@oneuptime/common 12.0.6 → 12.0.7

package/Server/Utils/Workspace/Slack/Slack.ts

@@ -33,12 +33,24 @@ import CaptureSpan from "../../Telemetry/CaptureSpan";
 import BadDataException from "../../../../Types/Exception/BadDataException";
 import ObjectID from "../../../../Types/ObjectID";
 import WorkspaceProjectAuthTokenService from "../../../Services/WorkspaceProjectAuthTokenService";
+import SSRFProtection from "../../SSRFProtection";
 
 export default class SlackUtil extends WorkspaceBase {
   public static isValidSlackIncomingWebhookUrl(
-    incomingWebhookUrl: URL,
+    incomingWebhookUrl: URL | string,
   ): boolean {
-    // check if the URL starts with https://hooks.slack.com/services/
+    /*
+     * Host AND path prefix. The host check is what stops SSRF; the "/services/"
+     * prefix is what makes this tighter than a bare domain pin. Both are read
+     * off the WHATWG parser via getBareHostname, so a "#"/"?" in the string
+     * cannot make an attacker host look like a Slack one.
+     */
+    if (
+      SSRFProtection.getBareHostname(incomingWebhookUrl) !== "hooks.slack.com"
+    ) {
+      return false;
+    }
+
     return incomingWebhookUrl
       .toString()
       .startsWith("https://hooks.slack.com/services/");
@@ -2265,6 +2277,17 @@ export default class SlackUtil extends WorkspaceBase {
     );
     logger.debug(data, {} as LogAttributes);
 
+    /*
+     * Enforced at the sink, not only at the callers: this URL reaches here from
+     * workflow arguments and from status page subscribers, and a caller that
+     * forgets the pin is an SSRF from the API server.
+     */
+    if (!SlackUtil.isValidSlackIncomingWebhookUrl(data.url)) {
+      throw new BadDataException(
+        "Slack Webhook URL must start with https://hooks.slack.com/services/",
+      );
+    }
+
     const apiResult: HTTPResponse<JSONObject> | HTTPErrorResponse | null =
       await API.post({
         url: data.url,

package/Server/Utils/Workspace/WorkspaceBase.ts

@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ export interface WorkspaceChannel {
   name: string;
   workspaceType: WorkspaceType;
   teamId?: string; // Required for Microsoft Teams
+  /*
+   * Microsoft Teams only: "standard" | "private" | "shared". Bots cannot post
+   * to shared channels at all, and a private channel needs the app installed
+   * into that channel specifically rather than into the parent team.
+   */
+  membershipType?: string | undefined;
 }
 
 export default class WorkspaceBase {

package/Tests/App/Dashboard/DangerZone.test.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+import "@testing-library/jest-dom";
+import {
+  act,
+  fireEvent,
+  render,
+  screen,
+  waitFor,
+} from "@testing-library/react";
+import React from "react";
+import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it } from "@jest/globals";
+import API from "../../../UI/Utils/API/API";
+import ProjectUtil from "../../../UI/Utils/Project";
+import PermissionUtil from "../../../UI/Utils/Permission";
+import HTTPErrorResponse from "../../../Types/API/HTTPErrorResponse";
+import HTTPResponse from "../../../Types/API/HTTPResponse";
+import Route from "../../../Types/API/Route";
+import Dictionary from "../../../Types/Dictionary";
+import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import { JSONObject } from "../../../Types/JSON";
+import { getJestSpyOn } from "../../Spy";
+
+/*
+ * Settings > Danger Zone is where a customer deletes their project - the one
+ * moment OneUptime can ask why they are leaving, because a second later the
+ * project and every trace of the account are gone for good.
+ *
+ * The page is rendered for real down to the confirmation dialog. Page chrome
+ * (the layout shell and the side menu) is stubbed: both want a router this
+ * test has no use for, and neither has anything to do with deleting a project.
+ */
+
+const PROJECT_ID: ObjectID = new ObjectID(
+  "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
+);
+
+interface MutableConfig {
+  billingEnabled: boolean;
+}
+
+const config: MutableConfig = { billingEnabled: true };
+
+(
+  globalThis as unknown as { __dangerZoneConfig: MutableConfig }
+).__dangerZoneConfig = config;
+
+/*
+ * BILLING_ENABLED is a module-scope const, so the two deployments have to be
+ * switchable per test rather than per file. defineProperty rather than a
+ * getter in the object literal: a literal getter is read once while the
+ * object is built, which would freeze the value at mock time.
+ */
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Config", () => {
+  const mocked: Record<string, unknown> = {
+    ...jest.requireActual("../../../UI/Config"),
+  };
+
+  Object.defineProperty(mocked, "BILLING_ENABLED", {
+    get: (): boolean => {
+      return Boolean(
+        (
+          globalThis as unknown as {
+            __dangerZoneConfig: MutableConfig | undefined;
+          }
+        ).__dangerZoneConfig?.billingEnabled,
+      );
+    },
+  });
+
+  return mocked;
+});
+
+jest.mock("../../../UI/Components/Page/Page", () => {
+  const react: typeof React = jest.requireActual("react");
+
+  return {
+    __esModule: true,
+    default: (props: { children?: React.ReactNode }) => {
+      return react.createElement("div", null, props.children);
+    },
+  };
+});
+
+jest.mock(
+  "../../../../App/FeatureSet/Dashboard/src/Pages/Settings/SideMenu",
+  () => {
+    return {
+      __esModule: true,
+      default: () => {
+        return null;
+      },
+    };
+  },
+);
+
+/*
+ * Imported after the mocks above so the page picks them up - the module reads
+ * BILLING_ENABLED as soon as it renders.
+ */
+import DangerZone from "../../../../App/FeatureSet/Dashboard/src/Pages/Settings/DangerZone";
+
+interface PageCalls {
+  projectDeleted: number;
+}
+
+type RenderPageFunction = () => PageCalls;
+
+const renderPage: RenderPageFunction = (): PageCalls => {
+  const calls: PageCalls = { projectDeleted: 0 };
+
+  render(
+    <DangerZone
+      pageRoute={new Route("/settings/danger-zone")}
+      currentProject={null}
+      hasPaymentMethod={true}
+      onProjectDeleted={() => {
+        calls.projectDeleted = calls.projectDeleted + 1;
+      }}
+    />,
+  );
+
+  return calls;
+};
+
+type OpenConfirmationFunction = () => void;
+
+const openConfirmation: OpenConfirmationFunction = (): void => {
+  fireEvent.click(
+    screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Delete Project" }) as HTMLElement,
+  );
+};
+
+type ConfirmFunction = () => Promise<void>;
+
+/*
+ * The confirm button kicks off the delete request, so the state updates it
+ * causes land outside this tick - hence act rather than a bare click.
+ */
+const confirm: ConfirmFunction = async (): Promise<void> => {
+  await act(async () => {
+    fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId("modal-footer-submit-button"));
+  });
+};
+
+type TypeReasonFunction = (reason: string) => void;
+
+const typeReason: TypeReasonFunction = (reason: string): void => {
+  fireEvent.change(screen.getByTestId("project-deletion-reason"), {
+    target: { value: reason },
+  });
+};
+
+describe("Settings > Danger Zone", () => {
+  let postCalls: Array<{
+    url: string;
+    data: JSONObject;
+    headers: Dictionary<string> | undefined;
+  }> = [];
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    jest.restoreAllMocks();
+
+    config.billingEnabled = true;
+    postCalls = [];
+
+    getJestSpyOn(ProjectUtil, "getCurrentProjectId").mockReturnValue(
+      PROJECT_ID,
+    );
+    getJestSpyOn(ProjectUtil, "clearCurrentProject").mockImplementation(
+      () => {},
+    );
+    getJestSpyOn(PermissionUtil, "clearProjectPermissions").mockImplementation(
+      () => {},
+    );
+
+    getJestSpyOn(API, "post").mockImplementation((data: any) => {
+      postCalls.push({
+        url: data.url.toString(),
+        data: data.data as JSONObject,
+        headers: data.headers as Dictionary<string> | undefined,
+      });
+
+      return Promise.resolve(new HTTPResponse<JSONObject>(200, {}, {}));
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * The server resolves which project's permissions this request carries from
+   * the tenantid header. API.post does not add it (ModelAPI does), so without
+   * it every delete from this page is refused - and the customer is told they
+   * are not allowed to delete their own project.
+   */
+  it("sends the project the request is authenticated for", async () => {
+    renderPage();
+    openConfirmation();
+    await confirm();
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(postCalls).toHaveLength(1);
+    });
+
+    expect(postCalls[0]?.headers?.["tenantid"]).toBe(PROJECT_ID.toString());
+  });
+
+  it("warns that the deletion cannot be undone", () => {
+    renderPage();
+
+    expect(screen.getByText(/no way to recover/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it("does not ask anything until the customer confirms they want to delete", () => {
+    renderPage();
+
+    expect(screen.queryByTestId("project-deletion-reason")).toBeNull();
+  });
+
+  it("asks why the customer is deleting the project", () => {
+    renderPage();
+    openConfirmation();
+
+    expect(
+      screen.getByText("Why are you deleting this project?"),
+    ).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(screen.getByTestId("project-deletion-reason")).toBeInTheDocument();
+  });
+
+  it("sends the reason with the delete", async () => {
+    renderPage();
+    openConfirmation();
+    typeReason("Too expensive for our team");
+    await confirm();
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(postCalls).toHaveLength(1);
+    });
+
+    expect(postCalls[0]?.url).toContain(
+      `/project/${PROJECT_ID.toString()}/delete-project`,
+    );
+    expect(postCalls[0]?.data).toEqual({
+      data: { deletionReason: "Too expensive for our team" },
+    });
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * Answering is optional. A customer who does not want to say why must still
+   * be able to delete their project.
+   */
+  it("still deletes the project when no reason is given", async () => {
+    const calls: PageCalls = renderPage();
+
+    openConfirmation();
+    await confirm();
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(postCalls).toHaveLength(1);
+    });
+
+    expect(postCalls[0]?.data).toEqual({ data: { deletionReason: "" } });
+    expect(calls.projectDeleted).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  it("clears the deleted project out of the session on success", async () => {
+    const calls: PageCalls = renderPage();
+
+    openConfirmation();
+    typeReason("Consolidating projects");
+    await confirm();
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(calls.projectDeleted).toBe(1);
+    });
+
+    expect(ProjectUtil.clearCurrentProject).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(PermissionUtil.clearProjectPermissions).toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * The success handler navigates away from the project. Running it after a
+   * failed delete would leave the customer looking at a project they still
+   * have and cannot get back to.
+   */
+  it("does not clear the session when the delete is refused", async () => {
+    getJestSpyOn(API, "post").mockResolvedValue(
+      new HTTPErrorResponse(400, { message: "Delete not allowed" }, {}),
+    );
+
+    const calls: PageCalls = renderPage();
+
+    openConfirmation();
+    await confirm();
+
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(screen.getByText("Delete Error")).toBeInTheDocument();
+    });
+
+    expect(calls.projectDeleted).toBe(0);
+    expect(ProjectUtil.clearCurrentProject).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * Self-hosted installs have nobody to follow up with and nowhere to record
+   * an answer, so the question is not asked at all there.
+   */
+  describe("on a self-hosted install", () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      config.billingEnabled = false;
+    });
+
+    it("does not ask why the project is being deleted", () => {
+      renderPage();
+      openConfirmation();
+
+      expect(screen.queryByTestId("project-deletion-reason")).toBeNull();
+      expect(
+        screen.queryByText("Why are you deleting this project?"),
+      ).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it("still deletes the project", async () => {
+      const calls: PageCalls = renderPage();
+
+      openConfirmation();
+      await confirm();
+
+      await waitFor(() => {
+        expect(calls.projectDeleted).toBe(1);
+      });
+
+      expect(postCalls[0]?.url).toContain(
+        `/project/${PROJECT_ID.toString()}/delete-project`,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+});