@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.2.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (57) hide show
  1. package/dist/cli.js +117 -75
  2. package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -1
  3. package/dist/core/index.d.ts +62 -0
  4. package/dist/core/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
  5. package/dist/core/index.js +137 -0
  6. package/dist/core/index.js.map +1 -0
  7. package/dist/index.d.ts +10 -0
  8. package/dist/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
  9. package/dist/index.js +13 -0
  10. package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
  11. package/dist/interview/analyzer.d.ts +39 -0
  12. package/dist/interview/analyzer.d.ts.map +1 -0
  13. package/dist/interview/analyzer.js +353 -0
  14. package/dist/interview/analyzer.js.map +1 -0
  15. package/dist/interview/engine.d.ts +71 -0
  16. package/dist/interview/engine.d.ts.map +1 -0
  17. package/dist/interview/engine.js +194 -0
  18. package/dist/interview/engine.js.map +1 -0
  19. package/dist/interview/index.d.ts +9 -0
  20. package/dist/interview/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
  21. package/dist/interview/index.js +8 -0
  22. package/dist/interview/index.js.map +1 -0
  23. package/dist/interview/questions.d.ts +22 -0
  24. package/dist/interview/questions.d.ts.map +1 -0
  25. package/dist/interview/questions.js +353 -0
  26. package/dist/interview/questions.js.map +1 -0
  27. package/dist/interview/types.d.ts +84 -0
  28. package/dist/interview/types.d.ts.map +1 -0
  29. package/dist/interview/types.js +5 -0
  30. package/dist/interview/types.js.map +1 -0
  31. package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts +7 -0
  32. package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
  33. package/dist/mcp/index.js +241 -0
  34. package/dist/mcp/index.js.map +1 -0
  35. package/package.json +30 -10
  36. package/templates/core/01_prd.md +465 -0
  37. package/templates/core/02_adr.md +432 -0
  38. package/templates/core/03_generate_tasks.md +418 -0
  39. package/templates/core/04_process_task_list.md +430 -0
  40. package/templates/core/05_market_research.md +483 -0
  41. package/templates/core/06_architecture.md +561 -0
  42. package/templates/core/07_competitor_analysis.md +462 -0
  43. package/templates/core/08_personas.md +367 -0
  44. package/templates/core/09_user_journeys.md +385 -0
  45. package/templates/core/10_user_stories.md +582 -0
  46. package/templates/core/11_acceptance_criteria.md +687 -0
  47. package/templates/core/12_qa_gate.md +737 -0
  48. package/templates/core/13_risk_register.md +605 -0
  49. package/templates/core/14_project_brief.md +477 -0
  50. package/templates/core/15_brainstorming.md +653 -0
  51. package/templates/core/16_frontend_spec.md +1479 -0
  52. package/templates/core/17_test_plan.md +878 -0
  53. package/templates/core/18_release_plan.md +994 -0
  54. package/templates/core/19_operational_readiness.md +1100 -0
  55. package/templates/core/20_metrics_dashboard.md +1375 -0
  56. package/templates/core/21_postmortem.md +1122 -0
  57. package/templates/core/22_playtest_usability.md +1624 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
1
+ # 👥 User Personas & Target Audience Analysis
2
+
3
+ **Metadata**
4
+ - Last Updated: {{DATE}}
5
+ - Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
6
+
7
+ > **🎯 Purpose**
8
+ > Detailed user persona profiles based on research and data to guide product development, marketing strategies, and user experience design. These personas represent real user segments with specific needs, behaviors, and characteristics.
9
+
10
+ ---
11
+
12
+ ## 🎭 Primary Persona: Enterprise Decision Maker
13
+
14
+ ### 📊 Demographics & Profile
15
+ **Name:** Sarah Chen - Chief Technology Officer
16
+ **Age:** 42
17
+ **Location:** San Francisco Bay Area
18
+ **Education:** MS Computer Science, MBA
19
+ **Company:** Mid-size technology company (500-2000 employees)
20
+ **Industry:** SaaS, FinTech, HealthTech
21
+
22
+ ### 💼 Professional Context
23
+ **Role & Responsibilities:**
24
+ - Technology strategy and architecture decisions
25
+ - Team management (50+ engineers across 5 teams)
26
+ - Budget authority ($5M+ annual technology spend)
27
+ - Vendor evaluation and procurement oversight
28
+ - Digital transformation initiatives
29
+
30
+ **Reporting Structure:**
31
+ - Reports to: CEO
32
+ - Direct Reports: VP Engineering, VP Data, Security Director
33
+ - Cross-functional: Works closely with Product, Sales, Marketing
34
+
35
+ **Key Performance Metrics:**
36
+ - System uptime and reliability (99.9% SLA)
37
+ - Development velocity and time-to-market
38
+ - Technology ROI and cost optimization
39
+ - Security and compliance adherence
40
+ - Team productivity and satisfaction
41
+
42
+ ### 🎯 Goals & Motivations
43
+ **Primary Goals:**
44
+ 1. **Modernize Technology Stack** - Replace legacy systems with scalable solutions
45
+ 2. **Improve Development Velocity** - Enable faster feature delivery
46
+ 3. **Ensure Security & Compliance** - Meet SOC 2, GDPR requirements
47
+ 4. **Optimize Costs** - Reduce total cost of ownership by 20%
48
+ 5. **Attract Top Talent** - Build reputation as innovative technology organization
49
+
50
+ **Success Metrics:**
51
+ - Faster deployment cycles (weekly vs. monthly)
52
+ - Reduced infrastructure costs
53
+ - Improved developer experience scores
54
+ - Zero security incidents
55
+ - Industry recognition and awards
56
+
57
+ ### 😤 Pain Points & Frustrations
58
+ **Current Challenges:**
59
+ 1. **Legacy System Complexity** - 10+ year old monolithic architecture
60
+ 2. **Vendor Lock-in** - Difficult and expensive to switch providers
61
+ 3. **Implementation Delays** - 6-12 month deployment cycles
62
+ 4. **Hidden Costs** - Unpredictable pricing and professional services fees
63
+ 5. **Poor User Experience** - Complex interfaces requiring extensive training
64
+
65
+ **Daily Frustrations:**
66
+ - Waiting for vendor support responses
67
+ - Explaining technology decisions to non-technical executives
68
+ - Managing multiple vendor relationships
69
+ - Dealing with system downtime and performance issues
70
+ - Coordinating between development teams and external vendors
71
+
72
+ ### 🛠️ Technology Environment
73
+ **Current Tools & Systems:**
74
+ - Cloud Infrastructure: AWS (primary), some Azure
75
+ - Development: GitHub, Jenkins, Docker
76
+ - Monitoring: New Relic, PagerDuty
77
+ - Communication: Slack, Zoom
78
+ - Enterprise Software: Salesforce, Workday, Confluence
79
+
80
+ **Technology Preferences:**
81
+ - Cloud-native solutions over on-premise
82
+ - API-first architecture for integrations
83
+ - Self-service capabilities for teams
84
+ - Transparent pricing models
85
+ - Strong security and compliance features
86
+
87
+ ### 💰 Buying Behavior & Decision Process
88
+ **Budget Authority:** $500K+ individual decisions, $1M+ with board approval
89
+ **Decision Timeline:** 3-6 months for major platform decisions
90
+ **Evaluation Process:**
91
+ 1. **Problem Identification** (Month 1)
92
+ 2. **Vendor Research & RFP** (Month 2-3)
93
+ 3. **Proof of Concept** (Month 4)
94
+ 4. **Stakeholder Alignment** (Month 5)
95
+ 5. **Contract Negotiation** (Month 6)
96
+
97
+ **Key Decision Criteria:**
98
+ - Technical fit and architecture alignment (30%)
99
+ - Total cost of ownership (25%)
100
+ - Implementation timeline and risk (20%)
101
+ - Vendor stability and roadmap (15%)
102
+ - Reference customers and case studies (10%)
103
+
104
+ **Stakeholders Involved:**
105
+ - Primary Influencer: VP Engineering (technical evaluation)
106
+ - Economic Buyer: CFO (budget approval)
107
+ - End Users: Development teams (usability feedback)
108
+ - Compliance: Security/Legal teams (risk assessment)
109
+
110
+ ### 📱 Information Sources & Channels
111
+ **Research Channels:**
112
+ - Industry conferences (AWS re:Invent, Strata, O'Reilly)
113
+ - Peer networks and CTO groups
114
+ - Industry analyst reports (Gartner, Forrester)
115
+ - Technical publications (InfoQ, IEEE)
116
+ - Vendor webinars and demos
117
+
118
+ **Preferred Communication:**
119
+ - Email for detailed information and documentation
120
+ - Video calls for demos and technical discussions
121
+ - LinkedIn for industry insights and connections
122
+ - Technical blogs and whitepapers
123
+ - Executive briefings and strategy sessions
124
+
125
+ ### 🎨 User Experience Preferences
126
+ **Interface Preferences:**
127
+ - Clean, modern design with minimal clutter
128
+ - Dashboard-style overview with drill-down capabilities
129
+ - Mobile-responsive for on-the-go access
130
+ - Customizable views for different stakeholders
131
+ - Strong data visualization and reporting
132
+
133
+ **Support Expectations:**
134
+ - 24/7 technical support for critical issues
135
+ - Dedicated customer success manager
136
+ - Regular business reviews and strategic planning
137
+ - Access to product roadmap and beta features
138
+ - Training and certification programs
139
+
140
+ ---
141
+
142
+ ## 🧑‍💻 Secondary Persona: Engineering Manager
143
+
144
+ ### 📊 Demographics & Profile
145
+ **Name:** Marcus Rodriguez - VP of Engineering
146
+ **Age:** 38
147
+ **Location:** Austin, Texas
148
+ **Education:** BS Computer Science, MS Software Engineering
149
+ **Company:** Growing startup (100-500 employees)
150
+ **Industry:** E-commerce, Media, Gaming
151
+
152
+ ### 💼 Professional Context
153
+ **Role & Responsibilities:**
154
+ - Lead engineering team of 20-30 developers
155
+ - Technical architecture and implementation decisions
156
+ - Development process optimization
157
+ - Product delivery and quality assurance
158
+ - Team hiring and professional development
159
+
160
+ **Daily Activities:**
161
+ - Code reviews and technical guidance
162
+ - Sprint planning and backlog management
163
+ - Cross-functional meetings with Product and Design
164
+ - Vendor evaluation and tool selection
165
+ - Team mentoring and performance reviews
166
+
167
+ ### 🎯 Goals & Pain Points
168
+ **Primary Goals:**
169
+ - Increase development velocity by 50%
170
+ - Improve code quality and reduce bugs
171
+ - Build scalable systems for rapid growth
172
+ - Enhance developer experience and productivity
173
+ - Establish engineering best practices
174
+
175
+ **Major Pain Points:**
176
+ - Manual deployment processes slow down releases
177
+ - Debugging distributed systems is time-consuming
178
+ - Lack of visibility into system performance
179
+ - Difficult to onboard new team members
180
+ - Too much time spent on operations vs. features
181
+
182
+ ### 🛠️ Technical Requirements
183
+ **Must-Have Features:**
184
+ - RESTful APIs with comprehensive documentation
185
+ - Real-time monitoring and alerting
186
+ - Automated testing and deployment pipelines
187
+ - Developer-friendly SDKs and tools
188
+ - Detailed audit logs and analytics
189
+
190
+ **Integration Needs:**
191
+ - GitHub/GitLab for source control
192
+ - Slack for team communication
193
+ - JIRA for project management
194
+ - Monitoring tools (DataDog, New Relic)
195
+ - Cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure)
196
+
197
+ ### 💰 Budget & Decision Influence
198
+ **Budget Influence:** Recommends tools up to $50K annually
199
+ **Decision Role:** Primary technical evaluator and influencer
200
+ **Evaluation Criteria:**
201
+ - Technical capabilities and API quality
202
+ - Developer experience and ease of use
203
+ - Documentation and community support
204
+ - Pricing transparency and scalability
205
+ - Integration ecosystem
206
+
207
+ ---
208
+
209
+ ## 👨‍💼 Tertiary Persona: Business Operations Manager
210
+
211
+ ### 📊 Demographics & Profile
212
+ **Name:** Jennifer Kim - Director of Business Operations
213
+ **Age:** 35
214
+ **Location:** Seattle, Washington
215
+ **Education:** MBA, BS Business Administration
216
+ **Company:** Mid-market services company (200-1000 employees)
217
+ **Industry:** Professional Services, Consulting, Agency
218
+
219
+ ### 💼 Professional Context
220
+ **Role & Responsibilities:**
221
+ - Business process optimization and automation
222
+ - Cross-departmental workflow coordination
223
+ - Vendor management and procurement
224
+ - Data analysis and business intelligence
225
+ - Change management and training
226
+
227
+ ### 🎯 Goals & Pain Points
228
+ **Primary Goals:**
229
+ - Streamline operations and reduce manual work
230
+ - Improve data visibility and reporting
231
+ - Ensure compliance with industry regulations
232
+ - Reduce operational costs by 15%
233
+ - Enable business scaling without proportional headcount
234
+
235
+ **Major Pain Points:**
236
+ - Disconnected systems requiring manual data entry
237
+ - Limited visibility into cross-departmental processes
238
+ - Difficulty generating comprehensive reports
239
+ - Resistance to change from team members
240
+ - Vendor coordination and communication challenges
241
+
242
+ ### 🛠️ Feature Requirements
243
+ **Essential Capabilities:**
244
+ - Workflow automation and business rules
245
+ - Custom reporting and dashboard creation
246
+ - User permission management and access controls
247
+ - Integration with existing business systems
248
+ - Mobile access for remote team members
249
+
250
+ **Success Metrics:**
251
+ - Reduced manual processing time
252
+ - Improved data accuracy and consistency
253
+ - Faster report generation
254
+ - Higher user adoption rates
255
+ - Measurable cost savings
256
+
257
+ ---
258
+
259
+ ## 🚫 Anti-Persona: DIY Technical Hobbyist
260
+
261
+ ### 📊 Profile
262
+ **Name:** Alex Thompson - Solo Developer/Freelancer
263
+ **Characteristics:**
264
+ - Prefers building custom solutions over buying
265
+ - Price-sensitive with limited budget (<$100/month)
266
+ - Technical expertise but limited time
267
+ - Values complete control over implementation
268
+ - Works primarily on personal projects
269
+
270
+ ### ❌ Why Not Our Target
271
+ **Misaligned Needs:**
272
+ - Wants free or very low-cost solutions
273
+ - Prefers open-source alternatives
274
+ - Limited scaling requirements
275
+ - Enjoys the technical challenge of building
276
+ - No enterprise compliance needs
277
+
278
+ **Resource Constraints:**
279
+ - Cannot afford professional support
280
+ - Limited time for vendor relationships
281
+ - No procurement process or budget approval
282
+ - Doesn't value business-focused features
283
+ - Prefers technical documentation over business value
284
+
285
+ ---
286
+
287
+ ## 📊 Persona Validation & Research
288
+
289
+ ### 🔍 Research Methodology
290
+ **Data Sources:**
291
+ - Customer interviews (50+ interviews across segments)
292
+ - User analytics and behavior data
293
+ - Customer support ticket analysis
294
+ - Sales conversation recordings
295
+ - Survey responses (1,000+ respondents)
296
+
297
+ **Validation Techniques:**
298
+ - A/B testing different messaging approaches
299
+ - Customer journey mapping exercises
300
+ - Win/loss interview analysis
301
+ - Product usage pattern analysis
302
+ - Support escalation pattern review
303
+
304
+ ### 📈 Persona Distribution
305
+ **Market Segment Breakdown:**
306
+ - Enterprise Decision Makers: 40% of revenue, 15% of users
307
+ - Engineering Managers: 35% of revenue, 25% of users
308
+ - Business Operations: 20% of revenue, 45% of users
309
+ - Other Segments: 5% of revenue, 15% of users
310
+
311
+ **Geographic Distribution:**
312
+ - North America: 60%
313
+ - Europe: 25%
314
+ - Asia-Pacific: 10%
315
+ - Other: 5%
316
+
317
+ ### 🎯 Persona-Driven Product Strategy
318
+ **Feature Prioritization:**
319
+ 1. **Enterprise Features** (Sarah) - Security, compliance, enterprise integrations
320
+ 2. **Developer Experience** (Marcus) - APIs, documentation, developer tools
321
+ 3. **Business Intelligence** (Jennifer) - Reporting, analytics, workflow automation
322
+
323
+ **Marketing Message Hierarchy:**
324
+ - **Primary:** Enterprise-grade security and scalability
325
+ - **Secondary:** Developer-friendly implementation
326
+ - **Tertiary:** Business process optimization
327
+
328
+ ---
329
+
330
+ ## 🔄 Persona Maintenance & Updates
331
+
332
+ ### 📅 Review Schedule
333
+ **Quarterly Reviews:**
334
+ - Customer interview insights
335
+ - Product usage pattern changes
336
+ - Market feedback and competitive analysis
337
+ - Support ticket trend analysis
338
+
339
+ **Annual Deep Dive:**
340
+ - Comprehensive persona validation study
341
+ - Market segment evolution analysis
342
+ - New persona identification
343
+ - Anti-persona validation
344
+
345
+ ### 📊 Key Performance Indicators
346
+ **Persona Accuracy Metrics:**
347
+ - Customer interview alignment score: >80%
348
+ - Message resonance testing: >70% positive
349
+ - Product feature adoption by persona: >60%
350
+ - Sales conversion by persona segment: Tracked monthly
351
+
352
+ **Persona Effectiveness:**
353
+ - Marketing qualified lead quality improvement
354
+ - Sales cycle reduction by targeted messaging
355
+ - Product feature adoption rates
356
+ - Customer satisfaction scores by persona
357
+
358
+ ---
359
+
360
+ **👥 Persona Success Metrics:**
361
+ - Marketing message resonance >70%
362
+ - Product adoption aligned with persona needs
363
+ - Sales cycle optimization by persona
364
+ - Customer satisfaction scores >8.5/10
365
+ - Feature prioritization alignment with persona value
366
+
367
+ **Next Steps:** Use personas to inform user journey mapping (09_user_journeys.md) and guide product development decisions.