@ivannxbt/ai-config 0.1.0

package/.agents/skills/competitor-alternatives/references/content-architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+# Content Architecture for Competitor Pages
+
+How to structure and maintain competitor data for scalable comparison pages.
+
+## Contents
+- Centralized Competitor Data
+- Competitor Data Template
+- Your Product Data
+- Page Generation
+- Index Page Structure (alternatives index, vs comparisons index, index page best practices)
+- Footer Navigation
+
+## Centralized Competitor Data
+
+Create a single source of truth for each competitor:
+
+```
+competitor_data/
+├── notion.md
+├── airtable.md
+├── monday.md
+└── ...
+```
+
+---
+
+## Competitor Data Template
+
+Per competitor, document:
+
+```yaml
+name: Notion
+website: notion.so
+tagline: "The all-in-one workspace"
+founded: 2016
+headquarters: San Francisco
+
+# Positioning
+primary_use_case: "docs + light databases"
+target_audience: "teams wanting flexible workspace"
+market_position: "premium, feature-rich"
+
+# Pricing
+pricing_model: per-seat
+free_tier: true
+free_tier_limits: "limited blocks, 1 user"
+starter_price: $8/user/month
+business_price: $15/user/month
+enterprise: custom
+
+# Features (rate 1-5 or describe)
+features:
+  documents: 5
+  databases: 4
+  project_management: 3
+  collaboration: 4
+  integrations: 3
+  mobile_app: 3
+  offline_mode: 2
+  api: 4
+
+# Strengths (be honest)
+strengths:
+  - Extremely flexible and customizable
+  - Beautiful, modern interface
+  - Strong template ecosystem
+  - Active community
+
+# Weaknesses (be fair)
+weaknesses:
+  - Can be slow with large databases
+  - Learning curve for advanced features
+  - Limited automations compared to dedicated tools
+  - Offline mode is limited
+
+# Best for
+best_for:
+  - Teams wanting all-in-one workspace
+  - Content-heavy workflows
+  - Documentation-first teams
+  - Startups and small teams
+
+# Not ideal for
+not_ideal_for:
+  - Complex project management needs
+  - Large databases (1000s of rows)
+  - Teams needing robust offline
+  - Enterprise with strict compliance
+
+# Common complaints (from reviews)
+common_complaints:
+  - "Gets slow with lots of content"
+  - "Hard to find things as workspace grows"
+  - "Mobile app is clunky"
+
+# Migration notes
+migration_from:
+  difficulty: medium
+  data_export: "Markdown, CSV, HTML"
+  what_transfers: "Pages, databases"
+  what_doesnt: "Automations, integrations setup"
+  time_estimate: "1-3 days for small team"
+```
+
+---
+
+## Your Product Data
+
+Same structure for yourself—be honest:
+
+```yaml
+name: [Your Product]
+# ... same fields
+
+strengths:
+  - [Your real strengths]
+
+weaknesses:
+  - [Your honest weaknesses]
+
+best_for:
+  - [Your ideal customers]
+
+not_ideal_for:
+  - [Who should use something else]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Page Generation
+
+Each page pulls from centralized data:
+
+- **[Competitor] Alternative page**: Pulls competitor data + your data
+- **[Competitor] Alternatives page**: Pulls competitor data + your data + other alternatives
+- **You vs [Competitor] page**: Pulls your data + competitor data
+- **[A] vs [B] page**: Pulls both competitor data + your data
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Update competitor pricing once, updates everywhere
+- Add new feature comparison once, appears on all pages
+- Consistent accuracy across pages
+- Easier to maintain at scale
+
+---
+
+## Index Page Structure
+
+### Alternatives Index
+
+**URL**: `/alternatives` or `/alternatives/index`
+
+**Purpose**: Lists all "[Competitor] Alternative" pages
+
+**Page structure**:
+1. Headline: "[Your Product] as an Alternative"
+2. Brief intro on why people switch to you
+3. List of all alternative pages with:
+   - Competitor name/logo
+   - One-line summary of key differentiator vs. that competitor
+   - Link to full comparison
+4. Common reasons people switch (aggregated)
+5. CTA
+
+**Example**:
+```markdown
+## Explore [Your Product] as an Alternative
+
+Looking to switch? See how [Your Product] compares to the tools you're evaluating:
+
+- **[Notion Alternative](/alternatives/notion)** — Better for teams who need [X]
+- **[Airtable Alternative](/alternatives/airtable)** — Better for teams who need [Y]
+- **[Monday Alternative](/alternatives/monday)** — Better for teams who need [Z]
+```
+
+---
+
+### Vs Comparisons Index
+
+**URL**: `/vs` or `/compare`
+
+**Purpose**: Lists all "You vs [Competitor]" and "[A] vs [B]" pages
+
+**Page structure**:
+1. Headline: "Compare [Your Product]"
+2. Section: "[Your Product] vs Competitors" — list of direct comparisons
+3. Section: "Head-to-Head Comparisons" — list of [A] vs [B] pages
+4. Brief methodology note
+5. CTA
+
+---
+
+### Index Page Best Practices
+
+**Keep them updated**: When you add a new comparison page, add it to the relevant index.
+
+**Internal linking**:
+- Link from index → individual pages
+- Link from individual pages → back to index
+- Cross-link between related comparisons
+
+**SEO value**:
+- Index pages can rank for broad terms like "project management tool comparisons"
+- Pass link equity to individual comparison pages
+- Help search engines discover all comparison content
+
+**Sorting options**:
+- By popularity (search volume)
+- Alphabetically
+- By category/use case
+- By date added (show freshness)
+
+**Include on index pages**:
+- Last updated date for credibility
+- Number of pages/comparisons available
+- Quick filters if you have many comparisons
+
+---
+
+## Footer Navigation
+
+The site footer appears on all marketing pages, making it a powerful internal linking opportunity for competitor pages.
+
+### Option 1: Link to Index Pages (Minimum)
+
+At minimum, add links to your comparison index pages in the footer:
+
+```
+Footer
+├── Compare
+│   ├── Alternatives →  /alternatives
+│   └── Comparisons →  /vs
+```
+
+This ensures every marketing page passes link equity to your comparison content hub.
+
+### Option 2: Footer Columns by Format (Recommended for SEO)
+
+For stronger internal linking, create dedicated footer columns for each format you've built, linking directly to your top competitors:
+
+```
+Footer
+├── [Product] vs               ├── Alternatives to            ├── Compare
+│   ├── vs Notion              │   ├── Notion Alternative     │   ├── Notion vs Airtable
+│   ├── vs Airtable            │   ├── Airtable Alternative   │   ├── Monday vs Asana
+│   ├── vs Monday              │   ├── Monday Alternative     │   ├── Notion vs Monday
+│   ├── vs Asana               │   ├── Asana Alternative      │   ├── ...
+│   ├── vs Clickup             │   ├── Clickup Alternative    │   └── View all →
+│   ├── ...                    │   ├── ...                    │
+│   └── View all →             │   └── View all →             │
+```
+
+**Guidelines**:
+- Include up to 8 links per column (top competitors by search volume)
+- Add "View all" link to the full index page
+- Only create columns for formats you've actually built pages for
+- Prioritize competitors with highest search volume
+
+### Why Footer Links Matter
+
+1. **Sitewide distribution**: Footer links appear on every marketing page, passing link equity from your entire site to comparison content
+2. **Crawl efficiency**: Search engines discover all comparison pages quickly
+3. **User discovery**: Visitors evaluating your product can easily find comparisons
+4. **Competitive positioning**: Signals to search engines that you're a key player in the space
+
+### Implementation Notes
+
+- Update footer when adding new high-priority comparison pages
+- Keep footer clean—don't list every comparison, just the top ones
+- Match column headers to your URL structure (e.g., "vs" column → `/vs/` URLs)
+- Consider mobile: columns may stack, so order by priority

package/.agents/skills/competitor-alternatives/references/templates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+# Section Templates for Competitor Pages
+
+Ready-to-use templates for each section of competitor comparison pages.
+
+## Contents
+- TL;DR Summary
+- Paragraph Comparison (Not Just Tables)
+- Feature Comparison Section
+- Pricing Comparison Section
+- Service & Support Comparison
+- Who It's For Section
+- Migration Section
+- Social Proof Section
+- Comparison Table Best Practices (beyond checkmarks, organize by category, include ratings where useful)
+
+## TL;DR Summary
+
+Start every page with a quick summary for scanners:
+
+```markdown
+**TL;DR**: [Competitor] excels at [strength] but struggles with [weakness].
+[Your product] is built for [your focus], offering [key differentiator].
+Choose [Competitor] if [their ideal use case]. Choose [You] if [your ideal use case].
+```
+
+---
+
+## Paragraph Comparison (Not Just Tables)
+
+For each major dimension, write a paragraph:
+
+```markdown
+## Features
+
+[Competitor] offers [description of their feature approach].
+Their strength is [specific strength], which works well for [use case].
+However, [limitation] can be challenging for [user type].
+
+[Your product] takes a different approach with [your approach].
+This means [benefit], though [honest tradeoff].
+Teams who [specific need] often find this more effective.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Feature Comparison Section
+
+Go beyond checkmarks:
+
+```markdown
+## Feature Comparison
+
+### [Feature Category]
+
+**[Competitor]**: [2-3 sentence description of how they handle this]
+- Strengths: [specific]
+- Limitations: [specific]
+
+**[Your product]**: [2-3 sentence description]
+- Strengths: [specific]
+- Limitations: [specific]
+
+**Bottom line**: Choose [Competitor] if [scenario]. Choose [You] if [scenario].
+```
+
+---
+
+## Pricing Comparison Section
+
+```markdown
+## Pricing
+
+| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
+|---|---|---|
+| Free tier | [Details] | [Details] |
+| Starting price | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
+| Business tier | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
+| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
+
+**What's included**: [Competitor]'s $X plan includes [features], while
+[Your product]'s $X plan includes [features].
+
+**Total cost consideration**: Beyond per-seat pricing, consider [hidden costs,
+add-ons, implementation]. [Competitor] charges extra for [X], while
+[Your product] includes [Y] in base pricing.
+
+**Value comparison**: For a 10-person team, [Competitor] costs approximately
+$X/year while [Your product] costs $Y/year, with [key differences in what you get].
+```
+
+---
+
+## Service & Support Comparison
+
+```markdown
+## Service & Support
+
+| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
+|---|---|---|
+| Documentation | [Quality assessment] | [Quality assessment] |
+| Response time | [SLA if known] | [Your SLA] |
+| Support channels | [List] | [List] |
+| Onboarding | [What they offer] | [What you offer] |
+| CSM included | [At what tier] | [At what tier] |
+
+**Support quality**: Based on [G2/Capterra reviews, your research],
+[Competitor] support is described as [assessment]. Common feedback includes
+[quotes or themes].
+
+[Your product] offers [your support approach]. [Specific differentiator like
+response time, dedicated CSM, implementation help].
+```
+
+---
+
+## Who It's For Section
+
+```markdown
+## Who Should Choose [Competitor]
+
+[Competitor] is the right choice if:
+- [Specific use case or need]
+- [Team type or size]
+- [Workflow or requirement]
+- [Budget or priority]
+
+**Ideal [Competitor] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
+
+## Who Should Choose [Your Product]
+
+[Your product] is built for teams who:
+- [Specific use case or need]
+- [Team type or size]
+- [Workflow or requirement]
+- [Priority or value]
+
+**Ideal [Your product] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Migration Section
+
+```markdown
+## Switching from [Competitor]
+
+### What transfers
+- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
+- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
+
+### What needs reconfiguration
+- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
+- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
+
+### Migration support
+
+We offer [migration support details]:
+- [Free data import tool / white-glove migration]
+- [Documentation / migration guide]
+- [Timeline expectation]
+- [Support during transition]
+
+### What customers say about switching
+
+> "[Quote from customer who switched]"
+> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Social Proof Section
+
+Focus on switchers:
+
+```markdown
+## What Customers Say
+
+### Switched from [Competitor]
+
+> "[Specific quote about why they switched and outcome]"
+> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
+
+> "[Another quote]"
+> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
+
+### Results after switching
+- [Company] saw [specific result]
+- [Company] reduced [metric] by [amount]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Comparison Table Best Practices
+
+### Beyond Checkmarks
+
+Instead of:
+| Feature | You | Competitor |
+|---------|-----|-----------|
+| Feature A | ✓ | ✓ |
+| Feature B | ✓ | ✗ |
+
+Do this:
+| Feature | You | Competitor |
+|---------|-----|-----------|
+| Feature A | Full support with [detail] | Basic support, [limitation] |
+| Feature B | [Specific capability] | Not available |
+
+### Organize by Category
+
+Group features into meaningful categories:
+- Core functionality
+- Collaboration
+- Integrations
+- Security & compliance
+- Support & service
+
+### Include Ratings Where Useful
+
+| Category | You | Competitor | Notes |
+|----------|-----|-----------|-------|
+| Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |
+| Feature depth | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |