@heyai-rules/pilo-masterkit 1.2.2 → 2.2.0

package/.agent/skills/laravel-verification/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+---
+name: laravel-verification
+description: "Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness."
+origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Laravel Verification Loop
+
+Run before PRs, after major changes, and pre-deploy.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Before opening a pull request for a Laravel project
+- After major refactors or dependency upgrades
+- Pre-deployment verification for staging or production
+- Running full lint -> test -> security -> deploy readiness pipeline
+
+## How It Works
+
+- Run phases sequentially from environment checks through deployment readiness so each layer builds on the last.
+- Environment and Composer checks gate everything else; stop immediately if they fail.
+- Linting/static analysis should be clean before running full tests and coverage.
+- Security and migration reviews happen after tests so you verify behavior before data or release steps.
+- Build/deploy readiness and queue/scheduler checks are final gates; any failure blocks release.
+
+## Phase 1: Environment Checks
+
+```bash
+php -v
+composer --version
+php artisan --version
+```
+
+- Verify `.env` is present and required keys exist
+- Confirm `APP_DEBUG=false` for production environments
+- Confirm `APP_ENV` matches the target deployment (`production`, `staging`)
+
+If using Laravel Sail locally:
+
+```bash
+./vendor/bin/sail php -v
+./vendor/bin/sail artisan --version
+```
+
+## Phase 1.5: Composer and Autoload
+
+```bash
+composer validate
+composer dump-autoload -o
+```
+
+## Phase 2: Linting and Static Analysis
+
+```bash
+vendor/bin/pint --test
+vendor/bin/phpstan analyse
+```
+
+If your project uses Psalm instead of PHPStan:
+
+```bash
+vendor/bin/psalm
+```
+
+## Phase 3: Tests and Coverage
+
+```bash
+php artisan test
+```
+
+Coverage (CI):
+
+```bash
+XDEBUG_MODE=coverage php artisan test --coverage
+```
+
+CI example (format -> static analysis -> tests):
+
+```bash
+vendor/bin/pint --test
+vendor/bin/phpstan analyse
+XDEBUG_MODE=coverage php artisan test --coverage
+```
+
+## Phase 4: Security and Dependency Checks
+
+```bash
+composer audit
+```
+
+## Phase 5: Database and Migrations
+
+```bash
+php artisan migrate --pretend
+php artisan migrate:status
+```
+
+- Review destructive migrations carefully
+- Ensure migration filenames follow `Y_m_d_His_*` (e.g., `2025_03_14_154210_create_orders_table.php`) and describe the change clearly
+- Ensure rollbacks are possible
+- Verify `down()` methods and avoid irreversible data loss without explicit backups
+
+## Phase 6: Build and Deployment Readiness
+
+```bash
+php artisan optimize:clear
+php artisan config:cache
+php artisan route:cache
+php artisan view:cache
+```
+
+- Ensure cache warmups succeed in production configuration
+- Verify queue workers and scheduler are configured
+- Confirm `storage/` and `bootstrap/cache/` are writable in the target environment
+
+## Phase 7: Queue and Scheduler Checks
+
+```bash
+php artisan schedule:list
+php artisan queue:failed
+```
+
+If Horizon is used:
+
+```bash
+php artisan horizon:status
+```
+
+If `queue:monitor` is available, use it to check backlog without processing jobs:
+
+```bash
+php artisan queue:monitor default --max=100
+```
+
+Active verification (staging only): dispatch a no-op job to a dedicated queue and run a single worker to process it (ensure a non-`sync` queue connection is configured).
+
+```bash
+php artisan tinker --execute="dispatch((new App\\Jobs\\QueueHealthcheck())->onQueue('healthcheck'))"
+php artisan queue:work --once --queue=healthcheck
+```
+
+Verify the job produced the expected side effect (log entry, healthcheck table row, or metric).
+
+Only run this on non-production environments where processing a test job is safe.
+
+## Examples
+
+Minimal flow:
+
+```bash
+php -v
+composer --version
+php artisan --version
+composer validate
+vendor/bin/pint --test
+vendor/bin/phpstan analyse
+php artisan test
+composer audit
+php artisan migrate --pretend
+php artisan config:cache
+php artisan queue:failed
+```
+
+CI-style pipeline:
+
+```bash
+composer validate
+composer dump-autoload -o
+vendor/bin/pint --test
+vendor/bin/phpstan analyse
+XDEBUG_MODE=coverage php artisan test --coverage
+composer audit
+php artisan migrate --pretend
+php artisan optimize:clear
+php artisan config:cache
+php artisan route:cache
+php artisan view:cache
+php artisan schedule:list
+```

package/.agent/skills/lead-intelligence/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+---
+name: lead-intelligence
+description: AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, source-derived voice modeling, and channel-specific outreach across email, LinkedIn, and X. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts.
+origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Lead Intelligence
+
+Agent-powered lead intelligence pipeline that finds, scores, and reaches high-value contacts through social graph analysis and warm path discovery.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- User wants to find leads or prospects in a specific industry
+- Building an outreach list for partnerships, sales, or fundraising
+- Researching who to reach out to and the best path to reach them
+- User says "find leads", "outreach list", "who should I reach out to", "warm intros"
+- Needs to score or rank a list of contacts by relevance
+- Wants to map mutual connections to find warm introduction paths
+
+## Tool Requirements
+
+### Required
+- **Exa MCP** — Deep web search for people, companies, and signals (`web_search_exa`)
+- **X API** — Follower/following graph, mutual analysis, recent activity (`X_BEARER_TOKEN`, plus write-context credentials such as `X_CONSUMER_KEY`, `X_CONSUMER_SECRET`, `X_ACCESS_TOKEN`, `X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET`)
+
+### Optional (enhance results)
+- **LinkedIn** — Direct API if available, otherwise browser control for search, profile inspection, and drafting
+- **Apollo/Clay API** — For enrichment cross-reference if user has access
+- **GitHub MCP** — For developer-centric lead qualification
+- **Apple Mail / Mail.app** — Draft cold or warm email without sending automatically
+- **Browser control** — For LinkedIn and X when API coverage is missing or constrained
+
+## Pipeline Overview
+
+```
+┌─────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐
+│ 1. Signal   │────>│ 2. Mutual    │────>│ 3. Warm Path    │────>│ 4. Enrich    │────>│ 5. Outreach     │
+│    Scoring  │     │    Ranking   │     │    Discovery    │     │              │     │    Draft        │
+└─────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └─────────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └─────────────────┘
+```
+
+## Voice Before Outreach
+
+Do not draft outbound from generic sales copy.
+
+Run `brand-voice` first whenever the user's voice matters. Reuse its `VOICE PROFILE` instead of re-deriving style ad hoc inside this skill.
+
+If live X access is available, pull recent original posts before drafting. If not, use supplied examples or the best repo/site material available.
+
+## Stage 1: Signal Scoring
+
+Search for high-signal people in target verticals. Assign a weight to each based on:
+
+| Signal | Weight | Source |
+|--------|--------|--------|
+| Role/title alignment | 30% | Exa, LinkedIn |
+| Industry match | 25% | Exa company search |
+| Recent activity on topic | 20% | X API search, Exa |
+| Follower count / influence | 10% | X API |
+| Location proximity | 10% | Exa, LinkedIn |
+| Engagement with your content | 5% | X API interactions |
+
+### Signal Search Approach
+
+```python
+# Step 1: Define target parameters
+target_verticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"]
+target_roles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"]
+target_locations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
+
+# Step 2: Exa deep search for people
+for vertical in target_verticals:
+    results = web_search_exa(
+        query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO",
+        category="company",
+        numResults=20
+    )
+    # Score each result
+
+# Step 3: X API search for active voices
+x_search = search_recent_tweets(
+    query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools",
+    max_results=100
+)
+# Extract and score unique authors
+```
+
+## Stage 2: Mutual Ranking
+
+For each scored target, analyze the user's social graph to find the warmest path.
+
+### Ranking Model
+
+1. Pull user's X following list and LinkedIn connections
+2. For each high-signal target, check for shared connections
+3. Apply the `social-graph-ranker` model to score bridge value
+4. Rank mutuals by:
+
+| Factor | Weight |
+|--------|--------|
+| Number of connections to targets | 40% — highest weight, most connections = highest rank |
+| Mutual's current role/company | 20% — decision maker vs individual contributor |
+| Mutual's location | 15% — same city = easier intro |
+| Industry alignment | 15% — same vertical = natural intro |
+| Mutual's X handle / LinkedIn | 10% — identifiability for outreach |
+
+Canonical rule:
+
+```text
+Use social-graph-ranker when the user wants the graph math itself,
+the bridge ranking as a standalone report, or explicit decay-model tuning.
+```
+
+Inside this skill, use the same weighted bridge model:
+
+```text
+B(m) = Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m,t) - 1)
+R(m) = B_ext(m) · (1 + β · engagement(m))
+```
+
+Interpretation:
+- Tier 1: high `R(m)` and direct bridge paths -> warm intro asks
+- Tier 2: medium `R(m)` and one-hop bridge paths -> conditional intro asks
+- Tier 3: no viable bridge -> direct cold outreach using the same lead record
+
+### Output Format
+
+```
+
+If the user explicitly wants the ranking engine broken out, the math visualized, or the network scored outside the full lead workflow, run `social-graph-ranker` as a standalone pass first and feed the result back into this pipeline.
+MUTUAL RANKING REPORT
+=====================
+
+#1  @mutual_handle (Score: 92)
+    Name: Jane Smith
+    Role: Partner @ Acme Ventures
+    Location: San Francisco
+    Connections to targets: 7
+    Connected to: @target1, @target2, @target3, @target4, @target5, @target6, @target7
+    Best intro path: Jane invested in Target1's company
+
+#2  @mutual_handle2 (Score: 85)
+    ...
+```
+
+## Stage 3: Warm Path Discovery
+
+For each target, find the shortest introduction chain:
+
+```
+You ──[follows]──> Mutual A ──[invested in]──> Target Company
+You ──[follows]──> Mutual B ──[co-founded with]──> Target Person
+You ──[met at]──> Event ──[also attended]──> Target Person
+```
+
+### Path Types (ordered by warmth)
+1. **Direct mutual** — You both follow/know the same person
+2. **Portfolio connection** — Mutual invested in or advises target's company
+3. **Co-worker/alumni** — Mutual worked at same company or attended same school
+4. **Event overlap** — Both attended same conference/program
+5. **Content engagement** — Target engaged with mutual's content or vice versa
+
+## Stage 4: Enrichment
+
+For each qualified lead, pull:
+
+- Full name, current title, company
+- Company size, funding stage, recent news
+- Recent X posts (last 30 days) — topics, tone, interests
+- Mutual interests with user (shared follows, similar content)
+- Recent company events (product launch, funding round, hiring)
+
+### Enrichment Sources
+- Exa: company data, news, blog posts
+- X API: recent tweets, bio, followers
+- GitHub: open source contributions (for developer-centric leads)
+- LinkedIn (via browser-use): full profile, experience, education
+
+## Stage 5: Outreach Draft
+
+Generate personalized outreach for each lead. The draft should match the source-derived voice profile and the target channel.
+
+### Channel Rules
+
+#### Email
+
+- Use for the highest-value cold outreach, warm intros, investor outreach, and partnership asks
+- Default to drafting in Apple Mail / Mail.app when local desktop control is available
+- Create drafts first, do not send automatically unless the user explicitly asks
+- Subject line should be plain and specific, not clever
+
+#### LinkedIn
+
+- Use when the target is active there, when mutual graph context is stronger on LinkedIn, or when email confidence is low
+- Prefer API access if available
+- Otherwise use browser control to inspect profiles, recent activity, and draft the message
+- Keep it shorter than email and avoid fake professional warmth
+
+#### X
+
+- Use for high-context operator, builder, or investor outreach where public posting behavior matters
+- Prefer API access for search, timeline, and engagement analysis
+- Fall back to browser control when needed
+- DMs and public replies should be much tighter than email and should reference something real from the target's timeline
+
+#### Channel Selection Heuristic
+
+Pick one primary channel in this order:
+
+1. warm intro by email
+2. direct email
+3. LinkedIn DM
+4. X DM or reply
+
+Use multi-channel only when there is a strong reason and the cadence will not feel spammy.
+
+### Warm Intro Request (to mutual)
+
+Goal:
+
+- one clear ask
+- one concrete reason this intro makes sense
+- easy-to-forward blurb if needed
+
+Avoid:
+
+- overexplaining your company
+- social-proof stacking
+- sounding like a fundraiser template
+
+### Direct Cold Outreach (to target)
+
+Goal:
+
+- open from something specific and recent
+- explain why the fit is real
+- make one low-friction ask
+
+Avoid:
+
+- generic admiration
+- feature dumping
+- broad asks like "would love to connect"
+- forced rhetorical questions
+
+### Execution Pattern
+
+For each target, produce:
+
+1. the recommended channel
+2. the reason that channel is best
+3. the message draft
+4. optional follow-up draft
+5. if email is the chosen channel and Apple Mail is available, create a draft instead of only returning text
+
+If browser control is available:
+
+- LinkedIn: inspect target profile, recent activity, and mutual context, then draft or prepare the message
+- X: inspect recent posts or replies, then draft DM or public reply language
+
+If desktop automation is available:
+
+- Apple Mail: create draft email with subject, body, and recipient
+
+Do not send messages automatically without explicit user approval.
+
+### Anti-Patterns
+
+- generic templates with no personalization
+- long paragraphs explaining your whole company
+- multiple asks in one message
+- fake familiarity without specifics
+- bulk-sent messages with visible merge fields
+- identical copy reused for email, LinkedIn, and X
+- platform-shaped slop instead of the author's actual voice
+
+## Configuration
+
+Users should set these environment variables:
+
+```bash
+# Required
+export X_BEARER_TOKEN="..."
+export X_ACCESS_TOKEN="..."
+export X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET="..."
+export X_CONSUMER_KEY="..."
+export X_CONSUMER_SECRET="..."
+export EXA_API_KEY="..."
+
+# Optional
+export LINKEDIN_COOKIE="..." # For browser-use LinkedIn access
+export APOLLO_API_KEY="..."  # For Apollo enrichment
+```
+
+## Agents
+
+This skill includes specialized agents in the `agents/` subdirectory:
+
+- **signal-scorer** — Searches and ranks prospects by relevance signals
+- **mutual-mapper** — Maps social graph connections and finds warm paths
+- **enrichment-agent** — Pulls detailed profile and company data
+- **outreach-drafter** — Generates personalized messages
+
+## Example Usage
+
+```
+User: find me the top 20 people in prediction markets I should reach out to
+
+Agent workflow:
+1. signal-scorer searches Exa and X for prediction market leaders
+2. mutual-mapper checks user's X graph for shared connections
+3. enrichment-agent pulls company data and recent activity
+4. outreach-drafter generates personalized messages for top ranked leads
+
+Output: Ranked list with warm paths, voice profile summary, and channel-specific outreach drafts or drafts-in-app
+```
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- `brand-voice` for canonical voice capture
+- `connections-optimizer` for review-first network pruning and expansion before outreach

package/.agent/skills/lead-intelligence/agents/enrichment-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+---
+name: enrichment-agent
+description: Pulls detailed profile, company, and activity data for qualified leads. Enriches prospects with recent news, funding data, content interests, and mutual overlap.
+tools:
+  - Bash
+  - Read
+  - WebSearch
+  - WebFetch
+model: sonnet
+---
+
+# Enrichment Agent
+
+You enrich qualified leads with detailed profile, company, and activity data.
+
+## Task
+
+Given a list of qualified prospects, pull comprehensive data from available sources to enable personalized outreach.
+
+## Data Points to Collect
+
+### Person
+- Full name, current title, company
+- X handle, LinkedIn URL, personal site
+- Recent posts (last 30 days) — topics, tone, key takes
+- Speaking engagements, podcast appearances
+- Open source contributions (if developer-centric)
+- Mutual interests with user (shared follows, similar content)
+
+### Company
+- Company name, size, stage
+- Funding history (last round amount, investors)
+- Recent news (product launches, pivots, hiring)
+- Tech stack (if relevant)
+- Competitors and market position
+
+### Activity Signals
+- Last X post date and topic
+- Recent blog posts or publications
+- Conference attendance
+- Job changes in last 6 months
+- Company milestones
+
+## Enrichment Sources
+
+1. **Exa** — Company data, news, blog posts, research
+2. **X API** — Recent tweets, bio, follower data
+3. **GitHub** — Open source profiles (if applicable)
+4. **Web** — Personal sites, company pages, press releases
+
+## Output Format
+
+```
+ENRICHED PROFILE: [Name]
+========================
+
+Person:
+  Title: [current role]
+  Company: [company name]
+  Location: [city]
+  X: @[handle] ([follower count] followers)
+  LinkedIn: [url]
+
+Company Intel:
+  Stage: [seed/A/B/growth/public]
+  Last Funding: $[amount] ([date]) led by [investor]
+  Headcount: ~[number]
+  Recent News: [1-2 bullet points]
+
+Recent Activity:
+  - [date]: [tweet/post summary]
+  - [date]: [tweet/post summary]
+  - [date]: [tweet/post summary]
+
+Personalization Hooks:
+  - [specific thing to reference in outreach]
+  - [shared interest or connection]
+  - [recent event or announcement to congratulate]
+```
+
+## Constraints
+
+- Only report verified data. Do not hallucinate company details.
+- If data is unavailable, note it as "not found" rather than guessing.
+- Prioritize recency — stale data older than 6 months should be flagged.

package/.agent/skills/lead-intelligence/agents/mutual-mapper.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+name: mutual-mapper
+description: Maps the user's social graph (X following, LinkedIn connections) against scored prospects to find mutual connections and rank them by introduction potential.
+tools:
+  - Bash
+  - Read
+  - Grep
+  - WebSearch
+  - WebFetch
+model: sonnet
+---
+
+# Mutual Mapper Agent
+
+You map social graph connections between the user and scored prospects to find warm introduction paths.
+
+## Task
+
+Given a list of scored prospects and the user's social accounts, find mutual connections and rank them by introduction potential.
+
+## Algorithm
+
+1. Pull the user's X following list (via X API)
+2. For each prospect, check if any of the user's followings also follow or are followed by the prospect
+3. For each mutual found, assess the strength of the connection
+4. Rank mutuals by their ability to make a warm introduction
+
+## Mutual Ranking Factors
+
+| Factor | Weight | Assessment |
+|--------|--------|------------|
+| Connections to targets | 40% | How many of the scored prospects does this mutual know? |
+| Mutual's role/influence | 20% | Decision maker, investor, or connector? |
+| Location match | 15% | Same city as user or target? |
+| Industry alignment | 15% | Works in the target vertical? |
+| Identifiability | 10% | Has clear X handle, LinkedIn, email? |
+
+## Warm Path Types
+
+Classify each path by warmth:
+
+1. **Direct mutual** (warmest) — Both user and target follow this person
+2. **Portfolio/advisory** — Mutual invested in or advises target's company
+3. **Co-worker/alumni** — Shared employer or educational institution
+4. **Event overlap** — Both attended same conference, accelerator, or program
+5. **Content engagement** — Target engaged with mutual's content recently
+
+## Output Format
+
+```
+WARM PATH REPORT
+================
+
+Target: [prospect name] (@handle)
+  Path 1 (warmth: direct mutual)
+    Via: @mutual_handle (Jane Smith, Partner @ Acme Ventures)
+    Relationship: Jane follows both you and the target
+    Suggested approach: Ask Jane for intro
+
+  Path 2 (warmth: portfolio)
+    Via: @mutual2 (Bob Jones, Angel Investor)
+    Relationship: Bob invested in target's company Series A
+    Suggested approach: Reference Bob's investment
+
+MUTUAL LEADERBOARD
+==================
+#1 @mutual_a — connected to 7 targets (Score: 92)
+#2 @mutual_b — connected to 5 targets (Score: 85)
+```
+
+## Constraints
+
+- Only report connections you can verify from API data or public profiles.
+- Do not assume connections exist based on similar bios or locations alone.
+- Flag uncertain connections with a confidence level.