@wazir-dev/cli 1.2.0 → 1.4.0

package/docs/research/2026-03-20-agents/a7c46d1bba1056ed2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+{"parentUuid":null,"isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":"Research ONLY — no code. How do code review systems implement multi-tier review?\n\nResearch:\n1. Superpowers two-stage review — read subagent-driven-development skill. Spec compliance THEN code quality. How are they structured? What does each check?\n2. Google's code review process — author → reviewer → approver chain\n3. GitHub CODEOWNERS — how do required reviewers work?\n4. CodeRabbit — how does AI review integrate with human review?\n\nFor Wazir's two-tier review:\n- Tier 1 (internal, Sonnet): what dimensions? What's the prompt? What expertise modules?\n- Tier 2 (Codex, external): what changes vs tier 1? Different dimensions? Fresh perspective?\n- How do findings from tier 1 feed into tier 2's context?\n- What if tier 1 and tier 2 disagree?\n\nOutput: Two-tier review architecture for Wazir with dimension sets, model selection, and conflict resolution."},"uuid":"8049c3c1-f56a-42d9-8cd2-c2eab75beebe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:40.526Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8049c3c1-f56a-42d9-8cd2-c2eab75beebe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0116w4tw1g2e8q4N1VBMmda1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI'll research the existing Wazir codebase first to understand the current two-tier review implementation, then research external systems."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2670,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2670,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHKhysF9Bre2ZyFLZ8","type":"assistant","uuid":"40d65b53-e330-40e4-8fc6-d84a5cc68a03","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:51.649Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"40d65b53-e330-40e4-8fc6-d84a5cc68a03","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0116w4tw1g2e8q4N1VBMmda1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"two-tier|two.tier|tier.1|tier.2|multi.*tier.*review","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2670,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2670,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHKhysF9Bre2ZyFLZ8","type":"assistant","uuid":"a04af1ae-0a04-44bf-a1b2-ba7638973cd2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.023Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a04af1ae-0a04-44bf-a1b2-ba7638973cd2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","uuid":"5461ebf3-f850-48d4-b84d-ea426ec89e72","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.025Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5461ebf3-f850-48d4-b84d-ea426ec89e72","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","toolUseID":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.121Z","uuid":"19267eff-58a8-42dd-b9a1-63f92de0e35c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a04af1ae-0a04-44bf-a1b2-ba7638973cd2","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01SKQ6KxxGVBvAkLYSrCdwW6","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 3 files\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/gamification.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/notifications.md"}]},"uuid":"84588688-9e2d-4917-9918-aeb4fcda59d6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.121Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a04af1ae-0a04-44bf-a1b2-ba7638973cd2","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"84588688-9e2d-4917-9918-aeb4fcda59d6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0116w4tw1g2e8q4N1VBMmda1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"subagent.driven.development|subagent-driven","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2670,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2670,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHKhysF9Bre2ZyFLZ8","type":"assistant","uuid":"bac6785c-8edd-4447-ac80-caf4b418d491","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.560Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bac6785c-8edd-4447-ac80-caf4b418d491","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","uuid":"b5934866-6e73-4ec4-bf42-0b3e0deecdb3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.561Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b5934866-6e73-4ec4-bf42-0b3e0deecdb3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","toolUseID":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.665Z","uuid":"a5603f00-c757-483f-813d-e948bd5dd78c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bac6785c-8edd-4447-ac80-caf4b418d491","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01DYBbBnx3xjGPW1GA1sCftE","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 11 files\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\ndocs/readmes/INDEX.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/subagent-driven-development.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/README.md\ntooling/src/checks/skills.js\nskills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md\nskills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md\nskills/run-audit/SKILL.md\nskills/executing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/README.md"}]},"uuid":"ffc74cf6-8cca-4a54-bcbe-d2615cc577d8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:53.665Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"bac6785c-8edd-4447-ac80-caf4b418d491","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ffc74cf6-8cca-4a54-bcbe-d2615cc577d8","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0116w4tw1g2e8q4N1VBMmda1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"code.review|review.*stage|review.*tier|review.*pass","output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":30},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2670,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2670,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHKhysF9Bre2ZyFLZ8","type":"assistant","uuid":"149819f4-114c-4784-abc4-df83656728aa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.383Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"149819f4-114c-4784-abc4-df83656728aa","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","uuid":"90cd8e6d-b0be-4d25-aa4f-3d9302e5c4cd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.384Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"90cd8e6d-b0be-4d25-aa4f-3d9302e5c4cd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","toolUseID":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.496Z","uuid":"da9101c6-e701-414e-9a4e-c378911cb57b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"149819f4-114c-4784-abc4-df83656728aa","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01UwwjRiJ3htytPDwXFKaMSZ","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 30 files limit: 30, offset: 0\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/discover.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/execute.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/spec-challenge.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/executor.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/clarify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/design.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/brainstorming/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\ndocs/concepts/architecture.md\ndocs/readmes/INDEX.md\nREADME.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/requesting-code-review.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/receiving-code-review.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/README.md\n.cursor-plugin/plugin.json\n.claude-plugin/plugin.json\ndocs/reference/roles-reference.md\nskills/claude-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/gemini-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/codex-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/prepare-next/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/prepare-next.md"}]},"uuid":"54876c1e-8195-4557-8aba-1bd01c9e2360","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.496Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"149819f4-114c-4784-abc4-df83656728aa","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"54876c1e-8195-4557-8aba-1bd01c9e2360","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0116w4tw1g2e8q4N1VBMmda1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"codex.*review|review.*codex|external.*review","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2670,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2670,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHKhysF9Bre2ZyFLZ8","type":"assistant","uuid":"193b6c68-a5f3-4b11-a42e-65f80af20801","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.912Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"193b6c68-a5f3-4b11-a42e-65f80af20801","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","uuid":"071524d1-1486-4c4d-9092-cf864492c5cd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.912Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"071524d1-1486-4c4d-9092-cf864492c5cd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","toolUseID":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.998Z","uuid":"9320458c-badd-4450-801f-62b5082db681","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"193b6c68-a5f3-4b11-a42e-65f80af20801","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01GPoBTVdRTnohQhcAjqkSGa","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 18 files\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\nskills/init-pipeline/SKILL.md\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\nCHANGELOG.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/README.md\nskills/codex-cli/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\nskills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md\nskills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md\nskills/executing-plans/SKILL.md\ntooling/src/checks/ac-matrix.js\nexpertise/security/infrastructure/incident-response.md"}]},"uuid":"ff9a2eb6-250a-430d-884a-0ca1a6d61df3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.998Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"193b6c68-a5f3-4b11-a42e-65f80af20801","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ff9a2eb6-250a-430d-884a-0ca1a6d61df3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EsJWizQwPpY2YZ2akssg77","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me read the key files to understand the current implementation."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1488,"cache_read_input_tokens":10415,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1488,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJGH8QL8XLSoDKga7A","type":"assistant","uuid":"4d9bd726-9cde-4784-a2c2-c441c54664df","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:03.922Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4d9bd726-9cde-4784-a2c2-c441c54664df","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EsJWizQwPpY2YZ2akssg77","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1488,"cache_read_input_tokens":10415,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1488,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJGH8QL8XLSoDKga7A","type":"assistant","uuid":"062f6e2a-34a6-452c-a4b6-ed929eaacc7f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.138Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"062f6e2a-34a6-452c-a4b6-ed929eaacc7f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","parentToolUseID":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","uuid":"094ae778-a77f-4078-8554-ab372bbd80e6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.138Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"094ae778-a77f-4078-8554-ab372bbd80e6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","toolUseID":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.194Z","uuid":"1b214148-b4c8-4f4e-b0f7-c175f2811deb","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"062f6e2a-34a6-452c-a4b6-ed929eaacc7f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_019VtCYc44ekg2gSeJQExFLG","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:subagent-driven-development\n     3→description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Subagent-Driven Development\n     7→\n     8→## Command Routing\n     9→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    10→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    11→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    12→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    13→\n    14→## Codebase Exploration\n    15→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    16→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    17→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    18→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    19→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    20→\n    21→Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n    22→\n    23→**Why subagents:** You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.\n    24→\n    25→**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n    26→\n    27→## When to Use\n    28→\n    29→```dot\n    30→digraph when_to_use {\n    31→    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    32→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    33→    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    34→    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    35→    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    36→    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n    37→\n    38→    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    39→    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    40→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    41→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    42→    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    43→    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n    44→}\n    45→```\n    46→\n    47→**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n    48→- Same session (no context switch)\n    49→- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n    50→- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n    51→- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n    52→\n    53→## The Process\n    54→\n    55→```dot\n    56→digraph process {\n    57→    rankdir=TB;\n    58→\n    59→    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n    60→        label=\"Per Task\";\n    61→        \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" [shape=box];\n    62→        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    63→        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n    64→        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n    65→        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n    66→        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    67→        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n    68→        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n    69→        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    70→        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n    71→        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n    72→        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    73→    }\n    74→\n    75→    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    76→    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    77→    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    78→    \"Use wz:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n    79→\n    80→    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\";\n    81→    \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    82→    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    83→    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    84→    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\";\n    85→    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    86→    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    87→    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    88→    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    89→    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    90→    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    91→    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    92→    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    93→    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    94→    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    95→    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    96→    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    97→    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    98→    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use wz:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n    99→}\n   100→```\n   101→\n   102→### Code Review Scoping\n   103→\n   104→The implementer subagent commits before review. The spec reviewer and code quality reviewer must use `codex review --base <pre-task-sha>` to scope their review to the task's changes. Capture `PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)` before dispatching the implementer.\n   105→\n   106→### Review Loop Alignment\n   107→\n   108→Both review stages follow the review loop pattern in `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` with explicit `--mode task-review`:\n   109→- **Spec compliance review:** Uses spec dimensions with `--mode task-review`\n   110→- **Code quality review:** Uses 5 task-execution dimensions with `--mode task-review`\n   111→\n   112→Review logs use task-scoped filenames: `execute-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md`\n   113→\n   114→Each review stage respects the loop cap via `wazir capture loop-check --task-id <NNN>`. If the cap is reached (exit 43), escalate to the controller (you) for a decision.\n   115→\n   116→### Codex Error Handling\n   117→\n   118→If codex exits non-zero during review, log the error, mark the pass as codex-unavailable, and use self-review findings only. Do not treat a Codex failure as a clean pass.\n   119→\n   120→**Standalone mode:** When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` exists, review logs go to `docs/plans/`.\n   121→\n   122→## Prompt Templates\n   123→\n   124→- `./implementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n   125→- `./spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n   126→- `./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n   127→\n   128→## Advantages\n   129→\n   130→**vs. Manual execution:**\n   131→- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n   132→- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n   133→- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n   134→- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n   135→\n   136→**vs. Executing Plans:**\n   137→- Same session (no handoff)\n   138→- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n   139→- Review checkpoints automatic\n   140→\n   141→**Efficiency gains:**\n   142→- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n   143→- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n   144→- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n   145→- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n   146→\n   147→**Quality gates:**\n   148→- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n   149→- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n   150→- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n   151→- Spec compliance prevents over/under-building\n   152→- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n   153→\n   154→**Cost:**\n   155→- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n   156→- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n   157→- Review loops add iterations\n   158→- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n   159→\n   160→## Red Flags\n   161→\n   162→**Never:**\n   163→- Start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent\n   164→- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n   165→- Proceed with unfixed issues\n   166→- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n   167→- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n   168→- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n   169→- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n   170→- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n   171→- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n   172→- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n   173→- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)\n   174→- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n   175→- **Review the wrong diff -- always scope to the current task's changes using --base**\n   176→\n   177→**If subagent asks questions:**\n   178→- Answer clearly and completely\n   179→- Provide additional context if needed\n   180→- Don't rush them into implementation\n   181→\n   182→**If reviewer finds issues:**\n   183→- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n   184→- Reviewer reviews again\n   185→- Repeat until approved\n   186→- Don't skip the re-review\n   187→\n   188→**If subagent fails task:**\n   189→- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n   190→- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n   191→"}]},"uuid":"5c97be08-d901-45df-85d7-2497075d153b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.194Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"062f6e2a-34a6-452c-a4b6-ed929eaacc7f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5c97be08-d901-45df-85d7-2497075d153b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EsJWizQwPpY2YZ2akssg77","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1488,"cache_read_input_tokens":10415,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1488,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJGH8QL8XLSoDKga7A","type":"assistant","uuid":"95d74aaa-0b9b-484e-8027-7e1c474a65da","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.609Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95d74aaa-0b9b-484e-8027-7e1c474a65da","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","uuid":"ca4bcd02-3a65-4c8a-8931-0541c92062eb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:04.611Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ca4bcd02-3a65-4c8a-8931-0541c92062eb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EsJWizQwPpY2YZ2akssg77","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1488,"cache_read_input_tokens":10415,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1488,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJGH8QL8XLSoDKga7A","type":"assistant","uuid":"ac660447-d6a2-4d91-acbc-a51bc24979c2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.108Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ac660447-d6a2-4d91-acbc-a51bc24979c2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","uuid":"fdceb5d7-62c8-41c5-987c-c07795673aeb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.108Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fdceb5d7-62c8-41c5-987c-c07795673aeb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","toolUseID":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.168Z","uuid":"a70e56ee-857a-4122-8242-72d75baf1a79","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ac660447-d6a2-4d91-acbc-a51bc24979c2","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Gz1iDr56mJJ1bmFU83EU9a","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:requesting-code-review\n     3→description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Requesting Code Review\n     7→\n     8→## Command Routing\n     9→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    10→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    11→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    12→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    13→\n    14→## Codebase Exploration\n    15→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    16→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    17→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    18→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    19→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    20→\n    21→Dispatch wz:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.\n    22→\n    23→**Core principle:** Review early, review often. Review follows the loop pattern in `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`. Dispatch the reviewer with explicit `--mode` and depth-aware loop parameters.\n    24→\n    25→## When to Request Review\n    26→\n    27→**Mandatory:**\n    28→- After each task in subagent-driven development\n    29→- After completing major feature\n    30→- Before merge to main\n    31→\n    32→**Optional but valuable:**\n    33→- When stuck (fresh perspective)\n    34→- Before refactoring (baseline check)\n    35→- After fixing complex bug\n    36→\n    37→## How to Request\n    38→\n    39→**1. Get git SHAs and scope the review:**\n    40→\n    41→Use `--uncommitted` for uncommitted changes, `--base <sha>` for committed changes.\n    42→\n    43→```bash\n    44→# For committed changes:\n    45→BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or origin/main\n    46→HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n    47→codex review --base $BASE_SHA\n    48→\n    49→# For uncommitted changes:\n    50→codex review --uncommitted\n    51→```\n    52→\n    53→**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent with loop config:**\n    54→\n    55→Use Task tool with wz:code-reviewer type, fill template at `./code-reviewer.md`\n    56→\n    57→Include explicit loop parameters:\n    58→- `--mode` (e.g., `task-review`, `final`)\n    59→- Depth-aware dimensions and cap from `phase_policy`\n    60→- Review pass number (for log filenames)\n    61→\n    62→**Placeholders:**\n    63→- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built\n    64→- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do\n    65→- `{BASE_SHA}` - Starting commit\n    66→- `{HEAD_SHA}` - Ending commit\n    67→- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary\n    68→- `{REVIEW_MODE}` - Explicit review mode (e.g., task-review)\n    69→\n    70→**3. Act on feedback:**\n    71→- Fix Critical issues immediately\n    72→- Fix Important issues before proceeding\n    73→- Note Minor issues for later\n    74→- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)\n    75→\n    76→### Codex Error Handling\n    77→\n    78→If codex exits non-zero during review, log the error, mark the pass as codex-unavailable, and use self-review findings only. Do not treat a Codex failure as a clean pass.\n    79→\n    80→## Example\n    81→\n    82→```\n    83→[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n    84→\n    85→You: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n    86→\n    87→BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep \"Task 1\" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')\n    88→HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n    89→\n    90→[Dispatch wz:code-reviewer subagent with --mode task-review]\n    91→  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n    92→  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md\n    93→  BASE_SHA: a7981ec\n    94→  HEAD_SHA: 3df7661\n    95→  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n    96→  REVIEW_MODE: task-review\n    97→\n    98→[Subagent returns]:\n    99→  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n   100→  Issues:\n   101→    Important: Missing progress indicators\n   102→    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n   103→  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n   104→\n   105→You: [Fix progress indicators]\n   106→[Continue to Task 3]\n   107→```\n   108→\n   109→## Integration with Workflows\n   110→\n   111→**Subagent-Driven Development:**\n   112→- Review after EACH task\n   113→- Catch issues before they compound\n   114→- Fix before moving to next task\n   115→\n   116→**Executing Plans:**\n   117→- Review after each task (per-task review checkpoint)\n   118→- Get feedback, apply, continue\n   119→\n   120→**Ad-Hoc Development:**\n   121→- Review before merge\n   122→- Review when stuck\n   123→\n   124→## Red Flags\n   125→\n   126→**Never:**\n   127→- Skip review because \"it's simple\"\n   128→- Ignore Critical issues\n   129→- Proceed with unfixed Important issues\n   130→- Argue with valid technical feedback\n   131→- Dispatch review without explicit `--mode`\n   132→\n   133→**If reviewer wrong:**\n   134→- Push back with technical reasoning\n   135→- Show code/tests that prove it works\n   136→- Request clarification\n   137→\n   138→See template at: ./code-reviewer.md\n   139→"}]},"uuid":"c49cd0f3-af41-44d1-a7cb-e66e8797a462","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.168Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ac660447-d6a2-4d91-acbc-a51bc24979c2","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c49cd0f3-af41-44d1-a7cb-e66e8797a462","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EsJWizQwPpY2YZ2akssg77","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1488,"cache_read_input_tokens":10415,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1488,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJGH8QL8XLSoDKga7A","type":"assistant","uuid":"ee854436-0bf5-4c3b-80cb-1d8364b83f6e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.613Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ee854436-0bf5-4c3b-80cb-1d8364b83f6e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","parentToolUseID":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","uuid":"c2ea412d-2b66-4590-aceb-657e82d985a2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:05.615Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c2ea412d-2b66-4590-aceb-657e82d985a2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","toolUseID":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.467Z","uuid":"d21693a6-f8d8-4943-bb6a-1fb57000923b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95d74aaa-0b9b-484e-8027-7e1c474a65da","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01CXrR4xp8uBgk4P5JdH4F63","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:reviewer\n     3→description: Run the review phase — adversarial review of implementation against the approved spec, plan, and verification evidence.\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Reviewer\n     7→\n     8→## Model Annotation\n     9→When multi-model mode is enabled:\n    10→- **Sonnet** for internal review passes (internal-review)\n    11→- **Opus** for final review mode (final-review)\n    12→- **Opus** for spec-challenge mode (spec-harden)\n    13→- **Opus** for design-review mode (design)\n    14→\n    15→## Command Routing\n    16→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    17→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    18→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    19→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    20→\n    21→## Codebase Exploration\n    22→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    23→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    24→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    25→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    26→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    27→\n    28→Run the Final Review phase — or any review mode invoked by other phases.\n    29→\n    30→The reviewer role owns all review loops across the pipeline: research-review, clarification-review, spec-challenge, design-review, plan-review, per-task execution review, and final review. Each uses phase-specific dimensions from `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`.\n    31→\n    32→**Key principle for `final` mode:** Compare implementation against the **ORIGINAL INPUT** (briefing + input files), NOT the task specs. The executor's per-task reviewer already validated against task specs — that concern is covered. The final reviewer catches drift: does what we built match what the user actually asked for?\n    33→\n    34→**Reviewer-owned responsibilities** (callers must NOT replicate these):\n    35→1. **Two-tier review** — internal review first (fast, cheap, expertise-loaded), Codex second (fresh eyes on clean code)\n    36→2. **Dimension selection** — the reviewer selects the correct dimension set for the review mode and depth\n    37→3. **Pass counting** — the reviewer tracks pass numbers and enforces the depth-based cap (quick=3, standard=5, deep=7)\n    38→4. **Finding attribution** — each finding is tagged `[Internal]`, `[Codex]`, or `[Both]` based on source\n    39→5. **Dimension set recording** — each review pass file records which canonical dimension set was used, enabling Phase Scoring (first vs final delta)\n    40→6. **Learning pipeline** — ALL findings (internal + Codex) feed into `state.sqlite` and the learning system\n    41→\n    42→## Review Modes\n    43→\n    44→The reviewer operates in different modes depending on the phase. Mode MUST be passed explicitly by the caller (`--mode <mode>`). The reviewer does NOT auto-detect mode from artifact availability. If `--mode` is not provided, ask the user which review to run.\n    45→\n    46→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n    47→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n    48→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts, approved spec/plan/design | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Scored verdict (PASS/FAIL) |\n    49→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    50→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    51→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan artifact | 8 plan dims (7 + input coverage) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    52→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes or `--base` SHA | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    53→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    54→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    55→\n    56→Each mode follows the review loop pattern in `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`. Pass counts are fixed by depth (quick=3, standard=5, deep=7). No extension.\n    57→\n    58→### CHANGELOG Enforcement\n    59→\n    60→In `task-review` and `final` modes, flag missing CHANGELOG entries for user-facing changes as **[warning]** severity. User-facing changes include new features, behavior changes, and bug fixes visible to users. Internal changes (refactors, tooling, tests) do not require CHANGELOG entries.\n    61→\n    62→## Prerequisites\n    63→\n    64→Prerequisites depend on the review mode:\n    65→\n    66→### `final` mode\n    67→\n    68→**Phase Prerequisites (Hard Gate):** Before proceeding, verify ALL of these artifacts exist. If ANY is missing, **STOP** and report which are missing.\n    69→\n    70→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/clarification.md`\n    71→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md`\n    72→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/design.md`\n    73→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/execution-plan.md`\n    74→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/verification-proof.md`\n    75→\n    76→If any file is missing:\n    77→\n    78→> **Cannot run final review: missing prerequisite artifacts.**\n    79→>\n    80→> Missing: [list missing files]\n    81→>\n    82→> Run `/wazir:clarifier` (for clarified/* files) or `/wazir:executor` (for verification-proof.md) first.\n    83→\n    84→1. Check `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` has completed task artifacts. If not, tell the user to run `/wazir:executor` first.\n    85→2. Read the approved spec, plan, and design from `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/`.\n    86→3. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    87→\n    88→### `task-review` mode\n    89→1. Uncommitted changes exist for the current task, or a `--base` SHA is provided for committed changes.\n    90→2. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    91→3. **Commit discipline check:** If uncommitted changes span work from multiple tasks (e.g., files from task N and task N+1 are both modified), REJECT immediately: \"REJECTED: Multiple tasks in single commit. Split into per-task commits before review.\" This is a blocking finding — no other dimensions are evaluated until resolved.\n    92→4. **Security sensitivity check:** Run `detectSecurityPatterns` from `tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js` against the diff. If `triggered === true`, add the 6 security review dimensions (injection, auth bypass, data exposure, CSRF/SSRF, XSS, secrets leakage) to the standard 5 task-execution dimensions for this review pass. Security findings use severity levels: critical (exploitable), high (likely exploitable), medium (defense-in-depth gap), low (best-practice deviation).\n    93→\n    94→### `spec-challenge`, `design-review`, `plan-review`, `research-review`, `clarification-review` modes\n    95→1. The appropriate input artifact for the mode exists.\n    96→2. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth and multi_tool settings.\n    97→3. **`plan-review` additional dimension — Input Coverage:**\n    98→   - Read the original input/briefing from `.wazir/input/briefing.md` and any `input/*.md` files\n    99→   - Count distinct items/requirements in the input\n   100→   - Count tasks in the execution plan\n   101→   - If `tasks_in_plan < items_in_input` → **HIGH** finding: \"Plan covers [N] of [M] input items. Missing: [list of uncovered items]\"\n   102→   - If `tasks_in_plan >= items_in_input` → dimension passes\n   103→   - One task MAY cover multiple input items if justified in the task description\n   104→   - This is the review-level enforcement of the \"no scope reduction\" rule\n   105→\n   106→## Review Process (`final` mode)\n   107→\n   108→**Before starting this phase, output to the user:**\n   109→\n   110→> **Final Review** — About to run adversarial 9-dimension review comparing your implementation against the original input, not just the task specs. The executor's per-task reviewer already validated correctness per-task — this catches drift between what you asked for and what was actually built.\n   111→>\n   112→> **Why this matters:** Without this, implementation drift ships undetected. Per-task review confirms each task matches its spec, but cannot catch: tasks that collectively miss the original intent, scope creep that added unrequested features, or acceptance criteria that were rewritten to match implementation instead of input.\n   113→>\n   114→> **Looking for:** Logic errors, missing features, dead code, unsubstantiated \"it works\" claims, scope creep, security gaps, stale documentation\n   115→\n   116→**Input:** Read the ORIGINAL user input (`.wazir/input/briefing.md`, `input/` directory files) and compare against what was built. This catches intent drift that task-level review misses.\n   117→\n   118→### Input Sources (read before scoring)\n   119→1. Read the original input: `.wazir/input/briefing.md` or `.wazir/runs/<id>/sources/input.md`\n   120→2. Read user feedback: `.wazir/runs/<id>/user-input-log.ndjson` (parse each JSON line)\n   121→3. Count distinct items/requirements in the original input\n   122→4. If `user-input-log.ndjson` does not exist: log a finding — \"User input not captured — cannot verify intent alignment\" (severity: warning)\n   123→\n   124→Perform adversarial review across 9 dimensions:\n   125→\n   126→1. **Correctness** — Does the code do what the original input asked for? *(catches: logic errors, wrong behavior, spec violations)*\n   127→2. **Completeness** — Are all requirements from the original input met? *(catches: missing features, unimplemented acceptance criteria, partially delivered items)*\n   128→3. **Wiring** — Are all paths connected end-to-end? *(catches: dead code, disconnected paths, missing imports, orphaned routes)*\n   129→4. **Verification** — Is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim? *(catches: false claims of \"it works\" without evidence, untested code paths, missing type coverage)*\n   130→5. **Drift** — Does the implementation match what the user originally requested? (not just the plan — the INPUT) *(catches: scope creep, plan deviations, unauthorized changes, gold-plating)*\n   131→6. **Quality** — Code style, naming, error handling, security *(catches: security vulnerabilities, poor error handling, inconsistent naming, missing input validation)*\n   132→7. **Documentation** — Changelog entries, commit messages, comments *(catches: missing changelogs, wrong commit messages, stale comments, undocumented breaking changes)*\n   133→8. **Intent Alignment** — Does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including any mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec (which may have drifted). Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction. *(catches: spec drift from user intent, ignored user corrections, misinterpreted requirements)*\n   134→9. **Scope Coverage** — Count distinct items in the original input. Count items implemented (via commits/diffs). If any input item is missing from the implementation, flag as HIGH finding with the specific missing item. Score = (implemented items / input items) * 10. *(catches: dropped requirements, partial delivery, silent scope reduction)*\n   135→\n   136→## Context Retrieval\n   137→\n   138→- Read the diff first (primary input)\n   139→- Use `wazir index search-symbols <name>` to locate related code\n   140→- Use `wazir recall symbol <name-or-id> --tier L1` to check structural alignment\n   141→- Read files directly for: logic errors, missing edge cases, integration concerns\n   142→\n   143→## Scoring (`final` mode)\n   144→\n   145→Score each dimension 0-10. Total out of 90 (9 dimensions x 10 each).\n   146→\n   147→| Verdict | Score | Action |\n   148→|---------|-------|--------|\n   149→| **PASS** | 72+ | Ready for PR or merge |\n   150→| **NEEDS MINOR FIXES** | 54-71 | Auto-fix and re-review |\n   151→| **NEEDS REWORK** | 36-53 | Re-run affected tasks |\n   152→| **FAIL** | 0-35 | Fundamental issues |\n   153→\n   154→## Two-Tier Review Flow\n   155→\n   156→The review process has two tiers. Internal review catches ~80% of issues quickly and cheaply. Codex review provides fresh eyes on clean code.\n   157→\n   158→### Tier 1: Internal Review (Fast, Cheap, Expertise-Loaded)\n   159→\n   160→1. **Compose expertise:** Load relevant expertise modules from `expertise/composition-map.yaml` into context based on the review mode and detected stack. This gives the internal reviewer domain-specific knowledge.\n   161→2. **Run internal review** using the dimension set for the current mode. When multi-model is enabled, use **Sonnet** (not Opus) for internal review passes — it's fast and good enough for pattern matching against expertise.\n   162→3. **Produce findings:** Each finding is tagged `[Internal]` with severity (blocking, warning, note).\n   163→4. **Fix cycle:** If blocking findings exist, the executor fixes them. Re-run internal review. Repeat until clean or cap reached.\n   164→\n   165→Internal review passes are logged to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<mode>-internal-pass-<N>.md`.\n   166→\n   167→### Tier 2: External Review (Fresh Eyes on Clean Code)\n   168→\n   169→Only runs AFTER Tier 1 produces a clean pass (no blocking findings).\n   170→\n   171→Read `.wazir/state/config.json`. If `multi_tool.tools` includes external reviewers:\n   172→\n   173→#### Codex Review\n   174→\n   175→**For detailed Codex CLI usage, see `wz:codex-cli` skill.**\n   176→\n   177→If `codex` is in `multi_tool.tools`:\n   178→\n   179→1. Run Codex review against the current changes:\n   180→   ```bash\n   181→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   182→   CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   183→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Wazir review: <brief summary>\" \\\n   184→     \"Review against these acceptance criteria: <paste criteria from spec>\" \\\n   185→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/codex-review.md\n   186→   ```\n   187→   Or if changes are committed:\n   188→   ```bash\n   189→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   190→   CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   191→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <base-branch> --title \"Wazir review: <brief summary>\" \\\n   192→     \"Review against these acceptance criteria: <paste criteria from spec>\" \\\n   193→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/codex-review.md\n   194→   ```\n   195→\n   196→2. **Extract findings only** (context protection): After tee, use `execute_file` to extract only the final findings from the Codex output (everything after the last `codex` marker). If context-mode is unavailable, use `tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2`. If no marker found, fail closed (0 findings, warn user). See `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` \"Codex Output Context Protection\" for full protocol.\n   197→3. Incorporate extracted Codex findings into your scoring — if Codex flags something you missed, add it. If you disagree with a Codex finding, note it with your rationale.\n   198→\n   199→**Codex error handling:** If codex exits non-zero (auth/rate-limit/transport failure), log the full stderr, mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log, and use internal review findings only for that pass. Do NOT treat a Codex failure as a clean review. Do NOT skip the pass. The next pass still attempts Codex (transient failures may recover).\n   200→\n   201→**Code review scoping by mode:**\n   202→- Use `--uncommitted` when reviewing uncommitted changes (`task-review` mode).\n   203→- Use `--base <sha>` when reviewing committed changes.\n   204→- Use `codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\"` with stdin pipe for non-code artifacts (`spec-challenge`, `design-review`, `plan-review`, `research-review`, `clarification-review` modes).\n   205→- See `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` for code review scoping rules.\n   206→\n   207→#### Gemini Review\n   208→\n   209→If `gemini` is in `multi_tool.tools`, follow the same pattern using the Gemini CLI when available. **For detailed Gemini CLI usage, see `wz:gemini-cli` skill.**\n   210→\n   211→### Fix Cycle (Codex Findings)\n   212→\n   213→If Codex produces blocking findings:\n   214→1. Executor fixes the Codex findings\n   215→2. Re-run internal review (quick pass) to verify fixes didn't introduce regressions\n   216→3. Optionally re-run Codex for a clean pass\n   217→\n   218→### Merging Findings\n   219→\n   220→The final review report must clearly attribute each finding:\n   221→- `[Internal]` — found by Tier 1 internal review\n   222→- `[Codex]` — found by Tier 2 Codex review\n   223→- `[Gemini]` — found by Tier 2 Gemini review\n   224→- `[Both]` — found independently by multiple sources\n   225→\n   226→### Finding Persistence (Learning Pipeline)\n   227→\n   228→ALL findings from both tiers are persisted to `state.sqlite` for cross-run learning:\n   229→\n   230→```javascript\n   231→// After each review pass\n   232→const { insertFinding, getRecurringFindingHashes } = require('tooling/src/state/db');\n   233→const db = openStateDb(stateRoot);\n   234→\n   235→for (const finding of allFindings) {\n   236→  insertFinding(db, {\n   237→    run_id: runId,\n   238→    phase: reviewMode,\n   239→    source: finding.attribution, // 'internal', 'codex', 'gemini'\n   240→    severity: finding.severity,\n   241→    description: finding.description,\n   242→    finding_hash: hashFinding(finding.description),\n   243→  });\n   244→}\n   245→\n   246→// Check for recurring patterns\n   247→const recurring = getRecurringFindingHashes(db, 2);\n   248→// Recurring findings → auto-propose as learnings in the learn phase\n   249→```\n   250→\n   251→This is how Wazir evolves — findings that recur across runs become accepted learnings injected into future executor context, preventing the same mistakes.\n   252→\n   253→## Interaction Mode Awareness\n   254→\n   255→Read `interaction_mode` from run-config:\n   256→\n   257→- **`auto`:** No user checkpoints. Present verdict and let gating agent decide. On escalation, write reason and STOP.\n   258→- **`guided`:** Standard behavior — present verdict, ask user how to proceed.\n   259→- **`interactive`:** Discuss findings with user: \"I found a potential auth bypass in `src/auth.js:42` — here's why I rated it high severity. Do you agree, or is there context I'm missing?\" Show detailed reasoning for each dimension score.\n   260→\n   261→## CLI/Context-Mode Enforcement\n   262→\n   263→In ALL review modes, check for these violations:\n   264→\n   265→1. **Index usage enforcement:** If the agent performed >5 direct file reads (Read tool) without a preceding `wazir index search-symbols` query, flag as **[warning]** finding: \"Agent performed [N] direct file reads without using wazir index. Use `wazir index search-symbols <query>` before reading files to reduce context consumption.\"\n   266→\n   267→2. **Context-mode enforcement:** If the agent ran a large-category command (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting — as classified by `hooks/routing-matrix.json`) using native Bash instead of context-mode tools (when context-mode is available), flag as **[warning]** finding: \"Large command `[cmd]` run without context-mode. Route through `mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute` to reduce context usage.\"\n   268→\n   269→These are warnings, not blocking findings — they improve efficiency but don't affect correctness.\n   270→\n   271→## Task-Review Log Filenames\n   272→\n   273→In `task-review` mode, use task-scoped log filenames and cap tracking:\n   274→- Log filenames: `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md`\n   275→- Cap tracking: `wazir capture loop-check --task-id <NNN>` (each task has its own independent cap counter)\n   276→\n   277→## Output\n   278→\n   279→Save review results to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/review.md` with:\n   280→- Findings with severity (blocking, warning, note)\n   281→- Rationale tied to evidence\n   282→- Score breakdown\n   283→- Verdict\n   284→\n   285→Run the phase report and display it to the user:\n   286→```bash\n   287→wazir report phase --run <run-id> --phase <review-mode>\n   288→```\n   289→\n   290→Output the report content to the user in the conversation.\n   291→\n   292→## Phase Report Generation\n   293→\n   294→After completing any review pass, generate a phase report following `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`:\n   295→\n   296→1. **`attempted_actions`** — Populate from the review findings. Each finding becomes an action entry:\n   297→   - `description`: the finding summary\n   298→   - `outcome`: `\"success\"` if the finding passed, `\"fail\"` if it is a blocking issue, `\"uncertain\"` if ambiguous\n   299→   - `evidence`: the rationale or evidence supporting the outcome\n   300→\n   301→2. **`drift_analysis`** — Compare review findings against the approved spec:\n   302→   - `delta`: count of deviations between implementation and spec (0 = no drift)\n   303→   - `description`: summary of any drift detected and its impact\n   304→\n   305→3. **`quality_metrics`** — Populate from test, lint, and type-check results gathered during review:\n   306→   - `test_pass_count`, `test_fail_count`: from test runner output\n   307→   - `lint_errors`: from linter output\n   308→   - `type_errors`: from type checker output\n   309→\n   310→4. **`risk_flags`** — Populate from any high-severity findings:\n   311→   - `severity`: `\"low\"`, `\"medium\"`, or `\"high\"`\n   312→   - `description`: what the risk is\n   313→   - `mitigation`: recommended mitigation (if known)\n   314→\n   315→5. **`decisions`** — Populate from any scope or approach decisions made during the review:\n   316→   - `description`: what was decided\n   317→   - `rationale`: why\n   318→   - `alternatives_considered`: other options evaluated (optional)\n   319→   - `source`: `\"[Wazir]\"`, `\"[Codex]\"`, or `\"[Both]\"` (optional)\n   320→\n   321→6. **`verdict_recommendation`** — Set based on the gating rules in `config/gating-rules.yaml`:\n   322→   - `verdict`: `\"continue\"` (PASS), `\"loop_back\"` (NEEDS MINOR FIXES / NEEDS REWORK), or `\"escalate\"` (FAIL with fundamental issues)\n   323→   - `reasoning`: brief explanation of why this verdict was chosen\n   324→\n   325→### Report Output Paths\n   326→\n   327→Save reports to two formats under the run directory:\n   328→- `.wazir/runs/<id>/reports/phase-<name>-report.json` — machine-readable, validated against `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`\n   329→- `.wazir/runs/<id>/reports/phase-<name>-report.md` — human-readable Markdown summary\n   330→\n   331→The gating agent (`tooling/src/gating/agent.js`) consumes the JSON report to decide: **continue**, **loop_back**, or **escalate**.\n   332→\n   333→### Report Fields Reference\n   334→\n   335→All required fields per `schemas/phase-report.schema.json`:\n   336→\n   337→| Field | Type | Required | Description |\n   338→|-------|------|----------|-------------|\n   339→| `phase_name` | string | yes | Review mode name (e.g., `\"final\"`, `\"task-review\"`) |\n   340→| `run_id` | string | yes | Current run identifier |\n   341→| `timestamp` | string (date-time) | yes | ISO 8601 timestamp of report generation |\n   342→| `attempted_actions` | array | yes | Findings mapped to action outcomes |\n   343→| `drift_analysis` | object | yes | Spec-vs-implementation drift summary |\n   344→| `quality_metrics` | object | yes | Test/lint/type results |\n   345→| `risk_flags` | array | yes | High-severity risk items |\n   346→| `decisions` | array | yes | Scope/approach decisions made |\n   347→| `verdict_recommendation` | object | no | Gating verdict based on `config/gating-rules.yaml` |\n   348→\n   349→## Post-Review: Learn (final mode only)\n   350→\n   351→After the final review verdict, extract durable learnings using the **learner role** (`roles/learner.md`).\n   352→\n   353→### Step 1: Gather all findings\n   354→\n   355→Collect review findings from ALL sources in this run:\n   356→- `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/reviews/` — all review pass logs (task-review, final review)\n   357→- Codex findings (attributed `[Codex]` or `[Both]`)\n   358→- Self-audit findings (if `run_audit` was enabled)\n   359→\n   360→### Step 2: Identify learning candidates\n   361→\n   362→A finding becomes a learning candidate if:\n   363→- It recurred across 2+ review passes within this run (same issue found repeatedly)\n   364→- It matches a finding from a prior run (check `memory/learnings/proposed/` and `accepted/` for similar patterns)\n   365→- It represents a class of mistake, not just a single instance (e.g., \"missing error handling in async functions\" vs \"missing try-catch on line 42\")\n   366→\n   367→### Step 3: Write learning proposals\n   368→\n   369→For each candidate, write a proposal to `memory/learnings/proposed/<run-id>-<NNN>.md`:\n   370→\n   371→```markdown\n   372→---\n   373→artifact_type: proposed_learning\n   374→phase: learn\n   375→role: learner\n   376→run_id: <run-id>\n   377→status: proposed\n   378→sources:\n   379→  - <review-file-1>\n   380→  - <review-file-2>\n   381→approval_status: required\n   382→---\n   383→\n   384→# Proposed Learning: <title>\n   385→\n   386→## Scope\n   387→- **Roles:** [which roles should receive this learning — e.g., executor, reviewer]\n   388→- **Stacks:** [which tech stacks — e.g., node, react, or \"all\"]\n   389→- **Concerns:** [which concerns — e.g., error-handling, testing, security]\n   390→\n   391→## Evidence\n   392→- [finding from review pass N: description]\n   393→- [finding from review pass M: same pattern]\n   394→- [optional: similar finding from prior run <run-id>]\n   395→\n   396→## Learning\n   397→[The concrete, actionable instruction that should be injected into future executor context]\n   398→\n   399→## Expected Benefit\n   400→[What this prevents in future runs]\n   401→\n   402→## Confidence\n   403→- **Level:** low | medium | high\n   404→- **Basis:** [single run observation | multi-run recurrence | user correction]\n   405→```\n   406→\n   407→### Step 4: Report\n   408→\n   409→Present proposed learnings to the user:\n   410→\n   411→> **Learnings proposed:** [count]\n   412→> - [title 1] (confidence: high, scope: executor/node)\n   413→> - [title 2] (confidence: medium, scope: reviewer/all)\n   414→>\n   415→> Proposals saved to `memory/learnings/proposed/`. Review and accept with `/wazir audit learnings`.\n   416→\n   417→Learnings are NEVER auto-applied. They require explicit user acceptance before being injected into future runs.\n   418→\n   419→## Post-Review: Prepare Next (final mode only)\n   420→\n   421→After learning extraction, invoke the `prepare-next` skill to prepare the handoff:\n   422→\n   423→### Handoff document\n   424→\n   425→Write to `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/handoff.md`:\n   426→\n   427→```markdown\n   428→# Handoff — <run-id>\n   429→\n   430→**Status:** [Completed | Partial]\n   431→**Branch:** <branch-name>\n   432→**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD\n   433→\n   434→## What Was Done\n   435→[List of completed tasks with commit hashes]\n   436→\n   437→## Test Results\n   438→[Test count, pass/fail, validator status]\n   439→\n   440→## Review Score\n   441→[Final review verdict and score]\n   442→\n   443→## What's Next\n   444→[Pending items, deferred work, follow-up tasks]\n   445→\n   446→## Open Bugs\n   447→[Any known issues discovered during this run]\n   448→\n   449→## Learnings From This Run\n   450→[Key insights — what worked, what didn't, what to change]\n   451→```\n   452→\n   453→### Cleanup\n   454→\n   455→- Archive verbose intermediate review logs (compress to summary)\n   456→- Update `.wazir/runs/latest` symlink if creating a new run\n   457→- Do NOT mutate `input/` — it belongs to the user\n   458→- Do NOT auto-load proposed learnings into the next run\n   459→\n   460→## Reasoning Output\n   461→\n   462→Throughout the reviewer phase, produce reasoning at two layers:\n   463→\n   464→### User Output: Before Review\n   465→\n   466→```\n   467→Running [N]-dimension adversarial review against the original input.\n   468→Why: without this, implementation drift from your request ships undetected.\n   469→Checking: [dimension list]\n   470→```\n   471→\n   472→### User Output: Per Dimension\n   473→\n   474→```\n   475→[Dimension]: [score]/10 — [specific reason citing evidence from the code]\n   476→```\n   477→\n   478→### User Output: After Review\n   479→\n   480→```\n   481→Review complete. Verdict: [PASS/FAIL] ([score]/[max])\n   482→[N] findings across [M] dimensions.\n   483→Most critical: [top finding summary]\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→**File (Layer 2):** Write `.wazir/runs/<id>/reasoning/phase-reviewer-reasoning.md` with structured entries:\n   487→- **Trigger** — what prompted the finding (e.g., \"diff adds SQL query without parameterization\")\n   488→- **Options considered** — severity options, fix approaches\n   489→- **Chosen** — assigned severity and recommendation\n   490→- **Reasoning** — why this severity level\n   491→- **Confidence** — high/medium/low\n   492→- **Counterfactual** — what would ship if this finding were missed\n   493→\n   494→Key reviewer reasoning moments: severity assignments, PASS/FAIL decisions, dimension score justifications, and escalation decisions.\n   495→\n   496→## Done\n   497→\n   498→**After completing this phase, output to the user:**\n   499→\n   500→> **Final Review complete.**\n   501→>\n   502→> **Found:** [N] findings across 9 dimensions — [N] blocking, [N] warnings, [N] notes. Score: [score]/90 ([VERDICT]).\n   503→>\n   504→> **Without this phase:** [N] blocking issues would have shipped — including [specific examples: e.g., \"missing error handler on /api/users endpoint\", \"auth middleware not wired to 3 routes\", \"CHANGELOG missing entry for breaking API change\"]\n   505→>\n   506→> **Changed because of this work:** [List of issues caught and fixed during review passes, score improvement from first to final pass]\n   507→\n   508→Present the verdict and offer next steps:\n   509→\n   510→> **Review complete: [VERDICT] ([score]/90)**\n   511→>\n   512→> [Score breakdown and findings summary]\n   513→>\n   514→> **Learnings proposed:** [count] (see `memory/learnings/proposed/`)\n   515→> **Handoff:** `.wazir/runs/<run-id>/handoff.md`\n   516→\n   517→Ask the user via AskUserQuestion:\n   518→- **Question:** \"How would you like to proceed with the review results?\"\n   519→- **Options:**\n   520→  1. \"Create a PR\" *(Recommended if PASS)*\n   521→  2. \"Auto-fix and re-review\" *(Recommended if MINOR FIXES)*\n   522→  3. \"Review findings in detail\"\n   523→\n   524→Wait for the user's selection before continuing.\n   525→"}]},"uuid":"6cfeca13-5135-4b3d-aff5-cdaea69561f7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.467Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"95d74aaa-0b9b-484e-8027-7e1c474a65da","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6cfeca13-5135-4b3d-aff5-cdaea69561f7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","toolUseID":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:13.187Z","uuid":"9ccd3862-8dbb-4402-b784-0c631e229021","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ee854436-0bf5-4c3b-80cb-1d8364b83f6e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_016i6CAZ2JY8wh2TzSJs8J81","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Review Loop Pattern Reference\n     2→\n     3→Canonical reference for the review loop pattern used across all Wazir pipeline phases. Skills and workflows link to this document rather than embedding loop logic inline.\n     4→\n     5→---\n     6→\n     7→## Core Principle: Producer-Reviewer Separation\n     8→\n     9→The producer skill (clarifier, planner, designer, etc.) **emits** an artifact and calls for review. The **reviewer role** owns the review loop. The producer receives findings and resolves them. No role reviews its own output.\n    10→\n    11→```\n    12→Producer emits artifact\n    13→  -> Reviewer runs review loop (N passes, Codex if available)\n    14→  -> Findings returned to producer\n    15→  -> Producer fixes and resubmits\n    16→  -> Loop until all passes exhausted or cap reached\n    17→  -> Escalate to user if cap exceeded\n    18→```\n    19→\n    20→When Codex is available, the reviewer role delegates to `codex review` as a secondary input while maintaining its own independent primary verdict.\n    21→\n    22→---\n    23→\n    24→## Per-Task Review vs Final Review\n    25→\n    26→These are two structurally different constructs:\n    27→\n    28→| | Per-Task Review | Final Review |\n    29→|---|---|---|\n    30→| **When** | During execution, after each task | After all execution + verification complete |\n    31→| **Dimensions** | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | 9 scored dims (correctness, completeness, wiring, verification, drift, quality, documentation, intent alignment, scope coverage) |\n    32→| **Scope** | Single task's uncommitted changes | Entire implementation vs spec/plan |\n    33→| **Output** | Pass/fix loop, no score | Scored verdict (0-90), PASS/FAIL |\n    34→| **Workflow** | Inline in execution flow | `workflows/review.md` |\n    35→| **Skill** | `wz:reviewer` in `task-review` mode | `wz:reviewer` in `final` mode |\n    36→| **Log filename** | `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` | `final-review.md` |\n    37→\n    38→---\n    39→\n    40→## Standalone Mode\n    41→\n    42→When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` directory exists (standalone skill invocation outside a pipeline run):\n    43→\n    44→1. **Review loops still run** -- the review logic is embedded in the skill, not dependent on run state.\n    45→2. **Artifact location** -- artifacts live in `docs/plans/`. This is the canonical standalone artifact path.\n    46→3. **Review log location** -- review logs go alongside the artifact: `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md`. No temp dir.\n    47→4. **Loop cap is SKIPPED entirely** -- no `wazir capture loop-check` call. The loop runs for exactly `pass_counts[depth]` passes (3/5/7) and stops. No cap guard, no fallback constant.\n    48→5. **`wazir capture loop-check`** -- not invoked in standalone mode. The standalone detection happens before the cap guard call.\n    49→\n    50→Detection logic:\n    51→\n    52→```\n    53→if .wazir/runs/latest/ exists:\n    54→  run_mode = \"pipeline\"\n    55→  log_dir = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/\n    56→  cap_guard = wazir capture loop-check (full guard)\n    57→else:\n    58→  run_mode = \"standalone\"\n    59→  artifact_dir = docs/plans/\n    60→  log_dir = docs/plans/  (alongside artifact)\n    61→  cap_guard = none (depth pass count is the only limit)\n    62→```\n    63→\n    64→---\n    65→\n    66→## Review Loop Pseudocode\n    67→\n    68→```\n    69→review_loop(artifact_path, phase, dimensions[], depth, config, options={}):\n    70→\n    71→  # options.mode      -- explicit review mode (required)\n    72→  # options.task_id   -- task identifier for task-scoped reviews (optional)\n    73→\n    74→  # Standalone detection\n    75→  run_mode = detect_run_mode()  # \"pipeline\" or \"standalone\"\n    76→\n    77→  # Fixed pass counts -- no extension\n    78→  pass_counts = { quick: 3, standard: 5, deep: 7 }\n    79→  total_passes = pass_counts[depth]\n    80→\n    81→  # Depth-aware dimension subsets (coverage contract)\n    82→  depth_dimensions = {\n    83→    quick:    dimensions[0:3],     # first 3 dimensions only\n    84→    standard: dimensions[0:5],     # first 5\n    85→    deep:     dimensions,          # all available\n    86→  }\n    87→  active_dims = depth_dimensions[depth]\n    88→\n    89→  codex_available = check_codex()  # which codex && codex --version\n    90→\n    91→  for pass_number in 0..total_passes-1:\n    92→\n    93→    # --- Cap guard check (pipeline mode only, before each pass) ---\n    94→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n    95→      loop_check_args = \"--run <run-id> --phase <phase> --loop-count <pass_number+1>\"\n    96→      if options.task_id:\n    97→        loop_check_args += \" --task-id <task_id>\"\n    98→      wazir capture loop-check $loop_check_args\n    99→      # loop-check wraps: event capture + evaluateLoopCapGuard\n   100→      # If loop_cap_guard fires (exit 43), stop immediately:\n   101→      if last_exit_code == 43:\n   102→        log(\"Loop cap reached for phase: <phase>. Escalating to user.\")\n   103→        escalate_to_user(evidence_gathered_so_far)\n   104→        return { pass_count: pass_number, escalated: true }\n   105→    # Standalone mode: no cap guard. Loop runs for total_passes and stops.\n   106→\n   107→    dimension = active_dims[pass_number % len(active_dims)]\n   108→\n   109→    # --- Primary review (reviewer role, not producer) ---\n   110→    # Mode is always explicit -- passed by caller via options.mode\n   111→    findings = self_review(artifact_path, focus=dimension, mode=options.mode)\n   112→\n   113→    # --- Secondary review (Codex, if available) ---\n   114→    if codex_available:\n   115→      codex_exit_code, codex_output = run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension)\n   116→      if codex_exit_code != 0:\n   117→        # Codex failed -- log error, fall back to self-review for this pass\n   118→        log_error(\"Codex exited \" + codex_exit_code + \": \" + codex_output.stderr)\n   119→        mark_pass_codex_unavailable(pass_number)\n   120→        # Do NOT treat Codex failure as clean. Self-review findings stand alone.\n   121→      else:\n   122→        codex_findings = parse(codex_output.stdout)\n   123→        merge(findings, codex_findings, preserve_attribution=true)\n   124→\n   125→    # --- Log the review pass ---\n   126→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n   127→      if options.task_id:\n   128→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-task-<task_id>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   129→      else:\n   130→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   131→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   132→    else:\n   133→      log_path = docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   134→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   135→\n   136→    if findings.has_issues:\n   137→      # --- Fix and re-submit (MANDATORY) ---\n   138→      # The producer MUST fix findings and the reviewer MUST re-review.\n   139→      # \"Fix and continue without re-review\" is EXPLICITLY PROHIBITED.\n   140→      producer_fix(artifact_path, findings)\n   141→      # Continue to next pass -- the fix will be re-reviewed\n   142→\n   143→  # --- Post-loop: escalation if issues remain ---\n   144→  if remaining.has_issues:\n   145→    # Cap reached with unresolved findings. Present to user:\n   146→    # 1. Approve with known issues (Recommended if non-blocking)\n   147→    # 2. Fix manually and re-run\n   148→    # 3. Abort\n   149→    escalate_to_user(remaining, options=[\n   150→      \"approve-with-issues\",\n   151→      \"fix-manually-and-rerun\",\n   152→      \"abort\"\n   153→    ])\n   154→    # User decides. If approved, log \"user-approved-with-issues\" in final pass file.\n   155→\n   156→  return { pass_count: total_passes, issues_found, issues_fixed, remaining, attributions }\n   157→```\n   158→\n   159→Key properties of this pseudocode:\n   160→\n   161→1. **Fixed pass counts** -- Quick is exactly 3, standard exactly 5, deep exactly 7. No `max_passes = min_passes + 3`. No clean-streak early-exit. No extension.\n   162→2. **Task-scoped log filenames** -- `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` for per-task reviews, preventing log clobbering in parallel mode.\n   163→3. **Task-scoped loop cap keys** -- `--task-id` flag on `loop-check` so each task gets its own counter in `phase_loop_counts`.\n   164→4. **Explicit review mode** -- `options.mode` is always passed by the caller. No auto-detection.\n   165→5. **Codex error handling** -- non-zero exit is logged, pass marked `codex-unavailable`, self-review findings used alone. Never treated as clean.\n   166→6. **Standalone mode** -- uses `docs/plans/` for artifacts and logs. No temp dir. No cap guard at all.\n   167→\n   168→---\n   169→\n   170→## Codex Error Handling Contract\n   171→\n   172→```\n   173→run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension):\n   174→  CODEX_MODEL = read_config('.wazir/state/config.json', '.multi_tool.codex.model') or \"gpt-5.4\"\n   175→\n   176→  if is_code_artifact:\n   177→    cmd = codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"...\" \"Review for [dimension]...\"\n   178→    # or: codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <sha> for committed changes\n   179→  else:\n   180→    cmd = cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this [type] for [dimension]...\"\n   181→\n   182→  result = execute(cmd, timeout=120s, capture_stderr=true)\n   183→\n   184→  if result.exit_code != 0:\n   185→    return (result.exit_code, { stderr: result.stderr, stdout: \"\" })\n   186→    # Caller handles: log error, mark codex-unavailable, use self-review only\n   187→\n   188→  return (0, { stdout: result.stdout, stderr: result.stderr })\n   189→```\n   190→\n   191→Rules:\n   192→\n   193→- If Codex exits non-zero, log the full stderr.\n   194→- Mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log metadata.\n   195→- Fall back to self-review for that pass only. Do not skip the pass.\n   196→- Do not retry Codex on the same pass. If Codex fails on pass 2, pass 3 still tries Codex (transient failures recover).\n   197→- Never treat a Codex failure as a clean review pass.\n   198→\n   199→---\n   200→\n   201→## Codex Availability Probe\n   202→\n   203→Before any Codex call, verify availability once at loop start:\n   204→\n   205→```bash\n   206→which codex >/dev/null 2>&1 && codex --version >/dev/null 2>&1\n   207→```\n   208→\n   209→If the probe fails, set `codex_available = false` for the entire loop. Fall back to self-review only. Never error out.\n   210→\n   211→Per-invocation failures (Codex available but a single call fails) are handled separately by the error contract above.\n   212→\n   213→---\n   214→\n   215→## Codex Artifact-Scoped Review\n   216→\n   217→Never use `codex review` for non-code artifacts (specs, plans, designs). Instead, pipe the artifact content via stdin:\n   218→\n   219→```bash\n   220→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   221→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   222→cat .wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md | \\\n   223→  codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this specification for: [dimension]. Be specific, cite sections. Say CLEAN if no issues.\" \\\n   224→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/spec-challenge-review-pass-N.md\n   225→```\n   226→\n   227→For code artifacts, use `codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted` (or `--base` for committed changes). See the next section for details.\n   228→\n   229→---\n   230→\n   231→## Code Review Scoping\n   232→\n   233→**Rule: review BEFORE commit.**\n   234→\n   235→For each task during execution:\n   236→\n   237→1. Implement the task (changes are uncommitted).\n   238→2. Review the uncommitted changes using the **5 task-execution dimensions** (NOT the 9 final-review dimensions):\n   239→   ```bash\n   240→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   241→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   242→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   243→     \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   244→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   245→   ```\n   246→3. Fix any findings (still uncommitted).\n   247→4. Re-review until all passes exhausted or cap reached.\n   248→5. **Only after review passes:** commit with conventional commit format.\n   249→\n   250→**If changes are already committed** (e.g., subagent workflow where the implementer subagent commits before review):\n   251→\n   252→```bash\n   253→# Capture the SHA before the task starts\n   254→PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n   255→\n   256→# ... subagent implements and commits ...\n   257→\n   258→# Review the committed changes against the pre-task baseline\n   259→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   260→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   261→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base $PRE_TASK_SHA --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   262→  \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   263→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   264→```\n   265→\n   266→---\n   267→\n   268→## Dimension Sets\n   269→\n   270→### Research Dimensions (5)\n   271→\n   272→1. **Coverage** -- all briefing topics researched\n   273→2. **Source quality** -- authoritative, current sources\n   274→3. **Relevance** -- research answers the actual questions\n   275→4. **Gaps** -- missing info that blocks later phases\n   276→5. **Contradictions** -- conflicting sources identified\n   277→\n   278→### Spec/Clarification Dimensions (5)\n   279→\n   280→1. **Completeness** -- all requirements covered\n   281→2. **Testability** -- each criterion verifiable\n   282→3. **Ambiguity** -- no dual-interpretation statements\n   283→4. **Assumptions** -- hidden assumptions explicit\n   284→5. **Scope creep** -- nothing beyond briefing\n   285→\n   286→### Design-Review Dimensions (5)\n   287→\n   288→Matches canonical `workflows/design-review.md`:\n   289→\n   290→1. **Spec coverage** -- does the design address every acceptance criterion with a visual component?\n   291→2. **Design-spec consistency** -- does the design introduce anything not in the spec? (scope creep check)\n   292→3. **Accessibility** -- color contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA), focus states, touch target sizes (44x44px minimum)\n   293→4. **Visual consistency** -- design tokens form a coherent system, dark/light mode alignment\n   294→5. **Exported-code fidelity** -- do exported scaffolds match the designs? Mismatches are failures here, not implementation concerns.\n   295→\n   296→### Plan Dimensions (8)\n   297→\n   298→1. **Completeness** -- all design decisions mapped to tasks\n   299→2. **Ordering** -- dependencies correct, parallelizable identified\n   300→3. **Atomicity** -- each task fits one session\n   301→4. **Testability** -- concrete verification per task\n   302→5. **Edge cases** -- error paths covered\n   303→6. **Security** -- auth, injection, data exposure\n   304→7. **Integration** -- tasks connect end-to-end\n   305→8. **Input Coverage** -- every distinct item in the original input maps to at least one task. If `tasks < input items`, HIGH finding listing missing items\n   306→\n   307→### Task Execution Dimensions (5)\n   308→\n   309→Used for per-task review during execution:\n   310→\n   311→1. **Correctness** -- code matches spec\n   312→2. **Tests** -- real tests, not mocked/faked\n   313→3. **Wiring** -- all paths connected\n   314→4. **Drift** -- matches task spec\n   315→5. **Quality** -- naming, error handling\n   316→\n   317→### Final Review Dimensions (9)\n   318→\n   319→Used for `workflows/review.md` scored gate:\n   320→\n   321→1. **Correctness** -- does the code do what the spec says?\n   322→2. **Completeness** -- are all acceptance criteria met?\n   323→3. **Wiring** -- are all paths connected end-to-end?\n   324→4. **Verification** -- is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim?\n   325→5. **Drift** -- does the implementation match the approved plan?\n   326→6. **Quality** -- code style, naming, error handling, security\n   327→7. **Documentation** -- changelog entries, commit messages, comments\n   328→8. **Intent Alignment** -- does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec. Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction.\n   329→9. **Scope Coverage** -- count distinct items in the original input vs items implemented. Flag missing items as HIGH. Score = (implemented / input items) * 10.\n   330→\n   331→The final review dimensions are the existing 9 from `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`. `workflows/review.md` is not modified by this pattern.\n   332→\n   333→---\n   334→\n   335→## Per-Depth Coverage Contract\n   336→\n   337→| Depth | Research | Spec | Design-Review | Plan | Task Execution | Final Review |\n   338→|-------|----------|------|---------------|------|----------------|--------------|\n   339→| Quick | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   340→| Standard | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   341→| Deep | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-7, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   342→\n   343→Pass counts are FIXED per depth. Quick = 3 passes, standard = 5 passes, deep = 7 passes. No extension. No early-exit. Final review is always a single scored pass across all 9 dimensions -- it is a gate, not a loop.\n   344→\n   345→---\n   346→\n   347→## Loop Cap Configuration\n   348→\n   349→The `workflow_policy` section of `run-config.yaml` (legacy: `phase_policy`) controls which workflows are enabled and sets an absolute safety ceiling per workflow. Only two fields exist: `enabled` and `loop_cap`. There is no `passes` field -- depth determines pass counts (3/5/7), not workflow policy.\n   350→\n   351→```yaml\n   352→workflow_policy:\n   353→  # Clarifier phase workflows\n   354→  discover:       { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   355→  clarify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   356→  specify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   357→  spec-challenge: { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   358→  author:         { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   359→  design:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   360→  design-review:  { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   361→  plan:           { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   362→  plan-review:    { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   363→  # Executor phase workflows\n   364→  execute:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   365→  verify:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   366→  review:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   367→  learn:          { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   368→  prepare_next:   { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   369→  run_audit:      { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   370→```\n   371→\n   372→**`loop_cap`** is an absolute safety ceiling that prevents runaway loops regardless of depth. It is checked by `wazir capture loop-check` in pipeline mode. It is NOT the same as pass count (which is determined by depth: 3/5/7). Example: depth=deep gives 7 passes, but if `loop_cap: 5`, the cap guard fires at pass 5 and escalates. This is intentional -- the operator can constrain expensive phases.\n   373→\n   374→**Adaptive workflows** (`author`, `run_audit`) default to `enabled: false`. They are activated by explicit operator config or intent detection.\n   375→\n   376→**Post-run workflows** (`learn`, `prepare_next`) default to `enabled: true`. They run as part of the Final Review phase:\n   377→\n   378→- `learn` extracts durable learnings from review findings -- recurring findings become accepted learnings.\n   379→- `prepare_next` prepares context and handoff for the next run.\n   380→- `author` has a human approval gate, not an iterative review loop.\n   381→- `run_audit` is an on-demand standalone audit, not part of the main pipeline flow.\n   382→\n   383→---\n   384→\n   385→## Reviewer Mode Table\n   386→\n   387→The reviewer skill operates in different modes depending on the phase. **Mode is always explicit** -- the caller passes `--mode <mode>`. There is no auto-detection based on artifact availability.\n   388→\n   389→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n   390→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n   391→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts in `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Verdict: PASS/NEEDS FIXES/NEEDS REWORK/FAIL |\n   392→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   393→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec, accessibility guidelines | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Findings with severity (blocking/advisory) |\n   394→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan, approved spec, design artifact | 7 plan dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   395→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes (or committed with known base SHA) | 5 task-execution dims | Pass/fail per task, no score |\n   396→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   397→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   398→\n   399→If `--mode` is not provided, the reviewer asks the user which review to run. Auto-detection based on artifact availability is NOT used -- it causes ambiguity in resumed/multi-phase runs where stale artifacts from prior phases exist.\n   400→\n   401→Each caller is responsible for passing the correct mode:\n   402→\n   403→- Clarifier passes `--mode clarification-review` after Phase 1A\n   404→- Discover workflow passes `--mode research-review` after research\n   405→- Specifier flow passes `--mode spec-challenge` after specify\n   406→- Brainstorming passes `--mode design-review` after user approval\n   407→- Writing-plans passes `--mode plan-review` after planning\n   408→- Executor passes `--mode task-review` for each task\n   409→- `/wazir` runner passes `--mode final` for the final review gate\n   410→\n   411→---\n   412→\n   413→## Codex Prompt Templates\n   414→\n   415→All Codex invocations read the model from config with a fallback:\n   416→\n   417→```bash\n   418→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   419→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   420→```\n   421→\n   422→### Artifact Review (specs, plans, designs via stdin)\n   423→\n   424→Use this template with `codex exec` for non-code artifacts piped via stdin:\n   425→\n   426→```bash\n   427→cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \\\n   428→  \"You are reviewing a [ARTIFACT_TYPE] for the Wazir engineering OS.\n   429→Focus on [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   430→Rules: cite specific sections, be actionable, say CLEAN if no issues.\n   431→Do NOT load or invoke any skills. Do NOT read the codebase.\n   432→Review ONLY the content provided via stdin.\"\n   433→```\n   434→\n   435→Replace `[ARTIFACT_TYPE]` with: `specification`, `implementation plan`, `design document`, `research brief`, or `clarification`.\n   436→Replace `[DIMENSION]` and `[dimension description]` with the current review pass dimension from the relevant dimension set above.\n   437→\n   438→### Code Review (diffs via --uncommitted or --base)\n   439→\n   440→Use this template with `codex review` for code changes:\n   441→\n   442→```bash\n   443→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   444→  \"Review the code changes for [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   445→Check against acceptance criteria: [criteria].\n   446→Flag: correctness issues, missing tests, unwired paths, drift from spec.\n   447→Do NOT load or invoke any skills.\"\n   448→```\n   449→\n   450→For committed changes, replace `--uncommitted` with `--base <sha>`.\n   451→Replace `[DIMENSION]`, `[dimension description]`, and `[criteria]` with the task-specific values from the execution plan and spec.\n   452→\n   453→---\n   454→\n   455→## Codex Output Context Protection\n   456→\n   457→Codex CLI output includes internal traces (file reads, tool calls, reasoning) that are NOT useful for the review — only the final findings matter. To prevent context flooding:\n   458→\n   459→### Tee + Extract Pattern\n   460→\n   461→1. **Always tee** Codex output to a file:\n   462→   ```bash\n   463→   codex exec ... 2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   464→   ```\n   465→\n   466→2. **Extract findings** after the last `codex` marker using `execute_file`:\n   467→   ```bash\n   468→   # If context-mode available (has_execute_file: true):\n   469→   mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute_file(\n   470→     path: \".wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\",\n   471→     language: \"shell\",\n   472→     code: \"tac $FILE | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\"\n   473→   )\n   474→   ```\n   475→\n   476→3. **Present extracted findings only** — the raw trace stays in the file for debugging but never enters the main context window.\n   477→\n   478→### Fallback (no context-mode)\n   479→\n   480→If `context_mode.has_execute_file` is false, extract using shell directly:\n   481→\n   482→```bash\n   483→tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→This reverses the file, finds the first (= last original) `codex` marker, reverses back, and skips the marker line.\n   487→\n   488→**If no marker found:** fail closed\n   489→\n   490→---\n   491→\n   492→## Phase Scoring: First vs Final Artifact Comparison\n   493→\n   494→At the start of each review loop (pass 1), score the artifact on its phase's canonical dimension set (1-10 per dimension). At the end of the loop (final pass), score again using the **same canonical dimensions**. Present the delta in the end-of-phase report.\n   495→\n   496→### Canonical Dimension Sets Per Phase\n   497→\n   498→These are the fixed rubrics — no ad-hoc dimension selection:\n   499→\n   500→| Phase | Canonical Dimensions |\n   501→|-------|---------------------|\n   502→| research-review | Coverage, Source quality, Relevance, Gaps identified, Actionability |\n   503→| clarification-review / spec-challenge | Completeness, Testability, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Scope creep |\n   504→| design-review | Spec coverage, Design-spec consistency, Accessibility, Visual consistency, Exported-code fidelity |\n   505→| plan-review | Completeness, Testability, Task granularity, Dependency correctness, Phase structure, File coverage, Estimation accuracy, Input coverage |\n   506→| task-review | Correctness, Tests, Wiring, Drift, Quality |\n   507→| final | Correctness, Completeness, Wiring, Verification, Drift, Quality, Documentation, Intent Alignment, Scope Coverage |\n   508→\n   509→### Scoring Rules\n   510→\n   511→1. Initial and final scores MUST use the **same dimension set** — the delta is only meaningful on the same rubric.\n   512→2. The reviewer records which dimension set was used in each pass file.\n   513→3. Delta format: `Dimension: X/10 → Y/10 (+Z)`.\n   514→\n   515→### Quality Delta Report Section\n   516→\n   517→The end-of-phase report (see \"End-of-Phase Report\" below) includes a **Quality Delta** section:\n   518→\n   519→```markdown\n   520→## Quality Delta\n   521→\n   522→| Dimension | Initial | Final | Delta |\n   523→|-----------|---------|-------|-------|\n   524→| Completeness | 4/10 | 9/10 | +5 |\n   525→| Testability | 3/10 | 8/10 | +5 |\n   526→| Ambiguity | 5/10 | 9/10 | +4 |\n   527→```\n   528→\n   529→---\n   530→\n   531→## End-of-Phase Report\n   532→\n   533→Every phase exit produces a report saved to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-report.md` containing:\n   534→\n   535→1. **Summary** — what the phase produced\n   536→2. **Key Changes** — first-version vs final-version highlights (not full diff — what improved)\n   537→3. **Quality Delta** — per-dimension before/after scores (see Phase Scoring above)\n   538→4. **Findings Log** — per-pass finding counts by severity (e.g., \"Pass 1: 6 findings (3 blocking, 2 warning, 1 note). Pass 7: 0 findings. All resolved.\")\n   539→5. **Usage** — token usage from `wazir capture usage` (runs before report generation)\n   540→6. **Context Savings** — context-mode stats if available, omit section if not\n   541→7. **Time Spent** — wall-clock elapsed time from phase start to end — log \"codex marker not found in output, cannot extract findings\" and present a warning to the user with 0 findings extracted. The raw file is preserved for manual review. Do NOT fall back to `tail` or any best-effort extraction that could leak traces into context.\n   542→"}]},"uuid":"8d5f9fd2-ba52-44d1-94a9-44252739fc4a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:13.186Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ee854436-0bf5-4c3b-80cb-1d8364b83f6e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8d5f9fd2-ba52-44d1-94a9-44252739fc4a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01F82257GZYdwpAogKy5mVys","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me read the prompt templates and expertise composition system."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":23738,"cache_read_input_tokens":11903,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":23738,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERL937sgW188CodBTE9","type":"assistant","uuid":"5a6cbed5-2f0a-430f-bc47-c7557fc1561b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:31.688Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5a6cbed5-2f0a-430f-bc47-c7557fc1561b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01F82257GZYdwpAogKy5mVys","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_0199cX4u3sgHp5GJPEdqvDrG","name":"Glob","input":{"pattern":"skills/subagent-driven-development/*.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":23738,"cache_read_input_tokens":11903,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":23738,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERL937sgW188CodBTE9","type":"assistant","uuid":"a237fd7f-b56a-459f-b4a0-3ce0e03b86cc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:32.608Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a237fd7f-b56a-459f-b4a0-3ce0e03b86cc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Glob","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_0199cX4u3sgHp5GJPEdqvDrG","toolUseID":"toolu_0199cX4u3sgHp5GJPEdqvDrG","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:32.717Z","uuid":"1c42195b-0b29-440f-886c-45ec139cb1b0","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a237fd7f-b56a-459f-b4a0-3ce0e03b86cc","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_0199cX4u3sgHp5GJPEdqvDrG","type":"tool_result","content":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/implementer-prompt.md\n/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md"}]},"uuid":"d84f6c1b-f885-4536-8179-290cc81d6b0b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:32.717Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a237fd7f-b56a-459f-b4a0-3ce0e03b86cc","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d84f6c1b-f885-4536-8179-290cc81d6b0b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01F82257GZYdwpAogKy5mVys","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/composition-map.yaml"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":23738,"cache_read_input_tokens":11903,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":23738,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERL937sgW188CodBTE9","type":"assistant","uuid":"665a01d3-9758-471a-8193-26f236b5a463","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:33.561Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"665a01d3-9758-471a-8193-26f236b5a463","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","uuid":"c3795335-b7bc-48e2-bef2-9ba3b77b7149","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:33.563Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c3795335-b7bc-48e2-bef2-9ba3b77b7149","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01F82257GZYdwpAogKy5mVys","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"expertise.*module|composition.map|expertise.*load","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":23738,"cache_read_input_tokens":11903,"output_tokens":205,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":23738},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERL937sgW188CodBTE9","type":"assistant","uuid":"0312ffda-b7c6-45fa-8a48-5557840dff63","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:34.485Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0312ffda-b7c6-45fa-8a48-5557840dff63","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","uuid":"b992f31f-f0c5-4f56-8986-17a66e299b73","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:34.487Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b992f31f-f0c5-4f56-8986-17a66e299b73","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","toolUseID":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:34.584Z","uuid":"66b22ff8-f7ed-4ded-9c6c-ba33a22b1e01","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0312ffda-b7c6-45fa-8a48-5557840dff63","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01TW5N96Twx73uaKoqEUb8bP","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 52 files\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/init/auto-detect.test.js\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\npackage.json\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/launch-checklist.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\ndocs/concepts/why-wazir.md\ndocs/readmes/features/expertise/README.md\ndocs/readmes/INDEX.md\nREADME.md\n.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json\n.cursor-plugin/plugin.json\n.claude-plugin/marketplace.json\n.claude-plugin/plugin.json\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ntooling/test/validate.test.js\ntooling/src/adapters/composition-engine.js\nskills/run-audit/SKILL.md\nskills/humanize/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/adapters/composition-engine.test.js\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-enhancement-decisions.md\nllms.txt\ntooling/test/role-contracts.test.js\nAGENTS.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/run-audit.md\ndocs/readmes/features/skills/self-audit.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/run-audit.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/learn.md\ndocs/reference/expertise-index.md\ndocs/concepts/composition-engine.md\ndocs/getting-started/02-first-run.md\ndocs/README.md\ndocs/plans/2026-03-15-docs-enforcement-plan.md\nexpertise/composition-map.yaml\nexpertise/humanize/domain-rules-content.md\ntemplates/task-definition-schema.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/architecture/decisions/technology-selection.md\nexpertise/architecture/integration/api-design-grpc.md\nexpertise/architecture/patterns/monolith.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/user-research.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/content-consumption.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/e-commerce.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/gamification.md\nexpertise/design/psychology/cognitive-load.md\nexpertise/i18n/PROGRESS.md\nexpertise/performance/backend/rate-limiting-and-throttling.md\nexpertise/performance/web/bundle-optimization.md\nexpertise/README.md\nexpertise/security/data/data-privacy-gdpr.md"}]},"uuid":"44aa25bf-7681-4b85-9741-786fd07208b9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:34.583Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"0312ffda-b7c6-45fa-8a48-5557840dff63","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"44aa25bf-7681-4b85-9741-786fd07208b9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","toolUseID":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.878Z","uuid":"334443c1-d04b-4b91-a1d2-5c64d9853a18","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"665a01d3-9758-471a-8193-26f236b5a463","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01TMdgn9PJtxbetzoKNkWdEj","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# expertise/composition-map.yaml\n     2→# Single source of truth for module resolution per role per task\n     3→#\n     4→# Layers:\n     5→#   1. always  — baked into every agent invocation for that role\n     6→#   2. auto    — auto-composed from stack detection (applied to all stacks)\n     7→#   3. stacks  — per-stack modules resolved from detected project stacks\n     8→#   4. concerns — task-specific modules from declared concerns\n     9→#\n    10→# Role rules:\n    11→#   executor      → expertise modules (HOW to build) + antipatterns (what NOT to do)\n    12→#   designer      → design tooling modules (HOW to design) + design antipatterns\n    13→#   verifier      → antipatterns ONLY (what to detect) + testing modules\n    14→#   reviewer      → antipatterns ONLY (what to detect) + architecture + design (during spec-challenge)\n    15→#   content-author -> content foundations + i18n + editorial constraints\n    16→#\n    17→# All paths are relative to expertise/\n    18→\n    19→always:\n    20→  executor:\n    21→    - antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\n    22→    - antipatterns/code/error-handling-antipatterns.md\n    23→    - antipatterns/code/naming-and-abstraction.md\n    24→  verifier:\n    25→    - antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\n    26→    - antipatterns/code/testing-antipatterns.md\n    27→    - antipatterns/code/state-management-antipatterns.md\n    28→    - quality/evidence-based-verification.md\n    29→  reviewer:\n    30→    - antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\n    31→    - antipatterns/code/code-smells.md\n    32→    - antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\n    33→    - antipatterns/code/dependency-antipatterns.md\n    34→    - architecture/foundations/architectural-thinking.md\n    35→    - architecture/foundations/coupling-and-cohesion.md\n    36→    - antipatterns/code/architecture-antipatterns.md\n    37→    - architecture/foundations/domain-driven-design.md\n    38→  content-author:\n    39→    - i18n/content/translation-management.md\n    40→    - i18n/foundations/string-externalization.md\n    41→    - i18n/foundations/pluralization-and-gender.md\n    42→\n    43→auto:\n    44→  all-stacks:\n    45→    all-roles:\n    46→      - antipatterns/security/vulnerability-patterns.md\n    47→      - antipatterns/security/secrets-antipatterns.md\n    48→      - antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md\n    49→      - antipatterns/process/technical-debt-antipatterns.md\n    50→\n    51→stacks:\n    52→  flutter:\n    53→    executor: [frontend/flutter.md, performance/platform-specific/flutter-performance.md]\n    54→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/flutter-antipatterns.md]\n    55→  react-native:\n    56→    executor: [frontend/react-native.md, architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md]\n    57→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md]\n    58→  node:\n    59→    executor: [backend/node-typescript.md, performance/platform-specific/node-performance.md]\n    60→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n    61→  react:\n    62→    executor: [frontend/react.md, performance/platform-specific/react-performance.md]\n    63→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/react-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/frontend/css-layout-antipatterns.md]\n    64→  vue:\n    65→    executor: [frontend/vue.md]\n    66→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/spa-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/frontend/css-layout-antipatterns.md]\n    67→  angular:\n    68→    executor: [frontend/angular.md]\n    69→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/spa-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/frontend/css-layout-antipatterns.md]\n    70→  native-android:\n    71→    executor: [frontend/native-android.md, architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md]\n    72→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md]\n    73→  native-ios:\n    74→    executor: [frontend/native-ios.md, architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md]\n    75→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md]\n    76→  python:\n    77→    executor: [backend/python-fastapi.md]\n    78→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n    79→  go:\n    80→    executor: [backend/go.md]\n    81→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n    82→  rust:\n    83→    executor: [backend/rust.md]\n    84→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n    85→  java:\n    86→    executor: [backend/java-spring.md]\n    87→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n    88→  postgres:\n    89→    executor: [infrastructure/database-postgres.md, performance/platform-specific/postgres-performance.md]\n    90→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md]\n    91→  mongodb:\n    92→    executor: [infrastructure/database-mongodb.md]\n    93→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md]\n    94→  electron:\n    95→    executor: [frontend/desktop-electron.md]\n    96→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/spa-antipatterns.md]\n    97→  next:\n    98→    executor: [frontend/react.md, performance/web/ssr-and-hydration.md]\n    99→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/frontend/react-antipatterns.md]\n   100→  fastapi:\n   101→    executor: [backend/python-fastapi.md, performance/backend/api-latency.md]\n   102→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n   103→  gcp:\n   104→    executor: [infrastructure/cloud-gcp.md]\n   105→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/process/deployment-antipatterns.md]\n   106→  aws:\n   107→    executor: [infrastructure/cloud-aws.md]\n   108→    antipatterns: [antipatterns/process/deployment-antipatterns.md]\n   109→  solidity:\n   110→    executor: [backend/solidity.md]\n   111→    antipatterns: [security/smart-contract-security.md]\n   112→  embedded:\n   113→    executor: [backend/embedded-firmware.md]\n   114→    antipatterns: []\n   115→\n   116→concerns:\n   117→  rtl:\n   118→    executor: [i18n/rtl/rtl-layout-mirroring.md, i18n/rtl/arabic-specific.md, i18n/rtl/rtl-forms-and-input.md]\n   119→    reviewer: [i18n/rtl/rtl-fundamentals.md, i18n/rtl/rtl-typography.md, i18n/foundations/text-direction-bidi.md]\n   120→    verifier: [i18n/rtl/rtl-testing-and-qa.md]\n   121→    content-author: [content/foundations/content-modeling.md, content/foundations/editorial-standards.md]\n   122→  rtl-advanced:\n   123→    executor: [i18n/rtl/rtl-navigation-and-gestures.md, i18n/rtl/rtl-icons-and-images.md, i18n/rtl/rtl-animations-and-transitions.md]\n   124→    reviewer: [i18n/rtl/hebrew-specific.md, i18n/advanced/bidirectional-text-algorithm.md]\n   125→    verifier: [i18n/rtl/rtl-testing-and-qa.md]\n   126→    content-author: [content/patterns/sample-content.md]\n   127→  i18n:\n   128→    executor: [i18n/foundations/i18n-architecture.md, i18n/foundations/string-externalization.md, i18n/foundations/pluralization-and-gender.md]\n   129→    reviewer: [i18n/foundations/i18n-architecture.md, i18n/foundations/date-time-calendars.md, i18n/foundations/numbers-currency-units.md]\n   130→    verifier: [i18n/advanced/testing-i18n.md]\n   131→    content-author: [content/foundations/content-modeling.md, content/foundations/editorial-standards.md]\n   132→  i18n-content:\n   133→    executor: [i18n/content/translation-management.md, i18n/content/locale-specific-formatting.md, i18n/content/content-adaptation.md]\n   134→    reviewer: [i18n/foundations/locale-and-language-tags.md, i18n/foundations/unicode-and-encoding.md]\n   135→    verifier: [i18n/advanced/testing-i18n.md]\n   136→    content-author: [content/foundations/terminology-governance.md, content/patterns/sample-content.md]\n   137→  i18n-platform:\n   138→    executor: [i18n/platform/react-i18n.md, i18n/platform/flutter-i18n.md, i18n/platform/backend-i18n.md]\n   139→    reviewer: [i18n/platform/web-css-i18n.md, i18n/platform/native-android-i18n.md, i18n/platform/native-ios-i18n.md]\n   140→    verifier: [i18n/advanced/performance-and-i18n.md, i18n/advanced/accessibility-and-i18n.md]\n   141→  i18n-scripts:\n   142→    executor: [i18n/advanced/complex-scripts.md, i18n/advanced/bidirectional-text-algorithm.md]\n   143→    reviewer: [i18n/foundations/unicode-and-encoding.md]\n   144→    verifier: [i18n/advanced/testing-i18n.md]\n   145→  i18n-translation:\n   146→    executor: [i18n/content/machine-translation-integration.md, i18n/content/translation-management.md]\n   147→    reviewer: [i18n/content/content-adaptation.md]\n   148→    verifier: [i18n/advanced/testing-i18n.md]\n   149→    content-author: [content/foundations/content-modeling.md]\n   150→  security-auth:\n   151→    executor: [security/foundations/authentication.md, security/foundations/authorization.md]\n   152→    reviewer: [security/foundations/owasp-top-10.md, security/foundations/secure-sdlc.md]\n   153→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/auth-antipatterns.md]\n   154→  security-data:\n   155→    executor: [security/data/data-encryption.md, security/data/pii-handling.md, security/data/database-security.md]\n   156→    reviewer: [security/data/data-privacy-gdpr.md, security/foundations/cryptography.md]\n   157→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/secrets-antipatterns.md]\n   158→  security-testing:\n   159→    executor: [security/testing/security-code-review.md, security/testing/vulnerability-scanning.md]\n   160→    reviewer: [security/testing/threat-modeling.md]\n   161→    verifier: [security/testing/penetration-testing.md]\n   162→  security-infra:\n   163→    executor: [security/infrastructure/network-security.md, security/infrastructure/logging-and-monitoring.md]\n   164→    reviewer: [security/infrastructure/cloud-security-aws.md, security/infrastructure/cloud-security-gcp.md]\n   165→    verifier: [security/infrastructure/incident-response.md, antipatterns/security/security-theater.md]\n   166→  security-supply-chain:\n   167→    executor: [security/foundations/supply-chain-security.md, security/foundations/secrets-management.md]\n   168→    reviewer: [security/foundations/secure-sdlc.md]\n   169→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/security-theater.md]\n   170→  performance:\n   171→    executor: [performance/foundations/caching-strategies.md, performance/foundations/algorithmic-complexity.md]\n   172→    reviewer: [performance/foundations/performance-budgets.md, performance/foundations/measuring-and-profiling.md]\n   173→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md]\n   174→  backend-performance:\n   175→    executor: [performance/backend/database-query-optimization.md, performance/backend/connection-pooling.md, performance/backend/background-jobs.md]\n   176→    reviewer: [performance/backend/rate-limiting-and-throttling.md, performance/backend/api-latency.md]\n   177→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/scaling-antipatterns.md]\n   178→  mobile-performance:\n   179→    executor: [performance/mobile/mobile-startup-time.md, performance/mobile/mobile-rendering.md, performance/mobile/mobile-memory-battery.md]\n   180→    reviewer: [performance/mobile/mobile-network.md]\n   181→    verifier: [performance/mobile/mobile-animations.md]\n   182→  infra-performance:\n   183→    executor: [performance/infrastructure/load-balancing.md, performance/infrastructure/cdn-and-edge.md]\n   184→    reviewer: [performance/infrastructure/auto-scaling.md]\n   185→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/scaling-antipatterns.md]\n   186→  observability:\n   187→    executor: [performance/infrastructure/observability.md, security/infrastructure/logging-and-monitoring.md]\n   188→    reviewer: [performance/foundations/measuring-and-profiling.md]\n   189→    verifier: [security/infrastructure/incident-response.md]\n   190→  async:\n   191→    executor: [performance/foundations/concurrency-and-parallelism.md, architecture/patterns/event-driven.md]\n   192→    reviewer: [architecture/patterns/event-driven.md, architecture/distributed/saga-pattern.md]\n   193→    verifier: [antipatterns/code/async-antipatterns.md]\n   194→  testing-strategy:\n   195→    executor: [quality/testing-web.md, quality/testing-api.md]\n   196→    reviewer: [quality/performance.md]\n   197→    verifier: [quality/testing-mobile.md, antipatterns/code/testing-antipatterns.md]\n   198→  accessibility:\n   199→    executor: [quality/accessibility.md]\n   200→    reviewer: [design/foundations/accessibility-design.md, i18n/advanced/accessibility-and-i18n.md]\n   201→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/accessibility-antipatterns.md]\n   202→    content-author: [content/patterns/accessibility-copy.md]\n   203→  realtime:\n   204→    executor: [architecture/integration/websockets-realtime.md]\n   205→    reviewer: [architecture/integration/websockets-realtime.md]\n   206→    verifier: []\n   207→    content-author: [content/patterns/notification-content.md]\n   208→  offline:\n   209→    executor: [architecture/mobile-architecture/offline-first.md, architecture/mobile-architecture/push-and-sync.md]\n   210→    reviewer: [architecture/mobile-architecture/offline-first.md]\n   211→    verifier: []\n   212→    content-author: [content/patterns/state-copy.md]\n   213→  microservices:\n   214→    executor: [architecture/patterns/microservices.md, architecture/distributed/saga-pattern.md]\n   215→    reviewer: [architecture/patterns/microservices.md, architecture/patterns/modular-monolith.md]\n   216→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/microservices-antipatterns.md]\n   217→  gamification:\n   218→    executor: [design/patterns/gamification.md]\n   219→    reviewer: [design/patterns/gamification.md, design/psychology/persuasive-design.md]\n   220→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md]\n   221→  api-design:\n   222→    executor: [architecture/integration/api-design-rest.md, architecture/integration/api-design-graphql.md, security/web/api-security.md]\n   223→    reviewer: [architecture/integration/api-design-rest.md, architecture/integration/api-design-grpc.md]\n   224→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n   225→  distributed:\n   226→    executor: [architecture/distributed/distributed-systems-fundamentals.md, architecture/distributed/circuit-breaker-bulkhead.md, architecture/distributed/idempotency-and-retry.md]\n   227→    reviewer: [architecture/distributed/cap-theorem-and-tradeoffs.md, architecture/distributed/consensus-and-coordination.md]\n   228→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/microservices-antipatterns.md]\n   229→  data-layer:\n   230→    executor: [architecture/data/data-modeling.md, architecture/data/caching-architecture.md, architecture/data/event-streams-and-queues.md]\n   231→    reviewer: [architecture/data/sql-vs-nosql.md, architecture/data/data-consistency.md]\n   232→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/caching-antipatterns.md]\n   233→  search:\n   234→    executor: [architecture/data/search-architecture.md]\n   235→    reviewer: [architecture/data/data-modeling.md]\n   236→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md]\n   237→  mobile-security:\n   238→    executor: [security/mobile/mobile-data-storage.md, security/mobile/mobile-network-security.md]\n   239→    reviewer: [security/mobile/mobile-binary-protection.md]\n   240→    verifier: [security/mobile/mobile-android-security.md, security/mobile/mobile-ios-security.md]\n   241→  web-security:\n   242→    executor: [security/web/xss.md, security/web/csrf.md, security/web/injection.md, security/web/session-management.md]\n   243→    reviewer: [security/foundations/owasp-top-10.md, security/web/cors-and-headers.md, security/web/file-upload.md]\n   244→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/vulnerability-patterns.md]\n   245→  design-system:\n   246→    executor: [design/disciplines/design-systems.md, design/foundations/color-theory.md, design/foundations/typography.md, design/foundations/spacing-and-layout.md]\n   247→    reviewer: [design/foundations/visual-hierarchy.md, design/foundations/accessibility-design.md]\n   248→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   249→  design-tooling:\n   250→    designer: [design/tooling/open-pencil.md]\n   251→    reviewer: [design/foundations/accessibility-design.md, design/foundations/visual-hierarchy.md]\n   252→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   253→    content-author: [content/patterns/state-copy.md, content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   254→  cloud-infra:\n   255→    executor: [infrastructure/cloud-aws.md, infrastructure/devops-cicd.md]\n   256→    reviewer: [security/infrastructure/container-security.md, infrastructure/cloud-gcp.md]\n   257→    verifier: [antipatterns/process/deployment-antipatterns.md]\n   258→  web-performance:\n   259→    executor: [performance/web/web-vitals.md, performance/web/bundle-optimization.md, performance/web/rendering-performance.md]\n   260→    reviewer: [performance/foundations/performance-budgets.md, performance/web/image-and-media.md]\n   261→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/performance/premature-optimization.md]\n   262→  event-driven:\n   263→    executor: [architecture/patterns/event-driven.md, architecture/patterns/cqrs-event-sourcing.md]\n   264→    reviewer: [architecture/data/event-streams-and-queues.md]\n   265→    verifier: [antipatterns/code/async-antipatterns.md]\n   266→  cqrs:\n   267→    executor: [architecture/patterns/cqrs-event-sourcing.md]\n   268→    reviewer: [architecture/data/data-consistency.md]\n   269→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md]\n   270→  architecture-decisions:\n   271→    executor: [architecture/decisions/architecture-decision-records.md, architecture/decisions/technology-selection.md]\n   272→    reviewer: [architecture/decisions/build-vs-buy.md, architecture/decisions/monolith-to-microservices.md]\n   273→    verifier: []\n   274→  architecture-patterns:\n   275→    executor: [architecture/patterns/hexagonal-clean-architecture.md, architecture/patterns/layered-architecture.md, architecture/foundations/design-principles-solid.md, architecture/foundations/separation-of-concerns.md]\n   276→    reviewer: [architecture/patterns/monolith.md, architecture/patterns/plugin-architecture.md]\n   277→    verifier: [antipatterns/code/architecture-antipatterns.md]\n   278→  serverless:\n   279→    executor: [architecture/patterns/serverless.md]\n   280→    reviewer: [architecture/patterns/serverless.md, architecture/scaling/stateless-design.md]\n   281→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/scaling-antipatterns.md]\n   282→  scaling:\n   283→    executor: [architecture/scaling/horizontal-vs-vertical.md, architecture/scaling/stateless-design.md, architecture/scaling/database-scaling.md]\n   284→    reviewer: [architecture/scaling/multi-tenancy.md]\n   285→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/scaling-antipatterns.md]\n   286→  feature-flags:\n   287→    executor: [architecture/scaling/feature-flags-and-rollouts.md]\n   288→    reviewer: [architecture/scaling/feature-flags-and-rollouts.md]\n   289→    verifier: [antipatterns/process/deployment-antipatterns.md]\n   290→  multi-tenancy:\n   291→    executor: [architecture/scaling/multi-tenancy.md]\n   292→    reviewer: [architecture/scaling/multi-tenancy.md, architecture/data/data-consistency.md]\n   293→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/vulnerability-patterns.md]\n   294→  third-party-integration:\n   295→    executor: [architecture/integration/third-party-integration.md, architecture/integration/webhooks-and-callbacks.md]\n   296→    reviewer: [architecture/integration/api-design-rest.md]\n   297→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/api-design-antipatterns.md]\n   298→  mobile-arch:\n   299→    executor: [architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md, architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-backend-for-frontend.md]\n   300→    reviewer: [architecture/mobile-architecture/push-and-sync.md]\n   301→    verifier: [antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md]\n   302→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   303→  twelve-factor:\n   304→    executor: [architecture/foundations/twelve-factor-app.md]\n   305→    reviewer: [architecture/foundations/twelve-factor-app.md, architecture/scaling/stateless-design.md]\n   306→    verifier: []\n   307→  responsive:\n   308→    executor: [design/disciplines/responsive-design.md, design/platforms/web-responsive.md]\n   309→    reviewer: [design/platforms/tablet.md]\n   310→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   311→  dark-mode:\n   312→    executor: [design/disciplines/dark-mode-theming.md]\n   313→    reviewer: [design/foundations/color-theory.md]\n   314→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   315→  onboarding-ux:\n   316→    executor: [design/patterns/onboarding.md, design/patterns/feedback-and-states.md]\n   317→    reviewer: [design/psychology/cognitive-load.md, design/psychology/user-mental-models.md]\n   318→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   319→    content-author: [content/patterns/state-copy.md, content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   320→  forms-ux:\n   321→    executor: [design/patterns/forms-and-input.md, design/patterns/feedback-and-states.md]\n   322→    reviewer: [design/psychology/error-psychology.md]\n   323→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   324→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md, content/patterns/state-copy.md]\n   325→  navigation-ux:\n   326→    executor: [design/patterns/navigation.md, design/patterns/search-and-filter.md]\n   327→    reviewer: [design/disciplines/information-architecture.md]\n   328→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   329→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   330→  notifications-ux:\n   331→    executor: [design/patterns/notifications.md, design/patterns/settings-and-preferences.md]\n   332→    reviewer: [design/psychology/cognitive-load.md]\n   333→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md]\n   334→    content-author: [content/patterns/notification-content.md]\n   335→  e-commerce:\n   336→    executor: [design/patterns/e-commerce.md, design/patterns/authentication-flows.md]\n   337→    reviewer: [design/psychology/persuasive-design.md, design/patterns/forms-and-input.md]\n   338→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md, antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   339→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md, content/patterns/sample-content.md, content/foundations/terminology-governance.md]\n   340→  social:\n   341→    executor: [design/patterns/social-and-community.md, design/patterns/content-consumption.md]\n   342→    reviewer: [design/psychology/persuasive-design.md]\n   343→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md]\n   344→    content-author: [content/patterns/notification-content.md]\n   345→  data-display:\n   346→    executor: [design/patterns/data-display.md]\n   347→    reviewer: [design/foundations/visual-hierarchy.md]\n   348→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   349→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md, content/patterns/state-copy.md]\n   350→  interaction-design:\n   351→    executor: [design/disciplines/interaction-design.md, design/foundations/motion-and-animation.md]\n   352→    reviewer: [design/foundations/iconography.md, design/psychology/cognitive-load.md]\n   353→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   354→  user-research:\n   355→    executor: [design/disciplines/user-research.md, design/disciplines/usability-testing.md]\n   356→    reviewer: [design/psychology/user-mental-models.md, design/psychology/error-psychology.md]\n   357→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   358→  platform-mobile:\n   359→    executor: [design/platforms/mobile-cross-platform.md]\n   360→    reviewer: [design/platforms/mobile-android.md, design/platforms/mobile-ios.md]\n   361→    verifier: [antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md]\n   362→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   363→  platform-desktop:\n   364→    executor: [design/platforms/desktop-native.md]\n   365→    reviewer: [design/platforms/desktop-native.md]\n   366→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   367→  platform-web:\n   368→    executor: [design/platforms/web-dashboard.md, design/platforms/web-responsive.md]\n   369→    reviewer: [design/disciplines/responsive-design.md]\n   370→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md]\n   371→    content-author: [content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   372→  auth-flows:\n   373→    executor: [design/patterns/authentication-flows.md, security/foundations/authentication.md]\n   374→    reviewer: [security/foundations/authorization.md]\n   375→    verifier: [antipatterns/backend/auth-antipatterns.md]\n   376→    content-author: [content/patterns/state-copy.md, content/foundations/microcopy.md]\n   377→  memory-management:\n   378→    executor: [performance/foundations/memory-management.md, performance/foundations/concurrency-and-parallelism.md]\n   379→    reviewer: [performance/foundations/algorithmic-complexity.md]\n   380→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md]\n   381→  network-optimization:\n   382→    executor: [performance/web/network-optimization.md, performance/web/image-and-media.md]\n   383→    reviewer: [performance/infrastructure/cdn-and-edge.md]\n   384→    verifier: [antipatterns/performance/premature-optimization.md]\n   385→  cybersecurity:\n   386→    executor: [infrastructure/cybersecurity.md, security/infrastructure/network-security.md]\n   387→    reviewer: [security/foundations/secure-sdlc.md]\n   388→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/security-theater.md]\n   389→  rtl-design:\n   390→    executor: [design/foundations/rtl-design.md]\n   391→    reviewer: [i18n/rtl/rtl-fundamentals.md]\n   392→    verifier: [i18n/rtl/rtl-testing-and-qa.md]\n   393→\n   394→  # New concerns from expertise expansion (2026-03-12)\n   395→  compliance:\n   396→    executor: [security/compliance-frameworks.md]\n   397→    reviewer: [security/compliance-frameworks.md, security/data/data-privacy-gdpr.md]\n   398→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/security-theater.md]\n   399→  ml-model-qa:\n   400→    executor: [quality/ml-model-audit.md]\n   401→    reviewer: [quality/ml-model-audit.md]\n   402→    verifier: [quality/ml-model-audit.md]\n   403→  agentic-identity:\n   404→    executor: [security/agentic-identity.md]\n   405→    reviewer: [security/agentic-identity.md]\n   406→    verifier: [antipatterns/security/vulnerability-patterns.md]\n   407→  evidence-verification:\n   408→    verifier: [quality/evidence-based-verification.md]\n   409→    reviewer: [quality/evidence-based-verification.md]\n   410→  microinteractions:\n   411→    executor: [design/patterns/microinteractions.md]\n   412→    reviewer: [design/psychology/cognitive-load.md]\n   413→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/ux-antipatterns.md]\n   414→  behavioral-ux:\n   415→    executor: [design/psychology/behavioral-nudges.md]\n   416→    reviewer: [design/psychology/cognitive-load.md, design/psychology/persuasive-design.md]\n   417→    verifier: [antipatterns/design/dark-patterns.md]\n   418→\n   419→  # Humanize concern: AI text pattern removal and writing quality (loaded for all text-producing roles)\n   420→  humanize:\n   421→    executor: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-code.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   422→    content-author: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-content.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   423→    specifier: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   424→    planner: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   425→    reviewer: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   426→    learner: [humanize/vocabulary-blacklist.md, humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md, humanize/self-audit-checklist.md]\n   427→\n   428→  # Audit-specific concerns (loaded by /run-audit skill, composed onto researcher role)\n   429→  audit-security:\n   430→    researcher: [security/foundations/owasp-top-10.md, security/foundations/supply-chain-security.md, security/foundations/secrets-management.md, security/web/xss.md, security/web/csrf.md, security/web/injection.md]\n   431→    reviewer: [security/foundations/secure-sdlc.md, security/foundations/cryptography.md]\n   432→  audit-code-quality:\n   433→    researcher: [antipatterns/code/code-smells.md, antipatterns/code/naming-and-abstraction.md, antipatterns/code/error-handling-antipatterns.md, antipatterns/code/testing-antipatterns.md]\n   434→    reviewer: [antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md]\n   435→  audit-architecture:\n   436→    researcher: [architecture/foundations/architectural-thinking.md, architecture/foundations/coupling-and-cohesion.md, architecture/foundations/design-principles-solid.md, architecture/foundations/separation-of-concerns.md, antipatterns/code/architecture-antipatterns.md]\n   437→    reviewer: [architecture/patterns/hexagonal-clean-architecture.md]\n   438→  audit-performance:\n   439→    researcher: [performance/foundations/caching-strategies.md, performance/foundations/algorithmic-complexity.md, performance/foundations/memory-management.md, antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md]\n   440→    reviewer: [performance/foundations/performance-budgets.md]\n   441→  audit-dependencies:\n   442→    researcher: [antipatterns/code/dependency-antipatterns.md, security/foundations/supply-chain-security.md, antipatterns/process/technical-debt-antipatterns.md]\n   443→    reviewer: [security/foundations/secure-sdlc.md]\n   444→"}]},"uuid":"189007d1-2633-440e-aa90-75509f540c44","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:57.878Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"665a01d3-9758-471a-8193-26f236b5a463","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"189007d1-2633-440e-aa90-75509f540c44","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01PaES2HworkpvVj5mvFimtS","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me read the two review subagent prompt templates and the code review antipatterns expertise module."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":10639,"cache_read_input_tokens":35641,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":10639,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQwfeKs8gSJdjnfZEG","type":"assistant","uuid":"ec1fbb0f-fd82-4897-9f6d-85adc9c328a4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:35.221Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ec1fbb0f-fd82-4897-9f6d-85adc9c328a4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01PaES2HworkpvVj5mvFimtS","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":10639,"cache_read_input_tokens":35641,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":10639,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQwfeKs8gSJdjnfZEG","type":"assistant","uuid":"9e924e93-5dfa-4fbd-83c2-b88017030372","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.085Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9e924e93-5dfa-4fbd-83c2-b88017030372","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","uuid":"6a8a23ca-7fce-4d19-9ea1-5d69aff8cbd0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.086Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6a8a23ca-7fce-4d19-9ea1-5d69aff8cbd0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","toolUseID":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.150Z","uuid":"122929d5-6540-401a-89a6-618cab76294e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9e924e93-5dfa-4fbd-83c2-b88017030372","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01E2bgMHcPZ5PTBE7nwG6cmn","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template\n     2→\n     3→Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.\n     4→\n     5→**Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)\n     6→\n     7→```\n     8→Task tool (general-purpose):\n     9→  description: \"Review spec compliance for Task N\"\n    10→  prompt: |\n    11→    You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.\n    12→\n    13→    ## What Was Requested\n    14→\n    15→    [FULL TEXT of task requirements]\n    16→\n    17→    ## What Implementer Claims They Built\n    18→\n    19→    [From implementer's report]\n    20→\n    21→    ## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report\n    22→\n    23→    The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,\n    24→    inaccurate, or optimistic. You MUST verify everything independently.\n    25→\n    26→    **DO NOT:**\n    27→    - Take their word for what they implemented\n    28→    - Trust their claims about completeness\n    29→    - Accept their interpretation of requirements\n    30→\n    31→    **DO:**\n    32→    - Read the actual code they wrote\n    33→    - Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line\n    34→    - Check for missing pieces they claimed to implement\n    35→    - Look for extra features they didn't mention\n    36→\n    37→    ## Codebase Exploration\n    38→\n    39→    Use wazir index search-symbols before direct file reads.\n    40→    1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` to locate relevant code\n    41→    2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    42→    3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    43→\n    44→    ## Your Job\n    45→\n    46→    Read the implementation code and verify:\n    47→\n    48→    **Missing requirements:**\n    49→    - Did they implement everything that was requested?\n    50→    - Are there requirements they skipped or missed?\n    51→    - Did they claim something works but didn't actually implement it?\n    52→\n    53→    **Extra/unneeded work:**\n    54→    - Did they build things that weren't requested?\n    55→    - Did they over-engineer or add unnecessary features?\n    56→    - Did they add \"nice to haves\" that weren't in spec?\n    57→\n    58→    **Misunderstandings:**\n    59→    - Did they interpret requirements differently than intended?\n    60→    - Did they solve the wrong problem?\n    61→    - Did they implement the right feature but wrong way?\n    62→\n    63→    **Verify by reading code, not by trusting report.**\n    64→\n    65→    Report:\n    66→    - PASS: Spec compliant (if everything matches after code inspection)\n    67→    - FAIL: Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]\n    68→```\n    69→"}]},"uuid":"505a0d8f-c0c4-4483-b983-15b6e0469dc5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.150Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"9e924e93-5dfa-4fbd-83c2-b88017030372","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"505a0d8f-c0c4-4483-b983-15b6e0469dc5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01PaES2HworkpvVj5mvFimtS","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":10639,"cache_read_input_tokens":35641,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":10639,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQwfeKs8gSJdjnfZEG","type":"assistant","uuid":"73b977f7-c9e0-4cb7-8875-a8f27c092afe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.983Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"73b977f7-c9e0-4cb7-8875-a8f27c092afe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","uuid":"7a4ba21b-6458-45a1-935f-eb0e4cf1fabb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.985Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7a4ba21b-6458-45a1-935f-eb0e4cf1fabb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","toolUseID":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:37.073Z","uuid":"9a22db30-e374-4ebd-8d2d-b998067343a4","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"73b977f7-c9e0-4cb7-8875-a8f27c092afe","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01SuudeF2iSpZQnqnKv4Rg5x","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Code Quality Reviewer Prompt Template\n     2→\n     3→Use this template when dispatching a code quality reviewer subagent.\n     4→\n     5→**Purpose:** Verify implementation is well-built (clean, tested, maintainable)\n     6→\n     7→**Only dispatch after spec compliance review passes.**\n     8→\n     9→```\n    10→Task tool (wz:code-reviewer):\n    11→  Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md\n    12→\n    13→  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from implementer's report]\n    14→  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]\n    15→  BASE_SHA: [commit before task]\n    16→  HEAD_SHA: [current commit]\n    17→  DESCRIPTION: [task summary]\n    18→```\n    19→\n    20→**Codebase Exploration:** Use wazir index search-symbols before direct file reads. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` to locate relevant code, then use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads.\n    21→\n    22→**In addition to standard code quality concerns, the reviewer should check:**\n    23→- Does each file have one clear responsibility with a well-defined interface?\n    24→- Are units decomposed so they can be understood and tested independently?\n    25→- Is the implementation following the file structure from the plan?\n    26→- Did this implementation create new files that are already large, or significantly grow existing files? (Don't flag pre-existing file sizes — focus on what this change contributed.)\n    27→\n    28→**Code reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment\n    29→"}]},"uuid":"5fbb5a77-a057-4c85-ac3d-75e5cacc6c8e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:37.073Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"73b977f7-c9e0-4cb7-8875-a8f27c092afe","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5fbb5a77-a057-4c85-ac3d-75e5cacc6c8e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01PaES2HworkpvVj5mvFimtS","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Nawxbduhveziquhje3jGwJ","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":10639,"cache_read_input_tokens":35641,"output_tokens":254,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":10639},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQwfeKs8gSJdjnfZEG","type":"assistant","uuid":"c3c741ba-e863-4c44-9fb7-fb7d59dee9c8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:37.332Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c3c741ba-e863-4c44-9fb7-fb7d59dee9c8","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01Nawxbduhveziquhje3jGwJ","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Nawxbduhveziquhje3jGwJ","uuid":"cb2736f8-b70b-45fc-9181-3dd077c3b55b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:37.334Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c3c741ba-e863-4c44-9fb7-fb7d59dee9c8","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","content":"File content (14052 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","is_error":true,"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Nawxbduhveziquhje3jGwJ"}]},"uuid":"2d2e66df-d284-4073-916c-69ce801b74c1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:00.895Z","toolUseResult":"Error: File content (14052 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"c3c741ba-e863-4c44-9fb7-fb7d59dee9c8","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2d2e66df-d284-4073-916c-69ce801b74c1","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_018HAZ5bwRWZQepbsDapLJdB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me read the key sections of the code review antipatterns and also look at how Codex CLI skill works, plus the security sensitivity check."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1710,"cache_read_input_tokens":46280,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1710,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXAVyjcGJ2BH76uR5J","type":"assistant","uuid":"8f6cbab2-c583-401c-9010-40ab769da9d9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.373Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8f6cbab2-c583-401c-9010-40ab769da9d9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_018HAZ5bwRWZQepbsDapLJdB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md","limit":80},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1710,"cache_read_input_tokens":46280,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1710,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXAVyjcGJ2BH76uR5J","type":"assistant","uuid":"31e37092-7284-4cc3-8a1a-2bdd9c729067","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.241Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"31e37092-7284-4cc3-8a1a-2bdd9c729067","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","uuid":"8677f7f1-42c8-4f3f-b4b2-b44beb9424dd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.241Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8677f7f1-42c8-4f3f-b4b2-b44beb9424dd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","toolUseID":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.300Z","uuid":"8e6476af-d1ec-4c22-a071-dcf9d509fbd8","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"31e37092-7284-4cc3-8a1a-2bdd9c729067","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01SRPUL1PSFEdAnbhd1bbLfe","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Code Review Anti-Patterns\n     2→\n     3→> Code review is the single most impactful quality practice a team can adopt -- and the single most destructive when done poorly. These anti-patterns cover the ways reviews fail: through negligence, ego, process breakdown, or cultural dysfunction. Each pattern has been observed across organizations from two-person startups to Google-scale engineering teams. A dysfunctional review culture does not just miss bugs -- it erodes trust, demoralizes contributors, and quietly drives your best engineers out the door.\n     4→\n     5→> **Domain:** Process\n     6→> **Anti-patterns covered:** 20\n     7→> **Highest severity:** Critical\n     8→\n     9→## Anti-Patterns\n    10→\n    11→### AP-01: Rubber Stamping\n    12→\n    13→**Also known as:** LGTM-and-Move-On, Drive-Through Approval, Checkbox Review\n    14→**Frequency:** Very Common\n    15→**Severity:** Critical\n    16→**Detection difficulty:** Hard\n    17→\n    18→**What it looks like:**\n    19→\n    20→A PR is opened. Within 90 seconds, it has an approval with a one-word comment: \"LGTM.\" The reviewer did not check out the branch, did not run the code, and may not have scrolled past the first file. The approval exists solely to satisfy a branch protection rule. Chromium's core team sent an internal memo titled \"Please don't rubber stamp code reviews\" after noticing that approvals were arriving faster than a human could physically read the diff.\n    21→\n    22→**Why reviewers do it:**\n    23→\n    24→Review work is invisible -- there is no dashboard tracking how thoroughly someone reviewed. Teams under delivery pressure treat reviews as a gate to clear, not a quality practice. When a senior engineer submits a PR, juniors assume the code is correct and approve out of deference. A culture of reciprocal rubber stamping develops: \"I approve yours quickly, you approve mine quickly.\" Junior reviewers see that a senior reviewer has approved, so they rubber stamp too -- \"Well, I trust the senior reviewer!\"\n    25→\n    26→**What goes wrong:**\n    27→\n    28→Bugs that are visible in the diff -- copy-paste errors, missing null checks, hardcoded credentials -- ship to production because nobody actually read the code. A 2015 study by Czerwonka et al. at Microsoft found that reviews where the reviewer spent less than five minutes had a defect detection rate near zero. Rubber-stamped code at Knight Capital contributed to a $440 million loss in 45 minutes when untested deployment code went live. The review log creates a false audit trail suggesting diligence that never occurred. If you are in a culture where untested code gets waved through because someone powerful wanted it merged, you do not have a code review process -- you have theater.\n    29→\n    30→**The fix:**\n    31→\n    32→Require reviewers to leave at least one substantive comment (not \"LGTM\") before approving. Track review-to-approval time and flag approvals that arrive faster than 2 minutes per 100 lines changed. Rotate review assignments so that no single person is the default reviewer. Make review thoroughness a first-class performance metric alongside code output.\n    33→\n    34→**Detection rule:**\n    35→\n    36→Measure the median time between PR assignment and approval. If median approval time is under 3 minutes for PRs exceeding 100 lines, rubber stamping is systemic. Track the ratio of approvals with zero inline comments -- if it exceeds 40%, reviews are not substantive.\n    37→\n    38→---\n    39→\n    40→### AP-02: Nitpick Focus\n    41→\n    42→**Also known as:** Bikeshedding, Style Police, Missing the Forest for the Trees\n    43→**Frequency:** Very Common\n    44→**Severity:** High\n    45→**Detection difficulty:** Easy\n    46→\n    47→**What it looks like:**\n    48→\n    49→A PR introduces a new authentication flow with a subtle race condition in session handling. The review thread contains 14 comments, all about variable naming, brace placement, and whether to use single or double quotes. The race condition ships to production unnoticed. The reviewer spent 45 minutes on the review -- all of it on cosmetic concerns.\n    50→\n    51→**Why reviewers do it:**\n    52→\n    53→Style issues are easy to spot and unambiguous to comment on. Identifying logic errors, security flaws, or architectural problems requires deeper cognitive effort and domain knowledge. Commenting on style feels productive and demonstrates engagement without the vulnerability of being wrong about a substantive issue. Parkinson's Law of Triviality predicts exactly this: groups spend disproportionate time on trivial matters because everyone can have an opinion on them.\n    54→\n    55→**What goes wrong:**\n    56→\n    57→Substantive defects pass through while cosmetic ones are caught. Authors become frustrated because the feedback feels petty relative to the effort they invested. A study published at IEEE SANER 2021 on anti-patterns in modern code review found that superficial reviews focusing on style were strongly correlated with higher post-release defect density. Over time, developers learn that reviews are about style compliance, not quality, and they stop expecting reviews to catch real issues. The team develops a false sense of security: \"we do thorough code reviews\" -- but the reviews catch nothing that a linter could not.\n    58→\n    59→**The fix:**\n    60→\n    61→Automate all style enforcement with linters and formatters (Prettier, ESLint, Black, gofmt) in pre-commit hooks or CI. Establish a team agreement: if a linter can catch it, a human should not comment on it. Train reviewers to structure feedback in tiers: (1) blocking issues (bugs, security, correctness), (2) design concerns, (3) suggestions, (4) nitpicks -- and require at least one comment in tiers 1-2 before spending time on tier 4.\n    62→\n    63→**Detection rule:**\n    64→\n    65→Categorize review comments over a two-week period. If more than 60% of comments are style/formatting related and less than 10% address logic, design, or security, the team has a nitpick focus problem.\n    66→\n    67→---\n    68→\n    69→### AP-03: Too-Late Review\n    70→\n    71→**Also known as:** Post-Facto Review, Retroactive Approval, Ambush Review\n    72→**Frequency:** Common\n    73→**Severity:** Critical\n    74→**Detection difficulty:** Easy\n    75→\n    76→**What it looks like:**\n    77→\n    78→Code is merged to main before review is complete -- or the reviewer raises fundamental architectural objections after the author has invested days of implementation work. In the first case, the developer merges their own PR citing urgency, then asks someone to \"take a look when you get a chance.\" In the second, the reviewer says \"This should use event sourcing instead of CRUD\" after the author has already built the entire CRUD layer. Either way, the review's value is destroyed by timing.\n    79→\n    80→**Why reviewers do it:**"}]},"uuid":"c736748d-8676-49ed-8db3-3b3141b6311c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.300Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"31e37092-7284-4cc3-8a1a-2bdd9c729067","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c736748d-8676-49ed-8db3-3b3141b6311c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_018HAZ5bwRWZQepbsDapLJdB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/codex-cli/SKILL.md","limit":80},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1710,"cache_read_input_tokens":46280,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1710,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXAVyjcGJ2BH76uR5J","type":"assistant","uuid":"6c07066b-9ee8-415f-b1da-c9eccac8f484","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.691Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6c07066b-9ee8-415f-b1da-c9eccac8f484","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","parentToolUseID":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","uuid":"fb16c763-42bb-4e34-af41-85af0a7635eb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.691Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fb16c763-42bb-4e34-af41-85af0a7635eb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","toolUseID":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.745Z","uuid":"4cd66fef-1d75-4dbc-985b-8c48d0a874d3","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6c07066b-9ee8-415f-b1da-c9eccac8f484","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_018XsFx7tyCNDzp3xaS9o66V","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:codex-cli\n     3→description: How to use Codex CLI programmatically for reviews, execution, and sandbox operations within Wazir pipelines.\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Codex CLI Integration\n     7→\n     8→## Command Routing\n     9→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    10→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    11→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    12→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    13→\n    14→## Codebase Exploration\n    15→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    16→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    17→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    18→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    19→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    20→\n    21→Reference for using the OpenAI Codex CLI in Wazir pipelines. Codex is a terminal-based coding agent that reads your codebase, suggests or implements changes, and executes commands with OS-level sandboxing.\n    22→\n    23→## Commands\n    24→\n    25→### codex (interactive)\n    26→\n    27→Launch the interactive TUI. Default mode for ad-hoc work.\n    28→\n    29→```bash\n    30→codex \"Fix the failing test in src/auth.ts\"\n    31→```\n    32→\n    33→### codex exec\n    34→\n    35→Run Codex non-interactively (alias: `codex e`). Streams results to stdout or JSONL. This is the primary command for Wazir automation.\n    36→\n    37→```bash\n    38→# Basic non-interactive run\n    39→codex exec \"Refactor the auth module to use async/await\"\n    40→\n    41→# Pipe a long prompt from stdin\n    42→cat prompt.md | codex exec -\n    43→\n    44→# JSON event stream for programmatic consumption\n    45→codex exec --json \"Add error handling to all API routes\"\n    46→\n    47→# Write final assistant message to a file\n    48→codex exec --output-file result.md \"Summarize the codebase architecture\"\n    49→\n    50→# Enforce structured output with a JSON schema\n    51→codex exec --output-schema schema.json \"List all exported functions\"\n    52→\n    53→# Ephemeral run (no session files persisted)\n    54→codex exec --ephemeral \"Quick check: does this file import lodash?\"\n    55→```\n    56→\n    57→**Key flags:**\n    58→\n    59→| Flag | Description |\n    60→|------|-------------|\n    61→| `--model <MODEL>` | Override the configured model (e.g., `gpt-5.4`, `gpt-5.4-mini`) |\n    62→| `--json` | Emit newline-delimited JSON events (JSONL) instead of formatted text |\n    63→| `--output-file <PATH>` | Write the final assistant message to a file |\n    64→| `--output-schema <PATH>` | Enforce structured output conforming to a JSON schema |\n    65→| `--ephemeral` | Run without persisting session rollout files |\n    66→| `--full-auto` | Apply the low-friction automation preset (`workspace-write` sandbox + `on-request` approvals) |\n    67→| `--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox` / `--yolo` | Bypass all approval prompts and sandboxing (use only inside isolated runners) |\n    68→| `-c key=value` | Set a config override (e.g., `-c model=gpt-5.4`) |\n    69→\n    70→**JSONL event types:** `thread.started`, `turn.started`, `turn.completed`, `turn.failed`, `item.message`, `item.command`, `item.file_change`, `item.mcp_tool_call`.\n    71→\n    72→### codex review\n    73→\n    74→Dedicated code review command. This is what Wazir uses for secondary review in the reviewer skill.\n    75→\n    76→```bash\n    77→# Review uncommitted changes (staged + unstaged + untracked)\n    78→codex review --uncommitted\n    79→\n    80→# Review changes against a base branch"}]},"uuid":"749f7b46-4c28-43fe-b3c2-7d8b00d9c47a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:00.745Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6c07066b-9ee8-415f-b1da-c9eccac8f484","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"749f7b46-4c28-43fe-b3c2-7d8b00d9c47a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_018HAZ5bwRWZQepbsDapLJdB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js","limit":60},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1710,"cache_read_input_tokens":46280,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1710,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERXAVyjcGJ2BH76uR5J","type":"assistant","uuid":"9db2a108-e10f-444b-b061-53062d043c70","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:01.162Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9db2a108-e10f-444b-b061-53062d043c70","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","uuid":"b1ae4f67-0428-4c06-9383-f536c6ae140b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:01.162Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b1ae4f67-0428-4c06-9383-f536c6ae140b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","toolUseID":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:01.213Z","uuid":"65d90a58-4b18-4f80-a6c1-e887210e4697","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9db2a108-e10f-444b-b061-53062d043c70","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01EQ2RoGZafD5u7KFjGgtrvk","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→const SECURITY_PATTERNS = [\n     2→  'auth', 'password', 'passwd', 'token', 'query', 'sql',\n     3→  'fetch', 'upload', 'secret', 'env', 'api[._-]?key',\n     4→  'session', 'cookie', 'cors', 'csrf', 'jwt', 'oauth',\n     5→  'encrypt', 'decrypt', 'hash', 'salt', 'credential',\n     6→  'private[._-]?key', 'access[._-]?token', 'refresh[._-]?token',\n     7→];\n     8→\n     9→const PATTERN_REGEX = new RegExp(\n    10→  `\\\\b(${SECURITY_PATTERNS.join('|')})\\\\b`,\n    11→  'gi'\n    12→);\n    13→\n    14→/**\n    15→ * Scan diff text for security-sensitive patterns.\n    16→ * Returns which patterns were found and in which files.\n    17→ */\n    18→export function detectSecurityPatterns(diffText) {\n    19→  if (!diffText || typeof diffText !== 'string') {\n    20→    return { triggered: false, patterns: [], files: [] };\n    21→  }\n    22→\n    23→  const matchedPatterns = new Set();\n    24→  const matchedFiles = new Set();\n    25→  let currentFile = null;\n    26→\n    27→  for (const line of diffText.split('\\n')) {\n    28→    // Track current file from diff headers\n    29→    const fileMatch = line.match(/^(?:diff --git a\\/\\S+ b\\/|[+]{3} b\\/)(.+)/);\n    30→    if (fileMatch) {\n    31→      currentFile = fileMatch[1];\n    32→      continue;\n    33→    }\n    34→\n    35→    // Only scan added/modified lines (starting with +, not +++)\n    36→    if (!line.startsWith('+') || line.startsWith('+++')) continue;\n    37→\n    38→    const lineMatches = line.match(PATTERN_REGEX);\n    39→    if (lineMatches) {\n    40→      for (const m of lineMatches) {\n    41→        matchedPatterns.add(m.toLowerCase());\n    42→      }\n    43→      if (currentFile) {\n    44→        matchedFiles.add(currentFile);\n    45→      }\n    46→    }\n    47→  }\n    48→\n    49→  const patterns = [...matchedPatterns].sort();\n    50→  const files = [...matchedFiles].sort();\n    51→\n    52→  return {\n    53→    triggered: patterns.length > 0,\n    54→    patterns,\n    55→    files,\n    56→  };\n    57→}\n    58→\n    59→/**\n    60→ * Security review dimensions to add when patterns are detected."}]},"uuid":"a3ef3e20-0a3b-41fc-9fa5-c079824debea","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:01.213Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"9db2a108-e10f-444b-b061-53062d043c70","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a3ef3e20-0a3b-41fc-9fa5-c079824debea","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0157QyQf1UcNKAPSnmP9nbHd","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me get the rest of the security sensitivity file and look at the model routing config."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4224,"cache_read_input_tokens":47990,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4224,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdemWgxmLxKx4MEJxH","type":"assistant","uuid":"eadc457f-f7cc-484d-aca5-8f7a242ddfe0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:27.644Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"eadc457f-f7cc-484d-aca5-8f7a242ddfe0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0157QyQf1UcNKAPSnmP9nbHd","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js","offset":58},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4224,"cache_read_input_tokens":47990,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4224,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdemWgxmLxKx4MEJxH","type":"assistant","uuid":"fb255703-53ae-4d46-87c8-6331b5fe007f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:28.539Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fb255703-53ae-4d46-87c8-6331b5fe007f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","uuid":"6af15707-efe2-4d10-b44b-e9b9bdf9b04a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:28.539Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6af15707-efe2-4d10-b44b-e9b9bdf9b04a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","toolUseID":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:28.591Z","uuid":"c43d9a63-ce45-4210-a6d3-723dd277490d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fb255703-53ae-4d46-87c8-6331b5fe007f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01X9CccZbWAYGtfvXdQT3vft","type":"tool_result","content":"    58→\n    59→/**\n    60→ * Security review dimensions to add when patterns are detected.\n    61→ */\n    62→export const SECURITY_REVIEW_DIMENSIONS = [\n    63→  'Injection (SQL, command, template, header)',\n    64→  'Authentication bypass',\n    65→  'Data exposure (PII, secrets, tokens in logs/responses)',\n    66→  'CSRF / SSRF',\n    67→  'XSS (stored, reflected, DOM)',\n    68→  'Secrets leakage (hardcoded keys, env vars in client code)',\n    69→];\n    70→"}]},"uuid":"9a2c92ee-670d-448a-bcff-3dd81c582e4c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:28.591Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"fb255703-53ae-4d46-87c8-6331b5fe007f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9a2c92ee-670d-448a-bcff-3dd81c582e4c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0157QyQf1UcNKAPSnmP9nbHd","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"model.*routing|model.*selection|sonnet|opus|multi.model","output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":15},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4224,"cache_read_input_tokens":47990,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4224,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdemWgxmLxKx4MEJxH","type":"assistant","uuid":"ec8e4534-f5fe-4350-a263-85c5adcc9888","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:29.935Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ec8e4534-f5fe-4350-a263-85c5adcc9888","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","uuid":"8762e129-15f5-4aae-9124-9c9af572230d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:29.938Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8762e129-15f5-4aae-9124-9c9af572230d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","toolUseID":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.059Z","uuid":"de6aa646-d651-40bd-bea6-1a0a90789d92","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ec8e4534-f5fe-4350-a263-85c5adcc9888","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Loj61rSn4rtJ9kDh5xzJse","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 15 files limit: 15, offset: 0\nskills/brainstorming/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\nskills/init-pipeline/SKILL.md\nllms-full.txt\nskills/claude-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/gemini-cli/SKILL.md\ntooling/src/adapters/model-router.js\ntooling/test/adapters/model-router.test.js\nskills/prepare-next/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ntooling/src/checks/runtime-surface.js\nAGENTS.md\ntemplates/task-definition-schema.md\nexpertise/architecture/data/search-architecture.md"}]},"uuid":"6b0cfb36-c6d6-422b-a387-3b841d3c9f60","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.059Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ec8e4534-f5fe-4350-a263-85c5adcc9888","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6b0cfb36-c6d6-422b-a387-3b841d3c9f60","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0157QyQf1UcNKAPSnmP9nbHd","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"conflict.*resolution|disagree|tier.*1.*tier.*2|internal.*codex|codex.*internal","output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4224,"cache_read_input_tokens":47990,"output_tokens":293,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4224},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdemWgxmLxKx4MEJxH","type":"assistant","uuid":"2a5e8dcb-4391-4cec-842f-cc8e1d963d1e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.887Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2a5e8dcb-4391-4cec-842f-cc8e1d963d1e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","uuid":"1afc8093-bca1-4688-9e00-fe5f6c792df1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.888Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1afc8093-bca1-4688-9e00-fe5f6c792df1","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","toolUseID":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.982Z","uuid":"36f70c51-1419-4e04-925a-78cdf69bd6d4","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2a5e8dcb-4391-4cec-842f-cc8e1d963d1e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01JVt7XHRLbcmnhCqCerMDrQ","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 29 files\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\ntooling/src/state/db.js\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-enhancement-decisions.md\nCODE_OF_CONDUCT.md\nexpertise/content/foundations/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/code/dependency-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/code/state-management-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/mobile-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/architecture/data/data-consistency.md\nexpertise/architecture/data/sql-vs-nosql.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/cap-theorem-and-tradeoffs.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/consensus-and-coordination.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/distributed-systems-fundamentals.md\nexpertise/architecture/foundations/domain-driven-design.md\nexpertise/architecture/mobile-architecture/index.md\nexpertise/architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md\nexpertise/architecture/mobile-architecture/offline-first.md\nexpertise/architecture/mobile-architecture/push-and-sync.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/interaction-design.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/user-research.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/feedback-and-states.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/forms-and-input.md\nexpertise/design/patterns/social-and-community.md\nexpertise/performance/backend/rate-limiting-and-throttling.md\nexpertise/performance/mobile/mobile-network.md"}]},"uuid":"32496833-ed51-4aa9-a624-e787a17d0f2e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.981Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2a5e8dcb-4391-4cec-842f-cc8e1d963d1e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"32496833-ed51-4aa9-a624-e787a17d0f2e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01WwrqrWLKDoJCXcDVrNvc78","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/adapters/model-router.js"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1334,"cache_read_input_tokens":52214,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1334,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":8,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReSqgoYtBQ8qkXCCPM","type":"assistant","uuid":"a2d8ff31-290b-4edb-b849-7f0dd8fdadb5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.402Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a2d8ff31-290b-4edb-b849-7f0dd8fdadb5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","uuid":"8d215c82-9bcb-40bf-bdd6-381833fe965f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.405Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8d215c82-9bcb-40bf-bdd6-381833fe965f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","toolUseID":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.494Z","uuid":"511b2b6f-1456-4ac2-bf3e-f2a04faccb9a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a2d8ff31-290b-4edb-b849-7f0dd8fdadb5","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01K2cQEGJZYMEFGCXNwDByJk","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→/**\n     2→ * Model routing table — maps task types to recommended models.\n     3→ * @type {Object<string, {model: string, reason: string}>}\n     4→ */\n     5→const MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE = {\n     6→  // Mechanical tasks — Haiku\n     7→  'fetch-url':           { model: 'haiku', reason: 'Mechanical, no reasoning needed' },\n     8→  'write-handoff':       { model: 'haiku', reason: 'Structured file operations' },\n     9→  'compress-archive':    { model: 'haiku', reason: 'File manipulation' },\n    10→\n    11→  // Comprehension tasks — Sonnet\n    12→  'read-summarize':      { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Comprehension, not deep reasoning' },\n    13→  'write-implementation':{ model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Good spec + plan = mechanical coding' },\n    14→  'task-review':         { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Diff review against clear spec' },\n    15→  'extract-learnings':   { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Structured extraction' },\n    16→  'internal-review':     { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Pattern matching against expertise' },\n    17→  'run-tests':           { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Test execution and analysis' },\n    18→\n    19→  // Judgment tasks — Opus\n    20→  'orchestrate':         { model: 'opus', reason: 'Needs judgment and coordination' },\n    21→  'spec-harden':         { model: 'opus', reason: 'Adversarial thinking required' },\n    22→  'design':              { model: 'opus', reason: 'Creativity + architecture decisions' },\n    23→  'final-review':        { model: 'opus', reason: 'Holistic judgment against original input' },\n    24→  'brainstorm':          { model: 'opus', reason: 'Creative exploration' },\n    25→  'plan':                { model: 'opus', reason: 'Strategic task decomposition' },\n    26→};\n    27→\n    28→/**\n    29→ * Get the recommended model for a task type.\n    30→ *\n    31→ * If multi-model mode is not enabled, returns `{ model: 'inherit' }`.\n    32→ * If config contains `model_overrides`, those take precedence over the\n    33→ * default routing table.  Unknown task types fall back to 'opus' (safe\n    34→ * default — never under-model a task).\n    35→ *\n    36→ * @param {string} taskType - one of the keys in MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE\n    37→ * @param {object} config - project config (may override routing)\n    38→ * @returns {{model: string, reason: string, overridden: boolean}}\n    39→ */\n    40→export function getModelForTask(taskType, config = {}) {\n    41→  if (!isMultiModelEnabled(config)) {\n    42→    return { model: 'inherit', reason: 'Multi-model mode not enabled', overridden: false };\n    43→  }\n    44→\n    45→  // Check config-level overrides first\n    46→  const overrides = config.model_overrides ?? {};\n    47→  if (overrides[taskType]) {\n    48→    return {\n    49→      model: overrides[taskType].model ?? 'opus',\n    50→      reason: overrides[taskType].reason ?? 'Config override',\n    51→      overridden: true,\n    52→    };\n    53→  }\n    54→\n    55→  // Look up the default routing table\n    56→  const entry = MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE[taskType];\n    57→  if (entry) {\n    58→    return { model: entry.model, reason: entry.reason, overridden: false };\n    59→  }\n    60→\n    61→  // Unknown task type — safe default is opus (never under-model)\n    62→  return { model: 'opus', reason: 'Unknown task type — safe default', overridden: false };\n    63→}\n    64→\n    65→/**\n    66→ * Check if multi-model mode is enabled.\n    67→ * @param {object} config\n    68→ * @returns {boolean}\n    69→ */\n    70→export function isMultiModelEnabled(config = {}) {\n    71→  return config.model_mode === 'multi-model';\n    72→}\n    73→\n    74→/**\n    75→ * Get all routing decisions for logging/stats.\n    76→ * @returns {Object<string, {model: string, reason: string}>}\n    77→ */\n    78→export function getRoutingTable() {\n    79→  const copy = {};\n    80→  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE)) {\n    81→    copy[key] = { ...value };\n    82→  }\n    83→  return copy;\n    84→}\n    85→"}]},"uuid":"348d16af-c75b-45f0-9795-f289c08bc213","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.494Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a2d8ff31-290b-4edb-b849-7f0dd8fdadb5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"348d16af-c75b-45f0-9795-f289c08bc213","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01WwrqrWLKDoJCXcDVrNvc78","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/decisions/2026-03-19-enhancement-decisions.md","limit":100},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1334,"cache_read_input_tokens":52214,"output_tokens":171,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1334},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReSqgoYtBQ8qkXCCPM","type":"assistant","uuid":"64465497-3d04-47b3-ac0e-25d534f81390","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.874Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"64465497-3d04-47b3-ac0e-25d534f81390","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","uuid":"6788e343-e054-4464-941a-3e9379ff06ae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.874Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6788e343-e054-4464-941a-3e9379ff06ae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","toolUseID":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.954Z","uuid":"11600473-8442-43a6-8b3f-f4900c1b6b75","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"64465497-3d04-47b3-ac0e-25d534f81390","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01NjHe3CmwfCDu4vq17KztmN","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Wazir Enhancement Decisions — 2026-03-19\n     2→\n     3→Decisions agreed upon during brainstorming session. Each item is implementation-ready.\n     4→\n     5→## Research Summary\n     6→\n     7→| # | Decision | Online Research Needed? | What to Research |\n     8→|---|----------|------------------------|------------------|\n     9→| 1 | Smart context-mode routing | No | Internal implementation — all info is local |\n    10→| 2 | Enforce wazir index | No | Internal tooling, no external deps |\n    11→| 3 | Enforce context-mode for large output | No | Internal, paired with #1 |\n    12→| 4 | Track context savings metrics | No | Metrics design, internal |\n    13→| 5 | Three-tier skill strategy | **Yes** | Blocked on R1 + R2 |\n    14→| 6 | Rich phase reports + gating agent | **Yes** | How other autonomous agent systems handle phase gating, agent self-evaluation patterns, prior art on LLM confidence calibration |\n    15→| 7 | Continuous learning + user input capture | **Yes** | Continuous learning in agent systems, feedback loop patterns, drift prevention, how reinforcement from human feedback is stored and applied |\n    16→| 8 | Autoresearch self-improvement | No | Already researched — decision made |\n    17→| 9 | Composer task-specific agents | **Yes** | Prompt composition patterns, multi-module prompt assembly, token budget strategies for large context injection |\n    18→| R1 | Superpowers skill audit | **Yes** | Latest superpowers GitHub, changelog, roadmap, community health, skill extensibility |\n    19→| R2 | Skill composition infrastructure | **Yes** | Claude Code plugin ecosystem patterns for skill chaining/extension, existing RFCs or discussions |\n    20→\n    21→---\n    22→\n    23→## Agreed\n    24→\n    25→### 1. Smart context-mode routing for Bash commands\n    26→\n    27→**Decision:** Not full enforcement — smart routing via a PreToolUse:Bash hook.\n    28→\n    29→- Small-output commands (git status, ls, short queries) pass through native Bash — no latency tax\n    30→- Known-large-output patterns (test runners, builds, logs, diffs, dependency trees) auto-route through `batch_execute`\n    31→- Threshold: commands whose output routinely exceeds ~30-50 lines\n    32→- Index + context-mode is the preferred research path: index for *where*, context-mode for *what*\n    33→- Skills should still be able to explicitly opt in/out when they know better than the heuristic\n    34→\n    35→### 2. Enforce wazir index for codebase exploration\n    36→\n    37→**Decision:** All codebase exploration MUST use `wazir index` as the first step.\n    38→\n    39→- Never spawn heavyweight exploration agents that brute-force read dozens of files\n    40→- Flow: `wazir index search-symbols` / `wazir recall` → locate targets → then read only what's needed\n    41→- Subagents and skills must query the index before falling back to direct file reads\n    42→- If no index exists, build one first (`wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`)\n    43→\n    44→### 3. Enforce context-mode for large-output commands\n    45→\n    46→**Decision:** Context-mode is mandatory for commands with routinely large output.\n    47→\n    48→**Must use context-mode (`batch_execute` / `execute_file`):**\n    49→- Test runners (npm test, vitest, jest, pytest, etc.)\n    50→- Build commands (npm run build, tsc, etc.)\n    51→- Dependency trees (npm ls, pip list, etc.)\n    52→- Large git diffs (`git diff` with many files)\n    53→- Log tailing / large file reads (>50 lines)\n    54→- Linting / static analysis output\n    55→- CI/CD output parsing\n    56→\n    57→**Pass through native Bash:**\n    58→- git status, git log (short), git branch\n    59→- ls, pwd, mkdir, cp, mv\n    60→- wazir CLI commands with short output (doctor, index build, capture)\n    61→- Any command known to produce <30 lines\n    62→\n    63→### 4. Track context savings metrics\n    64→\n    65→**Decision:** Every index query and context-mode invocation must update a running usage counter.\n    66→\n    67→- Track per-session: queries made, estimated tokens saved, bytes avoided in context\n    68→- Track per-tool breakdown: index lookups vs. `execute_file` vs. `batch_execute` vs. `fetch_and_index`\n    69→- Store in run state (e.g., `.wazir/runs/<id>/usage.json` or equivalent)\n    70→- Surface via `wazir status` or a dedicated `wazir stats` subcommand\n    71→- If no tracking mechanism exists yet, build one — we can't optimize what we don't measure\n    72→\n    73→### 5. Three-tier skill strategy — delegate, augment, own\n    74→\n    75→**Decision:** Stop forking superpowers skills wholesale. Categorize each into one of three tiers:\n    76→\n    77→| Tier | Strategy | Naming |\n    78→|------|----------|--------|\n    79→| **Delegate** | Use superpowers skill as-is. Delete Wazir fork. | `superpowers:<name>` only |\n    80→| **Augment** | Invoke superpowers skill + inject a Wazir `CONTEXT.md` addendum (additive only, no overrides) | `superpowers:<name>` invoked with Wazir context |\n    81→| **Own** | Wazir-original or structurally rewritten skill. Rename to avoid conflict with superpowers. | `wz:<unique-name>` only |\n    82→\n    83→**Rules:**\n    84→- Augment addenda must be strictly additive — no \"replace step N\" or \"ignore this part\"\n    85→- Owned skills must have a distinct name from any superpowers skill to prevent dual-registration confusion\n    86→- Delegated skills: delete the Wazir `skills/<name>/` directory entirely\n    87→\n    88→**Status:** Blocked on Research Phase (see below).\n    89→\n    90→---\n    91→\n    92→## Research Required\n    93→\n    94→### R1. Superpowers skill audit and tier classification\n    95→\n    96→**Why this matters:**\n    97→We're choosing between maintaining our own forks (current approach — high maintenance, falls behind upstream) and delegating to a well-maintained plugin (lower maintenance, auto-updates, but less control). Getting this wrong means either: (a) we fork everything and slowly diverge from improvements the superpowers community ships, or (b) we delegate too much and lose Wazir-specific behavior that matters. This is an architectural decision that affects every future skill interaction, so it must be evidence-based.\n    98→\n    99→**What the research must cover:**\n   100→"}]},"uuid":"bf26e80c-2fd6-4476-b64c-a2736d7c3fe0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:38.954Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"64465497-3d04-47b3-ac0e-25d534f81390","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bf26e80c-2fd6-4476-b64c-a2736d7c3fe0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012FHqTxsLToN3ESL6VU89LB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me research external systems. Let me fetch information about Google's code review process, GitHub CODEOWNERS, and CodeRabbit."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3454,"cache_read_input_tokens":53548,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3454,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfqmMdsn8HuiMs3pm1","type":"assistant","uuid":"3cd5d92b-f2ca-4b28-8390-d4f74278e11f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:57.946Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3cd5d92b-f2ca-4b28-8390-d4f74278e11f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012FHqTxsLToN3ESL6VU89LB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Y8cb93RLsme7M3xzrwKDSj","name":"ToolSearch","input":{"query":"select:WebSearch","max_results":1},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3454,"cache_read_input_tokens":53548,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3454,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfqmMdsn8HuiMs3pm1","type":"assistant","uuid":"c3b30bae-0f19-431b-8088-be1bf1621024","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:58.526Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c3b30bae-0f19-431b-8088-be1bf1621024","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","tool_use_id":"toolu_01Y8cb93RLsme7M3xzrwKDSj","content":[{"type":"tool_reference","tool_name":"WebSearch"}]}]},"uuid":"ef6f81e0-3212-4ba7-a131-4f9c960cee00","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:58.526Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"c3b30bae-0f19-431b-8088-be1bf1621024","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ef6f81e0-3212-4ba7-a131-4f9c960cee00","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_016UQLDJcCiLrnVycwoXMdCY","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01AyMSB5r2znhLWfymW5V9Va","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Google code review process author reviewer approver chain engineering practices"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":637,"cache_read_input_tokens":57002,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":637,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgWRYhCkTqqHw6ioDS","type":"assistant","uuid":"a6b9d3e8-df0f-465c-8230-fc88c4dbea9c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:05.551Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a6b9d3e8-df0f-465c-8230-fc88c4dbea9c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_016UQLDJcCiLrnVycwoXMdCY","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01JujmixmvbB1eFiU3npnQLp","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"GitHub CODEOWNERS required reviewers how it works branch protection"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":637,"cache_read_input_tokens":57002,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":637,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgWRYhCkTqqHw6ioDS","type":"assistant","uuid":"f7c42e89-35bf-46b6-a28e-61d45d51dabb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:06.142Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f7c42e89-35bf-46b6-a28e-61d45d51dabb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_016UQLDJcCiLrnVycwoXMdCY","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Vkz6qwJLbEHV7CahcJqFJm","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CodeRabbit AI code review how it integrates with human review workflow"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":637,"cache_read_input_tokens":57002,"output_tokens":160,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":637},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgWRYhCkTqqHw6ioDS","type":"assistant","uuid":"7621fb11-4902-4476-b126-bb00eeac89ce","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:06.479Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7621fb11-4902-4476-b126-bb00eeac89ce","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Google code review process author reviewer approver chain"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01AyMSB5r2znhLWfymW5V9Va","uuid":"be2fe5ea-83ed-4a29-82a7-2ad3b90079b9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:07.304Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"be2fe5ea-83ed-4a29-82a7-2ad3b90079b9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"GitHub CODEOWNERS required reviewers branch protection how it works"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JujmixmvbB1eFiU3npnQLp","uuid":"b10bd477-f794-47ef-9ceb-807b67393c63","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:08.373Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b10bd477-f794-47ef-9ceb-807b67393c63","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CodeRabbit AI code review human review workflow integration"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Vkz6qwJLbEHV7CahcJqFJm","uuid":"6919d7d8-8deb-4d4a-889f-ce42dec6bd61","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:08.550Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6919d7d8-8deb-4d4a-889f-ce42dec6bd61","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Google code review process author reviewer approver chain"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01QF2nfAguyFM6kGo88BcZGM","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01AyMSB5r2znhLWfymW5V9Va","uuid":"104ba5cf-7aea-4017-871c-919c9a60cbfe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:08.862Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"104ba5cf-7aea-4017-871c-919c9a60cbfe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"GitHub CODEOWNERS required reviewers branch protection how it works"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01Ju3ixCNQsxVDKQEZgQWq5t","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JujmixmvbB1eFiU3npnQLp","uuid":"ae94a481-1d61-4360-aee2-5aea1399baf2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:09.867Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ae94a481-1d61-4360-aee2-5aea1399baf2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CodeRabbit AI code review human review workflow integration"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01REmwABic1QyeHgAAjYY3St","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Vkz6qwJLbEHV7CahcJqFJm","uuid":"582f0f25-25fe-4366-a416-bfc6379ff5c3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:10.267Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f7c42e89-35bf-46b6-a28e-61d45d51dabb","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01JujmixmvbB1eFiU3npnQLp","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"GitHub CODEOWNERS required reviewers how it works branch protection\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Allow code owners to review their own PRs · community · Discussion #14866\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/14866\"},{\"title\":\"About protected branches - GitHub Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches\"},{\"title\":\"Managing a branch protection rule - GitHub Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/managing-a-branch-protection-rule\"},{\"title\":\"About code owners - GitHub Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-code-owners\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub CODEOWNERS: A Developer’s Code Review Guide\",\"url\":\"https://www.arnica.io/blog/what-every-developer-should-know-about-github-codeowners\"},{\"title\":\"CODEOWNER Required Reviews · community · Discussion #22522\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/22522\"},{\"title\":\"How to enforce pull request reviewers in GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://www.graphite.com/guides/how-to-enforce-pull-request-reviewers-github\"},{\"title\":\"How to protect GitHub projects from non-reviewed code and force code review culture\",\"url\":\"https://www.bornfight.com/blog/how-to-protect-github-projects-from-non-reviewed-code-and-force-code-review-culture/\"},{\"title\":\"Set up a GitHub Branch Protection Rule to require the Repository’s code owner’s approval for branch merging and safeguard the codeowner file. | by SaurabhPanth | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@saurabhpanth26/set-up-a-github-branch-protection-rule-to-require-the-repositorys-code-owner-s-approval-for-branch-dc14c533a708\"},{\"title\":\"Available rules for rulesets - GitHub Docs\",\"url\":\"https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-rulesets/available-rules-for-rulesets\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's how GitHub CODEOWNERS works with required reviewers and branch protection:\n\n## How CODEOWNERS Works\n\nA CODEOWNERS file is created in the .github/, root, or docs/ directory of the repository, and GitHub searches for them in that order and uses the first one it finds. The pattern in the file is followed by one or more GitHub usernames or team names using the standard @username or @org/team-name format.\n\nCode owners are automatically requested for review when someone opens a pull request that modifies code that they own.\n\n## Branch Protection Integration\n\nTo enforce code owner reviews, you need to enable branch protection settings:\n\nTo require review from a code owner when the pull request affects code that has a designated owner, select \"Require review from Code Owners\" in the branch protection rule. If code has multiple owners, an approval from any of the code owners will be sufficient to meet this requirement.\n\nIf you choose to require reviews from code owners, any pull request that affects code with a code owner must be approved by that code owner before the pull request can be merged into the protected branch.\n\n## How It Works in Practice\n\nGitHub checks for branch protection rules and automatically assigns reviewers according to the CODEOWNERS file. When \"Require review from Code Owners\" is enabled in branch protection settings, after the user or Team with effective Write permission approved the pull request, merging is allowed.\n\nAdditionally, if the diff changes (for example, because a contributor pushes new changes to the pull request branch), the approving review is dismissed as stale, and the pull request cannot be merged until someone approves the work again.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"b1248f87-bcef-4272-9af9-cee48b715393","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:14.239Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f7c42e89-35bf-46b6-a28e-61d45d51dabb","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7621fb11-4902-4476-b126-bb00eeac89ce","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Vkz6qwJLbEHV7CahcJqFJm","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CodeRabbit AI code review how it integrates with human review workflow\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"AI Code Reviews | CodeRabbit | Try for Free\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/\"},{\"title\":\"CodeRabbit Documentation - AI code reviews on pull requests, IDE, and CLI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.coderabbit.ai/\"},{\"title\":\"CodeRabbit CLI | AI Code Reviews in CLI\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/cli\"},{\"title\":\"Free AI code reviews for VS Code | Code Reviews\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/ide\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Review with CodeRabbit. Introduction | by Kuldeep Singh | ManoMano Tech team | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/manomano-tech/ai-code-review-with-coderabbit-ed6ed610f481\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Review Before You Deploy: Our Experience with CodeRabbit\",\"url\":\"https://www.deployhq.com/blog/ai-code-review-before-you-deploy-our-experience-with-coderabbit\"},{\"title\":\"Improving Code Reviews with AI: Our Experience with CodeRabbit - Flowing Code\",\"url\":\"https://www.flowingcode.com/en/improving-code-reviews-with-ai-our-experience-with-coderabbit/\"},{\"title\":\"How CodeRabbit built its AI code review agent with Google Cloud Run | Google Cloud Blog\",\"url\":\"https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/how-coderabbit-built-its-ai-code-review-agent-with-google-cloud-run\"},{\"title\":\"AWS Marketplace: CodeRabbit - AI Code Reviews\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-wkkkre4fgelwq\"},{\"title\":\"Hands-On Review: CodeRabbit vs. Manual Code Review for Developers\",\"url\":\"https://apidog.com/blog/coderabbit-review/\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's how CodeRabbit AI integrates with human code review workflows:\n\n## Integration Model\n\nCodeRabbit does the heavy lifting and spots hard to find issues, while humans do the final 10%. It's designed to complement human review, not replace it.\n\n## Multi-Layer Review Process\n\nCodeRabbit operates at multiple stages of development:\n\n- **Pre-commit Reviews**: The CLI enables pre-commit reviews of both staged and unstaged changes, creating a multi-layered review process\n- **PR Stage**: It works directly in Pull Requests on GitHub/GitLab and in your IDE, focusing on giving human-like feedback: readability, maintainability, edge cases, and best practices\n\n## Workflow Placement\n\nThe workflow is: Code → PR → AI Review → Human Review → Merge → Deploy, with CodeRabbit catching issues early.\n\n## Key Integration Features\n\nWhen you open a pull request, CodeRabbit summarizes the PR and adds comments flagging potential issues after a few minutes of analysis. Auto-generated summaries and walkthroughs are very helpful for human code reviewers.\n\n## Reducing Reviewer Burden\n\nCodeRabbit autonomously identifies issues ranging from readability concerns to logic bugs and best practice deviations, which has dramatically reduced the time reviewers spend on initial evaluations, allowing them to focus on deeper, more meaningful code discussions.\n\n## Learning and Feedback\n\nCodeRabbit learns from your suggestions and gets better over time, allowing it to adapt to your team's specific coding standards and preferences.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"df8b75e4-fd3e-4b59-a143-d0ada6629b1d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:15.285Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"7621fb11-4902-4476-b126-bb00eeac89ce","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a6b9d3e8-df0f-465c-8230-fc88c4dbea9c","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01AyMSB5r2znhLWfymW5V9Va","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Google code review process author reviewer approver chain engineering practices\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Code Review - Software Engineering at Google\",\"url\":\"https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book/html/ch09.html\"},{\"title\":\"Code Review Developer Guide by Google - Slab Library\",\"url\":\"https://slab.com/library/templates/google-code-review/\"},{\"title\":\"The Standard of Code Review | eng-practices\",\"url\":\"https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/standard.html\"},{\"title\":\"Code review process | Blockly | Google for Developers\",\"url\":\"https://developers.google.com/blockly/guides/contribute/get-started/pr_review_process\"},{\"title\":\"How Google does code review\",\"url\":\"https://graphite.com/blog/how-google-does-code-review\"},{\"title\":\"Introduction {#intro} | eng-practices\",\"url\":\"https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/\"},{\"title\":\"Critique: Google's Code Review Tool\",\"url\":\"https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book/html/ch19.html\"},{\"title\":\"upcoming code review requirement changes\",\"url\":\"https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/K7oGURi0wTM\"},{\"title\":\"Modern Code Review: A Case Study at Google Caitlin Sadowski, Emma Söderberg,\",\"url\":\"https://sback.it/publications/icse2018seip.pdf\"},{\"title\":\"Google’s Code Review Guidelines (GitHub Adaptation) | Onur Solmaz blog\",\"url\":\"https://solmaz.io/google-eng-practices-github\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about Google's code review process, author/reviewer/approver chain, and engineering practices:\n\n## Overview\n\nA code review is a process where someone other than the author(s) of a piece of code examines that code. At Google, we use code review to maintain the quality of our code and products.\n\n## The Review Process Flow\n\nWhen the author is satisfied with the diff of the change, they mail the change to one or more reviewers. This process notifies those reviewers, asking them to view and comment on the snapshot. Reviewers open the change in the code review tool and post comments on the diff. The author modifies the change and uploads new snapshots based on the feedback and then replies back to the reviewers.\n\n## Three Approval Requirements\n\nThere are three aspects of review that require \"approval\" for any given change at Google: A correctness and comprehension check from another engineer that the code is appropriate and does what the author claims it does. This is reflected in the LGTM permissions \"bit,\" which will be set after a peer reviewer agrees that the code \"looks good\" to them. Approval from one of the code owners that the code is appropriate for this particular part of the codebase (and can be checked into a particular directory). Approval from someone with language \"readability\" that the code conforms to the language's style and best practices.\n\n## Two-Step Review Process\n\nIn practice, most code reviews that require more than one approval usually go through a two-step process: gaining an LGTM from a peer engineer, and then seeking approval from appropriate code owner/readability reviewer(s). This allows the two roles to focus on different aspects of the code review and saves review time. The primary reviewer can focus on code correctness and the general validity of the code change; the code owner can focus on whether this change is appropriate for their part of the codebase without having to focus on the details of each line of code.\n\n## Review Speed and Efficiency\n\nDevelopers have to wait for initial feedback on their change a median time of under an hour for small changes and about 5 hours for very large changes. The overall (all code sizes) median latency for the entire review process is under 4 hours.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"8bf349b4-055f-4a69-9bbc-82682823c637","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:15.913Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a6b9d3e8-df0f-465c-8230-fc88c4dbea9c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8bf349b4-055f-4a69-9bbc-82682823c637","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01QwcEnE5tRTCEtBuTeioUFE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me search for more specific details on Google's three approval types and how CodeRabbit handles disagreements."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1830,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1095,"cache_read_input_tokens":57639,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1095,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERi6t118QtQgMCZERqc","type":"assistant","uuid":"18ffee3e-84c8-48ec-b36e-d2f18fe00d74","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:27.283Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"18ffee3e-84c8-48ec-b36e-d2f18fe00d74","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01QwcEnE5tRTCEtBuTeioUFE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_013WPvAC7Q2yZtKJNZ7WcqDF","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Google code review LGTM readability approval code owner three separate approvals Critique tool"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1830,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1095,"cache_read_input_tokens":57639,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1095,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERi6t118QtQgMCZERqc","type":"assistant","uuid":"619de7ae-528d-48ca-9744-15e4c2f5df62","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:27.968Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"619de7ae-528d-48ca-9744-15e4c2f5df62","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01QwcEnE5tRTCEtBuTeioUFE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01LVuAnEKVUHdN8zJPd5WGVW","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CodeRabbit AI review conflict human reviewer disagree resolution override 2025 2026"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1830,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1095,"cache_read_input_tokens":57639,"output_tokens":148,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1095},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERi6t118QtQgMCZERqc","type":"assistant","uuid":"ab9bfeb9-735e-46be-a624-df69a87194ae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:28.650Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ab9bfeb9-735e-46be-a624-df69a87194ae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Google code review LGTM readability approval code owner"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_013WPvAC7Q2yZtKJNZ7WcqDF","uuid":"290b4239-a358-42d5-a2f0-eaf9a20202d3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:29.979Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"290b4239-a358-42d5-a2f0-eaf9a20202d3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CodeRabbit AI review conflict human reviewer disagree resolution override"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01LVuAnEKVUHdN8zJPd5WGVW","uuid":"cae5ecda-7e4b-43b1-9ff4-0837cbfac27b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:30.414Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cae5ecda-7e4b-43b1-9ff4-0837cbfac27b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Google code review LGTM readability approval code owner"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01JzK4yfW7ERW7sW8qxpgjJi","parentToolUseID":"toolu_013WPvAC7Q2yZtKJNZ7WcqDF","uuid":"fd1a2c8a-8300-4099-89d1-1a953b5dcf81","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:32.089Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fd1a2c8a-8300-4099-89d1-1a953b5dcf81","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CodeRabbit AI review conflict human reviewer disagree resolution override"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01PU9svSmVfDmfR67F4sVUAi","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01LVuAnEKVUHdN8zJPd5WGVW","uuid":"b9886ec5-c003-48e4-b874-4d231803ca93","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:32.371Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ab9bfeb9-735e-46be-a624-df69a87194ae","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01LVuAnEKVUHdN8zJPd5WGVW","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CodeRabbit AI review conflict human reviewer disagree resolution override 2025 2026\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"CodeRabbit Documentation - AI code reviews on pull requests, IDE, and CLI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/commands\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Reviews | CodeRabbit | Try for Free\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - VirtualAgentics/review-bot-automator: Intelligent conflict resolution for GitHub PR comments with CodeRabbit AI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/VirtualAgentics/review-bot-automator\"},{\"title\":\"CodeRabbit for AI code reviews · Issue #15439 · OrchardCMS/OrchardCore\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore/issues/15439\"},{\"title\":\"AI vs human code gen report: AI code creates 1.7x more issues\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Review Before You Deploy: Our Experience with CodeRabbit\",\"url\":\"https://www.deployhq.com/blog/ai-code-review-before-you-deploy-our-experience-with-coderabbit\"},{\"title\":\"CodeRabbit Review: AI-Based Code Review Process for Enterprise Teams - ALMtoolbox NewsALMtoolbox News\",\"url\":\"https://www.almtoolbox.com/blog/coderabbit-overview-code-review-ai/\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Review on GitHub: Copilot vs CodeRabbit vs an Agent That Reads Your Codebase\",\"url\":\"https://cotera.co/articles/ai-code-review-github\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - coderabbitai/ai-pr-reviewer: AI-based Pull Request Summarizer and Reviewer with Chat Capabilities. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/coderabbitai/ai-pr-reviewer\"},{\"title\":\"Code with AI, review with CodeRabbit’s IDE extension, apply fixes\",\"url\":\"https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/code-with-ai-review-with-coderabbits-ide-extension-apply-fixes-in-one-click\"}]\n\nBased on the web search results, here's what I found about CodeRabbit AI's approach to handling conflicts between AI and human reviewer disagreements:\n\n## Learning from Human Feedback\n\nIf the team disagrees with a suggestion, CodeRabbit will adapt in the future. This indicates that the system has a feedback mechanism that allows it to learn from instances where human reviewers override or disagree with its recommendations.\n\n## Resolution Through Custom Rules\n\nRather than having a direct \"override\" resolution mechanism, custom review instructions can be defined via a YAML file, making the review more tailored to the project's standards over time. This suggests that conflicts are resolved by configuring the AI to align with team preferences and standards.\n\n## Complementary Role\n\nCodeRabbit is designed to complement human review, not replace it. This positions the AI as a first-pass reviewer rather than an authoritative decision-maker, meaning human judgment can override AI suggestions when necessary.\n\n## Feedback-Driven Improvement\n\nCodeRabbit is adding the ability to provide feedback on suggestions, so the agent automatically learns which suggestions you like and dislike. This indicates ongoing development to improve how the system handles user disagreements.\n\nThe search results don't reveal a specific documented \"conflict resolution protocol\" from 2025-2026, but rather show that disagreements are handled through a combination of learning from feedback, customization options, and maintaining humans as the ultimate decision-makers in the review process.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"4f0fe6f6-18cb-4a74-8a2c-2482162c8e26","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:36.432Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ab9bfeb9-735e-46be-a624-df69a87194ae","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"619de7ae-528d-48ca-9744-15e4c2f5df62","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_013WPvAC7Q2yZtKJNZ7WcqDF","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Google code review LGTM readability approval code owner three separate approvals Critique tool\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"How Google does code review\",\"url\":\"https://graphite.com/blog/how-google-does-code-review\"},{\"title\":\"Code Review - Software Engineering at Google\",\"url\":\"https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book/html/ch09.html\"},{\"title\":\"Code Review Developer Guide by Google - Slab Library\",\"url\":\"https://slab.com/library/templates/google-code-review/\"},{\"title\":\"Code Reviews at Google are lightweight and fast - Dr. Michaela Greiler\",\"url\":\"https://www.michaelagreiler.com/code-reviews-at-google/\"},{\"title\":\"How Google takes the pain out of code reviews, with 97% dev satisfaction\",\"url\":\"https://read.engineerscodex.com/p/how-google-takes-the-pain-out-of\"},{\"title\":\"Google’s Code Review Guidelines (GitHub Adaptation) | Onur Solmaz blog\",\"url\":\"https://solmaz.io/google-eng-practices-github\"},{\"title\":\"Summary of Code Review [Software Engineering at Google Book — Chapter 9] | by Songpon Ninwong | Finnomena\",\"url\":\"https://blog.finnomena.com/summary-of-code-review-software-engineering-at-google-book-chapter-9-ada6c2d98ebb\"},{\"title\":\"The Standard of Code Review | eng-practices\",\"url\":\"https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/standard.html\"},{\"title\":\"Software Engineering at Google\",\"url\":\"https://abseil-io.translate.goog/resources/swe-book/html/ch09.html?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=pt&_x_tr_pto=tc\"},{\"title\":\"What Does LGTM Mean in Code Review? When to Comment (and When to Wait) | Propel\",\"url\":\"https://www.propelcode.ai/blog/lgtm-meaning-code-review\"}]\n\nI found comprehensive information about Google's code review process. Here's what I found regarding your query:\n\n## Google's Three-Level Code Review Approval System\n\nGoogle requires three levels of mandatory approvals before changes are submitted, with the first two — LGTM and code owners — being familiar to engineers using GitHub.\n\n### The Three Approval Types:\n\n1. **LGTM (Looks Good To Me)**: Anyone can give an LGTM which signifies that the core business logic of the change checks out (equivalent to a regular approving GitHub PR review).\n\n2. **Code Owner Approval**: When you make a change in a given file, you need approval of whoever is listed as the owner for the file or containing directory.\n\n3. **Readability Approval**: Readability is a Google-specific concept. This approval verifies that the code conforms to the language's style and best practices, checking whether the code is written in the manner expected.\n\n### Critique Tool\n\nCritique is Google's code review tool, allowing engineers to efficiently review and submit code changes. Gerrit and Critique introduce a first-class treatment for managing reviewer action requirements.\n\n### Flexibility\n\nAlthough this level of control sounds onerous—and, admittedly, it sometimes is—most reviews have one person assuming all three roles, which speeds up the process quite a bit.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"36358927-7ed5-49cd-ae93-7e621b278222","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:36.783Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"619de7ae-528d-48ca-9744-15e4c2f5df62","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"36358927-7ed5-49cd-ae93-7e621b278222","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01HPGUQZ5F7xoah69T3QNdyb","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me check the existing Wazir learning pipeline and finding persistence to understand how tier 1/tier 2 findings interact."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":906,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2824,"cache_read_input_tokens":58734,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2824,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERj9djEKtBtv4ZTmpfD","type":"assistant","uuid":"06c868ec-fac3-4b43-8e79-b211edc20624","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:42.836Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"06c868ec-fac3-4b43-8e79-b211edc20624","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01HPGUQZ5F7xoah69T3QNdyb","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js","limit":80},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":906,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2824,"cache_read_input_tokens":58734,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2824,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERj9djEKtBtv4ZTmpfD","type":"assistant","uuid":"5f37a27e-65b7-4b8e-a4ce-777510b927fa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:44.349Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5f37a27e-65b7-4b8e-a4ce-777510b927fa","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","parentToolUseID":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","uuid":"55e2e036-6924-496a-a5fe-c1982bd88fd8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:44.351Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"55e2e036-6924-496a-a5fe-c1982bd88fd8","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","toolUseID":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:44.423Z","uuid":"33c11cb3-9e82-43ec-8f14-416c01bc320c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"5f37a27e-65b7-4b8e-a4ce-777510b927fa","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_015VTuSGYdThyNvSA6Y45gZg","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→import crypto from 'node:crypto';\n     2→import fs from 'node:fs';\n     3→import path from 'node:path';\n     4→import { DatabaseSync } from 'node:sqlite';\n     5→\n     6→function getStateDatabasePath(stateRoot) {\n     7→  return path.join(stateRoot, 'state', 'state.sqlite');\n     8→}\n     9→\n    10→function hashDescription(description) {\n    11→  return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(description).digest('hex');\n    12→}\n    13→\n    14→function ensureStateSchema(db) {\n    15→  db.exec(`\n    16→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS learnings (\n    17→      id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,\n    18→      source_run TEXT NOT NULL,\n    19→      category TEXT NOT NULL,\n    20→      scope_roles TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    21→      scope_stacks TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    22→      scope_concerns TEXT DEFAULT '',\n    23→      confidence TEXT DEFAULT 'medium' CHECK(confidence IN ('low','medium','high')),\n    24→      recurrence_count INTEGER DEFAULT 1,\n    25→      content TEXT NOT NULL,\n    26→      created_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),\n    27→      last_applied TEXT,\n    28→      expires_at TEXT\n    29→    );\n    30→\n    31→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS findings (\n    32→      id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,\n    33→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    34→      phase TEXT NOT NULL,\n    35→      source TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(source IN ('internal','codex','self-audit','gemini')),\n    36→      severity TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(severity IN ('critical','high','medium','low')),\n    37→      description TEXT NOT NULL,\n    38→      resolved INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    39→      finding_hash TEXT NOT NULL,\n    40→      created_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now'))\n    41→    );\n    42→\n    43→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS audit_history (\n    44→      id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,\n    45→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    46→      date TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (date('now')),\n    47→      finding_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    48→      fix_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    49→      manual_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    50→      quality_score_before REAL,\n    51→      quality_score_after REAL\n    52→    );\n    53→\n    54→    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS usage_aggregate (\n    55→      id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,\n    56→      run_id TEXT NOT NULL,\n    57→      date TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (date('now')),\n    58→      tokens_saved INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    59→      bytes_avoided INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    60→      savings_ratio REAL DEFAULT 0.0,\n    61→      index_queries INTEGER DEFAULT 0,\n    62→      routing_decisions INTEGER DEFAULT 0\n    63→    );\n    64→\n    65→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_learnings_category ON learnings(category);\n    66→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_findings_run_id ON findings(run_id);\n    67→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_findings_finding_hash ON findings(finding_hash);\n    68→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_audit_history_run_id ON audit_history(run_id);\n    69→    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_usage_aggregate_run_id ON usage_aggregate(run_id);\n    70→  `);\n    71→}\n    72→\n    73→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    74→// Database lifecycle\n    75→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    76→\n    77→export function openStateDb(stateRoot) {\n    78→  const databasePath = getStateDatabasePath(stateRoot);\n    79→  fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(databasePath), { recursive: true });\n    80→  const db = new DatabaseSync(databasePath, { timeout: 5000 });"}]},"uuid":"059f46d8-0959-4872-904d-2b574a522e6e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:44.423Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"5f37a27e-65b7-4b8e-a4ce-777510b927fa","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"059f46d8-0959-4872-904d-2b574a522e6e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01HPGUQZ5F7xoah69T3QNdyb","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"insertFinding|getRecurring|finding_hash|attribution","output_mode":"content","path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":906,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2824,"cache_read_input_tokens":58734,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2824,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERj9djEKtBtv4ZTmpfD","type":"assistant","uuid":"735f1006-2eea-43e7-aac7-7275875c8c9f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:45.797Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"735f1006-2eea-43e7-aac7-7275875c8c9f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","uuid":"f85a6806-a164-4140-866b-dac16bbd37f2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:45.800Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f85a6806-a164-4140-866b-dac16bbd37f2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","toolUseID":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:45.867Z","uuid":"db9ae8bc-9812-4b48-a783-78af445591a5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"735f1006-2eea-43e7-aac7-7275875c8c9f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Bshajg6SBGRwWcv78nzQWC","type":"tool_result","content":"39:      finding_hash TEXT NOT NULL,\n67:    CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_findings_finding_hash ON findings(finding_hash);\n158:export function getRecurringLearnings(db, minCount) {\n170:export function insertFinding(db, record) {\n172:  const findingHash = record.finding_hash ?? hashDescription(record.description);\n176:    INSERT INTO findings (id, run_id, phase, source, severity, description, finding_hash, created_at)\n200:export function getRecurringFindingHashes(db, minOccurrences) {\n202:    SELECT finding_hash, COUNT(*) AS count\n204:    GROUP BY finding_hash"}]},"uuid":"0c33a767-a313-441d-b014-4f16c1afcf4a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:40:45.866Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"735f1006-2eea-43e7-aac7-7275875c8c9f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0c33a767-a313-441d-b014-4f16c1afcf4a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01GXg6QwbQDKTr9p2A4EeWFW","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow I have a thorough understanding of the entire system. Let me read the finding persistence functions to complete the picture."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2516,"cache_read_input_tokens":61558,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2516,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERkmXkXuSx9H3SZBBVJ","type":"assistant","uuid":"1be52aef-70b1-4fcf-a5f4-72873c7180dc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:03.523Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1be52aef-70b1-4fcf-a5f4-72873c7180dc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01GXg6QwbQDKTr9p2A4EeWFW","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js","offset":155,"limit":60},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2516,"cache_read_input_tokens":61558,"output_tokens":141,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2516},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERkmXkXuSx9H3SZBBVJ","type":"assistant","uuid":"6558edd6-ec07-4ff6-8c68-04ae1ff362e7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:04.089Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6558edd6-ec07-4ff6-8c68-04ae1ff362e7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","parentToolUseID":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","uuid":"6b22885e-68d7-4647-a390-94680e9985d6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:04.091Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6b22885e-68d7-4647-a390-94680e9985d6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","toolUseID":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:04.182Z","uuid":"2e537f56-a31a-4782-8693-1cc2f12a08a7","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6558edd6-ec07-4ff6-8c68-04ae1ff362e7","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"993bfee3-85a0-4b7f-b82a-ba53f3d6daa1","agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_015TcDEm2WLy5b7u2AY19NNk","type":"tool_result","content":"   155→  `).run(now, id);\n   156→}\n   157→\n   158→export function getRecurringLearnings(db, minCount) {\n   159→  return db.prepare(`\n   160→    SELECT * FROM learnings\n   161→    WHERE recurrence_count >= ?\n   162→    ORDER BY recurrence_count DESC\n   163→  `).all(minCount);\n   164→}\n   165→\n   166→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   167→// Findings CRUD\n   168→// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n   169→\n   170→export function insertFinding(db, record) {\n   171→  const id = crypto.randomUUID();\n   172→  const findingHash = record.finding_hash ?? hashDescription(record.description);\n   173→  const createdAt = new Date().toISOString();\n   174→\n   175→  db.prepare(`\n   176→    INSERT INTO findings (id, run_id, phase, source, severity, description, finding_hash, created_at)\n   177→    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)\n   178→  `).run(\n   179→    id,\n   180→    record.run_id,\n   181→    record.phase,\n   182→    record.source,\n   183→    record.severity,\n   184→    record.description,\n   185→    findingHash,\n   186→    createdAt,\n   187→  );\n   188→\n   189→  return id;\n   190→}\n   191→\n   192→export function getFindingsByRun(db, runId) {\n   193→  return db.prepare(`\n   194→    SELECT * FROM findings\n   195→    WHERE run_id = ?\n   196→    ORDER BY created_at ASC\n   197→  `).all(runId);\n   198→}\n   199→\n   200→export function getRecurringFindingHashes(db, minOccurrences) {\n   201→  return db.prepare(`\n   202→    SELECT finding_hash, COUNT(*) AS count\n   203→    FROM findings\n   204→    GROUP BY finding_hash\n   205→    HAVING COUNT(*) >= ?\n   206→    ORDER BY count DESC\n   207→  `).all(minOccurrences);\n   208→}\n   209→\n   210→export function resolveFinding(db, id) {\n   211→  db.prepare(`\n   212→    UPDATE findings SET resolved = 1 WHERE id = ?\n   213→  `).run(id);\n   214→}"}]},"uuid":"3ffd8cbc-090e-4b75-936b-7d8b39bd9b90","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:04.182Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6558edd6-ec07-4ff6-8c68-04ae1ff362e7","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3ffd8cbc-090e-4b75-936b-7d8b39bd9b90","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a7c46d1bba1056ed2","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01QFGkAecSdwnhii1DnzrKYp","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI now have all the information needed. Let me compile the complete research output.\n\n---\n\n## Two-Tier Review Architecture for Wazir: Research and Design\n\n### 1. External Systems Analysis\n\n#### 1A. Superpowers Two-Stage Review (subagent-driven-development)\n\nThe `wz:subagent-driven-development` skill (`/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`) implements a two-stage review within a single tier:\n\n**Stage 1 -- Spec Compliance** (template at `spec-reviewer-prompt.md`):\n- Dispatches a fresh subagent with an adversarial framing (\"The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete.\")\n- Checks three dimensions: missing requirements, extra/unneeded work, misunderstandings\n- Verification method: read actual code, compare to spec line by line, distrust the implementer's self-report\n- Binary output: PASS or FAIL with file:line references\n\n**Stage 2 -- Code Quality** (template at `code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md`):\n- Only runs AFTER spec compliance passes (hard gate)\n- Delegates to `wz:code-reviewer` with SHA-scoped diff\n- Checks: single responsibility per file, unit decomposition, file structure alignment with plan, file size growth\n- Output: Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment\n\n**Key structural insight**: These two stages are sequential within the same tier. They separate \"did you build the right thing\" from \"did you build it well.\" The spec stage is a precondition for the quality stage -- there is no point reviewing code quality for code that doesn't match the spec.\n\n#### 1B. Google's Code Review Process\n\nGoogle requires three independent approvals before any change can be submitted, each checking a different concern:\n\n1. **LGTM (correctness)** -- Any peer engineer confirms the code is correct and does what the author claims. This is the closest analog to Wazir's Tier 1 internal review.\n\n2. **Code Owner approval (appropriateness)** -- Someone who owns that area of the codebase confirms the change belongs there and doesn't violate local conventions. This is a domain-specific check that no generic reviewer can perform.\n\n3. **Readability approval (style/idiom)** -- Someone certified in that language's readability confirms the code follows language-specific best practices. This is the concern that Wazir offloads to linters + expertise modules.\n\n**Key structural insight**: Google's system is multi-dimensional (not multi-tier). The three approvals check orthogonal concerns and can often be satisfied by one person wearing all three hats. The efficiency comes from the fact that in practice, most reviews are single-reviewer (one person grants all three), but structurally the system can demand separation when the change crosses ownership boundaries.\n\n**Relevance to Wazir**: Google's model suggests that dimension separation matters more than reviewer count. Wazir's two tiers should check genuinely different things, not re-run the same checklist with a different model.\n\n#### 1C. GitHub CODEOWNERS\n\nGitHub CODEOWNERS creates a file-path-to-reviewer mapping. When a PR touches files matching a pattern, the designated owners are automatically requested. Combined with branch protection rules (\"Require review from Code Owners\"), this creates an enforceable gate.\n\n**Key structural insight**: CODEOWNERS is a routing mechanism, not a review methodology. It answers \"who must review\" based on \"what was changed.\" It does not define what the reviewer should check.\n\n**Relevance to Wazir**: The analog is the `composition-map.yaml` -- which loads different expertise modules based on detected stack and concerns. Wazir's \"who reviews\" is solved by model selection (Sonnet vs Opus vs Codex); \"what expertise applies\" is solved by composition.\n\n#### 1D. CodeRabbit AI Review\n\nCodeRabbit implements a pre-human review layer:\n\n- **Workflow**: Code -> PR -> AI Review -> Human Review -> Merge\n- **AI role**: First-pass reviewer catching readability, maintainability, edge cases, best practices\n- **Human role**: Final 10% -- deeper architectural judgment, business logic validation\n- **Conflict resolution**: Human always wins. AI learns from dismissals and adapts via YAML config and feedback loop.\n- **Learning**: CodeRabbit stores which suggestions were accepted vs dismissed and adjusts future behavior.\n\n**Key structural insight**: CodeRabbit explicitly positions AI as pre-filter, human as final authority. The AI reduces cognitive load on the human reviewer; the human provides judgment the AI cannot. Disagreements are resolved by \"human wins, AI learns.\"\n\n**Relevance to Wazir**: This maps directly to Tier 1 (AI internal) as pre-filter and Tier 2 (Codex external) as fresh-eyes check. The learning pipeline (`state.sqlite` findings persistence) is Wazir's analog of CodeRabbit's feedback loop.\n\n---\n\n### 2. Wazir's Current Two-Tier Implementation\n\n#### What exists today (from `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`):\n\n**Tier 1: Internal Review (Fast, Cheap, Expertise-Loaded)**\n- Model: Sonnet (when multi-model enabled)\n- Expertise: Loads modules from `expertise/composition-map.yaml` based on review mode + detected stack\n- Always-on reviewer expertise: ai-coding-antipatterns, code-smells, code-review-antipatterns, dependency-antipatterns, architectural-thinking, coupling-and-cohesion, architecture-antipatterns, domain-driven-design\n- Auto-loaded for all stacks: vulnerability-patterns, secrets-antipatterns, performance-antipatterns, technical-debt-antipatterns\n- Stack-specific: per-stack antipatterns (e.g., react-antipatterns for React projects)\n- Concern-specific: loaded when declared (e.g., security-auth loads owasp-top-10 + secure-sdlc for reviewer role)\n- Dimensions: Selected by review mode (5 task-execution, 9 final, 5 spec, etc.)\n- Output: Findings tagged `[Internal]` with severity (blocking, warning, note)\n- Fix cycle: If blocking findings exist, executor fixes, internal re-runs, repeat until clean or cap\n\n**Tier 2: External Review (Fresh Eyes on Clean Code)**\n- Precondition: Tier 1 must produce a clean pass (no blocking findings) before Tier 2 runs\n- Model: Codex CLI with configurable model (default gpt-5.4), read from `.wazir/state/config.json`\n- For code: `codex review --uncommitted` or `--base <sha>`\n- For non-code artifacts: `cat <artifact> | codex exec` with dimension-specific prompt\n- Output: Findings tagged `[Codex]`\n- Context protection: Codex output is tee'd to file, then only final findings are extracted (traces stay in file)\n- Fix cycle: Codex blocking findings -> executor fixes -> internal re-run (regression check) -> optional Codex re-run\n\n**Finding Attribution**: Every finding is tagged `[Internal]`, `[Codex]`, `[Gemini]`, or `[Both]`.\n\n**Finding Persistence**: All findings from both tiers go to `state.sqlite` via `insertFinding()` with `source` field set to `'internal'`, `'codex'`, or `'gemini'`. The `getRecurringFindingHashes()` function identifies patterns that recur across runs.\n\n#### Model Routing (from `tooling/src/adapters/model-router.js`):\n\n| Task Type | Model | Reasoning |\n|-----------|-------|-----------|\n| `internal-review` | Sonnet | Pattern matching against expertise |\n| `task-review` | Sonnet | Diff review against clear spec |\n| `final-review` | Opus | Holistic judgment against original input |\n| `spec-harden` | Opus | Adversarial thinking required |\n\n---\n\n### 3. Architecture Analysis: What Each Tier Actually Does Differently\n\n#### Tier 1 (Internal / Sonnet) -- The Expertise-Loaded Pattern Matcher\n\n**What it checks**: Known patterns. The internal reviewer has the full expertise library loaded into context -- antipatterns, architecture principles, security checklists, stack-specific pitfalls. It is pattern matching: \"does this code exhibit any known antipattern from the loaded expertise modules?\"\n\n**Strengths**:\n- Fast (Sonnet is cheaper and faster)\n- Deep domain knowledge (expertise modules provide hundreds of specific patterns)\n- Consistent (same expertise library every time)\n- Good at: naming issues, error handling gaps, known security vulnerabilities, style violations, missing tests, architectural antipatterns\n\n**Weaknesses**:\n- Cannot see what it hasn't been told about (limited to loaded expertise)\n- Same model that may have been used for implementation (shared blind spots)\n- Pattern matching misses novel issues\n- Susceptible to the \"curse of expertise\" -- checks everything the library says but misses things the library doesn't cover\n\n**Effective dimensions**: Quality, Tests, Wiring, Drift (pattern-matchable against spec)\n\n#### Tier 2 (Codex / External) -- The Fresh-Eyes Outsider\n\n**What it checks**: What a smart engineer would notice reading the code cold, with no prior context about how it was built or what the expertise library says.\n\n**Strengths**:\n- Different model architecture (OpenAI vs Anthropic) -- genuinely different blind spots\n- No shared context with implementation -- cannot be \"anchored\" by the implementer's reasoning\n- Good at: logic errors, missing edge cases, integration issues, things that \"feel wrong\" but don't match a named antipattern\n- Reads the actual diff, not a summary -- catches things the internal reviewer might skim\n\n**Weaknesses**:\n- No expertise modules loaded (doesn't know your stack's specific pitfalls)\n- Slower, more expensive\n- May flag things the internal reviewer already checked and passed (noise)\n- Less consistent (different prompt, different model behavior)\n\n**Effective dimensions**: Correctness, Completeness, Intent Alignment, Scope Coverage (judgment-heavy, not pattern-matchable)\n\n#### The Critical Asymmetry\n\nTier 1 is a **known-unknowns detector** -- it checks for issues in a predefined catalogue. Tier 2 is an **unknown-unknowns detector** -- it reads with fresh eyes and catches things not in any catalogue. This is why Tier 1 runs first: clearing known issues means Tier 2 reviews clean code and can focus on novel concerns rather than wasting attention on things a linter could catch.\n\n---\n\n### 4. How Tier 1 Findings Feed Into Tier 2\n\n**Current mechanism**: Tier 1 findings are fixed before Tier 2 runs. Tier 2 never sees Tier 1's findings -- it sees the cleaned-up code. This is by design: Tier 2 reviews clean code, not a list of known issues.\n\n**What Tier 2 receives**:\n- The diff (committed or uncommitted changes)\n- Acceptance criteria from the spec\n- A dimension-specific prompt\n- No expertise modules, no Tier 1 findings, no implementation history\n\n**What Tier 2 does NOT receive**:\n- Tier 1's findings list\n- Expertise module content\n- Implementation context or reasoning\n\nThis is correct. Giving Tier 2 the Tier 1 findings would anchor it -- the fresh-eyes value comes precisely from not knowing what Tier 1 checked. This matches CodeRabbit's model (AI review is independent of human review) and Google's model (readability reviewer doesn't read the LGTM reviewer's comments before reviewing).\n\n---\n\n### 5. Conflict Resolution: When Tier 1 and Tier 2 Disagree\n\nThere are three disagreement scenarios:\n\n**Scenario A: Tier 1 passed, Tier 2 flags an issue.**\nThis is the normal case -- Tier 2's value is catching things Tier 1 missed. The finding is tagged `[Codex]` and treated as new. If blocking, the executor fixes and the fix goes through an internal regression check (Tier 1 re-runs to verify the fix didn't introduce new problems). This is already implemented in the \"Fix Cycle (Codex Findings)\" section of the reviewer skill.\n\n**Scenario B: Tier 1 flagged and fixed an issue, Tier 2 re-flags the same area.**\nThis means Tier 1's fix was insufficient or introduced a new problem. The finding is tagged `[Codex]`, and the fix cycle runs again. The `finding_hash` in `state.sqlite` distinguishes the original Tier 1 finding from the new Tier 2 finding (different description = different hash).\n\n**Scenario C: Tier 2 flags something the reviewer (the entity running both tiers) considers a false positive.**\nThe reviewer skill says: \"if you disagree with a Codex finding, note it with your rationale.\" This is the existing conflict resolution -- the internal reviewer (running the loop) is the arbiter. It can override a Codex finding by documenting rationale. This matches CodeRabbit's \"human wins, AI learns\" model. The finding is still persisted to `state.sqlite` with source `'codex'` -- if it recurs across multiple runs, the learning pipeline will surface it for user review.\n\n**Missing today**: There is no explicit protocol for the reverse -- Codex approving something that Tier 1 flagged. This doesn't arise in practice because Tier 1 findings must be fixed before Tier 2 runs. Tier 2 only reviews code that Tier 1 has already approved.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Security-Sensitive Review Escalation\n\nWhen `detectSecurityPatterns()` from `tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js` triggers on the diff (matches patterns like `auth`, `token`, `sql`, `secret`, `jwt`, etc.), 6 additional security dimensions are added to the standard review:\n\n1. Injection (SQL, command, template, header)\n2. Authentication bypass\n3. Data exposure (PII, secrets, tokens in logs/responses)\n4. CSRF / SSRF\n5. XSS (stored, reflected, DOM)\n6. Secrets leakage (hardcoded keys, env vars in client code)\n\nThese are checked by both tiers -- Tier 1 with security expertise modules loaded (from `concerns.security-*` in composition-map), Tier 2 by Codex with security-focused prompting.\n\n---\n\n### 7. Summary: The Architecture as It Stands\n\n```\nCode Change\n  |\n  v\nTier 1: Internal Review (Sonnet, expertise-loaded)\n  - Loads expertise modules from composition-map.yaml\n  - Checks phase-specific dimensions (5 for task, 9 for final, etc.)\n  - Adds 6 security dims if security patterns detected\n  - Fix cycle: blocking findings -> executor fixes -> re-review\n  - Output: findings tagged [Internal]\n  |\n  | (only after Tier 1 is clean -- no blocking findings)\n  v\nTier 2: External Review (Codex, fresh eyes)\n  - No expertise modules, no Tier 1 context\n  - Reviews clean code against acceptance criteria\n  - Output: findings tagged [Codex]\n  - Conflict: reviewer arbitrates, documents rationale\n  |\n  v\nMerged Findings\n  - All findings persisted to state.sqlite with source attribution\n  - finding_hash enables cross-run recurrence detection\n  - Recurring findings -> learning candidates -> user-approved learnings\n  - Learnings injected into future executor context (prevention > detection)\n```\n\n**Model selection rationale**: Sonnet for Tier 1 because it's pattern matching against loaded expertise (comprehension task). Opus for Tier 2 is NOT used -- Codex (OpenAI, different model family entirely) provides the cross-vendor diversity that makes fresh-eyes review meaningful. If Tier 2 used another Anthropic model, the value of \"different blind spots\" would be diminished.\n\n**Dimension sets are identical across tiers for the same review mode.** The difference is not what they check but how: Tier 1 checks with expertise context, Tier 2 checks without it.\n\n---\n\n### Key Files Referenced\n\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md` -- Two-tier review flow, dimensions, finding attribution\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md` -- Two-stage (spec then quality) review within execution\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md` -- Spec compliance reviewer template\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` -- Code quality reviewer template\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` -- Canonical review loop, dimension sets, Codex integration protocol\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/composition-map.yaml` -- Expertise module resolution per role/stack/concern\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/adapters/model-router.js` -- Model routing table (Haiku/Sonnet/Opus)\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/checks/security-sensitivity.js` -- Security pattern detection + 6 security dimensions\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/state/db.js` -- Finding persistence with source attribution + recurrence detection\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md` -- How review is requested with SHA scoping\n- `/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/codex-cli/SKILL.md` -- Codex CLI integration reference\n\n### Sources (External)\n\n- [Code Review - Software Engineering at Google](https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book/html/ch09.html)\n- [How Google does code review](https://graphite.com/blog/how-google-does-code-review)\n- [How Google takes the pain out of code reviews](https://read.engineerscodex.com/p/how-google-takes-the-pain-out-of)\n- [About code owners - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/articles/about-code-owners)\n- [About protected branches - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches)\n- [CodeRabbit AI Code Reviews](https://www.coderabbit.ai/)\n- [AI Code Review with CodeRabbit (Medium)](https://medium.com/manomano-tech/ai-code-review-with-coderabbit-ed6ed610f481)\n- [Improving Code Reviews with AI - Flowing Code](https://www.flowingcode.com/en/improving-code-reviews-with-ai-our-experience-with-coderabbit/)"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":852,"cache_read_input_tokens":64074,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":852,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERm6ifGtrdMN9X27m3E","type":"assistant","uuid":"ea0b21c5-9f2f-40b2-af43-9f8f6d061cd5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:42:58.177Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}