@peakinfer/cli 1.0.133

package/templates/optimizations/context-window-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+id: context-window-optimization
+name: Context Window Optimization and Sliding Windows
+description: Reduce context costs through intelligent windowing without losing relevant information
+category: memory_optimization
+confidence: 0.88
+success_count: 1234
+verified_environments: 56
+contributors:
+  - context_specialist
+  - memory_optimizer
+  - nlp_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-12"
+
+environment_match:
+  avg_context_length: ">4000 tokens"
+  context_growth_pattern: accumulating
+  task_type:
+    - chat
+    - document_qa
+    - summarization
+
+optimization:
+  technique: sliding_window_context
+  expected_cost_reduction: "40-60%"
+  expected_quality_retention: ">95%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    avg_tokens_per_request: 8000
+    cost_per_1k_tokens: 0.03
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_tokens_per_request: 3200
+    cost_reduction_percent: 60
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 60
+    total_cost: 12000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Context tracking capability"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/test_context_tracking.py"
+    - requirement: "Relevance scoring model"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/test_relevance_model.py"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: context_analysis
+      name: Context Usage Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_context_patterns.py --logs ./request_logs"
+        - "python scripts/identify_redundancy.py --output context_report.json"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "analysis_complete"
+    - step_id: window_implementation
+      name: Sliding Window Implementation
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/implement_sliding_window.py --max-tokens 4000 --overlap 500"
+        - "python scripts/setup_relevance_filter.py --threshold 0.7"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_window_quality.py"
+        success_criteria: "quality_score > 0.95"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_context_handling.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: avg_context_tokens
+      target: "<4000"
+      alert_threshold: ">6000"
+    - metric: response_quality
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.93"
+    - metric: context_miss_rate
+      target: "<0.05"
+      alert_threshold: ">0.1"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "response_quality < 0.9 for 10 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+    - condition: "context_miss_rate > 0.15 for 5 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_investigation
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: customer_support_chat
+      baseline_avg_tokens: 12000
+      optimized_avg_tokens: 4500
+      cost_reduction_percent: 62.5
+      quality_retention: 96.8
+      implementation_days: 10

package/templates/optimizations/cost-sensitive-batch-processing.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+id: cost-sensitive-batch-processing
+name: Cost-Sensitive Batch Processing
+description: Optimize batch processing for maximum cost efficiency with flexible latency
+category: cost_optimization
+confidence: 0.92
+success_count: 1678
+verified_environments: 82
+contributors:
+  - batch_processing_expert
+  - cost_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-04"
+
+environment_match:
+  workload_type: batch
+  latency_flexibility: high
+  monthly_cost: ">$10K"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: batch_cost_optimization
+  expected_cost_reduction: "50-70%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-2 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    cost_per_request: 0.01
+    daily_requests: 100000
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_cost_per_request: 0.003
+    cost_reduction_percent: 70
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 60
+    total_cost: 12000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Queue infrastructure"
+    - requirement: "Batch-capable API access"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: batch_analysis
+      name: Workload Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_request_patterns.py"
+        - "python scripts/identify_batch_opportunities.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "batch_potential > 0.6"
+    - step_id: batch_implementation
+      name: Batch Processing Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_request_queue.py --max-wait 5s --max-batch 32"
+        - "python scripts/configure_dynamic_batching.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_batch.py"
+        success_criteria: "cost_reduction > 0.5"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_to_single_request.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: cost_per_request
+      target: "<baseline * 0.4"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.6"
+    - metric: batch_efficiency
+      target: ">0.8"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.5"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "queue_latency > 30s for 10 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_investigation
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: document_processing
+      baseline_cost_per_1k: 10
+      optimized_cost_per_1k: 3.2
+      cost_reduction_percent: 68

package/templates/optimizations/distributed-training-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+id: distributed-training-optimization
+name: Distributed Training Cost Optimization
+description: Optimize distributed training costs through efficient parallelization strategies
+category: scaling
+confidence: 0.84
+success_count: 345
+verified_environments: 23
+contributors:
+  - distributed_systems_engineer
+  - training_specialist
+last_updated: "2025-01-06"
+
+environment_match:
+  model_size: ">30B"
+  gpu_count: ">4"
+  training_budget: ">$50K"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: distributed_training_optimization
+  expected_cost_reduction: "30-50%"
+  effort_estimate: "4-6 weeks"
+  risk_level: high
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    gpu_hours_per_epoch: 1000
+    cost_per_gpu_hour: 3.0
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_gpu_hours: 600
+    cost_reduction_percent: 40
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 320
+    total_cost: 64000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Multi-GPU cluster access"
+    - requirement: "DeepSpeed or FSDP setup"
+    - requirement: "High-bandwidth interconnect"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: parallelization_strategy
+      name: Parallelization Strategy
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_model_for_parallelism.py"
+        - "python scripts/configure_deepspeed.py --stage 3"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_distributed.py"
+        success_criteria: "scaling_efficiency > 0.8"
+    - step_id: gradient_optimization
+      name: Gradient Optimization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/enable_gradient_checkpointing.py"
+        - "python scripts/configure_mixed_precision.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_training.py"
+        success_criteria: "throughput > baseline * 1.5"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: gpu_utilization
+      target: ">85%"
+      alert_threshold: "<70%"
+    - metric: scaling_efficiency
+      target: ">0.8"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.6"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "scaling_efficiency < 0.5 for 30 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_investigation
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: llm_fine_tuning
+      baseline_cost: 120000
+      optimized_cost: 72000
+      cost_reduction_percent: 40

package/templates/optimizations/document-analysis-edge.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+id: document-analysis-edge
+name: Document Analysis Edge Deployment
+description: Deploy document analysis models to edge for reduced latency and cost
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.85
+success_count: 678
+verified_environments: 34
+contributors:
+  - edge_specialist
+  - document_ai_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-09"
+
+environment_match:
+  use_case: document_analysis
+  latency_requirement: "<100ms"
+  privacy_requirement: high
+
+optimization:
+  technique: edge_deployment
+  expected_latency_improvement: "80-90%"
+  expected_cost_reduction: "40-60%"
+  effort_estimate: "3-4 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    cloud_cost_per_request: 0.02
+  projected_improvement:
+    edge_cost_per_request: 0.008
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 200
+    total_cost: 40000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Edge hardware with 8GB+ memory"
+    - requirement: "Quantized model availability"
+    - requirement: "ONNX or TensorRT runtime"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: model_optimization
+      name: Model Optimization for Edge
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/quantize_for_edge.py --model ./model --target int8"
+        - "python scripts/convert_to_onnx.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_edge_model.py"
+        success_criteria: "quality > 0.93 AND size < 500MB"
+    - step_id: edge_deployment
+      name: Edge Deployment
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/deploy_to_edge.py --model ./optimized_model"
+        - "python scripts/setup_edge_routing.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_edge_latency.py"
+        success_criteria: "latency_p95 < 100ms"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/fallback_to_cloud.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: edge_latency_p95
+      target: "<100ms"
+      alert_threshold: ">150ms"
+    - metric: accuracy
+      target: ">0.93"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.90"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "accuracy < 0.88 for 5 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: invoice_processing
+      cloud_latency_ms: 850
+      edge_latency_ms: 75
+      latency_reduction_percent: 91.2

package/templates/optimizations/document-pipeline-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id: document-pipeline-optimization
+name: Document Processing Pipeline Optimization
+description: Optimize end-to-end document processing pipelines for cost and throughput
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.89
+success_count: 987
+verified_environments: 47
+contributors:
+  - pipeline_architect
+  - document_specialist
+last_updated: "2024-12-28"
+
+environment_match:
+  use_case: document_processing
+  pipeline_stages: ">3"
+  monthly_documents: ">10K"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: pipeline_optimization
+  expected_cost_reduction: "40-60%"
+  expected_throughput_improvement: "2-3x"
+  effort_estimate: "2-4 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    cost_per_document: 0.50
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_cost_per_document: 0.20
+    cost_reduction_percent: 60
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 160
+    total_cost: 32000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Pipeline orchestration capability"
+    - requirement: "Stage-level metrics"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: pipeline_analysis
+      name: Pipeline Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_pipeline_stages.py"
+        - "python scripts/identify_bottlenecks.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "bottlenecks_identified"
+    - step_id: optimization
+      name: Pipeline Optimization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/parallelize_stages.py"
+        - "python scripts/add_smart_routing.py"
+        - "python scripts/enable_caching.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_pipeline.py"
+        success_criteria: "throughput > baseline * 2"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_pipeline.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: documents_per_hour
+      target: ">baseline * 2"
+      alert_threshold: "<baseline"
+    - metric: cost_per_document
+      target: "<baseline * 0.5"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.7"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "pipeline_error_rate > 5% for 15 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: invoice_processing
+      baseline_throughput: 100
+      optimized_throughput: 280
+      cost_reduction_percent: 55

package/templates/optimizations/domain-specific-distillation.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id: domain-specific-distillation
+name: Model Distillation for Domain-Specific Tasks
+description: Distill large models into smaller, domain-specific models for cost-efficient deployment
+category: memory_optimization
+confidence: 0.85
+success_count: 423
+verified_environments: 26
+contributors:
+  - distillation_expert
+  - domain_specialist
+last_updated: "2025-01-01"
+
+environment_match:
+  task_specificity: high
+  model_size: ">7B"
+  quality_requirement: ">90%"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: knowledge_distillation
+  expected_cost_reduction: "70-85%"
+  expected_quality_retention: ">95%"
+  effort_estimate: "4-6 weeks"
+  risk_level: high
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    teacher_model_cost: 0.03
+  projected_improvement:
+    student_model_cost: 0.005
+    cost_reduction_percent: 83
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 300
+    compute_hours: 500
+    total_cost: 75000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Domain-specific training data"
+    - requirement: "Teacher model access"
+    - requirement: "Sufficient compute for distillation"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: data_preparation
+      name: Training Data Preparation
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/prepare_distillation_data.py --domain ./domain_data"
+        - "python scripts/generate_teacher_outputs.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_data.py"
+        success_criteria: "data_quality > 0.95"
+    - step_id: distillation
+      name: Model Distillation
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/train_student_model.py --teacher ./teacher --student ./student"
+        - "python scripts/evaluate_student.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/compare_quality.py"
+        success_criteria: "student_quality > teacher_quality * 0.95"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: task_accuracy
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.90"
+    - metric: inference_cost
+      target: "<baseline * 0.2"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.3"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "task_accuracy < 0.88 for any evaluation"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: legal_document_classification
+      teacher_accuracy: 0.96
+      student_accuracy: 0.94
+      cost_reduction_percent: 85

package/templates/optimizations/error-handling-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+id: error-handling-optimization
+name: Exponential Backoff and Error Handling Optimization
+description: Optimize retry logic to reduce wasted API calls and improve reliability
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.94
+success_count: 2123
+verified_environments: 98
+contributors:
+  - reliability_engineer
+  - api_specialist
+last_updated: "2024-12-29"
+
+environment_match:
+  error_rate: ">1%"
+  retry_strategy: "fixed or none"
+  api_cost_sensitivity: high
+
+optimization:
+  technique: intelligent_retry
+  expected_cost_reduction: "10-25%"
+  effort_estimate: "3-5 days"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    wasted_retry_percent: 15
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_retry_success_rate: 0.95
+    cost_reduction_percent: 18
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 24
+    total_cost: 4800
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Error logging infrastructure"
+    - requirement: "Retry configuration access"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: error_analysis
+      name: Error Pattern Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_error_patterns.py --logs ./error_logs"
+        - "python scripts/classify_error_types.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "patterns_identified"
+    - step_id: retry_optimization
+      name: Retry Strategy Optimization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/implement_exponential_backoff.py --base 1 --max 60"
+        - "python scripts/add_circuit_breaker.py --threshold 5 --timeout 30"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_retry_logic.py"
+        success_criteria: "retry_success_rate > 0.9"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_retry_config.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: retry_success_rate
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.8"
+    - metric: circuit_breaker_trips
+      target: "<5/hour"
+      alert_threshold: ">20/hour"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "retry_success_rate < 0.7 for 10 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: api_gateway
+      baseline_wasted_calls_percent: 18
+      optimized_wasted_calls_percent: 4
+      cost_reduction_percent: 14

package/templates/optimizations/gptq-4bit-quantization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+id: gptq-4bit-quantization
+name: Production 4-bit Quantization with GPTQ
+description: Implement aggressive 4-bit quantization while maintaining 95%+ quality
+category: memory_optimization
+confidence: 0.89
+success_count: 1456
+verified_environments: 54
+contributors:
+  - quantization_expert
+  - model_optimizer
+  - quality_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-13"
+
+environment_match:
+  model_size:
+    - 7B
+    - 13B
+    - 30B
+  memory_pressure: high
+  quality_tolerance: ">92%"
+  deployment:
+    - cloud
+    - edge
+
+optimization:
+  technique: 4bit_quantization
+  expected_memory_reduction: "75%"
+  expected_quality_retention: "95-98%"
+  effort_estimate: "1 week"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    model_memory_gb_formula: "model_parameters_b * 2 / 1000"
+  projected_improvement:
+    quantized_memory_reduction: 0.25
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 40
+    compute_hours: 8
+    total_cost: 8800
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "auto-gptq 0.5.0+"
+      validation_command: "python -c 'import auto_gptq; print(auto_gptq.__version__)'"
+    - requirement: "transformers 4.35+"
+      validation_command: "python -c 'import transformers; print(transformers.__version__)'"
+    - requirement: "Calibration dataset"
+      validation_command: "test -f calibration.json && python scripts/validate_calibration.py"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: model_preparation
+      name: Model Preparation
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/prepare_model.py --model-name meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf --cache-dir ./models"
+        - "python scripts/prepare_calibration.py --dataset-size 1024 --output calibration.json"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_preparation.py"
+        success_criteria: "model_loaded AND calibration_valid"
+        rollback_command: "rm -rf ./models ./calibration.json"
+    - step_id: quantization_process
+      name: GPTQ Quantization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/quantize_gptq.py --model ./models --calibration calibration.json --bits 4 --group-size 128"
+        - "python scripts/validate_quantized.py --original ./models --quantized ./quantized_model"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/quality_check.py --threshold 0.95"
+        success_criteria: "quality_score > 0.95"
+        rollback_command: "rm -rf ./quantized_model"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: memory_usage_gb
+      target: "<baseline * 0.3"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.4"
+    - metric: quality_score
+      target: ">0.95"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.93"
+    - metric: inference_latency
+      target: "<baseline * 0.8"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 1.2"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "quality_score < 0.93 for 3 consecutive measurements"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+    - condition: "memory_usage > baseline * 0.5 for 15 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: financial_document_analysis
+      baseline_memory_gb: 28
+      optimized_memory_gb: 7
+      memory_reduction_percent: 75
+      quality_retention_percent: 96.2
+      implementation_days: 5