@palerock/exam-qa 1.0.6-patch2 → 1.0.6-patch21

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (83) hide show
  1. package/dist/index.html +1 -1
  2. package/dist/static/css/app.4293d3540537974d843eca825dcda382.css +2 -0
  3. package/dist/static/css/app.4293d3540537974d843eca825dcda382.css.map +1 -0
  4. package/dist/static/js/app.e278f9557d317b4606b0.js +2 -0
  5. package/dist/static/js/app.e278f9557d317b4606b0.js.map +1 -0
  6. package/dist/static/js/manifest.3ad1d5771e9b13dbdad2.js.map +1 -1
  7. package/lib-json/Dev1/345/237/272/347/241/200/351/242/230.json +1407 -0
  8. package/lib-json/Dev1/346/250/241/346/213/237/345/215/267A.json +1538 -0
  9. package/lib-json/Dev1/346/250/241/346/213/237/345/215/267B.json +1534 -0
  10. package/lib-json/Dev1/346/265/201/347/250/213/350/207/252/345/212/250/345/214/226/344/270/216/351/200/273/350/276/2211.json +1587 -0
  11. package/lib-json/Dev1/346/265/201/347/250/213/350/207/252/345/212/250/345/214/226/344/270/216/351/200/273/350/276/2212.json +1042 -0
  12. package/lib-json/Dev1/346/265/213/350/257/225_/350/260/203/350/257/225_/351/203/250/347/275/262.json +928 -0
  13. package/lib-json/Dev1/347/224/250/346/210/267/347/225/214/351/235/242.json +1243 -0
  14. package/lib-json/[DEV2]Salesforce/345/237/272/347/241/200.json +375 -0
  15. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/346/200/247/350/203/275.json +728 -0
  16. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/346/250/241/346/213/237/345/215/267A.json +1403 -0
  17. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/346/250/241/346/213/237/345/215/267B.json +1387 -0
  18. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/346/265/213/350/257/225/344/270/216/351/203/250/347/275/262.json +828 -0
  19. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/347/224/250/346/210/267/347/225/214/351/235/2421.json +977 -0
  20. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/347/224/250/346/210/267/347/225/214/351/235/2422.json +667 -0
  21. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/351/200/273/350/276/221/343/200/201/346/265/201/347/250/213/350/207/252/345/212/250/345/214/226/345/222/214/351/233/206/346/210/2201.json +1387 -0
  22. package/lib-json/[DEV2]/351/200/273/350/276/221/343/200/201/346/265/201/347/250/213/350/207/252/345/212/250/345/214/226/345/222/214/351/233/206/346/210/2202.json +260 -0
  23. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/344/270/200/347/253/240 /345/217/230/351/207/217-/347/261/273/345/236/213-/351/233/206/345/220/210.json" +1048 -0
  24. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/344/270/203/347/253/240 /346/265/213/350/257/225.json" +356 -0
  25. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/344/270/211/347/253/240 /346/265/217/350/247/210/345/231/250/345/222/214/344/272/213/344/273/266.json" +851 -0
  26. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/344/272/214/347/253/240 /345/257/271/350/261/241-/345/207/275/346/225/260-/347/261/273.json" +1787 -0
  27. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/344/272/224/347/253/240 /345/274/202/346/255/245/347/274/226/347/250/213.json" +547 -0
  28. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/345/205/255/347/253/240 /346/234/215/345/212/241/345/231/250/347/253/257JavaScript.json" +613 -0
  29. package/lib-json/[JS]/347/254/254/345/233/233/347/253/240 /350/260/203/350/257/225/345/222/214/351/224/231/350/257/257/345/244/204/347/220/206.json" +525 -0
  30. package/lib-json/[/345/222/270/351/261/274]AppBuilder-1.json +977 -0
  31. package/lib-json/[/345/222/270/351/261/274]AppBuilder-2.json +941 -0
  32. package/lib-json/[/345/222/270/351/261/274]AppBuilder-3.json +973 -0
  33. package/lib-json/[/345/222/270/351/261/274]AppBuilder-4.json +981 -0
  34. package/lib-json/[/345/222/270/351/261/274]AppBuilder-5.json +771 -0
  35. package/lib-json/map.json +28 -43
  36. package/package.json +4 -2
  37. package/dist/static/css/app.d3e969a579969be885a3462a1e12e37f.css +0 -2
  38. package/dist/static/css/app.d3e969a579969be885a3462a1e12e37f.css.map +0 -1
  39. package/dist/static/js/app.53370ddfe5eba6a10565.js +0 -2
  40. package/dist/static/js/app.53370ddfe5eba6a10565.js.map +0 -1
  41. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-10].json +0 -321
  42. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-1].json +0 -301
  43. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-2].json +0 -325
  44. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-3].json +0 -305
  45. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-4].json +0 -325
  46. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-5].json +0 -329
  47. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-6].json +0 -322
  48. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-7].json +0 -321
  49. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-8].json +0 -321
  50. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin(302)-[Set-9].json +0 -325
  51. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-10].json +0 -158
  52. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-1].json +0 -604
  53. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-2].json +0 -621
  54. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-3].json +0 -650
  55. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-4].json +0 -636
  56. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-5].json +0 -640
  57. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-6].json +0 -126
  58. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-7].json +0 -126
  59. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-8].json +0 -126
  60. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Admin-201-[Set-9].json +0 -126
  61. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-1].json +0 -321
  62. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-2].json +0 -325
  63. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-3].json +0 -321
  64. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-4].json +0 -337
  65. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-5].json +0 -329
  66. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-6].json +0 -325
  67. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Certified-Platform-Developer-1-[Set-7].json +0 -480
  68. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Sales-Cloud-Certification(81)-[Set-1].json +0 -305
  69. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Sales-Cloud-Certification(81)-[Set-2].json +0 -297
  70. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Sales-Cloud-Certification(81)-[Set-3].json +0 -269
  71. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Sales-Cloud-Certification(81)-[Set-4].json +0 -309
  72. package/lib-json/Salesforce-Sales-Cloud-Certification(81)-[Set-5].json +0 -515
  73. package/lib-json/app-builder-01.json +0 -1
  74. package/lib-json/app-builder-02.json +0 -1
  75. package/lib-json/app-builder-03.json +0 -1
  76. package/lib-json/app-builder-04.json +0 -1
  77. package/lib-json/app-builder-05.json +0 -1
  78. package/lib-json/app-builder-06.json +0 -1
  79. package/lib-json/app-builder-07.json +0 -1
  80. package/lib-json/app-builder-08.json +0 -1
  81. package/lib-json/app-builder-09.json +0 -1
  82. package/lib-json/app-builder-10.json +0 -1
  83. package/lib-json/app-builder-11.json +0 -311
@@ -0,0 +1,1407 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "title": "Dev1基础题",
3
+ "category": "Dev1-自由部落侠",
4
+ "questions": [
5
+ {
6
+ "describe": "A company has a custom object, Sales_Help_Request__c, that has a Lookup relationship to Opportunity. The Sales_Help_Request__c has a number field, Number_of_Hours__c, that represents the amount of time spent on the Sales_Help_Request__c.\nA developer is tasked with creating a field, Total_hours__c, on Opportunity that should be the sum of all of the Number_of_Hours__c values for the Sales_Help_Request__c records related to that Opportunity.\nWhat should the developer use to implement this?",
7
+ "answerOptions": [
8
+ {
9
+ "describe": "A trigger on the Opportunity object",
10
+ "isRight": false
11
+ },
12
+ {
13
+ "describe": "A roll-up summary field on the Opportunity object",
14
+ "isRight": false
15
+ },
16
+ {
17
+ "describe": "A record-triggered flow on the Sales_Help_Request__c object",
18
+ "isRight": true
19
+ },
20
+ {
21
+ "describe": "A roll-up summary field on the Sales_Help_Request__c object.",
22
+ "isRight": false
23
+ }
24
+ ],
25
+ "hashCode": "1995171579",
26
+ "analysis": ""
27
+ },
28
+ {
29
+ "describe": "AW Computing tracks order information in custom objects called Order__c and Order_Line__c. Currently, all shipping information is stored in the Order__c object.\nThe company wants to expand its order application to support split shipments so that any number of Order_Line__c records on a single Order__c can be shipped to different locations.\nWhat should a developer add to fulfill this requirement?",
30
+ "answerOptions": [
31
+ {
32
+ "describe": "Order_Shipment_Group__c object and master-detail field on Order__c",
33
+ "isRight": false
34
+ },
35
+ {
36
+ "describe": "Order_Shipment_Group__c object and master-detail field on Order_Line__c",
37
+ "isRight": false
38
+ },
39
+ {
40
+ "describe": "Order_Shipment_Group__c object and master-detail field on Order_Shipment_Group__c",
41
+ "isRight": false
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "describe": "Order_Shipment_Group__c object and master-detail field on Order__c and Order_Line__c",
45
+ "isRight": true
46
+ }
47
+ ],
48
+ "hashCode": "1995171577",
49
+ "analysis": ""
50
+ },
51
+ {
52
+ "describe": "UC is developing a process for their sales teams that requires all sales reps to go through a set of scripted steps with each new customer they create.\nIn the first step of collecting information, UC's ERP system must be checked via a REST endpoint to see if the customer exists. If the customer exists, the data must be presented to the sales rep in Salesforce.\nWhich two should a developer implement to satisfy the requirements?Choose 2 answers",
53
+ "answerOptions": [
54
+ {
55
+ "describe": "Trigger",
56
+ "isRight": false
57
+ },
58
+ {
59
+ "describe": "Invocable method",
60
+ "isRight": false
61
+ },
62
+ {
63
+ "describe": "Flow",
64
+ "isRight": true
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "describe": "Future method",
68
+ "isRight": true
69
+ }
70
+ ],
71
+ "hashCode": "1995171576",
72
+ "analysis": ""
73
+ },
74
+ {
75
+ "describe": "A developer created these three roll-up summary fields on the custom object, Project__c:\nTotal_Timesheets__c\nTotal_Approved_Timesheets__c\nTotal_Rejected_Timesheet__c\nThe developer is asked to create a new field that shows the ratio between rejected and approved timesheets for a given project.\nWhich should the developer use to implement the business requirement in order to minimize maintenance overhead?",
76
+ "answerOptions": [
77
+ {
78
+ "describe": "Roll-up summary field",
79
+ "isRight": false
80
+ },
81
+ {
82
+ "describe": "Record-triggered flow",
83
+ "isRight": false
84
+ },
85
+ {
86
+ "describe": "Formula field",
87
+ "isRight": true
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "describe": "Apex trigger",
91
+ "isRight": false
92
+ }
93
+ ],
94
+ "hashCode": "1995171571",
95
+ "analysis": ""
96
+ },
97
+ {
98
+ "describe": "A business has a proprietary Order Management System (OMS) that creates orders from their website and the orders.When the order Is created in the OMS,an integration also creates an order record In Salesforce relates it to the contact as identified by the email on the order As the order goes through different stages inOMS, the integration also updates it in Salesforce.\nIt is noticed that each update from the OMS creates new order record in Salesforce.\nWhich two actions will prevent the duplicate order records from being created in Salesforce?\nChoose 2 answers",
99
+ "answerOptions": [
100
+ {
101
+ "describe": "Ensure that the order number in the OMS is unique",
102
+ "isRight": true
103
+ },
104
+ {
105
+ "describe": "Use the order number from the OMS as an external ID.",
106
+ "isRight": true
107
+ },
108
+ {
109
+ "describe": "Use the email on the contact record as an external ID.",
110
+ "isRight": false
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "describe": "Write a before trigger on the order object to delete any duplicates",
114
+ "isRight": false
115
+ }
116
+ ],
117
+ "hashCode": "1988674164",
118
+ "analysis": ""
119
+ },
120
+ {
121
+ "describe": "UH is using Salesforce to capture job applications. A salesforce administrator created two custom objects; Job__c acting as the master object, Job_Application__c acting as the detail.\nWithin the Job__c object, a custom multi-select picklist, Preferred_Locations__c, contains a list of approved status for the position. Each Job_Application__c record relates to a Contact within the system through a master-detail relationship.\nRecruiters have requested the ability to view whether the Contact's Mailing State value matches a value selected on the Preferred_Locations__c field, within the Job_Application__c record. Recruiters would like this value to be kept in sync, if changes occur to the Contact's Mailing State or if the Job's Preferred_Locations__c field is updated.\nWhat is the recommended tool a developer should use to meet the business requirement?",
122
+ "answerOptions": [
123
+ {
124
+ "describe": "Apex trigger",
125
+ "isRight": true
126
+ },
127
+ {
128
+ "describe": "Record-triggered flow",
129
+ "isRight": false
130
+ },
131
+ {
132
+ "describe": "Formula field",
133
+ "isRight": false
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
137
+ "isRight": false
138
+ }
139
+ ],
140
+ "hashCode": "1988674162",
141
+ "analysis": ""
142
+ },
143
+ {
144
+ "describe": "A large corporation stores Orders and Line Items in Salesforce for different lines of business. Users are allowed see Orders across the entire organization,but,for security purposes, should only be able to see the Line Orders in their line of business.\nWhich type of relationship should be used between Line Items and Orders?",
145
+ "answerOptions": [
146
+ {
147
+ "describe": "Master-Detail",
148
+ "isRight": true
149
+ },
150
+ {
151
+ "describe": "Lookup",
152
+ "isRight": false
153
+ },
154
+ {
155
+ "describe": "Direct Lookup",
156
+ "isRight": false
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "describe": "Indirect Lookup",
160
+ "isRight": false
161
+ }
162
+ ],
163
+ "hashCode": "1988674161",
164
+ "analysis": ""
165
+ },
166
+ {
167
+ "describe": "What Is an example of a polymorphic lookup field in Salesforce?",
168
+ "answerOptions": [
169
+ {
170
+ "describe": "The WhatId field on the standard Event object",
171
+ "isRight": true
172
+ },
173
+ {
174
+ "describe": "A custom field,Link_c, on the standard Contact object that looks up to an Account",
175
+ "isRight": false
176
+ },
177
+ {
178
+ "describe": "The LeadId and ContactId fields on the standard Campaign Member object",
179
+ "isRight": false
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "describe": "The ParentId field on the standard Account object",
183
+ "isRight": false
184
+ }
185
+ ],
186
+ "hashCode": "1988674157",
187
+ "analysis": ""
188
+ },
189
+ {
190
+ "describe": "When a user edits the Postal Code on an Account,a custom Account text field named \"Tim updated based on the values in another custom object called PostalCodeToTimezone_c.\nWhat is the optimal way to implement this feature?",
191
+ "answerOptions": [
192
+ {
193
+ "describe": "Create an account approval proce",
194
+ "isRight": false
195
+ },
196
+ {
197
+ "describe": "Build a flow with Flow Builder.",
198
+ "isRight": true
199
+ },
200
+ {
201
+ "describe": "Create a formula field.",
202
+ "isRight": false
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "describe": "Build an account assignment rule,",
206
+ "isRight": false
207
+ }
208
+ ],
209
+ "hashCode": "1988674131",
210
+ "analysis": ""
211
+ },
212
+ {
213
+ "describe": "In terms of the MVC paradigm,what are two advantages of lmplementing the viewlayer of application using Lightning Web Component-based development over Visualforce?\nChoose 2 answers",
214
+ "answerOptions": [
215
+ {
216
+ "describe": "Built-in standard and custom set controllers",
217
+ "isRight": false
218
+ },
219
+ {
220
+ "describe": "Log capturing via the Debug Logs Setup page",
221
+ "isRight": false
222
+ },
223
+ {
224
+ "describe": "Self-contained and reusable units of an application",
225
+ "isRight": true
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "describe": "Rich component ecosystem",
229
+ "isRight": true
230
+ }
231
+ ],
232
+ "hashCode": "1988674130",
233
+ "analysis": ""
234
+ },
235
+ {
236
+ "describe": "UC uses a custom object called Vendor. The Vendor custom object has relationship with the standard Account object.\nBased on some internal discussions, the UC administrator tried to change the master-detail lookup relationship, but was not able to do so.\nWhat is a possible reason that this change was not permitted?",
237
+ "answerOptions": [
238
+ {
239
+ "describe": "The organization wide default for the Vendor object is Public Read/Write.",
240
+ "isRight": false
241
+ },
242
+ {
243
+ "describe": "Some of the Vendor records have null for the Account field.",
244
+ "isRight": false
245
+ },
246
+ {
247
+ "describe": "The Account object has a roll-up summary field on the Vendor object.",
248
+ "isRight": true
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "describe": "The Account object does not allow changing a field type for a custom field.",
252
+ "isRight": false
253
+ }
254
+ ],
255
+ "hashCode": "1988674127",
256
+ "analysis": ""
257
+ },
258
+ {
259
+ "describe": "Universal Containers has a support process that allows users to request support from its engineering team using custom object, Engineering_Support_c.\nUsers should be able to associate multiple Engineering Support_c records to a single Opportunty record.Addltionally, aggregate information about the Engineering Support _c records should be shown on the Opportunity record.\nWhat should a developer implement to support these requirements?",
260
+ "answerOptions": [
261
+ {
262
+ "describe": "Lookup field from Engineering_Support_c to Opportunity",
263
+ "isRight": false
264
+ },
265
+ {
266
+ "describe": "Master-detail field from EngineeringSupport_c to Opportunity",
267
+ "isRight": true
268
+ },
269
+ {
270
+ "describe": "Lookup field from Opportunity to Engineering Support_c",
271
+ "isRight": false
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "describe": "Master-detail field from Opportunity to Engineering Support_c",
275
+ "isRight": false
276
+ }
277
+ ],
278
+ "hashCode": "1988674126",
279
+ "analysis": ""
280
+ },
281
+ {
282
+ "describe": "A software company uses the following objects and relationships:\nCase: to handle customer support issues\nDefect_c: a custom object to represent known issues with the company's software\nCase_effect_c: a junction object between Case and Defect_c to represent that a defect is a cause of a customer issue\nCase and Defect_c have Private organization-wide defaults.\nWhat should be done to share a specific case_Defect_c record with a user?",
283
+ "answerOptions": [
284
+ {
285
+ "describe": "Share the parent Case and Defect_c records.",
286
+ "isRight": true
287
+ },
288
+ {
289
+ "describe": "Share the parent Case record.",
290
+ "isRight": false
291
+ },
292
+ {
293
+ "describe": "Share the case_Defect_c record.",
294
+ "isRight": false
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "describe": "Share the parent Defect_c record.",
298
+ "isRight": false
299
+ }
300
+ ],
301
+ "hashCode": "1988674096",
302
+ "analysis": ""
303
+ },
304
+ {
305
+ "describe": "UC has implemented an order management application. Each Order can have one or more Order Line items. The order Line object is related to the Order via a master-detail relationship. For each Order Line item, the total price is calculated by multiplying the Order Line item price with the quantity ordered.\nWhat is the best practice to get the sum of all Order Line item totals on the Order record?",
306
+ "answerOptions": [
307
+ {
308
+ "describe": "Roll-up summary field",
309
+ "isRight": true
310
+ },
311
+ {
312
+ "describe": "Quick action",
313
+ "isRight": false
314
+ },
315
+ {
316
+ "describe": "Apex trigger",
317
+ "isRight": false
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "describe": "Formula field",
321
+ "isRight": false
322
+ }
323
+ ],
324
+ "hashCode": "1988674071",
325
+ "analysis": ""
326
+ },
327
+ {
328
+ "describe": "Which two settings must be defined in order to update a record of a junction object?\nChoose 2 answers",
329
+ "answerOptions": [
330
+ {
331
+ "describe": "Read/write access on the primary relationship",
332
+ "isRight": true
333
+ },
334
+ {
335
+ "describe": "Read/write access on the junction object",
336
+ "isRight": false
337
+ },
338
+ {
339
+ "describe": "Read/write access on the secondary relationship",
340
+ "isRight": true
341
+ },
342
+ {
343
+ "describe": "Read access on the primary relationship",
344
+ "isRight": false
345
+ }
346
+ ],
347
+ "hashCode": "1988674069",
348
+ "analysis": ""
349
+ },
350
+ {
351
+ "describe": "What can be used to override the Account's standard Edit button for Lightning Experience?",
352
+ "answerOptions": [
353
+ {
354
+ "describe": "Lightning action",
355
+ "isRight": false
356
+ },
357
+ {
358
+ "describe": "Lightning component",
359
+ "isRight": true
360
+ },
361
+ {
362
+ "describe": "Lightning page",
363
+ "isRight": false
364
+ },
365
+ {
366
+ "describe": "Lightning flow",
367
+ "isRight": false
368
+ }
369
+ ],
370
+ "hashCode": "1988674068",
371
+ "analysis": ""
372
+ },
373
+ {
374
+ "describe": "Universal Containers is bullding a recruiting app with an Applicant object that stores information about an individual person and a Job object that represents a job. Each applicant may apply for more than one job.\nWhat should a developer implement to represent that an applicant has applied for a job?",
375
+ "answerOptions": [
376
+ {
377
+ "describe": "Master-detail field from Aplicant to Job",
378
+ "isRight": true
379
+ },
380
+ {
381
+ "describe": "Junction object between Applicant and Job",
382
+ "isRight": false
383
+ },
384
+ {
385
+ "describe": "Lookup field from Applicant to Job",
386
+ "isRight": false
387
+ },
388
+ {
389
+ "describe": "Formula field on Applicant that references Job",
390
+ "isRight": false
391
+ }
392
+ ],
393
+ "hashCode": "1988674064",
394
+ "analysis": ""
395
+ },
396
+ {
397
+ "describe": "A developer created a custom order management app that uses an Apex class. The order is represented by an Order object and an OrderItem object that has a master-detail relationship to Order. During order processing, an order may be split into multiple orders.\nWhat should a developer do to allow their code to move some existing OrderItem records to a new Order record?",
398
+ "answerOptions": [
399
+ {
400
+ "describe": "Select the Allow reparenting option on the master-detail relationship.",
401
+ "isRight": false
402
+ },
403
+ {
404
+ "describe": "Change the master-detail relationship to an external lookup relationship.",
405
+ "isRight": false
406
+ },
407
+ {
408
+ "describe": "Add without sharing to the Apex class declaration.",
409
+ "isRight": false
410
+ },
411
+ {
412
+ "describe": "Create a junction object between OrderItem and Order.",
413
+ "isRight": true
414
+ }
415
+ ],
416
+ "hashCode": "1988674041",
417
+ "analysis": ""
418
+ },
419
+ {
420
+ "describe": "A developer is integrating with a legacy on-premise SQL database.\nWhat should the developer use to ensure the data being integrated is matched to the right records in Salesforce?",
421
+ "answerOptions": [
422
+ {
423
+ "describe": "Lookup field",
424
+ "isRight": false
425
+ },
426
+ {
427
+ "describe": "External ID field",
428
+ "isRight": true
429
+ },
430
+ {
431
+ "describe": "Formula field",
432
+ "isRight": false
433
+ },
434
+ {
435
+ "describe": "External Object",
436
+ "isRight": false
437
+ }
438
+ ],
439
+ "hashCode": "1988674035",
440
+ "analysis": ""
441
+ },
442
+ {
443
+ "describe": "UC uses a Master-Detail relationship and stores the availability date on each Line Item of an Order and Orders are only shipped when all of the Line Items \nare available.\nWhich method should be used to calculate the estimated ship date for an Order?",
444
+ "answerOptions": [
445
+ {
446
+ "describe": "Use a LATEST formula on each of the latest availability date fields.",
447
+ "isRight": false
448
+ },
449
+ {
450
+ "describe": "Use a CEILING formula on each of the latest availability date fields.",
451
+ "isRight": false
452
+ },
453
+ {
454
+ "describe": "Use a MAX Roll-Up Summary field on the latest availability date fields.",
455
+ "isRight": true
456
+ },
457
+ {
458
+ "describe": "Use a DAYS formula on each of the availability date fields and a COUNT Roll-Up Summary field on the Order.",
459
+ "isRight": false
460
+ }
461
+ ],
462
+ "hashCode": "1988674006",
463
+ "analysis": ""
464
+ },
465
+ {
466
+ "describe": "A developer created these three roll-up summary fields on the custom object, Project__c:\nTotal_Timesheets__c\nTotal_Approved_Timesheets__c\nTotal_Rejected_Timesheet__c\nThe developer is asked to create a new field that shows the ratio between rejected and approved timesheets for a given project.\nWhat are two benefits of choosing a formula field instead of an Apex trigger to fulfill the request? Choose 2 answers",
467
+ "answerOptions": [
468
+ {
469
+ "describe": "A test class will validate the formula field during deployment.",
470
+ "isRight": false
471
+ },
472
+ {
473
+ "describe": "Using a formula field reduces maintenance overhead.",
474
+ "isRight": true
475
+ },
476
+ {
477
+ "describe": "A formula field will calculate the value retroactively for existing records.",
478
+ "isRight": true
479
+ },
480
+ {
481
+ "describe": "A formula field will trigger existing automation when delpoyed.",
482
+ "isRight": false
483
+ }
484
+ ],
485
+ "hashCode": "1988673328",
486
+ "analysis": ""
487
+ },
488
+ {
489
+ "describe": "In the Lightning UI, where should a developer look to find information about a Paused Flow Interview?",
490
+ "answerOptions": [
491
+ {
492
+ "describe": "In the system debug log by filtering on Paused Flow Interview",
493
+ "isRight": false
494
+ },
495
+ {
496
+ "describe": "On the Paused Flow Interviews related list for a given record",
497
+ "isRight": false
498
+ },
499
+ {
500
+ "describe": "On the Paused Flow Interviews component on the Home page",
501
+ "isRight": true
502
+ },
503
+ {
504
+ "describe": "In the Paused Interviews section of the Apex Flex Queue",
505
+ "isRight": false
506
+ }
507
+ ],
508
+ "hashCode": "1988673326",
509
+ "analysis": ""
510
+ },
511
+ {
512
+ "describe": "What are two benefits of using declarative customizations over code? Choose 2 answers",
513
+ "answerOptions": [
514
+ {
515
+ "describe": "Declarative customizations automatically update with each Salesforce release.",
516
+ "isRight": true
517
+ },
518
+ {
519
+ "describe": "Declarative customizations cannot generate run time errors.",
520
+ "isRight": false
521
+ },
522
+ {
523
+ "describe": "Declarative customizations automatically generate test classes.",
524
+ "isRight": false
525
+ },
526
+ {
527
+ "describe": "Declarative customizations generally require less maintenance.",
528
+ "isRight": true
529
+ }
530
+ ],
531
+ "hashCode": "1988673323",
532
+ "analysis": ""
533
+ },
534
+ {
535
+ "describe": "When importing and exporting data into Salesforce, Which two statement are true?\nChoose 2 answers",
536
+ "answerOptions": [
537
+ {
538
+ "describe": "Data import wizard is a client application provided by Salesforce.",
539
+ "isRight": false
540
+ },
541
+ {
542
+ "describe": "Developer and Developer Pro sandboxes have different storage limits.",
543
+ "isRight": true
544
+ },
545
+ {
546
+ "describe": "Bulk API can be used to import large data volumes in development environments without bypassing the storage limits.",
547
+ "isRight": true
548
+ },
549
+ {
550
+ "describe": "Bulk API can be used to bypass the storage limits when importing large data volumes in development environments.",
551
+ "isRight": false
552
+ }
553
+ ],
554
+ "hashCode": "1988673294",
555
+ "analysis": ""
556
+ },
557
+ {
558
+ "describe": "The values 'High', 'Medium', and 'Low' are identified as common values for multiple picklists across different objects.\nWhat is an approach a developer can take to streamline maintenance of the picklists and their values, while also restricting \nthe values to the ones mentioned above?",
559
+ "answerOptions": [
560
+ {
561
+ "describe": "Create the Picklist on each object and use a Global Picklist Value Set containing the values.",
562
+ "isRight": true
563
+ },
564
+ {
565
+ "describe": "Create the Picklist on each object as a required field and select \"Display values alphabetically, not in the order entered\".",
566
+ "isRight": false
567
+ },
568
+ {
569
+ "describe": "Create the Picklist on each object and select \"Restrict picklist to the values defined in the value set\".",
570
+ "isRight": false
571
+ },
572
+ {
573
+ "describe": "Create the Picklist on each object and add a validation rule to ensure data integrity.",
574
+ "isRight": false
575
+ }
576
+ ],
577
+ "hashCode": "1988673295",
578
+ "analysis": ""
579
+ },
580
+ {
581
+ "describe": "A developer needs to join data received from an integration with an external system with parent records in Salesforce. The data set does not contain the Salesforce IDs of the parent records, but it does have a foreign key attribute that can be used to identify the parent.\n\nWhich action will allow the developer to relate records in the data model without knowing the salesforce ID?",
582
+ "answerOptions": [
583
+ {
584
+ "describe": "Create and populate a custom field on the parent object marked as an External ID.",
585
+ "isRight": true
586
+ },
587
+ {
588
+ "describe": "Create a custom field on the child object of type Lookup. ",
589
+ "isRight": false
590
+ },
591
+ {
592
+ "describe": "Create a custom field on the child object of type External Relationship.",
593
+ "isRight": false
594
+ },
595
+ {
596
+ "describe": "Create and populate a custom field on the parent object marked as Unique.",
597
+ "isRight": false
598
+ }
599
+ ],
600
+ "hashCode": "1988673292",
601
+ "analysis": ""
602
+ },
603
+ {
604
+ "describe": "What is an example of a polymorphic lookup field in Salesforce?",
605
+ "answerOptions": [
606
+ {
607
+ "describe": "The Leadld and Contactld fields on the standard Campaign Member object",
608
+ "isRight": false
609
+ },
610
+ {
611
+ "describe": "A custom field, Link__c, on the standard Contact object that looks up to an Account or a Campaign",
612
+ "isRight": false
613
+ },
614
+ {
615
+ "describe": "The Whatld field on the standard Event object",
616
+ "isRight": true
617
+ },
618
+ {
619
+ "describe": "The Parentld field on the standard Account object",
620
+ "isRight": false
621
+ }
622
+ ],
623
+ "hashCode": "1988673290",
624
+ "analysis": ""
625
+ },
626
+ {
627
+ "describe": "UC wants to assess the advantages of declarative development versus programmatic customization for specific use cases in its Salesforce implementation.\n\nWhat are two characteristics of declarative development over programmatic customization? Choose 2 answers",
628
+ "answerOptions": [
629
+ {
630
+ "describe": "Declarative development has higher design limits and query limits.",
631
+ "isRight": false
632
+ },
633
+ {
634
+ "describe": "Declarative development can be done using the Setup UI.",
635
+ "isRight": true
636
+ },
637
+ {
638
+ "describe": "Declarative development does not require maintenance.",
639
+ "isRight": true
640
+ },
641
+ {
642
+ "describe": "Declarative development does not require Apex test classes.",
643
+ "isRight": false
644
+ }
645
+ ],
646
+ "hashCode": "1988673262",
647
+ "analysis": ""
648
+ },
649
+ {
650
+ "describe": "UC decides to use purely declarative development to build out a new Salesforce application.\nWhich three options can be used to build out the business logic layer for this application?Choose 3 answers",
651
+ "answerOptions": [
652
+ {
653
+ "describe": "Validation Rules",
654
+ "isRight": true
655
+ },
656
+ {
657
+ "describe": "Remote Actions",
658
+ "isRight": false
659
+ },
660
+ {
661
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
662
+ "isRight": true
663
+ },
664
+ {
665
+ "describe": "Flow Builder",
666
+ "isRight": true
667
+ },
668
+ {
669
+ "describe": "Batch Jobs",
670
+ "isRight": false
671
+ }
672
+ ],
673
+ "hashCode": "1988673260",
674
+ "analysis": ""
675
+ },
676
+ {
677
+ "describe": "A PrimaryId__c custom field exists on the Candidate__c custom object. The field is used to store each candidate's id number and is marked as Unique in the schema definition.\n\nAs part of a data enrichment process, UC has a CSV file that contains updated data for all candidates in the system. The file contains each Candidate's primary id as a data point. UC wants to upload this information into Salesforce, while ensuring all data rows are correctly mapped to a candidate in the system.\n\nWhich technique should the developer implement to streamline the data upload?",
678
+ "answerOptions": [
679
+ {
680
+ "describe": "Create a before insert trigger to correctly map the records. ",
681
+ "isRight": false
682
+ },
683
+ {
684
+ "describe": "Upload the CSV into a custom object related to Candidate__c. ",
685
+ "isRight": false
686
+ },
687
+ {
688
+ "describe": "Update the Primaryld__c field definition to mark it as an External Id.",
689
+ "isRight": true
690
+ },
691
+ {
692
+ "describe": "Create a Process Builder on the Candidate__c object to map the records.",
693
+ "isRight": false
694
+ }
695
+ ],
696
+ "hashCode": "1988673259",
697
+ "analysis": "https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000320964&type=1&mode=1"
698
+ },
699
+ {
700
+ "describe": "Which two types of process automation can be used to calculate the shipping cost for an Order when the Order is placed and apply a percentage of the shipping cost to some of the related Order Products? Choose 2 answers",
701
+ "answerOptions": [
702
+ {
703
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
704
+ "isRight": true
705
+ },
706
+ {
707
+ "describe": "Approval Process",
708
+ "isRight": false
709
+ },
710
+ {
711
+ "describe": "Workflow Rule",
712
+ "isRight": false
713
+ },
714
+ {
715
+ "describe": "Flow Builder",
716
+ "isRight": true
717
+ }
718
+ ],
719
+ "hashCode": "1988673231",
720
+ "analysis": ""
721
+ },
722
+ {
723
+ "describe": "What are two characteristics related to formulas? Choose 2 answers",
724
+ "answerOptions": [
725
+ {
726
+ "describe": "Formulas can reference themselves.",
727
+ "isRight": false
728
+ },
729
+ {
730
+ "describe": "Formulas are calculated at runtime and are not stored in the database.",
731
+ "isRight": true
732
+ },
733
+ {
734
+ "describe": "Fields that are used in a formula field can be deleted or edited without editing the formula.",
735
+ "isRight": false
736
+ },
737
+ {
738
+ "describe": "Formulas can reference values in related objects.",
739
+ "isRight": true
740
+ }
741
+ ],
742
+ "hashCode": "1988673228",
743
+ "analysis": ""
744
+ },
745
+ {
746
+ "describe": "What is fundamental different between a Mater-Detail relationship and a Lookup relationship?",
747
+ "answerOptions": [
748
+ {
749
+ "describe": "In a Master-Detail relationship, when a record of a master object is deleted, the detail records are not deleted.",
750
+ "isRight": false
751
+ },
752
+ {
753
+ "describe": "A Master-Detail relationship detail record inherits the sharing and security of its master record.",
754
+ "isRight": true
755
+ },
756
+ {
757
+ "describe": "In a Lookup relationship, the field value is mandatory.",
758
+ "isRight": false
759
+ },
760
+ {
761
+ "describe": "In a Lookup relationship when the parent record is deleted, the child records are always deleted.",
762
+ "isRight": false
763
+ }
764
+ ],
765
+ "hashCode": "1988673204",
766
+ "analysis": ""
767
+ },
768
+ {
769
+ "describe": "Which two statements accurately represent the MVC framework implementation in Salesforce?Choose 2 answers",
770
+ "answerOptions": [
771
+ {
772
+ "describe": "Standard and Custom objects used in the app schema represent the View (V) part of the MVC framework.",
773
+ "isRight": false
774
+ },
775
+ {
776
+ "describe": "Lightning component HTML files represent the Model (M) part of the MVC framework.",
777
+ "isRight": false
778
+ },
779
+ {
780
+ "describe": "Tigger used to create records represent the Model (M) part of the MVC framework.",
781
+ "isRight": true
782
+ },
783
+ {
784
+ "describe": "Validation rules enforce business rules and represent the Controller (C) part of the MVC framework.",
785
+ "isRight": true
786
+ }
787
+ ],
788
+ "hashCode": "1988673201",
789
+ "analysis": "https://developer.salesforce.com/forums/?id=906F0000000kDZpIAM"
790
+ },
791
+ {
792
+ "describe": "What is a benefit of developing applications in a multi-tenant environment?",
793
+ "answerOptions": [
794
+ {
795
+ "describe": "Default out-of-the-box configuration",
796
+ "isRight": true
797
+ },
798
+ {
799
+ "describe": "Access to predefined computing resources",
800
+ "isRight": false
801
+ },
802
+ {
803
+ "describe": "Unlimited processing power and memory",
804
+ "isRight": false
805
+ },
806
+ {
807
+ "describe": "Enforced best practices for development",
808
+ "isRight": false
809
+ }
810
+ ],
811
+ "hashCode": "1988673199",
812
+ "analysis": ""
813
+ },
814
+ {
815
+ "describe": "A SSN__c custom field exists on the Candidate __c custom object. The field is used to store each candidate's social security number and is marked as Unique in the schema definition.\n\nAs part of a data enrichment process, Universal Containers has a CSV file that contains updated data for all candidates in the system. The file contains each Candidate's social security number as a data point. Universal Containers wants to upload this information into Salesforce, while ensuring all data rows are correctly mapped to a candidate in the system. Which technique should the developer implement to streamline the data upload?",
816
+ "answerOptions": [
817
+ {
818
+ "describe": "Upload the CSV into a custom object related to Candidate__c. ",
819
+ "isRight": false
820
+ },
821
+ {
822
+ "describe": "Update the SSN__c field definition to mark it as an External Id.",
823
+ "isRight": true
824
+ },
825
+ {
826
+ "describe": "Create a before insert trigger to correctly map the records. ",
827
+ "isRight": false
828
+ },
829
+ {
830
+ "describe": "Create a process Builder on the Candidate__c object to map the records.",
831
+ "isRight": false
832
+ }
833
+ ],
834
+ "hashCode": "1988673197",
835
+ "analysis": ""
836
+ },
837
+ {
838
+ "describe": "Which three operations affect the number of times a trigger can fire? Choose 3 answers",
839
+ "answerOptions": [
840
+ {
841
+ "describe": "Email messages",
842
+ "isRight": false
843
+ },
844
+ {
845
+ "describe": "Roll-Up Summary fields",
846
+ "isRight": true
847
+ },
848
+ {
849
+ "describe": "Workflow Rules",
850
+ "isRight": true
851
+ },
852
+ {
853
+ "describe": "Criteria-based Sharing calculations",
854
+ "isRight": false
855
+ },
856
+ {
857
+ "describe": "Lightning Flows",
858
+ "isRight": true
859
+ }
860
+ ],
861
+ "hashCode": "1988673166",
862
+ "analysis": ""
863
+ },
864
+ {
865
+ "describe": "When a user edits the Postal Code on an Account, a custom Account text field named \"TimeZone\" must be updated based on the values in a PostalCodeToTimeZone__c custom object.\nHow should a developer implement this feature?",
866
+ "answerOptions": [
867
+ {
868
+ "describe": "Build an Account custom trigger",
869
+ "isRight": true
870
+ },
871
+ {
872
+ "describe": "Build an Account Workflow Rule",
873
+ "isRight": false
874
+ },
875
+ {
876
+ "describe": "Build an Account Assignment Rule",
877
+ "isRight": false
878
+ },
879
+ {
880
+ "describe": "Build an Account Approval Process.",
881
+ "isRight": false
882
+ }
883
+ ],
884
+ "hashCode": "1988673165",
885
+ "analysis": ""
886
+ },
887
+ {
888
+ "describe": "A developer wants to import 500 Opportunity records into a sandbox.\nWhy should the developer choose to use Data Loader instead of Data Import Wizard?",
889
+ "answerOptions": [
890
+ {
891
+ "describe": "Data Import Wizard does not support Opportunities.",
892
+ "isRight": true
893
+ },
894
+ {
895
+ "describe": "Data Import Wizard can not import all 500 records.",
896
+ "isRight": false
897
+ },
898
+ {
899
+ "describe": "Data Loader runs from the developer's browser.",
900
+ "isRight": false
901
+ },
902
+ {
903
+ "describe": "Data Loader automatically relates Opportunities to Accounts.",
904
+ "isRight": false
905
+ }
906
+ ],
907
+ "hashCode": "1988673138",
908
+ "analysis": ""
909
+ },
910
+ {
911
+ "describe": "Universal Containers has an order system that uses an Order Number to indentify an order for customers and service agents. Order records will be imported into Salesforce. \nHow should the Order Number field be defined in Salesforce?",
912
+ "answerOptions": [
913
+ {
914
+ "describe": "Indirect Lookup",
915
+ "isRight": false
916
+ },
917
+ {
918
+ "describe": "Lookup",
919
+ "isRight": false
920
+ },
921
+ {
922
+ "describe": "Number with External ID",
923
+ "isRight": true
924
+ },
925
+ {
926
+ "describe": "Direct Lookup",
927
+ "isRight": false
928
+ }
929
+ ],
930
+ "hashCode": "1988673111",
931
+ "analysis": ""
932
+ },
933
+ {
934
+ "describe": "UC uses a custom object called Vendor. The Vendor custom object has a Master-Detail relationship with the standard Account object.\nBased on some internal discussions, the UC administrator tried to change the Master-Detail relationship to a Lookup relationship but was not able to do so.\n\nWhat is possible reason that this change was not permitted?",
935
+ "answerOptions": [
936
+ {
937
+ "describe": "The Vendor object must use a Master-Detail field for reporting.",
938
+ "isRight": false
939
+ },
940
+ {
941
+ "describe": "The Account object is included on a workflow on the Vendor object.",
942
+ "isRight": false
943
+ },
944
+ {
945
+ "describe": "The Account records contain Vendor roll-up summary fields.",
946
+ "isRight": true
947
+ },
948
+ {
949
+ "describe": "The Vendor records has existing values in the Account object.",
950
+ "isRight": false
951
+ }
952
+ ],
953
+ "hashCode": "1988673105",
954
+ "analysis": ""
955
+ },
956
+ {
957
+ "describe": "An org has an existing Flow that creates an Opportunity with an Update Records element. A developer must update the Visual Flow to also create a Contact and store the created Contact's ID on the Opportunity.\nWhich update should the developer make in the Visual Flow?",
958
+ "answerOptions": [
959
+ {
960
+ "describe": "Add a new Get Records element.",
961
+ "isRight": false
962
+ },
963
+ {
964
+ "describe": "Add a new Update Records element.",
965
+ "isRight": false
966
+ },
967
+ {
968
+ "describe": "Add a new Create Records element.",
969
+ "isRight": true
970
+ },
971
+ {
972
+ "describe": "Add a new Quick Action(of type Create) element.",
973
+ "isRight": false
974
+ }
975
+ ],
976
+ "hashCode": "1988673103",
977
+ "analysis": ""
978
+ },
979
+ {
980
+ "describe": "A custom picklist field Food_Preference__c, exists an a custom object. The picklist contains the following options:\n'Vegan'. 'Kosher', 'No Preference'. The developer must ensure a value is populated every time a record is created or updated.",
981
+ "answerOptions": [
982
+ {
983
+ "describe": "Mark the field as Required on the object's page Layout.",
984
+ "isRight": false
985
+ },
986
+ {
987
+ "describe": "Mark the field as Required on the field definition.",
988
+ "isRight": true
989
+ },
990
+ {
991
+ "describe": "Set \"Use the first value in the list as default value\" as True.",
992
+ "isRight": false
993
+ },
994
+ {
995
+ "describe": "Set a validation rule to enforce a value is selected.",
996
+ "isRight": false
997
+ }
998
+ ],
999
+ "hashCode": "1988673081",
1000
+ "analysis": ""
1001
+ },
1002
+ {
1003
+ "describe": "Universal Containers decides to use exclusively declarative development to build out a new Salesforce application.\nWhich three options should be used to build out the database layer for the application? Choose 3 answers",
1004
+ "answerOptions": [
1005
+ {
1006
+ "describe": "Relationships",
1007
+ "isRight": true
1008
+ },
1009
+ {
1010
+ "describe": "Flows",
1011
+ "isRight": false
1012
+ },
1013
+ {
1014
+ "describe": "Triggers",
1015
+ "isRight": false
1016
+ },
1017
+ {
1018
+ "describe": "Custom Objects and Fields",
1019
+ "isRight": true
1020
+ },
1021
+ {
1022
+ "describe": "Roll-up Summaries",
1023
+ "isRight": true
1024
+ }
1025
+ ],
1026
+ "hashCode": "1988673079",
1027
+ "analysis": ""
1028
+ },
1029
+ {
1030
+ "describe": "An org tracks customer orders on an Order object and the line items of an Order on the Line Item object. The Line Item object has a \nMaster/Detail relationship to the Order object. A developer has requirement to calculate the order amount on an Order and the line amount \non each Line Item based on quantity and price.\nWhat is the correct implementation?",
1031
+ "answerOptions": [
1032
+ {
1033
+ "describe": "Write a process an the Line Item that calculated the item amount and order amount and updates the fields on the Line Item and the Order.",
1034
+ "isRight": false
1035
+ },
1036
+ {
1037
+ "describe": "Implement the line amount as a numeric formula field and the order amount as a roll-up summary field.",
1038
+ "isRight": true
1039
+ },
1040
+ {
1041
+ "describe": "Implement the line amount as a currency field and the order amount as SUM formula field.",
1042
+ "isRight": false
1043
+ },
1044
+ {
1045
+ "describe": "Write a single before trigger on the Line Item that calculates the item amount and updates the order amount on the Order.",
1046
+ "isRight": false
1047
+ }
1048
+ ],
1049
+ "hashCode": "1988673045",
1050
+ "analysis": ""
1051
+ },
1052
+ {
1053
+ "describe": "A developer needs to implement the functionality for a service agent to gather multiple pieces of imformation from a customer in order to \nsend a replacement credit card.\nWhich automation tool meets these requirements?",
1054
+ "answerOptions": [
1055
+ {
1056
+ "describe": "Lightning Component",
1057
+ "isRight": false
1058
+ },
1059
+ {
1060
+ "describe": "Flow Builder",
1061
+ "isRight": true
1062
+ },
1063
+ {
1064
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1065
+ "isRight": false
1066
+ },
1067
+ {
1068
+ "describe": "Approval Process",
1069
+ "isRight": false
1070
+ }
1071
+ ],
1072
+ "hashCode": "1988673043",
1073
+ "analysis": ""
1074
+ },
1075
+ {
1076
+ "describe": "Universal Containers used a simple Order Management app. On the Order Lines, the order line total is calculated by multiplying the item price \nwith the quantity ordered. There is a Master-Detail relationship between the Order and the Order Lines object.\nWhat is the best practice to get the sum of all order line totals on the order header?",
1077
+ "answerOptions": [
1078
+ {
1079
+ "describe": "Apex Trigger",
1080
+ "isRight": false
1081
+ },
1082
+ {
1083
+ "describe": "Declarative Roll-Up Summary App",
1084
+ "isRight": false
1085
+ },
1086
+ {
1087
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1088
+ "isRight": false
1089
+ },
1090
+ {
1091
+ "describe": "Roll-Up Summary Field",
1092
+ "isRight": true
1093
+ }
1094
+ ],
1095
+ "hashCode": "1988673042",
1096
+ "analysis": ""
1097
+ },
1098
+ {
1099
+ "describe": "Which aspect of Apex programming is limited due to multitenancy?",
1100
+ "answerOptions": [
1101
+ {
1102
+ "describe": "The number of methods in an Apex class",
1103
+ "isRight": false
1104
+ },
1105
+ {
1106
+ "describe": "The number of records returned from database queries",
1107
+ "isRight": true
1108
+ },
1109
+ {
1110
+ "describe": "The number of active Apex classes",
1111
+ "isRight": false
1112
+ },
1113
+ {
1114
+ "describe": "The number of records processed in a loop.",
1115
+ "isRight": false
1116
+ }
1117
+ ],
1118
+ "hashCode": "1988673041",
1119
+ "analysis": ""
1120
+ },
1121
+ {
1122
+ "describe": "Universal Containers stores Orders and Line Items in Salesforce. For security reasons, financial representatives are allowed to see information\non the Order such as order amount, but they are not allowed to see the Line Item on the Order.\nWhich type of relationship should be user?",
1123
+ "answerOptions": [
1124
+ {
1125
+ "describe": "Indirect Lookup",
1126
+ "isRight": false
1127
+ },
1128
+ {
1129
+ "describe": "Lookup",
1130
+ "isRight": true
1131
+ },
1132
+ {
1133
+ "describe": "Master-Detail",
1134
+ "isRight": false
1135
+ },
1136
+ {
1137
+ "describe": "Direct Lookup",
1138
+ "isRight": false
1139
+ }
1140
+ ],
1141
+ "hashCode": "1988672368",
1142
+ "analysis": ""
1143
+ },
1144
+ {
1145
+ "describe": "In terms of the MVC paradigm, what are two advantages of implementing the view layer of a Salesforce application using Aura Component-based \ndevelopment over Visualforce?Choose 2 answers",
1146
+ "answerOptions": [
1147
+ {
1148
+ "describe": "Server-side run-time debugging",
1149
+ "isRight": false
1150
+ },
1151
+ {
1152
+ "describe": "Self-contained and reusable units of an application",
1153
+ "isRight": true
1154
+ },
1155
+ {
1156
+ "describe": "Automatic code generation",
1157
+ "isRight": false
1158
+ },
1159
+ {
1160
+ "describe": "Rich component ecosystem",
1161
+ "isRight": true
1162
+ }
1163
+ ],
1164
+ "hashCode": "1988672367",
1165
+ "analysis": ""
1166
+ },
1167
+ {
1168
+ "describe": "Universal Containers wants to back up all of the data and attachments in Salesforce org once a month.\nWhich approach should a developer use to meet this requirement?",
1169
+ "answerOptions": [
1170
+ {
1171
+ "describe": "Schedule a report",
1172
+ "isRight": false
1173
+ },
1174
+ {
1175
+ "describe": "Create a Schedulable Apex Class",
1176
+ "isRight": false
1177
+ },
1178
+ {
1179
+ "describe": "Define a Data Export scheduled job.",
1180
+ "isRight": true
1181
+ },
1182
+ {
1183
+ "describe": "Use the data loader command line.",
1184
+ "isRight": false
1185
+ }
1186
+ ],
1187
+ "hashCode": "1988672365",
1188
+ "analysis": ""
1189
+ },
1190
+ {
1191
+ "describe": "A developer has a requirement to create an Order when an Opportunity reaches a 'Closed-Won' status.\nWhich tool should be used to implement this requirement?",
1192
+ "answerOptions": [
1193
+ {
1194
+ "describe": "Lightning Flow",
1195
+ "isRight": false
1196
+ },
1197
+ {
1198
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1199
+ "isRight": true
1200
+ },
1201
+ {
1202
+ "describe": "Apex Trigger",
1203
+ "isRight": false
1204
+ },
1205
+ {
1206
+ "describe": "Lightning Component",
1207
+ "isRight": false
1208
+ }
1209
+ ],
1210
+ "hashCode": "1988672361",
1211
+ "analysis": ""
1212
+ },
1213
+ {
1214
+ "describe": "A developer must build an application that tracks which Accounts have purchaesd specific pieces of equipment that are represented as \nProducts Each Account could purchse many pieces of equipment.\nHow should the developer track that an Account has purchased a piece of equipment?",
1215
+ "answerOptions": [
1216
+ {
1217
+ "describe": "Use a Lookup on Account to Product",
1218
+ "isRight": false
1219
+ },
1220
+ {
1221
+ "describe": "Use the Asset object",
1222
+ "isRight": true
1223
+ },
1224
+ {
1225
+ "describe": "Use a Master-Detail on Product to Account",
1226
+ "isRight": false
1227
+ },
1228
+ {
1229
+ "describe": "Use a Custom object",
1230
+ "isRight": false
1231
+ }
1232
+ ],
1233
+ "hashCode": "1988672337",
1234
+ "analysis": ""
1235
+ },
1236
+ {
1237
+ "describe": "UC wants to lower its shipping cost while making the shipping process more efficient. The Distribution Officer advises UC to implement global addresses to allow multiple Accounts to share a default pickup address. The developer is tasked to create the supporting object and relationship for this business requirement and uses the Setup Menu to create a custom object called \"Global Address\".\n\nWhich field should the developer add to create the most efficient model that supports the business need?",
1238
+ "answerOptions": [
1239
+ {
1240
+ "describe": "Add a Master-Detail field on the Global Address object to the Account object.",
1241
+ "isRight": false
1242
+ },
1243
+ {
1244
+ "describe": "Add a Lookup field on the Account object to the Global Address object.",
1245
+ "isRight": true
1246
+ },
1247
+ {
1248
+ "describe": "Add a Master-Detail field on the Account object to the Global Address object.",
1249
+ "isRight": false
1250
+ },
1251
+ {
1252
+ "describe": "Add a Lookup field on the Global Address object to the Account object.",
1253
+ "isRight": false
1254
+ }
1255
+ ],
1256
+ "hashCode": "1988672335",
1257
+ "analysis": ""
1258
+ },
1259
+ {
1260
+ "describe": "A Licensed_Professional __c custom object exists in the system with two Master-Detail fields for the following objects: Certification__c and Contact.\n\nUsers with the \"Certification Representative\" role can access the Certification records they own and view the related Licensed Professionals records, however users with the \"Sales Representative\" role report they cannot view any Licensed Professional records even though they own the associated Contact record.\n\nWhat are two likely causes of users in the \"Sales Representative\" role not being able to access the Licensed Professional records?Choose 2 answers",
1261
+ "answerOptions": [
1262
+ {
1263
+ "describe": "The organization has a private sharing model for Certification__c, and Contact is the primary relationship in the Licensed_Professinal__c object.",
1264
+ "isRight": false
1265
+ },
1266
+ {
1267
+ "describe": "The organization has a private sharing model for Certification__c, and Certification__c is the primary relationship in the Licensed_Professinal__c object. ",
1268
+ "isRight": true
1269
+ },
1270
+ {
1271
+ "describe": "The organization recently modified the Sales Representative role to restrict Read/Write access to Licensed_Professinal__c. ",
1272
+ "isRight": false
1273
+ },
1274
+ {
1275
+ "describe": "The organization recently modified the Sales Representative role to restrict Read access to Licensed_Professinal__c. ",
1276
+ "isRight": true
1277
+ }
1278
+ ],
1279
+ "hashCode": "1988672332",
1280
+ "analysis": "https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=relationships_considerations.htm&type=5"
1281
+ },
1282
+ {
1283
+ "describe": "Which three process automations can immediately send an email notification to the owner of an Opportunity \nwhen its Amount is changed to be greater than $10.000? Choose 3 answers",
1284
+ "answerOptions": [
1285
+ {
1286
+ "describe": "Escalation Rule",
1287
+ "isRight": false
1288
+ },
1289
+ {
1290
+ "describe": "Workflow Rule",
1291
+ "isRight": true
1292
+ },
1293
+ {
1294
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1295
+ "isRight": true
1296
+ },
1297
+ {
1298
+ "describe": "Flow Builder",
1299
+ "isRight": true
1300
+ },
1301
+ {
1302
+ "describe": "Approval Process",
1303
+ "isRight": false
1304
+ }
1305
+ ],
1306
+ "hashCode": "1988672330",
1307
+ "analysis": ""
1308
+ },
1309
+ {
1310
+ "describe": "Which process automation should be used to send an outbound message without using Apex code?",
1311
+ "answerOptions": [
1312
+ {
1313
+ "describe": "Flow Builder",
1314
+ "isRight": false
1315
+ },
1316
+ {
1317
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1318
+ "isRight": false
1319
+ },
1320
+ {
1321
+ "describe": "Approval Process",
1322
+ "isRight": false
1323
+ },
1324
+ {
1325
+ "describe": "Workflow Rule",
1326
+ "isRight": true
1327
+ }
1328
+ ],
1329
+ "hashCode": "1988672329",
1330
+ "analysis": ""
1331
+ },
1332
+ {
1333
+ "describe": "A developer at Universal Containers is tasked with implementing a new Salesforce application that must built by their company's Salesforce administrator.\nWhich three options should be considered for building out the business logic layer of the application? Choose 3 answers",
1334
+ "answerOptions": [
1335
+ {
1336
+ "describe": "Scheduled Jobs",
1337
+ "isRight": false
1338
+ },
1339
+ {
1340
+ "describe": "Validation Rules",
1341
+ "isRight": true
1342
+ },
1343
+ {
1344
+ "describe": "Invocable Actions",
1345
+ "isRight": false
1346
+ },
1347
+ {
1348
+ "describe": "Workflows",
1349
+ "isRight": true
1350
+ },
1351
+ {
1352
+ "describe": "Process Builder",
1353
+ "isRight": true
1354
+ }
1355
+ ],
1356
+ "hashCode": "1988672328",
1357
+ "analysis": ""
1358
+ },
1359
+ {
1360
+ "describe": "A developer has the following requirements:\n1. Calculate the total amount on an Order.\n2. Calculate the line amount for each Line Item based on quantity selected and price.\n3. Move Line Items to a different Order if a Line Item is not in stock.\nWhich relationship implementation supports these requirements?",
1361
+ "answerOptions": [
1362
+ {
1363
+ "describe": "Line Item has a Master-Detail field to Order and the Master can be re-parented.",
1364
+ "isRight": true
1365
+ },
1366
+ {
1367
+ "describe": "Order has a Lookup field to Line Item and there can be many Line Item per Order.",
1368
+ "isRight": false
1369
+ },
1370
+ {
1371
+ "describe": "Line Item has a Lookup field to Order and there can be many Line Item per Order.",
1372
+ "isRight": false
1373
+ },
1374
+ {
1375
+ "describe": "Order has a Master-Detail field to Line Item and there can be many Line Item per Order.",
1376
+ "isRight": false
1377
+ }
1378
+ ],
1379
+ "hashCode": "1988672306",
1380
+ "analysis": ""
1381
+ },
1382
+ {
1383
+ "describe": "UC uses a custom object called Vendor. The Vendor custom object has a Master-Detail relationship with the standard Account object.\nBased on some internal discussions, the UC administrator tried to change the Master-Detail relationship to a Lookup relationship but was not able to do so.\nWhat is possible reason that this change was not permitted?",
1384
+ "answerOptions": [
1385
+ {
1386
+ "describe": "The Vendor object must use a Master-Detail field for reporting.",
1387
+ "isRight": false
1388
+ },
1389
+ {
1390
+ "describe": "The Account object is included on a workflow on the Vendor object.",
1391
+ "isRight": false
1392
+ },
1393
+ {
1394
+ "describe": "The Account records contain Vendor roll-up summary fields.",
1395
+ "isRight": true
1396
+ },
1397
+ {
1398
+ "describe": "The Vendor records has existing values in the Account object.",
1399
+ "isRight": false
1400
+ }
1401
+ ],
1402
+ "hashCode": "1988672274",
1403
+ "analysis": ""
1404
+ }
1405
+ ],
1406
+ "hashCode": "-123844663"
1407
+ }