@oneuptime/common 12.0.8 → 12.0.9

package/Tests/Server/Services/OnCallNotificationFallback.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,1744 @@
+import OnCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineService from "../../../Server/Services/OnCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineService";
+import OnCallNotificationAlertingService from "../../../Server/Services/OnCallNotificationAlertingService";
+import ProjectService from "../../../Server/Services/ProjectService";
+import UserCallService from "../../../Server/Services/UserCallService";
+import UserEmailService from "../../../Server/Services/UserEmailService";
+import UserNotificationRuleService, {
+  ExecuteFallbackNotificationOptions,
+  ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions,
+  FALLBACK_NOTIFICATION_CLAIM_KEY,
+  FallbackNotificationOutcome,
+  FallbackNotificationResult,
+} from "../../../Server/Services/UserNotificationRuleService";
+import UserOnCallLogService, {
+  NO_NOTIFICATION_RULES_STATUS_MESSAGE,
+} from "../../../Server/Services/UserOnCallLogService";
+import UserPushService from "../../../Server/Services/UserPushService";
+import UserService from "../../../Server/Services/UserService";
+import UserSmsService from "../../../Server/Services/UserSmsService";
+import UserTelegramService from "../../../Server/Services/UserTelegramService";
+import UserWebhookService from "../../../Server/Services/UserWebhookService";
+import UserWhatsAppService from "../../../Server/Services/UserWhatsAppService";
+import logger from "../../../Server/Utils/Logger";
+import Project from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Project";
+import UserNotificationRule from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/UserNotificationRule";
+import UserOnCallLog from "../../../Models/DatabaseModels/UserOnCallLog";
+import Email from "../../../Types/Email";
+import Name from "../../../Types/Name";
+import NotificationRuleType from "../../../Types/NotificationRule/NotificationRuleType";
+import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus from "../../../Types/OnCallDutyPolicy/OnCalDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus";
+import Phone from "../../../Types/Phone";
+import UserNotificationEventType from "../../../Types/UserNotification/UserNotificationEventType";
+import UserNotificationExecutionStatus from "../../../Types/UserNotification/UserNotificationExecutionStatus";
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, test } from "@jest/globals";
+
+/*
+ * The verified-method fallback: what happens when a responder is paged and has
+ * NO notification rule for the (ruleType x severity) that fired.
+ *
+ * Before Phase 1 that was a dead-end - an Error row nobody reads, no send, and
+ * an escalation timer running down as though the responder had simply declined
+ * to acknowledge (Gap C). The fallback pages them anyway, on whatever they have
+ * verified. This file pins the four things about it that are easy to get subtly,
+ * silently wrong:
+ *
+ *   1. WHICH CHANNELS. Zero-cost first: a responder with a verified push device
+ *      and a verified email gets both, because there is no reason to choose and
+ *      neither costs the project anything. Only a responder with neither is
+ *      worth spending money on, and then exactly once, down the ladder
+ *      SMS -> Call -> WhatsApp -> Telegram -> Webhook - and only through
+ *      channels the PROJECT still has switched on. That last clause is the one
+ *      with a bill attached: SmsService and CallService check their project flag
+ *      at send time, but WhatsApp and Telegram only check theirs when the method
+ *      is created, so a project that switched WhatsApp off would be billed by a
+ *      fallback that did not look for itself (spec constraint 7). It is driven
+ *      per channel below.
+ *
+ *   2. ONE DELIVERY CALL PER CHANNEL. This is the highest-value assertion in the
+ *      file (spec constraint 1). deliverNotificationForRule keeps ONE mutable
+ *      UserOnCallLogTimeline instance and mutates it as it walks its channel
+ *      blocks; after the first create() that instance carries an _id, so a
+ *      second create() with it UPDATEs the row it already wrote instead of
+ *      inserting a new one. A fallback that looped channels inside a single
+ *      delivery call would therefore overwrite the first channel's timeline row
+ *      with the second's - one page would vanish from the record entirely. So:
+ *      two channels means two calls, each with its OWN freshly built rule.
+ *
+ *   3. THE UNSAVED RULE. Each channel is delivered through a UserNotificationRule
+ *      assembled in memory and never persisted - the user did not ask for this
+ *      rule, and writing it would rewrite their configuration behind their back.
+ *      It has to carry the method RELATION (rule.userEmail as a loaded UserEmail
+ *      with .email and .isVerified), not merely the FK, because every channel
+ *      block reads the relation and never dereferences the id: a rule with only
+ *      userEmailId set sends nothing at all, quietly.
+ *
+ *   4. THE OUTCOME THE CALLER ACTS ON. UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error is
+ *      TERMINAL - ExecutePendingExecutions selects Executing and
+ *      TimeoutStuckExecutions selects Started, so nothing re-selects an Error
+ *      log. "This responder has nothing we can page them on" is worth burning
+ *      the log for; "the send raised" is not the same thing at all, and both are
+ *      notified:false. Hence the three-way FallbackNotificationOutcome, and
+ *      hence the wiring assertions in section (F).
+ *
+ * Nothing here touches a database or a sender: deliverNotificationForRule is
+ * stubbed at the service boundary (it fans out into template generation, short
+ * links, seven providers and the timeline writer), and every lookup is a
+ * jest.spyOn. What is under test is the fallback's own decision-making.
+ */
+
+const PROJECT_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
+);
+const USER_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID("22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222");
+const LOG_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID("33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333");
+const INCIDENT_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
+);
+const POLICY_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555",
+);
+const TIMELINE_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666",
+);
+const INCIDENT_SEVERITY_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777",
+);
+
+const EMAIL_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a1a1a1a1-a1a1-4a1a-8a1a-a1a1a1a1a1a1",
+);
+const PUSH_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a2a2a2a2-a2a2-4a2a-8a2a-a2a2a2a2a2a2",
+);
+const SMS_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a3a3a3a3-a3a3-4a3a-8a3a-a3a3a3a3a3a3",
+);
+const CALL_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a4a4a4a4-a4a4-4a4a-8a4a-a4a4a4a4a4a4",
+);
+const WHATSAPP_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a5a5a5a5-a5a5-4a5a-8a5a-a5a5a5a5a5a5",
+);
+const TELEGRAM_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a6a6a6a6-a6a6-4a6a-8a6a-a6a6a6a6a6a6",
+);
+const WEBHOOK_METHOD_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "a7a7a7a7-a7a7-4a7a-8a7a-a7a7a7a7a7a7",
+);
+
+const RESPONDER_EMAIL: string = "responder@company.com";
+const SEVERITY_NAME: string = "Sev4";
+const RESPONDER_NAME: string = "Jane Doe";
+
+/*
+ * The four project switches the paid ladder consults, and the flag key each
+ * channel is gated on. Kept as one table because the "is this channel allowed"
+ * question is asked identically for all four and answered in four separate
+ * blocks of production code - exactly the shape that drifts.
+ */
+type PaidChannelName = "SMS" | "Call" | "WhatsApp" | "Telegram";
+
+const SMS_FLAG: string = "enableSmsNotifications";
+const CALL_FLAG: string = "enableCallNotifications";
+const WHATSAPP_FLAG: string = "enableWhatsAppNotifications";
+const TELEGRAM_FLAG: string = "enableTelegramNotifications";
+
+/*
+ * A project row as chooseFallbackChannels reads it. Every paid channel starts
+ * DISABLED so that a test which forgets to enable one cannot accidentally bill
+ * for it - the interesting default is the restrictive one.
+ */
+function makeProject(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}): Project {
+  return {
+    _id: PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+    enableSmsNotifications: false,
+    enableCallNotifications: false,
+    enableWhatsAppNotifications: false,
+    enableTelegramNotifications: false,
+    ...overrides,
+  } as unknown as Project;
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedPush(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: PUSH_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: PUSH_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    deviceToken: "device-token",
+    deviceType: "iOS",
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedEmail(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: EMAIL_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: EMAIL_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    email: new Email(RESPONDER_EMAIL),
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedSms(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: SMS_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: SMS_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    phone: new Phone("+11234567890"),
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedCall(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: CALL_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: CALL_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    phone: new Phone("+11234567891"),
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedWhatsApp(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: WHATSAPP_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: WHATSAPP_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    phone: new Phone("+11234567892"),
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeVerifiedTelegram(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: TELEGRAM_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: TELEGRAM_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    telegramChatId: "123456",
+    telegramUserHandle: "@responder",
+    isVerified: true,
+  };
+}
+
+/*
+ * Deliberately carries no isVerified: UserWebhook has no such column, so
+ * presence of a URL is the whole gate. A fixture that invented an isVerified
+ * would hide a regression that started requiring one.
+ */
+function makeWebhook(): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return {
+    id: WEBHOOK_METHOD_ID,
+    _id: WEBHOOK_METHOD_ID.toString(),
+    webhookUrl: "https://hooks.example.com/on-call",
+    name: "Pager bridge",
+    secret: "s3cr3t",
+  };
+}
+
+/*
+ * deliverNotificationForRule is private - it is the seam the fallback reuses
+ * from executeNotificationRuleItem, not part of the service's public surface.
+ * Spying on it needs a structural view of the singleton rather than a widened
+ * class, so the cast lives here and nowhere else.
+ */
+interface UserNotificationRuleServiceInternals {
+  deliverNotificationForRule: (
+    notificationRuleItem: UserNotificationRule,
+    options: ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions,
+  ) => Promise<boolean>;
+}
+
+function ruleServiceInternals(): UserNotificationRuleServiceInternals {
+  return UserNotificationRuleService as unknown as UserNotificationRuleServiceInternals;
+}
+
+interface UserOnCallLogServiceInternals {
+  handleNoMatchingNotificationRule: (data: {
+    createdItem: UserOnCallLog;
+    notificationRuleType: NotificationRuleType;
+    incidentSeverityId: ObjectID | undefined;
+    alertSeverityId: ObjectID | undefined;
+    severityName: string;
+  }) => Promise<void>;
+}
+
+function fallbackOptions(
+  overrides: Partial<ExecuteFallbackNotificationOptions> = {},
+): ExecuteFallbackNotificationOptions {
+  return {
+    userId: USER_ID,
+    projectId: PROJECT_ID,
+    userOnCallLogId: LOG_ID,
+    ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+    severityName: SEVERITY_NAME,
+    userNotificationLogId: LOG_ID,
+    userNotificationEventType: UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated,
+    triggeredByIncidentId: INCIDENT_ID,
+    onCallPolicyId: POLICY_ID,
+    ...overrides,
+  };
+}
+
+/* The query bundle every method lookup is handed. */
+interface FindOneByArg {
+  query: Record<string, unknown>;
+  select: Record<string, unknown>;
+  props: { isRoot: boolean };
+}
+
+function queryOf(spy: jest.SpyInstance): Record<string, unknown> {
+  return (spy.mock.calls[0]![0] as FindOneByArg).query;
+}
+
+function flushMicrotasks(): Promise<void> {
+  return Promise.resolve()
+    .then((): Promise<void> => {
+      return Promise.resolve();
+    })
+    .then((): Promise<void> => {
+      return Promise.resolve();
+    });
+}
+
+/*
+ * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+ * (A)-(E) executeFallbackNotification itself.
+ * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ */
+
+describe("UserNotificationRuleService.executeFallbackNotification", () => {
+  let claimSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let deliverSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let ruleCreateSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let pushFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let emailFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let smsFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let callFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let whatsAppFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let telegramFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let webhookFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let projectFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    jest.spyOn(logger, "error").mockImplementation((): void => {
+      return undefined;
+    });
+    jest.spyOn(logger, "warn").mockImplementation((): void => {
+      return undefined;
+    });
+
+    claimSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserOnCallLogService, "claimNotificationExecution")
+      .mockResolvedValue(true as never);
+
+    /*
+     * Stubbed at the service boundary. The real method fans out into template
+     * generation, short-link creation, seven providers and the timeline writer;
+     * its return value ("was a page actually handed to a sender") is the only
+     * part of it the fallback reasons about.
+     */
+    deliverSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(ruleServiceInternals(), "deliverNotificationForRule")
+      .mockResolvedValue(true as never);
+
+    ruleCreateSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserNotificationRuleService, "create")
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined as never);
+
+    // A responder with nothing configured: every test opts IN to its methods.
+    pushFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserPushService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    emailFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserEmailService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    smsFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserSmsService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    callFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserCallService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    whatsAppFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserWhatsAppService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    telegramFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserTelegramService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    webhookFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserWebhookService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+
+    projectFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById")
+      .mockResolvedValue(makeProject() as never);
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  function runFallback(
+    overrides: Partial<ExecuteFallbackNotificationOptions> = {},
+  ): Promise<FallbackNotificationResult> {
+    return UserNotificationRuleService.executeFallbackNotification(
+      fallbackOptions(overrides),
+    );
+  }
+
+  function deliveredRules(): Array<UserNotificationRule> {
+    return deliverSpy.mock.calls.map(
+      (call: Array<unknown>): UserNotificationRule => {
+        return call[0] as UserNotificationRule;
+      },
+    );
+  }
+
+  function deliveredOptions(): Array<ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions> {
+    return deliverSpy.mock.calls.map(
+      (call: Array<unknown>): ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions => {
+        return call[1] as ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions;
+      },
+    );
+  }
+
+  function paidChannelFindSpy(channelName: PaidChannelName): jest.SpyInstance {
+    const byChannel: Record<PaidChannelName, jest.SpyInstance> = {
+      SMS: smsFindSpy,
+      Call: callFindSpy,
+      WhatsApp: whatsAppFindSpy,
+      Telegram: telegramFindSpy,
+    };
+
+    return byChannel[channelName];
+  }
+
+  function everyPaidChannelFindSpy(): Array<jest.SpyInstance> {
+    return [smsFindSpy, callFindSpy, whatsAppFindSpy, telegramFindSpy];
+  }
+
+  function giveResponderEveryPaidMethod(): void {
+    smsFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedSms() as never);
+    callFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedCall() as never);
+    whatsAppFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedWhatsApp() as never);
+    telegramFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedTelegram() as never);
+    webhookFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeWebhook() as never);
+  }
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (A) Channel selection - zero-cost channels.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("channel selection: the zero-cost pair", () => {
+    test("a responder with a verified push device AND a verified email gets BOTH", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * Both, and in this order: push and email cost nothing, so there is no
+       * reason to pick between them and every reason to maximise the chance of
+       * reaching a human who is not looking at their phone.
+       */
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Push", "Email"]);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(true);
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+    });
+
+    test("a verified push device alone is enough - no paid channel is even looked up", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Push"]);
+      for (const spy of everyPaidChannelFindSpy()) {
+        expect(spy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      }
+      expect(webhookFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("a verified email alone is enough - no paid channel is even looked up", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Email"]);
+      for (const spy of everyPaidChannelFindSpy()) {
+        expect(spy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      }
+    });
+
+    test("with a zero-cost channel available the project settings are never even read", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * The project row is only consulted to decide whether a PAID channel may
+       * be used. Reaching it at all on this path would mean the ladder is being
+       * evaluated when it should not be.
+       */
+      expect(projectFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("the push lookup is scoped to this project, this user, and verified devices only", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const query: Record<string, unknown> = queryOf(pushFindSpy);
+      expect((query["projectId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect((query["userId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(USER_ID.toString());
+      /*
+       * The verification predicate lives in the QUERY, which is the only place
+       * it can live: nothing downstream re-checks it before the fallback builds
+       * a rule around the row. Dropping it would page an unverified device.
+       */
+      expect(query["isVerified"]).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("the email lookup is scoped to this project, this user, and verified addresses only", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const query: Record<string, unknown> = queryOf(emailFindSpy);
+      expect((query["projectId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect((query["userId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(USER_ID.toString());
+      expect(query["isVerified"]).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (A continued) Channel selection - the paid ladder and its project gates.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("channel selection: the paid ladder", () => {
+    test.each<[PaidChannelName, string, Record<string, unknown>]>([
+      ["SMS", SMS_FLAG, makeVerifiedSms()],
+      ["Call", CALL_FLAG, makeVerifiedCall()],
+      ["WhatsApp", WHATSAPP_FLAG, makeVerifiedWhatsApp()],
+      ["Telegram", TELEGRAM_FLAG, makeVerifiedTelegram()],
+    ])(
+      "%s is used when the responder has it verified and the project has it enabled",
+      async (
+        channelName: PaidChannelName,
+        flagKey: string,
+        method: Record<string, unknown>,
+      ): Promise<void> => {
+        projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(
+          makeProject({ [flagKey]: true }) as never,
+        );
+        paidChannelFindSpy(channelName).mockResolvedValue(method as never);
+
+        const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+        expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([channelName]);
+        expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+        // Exactly one paid channel, never a spree down the ladder.
+        expect(deliverSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      },
+    );
+
+    test.each<[PaidChannelName, string, Record<string, unknown>]>([
+      ["SMS", SMS_FLAG, makeVerifiedSms()],
+      ["Call", CALL_FLAG, makeVerifiedCall()],
+      ["WhatsApp", WHATSAPP_FLAG, makeVerifiedWhatsApp()],
+      ["Telegram", TELEGRAM_FLAG, makeVerifiedTelegram()],
+    ])(
+      "%s is skipped - not even queried - when the project has it disabled",
+      async (
+        channelName: PaidChannelName,
+        _flagKey: string,
+        method: Record<string, unknown>,
+      ): Promise<void> => {
+        /*
+         * This is the constraint that stops a fallback billing a project that
+         * deliberately switched a channel off. Only SmsService and CallService
+         * enforce their flag at send time; WhatsApp and Telegram check theirs
+         * when a method is CREATED, so by the time a fallback picks one up the
+         * project's answer has never been asked. It is asked here.
+         */
+        projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeProject() as never);
+        paidChannelFindSpy(channelName).mockResolvedValue(method as never);
+
+        const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+        expect(paidChannelFindSpy(channelName)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+        expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+        expect(result.outcome).toBe(
+          FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+        );
+        expect(deliverSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      },
+    );
+
+    test("with everything available and everything enabled, SMS wins and the rest are never queried", async () => {
+      giveResponderEveryPaidMethod();
+      projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(
+        makeProject({
+          [SMS_FLAG]: true,
+          [CALL_FLAG]: true,
+          [WHATSAPP_FLAG]: true,
+          [TELEGRAM_FLAG]: true,
+        }) as never,
+      );
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["SMS"]);
+      expect(callFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(whatsAppFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(telegramFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(webhookFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test.each<[string, Record<string, unknown>, string]>([
+      [
+        "SMS off",
+        { [CALL_FLAG]: true, [WHATSAPP_FLAG]: true, [TELEGRAM_FLAG]: true },
+        "Call",
+      ],
+      [
+        "SMS and Call off",
+        { [WHATSAPP_FLAG]: true, [TELEGRAM_FLAG]: true },
+        "WhatsApp",
+      ],
+      ["SMS, Call and WhatsApp off", { [TELEGRAM_FLAG]: true }, "Telegram"],
+      ["every paid channel off", {}, "Webhook"],
+    ])(
+      "with %s, the ladder falls through to %s",
+      async (
+        _label: string,
+        flags: Record<string, unknown>,
+        expectedChannel: string,
+      ): Promise<void> => {
+        giveResponderEveryPaidMethod();
+        projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeProject(flags) as never);
+
+        const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+        expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([expectedChannel]);
+      },
+    );
+
+    test.each<[PaidChannelName, string, Record<string, unknown>]>([
+      ["SMS", SMS_FLAG, makeVerifiedSms()],
+      ["Call", CALL_FLAG, makeVerifiedCall()],
+      ["WhatsApp", WHATSAPP_FLAG, makeVerifiedWhatsApp()],
+      ["Telegram", TELEGRAM_FLAG, makeVerifiedTelegram()],
+    ])(
+      "the %s lookup is verification-gated and scoped to this responder",
+      async (
+        channelName: PaidChannelName,
+        flagKey: string,
+        method: Record<string, unknown>,
+      ): Promise<void> => {
+        projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(
+          makeProject({ [flagKey]: true }) as never,
+        );
+        paidChannelFindSpy(channelName).mockResolvedValue(method as never);
+
+        await runFallback();
+
+        const query: Record<string, unknown> = queryOf(
+          paidChannelFindSpy(channelName),
+        );
+        expect(query["isVerified"]).toBe(true);
+        expect((query["projectId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+          PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+        );
+        expect((query["userId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+          USER_ID.toString(),
+        );
+      },
+    );
+
+    test("the paid ladder is only reached when BOTH zero-cost channels are missing", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      giveResponderEveryPaidMethod();
+      projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(
+        makeProject({ [SMS_FLAG]: true }) as never,
+      );
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Push"]);
+      expect(smsFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (A continued) Channel selection - the webhook backstop.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("channel selection: the webhook backstop", () => {
+    test("a webhook qualifies on presence alone - it has no verification concept", async () => {
+      webhookFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeWebhook() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Webhook"]);
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+    });
+
+    test("the webhook lookup carries NO isVerified predicate", async () => {
+      webhookFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeWebhook() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const query: Record<string, unknown> = queryOf(webhookFindSpy);
+      /*
+       * UserWebhook has no isVerified column. Adding the predicate to this
+       * query for symmetry with the others would match nothing at all, and the
+       * backstop would silently stop existing.
+       */
+      expect(Object.keys(query).sort()).toEqual(["projectId", "userId"]);
+      expect(query["isVerified"]).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+
+    test("a webhook is still used when every paid channel is switched off - there is no flag for it", async () => {
+      giveResponderEveryPaidMethod();
+      projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeProject() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Webhook"]);
+      for (const spy of everyPaidChannelFindSpy()) {
+        expect(spy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      }
+    });
+
+    test("a project row that cannot be read bills nothing and still reaches the webhook", async () => {
+      projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+      giveResponderEveryPaidMethod();
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * `project?.enableSmsNotifications` on a null project is falsy, so a
+       * deleted or unreadable project fails CLOSED for everything with a bill
+       * attached and open for the one channel that has none.
+       */
+      for (const spy of everyPaidChannelFindSpy()) {
+        expect(spy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      }
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Webhook"]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (B) One delivery call per channel - spec constraint 1.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("one delivery call per channel", () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+    });
+
+    test("two chosen channels means deliverNotificationForRule is called TWICE", async () => {
+      await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * Not once with two methods on one rule. deliverNotificationForRule keeps
+       * a single mutable UserOnCallLogTimeline instance across its channel
+       * blocks, and that instance carries an _id after the first create(); a
+       * second create() with it UPDATEs the first row instead of inserting a
+       * second. Two channels inside one call would therefore leave ONE timeline
+       * row describing the second page and no trace of the first.
+       */
+      expect(deliverSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+    });
+
+    test("the two calls are handed DIFFERENT rule instances", async () => {
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const rules: Array<UserNotificationRule> = deliveredRules();
+      expect(rules).toHaveLength(2);
+      expect(rules[0]).not.toBe(rules[1]);
+    });
+
+    test("each rule carries exactly ONE method relation", async () => {
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const rules: Array<UserNotificationRule> = deliveredRules();
+      const pushRule: UserNotificationRule = rules[0]!;
+      const emailRule: UserNotificationRule = rules[1]!;
+
+      expect(pushRule.userPush).toBeDefined();
+      expect(pushRule.userEmail).toBeUndefined();
+      expect(pushRule.userEmailId).toBeUndefined();
+
+      expect(emailRule.userEmail).toBeDefined();
+      expect(emailRule.userPush).toBeUndefined();
+      expect(emailRule.userPushId).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+
+    test("no rule ever carries a second channel's method (the multiplexed-rule regression)", async () => {
+      await runFallback();
+
+      for (const rule of deliveredRules()) {
+        const methodsOnRule: Array<unknown> = [
+          rule.userEmail,
+          rule.userPush,
+          rule.userSms,
+          rule.userCall,
+          rule.userWhatsApp,
+          rule.userTelegram,
+          rule.userWebhook,
+        ].filter((method: unknown): boolean => {
+          return Boolean(method);
+        });
+
+        expect(methodsOnRule).toHaveLength(1);
+      }
+    });
+
+    test("both calls receive the very same options bundle the caller handed in", async () => {
+      const options: ExecuteFallbackNotificationOptions = fallbackOptions();
+
+      await UserNotificationRuleService.executeFallbackNotification(options);
+
+      const forwarded: Array<ExecuteNotificationRuleOptions> =
+        deliveredOptions();
+      /*
+       * Identity, not shape: everything that attributes the page back to its
+       * escalation (the incident id, the policy, the escalation rule, the
+       * on-call timeline row) rides in this object, and both channels have to
+       * describe the same page.
+       */
+      expect(forwarded[0]).toBe(options);
+      expect(forwarded[1]).toBe(options);
+    });
+
+    test("a single chosen channel produces exactly one call", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      expect(deliverSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (C) The unsaved rule.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("the rule handed to delivery is built in memory and never saved", () => {
+    test("the method RELATION is populated, not merely the foreign key", async () => {
+      const email: Record<string, unknown> = makeVerifiedEmail();
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(email as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const rule: UserNotificationRule = deliveredRules()[0]!;
+
+      /*
+       * Every channel block reads the relation (`userEmail?.email &&
+       * userEmail?.isVerified`) and never dereferences the id. A rule carrying
+       * only userEmailId would sail through delivery sending absolutely
+       * nothing, and the fallback would then report a channel it never used.
+       */
+      expect(rule.userEmail).toBe(email);
+      expect(rule.userEmail!.email!.toString()).toBe(RESPONDER_EMAIL);
+      expect(rule.userEmail!.isVerified).toBe(true);
+      // ...and the FK too, so the row is self-consistent if it is ever read.
+      expect(rule.userEmailId!.toString()).toBe(EMAIL_METHOD_ID.toString());
+    });
+
+    test("the push relation is populated with the device the sender needs", async () => {
+      const push: Record<string, unknown> = makeVerifiedPush();
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(push as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const rule: UserNotificationRule = deliveredRules()[0]!;
+      expect(rule.userPush).toBe(push);
+      expect(rule.userPush!.deviceToken).toBe("device-token");
+      expect(rule.userPush!.isVerified).toBe(true);
+      expect(rule.userPushId!.toString()).toBe(PUSH_METHOD_ID.toString());
+    });
+
+    test("the rule carries the responder, the project, the rule type and notifyAfterMinutes 0", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      const rule: UserNotificationRule = deliveredRules()[0]!;
+      expect(rule.userId!.toString()).toBe(USER_ID.toString());
+      expect(rule.projectId!.toString()).toBe(PROJECT_ID.toString());
+      expect(rule.ruleType).toBe(
+        NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+      );
+      // Immediate: the page is already late by the time the fallback runs.
+      expect(rule.notifyAfterMinutes).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("the rule type follows whatever the caller was paging for", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback({
+        ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT_EPISODE,
+      });
+
+      expect(deliveredRules()[0]!.ruleType).toBe(
+        NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT_EPISODE,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the rule has no id, so no timeline row can point at a rule that does not exist", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * buildLogTimelineItem sets userNotificationRuleId only `if
+       * (notificationRuleItem.id)`. An id here would be a dangling FK on every
+       * timeline row the fallback writes.
+       */
+      expect(deliveredRules()[0]!.id).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("no fallback rule is EVER persisted", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * The responder did not ask for these rules. Saving them would silently
+       * rewrite their notification configuration, and the next page would find
+       * "matching rules" that a human never created.
+       */
+      expect(ruleCreateSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (D) The claim.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("the fallback claims the on-call log under a reserved key", () => {
+    test("the claim key is the literal __fallback__", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      expect(claimSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      const claimArg: { userOnCallLogId: ObjectID; claimKey: string } = claimSpy
+        .mock.calls[0]![0] as {
+        userOnCallLogId: ObjectID;
+        claimKey: string;
+      };
+
+      /*
+       * There is no rule to claim under - that is the entire reason the
+       * fallback is running - so it claims a reserved literal instead.
+       * executedNotificationRules is a jsonb map keyed by arbitrary text, so
+       * the literal sits beside real rule uuids and can never collide with one.
+       */
+      expect(claimArg.claimKey).toBe("__fallback__");
+      expect(claimArg.userOnCallLogId.toString()).toBe(LOG_ID.toString());
+    });
+
+    test("the exported claim key constant is that same literal", () => {
+      // Pinned because the string is the interop contract with existing rows.
+      expect(FALLBACK_NOTIFICATION_CLAIM_KEY).toBe("__fallback__");
+    });
+
+    test("the claim strictly precedes any method lookup", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      await runFallback();
+
+      expect(claimSpy.mock.invocationCallOrder[0]).toBeLessThan(
+        emailFindSpy.mock.invocationCallOrder[0] as number,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("a lost claim delivers nothing and does not even look for a method", async () => {
+      claimSpy.mockResolvedValue(false as never);
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(deliverSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(pushFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(emailFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a lost claim is DeliveryFailed, never NoUsableNotificationMethod", async () => {
+      claimSpy.mockResolvedValue(false as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * The distinction is load-bearing. NoUsableNotificationMethod makes the
+       * caller write a TERMINAL Error onto the log - "this responder is
+       * unreachable" - which would be stamped over a page another run has in
+       * flight right now.
+       */
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed);
+      expect(result.outcome).not.toBe(
+        FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("of two concurrent fallbacks for one log, only the winner delivers", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      claimSpy
+        .mockResolvedValueOnce(true as never)
+        .mockResolvedValueOnce(false as never);
+
+      const results: Array<FallbackNotificationResult> = await Promise.all([
+        runFallback(),
+        runFallback(),
+      ]);
+
+      // One page, not two - the responder's phone buzzes once.
+      expect(deliverSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(results[0]!.notified).toBe(true);
+      expect(results[0]!.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Email"]);
+      expect(results[1]!.notified).toBe(false);
+      expect(results[1]!.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+      expect(results[1]!.outcome).toBe(
+        FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+   * (E) The three outcomes.
+   * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+   */
+
+  describe("the outcome the caller branches on", () => {
+    test("Delivered when at least one channel dispatched a page", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(true);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Email"]);
+    });
+
+    test("NoUsableNotificationMethod when the responder has nothing at all", async () => {
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * The one permanent ending: a retry finds the same nothing, and only a
+       * human adding a notification method changes it. It is the only outcome
+       * the caller is allowed to turn into a terminal Error.
+       */
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(
+        FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+      );
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+      expect(deliverSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("DeliveryFailed when the only chosen channel raised", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      deliverSpy.mockRejectedValue(new Error("smtp exploded") as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * There WAS something to try, so the responder is reachable and today
+       * simply was not reached. Reporting this as NoUsableNotificationMethod
+       * would tell the operator to go add a notification method that already
+       * exists.
+       */
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a raising channel does not take the fallback down with it", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      deliverSpy.mockRejectedValue(new Error("smtp exploded") as never);
+
+      await expect(runFallback()).resolves.toBeDefined();
+    });
+
+    test("DeliveryFailed when the chosen channel fell through its event-type guard", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      deliverSpy.mockResolvedValue(false as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * deliverNotificationForRule resolves perfectly happily when no channel
+       * block claimed the event type - it writes an Error timeline row and
+       * returns false. "Did not throw" is emphatically not "paged".
+       */
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("a channel that dispatched NOTHING is not listed in channelsUsed", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      // Push goes out; email falls through to the guard and sends nothing.
+      deliverSpy
+        .mockResolvedValueOnce(true as never)
+        .mockResolvedValueOnce(false as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      /*
+       * channelsUsed is read back to the operator verbatim as "notified via
+       * fallback (Push, Email)". A name in there that nobody was actually
+       * contacted on is a lie in the single place somebody looks to find out
+       * whether the responder was reached.
+       */
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Push"]);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).not.toContain("Email");
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("one channel raising does not stop the next channel from being tried", async () => {
+      pushFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedPush() as never);
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      deliverSpy
+        .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("APNs down") as never)
+        .mockResolvedValueOnce(true as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(deliverSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual(["Email"]);
+      expect(result.outcome).toBe(FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered);
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("notified always mirrors outcome === Delivered", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+
+      const delivered: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      deliverSpy.mockResolvedValue(false as never);
+      const failed: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+      const nothing: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      for (const result of [delivered, failed, nothing]) {
+        expect(result.notified).toBe(
+          result.outcome === FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered,
+        );
+      }
+    });
+
+    test("an undelivered outcome always carries an empty channel list", async () => {
+      emailFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(makeVerifiedEmail() as never);
+      deliverSpy.mockResolvedValue(false as never);
+
+      const result: FallbackNotificationResult = await runFallback();
+
+      expect(result.notified).toBe(false);
+      expect(result.channelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/*
+ * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *
+ * (F) The wiring: what UserOnCallLogService does with all of that.
+ * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ */
+
+describe("UserOnCallLogService.handleNoMatchingNotificationRule", () => {
+  let logUpdateSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let timelineUpdateSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let optOutFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let projectFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let fallbackSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let userFindSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let alertOwnersSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+  let loggerErrorSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
+
+  interface StatusUpdateCall {
+    id: ObjectID;
+    data: {
+      status?: UserNotificationExecutionStatus | undefined;
+      statusMessage?: string | undefined;
+    };
+    props: { isRoot: boolean };
+  }
+
+  interface TimelineUpdateCall {
+    id: ObjectID;
+    data: {
+      status?: OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus | undefined;
+      statusMessage?: string | undefined;
+    };
+    props: { isRoot: boolean };
+  }
+
+  interface UndeliverableAlertCall {
+    projectId: ObjectID;
+    userId: ObjectID;
+    ruleType: NotificationRuleType;
+    severityName: string;
+    onCallDutyPolicyId: ObjectID | undefined;
+    fallbackChannelsUsed: Array<string>;
+  }
+
+  function makeCreatedLog(): UserOnCallLog {
+    return {
+      id: LOG_ID,
+      _id: LOG_ID.toString(),
+      projectId: PROJECT_ID,
+      userId: USER_ID,
+      userNotificationEventType: UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated,
+      triggeredByIncidentId: INCIDENT_ID,
+      onCallDutyPolicyId: POLICY_ID,
+      onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: TIMELINE_ID,
+    } as unknown as UserOnCallLog;
+  }
+
+  function callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule(): Promise<void> {
+    return (
+      UserOnCallLogService as unknown as UserOnCallLogServiceInternals
+    ).handleNoMatchingNotificationRule({
+      createdItem: makeCreatedLog(),
+      notificationRuleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+      incidentSeverityId: INCIDENT_SEVERITY_ID,
+      alertSeverityId: undefined,
+      severityName: SEVERITY_NAME,
+    });
+  }
+
+  function statusUpdates(): Array<StatusUpdateCall> {
+    return logUpdateSpy.mock.calls.map(
+      (call: Array<unknown>): StatusUpdateCall => {
+        return call[0] as StatusUpdateCall;
+      },
+    );
+  }
+
+  function timelineUpdates(): Array<TimelineUpdateCall> {
+    return timelineUpdateSpy.mock.calls.map(
+      (call: Array<unknown>): TimelineUpdateCall => {
+        return call[0] as TimelineUpdateCall;
+      },
+    );
+  }
+
+  function lastStatusUpdate(): StatusUpdateCall {
+    const updates: Array<StatusUpdateCall> = statusUpdates();
+
+    return updates[updates.length - 1]!;
+  }
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    loggerErrorSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(logger, "error")
+      .mockImplementation((): void => {
+        return undefined;
+      });
+
+    logUpdateSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserOnCallLogService, "updateOneById")
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined as never);
+
+    timelineUpdateSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(OnCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineService, "updateOneById")
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined as never);
+
+    // No opt-out row: the interesting default is the one where a page is due.
+    optOutFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserNotificationRuleService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+
+    // Fallback enabled, which is the product default.
+    projectFindSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(ProjectService, "findOneById")
+      .mockResolvedValue(makeProject() as never);
+
+    fallbackSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(UserNotificationRuleService, "executeFallbackNotification")
+      .mockResolvedValue({
+        outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered,
+        notified: true,
+        channelsUsed: ["Push", "Email"],
+      } as never);
+
+    userFindSpy = jest.spyOn(UserService, "findOneById").mockResolvedValue({
+      name: new Name(RESPONDER_NAME),
+    } as never);
+
+    alertOwnersSpy = jest
+      .spyOn(OnCallNotificationAlertingService, "notifyOfUndeliverablePage")
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined as never);
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  describe("an opt-out row means deliberate silence", () => {
+    test("the log is Completed and the timeline says Skipped", async () => {
+      optOutFindSpy.mockResolvedValue({ _id: "opt-out-row" } as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * Completed, not Error: the system did exactly what it was told to do.
+       * Skipped rather than Notification Sent because nothing was in fact sent,
+       * and an operator scanning the escalation has to be able to tell "muted
+       * on purpose" from "delivered".
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Completed,
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain("opted out");
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.Skipped,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.id.toString()).toBe(TIMELINE_ID.toString());
+    });
+
+    test("the fallback is NEVER called, and the project is not even read", async () => {
+      optOutFindSpy.mockResolvedValue({ _id: "opt-out-row" } as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * The opt-out is checked FIRST, before the project setting and before any
+       * delivery. Paging somebody who asked not to be paged is the one failure
+       * mode the fallback could introduce, and this is what forecloses it.
+       */
+      expect(fallbackSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(projectFindSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("nobody is alerted - an opt-out is not a misconfiguration", async () => {
+      optOutFindSpy.mockResolvedValue({ _id: "opt-out-row" } as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(alertOwnersSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("the opt-out lookup asks for exactly the cell that came up empty", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      const query: Record<string, unknown> = (
+        optOutFindSpy.mock.calls[0]![0] as { query: Record<string, unknown> }
+      ).query;
+
+      expect((query["userId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(USER_ID.toString());
+      expect((query["projectId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect(query["ruleType"]).toBe(
+        NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+      );
+      expect((query["incidentSeverityId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        INCIDENT_SEVERITY_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect(query["isOptOut"]).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("disableOnCallNotificationFallback restores the old dead-end", () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      projectFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(
+        makeProject({ disableOnCallNotificationFallback: true }) as never,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the log and the timeline both carry the ORIGINAL sentence, verbatim", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * A project that sets this flag is asking for precisely the pre-fallback
+       * behaviour, so it must receive precisely the pre-fallback words -
+       * operators grep their execution logs for this sentence.
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error,
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toBe(
+        NO_NOTIFICATION_RULES_STATUS_MESSAGE,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.Error,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.statusMessage).toBe(
+        NO_NOTIFICATION_RULES_STATUS_MESSAGE,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the fallback is never called - the project is never billed for one", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(fallbackSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("the owner alert IS still fired, with an empty channel list", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * This one is a real bug that was written and then fixed: the early
+       * return sat ABOVE the alert, so the owner notification reached every
+       * project except the one that needs it most. A project that has switched
+       * the fallback off is the population still losing pages exactly the way
+       * they were lost before any of this existed.
+       */
+      expect(alertOwnersSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      const alerted: UndeliverableAlertCall = alertOwnersSpy.mock
+        .calls[0]![0] as UndeliverableAlertCall;
+      expect(alerted.projectId.toString()).toBe(PROJECT_ID.toString());
+      expect(alerted.userId.toString()).toBe(USER_ID.toString());
+      expect(alerted.ruleType).toBe(
+        NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+      );
+      expect(alerted.severityName).toBe(SEVERITY_NAME);
+      expect(alerted.onCallDutyPolicyId!.toString()).toBe(POLICY_ID.toString());
+      // Empty means "this responder was not reached at all".
+      expect(alerted.fallbackChannelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the fallback delivered", () => {
+    test("the log is left Executing, not Completed and not Error", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * Executing matches the normal path: there are no further rules to fire,
+       * so ExecutePendingExecutions finds an empty rule list on its next tick
+       * and closes the log out as Completed.
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Executing,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the message names the severity and the channels that carried the page", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      const message: string | undefined = lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage;
+      expect(message).toContain(
+        `No notification rule configured for ${SEVERITY_NAME}`,
+      );
+      expect(message).toContain("notified via fallback (Push, Email)");
+      // The old dead-end sentence is not written on this path at all.
+      expect(message).not.toBe(NO_NOTIFICATION_RULES_STATUS_MESSAGE);
+    });
+
+    test("the timeline says Notification Sent with the SAME message as the log", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(timelineUpdates()).toHaveLength(1);
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.NotificationSent,
+      );
+      // Two records of one event must not tell an operator two stories.
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.statusMessage).toBe(
+        lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the fallback is handed this log, this responder and this severity", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(fallbackSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      const options: Record<string, unknown> = fallbackSpy.mock
+        .calls[0]![0] as Record<string, unknown>;
+
+      expect((options["userId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        USER_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect((options["projectId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        PROJECT_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect((options["userOnCallLogId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        LOG_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect((options["userNotificationLogId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        LOG_ID.toString(),
+      );
+      expect(options["ruleType"]).toBe(
+        NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+      );
+      expect(options["severityName"]).toBe(SEVERITY_NAME);
+      expect(options["userNotificationEventType"]).toBe(
+        UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated,
+      );
+      expect((options["triggeredByIncidentId"] as ObjectID).toString()).toBe(
+        INCIDENT_ID.toString(),
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the humans are still told - a delivered fallback is still a misconfiguration", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(alertOwnersSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      const alerted: UndeliverableAlertCall = alertOwnersSpy.mock
+        .calls[0]![0] as UndeliverableAlertCall;
+      /*
+       * A non-empty list is the "your configuration is wrong but nobody was
+       * dropped" signal, and it is what tells the two branches apart at the
+       * single call site.
+       */
+      expect(alerted.fallbackChannelsUsed).toEqual(["Push", "Email"]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the fallback found nothing to page the responder on", () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      fallbackSpy.mockResolvedValue({
+        outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+        notified: false,
+        channelsUsed: [],
+      } as never);
+    });
+
+    test("the log ends terminally, naming the responder and what to do about it", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error,
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain(RESPONDER_NAME);
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain(
+        "has no verified notification method",
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain(
+        "User Settings > Notification Methods",
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.Error,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("a responder whose name cannot be read degrades to a neutral phrase", async () => {
+      userFindSpy.mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * The lookup only ever feeds a string, so a deleted user must not cost a
+       * status message - let alone throw out of the paging path.
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain("This responder");
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the owners hear about it with an empty channel list", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      const alerted: UndeliverableAlertCall = alertOwnersSpy.mock
+        .calls[0]![0] as UndeliverableAlertCall;
+      expect(alerted.fallbackChannelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the fallback tried and failed", () => {
+    test("a DeliveryFailed outcome does NOT claim the responder is unreachable", async () => {
+      fallbackSpy.mockResolvedValue({
+        outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed,
+        notified: false,
+        channelsUsed: [],
+      } as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * Sending the operator after a notification method that already exists
+       * wastes the one action the message is supposed to buy.
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).toContain(
+        "the fallback delivery attempt failed",
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage).not.toContain(
+        "has no verified notification method",
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("a fallback that THREW still ends the log at Error, never at Executing", async () => {
+      fallbackSpy.mockRejectedValue(new Error("smtp exploded") as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * REGRESSION GUARD, and the reason this test exists at all: leaving the
+       * log Executing here looks like the kind thing to do - "transient
+       * failure, let the worker retry" - and it is a worse bug than the one it
+       * avoids. Nothing re-enters this function; it runs once, from
+       * onCreateSuccess, at the moment the row is written. So the next
+       * ExecutePendingExecutions tick picks the log up, queries for due rules,
+       * finds none (there were never any - that is why we are here), takes its
+       * all-executed path and marks the log COMPLETED. onUpdateSuccess then
+       * translates Completed into Notification Sent on the escalation timeline,
+       * and within a minute the record reads "Alert Sent" for a page that was
+       * never delivered.
+       */
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error,
+      );
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).not.toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Executing,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.Error,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.statusMessage).toBe(
+        lastStatusUpdate().data.statusMessage,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("a fallback that threw is contained: the escalation is not taken down with it", async () => {
+      fallbackSpy.mockRejectedValue(new Error("smtp exploded") as never);
+
+      /*
+       * The caller is part-way through paging an entire escalation level. A
+       * throw out of here would abort every responder queued behind this one.
+       */
+      await expect(
+        callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule(),
+      ).resolves.toBeUndefined();
+      expect(loggerErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("a fallback that threw still tells the humans", async () => {
+      fallbackSpy.mockRejectedValue(new Error("smtp exploded") as never);
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(alertOwnersSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      const alerted: UndeliverableAlertCall = alertOwnersSpy.mock
+        .calls[0]![0] as UndeliverableAlertCall;
+      expect(alerted.fallbackChannelsUsed).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the owner alert is fire-and-forget", () => {
+    test("a REJECTING notifyOfUndeliverablePage does not reject the paging path", async () => {
+      alertOwnersSpy.mockRejectedValue(
+        new Error("owner lookup exploded") as never,
+      );
+
+      /*
+       * The alert is an explanation of a delivery problem. A bug in the
+       * explanation must never propagate into - or delay - the paging path that
+       * produced it.
+       */
+      await expect(
+        callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule(),
+      ).resolves.toBeUndefined();
+
+      await flushMicrotasks();
+
+      // Swallowed into the log rather than lost silently.
+      expect(loggerErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    test("a rejecting alert does not disturb the statuses that were already written", async () => {
+      alertOwnersSpy.mockRejectedValue(
+        new Error("owner lookup exploded") as never,
+      );
+
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+      await flushMicrotasks();
+
+      expect(lastStatusUpdate().data.status).toBe(
+        UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Executing,
+      );
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.status).toBe(
+        OnCallDutyExecutionLogTimelineStatus.NotificationSent,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("the alert is NOT awaited - the paging path returns while it is still pending", async () => {
+      let release: () => void = (): void => {
+        return undefined;
+      };
+      const pending: Promise<void> = new Promise<void>(
+        (resolve: () => void): void => {
+          release = resolve;
+        },
+      );
+      alertOwnersSpy.mockReturnValue(pending);
+
+      /*
+       * If the alert were awaited, this await would never settle and the test
+       * would time out. Reaching the next line IS the assertion.
+       */
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(alertOwnersSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+      release();
+      await pending;
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("the writes the no-rule path makes", () => {
+    test("the log is written before the on-call timeline", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * Order matters: updateOneById's own onUpdateSuccess hook maps the
+       * execution status onto the timeline, and the explicit second write is
+       * what lets this path say something the mapping cannot - Skipped for an
+       * opt-out, Notification Sent under an Executing log.
+       */
+      expect(logUpdateSpy.mock.invocationCallOrder[0]).toBeLessThan(
+        timelineUpdateSpy.mock.invocationCallOrder[0] as number,
+      );
+    });
+
+    test("exactly one log write and one timeline write, both as root", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      expect(statusUpdates()).toHaveLength(1);
+      expect(timelineUpdates()).toHaveLength(1);
+      expect(statusUpdates()[0]!.id.toString()).toBe(LOG_ID.toString());
+      expect(statusUpdates()[0]!.props.isRoot).toBe(true);
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.id.toString()).toBe(TIMELINE_ID.toString());
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.props.isRoot).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("the timeline never says the generic 'Alert Sent' on this path", async () => {
+      await callHandleNoMatchingNotificationRule();
+
+      /*
+       * The normal path writes "Alert Sent". A fallback delivery deliberately
+       * writes something an operator can act on instead, so it can never be
+       * mistaken for a configured one.
+       */
+      expect(timelineUpdates()[0]!.data.statusMessage).not.toBe("Alert Sent");
+    });
+  });
+});