f5-059d-4381-9511-e1ae7607a929","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:46.697Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ee93ed88-d676-4018-860b-2b083adc79a7","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","content":"File content (14052 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","is_error":true,"tool_use_id":"toolu_016wxgXL33kUAwMEGYZa8NVn"}]},"uuid":"e34c3667-85e8-4426-a1fb-572670cacb03","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:52.913Z","toolUseResult":"Error: File content (14052 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ee93ed88-d676-4018-860b-2b083adc79a7","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e34c3667-85e8-4426-a1fb-572670cacb03","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BvJsTc9NbjyovzawwVCdZj","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me research the external systems. Let me use WebSearch to get authoritative details on SonarQube, CodeClimate, GitHub code scanning, and ESLint severity systems."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3686,"cache_read_input_tokens":37393,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3686,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfs7Db53xdXZjFkfqw","type":"assistant","uuid":"11a2f541-658e-475d-b7d5-592d0a6e81ae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:01.152Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"11a2f541-658e-475d-b7d5-592d0a6e81ae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BvJsTc9NbjyovzawwVCdZj","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012mEE3NQXe4udngpZ9SRdkJ","name":"ToolSearch","input":{"query":"select:WebSearch","max_results":1},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3686,"cache_read_input_tokens":37393,"output_tokens":117,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3686},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfs7Db53xdXZjFkfqw","type":"assistant","uuid":"9b8d31dd-64e7-42dd-ba45-42e45e51c196","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:01.409Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9b8d31dd-64e7-42dd-ba45-42e45e51c196","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","tool_use_id":"toolu_012mEE3NQXe4udngpZ9SRdkJ","content":[{"type":"tool_reference","tool_name":"WebSearch"}]}]},"uuid":"72ecec07-e21c-41b5-810d-03aa278d4536","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:01.413Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"9b8d31dd-64e7-42dd-ba45-42e45e51c196","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"72ecec07-e21c-41b5-810d-03aa278d4536","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_013u4dzMUhedhjyeQgZVUaGy","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_014UGnKx8JcmHh5k5nxYE1Um","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"SonarQube severity levels Blocker Critical Major Minor Info definitions 2025"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":647,"cache_read_input_tokens":41079,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":647,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":20,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgbBnfeqi2UEjAti21","type":"assistant","uuid":"e5074bec-b7ee-4f92-ac8b-b9a5c8514299","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:06.981Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e5074bec-b7ee-4f92-ac8b-b9a5c8514299","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_013u4dzMUhedhjyeQgZVUaGy","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01CQfjFmgAM6vXp9WFbEGJnA","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CodeClimate issue categories Bug Risk Complexity Duplication Style classification"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":647,"cache_read_input_tokens":41079,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":647,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":20,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgbBnfeqi2UEjAti21","type":"assistant","uuid":"03cdba2b-0bed-49ba-ac66-4609b61d758f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:07.464Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"03cdba2b-0bed-49ba-ac66-4609b61d758f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_013u4dzMUhedhjyeQgZVUaGy","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01BhWwrbG5GXMfT63xAGa1EG","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"GitHub code scanning alert severity levels Critical High Medium Low criteria"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":647,"cache_read_input_tokens":41079,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":647,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":20,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgbBnfeqi2UEjAti21","type":"assistant","uuid":"6ded6b23-7f81-427f-8c9b-5e06aff6bec9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:07.988Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6ded6b23-7f81-427f-8c9b-5e06aff6bec9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_013u4dzMUhedhjyeQgZVUaGy","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01KYyeygmVHppwsyBgLuauJ4","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"ESLint rule severity error warn off customization configuration"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":647,"cache_read_input_tokens":41079,"output_tokens":208,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":647},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgbBnfeqi2UEjAti21","type":"assistant","uuid":"4c6082fe-9bba-481c-8b62-c664fa7bbc11","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:08.520Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4c6082fe-9bba-481c-8b62-c664fa7bbc11","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CodeClimate issue categories Bug Risk Complexity Duplication Style"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01CQfjFmgAM6vXp9WFbEGJnA","uuid":"3f77b8b9-5903-43d2-a4f0-28cb03b33ee4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:09.265Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3f77b8b9-5903-43d2-a4f0-28cb03b33ee4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"ESLint rule severity error warn off customization configuration"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01KYyeygmVHppwsyBgLuauJ4","uuid":"91091c86-59ee-4143-aa56-6ae27cfb8cff","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:10.083Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"91091c86-59ee-4143-aa56-6ae27cfb8cff","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"GitHub code scanning alert severity levels Critical High Medium Low criteria"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BhWwrbG5GXMfT63xAGa1EG","uuid":"4876fda1-c594-4328-9fb2-2cc4668bdca7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:10.264Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4876fda1-c594-4328-9fb2-2cc4668bdca7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CodeClimate issue categories Bug Risk Complexity Duplication Style"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_011HCXuTBBWgSNWyZmLRyEDL","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01CQfjFmgAM6vXp9WFbEGJnA","uuid":"28a88e78-5ed2-4767-82cd-4433039de906","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:10.416Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"28a88e78-5ed2-4767-82cd-4433039de906","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"SonarQube severity levels Blocker Critical Major Minor Info definitions"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_014UGnKx8JcmHh5k5nxYE1Um","uuid":"cd0f6337-bf9c-4ea1-8a82-ffeb8946ec26","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:10.655Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cd0f6337-bf9c-4ea1-8a82-ffeb8946ec26","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"GitHub code scanning alert severity levels Critical High Medium Low criteria"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01Xbt7RCpvqvJHzXGpqvjizh","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BhWwrbG5GXMfT63xAGa1EG","uuid":"7eaa79df-e467-4684-a32d-68b7c8b4fd1e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:11.702Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7eaa79df-e467-4684-a32d-68b7c8b4fd1e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"ESLint rule severity error warn off customization configuration"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01J59PSxJSaGs67rphgTjaoT","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01KYyeygmVHppwsyBgLuauJ4","uuid":"66ed1970-191d-4867-bd8c-92846a41c4ac","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:11.816Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"03cdba2b-0bed-49ba-ac66-4609b61d758f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01CQfjFmgAM6vXp9WFbEGJnA","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CodeClimate issue categories Bug Risk Complexity Duplication Style classification\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"codeclimate-grep/README.md at master · codeclimate/codeclimate-grep\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate-grep/blob/master/README.md\"},{\"title\":\"CodeClimateRule (PMD Core 6.13.0 API)\",\"url\":\"https://javadoc.io/static/net.sourceforge.pmd/pmd-core/6.13.0/net/sourceforge/pmd/renderers/CodeClimateRule.html\"},{\"title\":\"platform/spec/analyzers/SPEC.md at master · codeclimate/platform\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/codeclimate/platform/blob/master/spec/analyzers/SPEC.md\"},{\"title\":\"Code Climate | Quality, Complexity, and Hotspots\",\"url\":\"https://www.ai-toptier.com/ai-tools/codeclimate\"},{\"title\":\"codeclimate-pylint/codeclimate_reporter.py at master · mikebryant/codeclimate-pylint\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/mikebryant/codeclimate-pylint/blob/master/codeclimate_reporter.py\"},{\"title\":\"Fill in category descriptions by fulldecent · Pull Request #39 · codeclimate/platform\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/codeclimate/platform/pull/39/files\"},{\"title\":\"What is Qlty? | Qlty Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Detects \\\"Identical blocks of code\\\" that are in no way identical · Issue #290 · codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication/issues/290\"},{\"title\":\"Issues - codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication - Code Climate\",\"url\":\"https://codeclimate.com/github/codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication/issues\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - qltysh-archive/codeclimate-duplication: Code Climate engine for code duplication analysis\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate-duplication\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I found comprehensive information about CodeClimate issue categories and their classification.\n\n## CodeClimate Issue Categories\n\nCodeClimate recognizes the following issue categories: Bug Risk, Clarity, Compatibility, Complexity, Duplication, Performance, Security, and Style.\n\nThe \"categories\" field defaults to [\"Bug Risk\"] when classifying issues, and it's a list of categories an issue falls into.\n\n### Category Descriptions\n\nAccording to the CodeClimate platform documentation, here's what each category represents:\n\n- **Bug Risk** — the meaning is likely to not be what the author intended (e.g., `if (a = 5)` when `==` was intended)\n- **Clarity** — the meaning is unclear\n- **Compatibility** — the meaning has changed and is no longer valid (e.g., using deprecated APIs)\n- **Complexity** — the meaning should be broken into smaller pieces\n- **Duplication** — repeated code that should be refactored\n- **Performance** — code efficiency issues\n- **Security** — security vulnerabilities\n- **Style** — code formatting and style issues\n\nThese categories help developers understand the nature and impact of code issues identified by CodeClimate's analysis engines.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"5cce7aea-b2b8-40ec-acb7-140c8d0ae4d8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:13.721Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"03cdba2b-0bed-49ba-ac66-4609b61d758f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5cce7aea-b2b8-40ec-acb7-140c8d0ae4d8","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"SonarQube severity levels Blocker Critical Major Minor Info definitions"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01RRuh7GpHdwobc1uj2WUnkF","parentToolUseID":"toolu_014UGnKx8JcmHh5k5nxYE1Um","uuid":"b67dbad4-44c4-411b-92fa-84d132d8760f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:14.212Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6ded6b23-7f81-427f-8c9b-5e06aff6bec9","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01BhWwrbG5GXMfT63xAGa1EG","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"GitHub code scanning alert severity levels Critical High Medium Low criteria\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.11 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.11/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"CodeQL code scanning: new severity levels for security alerts - GitHub Changelog\",\"url\":\"https://github.blog/changelog/2021-07-19-codeql-code-scanning-new-severity-levels-for-security-alerts/\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Cloud Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/github-ae@latest/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.12 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/enterprise-server@3.12/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.13 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.13/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.9 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.9/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.6 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.6/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.4 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.4/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/about-code-scanning-alerts\"},{\"title\":\"About code scanning alerts - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.7 Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.7/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's information about GitHub code scanning alert severity levels:\n\n## Severity Levels\n\nGitHub code scanning alerts have security severity levels of Critical, High, Medium, or Low.\n\n## Criteria and Calculation\n\nSecurity severity levels follow the industry-standard Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). \n\nThe calculation methodology is:\n\n1. GitHub searches for all CVEs assigned to CWE tags associated with the security query, calculates the 75th percentile of the CVSS score for those CVEs, and defines that score as the security severity for the query.\n\n2. The numerical scores are then translated to Critical, High, Medium, or Low using the CVSS definitions.\n\n## Default Behavior\n\nBy default, code scanning checks fail only if one or more alerts of severity error, or security severity critical or high are detected. You can specify which security-severity level for code scanning results should cause check failure by going to the Security & Analysis tab in the repository settings.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"4b262f92-eca8-4088-ad9f-4a4dc85cbb54","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:15.194Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6ded6b23-7f81-427f-8c9b-5e06aff6bec9","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4c6082fe-9bba-481c-8b62-c664fa7bbc11","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01KYyeygmVHppwsyBgLuauJ4","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"ESLint rule severity error warn off customization configuration\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Configure Rules - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter\",\"url\":\"https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/rules\"},{\"title\":\"Change Request: Add more context to incorrect rule severity configurations · Issue #17056 · eslint/eslint\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/17056\"},{\"title\":\"Configuration Files - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter\",\"url\":\"https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/configuration-files\"},{\"title\":\"Custom Rules - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter\",\"url\":\"https://eslint.org/docs/latest/extend/custom-rules\"},{\"title\":\"Default Severity · Issue #14679 · eslint/eslint\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/14679\"},{\"title\":\"Command Line Interface Reference - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter\",\"url\":\"https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/command-line-interface\"},{\"title\":\"Rules - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript linter\",\"url\":\"https://archive.eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring/rules\"},{\"title\":\"ES-Lint configuration is invalid -> severity should be one of the following · Issue #471 · AtomLinter/linter-eslint\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/AtomLinter/linter-eslint/issues/471\"},{\"title\":\"Feature Request: Add severity \\\"off\\\" to eslint.rules.customizations setting · Issue #1241 · microsoft/vscode-eslint\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-eslint/issues/1241\"},{\"title\":\"You might as well not use Eslint's Warning Severity\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@tangiblej/you-might-as-well-not-use-eslints-warning-severity-warnings-will-get-ignored-38d52848238e\"}]\n\nI've found comprehensive information about ESLint rule severity configuration. Here are the key findings:\n\n## Rule Severity Levels\n\nESLint validates the first element of the rule config array as a severity (\"off\", \"warn\", \"error\", 0, 1, 2). The severity options are:\n- **\"off\"** or **0** - Disables the rule entirely\n- **\"warn\"** or **1** - Reports violations as warnings\n- **\"error\"** or **2** - Reports violations as errors\n\n## Basic Configuration\n\nRules can be configured in eslint.config.js with examples like `eqeqeq: \"off\"`, `\"no-unused-vars\": \"error\"`, and `\"prefer-const\": [\"error\", { ignoreReadBeforeAssign: true }]`.\n\n## When to Use Each Severity\n\nIf you don't want to enforce compliance with a rule but would still like ESLint to report violations, set the severity to \"warn\". This is typically used when introducing a new rule that will eventually be set to \"error\", when a rule is flagging something other than a potential buildtime or runtime error, or when a rule cannot determine with certainty that a problem has been found.\n\n## Configuration with Options\n\nThe array indicates that the configuration is for the severity and any options. When a rule requires additional options, you provide them as array elements after the severity level, such as `[\"error\", { option: value }]`.\n\n## Multiple Configuration Objects\n\nWhen more than one configuration object specifies the same rule, the rule configuration is merged with the later object taking precedence over any previous objects.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"d6d9f0a2-c6bf-4271-9409-db740d6bc02f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:16.313Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"4c6082fe-9bba-481c-8b62-c664fa7bbc11","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e5074bec-b7ee-4f92-ac8b-b9a5c8514299","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_014UGnKx8JcmHh5k5nxYE1Um","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"SonarQube severity levels Blocker Critical Major Minor Info definitions 2025\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Some SonarQube issues have a significant but small effect on faults and changes. A large-scale empirical study - ScienceDirect\",\"url\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0164121220301734\"},{\"title\":\"SonarQube Severity Categories - SonarQube Server / Community Build - Sonar Community\",\"url\":\"https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarqube-severity-categories/115287\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 10.3 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.3/user-guide/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 10.4 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.4/user-guide/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 9.9 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/9.9/user-guide/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 9.8 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/9.8/user-guide/issues/\"},{\"title\":\"SonarQube glossary | SonarQube Server | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/glossary\"},{\"title\":\"Metric definitions | SonarQube Server 10.0 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.0/user-guide/metric-definitions\"},{\"title\":\"Requirement to retrieve new code vulnerabilities count for Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor, Info - SonarQube Server / Community Build - Sonar Community\",\"url\":\"https://community.sonarsource.com/t/requirement-to-retrieve-new-code-vulnerabilities-count-for-blocker-critical-major-minor-info/101584\"},{\"title\":\"Understanding measures and metrics | SonarQube Server 10.8 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.8/user-guide/code-metrics/metrics-definition\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here are the SonarQube severity levels and their definitions:\n\n## SonarQube Severity Levels\n\n**BLOCKER**: Bug with a high probability to impact the behavior of the application in production. For example, a memory leak, or an unclosed JDBC connection are BLOCKERs that must be fixed immediately.\n\n**CRITICAL**: Either a bug with a low probability to impact the behavior of the application in production or an issue that represents a security flaw. An empty catch block or SQL injection would be a CRITICAL issue. The code must be reviewed immediately.\n\n**MAJOR**: A quality flaw that can highly impact the developer's productivity. An uncovered piece of code, duplicated blocks, or unused parameters are examples of MAJOR issues.\n\n**MINOR**: A quality flaw that can slightly impact the developer's productivity. For example, lines should not be too long, and \"switch\" statements should have at least 3 cases, are both be considered MINOR issues.\n\n**INFO**: Neither a bug nor a quality flaw, just a finding.\n\n### Important Note on Version Changes\n\nThe severity feature evolved in SonarQube 10.2. The following mapping was applied: Blocker, Critical mapped to High; Major mapped to Medium; Minor, Info mapped to Low. This means that newer versions of SonarQube (10.2+) use a simplified three-level severity system (High, Medium, Low) instead of the traditional five-level system (Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor, Info).\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"3fb3884f-8c1d-4404-bcb2-f464eb18113f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:23.612Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"e5074bec-b7ee-4f92-ac8b-b9a5c8514299","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3fb3884f-8c1d-4404-bcb2-f464eb18113f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_015gnGuKzZMPnjmDDfW9gtB3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me get more detail on the SonarQube evolution to the new \"software quality\" model and how CVSS maps to GitHub severity."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2659,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1204,"cache_read_input_tokens":41726,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1204,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERiTv3KQPENuT8szL6c","type":"assistant","uuid":"591d9ddf-89be-4744-9193-d989b55067c9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:36.308Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"591d9ddf-89be-4744-9193-d989b55067c9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_015gnGuKzZMPnjmDDfW9gtB3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01VKWTDJfxTjAjh4vuGERpiW","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"SonarQube 10.2 new severity model software quality impact HIGH MEDIUM LOW mapping 2024 2025"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2659,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1204,"cache_read_input_tokens":41726,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1204,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERiTv3KQPENuT8szL6c","type":"assistant","uuid":"041a3c41-a9a8-4abf-8550-942975f50bfe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:37.289Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"041a3c41-a9a8-4abf-8550-942975f50bfe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_015gnGuKzZMPnjmDDfW9gtB3","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_017DEDqNto9EF3NHXphoJK8a","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CVSS score ranges Critical High Medium Low numeric thresholds"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2659,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1204,"cache_read_input_tokens":41726,"output_tokens":158,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1204},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERiTv3KQPENuT8szL6c","type":"assistant","uuid":"75c395d6-0fdb-4794-bb48-18f545980861","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:37.428Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"75c395d6-0fdb-4794-bb48-18f545980861","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CVSS score ranges Critical High Medium Low numeric thresholds"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_017DEDqNto9EF3NHXphoJK8a","uuid":"c14100de-8a9a-4d43-91d7-1499da91b017","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:38.242Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c14100de-8a9a-4d43-91d7-1499da91b017","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"SonarQube 10.2 new severity model software quality impact 2024"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01VKWTDJfxTjAjh4vuGERpiW","uuid":"300d1ddd-0034-42a8-a25c-9d5799850aa4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:38.283Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"300d1ddd-0034-42a8-a25c-9d5799850aa4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"SonarQube 10.2 new severity model software quality impact 2024"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01JmKnWwgxkajZx6rte4UYxT","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01VKWTDJfxTjAjh4vuGERpiW","uuid":"b19a79de-872a-409f-9f94-ea81a9396546","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:39.445Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b19a79de-872a-409f-9f94-ea81a9396546","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CVSS score ranges Critical High Medium Low numeric thresholds"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_015Q9pmFj71DDWjRmEyjf4q3","parentToolUseID":"toolu_017DEDqNto9EF3NHXphoJK8a","uuid":"236ff728-befa-43f3-8f17-993a7d2f146d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:39.897Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"75c395d6-0fdb-4794-bb48-18f545980861","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_017DEDqNto9EF3NHXphoJK8a","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CVSS score ranges Critical High Medium Low numeric thresholds\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"NVD - Vulnerability Metrics\",\"url\":\"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss\"},{\"title\":\"Common Vulnerability Scoring System - Wikipedia\",\"url\":\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Vulnerability_Scoring_System\"},{\"title\":\"Severity Levels for Security Issues | Atlassian\",\"url\":\"https://www.atlassian.com/trust/security/security-severity-levels\"},{\"title\":\"CVSS v3.1 Specification Document\",\"url\":\"https://www.first.org/cvss/v3.1/specification-document\"},{\"title\":\"Common Vulnerability Scoring System SIG\",\"url\":\"https://www.first.org/cvss/\"},{\"title\":\"CVSS v4.0 Specification Document\",\"url\":\"https://www.first.org/cvss/specification-document\"},{\"title\":\"Understanding CVSS: The Common Vulnerability Scoring System | FOSSA Blog\",\"url\":\"https://fossa.com/blog/understanding-cvss-common-vulnerability-scoring-system/\"},{\"title\":\"CVSS Scores vs. VPR (Tenable Nessus 10.11)\",\"url\":\"https://docs.tenable.com/nessus/Content/RiskMetrics.htm\"},{\"title\":\"What is CVSS - Common Vulnerability Scoring System | SANS Institute\",\"url\":\"https://www.sans.org/blog/what-is-cvss\"},{\"title\":\"Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) | CrowdStrike\",\"url\":\"https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/exposure-management/common-vulnerability-scoring-system-cvss/\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here are the CVSS score ranges and numeric thresholds for severity ratings:\n\n## CVSS Score Ranges by Severity Level\n\nThe numeric thresholds are:\n- **None**: 0.0\n- **Low**: 0.1–3.9\n- **Medium**: 4.0–6.9\n- **High**: 7.0–8.9\n- **Critical**: 9.0–10.0\n\nThese severity ratings apply across modern CVSS versions. CVSS v3.x defined textual severity ratings of None (0), Low (0.1-3.9), Medium (4.0-6.9), High (7.0-8.9), and Critical (9.0-10.0), and CVSS v4.0 maintains similar boundaries (for example, 9.0 to 10.0 for critical, 7.0 to 8.9 for high, etc.)\n\nCVSS metrics result in a numerical score ranging from 0 to 10, and the numerical score can be translated into a qualitative representation to help organizations properly assess and prioritize their vulnerability management processes.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"1c16cf18-ff9f-4846-9931-32982c16b0c9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:42.413Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"75c395d6-0fdb-4794-bb48-18f545980861","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"041a3c41-a9a8-4abf-8550-942975f50bfe","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01VKWTDJfxTjAjh4vuGERpiW","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"SonarQube 10.2 new severity model software quality impact HIGH MEDIUM LOW mapping 2024 2025\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Our commitment to you – and an update on severity ratings for software quality | Sonar\",\"url\":\"https://www.sonarsource.com/blog/sonars-commitment-to-you/\"},{\"title\":\"Our commitment to you – and an update on severity ratings for software quality - Security Boulevard\",\"url\":\"https://securityboulevard.com/2024/11/our-commitment-to-you-and-an-update-on-severity-ratings-for-software-quality/\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 10.4 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.4/user-guide/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Introducing SonarQube 10.2: Setting New Standards in Code Quality and Security | Sonar\",\"url\":\"https://www.sonarsource.com/blog/sonarqube-10-2-new-standards-in-code-quality-and-security/\"},{\"title\":\"Issues | SonarQube Server 10.3 | Sonar Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.3/user-guide/issues\"},{\"title\":\"Change severity in sonarqube 10.2 - SonarQube Server / Community Build - Sonar Community\",\"url\":\"https://community.sonarsource.com/t/change-severity-in-sonarqube-10-2/110637\"},{\"title\":\"sonarqube-driven quality gates: improving software ...\",\"url\":\"https://romanpub.com/resources/ijaet-v6-2-2024-10.pdf\"},{\"title\":\"Some SonarQube issues have a significant but small effect on faults and changes. A large-scale empirical study - ScienceDirect\",\"url\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0164121220301734\"},{\"title\":\"What's new in SonarQube | Sonar\",\"url\":\"https://www.sonarsource.com/products/sonarqube/whats-new/\"},{\"title\":\"New SQ gate doesn't have severity - Suggest new features - Sonar Community\",\"url\":\"https://community.sonarsource.com/t/new-sq-gate-doesnt-have-severity/115895\"}]\n\nBased on the web search results, here's what I found about SonarQube 10.2's new severity model:\n\n## SonarQube 10.2 Severity Model Overview\n\nIn SonarQube 10.2, issues are classified by severity—now represented as Low, Medium, or High based on software qualities.\n\n### Severity Mapping Details\n\n**High**: Issues with a high or low probability to impact the behavior of the application in production, or represent a security flaw. Examples include a memory leak, an unclosed JDBC connection, an empty catch block, or an SQL injection. Reviewing these issues should be a top priority.\n\n**Medium**: A quality flaw that can highly impact the developer's productivity. Examples include an uncovered piece of code, duplicated blocks, or unused parameters.\n\n**Low**: A quality flaw that can slightly impact the developer's productivity. Examples include lines should not be too long, and \"switch\" statements should have at least 3 cases. This severity level also includes issues that are neither bugs nor quality flaws, just findings.\n\n### Software Quality Impact Approach\n\nThe Multi-Quality Rule (MQR) Mode aims to more accurately represent the impact an issue has on all software qualities by assigning a separate severity to a rule for each software quality it might impact, focusing on ensuring the impact on all software qualities is clear, not just the one most severely impacted.\n\n### Backward Compatibility Note\n\nSonarQube Server 10.8 restored the ability to customize rule severities by introducing two modes: Standard Experience Mode and Multi-Quality Rule (MQR) Mode, enabling users to continue using familiar workflows from SonarQube Server 9.9 or use the concepts introduced in SonarQube Server 10.2.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"923e55ed-42f8-42cb-a2b9-08b75574495d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:45.450Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"041a3c41-a9a8-4abf-8550-942975f50bfe","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"923e55ed-42f8-42cb-a2b9-08b75574495d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"ac009da573eff7f65","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01HoDddWeCb9Drwm2cTAsJjm","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now I have comprehensive data on all four external systems plus a thorough understanding of Wazir's current state. Let me synthesize the finding classification schema.\n\n---\n\n## Finding Classification Schema for Wazir\n\n### Part 1: External System Research\n\n#### 1. SonarQube Severity Levels\n\nSonarQube's classic model (pre-10.2) uses five levels:\n\n| Level | Definition | Action |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Blocker** | High probability of impacting production behavior (memory leak, unclosed connection) | Fix immediately |\n| **Critical** | Low probability of production impact OR security flaw (empty catch, SQL injection) | Review immediately |\n| **Major** | Quality flaw that highly impacts developer productivity (uncovered code, duplication, unused params) | Plan fix |\n| **Minor** | Quality flaw that slightly impacts productivity (line length, switch case count) | Consider fix |\n| **Info** | Neither bug nor quality flaw, just a finding | Note |\n\nSonarQube 10.2+ collapsed this to three levels (High, Medium, Low) mapped by software quality impact, introducing \"Multi-Quality Rule Mode\" where a single rule can have different severities for different quality dimensions (reliability vs. maintainability vs. security). The key insight: **severity should reflect impact on the affected quality dimension**, not a single universal scale.\n\n#### 2. CodeClimate Issue Categories\n\nCodeClimate classifies by **nature of the problem**, not just severity:\n\n| Category | Definition |\n|---|---|\n| **Bug Risk** | Code likely does not do what the author intended (e.g., `if (a = 5)`) |\n| **Clarity** | Meaning is unclear to readers |\n| **Compatibility** | Uses deprecated or invalid APIs |\n| **Complexity** | Should be broken into smaller pieces |\n| **Duplication** | Repeated code that should be refactored |\n| **Performance** | Efficiency issues |\n| **Security** | Vulnerabilities |\n| **Style** | Formatting and convention violations |\n\nKey insight: **Categories are orthogonal to severity.** A \"Bug Risk\" can be minor or critical. A \"Security\" issue can be low or critical. The two-axis model (category x severity) gives richer classification than either alone.\n\n#### 3. GitHub Code Scanning Alert Severity\n\nGitHub uses CVSS-based numeric scoring translated to four levels:\n\n| Level | CVSS Range | Gate behavior |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Critical** | 9.0-10.0 | Fails check by default |\n| **High** | 7.0-8.9 | Fails check by default |\n| **Medium** | 4.0-6.9 | Does not fail check by default |\n| **Low** | 0.1-3.9 | Does not fail check by default |\n\nKey insight: GitHub computes severity from the **75th percentile of CVE CVSS scores** associated with a CWE. This is a statistical, evidence-based approach rather than subjective judgment. The gating threshold is configurable per-repository.\n\n#### 4. ESLint Rule Severity\n\nESLint uses three levels:\n\n| Level | Numeric | Behavior |\n|---|---|---|\n| **error** | 2 | Exit code non-zero, fails CI |\n| **warn** | 1 | Reported but does not fail CI |\n| **off** | 0 | Rule disabled entirely |\n\nKey insight: ESLint's model is purely about **whether the finding gates the build**, not about the nature of the problem. Projects customize by promoting `warn` to `error` as teams adopt stricter standards. The graduated adoption pattern (warn first, error later) is effective for incremental quality improvement.\n\n---\n\n### Part 2: Wazir's Current State\n\nWazir already has pieces of this system scattered across several files:\n\n- **Findings DB** (`tooling/src/state/db.js`): stores `severity IN ('critical','high','medium','low')` -- four levels\n- **Reviewer skill** (`skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`): uses `blocking`, `warning`, `note` in prose -- three levels\n- **Phase report schema** (`schemas/phase-report.schema.json`): `risk_flags.severity IN ('low','medium','high')` -- three levels\n- **Security sensitivity** (`tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js`): pattern-based detection that adds 6 security dimensions when triggered, with severity guidance: `critical (exploitable), high (likely exploitable), medium (defense-in-depth gap), low (best-practice deviation)`\n- **Gating rules** (`config/gating-rules.yaml`): blocks on `risk_flags` with `severity: high`, zero test failures, zero lint/type errors\n- **Learning pipeline**: `getRecurringFindingHashes(db, 2)` promotes recurring findings to learning candidates\n\n**The gap**: There is no single canonical document that defines how findings are classified, what each severity means, what categories exist, how auto-classification works, and how classification drives gating and learning decisions. The three-level and four-level systems are inconsistent between files.\n\n---\n\n### Part 3: Proposed Finding Classification Schema\n\n#### Severity Levels (4 levels, reconciled)\n\nWazir should standardize on four severity levels across all systems. This reconciles the DB schema (which already has four) with the prose and report schema (which have three).\n\n| Severity | Meaning | Gating effect | Fix expectation | SonarQube equivalent | CVSS range |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| **critical** | Exploitable security flaw, data loss, or production crash. The system is broken or unsafe. | **Blocks**: verdict cannot be PASS. Pipeline halts. | Must fix before merge. No exceptions. | Blocker | 9.0-10.0 |\n| **high** | Correctness bug, likely-exploitable security issue, missing required functionality, or spec violation. The system works but is wrong. | **Blocks**: verdict cannot be PASS. Auto-fix loop triggered. | Must fix. User can override with explicit approval + documented rationale. | Critical | 7.0-8.9 |\n| **medium** | Defense-in-depth gap, performance concern, incomplete error handling, or quality issue that affects maintainability. The system works but has rough edges. | **Warns**: verdict can still be PASS if score threshold met. Logged for learning. | Should fix in current run if time permits. Otherwise deferred to next run. | Major | 4.0-6.9 |\n| **low** | Style preference, naming suggestion, minor documentation gap, or best-practice deviation with no functional impact. | **Notes**: no gating effect. Logged for learning. | May fix. Not expected. Captured for pattern detection. | Minor/Info | 0.1-3.9 |\n\n**Gating rule mapping**: The gating agent in `config/gating-rules.yaml` should interpret these as:\n- `critical` or `high` unresolved findings --> `risk_flags` with `severity: \"high\"` --> blocks `continue` verdict\n- `medium` findings --> `risk_flags` with `severity: \"medium\"` --> does NOT block but appears in report\n- `low` findings --> `risk_flags` with `severity: \"low\"` --> informational only\n\n#### Finding Categories (8 categories)\n\nDrawing from CodeClimate's orthogonal category model and Wazir's existing review dimensions:\n\n| Category | Definition | Typical sources | Example |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **correctness** | Code does not do what it should. Logic errors, wrong behavior, broken functionality. | Task review (dim 1), final review (dims 1, 2) | Off-by-one in pagination, wrong HTTP status code |\n| **security** | Vulnerabilities, auth flaws, data exposure, injection vectors. | Security sensitivity check, task review (security dims when triggered) | SQL injection, hardcoded API key, missing CSRF token |\n| **completeness** | Missing functionality, unimplemented acceptance criteria, dropped scope items. | Final review (dims 2, 9), plan review (dim 8) | Feature from input not implemented, missing API endpoint |\n| **wiring** | Disconnected paths, missing imports, dead code, orphaned routes. | Task review (dim 3), final review (dim 3) | Route defined but handler not imported, unused export |\n| **verification** | Insufficient evidence, missing tests, unsubstantiated claims, no type coverage. | Task review (dim 2), final review (dim 4) | \"It works\" without test, untested error path |\n| **drift** | Implementation deviates from spec, plan, or original user input. Scope creep or silent scope reduction. | Task review (dim 4), final review (dims 5, 8) | Feature added that user never requested, changed behavior without spec update |\n| **performance** | Efficiency issues, N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders, memory waste. | Expertise modules, task review (quality dim) | Loading entire table when one row needed, synchronous blocking call |\n| **style** | Naming, formatting, documentation gaps, code organization, convention violations. | Task review (dim 5), final review (dims 6, 7) | Inconsistent naming, missing JSDoc, overly long function |\n\n**One finding, one primary category.** A finding may have a secondary category (e.g., a SQL injection is primarily `security` but also `correctness`), but the primary category drives classification logic.\n\n#### Auto-Classification Rules\n\nThese rules assign default severity based on category and detected patterns. The reviewer can override any default with cited justification.\n\n```\n# Security findings: always high floor\ncategory == \"security\" --> severity >= high\n  if security_sensitivity.triggered && pattern in [\"sql\", \"auth\", \"token\", \"secret\", \"credential\"]\n    --> severity = critical\n  if security_sensitivity.triggered && pattern in [\"cors\", \"csrf\", \"session\"]\n    --> severity = high\n\n# Correctness findings: high floor when in production paths\ncategory == \"correctness\" --> severity >= high\n  if affected_path is test-only\n    --> severity = medium\n\n# Completeness findings: severity depends on scope coverage\ncategory == \"completeness\"\n  if missing_item_count / total_input_items > 0.2\n    --> severity = critical  (>20% scope dropped)\n  if missing_item_count > 0\n    --> severity = high\n\n# Wiring findings: high floor (broken paths = broken product)\ncategory == \"wiring\" --> severity >= high\n\n# Verification findings: medium floor\ncategory == \"verification\" --> severity >= medium\n  if no tests exist at all for a feature\n    --> severity = high\n\n# Drift findings: severity depends on direction\ncategory == \"drift\"\n  if scope_creep (added unrequested features)\n    --> severity = medium\n  if scope_reduction (dropped requested features)\n    --> severity = high\n  if contradicts user correction from user-input-log.ndjson\n    --> severity = critical\n\n# Performance findings: medium default\ncategory == \"performance\" --> severity = medium\n  if O(n^2) or worse on user-facing path\n    --> severity = high\n\n# Style findings: low default, always\ncategory == \"style\" --> severity = low\n  exception: if inconsistency is systematic (>5 instances)\n    --> severity = medium (maintainability concern)\n```\n\n#### How Classification Affects the Gating Agent\n\nThe gating agent (`tooling/src/gating/agent.js`) consumes `risk_flags` from the phase report. The classification schema feeds this as follows:\n\n1. **Blocking gate** (prevents `continue` verdict):\n   - Any unresolved finding with `severity: critical` or `severity: high`\n   - Maps to: `risk_flags` with `severity: \"high\"` in the phase report\n   - Forces: `loop_back` (if deterministic fix path exists) or `escalate` (if ambiguous)\n\n2. **Warning gate** (logged but does not block):\n   - Unresolved findings with `severity: medium`\n   - Maps to: `risk_flags` with `severity: \"medium\"`\n   - Effect: Appears in report, visible to user, counts against quality score but does not prevent PASS\n\n3. **No gate effect**:\n   - Findings with `severity: low`\n   - Maps to: `risk_flags` with `severity: \"low\"` or omitted\n   - Effect: Logged to DB for learning pipeline only\n\n4. **Score impact**: In `final` mode, each unresolved finding deducts from the dimension score:\n   - `critical`: -3 points from dimension score\n   - `high`: -2 points from dimension score\n   - `medium`: -1 point from dimension score\n   - `low`: -0 points (no score impact)\n\n#### How Classification Feeds the Learning System\n\nThe `state.sqlite` findings table already stores `severity`, `phase`, `source`, `description`, and `finding_hash`. Adding `category` would complete the classification. The learning pipeline uses this data as follows:\n\n1. **Recurring pattern detection**: `getRecurringFindingHashes(db, minOccurrences=2)` already identifies findings that recur across runs. Adding category awareness means the system can detect \"we keep making security mistakes\" vs. \"we keep making style mistakes\" -- different response strategies.\n\n2. **Severity escalation for recurring findings**: If a finding hash recurs 3+ times and was originally `medium`, the system proposes escalating it to `high` for future runs. Rationale: if the team keeps making the same mistake, it is not a minor issue -- it is a systemic gap.\n\n3. **Category-based learning proposals**: The learner role groups recurring findings by category to produce higher-quality learnings:\n   - Recurring `security` findings --> propose as antipattern in `expertise/antipatterns/security/`\n   - Recurring `correctness` findings --> propose as test requirement in future specs\n   - Recurring `style` findings --> propose as linting rule or convention update\n   - Recurring `drift` findings --> propose as clarifier improvement (better spec pinning)\n\n4. **Confidence scoring**: Learning confidence maps from finding recurrence and severity:\n   - Single-run, `low` severity: `confidence: low` -- might be noise\n   - Multi-run recurrence at `medium`+: `confidence: high` -- systemic pattern\n   - User correction (from `user-input-log.ndjson`) confirming a finding: `confidence: high` immediately\n\n5. **Antipattern library growth**: Findings with `category: security` that recur become entries in `expertise/antipatterns/security/`, loaded by the reviewer via `expertise/composition-map.yaml` in future runs. This closes the loop: finding --> learning --> expertise --> prevention.\n\n#### Schema Reconciliation Needed\n\nTo implement this schema, these files need alignment:\n\n| File | Current state | Needed change |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tooling/src/state/db.js` | severity: `critical, high, medium, low` | Add `category` column to findings table |\n| `schemas/phase-report.schema.json` | risk_flags severity: `low, medium, high` | Add `critical` to the enum |\n| `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md` | Uses `blocking, warning, note` in prose | Align to `critical, high, medium, low` |\n| `config/gating-rules.yaml` | Checks `risk_flags` for `severity: high` | Add check for `severity: critical` |\n| `exports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md` | Mentions \"findings with severity\" generically | Reference classification schema |\n\n---\n\n### Key Design Decisions in This Schema\n\n1. **Four severity levels, not three or five.** Three (SonarQube 10.2+) loses the critical/high distinction that matters for security. Five (classic SonarQube) adds Blocker/Critical ambiguity. Four matches CVSS, GitHub, and the existing DB schema.\n\n2. **Categories orthogonal to severity.** Following CodeClimate's model. A style finding is always low; a security finding is always high+. But a correctness finding could be medium (in test-only code) or critical (in auth flow). Category sets the floor; context adjusts.\n\n3. **Auto-classification with override.** Default rules prevent the reviewer from under-classifying security issues. But the reviewer can override any default with cited justification, logged in the reasoning chain. This prevents both false negatives (security bug rated low) and inflexibility (context-dependent judgment).\n\n4. **Classification drives gating, not just reporting.** The entire point of classification is to automate the continue/loop_back/escalate decision. Without it, the gating agent has no semantic understanding of findings.\n\n5. **Classification feeds learning, not just the current run.** The recurring-pattern escalation and category-based learning proposal generation mean the system gets stricter over time for patterns the team keeps producing, while remaining lenient for one-off issues.\n\nSources:\n- [SonarQube Issues Documentation (10.4)](https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server/10.4/user-guide/issues)\n- [SonarQube Severity Categories - Community Discussion](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarqube-severity-categories/115287)\n- [SonarQube 10.2 New Severity Model](https://www.sonarsource.com/blog/sonarqube-10-2-new-standards-in-code-quality-and-security/)\n- [Sonar's Commitment - Severity Update](https://www.sonarsource.com/blog/sonars-commitment-to-you/)\n- [CodeClimate Platform Analyzer Spec](https://github.com/codeclimate/platform/blob/master/spec/analyzers/SPEC.md)\n- [CodeClimate Category Descriptions PR](https://github.com/codeclimate/platform/pull/39/files)\n- [GitHub Code Scanning Alerts Documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/managing-code-scanning-alerts/about-code-scanning-alerts)\n- [GitHub CodeQL Severity Levels Changelog](https://github.blog/changelog/2021-07-19-codeql-code-scanning-new-severity-levels-for-security-alerts/)\n- [ESLint Configure Rules](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/rules)\n- [CVSS v3.1 Specification](https://www.first.org/cvss/v3.1/specification-document)\n- [NVD CVSS Metrics](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss)"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":738,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3845,"cache_read_input_tokens":42930,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3845,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERkioHuwppvwvRdS2BN","type":"assistant","uuid":"7cc2fb4c-dda0-4de9-aa88-418d6dc364c8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:42:39.915Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}