@oneuptime/common 12.0.6 → 12.0.7

package/Tests/Server/Utils/Monitor/MonitorDependencySuppression.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,811 @@
+/*
+ * PasswordHash fails to COMPILE under ts-jest (TS 5.9 + @types/node Buffer
+ * mismatch) and DatabaseService (which every concrete service, including
+ * MonitorService, extends) imports it. Nothing password-related is under
+ * test here, so the module is replaced WITH A FACTORY — an automock would
+ * still require (and type-check) the real file.
+ */
+jest.mock("../../../../Server/Utils/PasswordHash", () => {
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: {
+      hash: jest.fn(),
+      verify: jest.fn(),
+      generateSalt: jest.fn(),
+      needsUpgrade: jest.fn(),
+      applyPepper: jest.fn(),
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+import MonitorDependencySuppression, {
+  DependencySuppressionResult,
+  ParentMonitorStatusRef,
+  SuppressingParent,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Monitor/MonitorDependencySuppression";
+import MonitorService from "../../../../Server/Services/MonitorService";
+import logger from "../../../../Server/Utils/Logger";
+import Monitor from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Monitor";
+import MonitorStatus from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/MonitorStatus";
+import ObjectID from "../../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import MonitorDependencyRule from "../../../../Utils/Monitor/MonitorDependencyRule";
+import { LIMIT_PER_PROJECT } from "../../../../Types/Database/LimitMax";
+import { afterEach, describe, expect, test } from "@jest/globals";
+
+/*
+ * Alert-dependency suppression: when a monitor declares dependsOnMonitors
+ * and a parent is currently in a suppressing status, alert/incident
+ * creation for the child is skipped for the evaluation. These tests pin
+ * the pure decision step (getSuppressingParents), the human-readable
+ * reason string shared by the alert and incident skip events, and the
+ * query orchestration (getDependencySuppression) — including its
+ * zero-query contract for monitors with no dependencies, which sits on
+ * the hottest Postgres path in the product.
+ */
+
+// The house workaround for @jest/globals vs @types/jest spy typing.
+type SpyLike = {
+  mock: { calls: Array<Array<unknown>> };
+  mockRestore: () => void;
+};
+
+const PARENT_A_ID: string = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
+const PARENT_B_ID: string = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
+const PARENT_C_ID: string = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
+const CHILD_ID: string = "dddddddd-dddd-4ddd-8ddd-dddddddddddd";
+const STATUS_OFFLINE_ID: string = "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa";
+const STATUS_DEGRADED_ID: string = "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb";
+const STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID: string = "cccccccc-cccc-4ccc-8ccc-cccccccccccc";
+
+type MakeParentRef = (overrides: {
+  monitorId?: string;
+  monitorName?: string;
+  statusId?: string | undefined;
+  statusName?: string | undefined;
+  isOfflineState?: boolean;
+}) => ParentMonitorStatusRef;
+
+const makeParentRef: MakeParentRef = (overrides: {
+  monitorId?: string;
+  monitorName?: string;
+  statusId?: string | undefined;
+  statusName?: string | undefined;
+  isOfflineState?: boolean;
+}): ParentMonitorStatusRef => {
+  return {
+    monitorId: overrides.monitorId || PARENT_A_ID,
+    monitorName: overrides.monitorName || "Router",
+    statusId: overrides.statusId,
+    statusName: overrides.statusName,
+    isOfflineState: overrides.isOfflineState || false,
+  };
+};
+
+type MakeStatus = (input: {
+  id: string;
+  name: string;
+  isOfflineState: boolean;
+}) => MonitorStatus;
+
+const makeStatus: MakeStatus = (input: {
+  id: string;
+  name: string;
+  isOfflineState: boolean;
+}): MonitorStatus => {
+  const status: MonitorStatus = new MonitorStatus();
+  status.id = new ObjectID(input.id);
+  status.name = input.name;
+  status.isOfflineState = input.isOfflineState;
+  return status;
+};
+
+type MakeParentRow = (input: {
+  id: string;
+  name?: string | undefined;
+  currentMonitorStatus?: MonitorStatus | undefined;
+  // The parent's OWN parent ids, as the mutual-cycle guard reads them.
+  dependsOnMonitorIds?: Array<string> | undefined;
+}) => Monitor;
+
+const makeParentRow: MakeParentRow = (input: {
+  id: string;
+  name?: string | undefined;
+  currentMonitorStatus?: MonitorStatus | undefined;
+  dependsOnMonitorIds?: Array<string> | undefined;
+}): Monitor => {
+  const parent: Monitor = new Monitor();
+  parent.id = new ObjectID(input.id);
+  if (input.name !== undefined) {
+    parent.name = input.name;
+  }
+  if (input.currentMonitorStatus !== undefined) {
+    parent.currentMonitorStatus = input.currentMonitorStatus;
+  }
+  if (input.dependsOnMonitorIds !== undefined) {
+    parent.dependsOnMonitors = input.dependsOnMonitorIds.map(
+      (grandParentId: string) => {
+        const stub: Monitor = new Monitor();
+        stub.id = new ObjectID(grandParentId);
+        return stub;
+      },
+    );
+  }
+  return parent;
+};
+
+// A bare id-only reference, the shape dependsOnMonitors rows arrive in.
+type MakeParentStub = (id: string) => Monitor;
+
+const makeParentStub: MakeParentStub = (id: string): Monitor => {
+  const stub: Monitor = new Monitor();
+  stub.id = new ObjectID(id);
+  return stub;
+};
+
+describe("MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents", () => {
+  describe("default rule (no configured statuses): offline parents suppress", () => {
+    test("a parent whose current status is flagged offline suppresses", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+              monitorName: "Router",
+              statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+              statusName: "Offline",
+              isOfflineState: true,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+          monitorName: "Router",
+          statusName: "Offline",
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    test("a parent in a non-offline status does not suppress", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              statusId: STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID,
+              statusName: "Operational",
+              isOfflineState: false,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a parent with NO current status never suppresses (a never-evaluated parent must not silence its children)", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              statusId: undefined,
+              statusName: undefined,
+              isOfflineState: false,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a suppressing parent with no status name falls back to 'Offline'", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+              statusName: undefined,
+              isOfflineState: true,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+        });
+
+      expect(result[0]?.statusName).toBe("Offline");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("configured-status rule takes full precedence over the offline flag", () => {
+    test("a parent in a configured status suppresses even when the status is not offline (degraded-state use case)", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+              monitorName: "Upstream API",
+              statusId: STATUS_DEGRADED_ID,
+              statusName: "Degraded",
+              isOfflineState: false,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>([STATUS_DEGRADED_ID]),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+          monitorName: "Upstream API",
+          statusName: "Degraded",
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    test("an OFFLINE parent whose status is NOT in the configured set does not suppress", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+              statusName: "Offline",
+              isOfflineState: true,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>([STATUS_DEGRADED_ID]),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a parent with no current status does not suppress under a configured list either", () => {
+      const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+        MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+          parents: [
+            makeParentRef({
+              statusId: undefined,
+              statusName: undefined,
+              isOfflineState: false,
+            }),
+          ],
+          configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>([STATUS_DEGRADED_ID]),
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  test("multiple parents: every matching parent is returned, in input order", () => {
+    const result: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+        parents: [
+          makeParentRef({
+            monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+            monitorName: "Router",
+            statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            statusName: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+          makeParentRef({
+            monitorId: PARENT_B_ID,
+            monitorName: "Load Balancer",
+            statusId: STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID,
+            statusName: "Operational",
+            isOfflineState: false,
+          }),
+          makeParentRef({
+            monitorId: PARENT_C_ID,
+            monitorName: "Database",
+            statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            statusName: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+        ],
+        configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+      });
+
+    expect(result).toEqual([
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Router",
+        statusName: "Offline",
+      },
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_C_ID,
+        monitorName: "Database",
+        statusName: "Offline",
+      },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("no parents yields no suppression", () => {
+    expect(
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+        parents: [],
+        configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("MonitorDependencySuppression.buildSuppressionReason", () => {
+  test("single parent: singular phrasing with quoted name and status", () => {
+    expect(
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.buildSuppressionReason([
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+          monitorName: "Router",
+          statusName: "Offline",
+        },
+      ]),
+    ).toBe('parent monitor "Router" is Offline');
+  });
+
+  test("multiple parents: plural phrasing, comma-joined, in order", () => {
+    expect(
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.buildSuppressionReason([
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+          monitorName: "Router",
+          statusName: "Offline",
+        },
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_B_ID,
+          monitorName: "Upstream API",
+          statusName: "Degraded",
+        },
+      ]),
+    ).toBe('parent monitors "Router" is Offline, "Upstream API" is Degraded');
+  });
+});
+
+describe("MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression", () => {
+  afterEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  function spyOnFindBy(rows: Array<Monitor>): SpyLike {
+    return jest
+      .spyOn(MonitorService, "findBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(rows as never) as unknown as SpyLike;
+  }
+
+  describe("zero-query contract for monitors without dependencies", () => {
+    test("dependsOnMonitors undefined: not suppressed and findBy is NEVER called", async () => {
+      const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("dependsOnMonitors empty array: not suppressed and findBy is NEVER called", async () => {
+      const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("dependency entries without any id are dropped and cause no query", async () => {
+      const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [new Monitor()];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(0);
+    });
+  });
+
+  test("monitor with parents: exactly one findBy, selecting the parents' current status", async () => {
+    const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_A_ID,
+        name: "Router",
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID,
+          name: "Operational",
+          isOfflineState: false,
+        }),
+      }),
+    ]);
+
+    const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+    monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID)];
+
+    const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+      await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({ monitor });
+
+    expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+    expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(1);
+
+    /*
+     * The query arg is asserted loosely (QueryHelper.any wraps the ids) but
+     * the select is the exact per-parent status shape the pure step needs.
+     */
+    const callArg: {
+      select: Record<string, unknown>;
+      limit: number;
+      skip: number;
+      props: { isRoot: boolean };
+    } = findBySpy.mock.calls[0]![0] as {
+      select: Record<string, unknown>;
+      limit: number;
+      skip: number;
+      props: { isRoot: boolean };
+    };
+
+    expect(callArg.select).toEqual({
+      _id: true,
+      name: true,
+      currentMonitorStatus: {
+        _id: true,
+        name: true,
+        isOfflineState: true,
+      },
+      /*
+       * The parents' own parent ids ride along for the runtime
+       * mutual-cycle guard, so the guard costs no extra query.
+       */
+      dependsOnMonitors: {
+        _id: true,
+      },
+    });
+    expect(callArg.limit).toBe(LIMIT_PER_PROJECT);
+    expect(callArg.skip).toBe(0);
+    expect(callArg.props).toEqual({ isRoot: true });
+  });
+
+  test("an offline parent suppresses; siblings in healthy or unknown status do not", async () => {
+    spyOnFindBy([
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_A_ID,
+        name: "Router",
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+          name: "Offline",
+          isOfflineState: true,
+        }),
+      }),
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_B_ID,
+        name: "Load Balancer",
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID,
+          name: "Operational",
+          isOfflineState: false,
+        }),
+      }),
+      // Never evaluated: no current status at all.
+      makeParentRow({ id: PARENT_C_ID, name: "Database" }),
+    ]);
+
+    const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+    monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [
+      makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID),
+      makeParentStub(PARENT_B_ID),
+      makeParentStub(PARENT_C_ID),
+    ];
+
+    const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+      await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({ monitor });
+
+    expect(result.isSuppressed).toBe(true);
+    expect(result.suppressingParents).toEqual([
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Router",
+        statusName: "Offline",
+      },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("configured suppression statuses are respected end-to-end: degraded (configured) suppresses, offline (unconfigured) does not", async () => {
+    spyOnFindBy([
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_A_ID,
+        name: "Upstream API",
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_DEGRADED_ID,
+          name: "Degraded",
+          isOfflineState: false,
+        }),
+      }),
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_B_ID,
+        name: "Router",
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+          name: "Offline",
+          isOfflineState: true,
+        }),
+      }),
+    ]);
+
+    const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+    monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [
+      makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID),
+      makeParentStub(PARENT_B_ID),
+    ];
+    monitor.suppressAlertsWhenParentMonitorStatuses = [
+      makeStatus({
+        id: STATUS_DEGRADED_ID,
+        name: "Degraded",
+        isOfflineState: false,
+      }),
+    ];
+
+    const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+      await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({ monitor });
+
+    expect(result.isSuppressed).toBe(true);
+    expect(result.suppressingParents).toEqual([
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Upstream API",
+        statusName: "Degraded",
+      },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("a nameless suppressing parent is reported as 'Unnamed monitor'", async () => {
+    spyOnFindBy([
+      makeParentRow({
+        id: PARENT_A_ID,
+        currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+          id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+          name: "Offline",
+          isOfflineState: true,
+        }),
+      }),
+    ]);
+
+    const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    monitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+    monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID)];
+
+    const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+      await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({ monitor });
+
+    expect(result.suppressingParents).toEqual([
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Unnamed monitor",
+        statusName: "Offline",
+      },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  describe("self-parent guard: a persisted self-edge must never suppress the monitor's own alerts", () => {
+    test("a monitor whose only dependency entry is ITSELF causes no query and no suppression", async () => {
+      const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = new ObjectID(CHILD_ID);
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(CHILD_ID)];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("an UPPERCASE self-edge is dropped too (uuids compare case-insensitively)", async () => {
+      const findBySpy: SpyLike = spyOnFindBy([]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = new ObjectID(CHILD_ID);
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(CHILD_ID.toUpperCase())];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(findBySpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(0);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("runtime mutual-cycle guard: a raced-in cycle fails open (pages) rather than silently suppressing", () => {
+    function spyOnLoggerWarn(): SpyLike {
+      return jest
+        .spyOn(logger, "warn")
+        .mockImplementation((): void => {}) as unknown as SpyLike;
+    }
+
+    test("an offline parent that itself depends on this monitor is ignored and a warning is logged", async () => {
+      const warnSpy: SpyLike = spyOnLoggerWarn();
+
+      spyOnFindBy([
+        makeParentRow({
+          id: PARENT_A_ID,
+          name: "Router",
+          currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+            id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            name: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+          // The parent points back at the monitor: a committed cycle.
+          dependsOnMonitorIds: [CHILD_ID],
+        }),
+      ]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = new ObjectID(CHILD_ID);
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID)];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(warnSpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(1);
+      expect(String(warnSpy.mock.calls[0]![0])).toContain("cycle");
+      expect(String(warnSpy.mock.calls[0]![0])).toContain(PARENT_A_ID);
+    });
+
+    test("the guard is case-insensitive: the parent's back-edge may carry an UPPERCASE id", async () => {
+      const warnSpy: SpyLike = spyOnLoggerWarn();
+
+      spyOnFindBy([
+        makeParentRow({
+          id: PARENT_A_ID,
+          name: "Router",
+          currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+            id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            name: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+          dependsOnMonitorIds: [CHILD_ID.toUpperCase()],
+        }),
+      ]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = new ObjectID(CHILD_ID);
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID)];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result).toEqual({ isSuppressed: false, suppressingParents: [] });
+      expect(warnSpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(1);
+    });
+
+    test("only the cycling parent is ignored: a second, non-cycling offline parent still suppresses", async () => {
+      const warnSpy: SpyLike = spyOnLoggerWarn();
+
+      spyOnFindBy([
+        // P: offline but in a mutual cycle with the monitor — ignored.
+        makeParentRow({
+          id: PARENT_A_ID,
+          name: "Router",
+          currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+            id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            name: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+          dependsOnMonitorIds: [CHILD_ID],
+        }),
+        // Q: offline with no back-edge — suppresses as usual.
+        makeParentRow({
+          id: PARENT_B_ID,
+          name: "Load Balancer",
+          currentMonitorStatus: makeStatus({
+            id: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+            name: "Offline",
+            isOfflineState: true,
+          }),
+          dependsOnMonitorIds: [],
+        }),
+      ]);
+
+      const monitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+      monitor.id = new ObjectID(CHILD_ID);
+      monitor.dependsOnMonitors = [
+        makeParentStub(PARENT_A_ID),
+        makeParentStub(PARENT_B_ID),
+      ];
+
+      const result: DependencySuppressionResult =
+        await MonitorDependencySuppression.getDependencySuppression({
+          monitor,
+        });
+
+      expect(result.isSuppressed).toBe(true);
+      expect(result.suppressingParents).toEqual([
+        {
+          monitorId: PARENT_B_ID,
+          monitorName: "Load Balancer",
+          statusName: "Offline",
+        },
+      ]);
+      expect(warnSpy.mock.calls.length).toBe(1);
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+/*
+ * The decision now lives in Common/Utils/Monitor/MonitorDependencyRule so
+ * the dashboard can import it without the server module graph; the server
+ * statics exercised above are thin delegates. One smoke check pins that
+ * the shared module itself exports the same behavior.
+ */
+describe("MonitorDependencyRule (shared pure module)", () => {
+  test("getSuppressingParents and buildSuppressionReason match the server-side delegates", () => {
+    const parents: Array<ParentMonitorStatusRef> = [
+      makeParentRef({
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Router",
+        statusId: STATUS_OFFLINE_ID,
+        statusName: "Offline",
+        isOfflineState: true,
+      }),
+      makeParentRef({
+        monitorId: PARENT_B_ID,
+        monitorName: "Load Balancer",
+        statusId: STATUS_OPERATIONAL_ID,
+        statusName: "Operational",
+        isOfflineState: false,
+      }),
+    ];
+
+    const fromRule: Array<SuppressingParent> =
+      MonitorDependencyRule.getSuppressingParents({
+        parents,
+        configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+      });
+
+    expect(fromRule).toEqual(
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.getSuppressingParents({
+        parents,
+        configuredSuppressionStatusIds: new Set<string>(),
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(fromRule).toEqual([
+      {
+        monitorId: PARENT_A_ID,
+        monitorName: "Router",
+        statusName: "Offline",
+      },
+    ]);
+
+    expect(MonitorDependencyRule.buildSuppressionReason(fromRule)).toBe(
+      MonitorDependencySuppression.buildSuppressionReason(fromRule),
+    );
+    expect(MonitorDependencyRule.buildSuppressionReason(fromRule)).toBe(
+      'parent monitor "Router" is Offline',
+    );
+  });
+});