@peakinfer/cli 1.0.133

package/templates/optimizations/quality-monitoring.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+id: quality-monitoring
+name: Quality Preservation Monitoring
+description: Monitor and maintain model quality during optimization deployments
+category: monitoring
+confidence: 0.93
+success_count: 1890
+verified_environments: 87
+contributors:
+  - ml_quality_engineer
+  - monitoring_specialist
+last_updated: "2024-12-23"
+
+environment_match:
+  optimization_deployed: true
+  quality_requirements: high
+  production: true
+
+optimization:
+  technique: quality_monitoring
+  expected_quality_retention: ">99%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    quality_incident_cost: 10000
+  projected_improvement:
+    incident_prevention_rate: 0.9
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 60
+    total_cost: 12000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Ground truth data access"
+    - requirement: "Evaluation pipeline"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: evaluation_setup
+      name: Evaluation Pipeline Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_evaluation_pipeline.py"
+        - "python scripts/configure_quality_metrics.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/verify_evaluation.py"
+        success_criteria: "pipeline_functional"
+    - step_id: monitoring
+      name: Quality Monitoring
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/enable_continuous_evaluation.py --sample-rate 0.01"
+        - "python scripts/setup_quality_alerts.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_quality_detection.py"
+        success_criteria: "detection_accuracy > 0.95"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: model_accuracy
+      target: ">baseline * 0.99"
+      alert_threshold: "<baseline * 0.95"
+    - metric: quality_drift_score
+      target: "<0.05"
+      alert_threshold: ">0.1"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "model_accuracy < baseline * 0.93 for 10 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: classification_service
+      quality_incidents_before: 5
+      quality_incidents_after: 0
+      detection_time_reduction_percent: 85

package/templates/optimizations/realtime-budget-controls.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+id: realtime-budget-controls
+name: Real-time Budget Controls
+description: Implement real-time cost controls to prevent budget overruns
+category: cost_optimization
+confidence: 0.95
+success_count: 2567
+verified_environments: 124
+contributors:
+  - finops_engineer
+  - platform_architect
+last_updated: "2024-12-27"
+
+environment_match:
+  monthly_budget: ">$10K"
+  budget_overrun_risk: high
+  cost_visibility: low
+
+optimization:
+  technique: realtime_budget_enforcement
+  expected_cost_reduction: "10-30%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    monthly_overrun_risk_percent: 20
+  projected_improvement:
+    budget_adherence: 0.99
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 60
+    total_cost: 12000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Cost tracking API access"
+    - requirement: "Alerting infrastructure"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: tracking_setup
+      name: Cost Tracking Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_cost_tracking.py --granularity hourly"
+        - "python scripts/configure_cost_alerts.py --thresholds 50,75,90,100"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/verify_tracking.py"
+        success_criteria: "tracking_active"
+    - step_id: controls_setup
+      name: Budget Controls
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/implement_rate_limiting.py --daily-limit auto"
+        - "python scripts/add_circuit_breaker.py --budget-threshold 95"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_budget_controls.py"
+        success_criteria: "controls_functional"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: budget_utilization
+      target: "80-95%"
+      alert_threshold: ">100%"
+    - metric: cost_prediction_accuracy
+      target: ">0.9"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.7"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "false_positive_rate > 10% for controls"
+      action: alert_and_tuning
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: saas_platform
+      monthly_budget: 50000
+      previous_overruns: 3
+      post_implementation_overruns: 0

package/templates/optimizations/realtime-latency-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+id: realtime-latency-optimization
+name: Real-time Latency Optimization
+description: Optimize inference for real-time applications with strict latency requirements
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.90
+success_count: 1456
+verified_environments: 67
+contributors:
+  - latency_specialist
+  - realtime_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-05"
+
+environment_match:
+  latency_requirement: "<50ms"
+  use_case:
+    - chat
+    - autocomplete
+    - real_time_translation
+
+optimization:
+  technique: latency_optimization
+  expected_latency_improvement: "50-70%"
+  effort_estimate: "2-3 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 120
+    total_cost: 24000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Profiling tools available"
+    - requirement: "Quantization support"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: latency_profiling
+      name: Latency Profiling
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/profile_inference_latency.py"
+        - "python scripts/identify_latency_bottlenecks.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_profile.py"
+        success_criteria: "bottlenecks_identified"
+    - step_id: optimization_application
+      name: Apply Latency Optimizations
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/enable_speculative_decoding.py"
+        - "python scripts/optimize_batch_size.py --target-latency 40"
+        - "python scripts/enable_kv_cache_quantization.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_latency.py"
+        success_criteria: "p95_latency < 50ms"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_latency_config.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: latency_p50
+      target: "<30ms"
+      alert_threshold: ">40ms"
+    - metric: latency_p99
+      target: "<50ms"
+      alert_threshold: ">75ms"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "latency_p99 > 100ms for 5 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: chatbot_api
+      baseline_p95_ms: 120
+      optimized_p95_ms: 42
+      latency_reduction_percent: 65

package/templates/optimizations/sglang-concurrency-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id: sglang-concurrency-optimization
+name: SGLang High-Concurrency Optimization
+description: Optimize SGLang deployment for high-concurrency structured generation workloads
+category: runtime_optimization
+confidence: 0.87
+success_count: 567
+verified_environments: 29
+contributors:
+  - sglang_specialist
+  - concurrency_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-02"
+
+environment_match:
+  use_case: structured_generation
+  concurrency: ">100"
+  output_format:
+    - json
+    - structured
+
+optimization:
+  technique: sglang_optimization
+  expected_throughput_improvement: "2-4x"
+  expected_cost_reduction: "50-70%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  projected_improvement:
+    throughput_multiplier: 3
+    cost_reduction_percent: 65
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 60
+    total_cost: 12000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "SGLang installation"
+      validation_command: "python -c 'import sglang'"
+    - requirement: "Structured output requirements"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: sglang_setup
+      name: SGLang Server Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_sglang.py --model ./model"
+        - "python scripts/configure_radix_cache.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_sglang_server.py"
+        success_criteria: "server_healthy"
+    - step_id: concurrency_tuning
+      name: Concurrency Tuning
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/tune_concurrency.py --target-concurrent 200"
+        - "python scripts/enable_prefix_sharing.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_concurrency.py"
+        success_criteria: "concurrent_requests > 150"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_sglang_config.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: concurrent_requests
+      target: ">150"
+      alert_threshold: "<100"
+    - metric: structured_output_accuracy
+      target: ">0.99"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.95"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "structured_output_accuracy < 0.9 for 5 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: api_generation_service
+      baseline_concurrency: 50
+      optimized_concurrency: 180
+      improvement_factor: 3.6

package/templates/optimizations/smart-model-routing.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+id: smart-model-routing
+name: Intelligent Model Routing for Cost-Optimized Task Execution
+description: Route different task types to appropriately-sized models instead of using premium models for everything
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.92
+success_count: 1567
+verified_environments: 78
+contributors:
+  - app_architect
+  - cost_optimizer
+  - routing_specialist
+last_updated: "2025-01-16"
+
+environment_match:
+  task_variety: mixed
+  model_usage: single_premium_model
+  monthly_api_cost: ">$20K"
+  task_complexity: variable
+
+optimization:
+  technique: smart_model_routing
+  expected_cost_reduction: "60-80%"
+  expected_quality_retention: ">95%"
+  effort_estimate: "2-3 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    premium_model_cost_per_token: 0.03
+    current_avg_tokens_per_task: 200
+  projected_improvement:
+    extraction_cost_per_token: 0.003
+    qa_cost_per_token: 0.01
+    generation_cost_per_token: 0.03
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 160
+    total_cost: 32000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Task classification capability"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/test_classifier.py --accuracy-threshold 0.95"
+    - requirement: "Multiple model access"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/test_model_access.py --models claude-haiku,gpt-4o-mini,gpt-4o"
+    - requirement: "Request routing infrastructure"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/test_routing.py"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: task_classification_setup
+      name: Task Classification
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_task_classifier.py --tasks extraction,qa,summarization,generation"
+        - "python scripts/train_routing_model.py --training-data task_examples.json --accuracy-target 0.95"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_classifier.py --test-data validation_tasks.json"
+        success_criteria: "accuracy > 0.95 AND precision > 0.93 AND recall > 0.93"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/disable_classification.py"
+    - step_id: routing_configuration
+      name: Model Routing Logic
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/configure_model_routing.py --extraction claude-haiku --qa gpt-4o-mini --generation gpt-4o"
+        - "python scripts/implement_fallback_logic.py --quality-threshold 0.9 --fallback-model gpt-4o"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_routing_logic.py --sample-tasks 100"
+        success_criteria: "routing_accuracy > 0.95 AND fallback_rate < 0.1"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_to_single_model.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: routing_accuracy
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.93"
+    - metric: cost_per_task
+      target: "<baseline * 0.4"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.6"
+    - metric: task_quality_score
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.93"
+    - metric: fallback_rate
+      target: "<0.1"
+      alert_threshold: ">0.15"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "routing_accuracy < 0.9 for 30 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+    - condition: "task_quality_score < 0.9 for 3 consecutive measurements"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: document_processing_saas
+      baseline_monthly_cost: 45000
+      optimized_monthly_cost: 12000
+      cost_reduction_percent: 73.3
+      quality_retention: 97.1
+      implementation_days: 16

package/templates/optimizations/streaming-batch-selection.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+id: streaming-batch-selection
+name: Streaming vs Batch Pattern Selection Framework
+description: Choose optimal API pattern based on latency, cost, and UX requirements
+category: api_optimization
+confidence: 0.90
+success_count: 1456
+verified_environments: 78
+contributors:
+  - inference_squeeze
+  - ux_engineer
+  - api_architect
+last_updated: "2025-01-20"
+source: "Inference Squeeze Chapter 3 - Request Patterns"
+
+environment_match:
+  application_type: mixed
+  latency_requirements: variable
+  user_experience: critical
+  cost_sensitivity: high
+
+optimization:
+  technique: pattern_optimization
+  expected_ux_improvement: "30-50%"
+  expected_cost_optimization: "20-40%"
+  effort_estimate: "1 week"
+  risk_level: low
+
+decision_framework:
+  use_streaming_when:
+    - "User-facing interactive applications"
+    - "First-token latency matters more than total latency"
+    - "Long responses (>500 tokens)"
+    - "User expects real-time feedback"
+  use_batch_when:
+    - "Background processing"
+    - "API offers batch pricing discount (OpenAI: 50%)"
+    - "Latency tolerance >24 hours"
+    - "High volume, consistent workloads"
+  use_sync_when:
+    - "Simple queries, short responses"
+    - "Strict latency SLAs"
+    - "Integration constraints require sync"
+
+pattern_comparison:
+  streaming:
+    first_token_latency: "200-500ms"
+    total_latency: variable
+    cost_modifier: "1.0x"
+    ux_benefit: "High - perceived responsiveness"
+    implementation: "WebSocket or SSE"
+  synchronous:
+    first_token_latency: "N/A"
+    total_latency: "500-5000ms"
+    cost_modifier: "1.0x"
+    ux_benefit: "Medium - simple integration"
+    implementation: "REST API"
+  batch:
+    first_token_latency: "N/A"
+    total_latency: "minutes to 24 hours"
+    cost_modifier: "0.5x (OpenAI)"
+    ux_benefit: "Low - async only"
+    implementation: "Job queue + polling"
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    monthly_requests: 100000
+    avg_cost_per_request: 0.05
+    monthly_cost: 5000
+  projected_improvement:
+    batch_eligible_percentage: 0.40
+    batch_discount: 0.50
+    streaming_improvement: 0.0
+    new_monthly_cost: 4000
+    monthly_savings: 1000
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 40
+    total_cost: 8000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "WebSocket/SSE infrastructure"
+      validation: "Can handle streaming connections"
+    - requirement: "Job queue system"
+      validation: "Can process async batch jobs"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: endpoint_audit
+      name: Audit Endpoint Requirements
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "List all LLM-calling endpoints"
+        - "Categorize by latency requirement"
+        - "Identify batch-eligible workloads"
+      validation:
+        command: "Endpoint audit complete"
+        success_criteria: "all_endpoints_categorized"
+        rollback_command: "Continue with current patterns"
+    - step_id: pattern_assignment
+      name: Assign Patterns to Endpoints
+      executable: true
+      matrix:
+        real_time_chat: streaming
+        document_processing: batch
+        search_results: sync
+        bulk_analysis: batch
+        code_completion: streaming
+        content_moderation: sync_or_batch
+      validation:
+        command: "Validate pattern assignments"
+        success_criteria: "patterns_assigned AND no_conflicts"
+        rollback_command: "Revert to uniform pattern"
+    - step_id: streaming_implementation
+      name: Implement Streaming for Interactive Endpoints
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Add SSE/WebSocket support for chat endpoints"
+        - "Implement token-by-token rendering"
+        - "Handle connection lifecycle"
+      validation:
+        command: "Test streaming endpoints"
+        success_criteria: "first_token_latency < 500ms"
+        rollback_command: "Disable streaming"
+    - step_id: batch_implementation
+      name: Implement Batch for Background Workloads
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Queue async workloads for batch API"
+        - "Implement job status tracking"
+        - "Handle batch result retrieval"
+      validation:
+        command: "Test batch processing"
+        success_criteria: "batch_cost_savings > 40%"
+        rollback_command: "Revert to sync processing"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: first_token_latency_p50
+      target: "<300ms"
+      alert_threshold: ">500ms"
+    - metric: batch_utilization_rate
+      target: ">60%"
+      alert_threshold: "<40%"
+    - metric: pattern_cost_efficiency
+      target: ">0.7"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.5"
+    - metric: streaming_connection_success_rate
+      target: ">99%"
+      alert_threshold: "<95%"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "first_token_latency_p50 > 1000ms for 15 minutes"
+      action: investigate_streaming_issues
+    - condition: "batch_utilization_rate < 30% for 1 hour"
+      action: review_batch_eligibility
+
+results:
+  case_study:
+    environment: AI writing assistant
+    before:
+      all_sync: true
+      avg_time_to_first_word: "2.3s"
+      monthly_cost: 45000
+    after:
+      streaming_for_interactive: true
+      batch_for_background: true
+      avg_time_to_first_word: "0.4s"
+      monthly_cost: 31500
+      cost_reduction: "30%"
+      ux_improvement: "83% faster first response"

package/templates/optimizations/system-prompt-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+id: system-prompt-optimization
+name: Redundant System Prompt Optimization
+description: Reduce system prompt token costs through caching and optimization
+category: cost_optimization
+confidence: 0.91
+success_count: 1890
+verified_environments: 89
+contributors:
+  - prompt_engineer
+  - token_optimizer
+last_updated: "2024-12-30"
+
+environment_match:
+  system_prompt_length: ">500 tokens"
+  request_volume: ">10K/day"
+  system_prompt_repetition: high
+
+optimization:
+  technique: system_prompt_caching
+  expected_cost_reduction: "15-30%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 days"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    system_tokens_per_request: 800
+    daily_requests: 50000
+  projected_improvement:
+    cached_token_savings_percent: 25
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 12
+    total_cost: 2400
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Prompt caching support (Anthropic/OpenAI)"
+    - requirement: "Stable system prompt"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: prompt_analysis
+      name: System Prompt Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_system_prompts.py"
+        - "python scripts/identify_cacheable_content.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "cacheable_tokens > 400"
+    - step_id: caching_setup
+      name: Prompt Caching Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/enable_prompt_caching.py"
+        - "python scripts/optimize_prompt_structure.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/verify_caching.py"
+        success_criteria: "cache_hit_rate > 0.9"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: cache_hit_rate
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.8"
+    - metric: input_token_cost
+      target: "<baseline * 0.75"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.9"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "cache_hit_rate < 0.5 for 10 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_investigation
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: chatbot_service
+      baseline_token_cost_daily: 500
+      optimized_token_cost_daily: 375
+      cost_reduction_percent: 25