@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.2.0

package/templates/core/03_generate_tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+# 🔄 Task Generation & Breakdown Framework
+
+**Metadata**
+- Last Updated: {{DATE}}
+- Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
+- Related Docs: Uses 01_prd.md → feeds 04_process_task_list.md
+
+> **🎯 Purpose**
+> Systematic breakdown of PRD features into actionable, estimable tasks with clear dependencies and acceptance criteria. This template ensures comprehensive coverage and realistic estimation for successful project delivery.
+
+---
+
+## 📊 1. Input Analysis & Preparation
+
+### 1.1 PRD Feature Extraction
+**Source Document:** _{Link to PRD (01_prd.md)}_
+
+**Features to Decompose:**
+| Feature ID | Feature Name | Priority | Business Value | Complexity |
+|------------|--------------|----------|----------------|------------|
+| F001 | _{Feature name}_ | P0 | High | Medium |
+| F002 | _{Feature name}_ | P1 | Medium | High |
+| F003 | _{Feature name}_ | P2 | Low | Low |
+
+### 1.2 Prerequisites & Dependencies
+**External Dependencies:**
+- [ ] _{Design system components ready}_
+- [ ] _{API specifications finalized}_
+- [ ] _{Infrastructure provisioned}_
+- [ ] _{Third-party integrations available}_
+
+**Technical Prerequisites:**
+- [ ] _{Development environment setup}_
+- [ ] _{Code repository configured}_
+- [ ] _{CI/CD pipeline established}_
+- [ ] _{Testing frameworks installed}_
+
+### 1.3 Team Capacity Assessment
+| Role | Available Hours/Sprint | Skill Level | Specialty Areas |
+|------|----------------------|-------------|----------------|
+| **Frontend Developer** | _{40 hours}_ | Senior | React, TypeScript |
+| **Backend Developer** | _{40 hours}_ | Mid-level | Node.js, PostgreSQL |
+| **DevOps Engineer** | _{20 hours}_ | Senior | AWS, Docker |
+| **QA Engineer** | _{30 hours}_ | Mid-level | Automation, API testing |
+
+---
+
+## 🏗️ 2. User Story Generation
+
+### 2.1 Story Template & Standards
+**Standard Format:**
+```
+As a [user type]
+I want [capability/feature]
+So that [outcome/benefit]
+```
+
+**Story Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] **Independent:** Can be developed separately
+- [ ] **Negotiable:** Details can be discussed
+- [ ] **Valuable:** Provides user/business value
+- [ ] **Estimable:** Size can be determined
+- [ ] **Small:** Fits in one sprint
+- [ ] **Testable:** Acceptance criteria are clear
+
+### 2.2 Epic Breakdown Process
+
+#### Epic: _{Feature Name}_ (F001)
+**Business Objective:** _{What business goal this achieves}_
+**User Impact:** _{How this improves user experience}_
+
+##### User Story US001: _{Story Title}_
+**Story:** As a _{user type}_, I want _{capability}_ so that _{outcome}_
+
+**Business Value:** _{High/Medium/Low + justification}_
+**Story Points:** _{Fibonacci estimate: 1,2,3,5,8,13}_
+**Sprint Assignment:** _{Sprint X}_
+
+**Acceptance Criteria:**
+- [ ] **AC001:** Given _{context}_, when _{action}_, then _{expected result}_
+- [ ] **AC002:** Given _{context}_, when _{action}_, then _{expected result}_
+- [ ] **AC003:** System handles _{error condition}_ gracefully
+- [ ] **AC004:** Performance meets _{specific requirement}_
+
+**Definition of Done:**
+- [ ] Code reviewed and approved
+- [ ] Unit tests written (≥80% coverage)
+- [ ] Integration tests passing
+- [ ] Security review completed
+- [ ] Documentation updated
+- [ ] Accessibility requirements met
+- [ ] Performance benchmarks achieved
+
+##### User Story US002: _{Story Title}_
+[Repeat format above]
+
+### 2.3 Cross-Cutting Stories
+**Infrastructure Stories:**
+- US-INF-001: Set up monitoring and alerting
+- US-INF-002: Implement security scanning
+- US-INF-003: Configure backup and recovery
+
+**Technical Debt Stories:**
+- US-TECH-001: Refactor legacy authentication
+- US-TECH-002: Upgrade outdated dependencies
+- US-TECH-003: Improve error handling consistency
+
+---
+
+## ⚙️ 3. Task Decomposition Framework
+
+### 3.1 Task Breakdown Structure (WBS)
+
+#### Epic F001: _{Feature Name}_
+
+##### User Story US001: _{Story Title}_
+
+**Frontend Tasks:**
+| Task ID | Description | Estimate | Dependencies | Owner | Sprint |
+|---------|-------------|----------|--------------|-------|--------|
+| T001-FE-01 | Create component wireframes | 4h | Design approval | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-FE-02 | Implement React component | 8h | T001-FE-01 | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-FE-03 | Add responsive design | 6h | T001-FE-02 | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-FE-04 | Implement state management | 6h | T001-FE-02 | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-FE-05 | Add error handling | 4h | T001-FE-04 | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-FE-06 | Write component tests | 6h | T001-FE-02 | Frontend Dev | S1 |
+
+**Backend Tasks:**
+| Task ID | Description | Estimate | Dependencies | Owner | Sprint |
+|---------|-------------|----------|--------------|-------|--------|
+| T001-BE-01 | Design API endpoints | 4h | PRD approval | Backend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-BE-02 | Implement data models | 8h | T001-BE-01 | Backend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-BE-03 | Create API controllers | 12h | T001-BE-02 | Backend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-BE-04 | Add input validation | 6h | T001-BE-03 | Backend Dev | S1 |
+| T001-BE-05 | Implement business logic | 16h | T001-BE-03 | Backend Dev | S2 |
+| T001-BE-06 | Add error handling | 4h | T001-BE-05 | Backend Dev | S2 |
+| T001-BE-07 | Write API tests | 8h | T001-BE-05 | Backend Dev | S2 |
+
+**DevOps Tasks:**
+| Task ID | Description | Estimate | Dependencies | Owner | Sprint |
+|---------|-------------|----------|--------------|-------|--------|
+| T001-DO-01 | Configure staging environment | 8h | Infrastructure | DevOps | S1 |
+| T001-DO-02 | Set up CI/CD pipeline | 12h | T001-DO-01 | DevOps | S1 |
+| T001-DO-03 | Configure monitoring | 6h | T001-DO-01 | DevOps | S2 |
+| T001-DO-04 | Set up automated backups | 4h | T001-DO-01 | DevOps | S2 |
+
+**QA Tasks:**
+| Task ID | Description | Estimate | Dependencies | Owner | Sprint |
+|---------|-------------|----------|--------------|-------|--------|
+| T001-QA-01 | Write test scenarios | 6h | US001 definition | QA Engineer | S1 |
+| T001-QA-02 | Create automated tests | 12h | T001-FE-02, T001-BE-03 | QA Engineer | S2 |
+| T001-QA-03 | Perform integration testing | 8h | All development tasks | QA Engineer | S2 |
+| T001-QA-04 | Load testing | 6h | T001-QA-03 | QA Engineer | S2 |
+| T001-QA-05 | Security testing | 4h | T001-QA-03 | QA Engineer | S2 |
+
+### 3.2 Estimation Methodology
+
+#### 3.2.1 Planning Poker Process
+**Estimation Scale:** Modified Fibonacci (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21)
+
+**Estimation Guidelines:**
+- **1 point:** Simple configuration change (1-2 hours)
+- **2 points:** Minor feature addition (2-4 hours)
+- **3 points:** Standard feature implementation (4-8 hours)
+- **5 points:** Complex feature or integration (1-2 days)
+- **8 points:** Major feature with dependencies (2-3 days)
+- **13 points:** Epic-level work requiring breakdown
+- **21 points:** Requires further analysis and breakdown
+
+#### 3.2.2 Estimation Factors
+**Technical Complexity:**
+- Algorithm complexity
+- Integration points
+- Performance requirements
+- Security considerations
+
+**Risk Factors:**
+- Team familiarity with technology
+- External dependencies
+- Changing requirements
+- Technical debt impact
+
+**Buffer Calculation:**
+- Low risk tasks: +10% buffer
+- Medium risk tasks: +25% buffer
+- High risk tasks: +50% buffer
+
+### 3.3 Dependency Management
+
+#### 3.3.1 Dependency Types
+**Technical Dependencies:**
+- Code dependencies (A needs B to be completed)
+- Resource dependencies (shared infrastructure)
+- Skill dependencies (specialist knowledge required)
+
+**Business Dependencies:**
+- Stakeholder approvals
+- External vendor deliverables
+- Regulatory compliance
+
+#### 3.3.2 Dependency Tracking Matrix
+| Task ID | Depends On | Dependency Type | Risk Level | Mitigation |
+|---------|------------|-----------------|------------|------------|
+| T001-FE-02 | T001-FE-01 | Technical | Low | Overlap design and development |
+| T001-BE-05 | External API | External | High | Mock implementation for development |
+| T001-QA-02 | T001-FE-02, T001-BE-03 | Technical | Medium | Parallel test development |
+
+#### 3.3.3 Critical Path Analysis
+**Critical Path:** _{T001-BE-01 → T001-BE-02 → T001-BE-03 → T001-BE-05 → T001-QA-03}_
+**Total Duration:** _{44 hours (5.5 days)}_
+**Buffer Recommendations:** _{Add 2-day buffer for integration issues}_
+
+---
+
+## 📋 4. Quality Gates & Validation
+
+### 4.1 Story Validation Checklist
+**For Each User Story:**
+- [ ] **Clear Value:** Business value is articulated
+- [ ] **User-Centric:** Written from user perspective
+- [ ] **Testable:** Acceptance criteria are verifiable
+- [ ] **Estimable:** Team can size the story
+- [ ] **Independent:** Can be developed separately
+- [ ] **Right-Sized:** Fits within one sprint
+
+### 4.2 Task Validation Checklist
+**For Each Task:**
+- [ ] **Atomic:** Cannot be meaningfully subdivided
+- [ ] **Assignable:** Clear owner identified
+- [ ] **Estimable:** Time estimate provided
+- [ ] **Trackable:** Progress can be measured
+- [ ] **Testable:** Completion criteria defined
+- [ ] **Sized Appropriately:** ≤ 2 days of work
+
+### 4.3 Completeness Validation
+**Coverage Verification:**
+- [ ] All PRD features have corresponding user stories
+- [ ] All user stories have complete task breakdown
+- [ ] Cross-cutting concerns (security, performance) addressed
+- [ ] Non-functional requirements included
+- [ ] Technical debt and refactoring tasks identified
+
+### 4.4 Risk Assessment
+**High-Risk Tasks Identified:**
+- Tasks with external dependencies
+- Tasks requiring new technology learning
+- Tasks with unclear requirements
+- Tasks on critical path
+
+**Risk Mitigation Strategies:**
+- Spike tasks for research
+- Proof of concept development
+- Early stakeholder validation
+- Parallel development tracks
+
+---
+
+## 📊 5. Estimation Summary & Metrics
+
+### 5.1 Sprint Planning Summary
+| Sprint | Total Story Points | Total Hours | Team Capacity | Utilization |
+|--------|-------------------|-------------|---------------|-------------|
+| Sprint 1 | 21 | 84h | 90h | 93% |
+| Sprint 2 | 34 | 136h | 90h | 151% (Over-allocated) |
+| Sprint 3 | 18 | 72h | 90h | 80% |
+
+### 5.2 Resource Allocation
+| Role | Sprint 1 | Sprint 2 | Sprint 3 | Total Hours |
+|------|----------|----------|----------|-------------|
+| **Frontend** | 34h | 28h | 20h | 82h |
+| **Backend** | 40h | 48h | 32h | 120h |
+| **DevOps** | 20h | 22h | 8h | 50h |
+| **QA** | 12h | 38h | 20h | 70h |
+
+### 5.3 Velocity Tracking
+**Historical Velocity:** _{Last 3 sprints average}_
+**Planned Velocity:** _{Based on current breakdown}_
+**Confidence Level:** _{High/Medium/Low with reasoning}_
+
+### 5.4 Risk Indicators
+**Red Flags:**
+- Sprint over-allocation (>100% capacity)
+- Critical path dependencies
+- Unclear requirements (stories marked as spikes)
+- Resource bottlenecks
+
+**Mitigation Recommendations:**
+- Redistribute work across sprints
+- Add buffer time for high-risk tasks
+- Schedule dependency resolution early
+- Consider parallel development streams
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 6. Implementation Roadmap
+
+### 6.1 Sprint Goals
+**Sprint 1: Foundation**
+- **Goal:** Establish core infrastructure and basic functionality
+- **Deliverables:** API framework, basic UI components, CI/CD pipeline
+- **Success Criteria:** Development environment fully operational
+
+**Sprint 2: Core Features**
+- **Goal:** Implement primary user workflows
+- **Deliverables:** Complete user stories US001-US003
+- **Success Criteria:** End-to-end user journey functional
+
+**Sprint 3: Polish & Integration**
+- **Goal:** Finalize features and prepare for release
+- **Deliverables:** Performance optimization, testing complete
+- **Success Criteria:** Ready for production deployment
+
+### 6.2 Milestone Tracking
+| Milestone | Target Date | Dependencies | Success Criteria |
+|-----------|-------------|--------------|------------------|
+| **Dev Environment Ready** | Week 1 | Infrastructure setup | All developers can commit code |
+| **API MVP Complete** | Week 4 | Core backend tasks | Frontend can integrate |
+| **Feature Complete** | Week 8 | All user stories | Acceptance criteria met |
+| **Production Ready** | Week 10 | Testing complete | Launch criteria satisfied |
+
+### 6.3 Delivery Pipeline
+```mermaid
+gantt
+    title Feature Development Timeline
+    dateFormat  YYYY-MM-DD
+    section Sprint 1
+    Infrastructure Setup    :active, s1-infra, 2024-01-01, 5d
+    API Framework          :s1-api, after s1-infra, 8d
+    Basic UI Components     :s1-ui, 2024-01-03, 10d
+    section Sprint 2
+    Core Features          :s2-core, after s1-api, 10d
+    Integration Testing    :s2-test, after s2-core, 5d
+    section Sprint 3
+    Performance Tuning     :s3-perf, after s2-test, 5d
+    Production Prep        :s3-prod, after s3-perf, 5d
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📝 7. Documentation & Handoff
+
+### 7.1 Task Documentation Standards
+**Required for Each Task:**
+- Clear description and acceptance criteria
+- Technical specifications or wireframes
+- Dependencies and blockers identified
+- Testing requirements defined
+- Documentation requirements specified
+
+### 7.2 Knowledge Transfer Plan
+**Documentation Deliverables:**
+- [ ] API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+- [ ] Component library documentation
+- [ ] Deployment runbooks
+- [ ] Testing procedures
+- [ ] Troubleshooting guides
+
+### 7.3 Team Handoff Checklist
+**Before Sprint Start:**
+- [ ] All tasks have clear acceptance criteria
+- [ ] Dependencies resolved or mitigated
+- [ ] Required resources available
+- [ ] Team capacity confirmed
+- [ ] Risk mitigation plans in place
+
+**During Sprint:**
+- [ ] Daily standup updates
+- [ ] Blocker escalation process
+- [ ] Code review requirements
+- [ ] Testing milestone checks
+
+**Sprint Completion:**
+- [ ] All acceptance criteria validated
+- [ ] Documentation updated
+- [ ] Knowledge transfer completed
+- [ ] Retrospective feedback captured
+
+---
+
+## 📊 8. Success Metrics & KPIs
+
+### 8.1 Delivery Metrics
+| Metric | Target | Tracking Method |
+|--------|--------|-----------------|
+| **Sprint Goal Achievement** | 100% | Story completion rate |
+| **Velocity Consistency** | ±10% of planned | Story points delivered |
+| **Estimation Accuracy** | ±20% of actual | Hours tracked vs estimated |
+| **Defect Rate** | <5% of stories | Bug reports per story |
+
+### 8.2 Quality Metrics
+| Metric | Target | Tracking Method |
+|--------|--------|-----------------|
+| **Code Coverage** | ≥80% | Automated testing tools |
+| **Code Review Coverage** | 100% | PR review process |
+| **Security Scan Pass Rate** | 100% | Automated security scans |
+| **Performance Benchmarks** | Meet SLA requirements | Performance testing |
+
+### 8.3 Team Metrics
+| Metric | Target | Tracking Method |
+|--------|--------|-----------------|
+| **Team Velocity** | Consistent trend | Sprint retrospectives |
+| **Blocker Resolution Time** | <24 hours | Issue tracking |
+| **Knowledge Sharing** | Weekly sessions | Team calendar |
+| **Technical Debt Ratio** | <20% of velocity | Backlog analysis |
+
+---
+
+**📋 Task Generation Checklist:**
+- [ ] All PRD features decomposed into user stories
+- [ ] All user stories broken into actionable tasks
+- [ ] Dependencies identified and mapped
+- [ ] Estimates provided using team standards
+- [ ] Resource allocation verified
+- [ ] Risk assessment completed
+- [ ] Quality gates defined
+- [ ] Sprint planning ready
+
+**Next Steps:** Proceed to 04_process_task_list.md for execution planning.