@peakinfer/cli 1.0.133

package/templates/optimizations/long-context-memory-management.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+id: long-context-memory-management
+name: Long Context Memory Management
+description: Optimize memory usage for long-context inference with KV cache management
+category: memory_optimization
+confidence: 0.88
+success_count: 892
+verified_environments: 41
+contributors:
+  - memory_specialist
+  - llm_engineer
+last_updated: "2025-01-07"
+
+environment_match:
+  context_length: ">16K tokens"
+  memory_pressure: high
+  use_case:
+    - document_qa
+    - long_form_generation
+
+optimization:
+  technique: kv_cache_optimization
+  expected_memory_reduction: "40-60%"
+  expected_throughput_improvement: "2-3x"
+  effort_estimate: "2-3 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  projected_improvement:
+    memory_reduction_percent: 50
+    batch_size_increase: 2
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 100
+    total_cost: 20000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "PagedAttention support"
+      validation_command: "python scripts/check_paged_attention.py"
+    - requirement: "Sufficient swap space"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: kv_cache_analysis
+      name: KV Cache Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_kv_cache_usage.py"
+        - "python scripts/identify_cache_patterns.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "analysis_complete"
+    - step_id: cache_optimization
+      name: KV Cache Optimization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/enable_paged_attention.py"
+        - "python scripts/configure_cache_offloading.py --swap-size 8GB"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_memory.py"
+        success_criteria: "memory_reduction > 0.4"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/disable_cache_optimization.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: kv_cache_memory_gb
+      target: "<baseline * 0.6"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline * 0.8"
+    - metric: cache_hit_rate
+      target: ">0.9"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.7"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "cache_hit_rate < 0.5 for 10 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: legal_document_analysis
+      baseline_memory_gb: 48
+      optimized_memory_gb: 22
+      memory_reduction_percent: 54.2

package/templates/optimizations/max-tokens-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+id: max-tokens-optimization
+name: Max Tokens Configuration Optimization
+description: Optimize max_tokens settings to reduce wasted output token capacity
+category: cost_optimization
+confidence: 0.93
+success_count: 2345
+verified_environments: 112
+contributors:
+  - token_optimizer
+  - cost_analyst
+last_updated: "2024-12-31"
+
+environment_match:
+  max_tokens_setting: ">1000"
+  avg_output_tokens: "<max_tokens * 0.3"
+  monthly_cost: ">$5K"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: max_tokens_right_sizing
+  expected_cost_reduction: "20-40%"
+  effort_estimate: "1-3 days"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    wasted_token_capacity_percent: 70
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_waste_percent: 20
+    cost_reduction_percent: 30
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 16
+    total_cost: 3200
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Output length analytics"
+    - requirement: "API configuration access"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: analysis
+      name: Output Length Analysis
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/analyze_output_lengths.py --logs ./request_logs"
+        - "python scripts/calculate_optimal_max_tokens.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_analysis.py"
+        success_criteria: "analysis_complete"
+    - step_id: configuration
+      name: Max Tokens Configuration
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/configure_dynamic_max_tokens.py --percentile 95"
+        - "python scripts/add_overflow_handling.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_configuration.py"
+        success_criteria: "truncation_rate < 0.01"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_max_tokens.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: truncation_rate
+      target: "<0.01"
+      alert_threshold: ">0.05"
+    - metric: token_efficiency
+      target: ">0.8"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.5"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "truncation_rate > 0.1 for 5 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: content_generation
+      baseline_max_tokens: 2000
+      optimized_max_tokens: 650
+      cost_reduction_percent: 28

package/templates/optimizations/memory-bandwidth-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+id: memory-bandwidth-optimization
+name: Memory Bandwidth Optimization for Large Models
+description: Optimize memory access patterns for memory-bound large model inference
+category: memory_optimization
+confidence: 0.87
+success_count: 987
+verified_environments: 43
+contributors:
+  - gpu_specialist
+  - memory_optimizer
+last_updated: "2025-01-11"
+
+environment_match:
+  model_size: ">13B"
+  gpu_memory_utilization: ">80%"
+  compute_utilization: "<50%"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: memory_bandwidth_optimization
+  expected_throughput_improvement: "2-3x"
+  expected_latency_improvement: "30-50%"
+  effort_estimate: "2-3 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 120
+    total_cost: 24000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "CUDA profiler access"
+      validation_command: "which nvprof || which nsys"
+    - requirement: "Model profiling capability"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: profiling
+      name: Memory Access Profiling
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/profile_memory_access.py --model ./model"
+        - "python scripts/identify_bottlenecks.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_profile.py"
+        success_criteria: "profile_complete"
+    - step_id: optimization
+      name: Apply Memory Optimizations
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/optimize_memory_layout.py"
+        - "python scripts/enable_flash_attention.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/benchmark_memory.py"
+        success_criteria: "bandwidth_improvement > 1.5"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/revert_memory_config.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: memory_bandwidth_utilization
+      target: ">70%"
+      alert_threshold: "<50%"
+    - metric: inference_latency
+      target: "<baseline * 0.7"
+      alert_threshold: ">baseline"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "latency > baseline * 1.2 for 10 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: large_model_inference
+      baseline_latency_ms: 450
+      optimized_latency_ms: 280
+      improvement_percent: 37.8

package/templates/optimizations/multi-framework-resilience.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+id: multi-framework-resilience
+name: Multi-Framework Resilience Architecture
+description: Build resilient inference architecture with multiple framework fallbacks
+category: application_optimization
+confidence: 0.86
+success_count: 456
+verified_environments: 28
+contributors:
+  - reliability_engineer
+  - platform_architect
+last_updated: "2025-01-08"
+
+environment_match:
+  availability_requirement: ">99.9%"
+  single_framework: true
+  traffic: ">100K requests/day"
+
+optimization:
+  technique: multi_framework_resilience
+  expected_cost_reduction: "10-20%"
+  effort_estimate: "3-4 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  projected_improvement:
+    availability_improvement: 0.999
+    downtime_cost_savings_monthly: 15000
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 240
+    total_cost: 48000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Multiple inference backends available"
+    - requirement: "Health check infrastructure"
+    - requirement: "Load balancer with health-aware routing"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: backend_setup
+      name: Setup Multiple Backends
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_vllm_backend.py"
+        - "python scripts/setup_tgi_backend.py"
+        - "python scripts/setup_onnx_backend.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/verify_all_backends.py"
+        success_criteria: "all_backends_healthy"
+    - step_id: routing_setup
+      name: Health-Aware Routing
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/configure_health_checks.py --interval 5s"
+        - "python scripts/setup_failover_routing.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_failover.py"
+        success_criteria: "failover_time < 5s"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: availability
+      target: ">99.9%"
+      alert_threshold: "<99.5%"
+    - metric: failover_time
+      target: "<5s"
+      alert_threshold: ">15s"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "availability < 99% for 5 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_investigation
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: critical_api_service
+      baseline_availability: 99.5
+      optimized_availability: 99.95
+      monthly_downtime_reduction_hours: 3.5

package/templates/optimizations/multi-tenant-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+id: multi-tenant-optimization
+name: Multi-Tenant Cost Allocation
+description: Optimize multi-tenant AI deployments with fair cost allocation and isolation
+category: cost_optimization
+confidence: 0.88
+success_count: 678
+verified_environments: 35
+contributors:
+  - multi_tenant_architect
+  - cost_analyst
+last_updated: "2024-12-26"
+
+environment_match:
+  deployment_type: multi_tenant
+  tenant_count: ">10"
+  cost_attribution_requirement: high
+
+optimization:
+  technique: tenant_cost_optimization
+  expected_cost_reduction: "20-40%"
+  effort_estimate: "3-4 weeks"
+  risk_level: medium
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    shared_resource_waste_percent: 30
+  projected_improvement:
+    optimized_utilization: 0.85
+    cost_reduction_percent: 30
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 180
+    total_cost: 36000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Tenant identification in requests"
+    - requirement: "Per-tenant metrics capability"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: attribution_setup
+      name: Cost Attribution Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/setup_tenant_tracking.py"
+        - "python scripts/configure_cost_allocation.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/verify_attribution.py"
+        success_criteria: "attribution_accuracy > 0.98"
+    - step_id: optimization
+      name: Tenant Optimization
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/implement_tenant_quotas.py"
+        - "python scripts/enable_tenant_autoscaling.py"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/test_tenant_isolation.py"
+        success_criteria: "isolation_verified"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: tenant_attribution_accuracy
+      target: ">0.99"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.95"
+    - metric: noisy_neighbor_incidents
+      target: "<1/week"
+      alert_threshold: ">5/day"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "tenant_isolation_breach detected"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: saas_ai_platform
+      tenant_count: 50
+      baseline_cost_per_tenant: 800
+      optimized_cost_per_tenant: 560

package/templates/optimizations/prompt-caching-optimization.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+id: prompt-caching-optimization
+name: Prompt Caching for Repetitive Workloads
+description: Reduce API costs by 50-90% through intelligent prompt caching
+category: api_optimization
+confidence: 0.92
+success_count: 1678
+verified_environments: 89
+contributors:
+  - inference_squeeze
+  - cache_engineer
+  - api_optimizer
+last_updated: "2025-01-20"
+source: "Inference Squeeze Chapter 4 - Prompt Optimization"
+
+environment_match:
+  system_prompt_usage: static_repetitive
+  prompt_patterns: templated
+  request_volume: ">10K/day"
+  cache_infrastructure: available
+
+optimization:
+  technique: prompt_caching
+  expected_cost_reduction: "50-90%"
+  expected_latency_improvement: "40-60%"
+  effort_estimate: "1 week"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    system_prompt_tokens: 1500
+    daily_requests: 50000
+    daily_system_prompt_tokens: 75000000
+    cost_per_input_token: 0.000015
+    daily_system_prompt_cost: 1125
+  projected_improvement:
+    cache_hit_rate: 0.95
+    cached_token_cost: 0.0000015
+    new_daily_cost: 118
+    monthly_savings: 30210
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 40
+    total_cost: 8000
+
+caching_strategies:
+  provider_native:
+    anthropic:
+      feature: "Prompt Caching"
+      discount: "90% on cached tokens"
+      cache_duration: "5 minutes"
+      min_tokens: 1024
+    openai:
+      feature: "Automatic caching on gpt-4o, o1"
+      discount: "50% on cached tokens"
+      cache_duration: "5-10 minutes"
+      min_tokens: 1024
+  application_level:
+    semantic_cache:
+      description: "Cache responses for semantically similar queries"
+      similarity_threshold: 0.95
+      storage: "Vector database (Pinecone, Weaviate)"
+      ttl: "24 hours"
+    exact_match:
+      description: "Cache exact query-response pairs"
+      storage: "Redis, Memcached"
+      ttl: "1-24 hours"
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Static system prompts"
+      validation: "System prompts don't change per-request"
+    - requirement: "Sufficient prompt length"
+      validation: "System prompt >= 1024 tokens for provider caching"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: prompt_analysis
+      name: Analyze Prompt Patterns
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Identify static vs dynamic prompt components"
+        - "Measure system prompt token counts"
+        - "Calculate cache hit potential"
+      validation:
+        command: "Prompt analysis complete"
+        success_criteria: "static_components_identified AND cache_potential > 50%"
+        rollback_command: "Skip caching optimization"
+    - step_id: provider_native_caching
+      name: Enable Provider Native Caching
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Enable Anthropic prompt caching (if using Claude)"
+        - "Structure prompts with static prefix >= 1024 tokens"
+        - "Verify cache headers in responses"
+      validation:
+        command: "Check cache hit rate in API responses"
+        success_criteria: "cache_hit_rate > 80%"
+        rollback_command: "Disable prompt caching"
+    - step_id: application_cache
+      name: Implement Application-Level Cache
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Deploy semantic similarity cache (optional)"
+        - "Configure embedding model for queries"
+        - "Set similarity thresholds and TTL"
+      validation:
+        command: "Test cache hit rates"
+        success_criteria: "semantic_cache_hit_rate > 30%"
+        rollback_command: "Disable application cache"
+    - step_id: monitoring_setup
+      name: Cache Monitoring
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "Track cache hit rates by endpoint"
+        - "Monitor cache staleness"
+        - "Alert on cache performance degradation"
+      validation:
+        command: "Verify monitoring dashboards"
+        success_criteria: "metrics_visible AND alerts_configured"
+        rollback_command: "Continue without monitoring"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: cache_hit_rate
+      target: ">90%"
+      alert_threshold: "<70%"
+    - metric: cache_cost_savings
+      target: ">60%"
+      alert_threshold: "<40%"
+    - metric: cache_staleness_rate
+      target: "<5%"
+      alert_threshold: ">15%"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "cache_hit_rate < 50% for 1 hour"
+      action: investigate_cache_invalidation
+    - condition: "cache_staleness_rate > 20% for 30 minutes"
+      action: reduce_cache_ttl
+
+results:
+  case_study:
+    environment: Legal document analysis
+    system_prompt_tokens: 2200
+    daily_requests: 75000
+    baseline_daily_cost: 2475
+    optimized_daily_cost: 371
+    cost_reduction_percent: 85

package/templates/optimizations/pytorch-to-onnx-migration.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+id: pytorch-to-onnx-migration
+name: PyTorch to ONNX Runtime Production Migration
+description: Migrate development PyTorch models to optimized ONNX Runtime for 50-70% cost reduction
+category: runtime_optimization
+confidence: 0.94
+success_count: 2847
+verified_environments: 89
+contributors:
+  - production_ai_team
+  - ml_ops_specialist
+  - inference_optimizer
+last_updated: "2025-01-15"
+
+environment_match:
+  runtime: pytorch
+  deployment_stage:
+    - development
+    - staging
+  gpu_utilization: "<60%"
+  batch_size: "<4"
+  model_types:
+    - transformer
+    - cnn
+    - rnn
+
+optimization:
+  technique: runtime_migration
+  expected_cost_reduction: "50-70%"
+  expected_latency_improvement: "40-60%"
+  effort_estimate: "2-3 weeks"
+  risk_level: low
+
+economics:
+  baseline_calculation:
+    current_cost_per_token: 0.004
+  projected_savings:
+    new_cost_per_token: 0.0015
+    monthly_savings_percent: 62.5
+  implementation_cost:
+    engineering_hours: 240
+    hourly_rate: 200
+    total_cost: 48000
+
+implementation:
+  prerequisites:
+    - requirement: "Python 3.8+"
+      validation_command: "python --version | grep -E '3\\.[8-9]|3\\.1[0-9]'"
+    - requirement: "ONNX 1.14+"
+      validation_command: "python -c 'import onnx; print(onnx.__version__)'"
+    - requirement: "onnxruntime-gpu 1.16+"
+      validation_command: "python -c 'import onnxruntime; print(onnxruntime.__version__)'"
+  automated_steps:
+    - step_id: model_export
+      name: Model Export
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/export_to_onnx.py --model-path ./pytorch_model --output ./model.onnx"
+        - "python -m onnxruntime.tools.symbolic_shape_infer --input model.onnx --output model_opt.onnx"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_onnx.py --model model_opt.onnx"
+        success_criteria: "exit_code == 0"
+        rollback_command: "rm -f model_opt.onnx"
+    - step_id: runtime_setup
+      name: Runtime Setup
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "pip install onnxruntime-gpu==1.16.0"
+        - "python scripts/setup_onnx_server.py --model model_opt.onnx --port 8001"
+      validation:
+        command: "curl -f http://localhost:8001/health"
+        success_criteria: "http_status == 200"
+        rollback_command: "pkill -f onnx_server"
+    - step_id: performance_validation
+      name: Performance Validation
+      executable: true
+      commands:
+        - "python scripts/benchmark_comparison.py --pytorch-endpoint localhost:8000 --onnx-endpoint localhost:8001"
+      validation:
+        command: "python scripts/validate_outputs.py --tolerance 1e-5"
+        success_criteria: "accuracy_match > 0.995"
+        rollback_command: "python scripts/rollback_to_pytorch.py"
+
+monitoring:
+  key_metrics:
+    - metric: cost_per_token
+      target: "<0.002"
+      alert_threshold: ">0.0025"
+    - metric: latency_p95
+      target: "<200ms"
+      alert_threshold: ">250ms"
+    - metric: accuracy_score
+      target: ">0.995"
+      alert_threshold: "<0.99"
+  rollback_triggers:
+    - condition: "cost_per_token > baseline * 1.1 for 30 minutes"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+    - condition: "accuracy_score < 0.99 for 3 consecutive validations"
+      action: automatic_rollback
+    - condition: "latency_p95 > baseline * 2.0 for 15 minutes"
+      action: alert_and_manual_review
+
+results:
+  recent_implementations:
+    - environment: healthcare_document_processing
+      baseline_monthly_cost: 36000
+      optimized_monthly_cost: 13500
+      cost_reduction_percent: 62.5
+      implementation_days: 14
+      quality_impact: -0.6