@oneuptime/common 13.0.6 → 13.0.8

package/Tests/Server/Utils/AI/InvestigationEligibility.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
+import InvestigationEligibility, {
+  InvestigationSubject,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/AI/SRE/InvestigationEligibility";
+import AIInvestigationEngine from "../../../../Server/Utils/AI/SRE/AIInvestigationEngine";
+import AIAlertInvestigationRunner from "../../../../Server/Utils/AI/SRE/AlertInvestigationRunner";
+import AIIncidentInvestigationRunner from "../../../../Server/Utils/AI/SRE/IncidentInvestigationRunner";
+import AIInvestigationQueue from "../../../../Server/Utils/AI/SRE/InvestigationQueue";
+import Semaphore from "../../../../Server/Infrastructure/Semaphore";
+import AIService from "../../../../Server/Services/AIService";
+import AIRunService from "../../../../Server/Services/AIRunService";
+import AlertService from "../../../../Server/Services/AlertService";
+import IncidentService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentService";
+import ProjectService from "../../../../Server/Services/ProjectService";
+import LlmProviderService from "../../../../Server/Services/LlmProviderService";
+import Alert from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Alert";
+import Incident from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Incident";
+import Project from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Project";
+import AIRun from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/AIRun";
+import LlmProvider from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/LlmProvider";
+import ObjectID from "../../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import InvestigationNotStartedReason, {
+  InvestigationNotStartedCode,
+} from "../../../../Types/AI/InvestigationNotStartedReason";
+
+const projectId: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+const alertId: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+const incidentId: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+const subjects: Array<InvestigationSubject> = [
+  { projectId, alertId },
+  { projectId, incidentId },
+];
+const codes: Array<InvestigationNotStartedCode> = [
+  "ai_disabled",
+  "automatic_investigation_disabled",
+  "provider_missing",
+  "severity_below_threshold",
+  "monitor_cooldown",
+  "daily_budget_exhausted",
+  "budget_check_failed",
+  "enqueue_failed",
+  "eligibility_check_failed",
+  "no_run_recorded",
+];
+const configurationCodes: Array<InvestigationNotStartedCode> = [
+  "ai_disabled",
+  "automatic_investigation_disabled",
+  "provider_missing",
+  "severity_below_threshold",
+];
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  jest.restoreAllMocks();
+});
+
+function enabledProject(): Project {
+  const project: Project = new Project(projectId);
+  project.enableAi = true;
+  project.enableAutomaticAlertInvestigation = true;
+  project.enableAutomaticIncidentInvestigation = true;
+  return project;
+}
+
+function mockMissingDecision(): void {
+  jest.spyOn(AlertService, "findOneBy").mockResolvedValue(new Alert(alertId));
+  jest
+    .spyOn(IncidentService, "findOneBy")
+    .mockResolvedValue(new Incident(incidentId));
+  jest
+    .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+    .mockResolvedValue(null);
+  jest
+    .spyOn(AIAlertInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateAlert")
+    .mockResolvedValue({ investigate: true, reason: "eligible" });
+  jest
+    .spyOn(AIIncidentInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateIncident")
+    .mockResolvedValue({ investigate: true, reason: "eligible" });
+  jest.spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus").mockResolvedValue({
+    exhausted: false,
+    limitInTokens: null,
+    usedTokensToday: 0,
+  });
+}
+
+async function trigger(subject: InvestigationSubject): Promise<boolean> {
+  return subject.alertId
+    ? AIAlertInvestigationRunner.investigateNewAlert({ projectId, alertId })
+    : AIIncidentInvestigationRunner.investigateNewIncident({
+        projectId,
+        incidentId,
+      });
+}
+
+describe("investigation enablement reasons", () => {
+  it.each(["Alert", "Incident"] as const)(
+    "explains project AI being disabled for %s",
+    async (kind: "Alert" | "Incident") => {
+      const project: Project = enabledProject();
+      project.enableAi = false;
+      jest.spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById").mockResolvedValue(project);
+      const provider: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        LlmProviderService,
+        "getLLMProviderForProject",
+      );
+      expect(
+        await AIInvestigationEngine.getDisabledReason(projectId, kind),
+      ).toBe("ai_disabled");
+      expect(
+        await AIInvestigationEngine.isEnabledForProject(projectId, kind),
+      ).toBe(false);
+      expect(provider).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    },
+  );
+  it.each(["Alert", "Incident"] as const)(
+    "distinguishes the independent %s opt-in",
+    async (kind: "Alert" | "Incident") => {
+      const project: Project = enabledProject();
+      if (kind === "Alert") {
+        project.enableAutomaticAlertInvestigation = false;
+      } else {
+        project.enableAutomaticIncidentInvestigation = false;
+      }
+      jest.spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById").mockResolvedValue(project);
+      expect(
+        await AIInvestigationEngine.getDisabledReason(projectId, kind),
+      ).toBe("automatic_investigation_disabled");
+    },
+  );
+  it("explains an unavailable provider without returning provider credentials", async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById")
+      .mockResolvedValue(enabledProject());
+    jest
+      .spyOn(LlmProviderService, "getLLMProviderForProject")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null);
+    expect(
+      await AIInvestigationEngine.getDisabledReason(projectId, "Alert"),
+    ).toBe("provider_missing");
+  });
+  it("preserves legacy unset project AI enablement with an available provider", async () => {
+    const project: Project = enabledProject();
+    delete project.enableAi;
+    jest.spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById").mockResolvedValue(project);
+    jest
+      .spyOn(LlmProviderService, "getLLMProviderForProject")
+      .mockResolvedValue(new LlmProvider());
+    expect(
+      await AIInvestigationEngine.getDisabledReason(projectId, "Incident"),
+    ).toBeNull();
+    expect(
+      await AIInvestigationEngine.isEnabledForProject(projectId, "Incident"),
+    ).toBe(true);
+  });
+  it("does not claim a missing project's AI setting is off", async () => {
+    jest.spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById").mockResolvedValue(null);
+    expect(
+      await AIInvestigationEngine.getDisabledReason(projectId, "Alert"),
+    ).toBe("eligibility_check_failed");
+  });
+});
+
+describe.each(subjects)(
+  "recorded explanation time context for %o",
+  (subject: InvestigationSubject) => {
+    it.each(configurationCodes)(
+      "describes %s as a condition at creation rather than a current setting",
+      (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        const reason: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+          InvestigationEligibility.reason(code, subject, undefined, {
+            severityName: "High",
+            minimumSeverityName: "Critical",
+          });
+        expect(reason.source).toBe("recorded");
+        expect(reason.title).toMatch(/\bwas\b/);
+        expect(reason.title).toContain("at creation");
+        expect(reason.description).toContain(
+          `this ${subject.alertId ? "alert" : "incident"} was created`,
+        );
+        expect(reason.title).not.toContain("currently");
+        expect(reason.nextStep).toMatch(/^Review /);
+      },
+    );
+    it.each([0, 1000])(
+      "describes the %s-token budget as a historical admission decision",
+      (limit: number) => {
+        const reason: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+          InvestigationEligibility.reason("daily_budget_exhausted", subject, {
+            exhausted: true,
+            limitInTokens: limit,
+            usedTokensToday: limit,
+          });
+        expect(reason.source).toBe("recorded");
+        expect(reason.title).toMatch(/\b(was|had)\b/);
+        expect(reason.description).toContain("when checked at creation");
+        expect(reason.description).toContain("No investigation was queued");
+        expect(reason.title).not.toContain("currently");
+      },
+    );
+  },
+);
+
+describe.each(subjects)(
+  "recorded decision persistence for %o",
+  (subject: InvestigationSubject) => {
+    it.each(codes)(
+      "stores %s using a first-write-only, project-scoped update without hooks",
+      async (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        const updateAlert: jest.SpyInstance = jest
+          .spyOn(AlertService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+          .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+        const updateIncident: jest.SpyInstance = jest
+          .spyOn(IncidentService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+          .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+        await InvestigationEligibility.recordSkipped(subject, code);
+        const update: jest.SpyInstance = subject.alertId
+          ? updateAlert
+          : updateIncident;
+        expect(update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+          id: subject.alertId || subject.incidentId,
+          expectedData: { projectId, aiInvestigationDecision: null },
+          data: {
+            aiInvestigationDecision: expect.objectContaining({
+              code,
+              source: "recorded",
+              title: expect.any(String),
+              nextStep: expect.any(String),
+              evaluatedAt: expect.any(String),
+            }),
+          },
+          skipUpdateDateColumn: true,
+        });
+        expect(
+          subject.alertId ? updateIncident : updateAlert,
+        ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it("does not propagate a failed decision write", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AlertService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("storage failed"));
+      jest
+        .spyOn(IncidentService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("storage failed"));
+      await expect(
+        InvestigationEligibility.recordSkipped(subject, "provider_missing"),
+      ).resolves.toBeUndefined();
+    });
+    it("retains the original reason even after configuration changes", async () => {
+      const decision: InvestigationNotStartedReason = {
+        ...InvestigationEligibility.reason(
+          "automatic_investigation_disabled",
+          subject,
+        ),
+        evaluatedAt: "2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z",
+      };
+      const alert: Alert = new Alert(alertId);
+      alert.aiInvestigationDecision = decision;
+      const incident: Incident = new Incident(incidentId);
+      incident.aiInvestigationDecision = decision;
+      jest.spyOn(AlertService, "findOneBy").mockResolvedValue(alert);
+      jest.spyOn(IncidentService, "findOneBy").mockResolvedValue(incident);
+      const current: jest.SpyInstance = jest
+        .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+        .mockResolvedValue(null);
+      const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+      expect(result).toEqual(decision);
+      expect(result.title).toBe(
+        `Automatic ${subject.alertId ? "alert" : "incident"} investigation was off at creation`,
+      );
+      expect(result.description).toContain("was not enabled");
+      expect(result.description).toContain("was created");
+      expect(result.title).not.toContain("is turned off");
+      expect(result.nextStep).toMatch(/^Review /);
+      expect(current).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(
+        subject.alertId ? AlertService.findOneBy : IncidentService.findOneBy,
+      ).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          query: {
+            _id: (subject.alertId || subject.incidentId)!.toString(),
+            projectId,
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+    });
+  },
+);
+
+describe.each(subjects)(
+  "historical no-run fallback for %o",
+  (subject: InvestigationSubject) => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockMissingDecision();
+    });
+    it.each([
+      "ai_disabled",
+      "automatic_investigation_disabled",
+      "provider_missing",
+    ] as const)(
+      "labels %s as current conditions, never historical proof",
+      async (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+          .mockResolvedValue(code);
+        const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+          await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+        expect(result.code).toBe(code);
+        expect(result.source).toBe("current_configuration");
+        expect(result.title).toContain("currently");
+        expect(result.description).toMatch(/\bis (not )?currently\b/);
+        expect(result.description).not.toContain(
+          "so its automatic investigation did not start",
+        );
+        expect(result.description).toContain(
+          "do not confirm why this record was skipped at creation",
+        );
+        expect(AIService.getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it.each(["severity_below_threshold", "monitor_cooldown"] as const)(
+      "uses the real subject gate's %s outcome",
+      async (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIAlertInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateAlert")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            investigate: false,
+            reason: "blocked",
+            notStartedCode: code,
+          });
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIIncidentInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateIncident")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            investigate: false,
+            reason: "blocked",
+            notStartedCode: code,
+          });
+        const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+          await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+        expect(result.code).toBe(code);
+        expect(result.source).toBe("current_configuration");
+        expect(result.title).toContain("current");
+        expect(result.description).toContain(
+          "the original decision was not recorded",
+        );
+        if (code === "severity_below_threshold") {
+          expect(result.description).toContain("severity does not meet");
+          expect(result.description).not.toContain("severity did not meet");
+        } else {
+          expect(result.description).toContain("right now");
+          expect(result.description).not.toContain(
+            "did not start another investigation",
+          );
+        }
+        expect(AIService.getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it.each([0, 1000])(
+      "explains the current %s-token budget without claiming a historical skip",
+      async (limit: number) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            exhausted: true,
+            usedTokensToday: limit,
+            limitInTokens: limit,
+          });
+        const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+          await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+        expect(result.code).toBe("daily_budget_exhausted");
+        expect(result.source).toBe("current_configuration");
+        expect(result.title).toContain("currently");
+        expect(result.description).toContain(limit.toLocaleString("en-US"));
+        expect(result.description).toContain("has used");
+        expect(result.description).toContain(
+          "the original decision was not recorded",
+        );
+        expect(result.description).not.toContain("No investigation was queued");
+        expect(result.nextStep).toContain("not automatically retried");
+        expect(AIService.getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+          projectId,
+          { incidentId: subject.incidentId, alertId: subject.alertId },
+        );
+      },
+    );
+    it("preserves severity names verbatim in both historical and current explanations", async () => {
+      const details: {
+        severityName: string;
+        minimumSeverityName: string;
+      } = {
+        severityName: "High is available",
+        minimumSeverityName: "Critical was not enabled",
+      };
+      const recorded: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        InvestigationEligibility.reason(
+          "severity_below_threshold",
+          subject,
+          undefined,
+          details,
+        );
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIAlertInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateAlert")
+        .mockResolvedValue({
+          investigate: false,
+          reason: "below threshold",
+          notStartedCode: "severity_below_threshold",
+          notStartedDetails: details,
+        });
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIIncidentInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateIncident")
+        .mockResolvedValue({
+          investigate: false,
+          reason: "below threshold",
+          notStartedCode: "severity_below_threshold",
+          notStartedDetails: details,
+        });
+      const current: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+      for (const reason of [recorded, current]) {
+        expect(reason.description).toContain(details.severityName);
+        expect(reason.description).toContain(details.minimumSeverityName);
+      }
+      expect(recorded.description).toContain("severity did not meet");
+      expect(current.description).toContain("severity does not meet");
+    });
+    it("reports no historical reason when all current checks pass and performs no writes", async () => {
+      const update: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        AlertService,
+        "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks",
+      );
+      const incidentUpdate: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        IncidentService,
+        "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks",
+      );
+      const enqueue: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        AIInvestigationQueue,
+        "enqueue",
+      );
+      const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+      expect(result.code).toBe("no_run_recorded");
+      expect(result.source).toBe("unknown");
+      expect(result.description).toContain("current");
+      expect(result.nextStep).toContain("does not backfill");
+      expect(update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(incidentUpdate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(enqueue).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+    it("returns a safe unknown explanation on an eligibility error", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new Error("provider key secret-token host private.internal"),
+        );
+      const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+      expect(result.source).toBe("unknown");
+      expect(result.code).toBe("eligibility_check_failed");
+      expect(JSON.stringify(result)).not.toMatch(
+        /secret-token|private.internal/,
+      );
+    });
+  },
+);
+
+describe.each(subjects)(
+  "creation hook and queue decision integration for %o",
+  (subject: InvestigationSubject) => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockMissingDecision();
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AlertService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+      jest
+        .spyOn(IncidentService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+      jest.spyOn(Semaphore, "lock").mockResolvedValue({} as never);
+      jest.spyOn(Semaphore, "release").mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIRunService, "create")
+        .mockResolvedValue(new AIRun(ObjectID.generate()));
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIInvestigationQueue, "processRun")
+        .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    });
+    function expectRecorded(code: InvestigationNotStartedCode): void {
+      expect(
+        subject.alertId
+          ? AlertService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks
+          : IncidentService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks,
+      ).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          data: {
+            aiInvestigationDecision: expect.objectContaining({
+              code,
+              source: "recorded",
+            }),
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+    }
+    it.each([
+      "ai_disabled",
+      "automatic_investigation_disabled",
+      "provider_missing",
+    ] as const)(
+      "records disabled admission %s",
+      async (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+          .mockResolvedValue(code);
+        expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+        expectRecorded(code);
+        expect(AIRunService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it.each(["severity_below_threshold", "monitor_cooldown"] as const)(
+      "records subject gate %s without creating a fake run",
+      async (code: InvestigationNotStartedCode) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIAlertInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateAlert")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            investigate: false,
+            reason: "blocked",
+            notStartedCode: code,
+          });
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIIncidentInvestigationRunner, "shouldInvestigateIncident")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            investigate: false,
+            reason: "blocked",
+            notStartedCode: code,
+          });
+        expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+        expectRecorded(code);
+        expect(AIRunService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it.each([0, 1000])(
+      "records an exhausted budget of %s and no run",
+      async (limit: number) => {
+        jest
+          .spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus")
+          .mockResolvedValue({
+            exhausted: true,
+            usedTokensToday: limit,
+            limitInTokens: limit,
+          });
+        expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+        expectRecorded("daily_budget_exhausted");
+        expect(AIRunService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+    it("records the budget-check error category without exposing its raw error", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("secret: budget storage offline"));
+      expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+      expectRecorded("budget_check_failed");
+      expect(AIRunService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      const update: jest.Mock = (
+        subject.alertId
+          ? AlertService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks
+          : IncidentService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks
+      ) as jest.Mock;
+      expect(JSON.stringify(update.mock.calls)).not.toContain("secret");
+    });
+    it("records durable queue write failure", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIRunService, "create")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("insert failed"));
+      expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+      expectRecorded("enqueue_failed");
+      expect(AIInvestigationQueue.processRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+    it("keeps the failed admission result even if diagnostic persistence fails", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AlertService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("storage failed"));
+      jest
+        .spyOn(IncidentService, "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("storage failed"));
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIRunService, "create")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("insert failed"));
+      await expect(trigger(subject)).resolves.toBe(false);
+      expectRecorded("enqueue_failed");
+    });
+    it("does not write a skip reason for successfully enqueued investigations", async () => {
+      expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(true);
+      expect(AlertService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(
+        IncidentService.updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks,
+      ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(AIInvestigationQueue.processRun).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+    it("records unexpected eligibility failures without stranding remediation", async () => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIInvestigationEngine, "getDisabledReason")
+        .mockRejectedValue(new Error("unexpected"));
+      expect(await trigger(subject)).toBe(false);
+      expectRecorded("eligibility_check_failed");
+      expect(AIRunService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+  },
+);
+
+describe("investigation diagnostic boundaries", () => {
+  it.each(subjects)(
+    "survives an unavailable decision column during deployment for %o",
+    async (subject: InvestigationSubject) => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AlertService, "findOneBy")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new Error("column aiInvestigationDecision does not exist"),
+        );
+      jest
+        .spyOn(IncidentService, "findOneBy")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new Error("column aiInvestigationDecision does not exist"),
+        );
+      const result: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+        await InvestigationEligibility.getNotStartedReason(subject);
+      expect(result.source).toBe("unknown");
+      expect(result.code).toBe("eligibility_check_failed");
+      expect(JSON.stringify(result)).not.toContain("column");
+      expect(result.description).toContain("could not be loaded");
+      expect(result.description).not.toContain("was not recorded");
+    },
+  );
+  it.each([false, true])(
+    "does not write a creation decision for non-automatic enqueue (remediation: %s)",
+    async (remediation: boolean) => {
+      jest
+        .spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus")
+        .mockResolvedValue({
+          exhausted: true,
+          usedTokensToday: 0,
+          limitInTokens: 0,
+        });
+      const alertUpdate: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        AlertService,
+        "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks",
+      );
+      const incidentUpdate: jest.SpyInstance = jest.spyOn(
+        IncidentService,
+        "updateColumnsByIdWithoutHooks",
+      );
+      expect(
+        await AIInvestigationQueue.enqueue({
+          projectId,
+          subjectAlertId: alertId,
+          ...(remediation
+            ? { subjectAutoRemediationSuggestionId: ObjectID.generate() }
+            : {}),
+        }),
+      ).toBeNull();
+      expect(alertUpdate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(incidentUpdate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    },
+  );
+  it("retains actual severity names and the configured cooldown in the recorded explanation", () => {
+    const severity: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+      InvestigationEligibility.reason(
+        "severity_below_threshold",
+        subjects[0]!,
+        undefined,
+        { severityName: "High", minimumSeverityName: "Critical" },
+      );
+    expect(severity.description).toContain("High");
+    expect(severity.description).toContain("Critical");
+    const cooldown: InvestigationNotStartedReason =
+      InvestigationEligibility.reason(
+        "monitor_cooldown",
+        subjects[0]!,
+        undefined,
+        { cooldownWindowMinutes: 75 },
+      );
+    expect(cooldown.description).toContain("75-minute");
+    expect(cooldown.title).not.toContain("covers");
+  });
+  it("does not let a failed caller diagnostic callback make enqueue throw", async () => {
+    jest.spyOn(AIService, "getAutonomousDailyBudgetStatus").mockResolvedValue({
+      exhausted: true,
+      usedTokensToday: 0,
+      limitInTokens: 0,
+    });
+    await expect(
+      AIInvestigationQueue.enqueue({
+        projectId,
+        subjectAlertId: alertId,
+        onNotEnqueued: async () => {
+          throw new Error("diagnostics unavailable");
+        },
+      }),
+    ).resolves.toBeNull();
+  });
+});