@wazir-dev/cli 1.2.0 → 1.4.0

package/docs/research/2026-03-20-agents/a927659a942ee7f60.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+{"parentUuid":null,"isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":"Research ONLY — no code. How do systems close the loop from review findings to improved future performance?\n\nResearch:\n1. Amazon CodeGuru — how do ML-detected patterns improve over time from reviewer feedback?\n2. LangMem prompt optimization — how do review results optimize future prompts?\n3. Superpowers writing-skills TDD — how do observed rationalizations become skill content?\n4. Netflix learning from incidents — how do postmortems become prevention rules?\n\nFor Wazir: the complete feedback loop is:\n1. Review finding: \"missing error handling in async code\"\n2. Finding logged to cumulative-findings.md\n3. Same finding recurs 3+ times\n4. Promoted to antipattern: AP-XX \"Async error handling omission\"\n5. Antipattern loaded into reviewer context\n6. Reviewer catches it earlier in next run\n7. Finding stops recurring → learning validated\n\nResearch: what's the minimum viable version of this loop? Can we ship step 1-4 without the full system?\n\nOutput: Minimum viable feedback-to-learning pipeline with concrete implementation steps."},"uuid":"6861d649-1673-415a-a5e5-6e2d379ecc90","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:01.359Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6861d649-1673-415a-a5e5-6e2d379ecc90","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Psjgn8eq8ShZZafzUBkZho","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI'll research each system's approach to closing the feedback-to-learning loop, then synthesize a minimum viable pipeline for Wazir."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2688,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2688,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKfZdi4jsK1zet79J3","type":"assistant","uuid":"83208316-c363-4c47-9355-bf6afd7bad98","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.765Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"83208316-c363-4c47-9355-bf6afd7bad98","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Psjgn8eq8ShZZafzUBkZho","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01HXBwGesqYKyu5NuMQjf8pH","name":"ToolSearch","input":{"query":"WebSearch","max_results":1},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2688,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"output_tokens":105,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2688},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERKfZdi4jsK1zet79J3","type":"assistant","uuid":"7054f35a-a00d-453e-8007-62633395cfc4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.888Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7054f35a-a00d-453e-8007-62633395cfc4","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","tool_use_id":"toolu_01HXBwGesqYKyu5NuMQjf8pH","content":[{"type":"tool_reference","tool_name":"WebSearch"}]}]},"uuid":"f09c85e0-6219-448d-bdc1-166ff8d3ab80","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:23.889Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"7054f35a-a00d-453e-8007-62633395cfc4","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f09c85e0-6219-448d-bdc1-166ff8d3ab80","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01TfJedNQGHkRhZ6jXs8QhkE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me research all four systems in parallel."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":635,"cache_read_input_tokens":10433,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":635,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERLWum227B3oXAB1VnL","type":"assistant","uuid":"e6370071-ee2a-4052-923b-5ea725d4bcf3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:33.931Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e6370071-ee2a-4052-923b-5ea725d4bcf3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01TfJedNQGHkRhZ6jXs8QhkE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01GeFV3DPw5Fbitz3gbxNFP1","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer ML feedback loop how patterns improve from developer feedback"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":635,"cache_read_input_tokens":10433,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":635,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERLWum227B3oXAB1VnL","type":"assistant","uuid":"16639964-418e-46a6-b052-d4fb8d1afedf","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:34.962Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"16639964-418e-46a6-b052-d4fb8d1afedf","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01TfJedNQGHkRhZ6jXs8QhkE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01FHEzMGtcRtRYy5S7nzg1F9","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangMem prompt optimization review results feedback loop learning from corrections"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":635,"cache_read_input_tokens":10433,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":635,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERLWum227B3oXAB1VnL","type":"assistant","uuid":"8b6bfe21-a4af-4fa2-afb9-a973dc3cae2b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:35.620Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8b6bfe21-a4af-4fa2-afb9-a973dc3cae2b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01TfJedNQGHkRhZ6jXs8QhkE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01GUCoxZd7SFQd4qiexJQ21X","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Superpowers AI writing skills TDD rationalization observed patterns become skill content"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":635,"cache_read_input_tokens":10433,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":635,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERLWum227B3oXAB1VnL","type":"assistant","uuid":"f830d9ae-9262-46eb-965d-53c8b526a8c0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:36.367Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f830d9ae-9262-46eb-965d-53c8b526a8c0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01TfJedNQGHkRhZ6jXs8QhkE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01WDc5bzdDmD1QMNyk5DKdd2","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Netflix learning from incidents postmortem prevention rules automated feedback loop"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":635,"cache_read_input_tokens":10433,"output_tokens":219,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":635},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERLWum227B3oXAB1VnL","type":"assistant","uuid":"f64235ff-ce77-4ee7-8805-d6602f103338","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:36.727Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f64235ff-ce77-4ee7-8805-d6602f103338","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer ML feedback loop developer patterns improve"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GeFV3DPw5Fbitz3gbxNFP1","uuid":"6104d059-763d-465e-98a6-0e80a5a367b3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:37.998Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6104d059-763d-465e-98a6-0e80a5a367b3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Netflix learning from incidents postmortem prevention rules automated feedback loop"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WDc5bzdDmD1QMNyk5DKdd2","uuid":"6b2b6ad8-c9eb-438c-a84d-402852226552","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:39.174Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6b2b6ad8-c9eb-438c-a84d-402852226552","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer ML feedback loop developer patterns improve"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_017EXnuD8AZvhWwwbbedVzCZ","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GeFV3DPw5Fbitz3gbxNFP1","uuid":"25b6d5c3-c2c7-4d49-9570-6e73fe6f8665","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:39.519Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"25b6d5c3-c2c7-4d49-9570-6e73fe6f8665","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Netflix learning from incidents postmortem prevention rules automated feedback loop"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01LHK21m34RsNorsRZxoxNBk","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WDc5bzdDmD1QMNyk5DKdd2","uuid":"6dc51d43-f35e-406c-9967-bb7075e2b930","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:41.323Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6dc51d43-f35e-406c-9967-bb7075e2b930","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangMem prompt optimization review results feedback loop"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01FHEzMGtcRtRYy5S7nzg1F9","uuid":"9e05b548-eb94-4c41-8b09-fe6c610b448b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:43.387Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"16639964-418e-46a6-b052-d4fb8d1afedf","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01GeFV3DPw5Fbitz3gbxNFP1","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer ML feedback loop how patterns improve from developer feedback\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer FAQs – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/faqs/\"},{\"title\":\"Optimize Code Performance – Amazon CodeGuru Profiler FAQs – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/profiler/faqs/\"},{\"title\":\"Automate Your Code Quality: Integrating Amazon CodeGuru into CI/CD for Smarter Reviews - Next World\",\"url\":\"https://www.nextworldpro.com/2026/02/automate-your-code-quality-integrating.html\"},{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Features – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/features/\"},{\"title\":\"Optimize Your Code with Amazon CodeGuru\",\"url\":\"https://k21academy.com/aws-cloud/amazon-codeguru/\"},{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Customers – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/customers/\"},{\"title\":\"Amazon CodeGuru: The Key to Optimizing Software Development\",\"url\":\"https://cloudvisor.co/aws-guides/amazon-codeguru/\"},{\"title\":\"Optimize Code Performance – Amazon CodeGuru Profiler Customers – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/profiler/customers/\"},{\"title\":\"Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Developer Resources\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/resources/\"},{\"title\":\"AI Code Review Tools: Smarter, Faster, and Production‑Ready | Nerd Level Tech\",\"url\":\"https://nerdleveltech.com/ai-code-review-tools-smarter-faster-and-productionready\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer's ML feedback loop and how patterns improve from developer feedback:\n\n## ML Feedback Loop and Pattern Improvement\n\nFor both rule-based and machine learning-based models, Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer uses the feedback you provide as labels and iteratively improves the quality of code detectors. This means that when developers interact with recommendations—accepting or rejecting them—that data becomes training material for the models.\n\nModern tools continuously learn from developer feedback — when developers accept or reject suggestions, that data refines future recommendations. This creates a continuous cycle where each piece of developer feedback helps the system become more accurate over time.\n\n## How Pattern Analysis Works\n\nAfter a customer triggers a review, these models utilize a number of data mining and machine learning techniques to build the dataset, highlight the reason for the code patterns, and make recommendations customized to the customer's code. The system analyzes coding patterns within repositories and can detect anomalies that deviate from established standards.\n\n## Real-World Impact\n\nThe feedback loop has practical benefits for development teams. Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer has helped create a feedback loop for developers and improved the overall quality of their code. Additionally, by consistently providing recommendations and feedback, it helps new developers understand better practices and seasoned developers to stay sharp, which enhances overall team expertise and code quality.\n\nThis iterative improvement mechanism allows CodeGuru to become increasingly tailored to individual teams' coding standards and practices over time.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"9519b798-c11f-47d1-9e10-2d8b30ea06cc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:44.188Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"16639964-418e-46a6-b052-d4fb8d1afedf","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9519b798-c11f-47d1-9e10-2d8b30ea06cc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangMem prompt optimization review results feedback loop"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_015zH7koLPLkiqbCoGCDqUwL","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01FHEzMGtcRtRYy5S7nzg1F9","uuid":"8201aa37-eaf3-43f3-b14c-6e09232dbc45","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:45.266Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8201aa37-eaf3-43f3-b14c-6e09232dbc45","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Superpowers AI writing skills TDD rationalization observed patterns become skill content"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GUCoxZd7SFQd4qiexJQ21X","uuid":"da19f264-027e-45bd-8da7-fe32546f85b9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:45.769Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f64235ff-ce77-4ee7-8805-d6602f103338","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01WDc5bzdDmD1QMNyk5DKdd2","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Netflix learning from incidents postmortem prevention rules automated feedback loop\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"How engineers at Netflix and PagerDuty outsmart incidents with Slack | Slack\",\"url\":\"https://slack.com/blog/collaboration/engineers-netflix-pagerduty-slack\"},{\"title\":\"Netflix releases open-source crisis-management tool [LWN.net]\",\"url\":\"https://lwn.net/Articles/824739/\"},{\"title\":\"Ryan Kitchens on Learning from Incidents at Netflix, the Role of SRE, and Sociotechnical Systems - InfoQ\",\"url\":\"https://www.infoq.com/podcasts/netflix-sre-sociotechnical-systems/\"},{\"title\":\"Empowering Netflix Engineers with Incident Management | by Netflix Technology Blog | Netflix TechBlog\",\"url\":\"https://netflixtechblog.com/empowering-netflix-engineers-with-incident-management-ebb967871de4\"},{\"title\":\"6 Lessons Learned from Netflix's New Year's Eve Outage - The New Stack\",\"url\":\"https://thenewstack.io/6-lessons-learned-from-netflixs-new-years-eve-outage/\"},{\"title\":\"SRE Postmortem Best Practices: What Google, Netflix, and Amazon Actually Do | by Code blows | Let’s Code Future | Mar, 2026 | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/lets-code-future/sre-postmortem-best-practices-what-google-netflix-and-amazon-actually-do-638797cdd445\"},{\"title\":\"How to implement a Blameless Postmortem (part two) · Raygun Blog\",\"url\":\"https://raygun.com/blog/blameless-postmortems-part-two/\"},{\"title\":\"Rootly Guide | Incident-post-mortems - How to Run Effective Blameless Postmortems\",\"url\":\"https://rootly.com/incident-postmortems/blameless\"},{\"title\":\"Real-World Incident Postmortem Examples - Learning from Failure in SRE for Better Reliability\",\"url\":\"https://moldstud.com/articles/p-real-world-incident-postmortem-examples-learning-from-failure-in-sre-for-better-reliability\"},{\"title\":\"Incident Response Automation @ Netflix Q12019 | PPT\",\"url\":\"https://www.slideshare.net/MarcVilanova1/incident-response-automation-netflix-q12019\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about Netflix's approach to learning from incidents, postmortems, prevention rules, and automated feedback loops:\n\n## Netflix's Incident Learning Framework\n\nNetflix's Dispatch tool focuses on four key areas: resource management, individual engagement, incident life-cycle, and \"incident learning\" — the ability to build off past incidents to inform future ones.\n\n### Postmortem & Learning Process\n\nOnce an incident has been resolved, the collection of information is retained for post-mortem analysis or to reference in future incidents. The approach enables teams to gain insight with every incident—learning to solve future issues faster and get ahead of others before they even begin.\n\n### Prevention Rules and Automation\n\nWorkflows defined in Dispatch, triggered when an incident is reported, can automatically do things such as create Slack rooms for relevant personnel and GSuite documents so that participants can begin coordinated work toward a solution. Netflix-specific contextualization enables powerful automations, such as automatically looping in the right teams or pre-filling incident fields from alerts.\n\n### Automated Feedback Loop\n\nNetflix ensures that support staff within an organisation have a feedback loop into the product team, as these people providing support often know where all of the hidden problems are, the nuances of the systems, and the workarounds. Additionally, integrations with internal data across multiple incidents enable Netflix to identify and address systemic issues.\n\nThe search results show that Netflix emphasizes connecting incident learnings across the organization to prevent recurring problems and continuously improve system reliability.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"78fe0af3-d3c8-45c1-90dc-5ff7821ce15a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:46.795Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f64235ff-ce77-4ee7-8805-d6602f103338","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"78fe0af3-d3c8-45c1-90dc-5ff7821ce15a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Superpowers AI writing skills TDD rationalization observed patterns become skill content"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01M9eUiETLtanNAQ5cp7YMKy","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GUCoxZd7SFQd4qiexJQ21X","uuid":"95caac2f-e04b-406a-ab2a-3b2d7efbaa10","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:47.100Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8b6bfe21-a4af-4fa2-afb9-a973dc3cae2b","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01FHEzMGtcRtRYy5S7nzg1F9","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangMem prompt optimization review results feedback loop learning from corrections\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Exploring Prompt Optimization\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/exploring-prompt-optimization/\"},{\"title\":\"Prompt Optimization API Reference\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/reference/prompt_optimization/\"},{\"title\":\"Promptim: an experimental library for prompt optimization\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/promptim/\"},{\"title\":\"Prompt Learning: Using English Feedback to Optimize LLM Systems - Arize AI\",\"url\":\"https://arize.com/blog/prompt-learning-using-english-feedback-to-optimize-llm-systems/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize Prompting for Large Language Models in Clinical Research - PMC\",\"url\":\"https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11444847/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize a Prompt\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_memory_prompt/\"},{\"title\":\"Prompt Engineering Techniques for LLM Optimization | by Pranav Masariya | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@iammasariya/prompt-engineering-techniques-for-llm-optimization-5245a45155d2\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize Multiple Prompts\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_compound_system/\"},{\"title\":\"Exploring Prompt Learning: Using English Feedback to Optimize LLM Systems | Towards Data Science\",\"url\":\"https://towardsdatascience.com/exploring-prompt-learning-using-english-feedback-to-optimize-llm-systems/\"},{\"title\":\"LangMem SDK for agent long-term memory\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/langmem-sdk-launch/\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about LangMem prompt optimization with review results, feedback loops, and learning from corrections:\n\n## LangMem Prompt Optimization Overview\n\nLangMem provides multiple algorithms for generating prompt update proposals, including metaprompt approaches, and helps agents learn and improve through long-term memory by extracting information from conversations, optimizing agent behavior through prompt updates, and maintaining long-term memory about behaviors, facts, and events.\n\n## Feedback Loop and Learning Process\n\nThe system creates a feedback loop where the agent's core instructions evolve based on observed performance. LangMem updates system prompts based on conversation logs or agent trajectories by feeding past conversations and feedback into an optimizer to fix common issues like missed requirements or poor response structure.\n\n## Optimization Strategies\n\nLangMem supports multiple optimization approaches:\n\n1. **Gradient Optimizer**: The \"gradient\" optimizer divides work between two LLM calls: one to propose improvements and one to apply them to the actual prompt, with 2-10 total LLM calls.\n\n2. **Prompt Memory Optimizer**: The \"prompt_memory\" optimizer calls an LLM with a simple metaprompt to infer updates in a single step.\n\n3. **Multi-Prompt Optimization**: The system can optimize multiple prompts in a system based on conversation logs and feedback, inferring \"gradients\" or recommended changes to the system output based on trajectories and optional feedback.\n\n## Learning from Corrections\n\nUsing an LLM to generate specific feedback for each example where the prompt failed (called \"gradients\"), then proposing prompt updates based on these collected gradients, ensures that collecting fine-grained feedback before making changes leads to more targeted improvements.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"9f0b438f-db85-4f78-ab72-12950388318d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:51.114Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"8b6bfe21-a4af-4fa2-afb9-a973dc3cae2b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f830d9ae-9262-46eb-965d-53c8b526a8c0","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01GUCoxZd7SFQd4qiexJQ21X","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Superpowers AI writing skills TDD rationalization observed patterns become skill content\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"superpowers/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md at main · obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md\"},{\"title\":\"writing-skills by obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://skills.sh/obra/superpowers/writing-skills\"},{\"title\":\"superpowers-writing-skills - Skill | Smithery\",\"url\":\"https://smithery.ai/skills/abhinav/superpowers-writing-skills\"},{\"title\":\"superpowers/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md at main · obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md\"},{\"title\":\"obra/superpowers-skills | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/obra/superpowers-skills\"},{\"title\":\"Capability Documentation | AI Agent Skills\",\"url\":\"https://aiagents.wiki/agents/capability-documentation\"},{\"title\":\"How to Write Custom Superpowers Skills | BSWEN\",\"url\":\"https://docs.bswen.com/blog/2026-03-18-writing-skills/\"},{\"title\":\"writing-skills - Claude Skills\",\"url\":\"https://claude-plugins.dev/skills/@obra/superpowers/writing-skills\"},{\"title\":\"Superpowers: The Technology to \\\"Persuade\\\" AI Agents—Why Psychological Principles Change Code Quality - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/tumf/superpowers-the-technology-to-persuade-ai-agents-why-psychological-principles-change-code-quality-2d2f\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - obra/superpowers: An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers\"}]\n\nI found comprehensive information about Superpowers AI writing skills and how TDD (Test-Driven Development) rationalization works. Here's what the search revealed:\n\n## Overview\n\nSuperpowers is an agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works. Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation. This is the core idea.\n\n## How Observed Patterns Become Skill Content\n\nThe framework uses a specific methodology for converting observed agent behavior into formal skills:\n\n**The Testing Cycle:**\n\nYou must see what agents naturally do before writing the skill. Write skill that addresses those specific rationalizations. Don't add extra content for hypothetical cases. This follows the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR pattern:\n\n- **RED Phase**: Without the TDD skill, it immediately wrote production code. When reminded to write tests, it said: \"I'll add them after—it's the same result.\" That rationalization became the basis for the skill's counter-argument table.\n\n- **GREEN Phase**: Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply. Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter.\n\n## Addressing Rationalization\n\nSkills that enforce discipline (like TDD) need to resist rationalization. Agents are smart and will find loopholes when under pressure. The framework counters this by forbid specific workarounds: Write code before test? Delete it. Write code before test? Delete it. Start over.\n\nIf you didn't watch an agent fail without the skill, you don't know if the skill teaches the right thing.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"c25affb4-94f8-4a2d-994d-514b4198bebb","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:52.819Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f830d9ae-9262-46eb-965d-53c8b526a8c0","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c25affb4-94f8-4a2d-994d-514b4198bebb","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01B4w3XYpC43xWxZ9h2TsWo2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Let me get deeper detail on the specific mechanisms."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":971,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2776,"cache_read_input_tokens":11068,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2776,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQxffWR6CzjAHZZD6T","type":"assistant","uuid":"3eed3146-3d8b-4505-82ca-bc8ea512b537","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:34.251Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3eed3146-3d8b-4505-82ca-bc8ea512b537","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01B4w3XYpC43xWxZ9h2TsWo2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_018ib92JbP8x8GVb2vmV7Xa8","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer thumbs up thumbs down feedback training data recommendation suppression mechanism"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":971,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2776,"cache_read_input_tokens":11068,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2776,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQxffWR6CzjAHZZD6T","type":"assistant","uuid":"007141cc-16ee-41c4-a8e9-1fe95355652e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:35.164Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"007141cc-16ee-41c4-a8e9-1fe95355652e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01B4w3XYpC43xWxZ9h2TsWo2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01BDAzyQz5qisraMg2wHjaPC","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangMem \"prompt_memory\" optimizer trajectory feedback gradient update how it works implementation"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":971,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2776,"cache_read_input_tokens":11068,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2776,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQxffWR6CzjAHZZD6T","type":"assistant","uuid":"7a6220de-2216-4aba-9a7d-21cbf5f5c31e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:35.588Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7a6220de-2216-4aba-9a7d-21cbf5f5c31e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01B4w3XYpC43xWxZ9h2TsWo2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012cazvL14r8BLPRt4VtEVRZ","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"obra superpowers skills \"rationalization table\" \"counter-argument\" observed failure pattern skill content TDD"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":971,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2776,"cache_read_input_tokens":11068,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2776,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQxffWR6CzjAHZZD6T","type":"assistant","uuid":"43bd7dde-77b4-4a66-aa8f-61740e490227","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:36.476Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"43bd7dde-77b4-4a66-aa8f-61740e490227","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01B4w3XYpC43xWxZ9h2TsWo2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01X77EV27kmqLkqVG9sELpvb","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Netflix Dispatch \"incident learning\" postmortem action items tracking automated prevention systemic patterns"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":971,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2776,"cache_read_input_tokens":11068,"output_tokens":240,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2776},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERQxffWR6CzjAHZZD6T","type":"assistant","uuid":"cccec0ca-85b9-42a8-9f3a-41f0d315a85f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:37.192Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cccec0ca-85b9-42a8-9f3a-41f0d315a85f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"obra superpowers skills rationalization table counter-argument"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_012cazvL14r8BLPRt4VtEVRZ","uuid":"0c2170af-eedd-49d1-815e-c3adf7a7fb89","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:39.159Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0c2170af-eedd-49d1-815e-c3adf7a7fb89","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangMem prompt_memory optimizer trajectory feedback gradient"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BDAzyQz5qisraMg2wHjaPC","uuid":"cc48df13-cd9a-4fdd-a23e-41aab40cc549","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:40.123Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cc48df13-cd9a-4fdd-a23e-41aab40cc549","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Netflix Dispatch incident learning postmortem action items"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X77EV27kmqLkqVG9sELpvb","uuid":"ac805d3a-9a9e-4adc-8b2e-71e584bf38c5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:40.209Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ac805d3a-9a9e-4adc-8b2e-71e584bf38c5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"obra superpowers skills rationalization table counter-argument"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01MDNNBuXREYHgL5gpRM2bRr","parentToolUseID":"toolu_012cazvL14r8BLPRt4VtEVRZ","uuid":"bf327ff0-bfea-4e80-bdb5-a3fd8b308f7e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:40.652Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bf327ff0-bfea-4e80-bdb5-a3fd8b308f7e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Netflix Dispatch incident learning postmortem action items"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_012LwB57qvC9KyM4mexBZZYX","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01X77EV27kmqLkqVG9sELpvb","uuid":"4db9f06b-fef4-4122-ab6e-7806c3be0b6b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:41.763Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4db9f06b-fef4-4122-ab6e-7806c3be0b6b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangMem prompt_memory optimizer trajectory feedback gradient"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_013CE2nYywUpD3wfoYXZMpqR","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BDAzyQz5qisraMg2wHjaPC","uuid":"278c6cf5-12d7-4ef1-bd2c-f554985fd39c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:42.308Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"43bd7dde-77b4-4a66-aa8f-61740e490227","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_012cazvL14r8BLPRt4VtEVRZ","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"obra superpowers skills \"rationalization table\" \"counter-argument\" observed failure pattern skill content TDD\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"superpowers/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md at main · obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md\"},{\"title\":\"writing-skills by obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://skills.sh/obra/superpowers/writing-skills\"},{\"title\":\"superpowers/RELEASE-NOTES.md at main · obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/RELEASE-NOTES.md\"},{\"title\":\"What Are Skills | obra/superpowers | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/obra/superpowers/3.1-what-are-skills\"},{\"title\":\"using-superpowers (Meta-Skill) | obra/superpowers | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/obra/superpowers/7.1-using-superpowers\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - obra/superpowers: An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers\"},{\"title\":\"Key Skills Reference | obra/superpowers | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/obra/superpowers/7-key-skills-reference\"},{\"title\":\"test-driven-development by obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://skills.sh/obra/superpowers/test-driven-development\"},{\"title\":\"using-superpowers by obra/superpowers - Skills.sh\",\"url\":\"https://skills.sh/obra/superpowers/using-superpowers\"},{\"title\":\"superpowers-skills/skills/using-skills/SKILL.md at main · obra/superpowers-skills\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers-skills/blob/main/skills/using-skills/SKILL.md\"}]\n\nI've completed a web search for your query. Here are the key findings from the obra/superpowers project:\n\n## Overview\n\nSuperpowers is a complete software development workflow for coding agents, built on a set of composable \"skills\".\n\n## Rationalization Tables and Counter-Arguments\n\nThe system captures rationalizations from baseline testing in a table format with excuses and reality rebuttals, such as mapping \"Too simple to test\" to \"Simple code breaks. Test takes 30 seconds,\" and \"I'll test after\" to \"Tests passing immediately prove nothing\".\n\nRationalizations are captured from baseline testing, and when an agent finds a new rationalization, an explicit counter must be added and re-testing continues until bulletproof.\n\n## Observed Failure Patterns and TDD\n\nChanges address observed agent behavior where they rationalize around skill usage despite clear instructions, with forceful language and pre-emptive counter-arguments aimed at making non-compliance harder. Skills that enforce discipline (like TDD) need to resist rationalization.\n\nCreating skills follows TDD for process documentation with the same cycle: RED (baseline) → GREEN (write skill) → REFACTOR (close loopholes), with the same benefits: better quality, fewer surprises, bulletproof results.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"48b9c0e0-fa65-4463-8f45-b7e4def0c971","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:45.990Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"43bd7dde-77b4-4a66-aa8f-61740e490227","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cccec0ca-85b9-42a8-9f3a-41f0d315a85f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01X77EV27kmqLkqVG9sELpvb","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Netflix Dispatch \"incident learning\" postmortem action items tracking automated prevention systemic patterns\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Introducing Dispatch\",\"url\":\"https://netflixtechblog.com/introducing-dispatch-da4b8a2a8072\"},{\"title\":\"Netflix releases open-source crisis-management tool [LWN.net]\",\"url\":\"https://lwn.net/Articles/824739/\"},{\"title\":\"How engineers at Netflix and PagerDuty outsmart incidents with Slack | Slack\",\"url\":\"https://slack.com/blog/collaboration/engineers-netflix-pagerduty-slack\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - Netflix/dispatch: All of the ad-hoc things you're doing to manage incidents today, done for you, and much more! · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/Netflix/dispatch\"},{\"title\":\"Hello from Dispatch - Documentation | Dispatch - Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://netflix.github.io/dispatch/\"},{\"title\":\"Netflix Open Sources Crisis Management Orchestration Tool - InfoQ\",\"url\":\"https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/03/netflix-open-source-dispatch/\"},{\"title\":\"Dispatch – Open-source release of Netflix's crisis management framework | Hacker News\",\"url\":\"https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22405961\"},{\"title\":\"40 SPRING 2017 VOL. 42, NO. 1 www.usenix.org SYSADMIN Postmortem Action Items\",\"url\":\"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login_spring17_09_lunney.pdf\"},{\"title\":\"Ensures new incident roles match all priorities by kevgliss · Pull Request #1616 · Netflix/dispatch\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/Netflix/dispatch/pull/1616\"},{\"title\":\"With incident.io, Netflix has the incident management platform—and partner—it's always needed | incident.io\",\"url\":\"https://incident.io/customers/netflix\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I found comprehensive information about Netflix's Dispatch incident management system and its approach to incident learning. Here are the key findings:\n\n## Netflix Dispatch Overview\n\nNetflix released Dispatch as an open-source crisis management orchestration framework, designed to streamline incident response processes.\n\n## Incident Learning and Postmortem Capabilities\n\nDispatch focuses on four areas including \"incident learning\" — the ability to build off past incidents to inform future ones. More specifically, Dispatch performs Post Incident Review (PIR) by reviewing how the incident process was performed, tracking actions to be performed after the incident, and driving learning through structuring informal knowledge.\n\n## Postmortem and Action Items Tracking\n\nAutomatically creating postmortems and importing relevant data into the template makes them far more likely to actually get written, which in turn makes it easier for the organization to create and track action items, and to prioritize them.\n\n## Integration and Automation\n\nDispatch assists with creating resources, assembling participants, sending out notifications, tracking tasks, and assisting with post-incident reviews. Dispatch deeply integrates with existing tools used throughout an organization (Slack, GSuite, Jira, etc.).\n\nThe search results indicate that Dispatch provides systematic approaches to incident learning and pattern identification through automated postmortems and action item tracking, enabling organizations to learn from past incidents to prevent future ones.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"b872d3eb-45a0-4327-8f9a-8b792a56b5f4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:46.327Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"cccec0ca-85b9-42a8-9f3a-41f0d315a85f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7a6220de-2216-4aba-9a7d-21cbf5f5c31e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01BDAzyQz5qisraMg2wHjaPC","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangMem \"prompt_memory\" optimizer trajectory feedback gradient update how it works implementation\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"How to Optimize a Prompt\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_memory_prompt/\"},{\"title\":\"Prompt Optimization API Reference\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/reference/prompt_optimization/\"},{\"title\":\"LangMem SDK for agent long-term memory\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/langmem-sdk-launch/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize Multiple Prompts\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_compound_system/\"},{\"title\":\"Long-Term Memory in AI Agents: A Structured Approach with LangMem | by Plaban Nayak | The AI Forum | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/the-ai-forum/long-term-memory-in-ai-agents-a-structured-approach-with-langmem-12fe9c94a5c4\"},{\"title\":\"Revolutionizing AI Agents: LangMem Long Term Memory | by Advait Shinde | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@advaitss11/revolutionizing-ai-agents-langmem-long-term-memory-604611922ccf\"},{\"title\":\"How LangMem and Prompt Optimization Are Revolutionizing GenAI Agents | by Akshay Kumar | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@akshayajk22/how-langmem-and-prompt-optimization-are-revolutionizing-genai-agents-0888fd74fde3\"},{\"title\":\"[2402.17564] Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models as Prompt Optimizers: Analogical Analysis with Gradient-based Model Optimizers\",\"url\":\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17564\"},{\"title\":\"LangMem: A Framework for Building Long Term Memory in Agent-Based Systems | by Janani Seshadri | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/@janani.seshadri/building-persistent-memory-in-agent-systems-with-langmem-0059c439e5ea\"},{\"title\":\"Exploring Prompt Optimization\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/exploring-prompt-optimization/\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's comprehensive information about LangMem's `prompt_memory` optimizer:\n\n## Overview\n\nThe `prompt_memory` optimizer uses just 1 LLM call, making it the fastest optimization strategy available in LangMem's prompt optimization toolkit.\n\n## How It Works\n\nThe prompt memory optimizer learns from conversation history by extracting successful patterns from past interactions. Unlike more complex approaches, it operates as a lightweight, single-pass optimization mechanism.\n\n## Key Characteristics\n\n**Performance:**\nThe `prompt_memory` kind requires only 1 LLM call total, making it the fastest option compared to alternatives.\n\n**Comparison with Other Strategies:**\n- The gradient optimization approach uses 2-10 LLM calls with each step requiring 2 calls (think + critique)\n- The metaprompt optimization requires 1-5 LLM calls with each step being one call\n\n## Implementation Example\n\nTo use the prompt_memory optimizer: `optimizer = create_prompt_optimizer(\"anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest\", kind=\"prompt_memory\")`\n\n## Trajectory and Feedback\n\nThe optimizer works by feeding past conversations and feedback into the system to fix common issues like missed requirements or poor response structure. The prompt optimizer uses feedback to refine how the agent should behave in future interactions.\n\n## Use Cases\n\nThis optimizer is ideal when you need fast, efficient prompt refinement without the overhead of more complex gradient-based or meta-prompting approaches, especially useful for rapid iteration and real-time optimization scenarios.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"1f83965c-91e8-4e4e-8c67-e4118fa44063","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:48.813Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"7a6220de-2216-4aba-9a7d-21cbf5f5c31e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1f83965c-91e8-4e4e-8c67-e4118fa44063","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer feedback training data recommendation"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_018ib92JbP8x8GVb2vmV7Xa8","uuid":"26c7723f-c796-40f8-973c-803b41dd5c19","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:54.574Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"26c7723f-c796-40f8-973c-803b41dd5c19","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer feedback training data recommendation"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01TgMa5X5fFSRY1owCXYMsmy","parentToolUseID":"toolu_018ib92JbP8x8GVb2vmV7Xa8","uuid":"94ca9a66-9667-474d-9985-8282805d8001","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:56.624Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"007141cc-16ee-41c4-a8e9-1fe95355652e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_018ib92JbP8x8GVb2vmV7Xa8","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Amazon CodeGuru reviewer thumbs up thumbs down feedback training data recommendation suppression mechanism\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer FAQs – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/faqs/\"},{\"title\":\"Step 4: Provide feedback - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-ug/provide-feedback.html\"},{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Features – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/features/\"},{\"title\":\"ListRecommendationFeedback - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-api/API_ListRecommendationFeedback.html\"},{\"title\":\"Automate Code Reviews – Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer – Amazon Web Services\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/\"},{\"title\":\"DescribeRecommendationFeedback - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-api/API_DescribeRecommendationFeedback.html\"},{\"title\":\"RecommendationSummary - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-api/API_RecommendationSummary.html\"},{\"title\":\"What is Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer? - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-ug/welcome.html\"},{\"title\":\"Working with code reviews - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-ug/code-reviews.html\"},{\"title\":\"View recommendations and provide feedback - Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer\",\"url\":\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-ug/give-feedback-from-code-review-details.html\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer's feedback mechanism and training data:\n\n## Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down Feedback System\n\nA thumbs-up or thumbs-down icon is provided next to comments made by CodeGuru Reviewer, where you can choose a thumbs-up icon if the recommendation was helpful and a thumbs-down icon if it wasn't. You can give feedback on CodeGuru recommendations by clicking on the thumbs up or thumbs down below a recommendation.\n\n## Feedback and Training Data\n\nAfter a customer triggers a review, Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer uses the feedback you provide as labels and iteratively improves the quality of code detectors. Your feedback is used to improve CodeGuru Reviewer through model-tuning efforts that will help make CodeGuru Reviewer recommendations more useful to you and others.\n\n## Recommendation Suppression Mechanism\n\nTo suppress recommendations from CodeGuru Reviewer, you can create and add to the root directory of your repository an aws-codeguru-reviewer.yml file that lists files and directories to exclude from analysis.\n\n## API for Feedback\n\nYou can use PutRecommendationFeedback to store reactions and send feedback as UTF-8 text code for emojis. Additionally, ListRecommendationFeedback returns a list of RecommendationFeedbackSummary objects that contain customer recommendation feedback for all CodeGuru Reviewer users.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"959dc8b1-0bba-4989-9110-dd83d8cf5316","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:00.073Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"007141cc-16ee-41c4-a8e9-1fe95355652e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"959dc8b1-0bba-4989-9110-dd83d8cf5316","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01VJPK5H2fbJJdPGw5BQyrm5","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Let me get a couple more specific details on the LangMem gradient mechanism and on the Superpowers TDD skill content."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2569,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2087,"cache_read_input_tokens":13844,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2087,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERWvYqcsnFJgTem1EkG","type":"assistant","uuid":"eee3e9d7-d1ea-4734-89bb-28bfb8e0a42e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:55.471Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"eee3e9d7-d1ea-4734-89bb-28bfb8e0a42e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01VJPK5H2fbJJdPGw5BQyrm5","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01S9SZPe3WfFtDgFkiUa17iC","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangMem create_prompt_optimizer gradient kind \"collect feedback\" \"propose changes\" conversation trajectory code example 2025 2026"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2569,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2087,"cache_read_input_tokens":13844,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2087,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERWvYqcsnFJgTem1EkG","type":"assistant","uuid":"8145e364-674d-4ff2-a0cd-96fe9c97ca4c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:56.866Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8145e364-674d-4ff2-a0cd-96fe9c97ca4c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01VJPK5H2fbJJdPGw5BQyrm5","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01H5usnWtASKCXuy82EFewac","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"site:github.com/obra/superpowers skills test-driven-development SKILL.md \"observed\" \"baseline\" \"rationalization\""},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2569,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2087,"cache_read_input_tokens":13844,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2087,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERWvYqcsnFJgTem1EkG","type":"assistant","uuid":"9bbac413-6299-42a9-a203-87e0b81dea19","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:57.748Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9bbac413-6299-42a9-a203-87e0b81dea19","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01VJPK5H2fbJJdPGw5BQyrm5","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_0166XvFJJNonGJqPxeRX6MLs","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Google postmortem culture action items completion rate systemic issue detection prevention automation"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2569,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2087,"cache_read_input_tokens":13844,"output_tokens":223,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2087},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERWvYqcsnFJgTem1EkG","type":"assistant","uuid":"9b76fc6c-c51d-4d23-9712-f82aef719ec5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:58.167Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9b76fc6c-c51d-4d23-9712-f82aef719ec5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Google postmortem culture action items completion rate systemic issue detection prevention automation"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_0166XvFJJNonGJqPxeRX6MLs","uuid":"d57be696-1b61-485f-95a4-939ddb3ea800","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.644Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d57be696-1b61-485f-95a4-939ddb3ea800","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"site:github.com/obra/superpowers skills test-driven-development SKILL.md \"observed\" \"baseline\" \"rationalization\""},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01H5usnWtASKCXuy82EFewac","uuid":"e12686d3-5afd-40f7-8342-dc928eff20ac","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:37:59.785Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e12686d3-5afd-40f7-8342-dc928eff20ac","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Google postmortem culture action items completion rate systemic issue detection prevention automation"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01KevETX6m2bcRN9n6oNBcmf","parentToolUseID":"toolu_0166XvFJJNonGJqPxeRX6MLs","uuid":"9041572f-711e-471a-805e-d8c63f42d236","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:01.135Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9041572f-711e-471a-805e-d8c63f42d236","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangMem create_prompt_optimizer gradient collect feedback propose changes"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01S9SZPe3WfFtDgFkiUa17iC","uuid":"9c74a53e-6eda-4d4e-bbac-0644fb09d481","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:02.708Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9c74a53e-6eda-4d4e-bbac-0644fb09d481","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":1,"query":"site:github.com/obra/superpowers skills test-driven-development SKILL.md \"observed\" \"baseline\" \"rationalization\""},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01JzkDs6EzS8QV93qWf4mynX","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01H5usnWtASKCXuy82EFewac","uuid":"238ee6e4-9e4e-46d3-a536-0fc6574e49f5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:04.243Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"238ee6e4-9e4e-46d3-a536-0fc6574e49f5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangMem create_prompt_optimizer gradient collect feedback propose changes"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_015SLKWXCes8Ssu5HcDzDWVg","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01S9SZPe3WfFtDgFkiUa17iC","uuid":"64ebfe00-11d0-4b50-a4fa-55a6ba8fe3b8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:05.350Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9b76fc6c-c51d-4d23-9712-f82aef719ec5","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_0166XvFJJNonGJqPxeRX6MLs","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Google postmortem culture action items completion rate systemic issue detection prevention automation\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Google SRE - Postmortem Practices for Incident Management\",\"url\":\"https://sre.google/workbook/postmortem-culture/\"},{\"title\":\"40 SPRING 2017 VOL. 42, NO. 1 www.usenix.org SYSADMIN Postmortem Action Items\",\"url\":\"https://sre.google/static/pdf/login_spring17_09_lunney.pdf\"},{\"title\":\"Google SRE - Blameless Postmortem for System Resilience\",\"url\":\"https://sre.google/sre-book/postmortem-culture/\"},{\"title\":\"Postmortem Culture at Google: How do we learn from failures and how can you too? | Conf42\",\"url\":\"https://www.conf42.com/Site_Reliability_Engineering_2022_Ramon_Medrano_Llamas_postmortem_culture_google\"},{\"title\":\"Google SRE: Incident Postmortem Example for Outage Resolution\",\"url\":\"https://sre.google/sre-book/example-postmortem/\"},{\"title\":\"SRE Postmortem Best Practices: What Google, Netflix, and Amazon Actually Do | by Code blows | Let’s Code Future | Mar, 2026 | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://medium.com/lets-code-future/sre-postmortem-best-practices-what-google-netflix-and-amazon-actually-do-638797cdd445\"},{\"title\":\"Google's tips on how to hold a fearless shared postmortem | Google Cloud Blog\",\"url\":\"https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/fearless-shared-postmortems-cre-life-lessons\"},{\"title\":\"Rootly | SRE Incident Management Best Practices With Postmortem Tools\",\"url\":\"https://rootly.com/sre/sre-incident-management-best-practices-with-postmortem-tools\"},{\"title\":\"Postmortem Template to Optimize Your Incident Response | ilert\",\"url\":\"https://www.ilert.com/blog/postmortem-template-to-optimize-your-incident-response\"},{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Postmortems: A guide | Last9\",\"url\":\"https://last9.io/blog/best-practices-for-postmortems-a-guide/\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what Google's postmortem culture reveals about action items completion rates, systemic issue detection, and prevention automation:\n\n## Action Items Tracking and Completion\n\nGoogle prioritizes postmortem work, tracks postmortem completion and review, and allows teams adequate time to implement associated action plans. Teams plan out action item completion schedules and monitor progress, such as tracking burndown for a single postmortem where all 20 actions were planned to be completed over 21 days.\n\n## Detecting Systemic Issues\n\nWhen teams are experiencing failures that mirror previous incidents, Google digs deeper to identify systemic process or technical problems. Treating each incident in isolation can hide recurring issues; regularly reviewing multiple postmortems helps detect patterns, systemic weaknesses, or process gaps to inform broader improvements and prevent similar incidents.\n\n## Prevention and Automation Approach\n\nRather than trying to change human behavior, Google focuses on changing automated systems and processes as this approach is more reliable. Google explicitly redirects root cause analysis by asking: what system or process allowed or encouraged that decision, rather than blaming the person. Although it's impossible to fully automate every step of writing postmortems, postmortem templates and tooling make the process run more smoothly, freeing up time for authors to focus on critical aspects like root-cause analysis and action item planning.\n\nGoogle includes one action item from each of its core principles: detection, prevention, and mitigation, in an attempt to ensure each incident won't occur again.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"3e935274-dd49-4472-9f21-62393bfac2e8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:06.564Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"9b76fc6c-c51d-4d23-9712-f82aef719ec5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9bbac413-6299-42a9-a203-87e0b81dea19","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01H5usnWtASKCXuy82EFewac","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"site:github.com/obra/superpowers skills test-driven-development SKILL.md \"observed\" \"baseline\" \"rationalization\"\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"superpowers/skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md at main · obra/superpowers\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md\"}]\n\nI found the search result! The query returned a GitHub page from the obra/superpowers repository. Here's what the search found:\n\nThe result is from \"testing-skills-with-subagents.md\" which describes a methodology for testing skills by running scenarios without the skill first, then documenting baseline failures, and writing skills to address only the actual failures observed.\n\nThe document compares testing skills to Test-Driven Development (TDD) applied to process documentation, using a RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle where you watch agents fail without the skill, write a skill addressing those failures to make them comply, then close loopholes.\n\nThe page includes practical guidance on common testing mistakes to avoid and emphasizes the importance of watching an agent fail without the skill before deploying it, to ensure you know the skill prevents the right failures.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"9304a774-dd8b-4c4a-b66c-4af01c536170","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:06.706Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"9bbac413-6299-42a9-a203-87e0b81dea19","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8145e364-674d-4ff2-a0cd-96fe9c97ca4c","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01S9SZPe3WfFtDgFkiUa17iC","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangMem create_prompt_optimizer gradient kind \"collect feedback\" \"propose changes\" conversation trajectory code example 2025 2026\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Prompt Optimization API Reference\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/reference/prompt_optimization/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize a Prompt\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_memory_prompt/\"},{\"title\":\"Exploring Prompt Optimization\",\"url\":\"https://blog.langchain.com/exploring-prompt-optimization/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Optimize Multiple Prompts\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_compound_system/\"},{\"title\":\"[2305.03495] Automatic Prompt Optimization with \\\"Gradient Descent\\\" and Beam Search\",\"url\":\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03495\"},{\"title\":\"A Prompt Optimization System Based on Center-Aware Textual Gradients\",\"url\":\"https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/9/748\"},{\"title\":\"Automatic Prompt Optimization - by Cameron R. Wolfe, Ph.D.\",\"url\":\"https://cameronrwolfe.substack.com/p/automatic-prompt-optimization\"},{\"title\":\"GReaTer: Gradients Over Reasoning Makes Smaller Language Models Strong Prompt Optimizers | OpenReview\",\"url\":\"https://openreview.net/forum?id=fWRBheSJth\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - hinthornw/promptimizer: Prompt optimization scratch · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/hinthornw/promptimizer\"},{\"title\":\"Prompt Optimization with Two Gradients for Classification in Large Language Models\",\"url\":\"https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/6/8/182\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I found information about LangMem's `create_prompt_optimizer` function with the \"gradient\" kind and how it works with conversation trajectories and feedback. Here's what I found:\n\n## LangMem `create_prompt_optimizer` with Gradient Kind\n\nThe \"gradient\" optimizer divides work between two LLM calls: one to propose improvements and one to apply them to the actual prompt.\n\n### How it Works\n\nThe gradient approach involves collecting fine-grained feedback for each example where the prompt failed (these are the \"gradients\") and then proposing prompt updates based on these collected \"gradients\".\n\n### Code Example\n\nHere's a practical code example from the LangMem documentation:\n\n```python\noptimizer = create_prompt_optimizer(\n    \"anthropic:claude-3-5-sonnet-latest\",\n    kind=\"gradient\",\n    config={\n        \"max_reflection_steps\": 3,\n        \"min_reflection_steps\": 1\n    }\n)\nupdated = optimizer.invoke(\n    {\"trajectories\": trajectories, \"prompt\": \"You are a planetary science expert\"}\n)\n```\n\n### Working with Conversation Trajectories\n\nThe optimizer accepts conversation trajectories with optional feedback annotations. Example conversations can be provided without annotations or with feedback like scores and comments such as \"Should include more details and recommended follow-up questions\".\n\nThe gradient optimizer uses this conversation history to improve prompts by analyzing where the system falls short and proposing targeted changes based on the collected feedback patterns.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"40a8c204-113c-4dab-8732-c174a8bddd96","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:10.201Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"8145e364-674d-4ff2-a0cd-96fe9c97ca4c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"40a8c204-113c-4dab-8732-c174a8bddd96","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017WyYSU1Yvms8sAYSEBVXP8","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me look at Wazir's current review and findings infrastructure to understand what already exists."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1288,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3628,"cache_read_input_tokens":15931,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3628,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERaRKnmmgprFgGqkiMn","type":"assistant","uuid":"30cf056a-a0ed-4524-a697-c7091ae78699","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:43.655Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"30cf056a-a0ed-4524-a697-c7091ae78699","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017WyYSU1Yvms8sAYSEBVXP8","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"cumulative.findings|antipattern|finding.*log|review.*finding","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1288,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3628,"cache_read_input_tokens":15931,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3628,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERaRKnmmgprFgGqkiMn","type":"assistant","uuid":"f85a3ebe-8832-4249-a094-5c711f474014","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:45.116Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f85a3ebe-8832-4249-a094-5c711f474014","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","uuid":"092e3daf-e9a4-40d8-b428-24072f16f5c2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:45.120Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"092e3daf-e9a4-40d8-b428-24072f16f5c2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","toolUseID":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:45.238Z","uuid":"30894dab-b92e-4367-b6bb-d1e69870427d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f85a3ebe-8832-4249-a094-5c711f474014","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01UPEcK11bUphm4htkMmbQaq","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 124 files\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/discover.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/learn.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/plan-review.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/review.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/spec-challenge.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/specify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/verify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/learner.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/clarify.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/design-review.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/writing-plans/SKILL.md\nskills/brainstorming/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\nskills/clarifier/SKILL.md\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\nworkflows/learn.md\ninput/2026-03-20-remaining.md\nworkflows/plan-review.md\nworkflows/verify.md\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\nllms-full.txt\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\ndocs/concepts/architecture.md\ndocs/concepts/why-wazir.md\ndocs/readmes/features/expertise/README.md\nCHANGELOG.md\nskills/claude-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/gemini-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/codex-cli/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/prepare-next.md\ntooling/test/validate.test.js\ntooling/src/adapters/composition-engine.js\nskills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md\nskills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md\nskills/run-audit/SKILL.md\nskills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md\nskills/humanize/SKILL.md\nskills/executing-plans/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/adapters/composition-engine.test.js\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-enhancement-decisions.md\ntooling/src/checks/ac-matrix.js\nworkflows/spec-challenge.md\nworkflows/specify.md\nworkflows/design-review.md\nworkflows/discover.md\nworkflows/clarify.md\nroles/reviewer.md\nexpertise/humanize/self-audit-checklist.md\nexpertise/security/agentic-identity.md\nworkflows/review.md\nroles/learner.md\ndocs/readmes/features/roles/README.md\ndocs/readmes/features/roles/learner.md\ndocs/readmes/features/roles/reviewer.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/execute.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/review.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/design-review.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/author.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/design.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/plan.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/README.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/plan-review.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/spec-challenge.md\ndocs/readmes/features/workflows/learn.md\ndocs/reference/expertise-index.md\ndocs/reference/templates.md\ndocs/concepts/composition-engine.md\nexpertise/index.md\nexpertise/index.yaml\nexpertise/humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md\nexpertise/humanize/index.md\nexpertise/composition-map.yaml\nexpertise/humanize/domain-rules-code.md\nassets/composition-engine.mmd\nexpertise/content/foundations/microcopy.md\nexpertise/frontend/react-native.md\nexpertise/quality/evidence-based-verification.md\nexpertise/infrastructure/devops-cicd.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/backend/caching-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/backend/database-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/backend/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/code/architecture-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/code/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/code/testing-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/design/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/design/ui-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/css-layout-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/flutter-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/react-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/performance/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/performance/performance-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/code-review-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/index.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/PROGRESS.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/security/index.md\nexpertise/architecture/decisions/monolith-to-microservices.md\nexpertise/architecture/decisions/technology-selection.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/idempotency-and-retry.md\nexpertise/architecture/distributed/saga-pattern.md\nexpertise/architecture/foundations/coupling-and-cohesion.md\nexpertise/architecture/foundations/design-principles-solid.md\nexpertise/architecture/foundations/separation-of-concerns.md\nexpertise/architecture/mobile-architecture/mobile-app-architecture.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/usability-testing.md\nexpertise/design/disciplines/user-research.md\nexpertise/design/psychology/error-psychology.md\nexpertise/infrastructure/database-mongodb.md\nexpertise/performance/backend/database-query-optimization.md\nexpertise/performance/platform-specific/flutter-performance.md\nexpertise/quality/testing-mobile.md\nexpertise/quality/testing-web.md\nexpertise/security/infrastructure/cloud-security-gcp.md\nexpertise/security/testing/penetration-testing.md\nexpertise/security/testing/security-code-review.md\nexpertise/security/testing/vulnerability-scanning.md\ntemplates/artifacts/learning-proposal.md\ntemplates/artifacts/proposed-learning.template.json\ntemplates/artifacts/review-findings.md"}]},"uuid":"2ed7dd88-6bdf-4b74-a3e4-2cdf08492ef2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:45.238Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f85a3ebe-8832-4249-a094-5c711f474014","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2ed7dd88-6bdf-4b74-a3e4-2cdf08492ef2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_017WyYSU1Yvms8sAYSEBVXP8","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"feedback.*loop|learning.*loop|promote|recur","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":15},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1288,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3628,"cache_read_input_tokens":15931,"output_tokens":236,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3628},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERaRKnmmgprFgGqkiMn","type":"assistant","uuid":"3db5022b-e111-4b04-8a80-e78dad732f7b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:46.326Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3db5022b-e111-4b04-8a80-e78dad732f7b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","parentToolUseID":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","uuid":"e765402e-09f9-434a-abb4-e73e6ed0fa35","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:46.328Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e765402e-09f9-434a-abb4-e73e6ed0fa35","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","toolUseID":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:46.434Z","uuid":"8382cada-e76d-475f-87e3-c7b37210f597","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"3db5022b-e111-4b04-8a80-e78dad732f7b","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_014e8G2ieRsdV56xj77tFbyh","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 15 files limit: 15, offset: 0\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/learn.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/guard-hooks.test.js\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\nworkflows/learn.md\ntooling/test/capture/decision.test.js\ntooling/test/guards/phase-prerequisite-guard.test.js\ntooling/src/capture/command.js\ntooling/src/capture/store.js\ntooling/test/capture/user-input.test.js\ntooling/test/guards/validate-run-completion.test.js\ntooling/test/init/auto-detect.test.js\ntooling/test/verify/proof-collector.test.js\ntooling/src/init/auto-detect.js"}]},"uuid":"53cef79c-1af4-4077-a5e4-992a70e9db7b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:38:46.434Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"3db5022b-e111-4b04-8a80-e78dad732f7b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"53cef79c-1af4-4077-a5e4-992a70e9db7b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Mkj45vRcMWrqqNymRy3ozT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me look at the key files that define Wazir's current review and learning infrastructure."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3451,"cache_read_input_tokens":19559,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3451,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdSCiEmakWESHEVwBo","type":"assistant","uuid":"82cf984c-8916-4f02-bacd-644fceec5c3f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.024Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"82cf984c-8916-4f02-bacd-644fceec5c3f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Mkj45vRcMWrqqNymRy3ozT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/templates/artifacts/review-findings.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3451,"cache_read_input_tokens":19559,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3451,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdSCiEmakWESHEVwBo","type":"assistant","uuid":"6cdecb2d-4af0-49f7-a999-f7964139f09d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.155Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6cdecb2d-4af0-49f7-a999-f7964139f09d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","uuid":"55de5069-c631-4ac5-9194-7afad1742c70","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.158Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"55de5069-c631-4ac5-9194-7afad1742c70","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","toolUseID":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.252Z","uuid":"69a494d5-9f62-4326-8433-1390a855dab9","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6cdecb2d-4af0-49f7-a999-f7964139f09d","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01MS6AVoh4GNgrkMPL8DNAS4","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→artifact_type: review\n     3→phase: review\n     4→role: reviewer\n     5→run_id: <run-id>\n     6→loop: 1\n     7→status: draft\n     8→sources:\n     9→  - <verification-proof>\n    10→approval_status: required\n    11→---\n    12→\n    13→# Review Findings\n    14→\n    15→## Findings\n    16→\n    17→## Evidence\n    18→\n    19→## Verdict\n    20→"}]},"uuid":"e303ecca-05ad-4b5d-9b15-0e37f3c23fae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.252Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6cdecb2d-4af0-49f7-a999-f7964139f09d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e303ecca-05ad-4b5d-9b15-0e37f3c23fae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Mkj45vRcMWrqqNymRy3ozT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/templates/artifacts/learning-proposal.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3451,"cache_read_input_tokens":19559,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3451,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdSCiEmakWESHEVwBo","type":"assistant","uuid":"fac8ffe6-09fd-4da0-b128-38f6b16c51a6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.604Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fac8ffe6-09fd-4da0-b128-38f6b16c51a6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","parentToolUseID":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","uuid":"368a5054-9fcf-489a-bdd8-edaee9bc0602","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.606Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"368a5054-9fcf-489a-bdd8-edaee9bc0602","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","toolUseID":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.688Z","uuid":"ca47ba79-aa3b-4c95-b87f-e89b7707b33e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fac8ffe6-09fd-4da0-b128-38f6b16c51a6","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_014t7JkGiyqoBvW3R4RQCEkX","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→artifact_type: proposed_learning\n     3→phase: learn\n     4→role: learner\n     5→run_id: <run-id>\n     6→loop: 1\n     7→status: proposed\n     8→sources:\n     9→  - <review-findings>\n    10→approval_status: required\n    11→---\n    12→\n    13→# Proposed Learning\n    14→\n    15→## Scope\n    16→\n    17→## Evidence\n    18→\n    19→## Expected Benefit\n    20→"}]},"uuid":"ba688363-d21f-4aca-a70f-a823fdc294cd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.688Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"fac8ffe6-09fd-4da0-b128-38f6b16c51a6","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ba688363-d21f-4aca-a70f-a823fdc294cd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Mkj45vRcMWrqqNymRy3ozT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/workflows/learn.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3451,"cache_read_input_tokens":19559,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3451,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdSCiEmakWESHEVwBo","type":"assistant","uuid":"1104e64d-3231-4070-beac-55a34123b1b8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.957Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1104e64d-3231-4070-beac-55a34123b1b8","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","uuid":"565ed5ed-9023-40c3-847e-9e52ed32b682","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:25.958Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"565ed5ed-9023-40c3-847e-9e52ed32b682","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","toolUseID":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:26.037Z","uuid":"c60b8462-57a5-40a9-86bb-27ce8c395e14","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1104e64d-3231-4070-beac-55a34123b1b8","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01GAUyD9P1cxnGgm8o7FGMxm","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# learn\n     2→\n     3→## Purpose\n     4→\n     5→Extract durable scoped learnings and experiments from the completed run.\n     6→\n     7→## Phase entry\n     8→\n     9→On entering this phase, run:\n    10→`wazir capture event --run <run-id> --event phase_enter --phase <phase-name> --status in_progress`\n    11→\n    12→## Inputs\n    13→\n    14→- run artifacts\n    15→- review findings\n    16→- verification proof\n    17→\n    18→## Primary Role\n    19→\n    20→- `learner`\n    21→\n    22→## Steps\n    23→\n    24→1. **Read decision log:** Read `.wazir/runs/<id>/decisions.ndjson` to identify recurring decision patterns for learning extraction. Look for decisions with low confidence, decisions that were revised, and decisions that produced unexpected outcomes.\n    25→\n    26→2. **Write proposed learnings:** Write one proposed learning file per durable insight to `memory/learnings/proposed/run-<id>-NNN.md` using `templates/artifacts/learning-proposal.md` as template. Each file must include scope tags, confidence level, and the evidence chain from the run that produced it.\n    27→\n    28→3. **Append cumulative findings:** Append a summary of this run's review findings to `memory/findings/cumulative-findings.md`. Format:\n    29→   ```\n    30→   ## Run <id> (YYYY-MM-DD)\n    31→   - [finding]\n    32→   ```\n    33→\n    34→4. **Check for antipattern review trigger:** After every 5th run (check count of `## Run` headers in `memory/findings/cumulative-findings.md`): output 'N runs accumulated. Review cumulative findings for new antipattern candidates?'\n    35→\n    36→## Outputs\n    37→\n    38→- proposed learning artifacts in `memory/learnings/proposed/run-<id>-NNN.md`\n    39→- experiment summaries\n    40→- cumulative findings appended to `memory/findings/cumulative-findings.md`\n    41→\n    42→## Approval Gate\n    43→\n    44→- accepted learnings require explicit review and scope tags\n    45→\n    46→## Phase exit\n    47→\n    48→On completing this phase, run:\n    49→`wazir capture event --run <run-id> --event phase_exit --phase <phase-name> --status completed`\n    50→\n    51→## Failure Conditions\n    52→\n    53→- auto-applied learning drift\n    54→"}]},"uuid":"eeb09423-79f3-44b2-8be4-5e5f1487a494","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:26.037Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"1104e64d-3231-4070-beac-55a34123b1b8","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"eeb09423-79f3-44b2-8be4-5e5f1487a494","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01Mkj45vRcMWrqqNymRy3ozT","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01A3Ur7mfFEXzV8seuMj6nj4","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3451,"cache_read_input_tokens":19559,"output_tokens":291,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3451},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERdSCiEmakWESHEVwBo","type":"assistant","uuid":"89375fba-1d51-4c05-ad14-243372136032","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:26.529Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"89375fba-1d51-4c05-ad14-243372136032","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01A3Ur7mfFEXzV8seuMj6nj4","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A3Ur7mfFEXzV8seuMj6nj4","uuid":"b45ae342-9ed9-41bb-aca9-25c1006a342b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:26.532Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"89375fba-1d51-4c05-ad14-243372136032","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","content":"File content (12526 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","is_error":true,"tool_use_id":"toolu_01A3Ur7mfFEXzV8seuMj6nj4"}]},"uuid":"aff048a4-4aee-42c2-8fb3-bfe2698d75b0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:29.043Z","toolUseResult":"Error: File content (12526 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file.","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"89375fba-1d51-4c05-ad14-243372136032","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"aff048a4-4aee-42c2-8fb3-bfe2698d75b0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012iendfnB48zcwTytwbMYRE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md","limit":60},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1565,"cache_read_input_tokens":23010,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1565,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":25,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReAUghRvZjViaRWYWo","type":"assistant","uuid":"149b65f1-6677-4e9f-ae5e-6ee96451c068","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.368Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"149b65f1-6677-4e9f-ae5e-6ee96451c068","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","uuid":"c3957a22-03f8-4179-829f-6870642a1688","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.370Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"c3957a22-03f8-4179-829f-6870642a1688","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","toolUseID":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.456Z","uuid":"3659395d-1356-4d11-b7cb-62f9f0ef2714","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"149b65f1-6677-4e9f-ae5e-6ee96451c068","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01NbWwp2VpoHW9DTbqL1EH7H","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# AI Coding Anti-Patterns\n     2→\n     3→> AI coding agents produce code that compiles, passes superficial review, and reads authoritatively -- yet harbors systematic defects that human-written code rarely exhibits. These anti-patterns arise from the fundamental mechanics of next-token prediction operating without ground truth, persistent memory, or genuine understanding. A 2026 CodeRabbit analysis of 470 open-source repositories found AI-generated code contains 1.7x more bugs than human code, with 75% more logic errors and 57% more security findings per pull request. A USENIX Security 2025 study of 576,000 code samples found 20% of AI-recommended packages do not exist. This module catalogs the 20 most damaging patterns, grounded in documented incidents and empirical research.\n     4→\n     5→> **Domain:** Process -- AI-Assisted Development\n     6→> **Anti-patterns covered:** 22\n     7→> **Highest severity:** Critical\n     8→> **Primary audience:** AI agents performing self-evaluation; human reviewers auditing AI output\n     9→\n    10→---\n    11→\n    12→## Anti-Patterns\n    13→\n    14→### AP-01: Hallucinated APIs\n    15→\n    16→**Also known as:** Phantom Functions, Slopsquatting Vector, Confabulated Interfaces\n    17→**Frequency:** Very Common\n    18→**Severity:** Critical\n    19→**Detection difficulty:** Moderate\n    20→\n    21→**What it looks like:**\n    22→\n    23→```python\n    24→# AI-generated code for OpenAI API\n    25→from openai import ChatCompletion\n    26→response = ChatCompletion.create(model=\"gpt-4\", messages=[...])\n    27→# ChatCompletion.create() was removed in openai>=1.0.0\n    28→# Correct: client.chat.completions.create(...)\n    29→```\n    30→\n    31→```javascript\n    32→import { useFormState } from 'react';\n    33→// useFormState does not exist -- it was briefly in react-dom canary,\n    34→// then renamed to useActionState in React 19\n    35→```\n    36→\n    37→**Why AI agents do it:**\n    38→\n    39→Training data contains both old and new API surfaces. The model blends them, producing calls that are syntactically plausible but reference a version that never existed in that form. A Stanford/Hugging Face study found over 42% of code snippets from major AI tools contain hallucinations. Worse, hallucinated package names create a supply-chain attack vector called \"slopsquatting\": USENIX 2025 researchers found 38% of hallucinated packages are conflations (e.g., `express-mongoose`), 13% are typo variants, and 51% are pure fabrications. One hallucinated package, `huggingface-cli`, was downloaded 30,000+ times in three months despite containing no code.\n    40→\n    41→**What goes wrong:**\n    42→\n    43→`AttributeError` or `ModuleNotFoundError` at runtime. Attackers register packages with hallucinated names, embedding malware. 43% of hallucinated packages are repeated deterministically across runs, making them reliable attack targets.\n    44→\n    45→**The fix:**\n    46→\n    47→Pin library versions in prompts: \"Using openai==1.30.0, use `client.chat.completions.create()`.\" Verify every import against installed package exports. Lock dependencies to approved registries.\n    48→\n    49→**Detection rule:**\n    50→\n    51→Run `python -c \"import <module>; dir(<module>)\"` to verify imported names. Flag function calls absent from type stubs. Verify all packages exist in the public registry before `pip install` or `npm install`.\n    52→\n    53→---\n    54→\n    55→### AP-02: Outdated Patterns\n    56→\n    57→**Also known as:** Temporal Mismatch, Legacy Style, Training Data Lag\n    58→**Frequency:** Very Common\n    59→**Severity:** High\n    60→**Detection difficulty:** Hard"}]},"uuid":"95161bd9-38be-47ab-adeb-9bc5c35056d3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.456Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"149b65f1-6677-4e9f-ae5e-6ee96451c068","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95161bd9-38be-47ab-adeb-9bc5c35056d3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012iendfnB48zcwTytwbMYRE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/roles/learner.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1565,"cache_read_input_tokens":23010,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1565,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":25,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReAUghRvZjViaRWYWo","type":"assistant","uuid":"b0048acf-a84f-4958-865a-16cba26ebfcc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.810Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b0048acf-a84f-4958-865a-16cba26ebfcc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","parentToolUseID":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","uuid":"95918414-223b-4e46-8dac-6d2aba469d87","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.812Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95918414-223b-4e46-8dac-6d2aba469d87","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","toolUseID":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.890Z","uuid":"4f553afd-ced9-4269-a41f-4a472a12eb63","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b0048acf-a84f-4958-865a-16cba26ebfcc","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_015i6zgnHFRrbjAEN6ezqwn2","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# learner\n     2→\n     3→## Purpose\n     4→\n     5→Extract durable scoped learnings and experiments without silently mutating the core system.\n     6→\n     7→## Inputs\n     8→\n     9→- run artifacts\n    10→- review findings\n    11→- verification evidence\n    12→\n    13→## Allowed Tools\n    14→\n    15→- local file reads\n    16→- artifact synthesis\n    17→- experiment/result comparison\n    18→- Wazir CLI recall and index commands (see Context retrieval)\n    19→\n    20→## Context retrieval\n    21→\n    22→Default approach: recall L0 (one-line summaries)\n    23→- Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L0` for high-level understanding\n    24→- Use `wazir index search-symbols <query>` to discover relevant patterns\n    25→- Escalate: L0 fails → try L1 → L1 fails → direct file read\n    26→- If recall fails, fall back to direct file reads\n    27→\n    28→## Required Outputs\n    29→\n    30→- proposed learning artifacts\n    31→- experiment summaries\n    32→- confidence and scope metadata\n    33→\n    34→## Git-Flow Responsibilities\n    35→\n    36→- record git-flow violations (bad branch names, non-conventional commits, missing changelog) as learnings\n    37→- track patterns of violations for injection into future executor prompts\n    38→\n    39→## Writing Quality\n    40→\n    41→All learning artifacts must avoid AI vocabulary patterns. Exception: hedging is appropriate and scientifically valid in learning contexts -- phrases like \"this suggests\" or \"preliminary evidence indicates\" are honest uncertainty, not AI tells. For domain-specific rules, see `expertise/humanize/domain-rules-technical-docs.md`.\n    42→\n    43→## Escalation Rules\n    44→\n    45→- escalate when a proposed learning is broad enough to affect fresh-run defaults or core operating rules\n    46→\n    47→## Failure Conditions\n    48→\n    49→- auto-applied learning drift\n    50→- missing evidence\n    51→- unscoped learnings\n    52→"}]},"uuid":"d0602909-a177-41d6-b01c-69999ae9a48c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:34.890Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"b0048acf-a84f-4958-865a-16cba26ebfcc","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d0602909-a177-41d6-b01c-69999ae9a48c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012iendfnB48zcwTytwbMYRE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1565,"cache_read_input_tokens":23010,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1565,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":25,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReAUghRvZjViaRWYWo","type":"assistant","uuid":"fcadc31d-ca3f-448a-b6cf-1fcbc366eacc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.469Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fcadc31d-ca3f-448a-b6cf-1fcbc366eacc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","uuid":"adf02ad4-59b7-44eb-add6-90af78ab1c62","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.469Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"adf02ad4-59b7-44eb-add6-90af78ab1c62","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012iendfnB48zcwTytwbMYRE","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/expertise/antipatterns/index.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1565,"cache_read_input_tokens":23010,"output_tokens":290,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1565},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZEReAUghRvZjViaRWYWo","type":"assistant","uuid":"6e4e839f-2f9e-4e96-b404-f2421a52ac6f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.595Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6e4e839f-2f9e-4e96-b404-f2421a52ac6f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","uuid":"4aa706ff-0957-4ee1-9629-879b9181a9d2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.595Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4aa706ff-0957-4ee1-9629-879b9181a9d2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","toolUseID":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.649Z","uuid":"491aecd4-42c6-4db2-9ba6-cca4793c57b0","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6e4e839f-2f9e-4e96-b404-f2421a52ac6f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01EaCSvQVXeM6rJpmZHp2EQF","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Directory Purpose\n     2→\n     3→The `antipatterns` directory categorizes common mistakes, technical debt, and bad practices across all areas of software engineering. It helps AI agents and developers recognize and avoid solutions that might seem effective but introduce long-term problems.\n     4→\n     5→# Key Concepts\n     6→\n     7→- Identifying and resolving technical debt\n     8→- Avoiding structural and architectural mistakes\n     9→- Recognizing poor code quality and smells\n    10→- Avoiding bad UI/UX and dark patterns\n    11→- Preventing common security and scaling pitfalls\n    12→\n    13→# File Map\n    14→\n    15→- `index.md` — semantic map of the antipatterns directory\n    16→\n    17→# Subdirectories\n    18→\n    19→- `/backend` — database, caching, auth, and microservices flaws\n    20→- `/code` — general code smells, async issues, and testing mistakes\n    21→- `/design` — bad UI/UX, dark patterns, and accessibility fails\n    22→- `/frontend` — SPA, CSS, and platform-specific UI antipatterns\n    23→- `/performance` — premature optimization and scaling errors\n    24→- `/process` — flaws in code review, deployment, and AI coding\n    25→- `/security` — security theater, vulnerability patterns, and secrets mismanagement\n    26→\n    27→# Reading Guide\n    28→\n    29→If reviewing general code quality → read `/code`\n    30→If evaluating system design → read `/backend` or `/performance`\n    31→If auditing security practices → read `/security`"}]},"uuid":"a202ff7b-5ec4-44ae-82a5-1e7aef7a9aae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:35.649Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6e4e839f-2f9e-4e96-b404-f2421a52ac6f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"a202ff7b-5ec4-44ae-82a5-1e7aef7a9aae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","toolUseID":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:37.369Z","uuid":"6333460c-0402-45f1-bbed-91efe33ef11d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fcadc31d-ca3f-448a-b6cf-1fcbc366eacc","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01D6ymymbrEp2BpnD3gw4aeG","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Review Loop Pattern Reference\n     2→\n     3→Canonical reference for the review loop pattern used across all Wazir pipeline phases. Skills and workflows link to this document rather than embedding loop logic inline.\n     4→\n     5→---\n     6→\n     7→## Core Principle: Producer-Reviewer Separation\n     8→\n     9→The producer skill (clarifier, planner, designer, etc.) **emits** an artifact and calls for review. The **reviewer role** owns the review loop. The producer receives findings and resolves them. No role reviews its own output.\n    10→\n    11→```\n    12→Producer emits artifact\n    13→  -> Reviewer runs review loop (N passes, Codex if available)\n    14→  -> Findings returned to producer\n    15→  -> Producer fixes and resubmits\n    16→  -> Loop until all passes exhausted or cap reached\n    17→  -> Escalate to user if cap exceeded\n    18→```\n    19→\n    20→When Codex is available, the reviewer role delegates to `codex review` as a secondary input while maintaining its own independent primary verdict.\n    21→\n    22→---\n    23→\n    24→## Per-Task Review vs Final Review\n    25→\n    26→These are two structurally different constructs:\n    27→\n    28→| | Per-Task Review | Final Review |\n    29→|---|---|---|\n    30→| **When** | During execution, after each task | After all execution + verification complete |\n    31→| **Dimensions** | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | 9 scored dims (correctness, completeness, wiring, verification, drift, quality, documentation, intent alignment, scope coverage) |\n    32→| **Scope** | Single task's uncommitted changes | Entire implementation vs spec/plan |\n    33→| **Output** | Pass/fix loop, no score | Scored verdict (0-90), PASS/FAIL |\n    34→| **Workflow** | Inline in execution flow | `workflows/review.md` |\n    35→| **Skill** | `wz:reviewer` in `task-review` mode | `wz:reviewer` in `final` mode |\n    36→| **Log filename** | `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` | `final-review.md` |\n    37→\n    38→---\n    39→\n    40→## Standalone Mode\n    41→\n    42→When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` directory exists (standalone skill invocation outside a pipeline run):\n    43→\n    44→1. **Review loops still run** -- the review logic is embedded in the skill, not dependent on run state.\n    45→2. **Artifact location** -- artifacts live in `docs/plans/`. This is the canonical standalone artifact path.\n    46→3. **Review log location** -- review logs go alongside the artifact: `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md`. No temp dir.\n    47→4. **Loop cap is SKIPPED entirely** -- no `wazir capture loop-check` call. The loop runs for exactly `pass_counts[depth]` passes (3/5/7) and stops. No cap guard, no fallback constant.\n    48→5. **`wazir capture loop-check`** -- not invoked in standalone mode. The standalone detection happens before the cap guard call.\n    49→\n    50→Detection logic:\n    51→\n    52→```\n    53→if .wazir/runs/latest/ exists:\n    54→  run_mode = \"pipeline\"\n    55→  log_dir = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/\n    56→  cap_guard = wazir capture loop-check (full guard)\n    57→else:\n    58→  run_mode = \"standalone\"\n    59→  artifact_dir = docs/plans/\n    60→  log_dir = docs/plans/  (alongside artifact)\n    61→  cap_guard = none (depth pass count is the only limit)\n    62→```\n    63→\n    64→---\n    65→\n    66→## Review Loop Pseudocode\n    67→\n    68→```\n    69→review_loop(artifact_path, phase, dimensions[], depth, config, options={}):\n    70→\n    71→  # options.mode      -- explicit review mode (required)\n    72→  # options.task_id   -- task identifier for task-scoped reviews (optional)\n    73→\n    74→  # Standalone detection\n    75→  run_mode = detect_run_mode()  # \"pipeline\" or \"standalone\"\n    76→\n    77→  # Fixed pass counts -- no extension\n    78→  pass_counts = { quick: 3, standard: 5, deep: 7 }\n    79→  total_passes = pass_counts[depth]\n    80→\n    81→  # Depth-aware dimension subsets (coverage contract)\n    82→  depth_dimensions = {\n    83→    quick:    dimensions[0:3],     # first 3 dimensions only\n    84→    standard: dimensions[0:5],     # first 5\n    85→    deep:     dimensions,          # all available\n    86→  }\n    87→  active_dims = depth_dimensions[depth]\n    88→\n    89→  codex_available = check_codex()  # which codex && codex --version\n    90→\n    91→  for pass_number in 0..total_passes-1:\n    92→\n    93→    # --- Cap guard check (pipeline mode only, before each pass) ---\n    94→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n    95→      loop_check_args = \"--run <run-id> --phase <phase> --loop-count <pass_number+1>\"\n    96→      if options.task_id:\n    97→        loop_check_args += \" --task-id <task_id>\"\n    98→      wazir capture loop-check $loop_check_args\n    99→      # loop-check wraps: event capture + evaluateLoopCapGuard\n   100→      # If loop_cap_guard fires (exit 43), stop immediately:\n   101→      if last_exit_code == 43:\n   102→        log(\"Loop cap reached for phase: <phase>. Escalating to user.\")\n   103→        escalate_to_user(evidence_gathered_so_far)\n   104→        return { pass_count: pass_number, escalated: true }\n   105→    # Standalone mode: no cap guard. Loop runs for total_passes and stops.\n   106→\n   107→    dimension = active_dims[pass_number % len(active_dims)]\n   108→\n   109→    # --- Primary review (reviewer role, not producer) ---\n   110→    # Mode is always explicit -- passed by caller via options.mode\n   111→    findings = self_review(artifact_path, focus=dimension, mode=options.mode)\n   112→\n   113→    # --- Secondary review (Codex, if available) ---\n   114→    if codex_available:\n   115→      codex_exit_code, codex_output = run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension)\n   116→      if codex_exit_code != 0:\n   117→        # Codex failed -- log error, fall back to self-review for this pass\n   118→        log_error(\"Codex exited \" + codex_exit_code + \": \" + codex_output.stderr)\n   119→        mark_pass_codex_unavailable(pass_number)\n   120→        # Do NOT treat Codex failure as clean. Self-review findings stand alone.\n   121→      else:\n   122→        codex_findings = parse(codex_output.stdout)\n   123→        merge(findings, codex_findings, preserve_attribution=true)\n   124→\n   125→    # --- Log the review pass ---\n   126→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n   127→      if options.task_id:\n   128→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-task-<task_id>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   129→      else:\n   130→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   131→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   132→    else:\n   133→      log_path = docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   134→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   135→\n   136→    if findings.has_issues:\n   137→      # --- Fix and re-submit (MANDATORY) ---\n   138→      # The producer MUST fix findings and the reviewer MUST re-review.\n   139→      # \"Fix and continue without re-review\" is EXPLICITLY PROHIBITED.\n   140→      producer_fix(artifact_path, findings)\n   141→      # Continue to next pass -- the fix will be re-reviewed\n   142→\n   143→  # --- Post-loop: escalation if issues remain ---\n   144→  if remaining.has_issues:\n   145→    # Cap reached with unresolved findings. Present to user:\n   146→    # 1. Approve with known issues (Recommended if non-blocking)\n   147→    # 2. Fix manually and re-run\n   148→    # 3. Abort\n   149→    escalate_to_user(remaining, options=[\n   150→      \"approve-with-issues\",\n   151→      \"fix-manually-and-rerun\",\n   152→      \"abort\"\n   153→    ])\n   154→    # User decides. If approved, log \"user-approved-with-issues\" in final pass file.\n   155→\n   156→  return { pass_count: total_passes, issues_found, issues_fixed, remaining, attributions }\n   157→```\n   158→\n   159→Key properties of this pseudocode:\n   160→\n   161→1. **Fixed pass counts** -- Quick is exactly 3, standard exactly 5, deep exactly 7. No `max_passes = min_passes + 3`. No clean-streak early-exit. No extension.\n   162→2. **Task-scoped log filenames** -- `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` for per-task reviews, preventing log clobbering in parallel mode.\n   163→3. **Task-scoped loop cap keys** -- `--task-id` flag on `loop-check` so each task gets its own counter in `phase_loop_counts`.\n   164→4. **Explicit review mode** -- `options.mode` is always passed by the caller. No auto-detection.\n   165→5. **Codex error handling** -- non-zero exit is logged, pass marked `codex-unavailable`, self-review findings used alone. Never treated as clean.\n   166→6. **Standalone mode** -- uses `docs/plans/` for artifacts and logs. No temp dir. No cap guard at all.\n   167→\n   168→---\n   169→\n   170→## Codex Error Handling Contract\n   171→\n   172→```\n   173→run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension):\n   174→  CODEX_MODEL = read_config('.wazir/state/config.json', '.multi_tool.codex.model') or \"gpt-5.4\"\n   175→\n   176→  if is_code_artifact:\n   177→    cmd = codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"...\" \"Review for [dimension]...\"\n   178→    # or: codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <sha> for committed changes\n   179→  else:\n   180→    cmd = cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this [type] for [dimension]...\"\n   181→\n   182→  result = execute(cmd, timeout=120s, capture_stderr=true)\n   183→\n   184→  if result.exit_code != 0:\n   185→    return (result.exit_code, { stderr: result.stderr, stdout: \"\" })\n   186→    # Caller handles: log error, mark codex-unavailable, use self-review only\n   187→\n   188→  return (0, { stdout: result.stdout, stderr: result.stderr })\n   189→```\n   190→\n   191→Rules:\n   192→\n   193→- If Codex exits non-zero, log the full stderr.\n   194→- Mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log metadata.\n   195→- Fall back to self-review for that pass only. Do not skip the pass.\n   196→- Do not retry Codex on the same pass. If Codex fails on pass 2, pass 3 still tries Codex (transient failures recover).\n   197→- Never treat a Codex failure as a clean review pass.\n   198→\n   199→---\n   200→\n   201→## Codex Availability Probe\n   202→\n   203→Before any Codex call, verify availability once at loop start:\n   204→\n   205→```bash\n   206→which codex >/dev/null 2>&1 && codex --version >/dev/null 2>&1\n   207→```\n   208→\n   209→If the probe fails, set `codex_available = false` for the entire loop. Fall back to self-review only. Never error out.\n   210→\n   211→Per-invocation failures (Codex available but a single call fails) are handled separately by the error contract above.\n   212→\n   213→---\n   214→\n   215→## Codex Artifact-Scoped Review\n   216→\n   217→Never use `codex review` for non-code artifacts (specs, plans, designs). Instead, pipe the artifact content via stdin:\n   218→\n   219→```bash\n   220→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   221→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   222→cat .wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md | \\\n   223→  codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this specification for: [dimension]. Be specific, cite sections. Say CLEAN if no issues.\" \\\n   224→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/spec-challenge-review-pass-N.md\n   225→```\n   226→\n   227→For code artifacts, use `codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted` (or `--base` for committed changes). See the next section for details.\n   228→\n   229→---\n   230→\n   231→## Code Review Scoping\n   232→\n   233→**Rule: review BEFORE commit.**\n   234→\n   235→For each task during execution:\n   236→\n   237→1. Implement the task (changes are uncommitted).\n   238→2. Review the uncommitted changes using the **5 task-execution dimensions** (NOT the 9 final-review dimensions):\n   239→   ```bash\n   240→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   241→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   242→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   243→     \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   244→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   245→   ```\n   246→3. Fix any findings (still uncommitted).\n   247→4. Re-review until all passes exhausted or cap reached.\n   248→5. **Only after review passes:** commit with conventional commit format.\n   249→\n   250→**If changes are already committed** (e.g., subagent workflow where the implementer subagent commits before review):\n   251→\n   252→```bash\n   253→# Capture the SHA before the task starts\n   254→PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n   255→\n   256→# ... subagent implements and commits ...\n   257→\n   258→# Review the committed changes against the pre-task baseline\n   259→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   260→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   261→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base $PRE_TASK_SHA --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   262→  \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   263→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   264→```\n   265→\n   266→---\n   267→\n   268→## Dimension Sets\n   269→\n   270→### Research Dimensions (5)\n   271→\n   272→1. **Coverage** -- all briefing topics researched\n   273→2. **Source quality** -- authoritative, current sources\n   274→3. **Relevance** -- research answers the actual questions\n   275→4. **Gaps** -- missing info that blocks later phases\n   276→5. **Contradictions** -- conflicting sources identified\n   277→\n   278→### Spec/Clarification Dimensions (5)\n   279→\n   280→1. **Completeness** -- all requirements covered\n   281→2. **Testability** -- each criterion verifiable\n   282→3. **Ambiguity** -- no dual-interpretation statements\n   283→4. **Assumptions** -- hidden assumptions explicit\n   284→5. **Scope creep** -- nothing beyond briefing\n   285→\n   286→### Design-Review Dimensions (5)\n   287→\n   288→Matches canonical `workflows/design-review.md`:\n   289→\n   290→1. **Spec coverage** -- does the design address every acceptance criterion with a visual component?\n   291→2. **Design-spec consistency** -- does the design introduce anything not in the spec? (scope creep check)\n   292→3. **Accessibility** -- color contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA), focus states, touch target sizes (44x44px minimum)\n   293→4. **Visual consistency** -- design tokens form a coherent system, dark/light mode alignment\n   294→5. **Exported-code fidelity** -- do exported scaffolds match the designs? Mismatches are failures here, not implementation concerns.\n   295→\n   296→### Plan Dimensions (8)\n   297→\n   298→1. **Completeness** -- all design decisions mapped to tasks\n   299→2. **Ordering** -- dependencies correct, parallelizable identified\n   300→3. **Atomicity** -- each task fits one session\n   301→4. **Testability** -- concrete verification per task\n   302→5. **Edge cases** -- error paths covered\n   303→6. **Security** -- auth, injection, data exposure\n   304→7. **Integration** -- tasks connect end-to-end\n   305→8. **Input Coverage** -- every distinct item in the original input maps to at least one task. If `tasks < input items`, HIGH finding listing missing items\n   306→\n   307→### Task Execution Dimensions (5)\n   308→\n   309→Used for per-task review during execution:\n   310→\n   311→1. **Correctness** -- code matches spec\n   312→2. **Tests** -- real tests, not mocked/faked\n   313→3. **Wiring** -- all paths connected\n   314→4. **Drift** -- matches task spec\n   315→5. **Quality** -- naming, error handling\n   316→\n   317→### Final Review Dimensions (9)\n   318→\n   319→Used for `workflows/review.md` scored gate:\n   320→\n   321→1. **Correctness** -- does the code do what the spec says?\n   322→2. **Completeness** -- are all acceptance criteria met?\n   323→3. **Wiring** -- are all paths connected end-to-end?\n   324→4. **Verification** -- is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim?\n   325→5. **Drift** -- does the implementation match the approved plan?\n   326→6. **Quality** -- code style, naming, error handling, security\n   327→7. **Documentation** -- changelog entries, commit messages, comments\n   328→8. **Intent Alignment** -- does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec. Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction.\n   329→9. **Scope Coverage** -- count distinct items in the original input vs items implemented. Flag missing items as HIGH. Score = (implemented / input items) * 10.\n   330→\n   331→The final review dimensions are the existing 9 from `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`. `workflows/review.md` is not modified by this pattern.\n   332→\n   333→---\n   334→\n   335→## Per-Depth Coverage Contract\n   336→\n   337→| Depth | Research | Spec | Design-Review | Plan | Task Execution | Final Review |\n   338→|-------|----------|------|---------------|------|----------------|--------------|\n   339→| Quick | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   340→| Standard | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   341→| Deep | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-7, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   342→\n   343→Pass counts are FIXED per depth. Quick = 3 passes, standard = 5 passes, deep = 7 passes. No extension. No early-exit. Final review is always a single scored pass across all 9 dimensions -- it is a gate, not a loop.\n   344→\n   345→---\n   346→\n   347→## Loop Cap Configuration\n   348→\n   349→The `workflow_policy` section of `run-config.yaml` (legacy: `phase_policy`) controls which workflows are enabled and sets an absolute safety ceiling per workflow. Only two fields exist: `enabled` and `loop_cap`. There is no `passes` field -- depth determines pass counts (3/5/7), not workflow policy.\n   350→\n   351→```yaml\n   352→workflow_policy:\n   353→  # Clarifier phase workflows\n   354→  discover:       { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   355→  clarify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   356→  specify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   357→  spec-challenge: { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   358→  author:         { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   359→  design:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   360→  design-review:  { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   361→  plan:           { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   362→  plan-review:    { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   363→  # Executor phase workflows\n   364→  execute:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   365→  verify:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   366→  review:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   367→  learn:          { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   368→  prepare_next:   { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   369→  run_audit:      { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   370→```\n   371→\n   372→**`loop_cap`** is an absolute safety ceiling that prevents runaway loops regardless of depth. It is checked by `wazir capture loop-check` in pipeline mode. It is NOT the same as pass count (which is determined by depth: 3/5/7). Example: depth=deep gives 7 passes, but if `loop_cap: 5`, the cap guard fires at pass 5 and escalates. This is intentional -- the operator can constrain expensive phases.\n   373→\n   374→**Adaptive workflows** (`author`, `run_audit`) default to `enabled: false`. They are activated by explicit operator config or intent detection.\n   375→\n   376→**Post-run workflows** (`learn`, `prepare_next`) default to `enabled: true`. They run as part of the Final Review phase:\n   377→\n   378→- `learn` extracts durable learnings from review findings -- recurring findings become accepted learnings.\n   379→- `prepare_next` prepares context and handoff for the next run.\n   380→- `author` has a human approval gate, not an iterative review loop.\n   381→- `run_audit` is an on-demand standalone audit, not part of the main pipeline flow.\n   382→\n   383→---\n   384→\n   385→## Reviewer Mode Table\n   386→\n   387→The reviewer skill operates in different modes depending on the phase. **Mode is always explicit** -- the caller passes `--mode <mode>`. There is no auto-detection based on artifact availability.\n   388→\n   389→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n   390→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n   391→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts in `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Verdict: PASS/NEEDS FIXES/NEEDS REWORK/FAIL |\n   392→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   393→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec, accessibility guidelines | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Findings with severity (blocking/advisory) |\n   394→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan, approved spec, design artifact | 7 plan dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   395→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes (or committed with known base SHA) | 5 task-execution dims | Pass/fail per task, no score |\n   396→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   397→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   398→\n   399→If `--mode` is not provided, the reviewer asks the user which review to run. Auto-detection based on artifact availability is NOT used -- it causes ambiguity in resumed/multi-phase runs where stale artifacts from prior phases exist.\n   400→\n   401→Each caller is responsible for passing the correct mode:\n   402→\n   403→- Clarifier passes `--mode clarification-review` after Phase 1A\n   404→- Discover workflow passes `--mode research-review` after research\n   405→- Specifier flow passes `--mode spec-challenge` after specify\n   406→- Brainstorming passes `--mode design-review` after user approval\n   407→- Writing-plans passes `--mode plan-review` after planning\n   408→- Executor passes `--mode task-review` for each task\n   409→- `/wazir` runner passes `--mode final` for the final review gate\n   410→\n   411→---\n   412→\n   413→## Codex Prompt Templates\n   414→\n   415→All Codex invocations read the model from config with a fallback:\n   416→\n   417→```bash\n   418→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   419→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   420→```\n   421→\n   422→### Artifact Review (specs, plans, designs via stdin)\n   423→\n   424→Use this template with `codex exec` for non-code artifacts piped via stdin:\n   425→\n   426→```bash\n   427→cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \\\n   428→  \"You are reviewing a [ARTIFACT_TYPE] for the Wazir engineering OS.\n   429→Focus on [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   430→Rules: cite specific sections, be actionable, say CLEAN if no issues.\n   431→Do NOT load or invoke any skills. Do NOT read the codebase.\n   432→Review ONLY the content provided via stdin.\"\n   433→```\n   434→\n   435→Replace `[ARTIFACT_TYPE]` with: `specification`, `implementation plan`, `design document`, `research brief`, or `clarification`.\n   436→Replace `[DIMENSION]` and `[dimension description]` with the current review pass dimension from the relevant dimension set above.\n   437→\n   438→### Code Review (diffs via --uncommitted or --base)\n   439→\n   440→Use this template with `codex review` for code changes:\n   441→\n   442→```bash\n   443→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   444→  \"Review the code changes for [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   445→Check against acceptance criteria: [criteria].\n   446→Flag: correctness issues, missing tests, unwired paths, drift from spec.\n   447→Do NOT load or invoke any skills.\"\n   448→```\n   449→\n   450→For committed changes, replace `--uncommitted` with `--base <sha>`.\n   451→Replace `[DIMENSION]`, `[dimension description]`, and `[criteria]` with the task-specific values from the execution plan and spec.\n   452→\n   453→---\n   454→\n   455→## Codex Output Context Protection\n   456→\n   457→Codex CLI output includes internal traces (file reads, tool calls, reasoning) that are NOT useful for the review — only the final findings matter. To prevent context flooding:\n   458→\n   459→### Tee + Extract Pattern\n   460→\n   461→1. **Always tee** Codex output to a file:\n   462→   ```bash\n   463→   codex exec ... 2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   464→   ```\n   465→\n   466→2. **Extract findings** after the last `codex` marker using `execute_file`:\n   467→   ```bash\n   468→   # If context-mode available (has_execute_file: true):\n   469→   mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute_file(\n   470→     path: \".wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\",\n   471→     language: \"shell\",\n   472→     code: \"tac $FILE | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\"\n   473→   )\n   474→   ```\n   475→\n   476→3. **Present extracted findings only** — the raw trace stays in the file for debugging but never enters the main context window.\n   477→\n   478→### Fallback (no context-mode)\n   479→\n   480→If `context_mode.has_execute_file` is false, extract using shell directly:\n   481→\n   482→```bash\n   483→tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→This reverses the file, finds the first (= last original) `codex` marker, reverses back, and skips the marker line.\n   487→\n   488→**If no marker found:** fail closed\n   489→\n   490→---\n   491→\n   492→## Phase Scoring: First vs Final Artifact Comparison\n   493→\n   494→At the start of each review loop (pass 1), score the artifact on its phase's canonical dimension set (1-10 per dimension). At the end of the loop (final pass), score again using the **same canonical dimensions**. Present the delta in the end-of-phase report.\n   495→\n   496→### Canonical Dimension Sets Per Phase\n   497→\n   498→These are the fixed rubrics — no ad-hoc dimension selection:\n   499→\n   500→| Phase | Canonical Dimensions |\n   501→|-------|---------------------|\n   502→| research-review | Coverage, Source quality, Relevance, Gaps identified, Actionability |\n   503→| clarification-review / spec-challenge | Completeness, Testability, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Scope creep |\n   504→| design-review | Spec coverage, Design-spec consistency, Accessibility, Visual consistency, Exported-code fidelity |\n   505→| plan-review | Completeness, Testability, Task granularity, Dependency correctness, Phase structure, File coverage, Estimation accuracy, Input coverage |\n   506→| task-review | Correctness, Tests, Wiring, Drift, Quality |\n   507→| final | Correctness, Completeness, Wiring, Verification, Drift, Quality, Documentation, Intent Alignment, Scope Coverage |\n   508→\n   509→### Scoring Rules\n   510→\n   511→1. Initial and final scores MUST use the **same dimension set** — the delta is only meaningful on the same rubric.\n   512→2. The reviewer records which dimension set was used in each pass file.\n   513→3. Delta format: `Dimension: X/10 → Y/10 (+Z)`.\n   514→\n   515→### Quality Delta Report Section\n   516→\n   517→The end-of-phase report (see \"End-of-Phase Report\" below) includes a **Quality Delta** section:\n   518→\n   519→```markdown\n   520→## Quality Delta\n   521→\n   522→| Dimension | Initial | Final | Delta |\n   523→|-----------|---------|-------|-------|\n   524→| Completeness | 4/10 | 9/10 | +5 |\n   525→| Testability | 3/10 | 8/10 | +5 |\n   526→| Ambiguity | 5/10 | 9/10 | +4 |\n   527→```\n   528→\n   529→---\n   530→\n   531→## End-of-Phase Report\n   532→\n   533→Every phase exit produces a report saved to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-report.md` containing:\n   534→\n   535→1. **Summary** — what the phase produced\n   536→2. **Key Changes** — first-version vs final-version highlights (not full diff — what improved)\n   537→3. **Quality Delta** — per-dimension before/after scores (see Phase Scoring above)\n   538→4. **Findings Log** — per-pass finding counts by severity (e.g., \"Pass 1: 6 findings (3 blocking, 2 warning, 1 note). Pass 7: 0 findings. All resolved.\")\n   539→5. **Usage** — token usage from `wazir capture usage` (runs before report generation)\n   540→6. **Context Savings** — context-mode stats if available, omit section if not\n   541→7. **Time Spent** — wall-clock elapsed time from phase start to end — log \"codex marker not found in output, cannot extract findings\" and present a warning to the user with 0 findings extracted. The raw file is preserved for manual review. Do NOT fall back to `tail` or any best-effort extraction that could leak traces into context.\n   542→"}]},"uuid":"44538289-88f3-4fc3-a2b6-3dd3db763be9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:37.365Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"fcadc31d-ca3f-448a-b6cf-1fcbc366eacc","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"44538289-88f3-4fc3-a2b6-3dd3db763be9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012YpxhKdyKNFp2v6UrreTJQ","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me look at the existing templates and the learner workflow to understand the current state of Wazir's feedback infrastructure."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":11716,"cache_read_input_tokens":24575,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":11716,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfqsJhDwVPNMpKqdea","type":"assistant","uuid":"50260027-36f6-4330-aa4d-f7bf9414dc60","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:58.061Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"50260027-36f6-4330-aa4d-f7bf9414dc60","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012YpxhKdyKNFp2v6UrreTJQ","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/templates/artifacts/proposed-learning.template.json"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":11716,"cache_read_input_tokens":24575,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":11716,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfqsJhDwVPNMpKqdea","type":"assistant","uuid":"07a81b7c-023e-4279-be1c-b9792734028f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.002Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"07a81b7c-023e-4279-be1c-b9792734028f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","uuid":"9f164a81-eb56-4846-a2c2-2913db384b1a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.002Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"9f164a81-eb56-4846-a2c2-2913db384b1a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","toolUseID":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.056Z","uuid":"e245f87d-9ff0-48cb-8a05-56e6bbdea45a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"07a81b7c-023e-4279-be1c-b9792734028f","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01JtjakXWY4Ew6k1W3MeHvFf","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→{\n     2→  \"run_id\": \"<run-id>\",\n     3→  \"phase\": \"learn\",\n     4→  \"role\": \"learner\",\n     5→  \"loop\": 1,\n     6→  \"status\": \"proposed\",\n     7→  \"sources\": [\n     8→    \"<review-findings>\"\n     9→  ],\n    10→  \"scope_tags\": [],\n    11→  \"evidence\": []\n    12→}\n    13→"}]},"uuid":"fe909960-247d-4595-a561-51552762387e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.056Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"07a81b7c-023e-4279-be1c-b9792734028f","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fe909960-247d-4595-a561-51552762387e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012YpxhKdyKNFp2v6UrreTJQ","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/reviewer/SKILL.md","limit":50},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":11716,"cache_read_input_tokens":24575,"output_tokens":188,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":11716},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERfqsJhDwVPNMpKqdea","type":"assistant","uuid":"2aae25a2-f05d-447e-b054-404c1d216f3b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.760Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2aae25a2-f05d-447e-b054-404c1d216f3b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","uuid":"cb36cb3a-eb36-4dae-9514-6144f699549c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.761Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cb36cb3a-eb36-4dae-9514-6144f699549c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","toolUseID":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.827Z","uuid":"54b11ecf-df76-4ea2-a250-e73d7d4dcb50","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2aae25a2-f05d-447e-b054-404c1d216f3b","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01RDNQfgBiCyzJY8whqszhJU","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:reviewer\n     3→description: Run the review phase — adversarial review of implementation against the approved spec, plan, and verification evidence.\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Reviewer\n     7→\n     8→## Model Annotation\n     9→When multi-model mode is enabled:\n    10→- **Sonnet** for internal review passes (internal-review)\n    11→- **Opus** for final review mode (final-review)\n    12→- **Opus** for spec-challenge mode (spec-harden)\n    13→- **Opus** for design-review mode (design)\n    14→\n    15→## Command Routing\n    16→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    17→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    18→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    19→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    20→\n    21→## Codebase Exploration\n    22→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    23→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    24→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    25→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    26→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    27→\n    28→Run the Final Review phase — or any review mode invoked by other phases.\n    29→\n    30→The reviewer role owns all review loops across the pipeline: research-review, clarification-review, spec-challenge, design-review, plan-review, per-task execution review, and final review. Each uses phase-specific dimensions from `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md`.\n    31→\n    32→**Key principle for `final` mode:** Compare implementation against the **ORIGINAL INPUT** (briefing + input files), NOT the task specs. The executor's per-task reviewer already validated against task specs — that concern is covered. The final reviewer catches drift: does what we built match what the user actually asked for?\n    33→\n    34→**Reviewer-owned responsibilities** (callers must NOT replicate these):\n    35→1. **Two-tier review** — internal review first (fast, cheap, expertise-loaded), Codex second (fresh eyes on clean code)\n    36→2. **Dimension selection** — the reviewer selects the correct dimension set for the review mode and depth\n    37→3. **Pass counting** — the reviewer tracks pass numbers and enforces the depth-based cap (quick=3, standard=5, deep=7)\n    38→4. **Finding attribution** — each finding is tagged `[Internal]`, `[Codex]`, or `[Both]` based on source\n    39→5. **Dimension set recording** — each review pass file records which canonical dimension set was used, enabling Phase Scoring (first vs final delta)\n    40→6. **Learning pipeline** — ALL findings (internal + Codex) feed into `state.sqlite` and the learning system\n    41→\n    42→## Review Modes\n    43→\n    44→The reviewer operates in different modes depending on the phase. Mode MUST be passed explicitly by the caller (`--mode <mode>`). The reviewer does NOT auto-detect mode from artifact availability. If `--mode` is not provided, ask the user which review to run.\n    45→\n    46→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n    47→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n    48→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts, approved spec/plan/design | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Scored verdict (PASS/FAIL) |\n    49→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Pass/fix loop, no score |\n    50→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Pass/fix loop, no score |"}]},"uuid":"787e2816-4a1d-463c-876c-02eb1de87206","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:59.827Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2aae25a2-f05d-447e-b054-404c1d216f3b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"787e2816-4a1d-463c-876c-02eb1de87206","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a927659a942ee7f60","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01DZLGh4SY2aEupMrRD4D3zn","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI have enough information now. Let me synthesize the research findings into a comprehensive analysis.\n\n---\n\n# Minimum Viable Feedback-to-Learning Pipeline\n\n## Research Findings: How Four Systems Close the Loop\n\n### 1. Amazon CodeGuru: Supervised Label Loop\n\n**Mechanism:** Binary signal (thumbs-up / thumbs-down) on each recommendation. Feedback becomes labels for model retraining. Repeated thumbs-down on a pattern class suppresses that detector; repeated thumbs-up amplifies it.\n\n**Key insight:** The loop is dead simple -- one bit of feedback per finding. No taxonomy, no classification. The aggregation and learning happen server-side in batch retraining. Developers never think about \"patterns\" -- they just react to individual findings.\n\n**What makes it work:**\n- Feedback is zero-friction (one click)\n- Aggregation is automated (count accept/reject per detector class)\n- The learning is invisible to the user -- detectors just get better\n\n**Limitation for Wazir:** CodeGuru's loop requires ML retraining infrastructure. Wazir's \"model\" is a prompt + expertise files, not a neural network. But the principle of \"aggregate binary signals, then act on clusters\" transfers directly.\n\n### 2. LangMem: Prompt Gradient Descent\n\n**Mechanism:** Two-phase optimization. Phase 1: an LLM reviews conversation trajectories where the agent failed, producing \"gradients\" -- natural-language descriptions of what went wrong. Phase 2: a second LLM applies those gradients to the system prompt, proposing concrete text edits.\n\n**Key insight:** The \"gradient\" is not a number -- it is a sentence like \"The agent fails to ask clarifying questions when the user's request is ambiguous.\" Multiple gradients from multiple failures get batched, and the optimizer proposes a single prompt edit that addresses the cluster.\n\n**What makes it work:**\n- Failures are captured as trajectories (conversation logs), not just outcomes\n- An LLM synthesizes the pattern -- no human taxonomy required\n- The output is a concrete prompt diff, not an abstract recommendation\n\n**Limitation for Wazir:** LangMem operates on prompt text. Wazir's reviewer context is loaded from `expertise/` files and skill definitions, which is structurally similar -- the \"prompt\" is just distributed across files. The gradient concept maps to: \"review findings cluster around X, so inject X into the reviewer's loaded expertise.\"\n\n### 3. Superpowers: Observed Rationalization TDD\n\n**Mechanism:** RED-GREEN-REFACTOR applied to process skills. RED: run the agent without the skill, observe how it fails and what rationalizations it produces. GREEN: write a skill that addresses those specific failures, including a counter-argument table mapping each observed rationalization to a rebuttal. REFACTOR: run again, observe new rationalizations, add counters, repeat until bulletproof.\n\n**Key insight:** The unit of learning is not \"the agent made an error\" but \"the agent rationalized around a constraint.\" The skill content is literally a table of excuses and rebuttals, derived from observed baseline failures.\n\n**What makes it work:**\n- You must watch the failure before writing the fix (no hypothetical skills)\n- The rationalization table is the core artifact -- it encodes the specific evasion patterns\n- Testing is continuous: new rationalizations discovered in production get added to the table\n\n**Relevance to Wazir:** This is directly applicable. Wazir already has `expertise/antipatterns/`. The missing piece is the observation-to-antipattern promotion pipeline: currently antipatterns are authored manually, not derived from accumulated review findings.\n\n### 4. Netflix Dispatch: Incident Learning with Systemic Pattern Detection\n\n**Mechanism:** Dispatch automates incident lifecycle: create Slack rooms, assemble responders, auto-generate postmortem documents with pre-filled data. After resolution, the postmortem captures action items tracked to completion. Critically, Netflix reviews across multiple postmortems to detect systemic patterns -- treating each incident in isolation hides recurring issues.\n\n**Key insight:** The magic is in cross-incident analysis. A single postmortem produces action items. Reviewing 10 postmortems reveals that 4 of them share a root cause pattern that no individual postmortem would surface.\n\n**What makes it work:**\n- Postmortem creation is automated (low friction = high completion rate)\n- Action items are tracked with deadlines and ownership\n- Periodic cross-incident review surfaces systemic patterns\n- Google's companion practice: every postmortem produces at least three action items covering detection, prevention, and mitigation\n\n**Relevance to Wazir:** The `learn` workflow already appends to `cumulative-findings.md` and checks every 5th run for antipattern candidates. This is the Netflix cross-incident pattern in embryonic form.\n\n---\n\n## What Wazir Already Has\n\nExamining the codebase, Wazir has significant infrastructure already in place:\n\n| Step | Status | Location |\n|------|--------|----------|\n| Review findings generated | Done | `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` -- full review loop with dimension sets, scoring, Codex integration |\n| Findings logged per run | Done | `.wazir/runs/<id>/reviews/` -- per-pass findings files |\n| Cumulative findings appended | Specified | `workflows/learn.md` step 3 -- append to `memory/findings/cumulative-findings.md` |\n| Antipattern trigger check | Specified | `workflows/learn.md` step 4 -- every 5th run, prompt for review |\n| Antipattern catalog | Done | `expertise/antipatterns/` -- 22+ antipatterns across 7 categories |\n| Antipatterns loaded into reviewer | Done | `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md` -- expertise files are loaded into reviewer context |\n| Learning proposal template | Done | `templates/artifacts/learning-proposal.md` and `.template.json` |\n| Learner role | Done | `roles/learner.md` |\n\n**The gap:** Steps 3 and 4 in `workflows/learn.md` are specified but there is no structured mechanism to:\n- Classify findings by pattern (so recurrences can be counted)\n- Automatically detect recurrence (the 3+ threshold)\n- Generate an antipattern draft from clustered findings\n- Validate that the new antipattern actually reduces recurrence\n\n---\n\n## Minimum Viable Feedback-to-Learning Pipeline\n\n### Design Principles (from the research)\n\n1. **CodeGuru principle:** Make feedback zero-friction. Findings already exist -- don't require extra classification effort from the reviewer.\n2. **LangMem principle:** Let an LLM synthesize the pattern. Don't require humans to manually categorize findings into antipattern buckets.\n3. **Superpowers principle:** The antipattern must be grounded in observed failures, not hypothetical ones. The rationalization table is the proof it works.\n4. **Netflix principle:** Cross-run analysis is what surfaces systemic patterns. Individual run findings are necessary but not sufficient.\n\n### The Seven-Step Loop (Revised)\n\n```\n1. CAPTURE    Review finding logged with category tag\n2. ACCUMULATE Finding appended to cumulative-findings.md  \n3. CLUSTER    Findings grouped by semantic similarity (LLM-assisted)\n4. THRESHOLD  Cluster with 3+ findings across 2+ runs triggers promotion\n5. DRAFT      Antipattern drafted from cluster evidence\n6. INJECT     Antipattern loaded into reviewer expertise\n7. VALIDATE   Finding frequency in that cluster tracked -- should decline\n```\n\n### What to Ship: Steps 1-5 (No Full System Required)\n\n**Step 1: Structured Finding Capture** (enhancement to existing review loop)\n\nAdd a `category` field to each finding in the review pass log. The reviewer already produces findings; the change is to tag each one. Categories are free-text, LLM-assigned, not from a fixed taxonomy. Example:\n\n```markdown\n### Finding F-001\n- **Severity:** HIGH\n- **Category:** async-error-handling\n- **Description:** Missing try/catch around await in fetchUser()\n- **Source:** [Internal]\n```\n\nThis is the CodeGuru principle: the signal is captured at the point of generation with near-zero extra effort.\n\n**Step 2: Cumulative Findings with Category Index** (enhancement to `workflows/learn.md` step 3)\n\nThe `learn` workflow already specifies appending to `cumulative-findings.md`. Enhance the format to preserve category tags:\n\n```markdown\n## Run run-20260320-010128 (2026-03-20)\n- [HIGH] async-error-handling: Missing try/catch around await in fetchUser()\n- [WARN] test-coverage-gap: No test for error path in payment flow\n- [HIGH] async-error-handling: Unhandled promise rejection in WebSocket handler\n```\n\n**Step 3: LLM-Assisted Clustering** (new step in `learn` workflow)\n\nAfter appending findings, the learner reads `cumulative-findings.md` and groups findings by semantic similarity. This is the LangMem gradient principle: use an LLM to find the pattern across individual instances. Output: a cluster summary appended to `memory/findings/pattern-clusters.md`:\n\n```markdown\n## Cluster: async-error-handling\n- **Finding count:** 5\n- **Across runs:** 3\n- **Representative findings:**\n  - Run X: Missing try/catch around await in fetchUser()\n  - Run Y: Unhandled promise rejection in WebSocket handler  \n  - Run Z: No error boundary around async component mount\n- **Common root cause:** AI-generated async code defaults to happy path; \n  error handling is not generated unless explicitly prompted.\n```\n\n**Step 4: Threshold-Based Promotion Trigger** (enhancement to `learn` workflow step 4)\n\nReplace the current \"every 5th run\" heuristic with a data-driven trigger:\n\n```\nIF cluster.finding_count >= 3 AND cluster.distinct_runs >= 2:\n  Output: \"Cluster '{name}' has {count} findings across {runs} runs. \n           Promote to antipattern? [Y/n]\"\n```\n\nThis requires user approval (consistent with Wazir's approval gates). The threshold is low intentionally -- three findings across two runs is enough signal to warrant codifying the pattern. False positives are caught by the approval gate.\n\n**Step 5: Antipattern Draft Generation** (new step, gated on user approval)\n\nOn approval, the learner drafts an antipattern file following the existing format in `expertise/antipatterns/`. The draft is populated from cluster evidence, following the Superpowers principle: every claim in the antipattern must trace to an observed finding, not a hypothetical scenario.\n\n```markdown\n# AP-XX: [Pattern Name]\n\n> **Domain:** [auto-detected from cluster]\n> **Severity:** [highest severity in cluster]\n> **Source:** Promoted from findings cluster, {count} occurrences across {runs} runs\n\n## What it looks like\n[Code examples drawn from actual findings]\n\n## Why AI agents do it\n[Root cause from cluster analysis]\n\n## The fix\n[Resolution pattern from findings that were successfully fixed]\n\n## Detection rule\n[Derived from the reviewer dimension that caught the findings]\n\n## Evidence chain\n- Run X finding F-001: [description]\n- Run Y finding F-003: [description]\n- Run Z finding F-007: [description]\n```\n\n### Steps 6-7: Deferred but Designed For\n\n**Step 6 (Inject)** happens automatically once the antipattern file lands in `expertise/antipatterns/`. The reviewer skill already loads expertise files. No new mechanism needed -- file system is the integration point.\n\n**Step 7 (Validate)** requires tracking finding frequency per cluster over time. This can be as simple as: after each run, count findings in each known cluster. If the count trends to zero after antipattern injection, the learning is validated. If it does not, the antipattern needs strengthening. This is valuable but not required for MVP.\n\n---\n\n## Implementation Roadmap\n\n### Phase A: Ship Steps 1-2 (minimal change, immediate value)\n\n1. Add `category` tagging guidance to the reviewer skill's finding output format\n2. Enhance `workflows/learn.md` step 3 to preserve category tags in `cumulative-findings.md`\n3. No new files, no new workflows -- just structured data in existing artifacts\n\n**Effort:** Small. Changes to `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md` finding format and `workflows/learn.md` step 3 format.\n\n### Phase B: Ship Steps 3-4 (clustering and threshold)\n\n1. Add step 3.5 to `workflows/learn.md`: \"Cluster findings by semantic similarity\"\n2. Create `memory/findings/pattern-clusters.md` as the cluster index\n3. Replace the \"every 5th run\" trigger with the threshold-based trigger\n4. Add approval gate for promotion\n\n**Effort:** Medium. New step in learn workflow, new artifact file, modified trigger logic.\n\n### Phase C: Ship Step 5 (antipattern drafting)\n\n1. Add step 5 to `workflows/learn.md`: \"Draft antipattern from approved cluster\"\n2. Template for project-specific antipatterns (lighter than the full `expertise/antipatterns/` format)\n3. File lands in `memory/antipatterns/` (project-scoped, not global expertise)\n\n**Effort:** Medium. New template, new output directory, learner role update.\n\n### Phase D: Future -- Steps 6-7 (injection and validation)\n\n1. Composition engine picks up `memory/antipatterns/` as a project-scoped expertise source\n2. Finding frequency tracking per cluster per run\n3. Decay/retirement of antipatterns that stop producing findings\n\n---\n\n## Key Design Decisions\n\n**Why free-text categories, not a fixed taxonomy?** CodeGuru and LangMem both show that rigid taxonomies break when the problem space is open-ended. Free-text categories clustered by LLM similarity are more robust. The taxonomy emerges from the data.\n\n**Why 3 findings / 2 runs as threshold?** Netflix and Google both find that cross-incident review is where systemic patterns emerge. A single run's findings might be contextual. Two runs with the same pattern is signal. Three findings is enough evidence to draft a concrete antipattern. The approval gate catches false positives.\n\n**Why project-scoped antipatterns (`memory/antipatterns/`) separate from global (`expertise/antipatterns/`)?** Project-specific patterns (e.g., \"this codebase's API client always forgets to refresh tokens\") should not pollute the global expertise library. Promotion from project to global is a separate, deliberate decision.\n\n**Why user approval at step 4, not full automation?** The Superpowers research is clear: you must observe the failure before codifying the fix. Automated promotion risks encoding noise as signal. The human gate at promotion is cheap insurance -- the automation handles everything up to that point.\n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\nThe minimum viable loop is **Steps 1-4**: structured capture, cumulative accumulation, LLM-assisted clustering, and threshold-triggered promotion with user approval. This can ship in two phases (A and B above) with changes to two existing files (`skills/reviewer/SKILL.md` and `workflows/learn.md`) plus one new artifact file (`memory/findings/pattern-clusters.md`). Steps 5-7 add value but are not required for the loop to start producing actionable learning.\n\nThe core insight across all four researched systems: **the hard part is not generating findings (Wazir already does that) or acting on patterns (the expertise system already does that). The hard part is the middle -- aggregating individual findings into named patterns. LLM-assisted clustering solves this without requiring manual taxonomy or ML retraining infrastructure.**\n\nSources:\n- [Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer FAQs](https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/faqs/)\n- [Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Features](https://aws.amazon.com/codeguru/reviewer/features/)\n- [CodeGuru Provide Feedback Documentation](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codeguru/latest/reviewer-ug/provide-feedback.html)\n- [LangChain Blog: Exploring Prompt Optimization](https://blog.langchain.com/exploring-prompt-optimization/)\n- [LangMem: How to Optimize a Prompt](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/guides/optimize_memory_prompt/)\n- [LangMem Prompt Optimization API Reference](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langmem/reference/prompt_optimization/)\n- [LangMem SDK Launch Blog Post](https://blog.langchain.com/langmem-sdk-launch/)\n- [Superpowers TDD Skill](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md)\n- [Superpowers Writing Skills](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md)\n- [Superpowers Testing Skills with Subagents](https://github.com/obra/superpowers/blob/main/skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md)\n- [Netflix TechBlog: Introducing Dispatch](https://netflixtechblog.com/introducing-dispatch-da4b8a2a8072)\n- [Netflix TechBlog: Empowering Engineers with Incident Management](https://netflixtechblog.com/empowering-netflix-engineers-with-incident-management-ebb967871de4)\n- [Google SRE: Postmortem Culture](https://sre.google/workbook/postmortem-culture/)\n- [Google SRE: Postmortem Action Items (USENIX)](https://sre.google/static/pdf/login_spring17_09_lunney.pdf)"}],"stop_reason":"end_turn","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1524,"cache_read_input_tokens":36291,"output_tokens":4239,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1524},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERgVLZHQ5NNeKNxdKH1","type":"assistant","uuid":"ae44abca-2489-4107-b733-511f1ebdb507","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:41:42.535Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}