@hestia-earth/guide 0.0.17 → 0.0.18

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals/cml2001Baseline.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer","Joseph Poore"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["CML2001 Baseline"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals"],"modelRequires":["resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsInputsProduction","resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsDuringCycle"]},"content":"# Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals\n\nThis model calculates the [Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals](/term/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals – ADP ultimate reserves\" measured in `kg Sb equivalent`.\n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_The results of this impact category shall be interpreted with caution, because the results of ADP after normalization may be overestimated. The European Commission intends to develop a new method moving from depletion to dissipation model to better quantify the potential for conservation of resources._\n>> JRC\n\n> Depletion of non-renewable resources and deprivation for future generations\n\nResource use, minerals and metals – EF impact category that addresses the use of non-renewable abiotic natural resources (minerals and metals).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals – ADP ultimate reserves\n\n> The basic idea behind this impact category is the same as the one behind the impact category resource use, fossils (namely, extracting a high concentration of resources today will force future generations to extract lower concentration or lower value resources).\n> The amount of mate rials contributing to resource depletion are converted into equivalents of kilograms of antimony (kg Sb eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                                                      | originally based on                                                                                    | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline) | [CML2002 model - Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) ultimate reserve](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [van Oers et al., 2002 as in CML 2002 method, v.4.8](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The overall approach (abiotic resource depletion – ADP, Guinée et al., 2002 and Van Oers et al., 2002) is not changed.\n> However the reference model for resource depletion of minerals and metals has changed from reserve base to ultimate reserves.\n> A more recent version of CFs (corresponding to CML v. 4.8) is recommended.\n> Energy carriers are now considered separately, and characterised as MJ equivalents, while mineral and metal resources are characterised in Sb-equivalents.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The CFs adopted are those implemented in the CML method v. 4.8 (2016).\n> Minor adaptations, explained below, have been adopted, in order to match the flow properties and units used in ILCD/EF flow list.\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n- [JRC Technical reports Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/PEF_method.pdf#%5B%7B%22num%22%3A80%2C%22gen%22%3A0%7D%2C%7B%22name%22%3A%22XYZ%22%7D%2C68%2C363%2C0%5D)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals\">abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/cml2001Baseline\">cml2001Baseline</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=resourceUse\">resourceUse</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsInputsProduction\">resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsInputsProduction</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsDuringCycle\">resourceUseMineralsAndMetalsDuringCycle</a> and a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#inputs\">inputs</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#units\">units</a> = <code>kg</code> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=material\">material</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=soilAmendment\">soilAmendment</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=otherInorganicChemical\">otherInorganicChemical</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><p>Different lookup files are used depending on the input material:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/soilAmendment.csv\">soilAmendment.csv</a> -&gt; <code>abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetalsCml2001Baseline</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/material.csv\">material.csv</a> -&gt; <code>abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetalsCml2001Baseline</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/otherInorganicChemical.csv\">otherInorganicChemical.csv</a> -&gt; <code>abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetalsCml2001Baseline</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer","Joseph Poore"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["CML2001 Baseline"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals\n\nThis model calculates the [Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals](/term/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals – ADP ultimate reserves\" measured in `kg Sb equivalent`.\n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_The results of this impact category shall be interpreted with caution, because the results of ADP after normalization may be overestimated. The European Commission intends to develop a new method moving from depletion to dissipation model to better quantify the potential for conservation of resources._\n>> JRC\n\n> Depletion of non-renewable resources and deprivation for future generations\n\nResource use, minerals and metals – EF impact category that addresses the use of non-renewable abiotic natural resources (minerals and metals).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals – ADP ultimate reserves\n\n> The basic idea behind this impact category is the same as the one behind the impact category resource use, fossils (namely, extracting a high concentration of resources today will force future generations to extract lower concentration or lower value resources).\n> The amount of mate rials contributing to resource depletion are converted into equivalents of kilograms of antimony (kg Sb eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                                                      | originally based on                                                                                    | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline) | [CML2002 model - Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) ultimate reserve](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [van Oers et al., 2002 as in CML 2002 method, v.4.8](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The overall approach (abiotic resource depletion – ADP, Guinée et al., 2002 and Van Oers et al., 2002) is not changed.\n> However the reference model for resource depletion of minerals and metals has changed from reserve base to ultimate reserves.\n> A more recent version of CFs (corresponding to CML v. 4.8) is recommended.\n> Energy carriers are now considered separately, and characterised as MJ equivalents, while mineral and metal resources are characterised in Sb-equivalents.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The CFs adopted are those implemented in the CML method v. 4.8 (2016).\n> Minor adaptations, explained below, have been adopted, in order to match the flow properties and units used in ILCD/EF flow list.\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n- [JRC Technical reports Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/PEF_method.pdf#%5B%7B%22num%22%3A80%2C%22gen%22%3A0%7D%2C%7B%22name%22%3A%22XYZ%22%7D%2C68%2C363%2C0%5D)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{},"content":"# Environmental Footprint v3.1"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Crenna, E., Secchi, M., Benini, L., & Sala, S. (2019). Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(10), 1851-1877.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-019-01604-y#Sec51)","[Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., & Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/2018_JRC_Weighting_EF.pdf)"]},"content":"# Environmental Footprint Single Overall Score\n\nThe inputs and outputs from the life cycle inventory are aggregated in 16 midpoint characterised impact categories.\n\nThese impact categories are then normalised (i.e., the results are divided by the overall inventory of a reference unit, e.g., the entire world, to convert the characterised impact categories in relative shares of the impacts of the analysed system) and weighted (i.e., each impact category is multiplied by a weighting factor to reflect their perceived relative importance).\n\nThe weighted impact categories can then be summed to obtain the EF single overall score. The number and the name of the impact categories is the same in EF3.0 and EF3.1.\n\n## Official guides\n\n- [Product Environmental Footprint method Understanding key concepts and how to implement them](https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/pef-method_en)\n- [Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)\n- [Learning materials - Everything you need to know on the EF methods](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/learning-materials_en)\n\n### What is a Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)\n\n> The Environmental Footprint (EF) methods, comprising the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF), provide harmonised rules for conducting a reliable and transparent assessment of the environmental impacts of products and organisations throughout the life-cycle, from extraction of raw materials to the end of life of products.\n>\n>Developed by the Commission in 2013 and updated in 2021, the Environmental Footprint methods provide companies with a reliable framework to quantify their environmental performance.\n> This fosters transparency, provides access to credible environmental information, and supports informed decision-making by businesses and consumers, ultimately driving the transition towards sustainability.\n\n### How the PEF method works\n\nFigure 1 shows the Environmental Footprint (EF), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) method.\n\nThe inputs and outputs from the life cycle inventory are aggregated in 16 midpoint characterised impact categories.\n\nThese impact categories are then **normalised** (i.e., the results are divided by the overall inventory of a reference unit, e.g., the entire world, to convert the characterised impact categories in relative shares of the impacts of the analysed system) and **weighted** (i.e., each impact category is multiplied by a weighting factor to reflect their perceived relative importance).\n\nThe weighted impact categories can then be summed to obtain the **EF single overall score**.\n\nThe number and the name of the impact categories is the same in EF3.0 and EF3.1.\n\n[![Figure 1: Diagram showing the pipeline for combining 16 impact categories into a single overall score](/assets/JRC130796_01_figure1.png \"Diagram showing the pipeline for combining 16 impact categories into a single overall score\")](https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130796)\n\n### PEF methods\n\nFor a comprehensive explanation of each EF method and impact category, see the EU page [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n\n#### PEF Methods on HESTIA\n\nHESTIA implements the following PEF methods:\n\n| PEF Indicator Name                           \t                                                                                                                | PEF Model                                                                                \t  | HESTIA Name                                                                                                                    | HESTIA Model                                                                                 \t          |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| [Acidification](/guide/poschEtAl2008-terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance#Posch%20et%20al%20(2008))                                         | Accumulated Exceedance (Seppälä et al. 2006, Posch et al, 2008)                           \t | [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance)    | [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008)                    \t                                          |\n| [Climate change](/guide/ipcc2021-gwp100#IPCC%20(2021))            \t                                                                                           | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Biogenic                      \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Fossil                        \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Land use and land use change  \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| [Ecotoxicity, freshwater](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                              | The EU revised version (originally based on USEtox2.1 model Fantke et al. 2017)     \t       | [Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (CTUe)](/term/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue)                                            | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1)                                  \t     |\n| [Eutrophication, marine](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-marineEutrophicationPotential#EUTREND%20model)                                                     | EUTREND model (Struijs et al, 2009) as implemented in ReCiPe                             \t  | [Marine eutrophication potential](/term/marineEutrophicationPotential)                                                         | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Eutrophication, freshwater](/guide/recipe2016Hierarchist-freshwaterEutrophicationPotential#ReCiPe%202016%20Hierarchist)                                      | EUTREND model (Struijs et al, 2009) as implemented in ReCiPe                             \t  | [Freshwater eutrophication potential](/term/freshwaterEutrophicationPotential)                                                 | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Eutrophication, terrestrial](/guide/poschEtAl2008-terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance#Posch%20et%20al%20(2008))                          | Accumulated Exceedance (Seppälä et al. 2006, Posch et al, 2008)                             | [Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance)  | [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008)                    \t                                          |\n| Human toxicity, cancer                                                                                                                                        | USEtox model 2.1 (Fankte et al, 2017)                                                    \t  | [Human toxicity potential, cancer (CTUh)](/term/humanToxicityPotentialCancerCtuh)                                              | [USEtox v2](/term/usetoxV2)                                  \t                                          |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer                                                                                                                                    | USEtox model 2.1 (Fankte et al, 2017)                                                    \t  | [Human toxicity potential, non-cancer (CTUh)](/term/humanToxicityPotentialNonCancerCtuh)                                       | [USEtox v2](/term/usetoxV2)                                  \t                                          |\n| [Ionising radiation, human health](/guide/frischknechtEtAl2000-ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq#Frischknecht%20et%20al%20(2000))                                    | Human health effect model as developed by Dreicer et al. 1995 (Frischknecht et al, 2000) \t  | [Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)](/term/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq)   \t                                                      | [Frischknecht et al (2000)](/term/frischknechtEtAl2000)      \t                                          |\n| [Land use total score](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                                | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, total land use effects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects)   \t                                    | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Land Occupation](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexLandOccupation)                                                                           | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, land occupation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation)      \t                                             | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Land Transformation](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexLandTransformation)                                                                   | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, land transformation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation)  \t                                         | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Ozone depletion](/guide/edip2003-ozoneDepletionPotential#EDIP%20(2003))                                                                                      | Steady-state ODPs as in (WMO 2014 + integrations)                                        \t  | [Ozone depletion potential](/term/ozoneDepletionPotential)                                                                     | [EDIP (2003)](/term/edip2003)                                \t                                          |\n| [EF-particulate matter](/guide/fantkeEtAl2016-damageToHumanHealthParticulateMatterFormation#Fantke%20et%20al%20(2016))                                        | PM method recommended by UNEP (UNEP 2016)                                                \t  | [Damage to human health, particulate matter formation](/term/damageToHumanHealthParticulateMatterFormation)     \t              | [Fantke et al (2016)](/term/fantkeEtAl2016)                  \t                                          |\n| [Photochemical ozone formation - human health](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq#LOTOS-EUROS%20model) \t | LOTOS-EUROS model (Van Zelm et al, 2008) as implemented in ReCiPe 2008                   \t  | [Photochemical ozone creation potential, human health (NMVOC eq)](/term/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq) | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Resource use > fossil fuels](/guide/cml2001Baseline-abioticResourceDepletionFossilFuels#CML2001%20Baseline)                                                  | CML 2002 (Guinée et al., 2002) and van Oers et al. 2002.                                 \t  | [Abiotic resource depletion, fossil fuels](/term/abioticResourceDepletionFossilFuels)                                          | [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline)                    \t                                          |\n| [Resource use > Metals and minerals](/guide/cml2001Baseline-abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals#CML2001%20Baseline)                                     | CML 2002 (Guinée et al., 2002) and van Oers et al. 2002.                                 \t  | [Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals](/term/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals)                             | [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline)                    \t                                          |\n| [Water use](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-scarcityWeightedWaterUse#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                                                      | Available WAter REmaining (AWARE) as recommended by UNEP, 2016                           \t  | [Scarcity weighted water use](/term/scarcityWeightedWaterUse)                                                                  | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1)                                      \t |\n\nEach [model](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) has unique input requirements and will only run if the Impact Assessment contains compatible [inputs](/glossary) / [emissions](/glossary?termType=emission) / [resources](/glossary?termType=resourceUse) / or even [mid-point Characterised Indicators](/glossary?query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicator) from other models.\n\nEach [model](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) will output one or more [Characterised Indicators](/glossary?page=1&query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicator)\n\nHESTIA PEF models sometimes accept more [Emissions](/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse)/[Resources](/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse)/[Inputs](/schema/Input) than the ones listed in [The official list of emissions, resources and land types accepted by the JRC](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx) when the impact category method accepts broad inputs, such as:\n- All fossil [fuels](/glossary?termType=fuel) or fuels that \"will no longer be available to future generations\".\n- All [LandCover](/glossary?termType=landCover) types that are not listed in [EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx) but are considered sub-categories of a existing JRC \"[Corine](https://land.copernicus.eu/content/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index.html)\" Land use type such as \"arable\" / \"urban\" / \"artificial areas\" / etc.\n\n### How individual PEF model indicators are calculated on HESTIA\n\nEach PEF model on HESTIA can be run individually locally, or online on the [hestia.earth Data Explorer](/explorer) platform.\n\nEach model requires different inputs to run and outputs [mid-point Characterised Indicators](/glossary?query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicators).\n\nSome models use [characterisation factors (CFs)](/glossary/lookups) specific to each country. If no regionalised CF is available for a given input, a default \"Global\" CF is used, referred to as [\"World\" aka `region-world`](/term/region-world) in HESTIA. \n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_The EU PEF can only be calculated using inputs recognised by the JRC.\nIf your impact assessment contains a HESTIA term that the JRC does not publish official factors for, then these inputs will be ignored!\nThis can produce erroneous PEF scores.\nTo prevent this, some models will produce error messages warning you about certain inputs.\nSome models will refuse to run if they encounter an input where no official JRC characterisation factor exists._\n\n#### The official list of emissions, resources and land types accepted by the JRC\nThe full list of emissions and inputs the JRC has based the PEF on, as well as their associated Characterisation factors, can be found here:\n[EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\nThe file contains multiple Excel sheets:\n- The second sheet, named \"**flows**\" contain the emissions, resources, and types of land the JRC has taken into consideration to create the PEF method.\n  - Most of these entries have an equivalent term in the [HESTIA glossary](/glossary). We are constantly updating the glossary and hope to eventually have an equivalent HESTIA term for each \"flow\" used by the JRC. To request a new entry be added to the glossary, please open a \"feature request\" issue [here](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-glossary/-/issues/new).\n  - The column named \"**FLOW_casnumber**\" often contains the official [CAS Registry Number](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_Registry_Number) of a chemical or resource. Sites like [cas.org](https://commonchemistry.cas.org/) or [Pubchem](https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) will provide more information on these entries.\n  -  It is advisable to use [Excel's](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/filter-data-in-a-range-or-table-01832226-31b5-4568-8806-38c37dcc180e) or [LibreOffice Calc's](https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/scalc/guide/filters.html) filter functions.\n- The 5th sheet, named \"**lciamethods_CF**\" contain the \"flows\" that are used to calculate the score of a given category.\n  - You can filter the \"**LCIAMethod_name**\" column to get a list of flows that the JRC has decreed contribute to a given category.\n  - Some PEF methods use \"regionalised\" characterisation factors to more precisely calculate the contribution of a given input. In order to see the default \"region-world\" CFs used when the country of the input is not known, apply a filter to the \"**LCIAMethod_location**\" column and only show rows with \"(empty)\" location. On HESTIA when no location information is provided, or the location has no equivalent to locations known to the JRC, the model will fallback to the default \"region-world\" CFs.\n\n### How normalised and weighted PEF model indicators are calculated on HESTIA\n\nAll midpoint Characterised Indicators present inside an Impact Assessment are collected and a \"weighting\" and \"normalisation\" factors are applied, giving each category a score in \"point\". These points are then summed up to produce a single score.\n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_If your impact assessment is missing information required by a PEF model, then that PEF model will not run. In this case your \"PEF Single Score\" will be missing categories and will produce a lower score that is not a true representation of your product's true PEF._\n\nThe official \"weighting\" and \"normalisation\" factors for EF3.1 (July 2022) are published by the [JRC](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFtransition.html) and can be downloaded as an excel file: [Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx).\nDocumentation on the latest updated factors can be found [here](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/145f8401-a82a-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1).\n\n#### Normalization Factors (NF) for Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1\n\n| Impact categories                       | Unit                                 | NF  (Rounded to 3 significant figures) |\n|:----------------------------------------|:-------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------|\n| Acidification                           | mol H+ eq./person                    | 55.6                                   |\n| Climate change                          | kg CO2 eq./person                    | 7550                                   |\n| Ecotoxicity, freshwater                 | CTUe/person                          | 56700                                  |\n| EF-particulate matter                   | disease incidences/person            | 0.000595                               |\n| Eutrophication, freshwater              | kg P eq./person                      | 1.61                                   |\n| Eutrophication, marine                  | kg N eq./person                      | 19.5                                   |\n| Eutrophication, terrestrial             | mol N eq./person                     | 177                                    |\n| Human toxicity, cancer                  | CTUh/person                          | 0.0000173                              |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer              | CTUh/person                          | 0.000129                               |\n| Ionising radiation                      | kBq U-235 eq./person                 | 4220                                   |\n| Land use\\*                              | pt/person                            | 819000                                 |\n| Ozone depletion                         | kg CFC-11 eq./person                 | 0.0523                                 |\n| Photochemical ozone formation           | kg NMVOC eq./person                  | 40.9                                   |\n| Resource depletion, fossils             | MJ/person                            | 65000                                  |\n| Resource depletion, minerals and metals | kg Sb eq./person                     | 0.0636                                 |\n| Water use\\*                             | m3 water eq of deprived water/person | 11500                                  |\n\n*For the calculation of the NF of the impact categories \"land use\" and \"water use\", refer to [Crenna et al (2019)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-019-01604-y#Sec51)\n\nNFs calculated based on global population of 6,895,889,018.\n\n#### Weighting factors (WF) for Environmental Footprint (EF)\n\n| Impact categories           | WF \\[%\\] |\n|:----------------------------|:---------|\n| Acidification               | 6.20%    |\n| Climate change              | 21.06%   |\n| Ecotoxicity, freshwater     | 1.92%    |\n| EF-particulate matter       | 8.96%    |\n| Eutrophication, freshwater  | 2.80%    |\n| Eutrophication, marine      | 2.96%    |\n| Eutrophication, terrestrial | 3.71%    |\n| Human toxicity, cancer      | 2.13%    |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer  | 1.84%    |\n| Ionising radiation          | 5.01%    |\n\nSource: [Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., & Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/2018_JRC_Weighting_EF.pdf)\n\n### References:\n- [About the Environmental Footprint Methods](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/about-environmental-footprint-methods_en)\n- [Product Environmental Footprint method Understanding key concepts and how to implement them](https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/pef-method_en)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [Characterisation Excel file factors EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n- [Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the environmental footprint 3.1 method](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/145f8401-a82a-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1)\n- [Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore/environmentalFootprintv31.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Crenna, E., Secchi, M., Benini, L., & Sala, S. (2019). Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(10), 1851-1877.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-019-01604-y#Sec51)","[Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., & Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/2018_JRC_Weighting_EF.pdf)"],"modelId":["environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore"]},"content":"# Environmental Footprint Single Overall Score\n\nThe inputs and outputs from the life cycle inventory are aggregated in 16 midpoint characterised impact categories.\n\nThese impact categories are then normalised (i.e., the results are divided by the overall inventory of a reference unit, e.g., the entire world, to convert the characterised impact categories in relative shares of the impacts of the analysed system) and weighted (i.e., each impact category is multiplied by a weighting factor to reflect their perceived relative importance).\n\nThe weighted impact categories can then be summed to obtain the EF single overall score. The number and the name of the impact categories is the same in EF3.0 and EF3.1.\n\n## Official guides\n\n- [Product Environmental Footprint method Understanding key concepts and how to implement them](https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/pef-method_en)\n- [Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)\n- [Learning materials - Everything you need to know on the EF methods](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/learning-materials_en)\n\n### What is a Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)\n\n> The Environmental Footprint (EF) methods, comprising the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF), provide harmonised rules for conducting a reliable and transparent assessment of the environmental impacts of products and organisations throughout the life-cycle, from extraction of raw materials to the end of life of products.\n>\n>Developed by the Commission in 2013 and updated in 2021, the Environmental Footprint methods provide companies with a reliable framework to quantify their environmental performance.\n> This fosters transparency, provides access to credible environmental information, and supports informed decision-making by businesses and consumers, ultimately driving the transition towards sustainability.\n\n### How the PEF method works\n\nFigure 1 shows the Environmental Footprint (EF), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) method.\n\nThe inputs and outputs from the life cycle inventory are aggregated in 16 midpoint characterised impact categories.\n\nThese impact categories are then **normalised** (i.e., the results are divided by the overall inventory of a reference unit, e.g., the entire world, to convert the characterised impact categories in relative shares of the impacts of the analysed system) and **weighted** (i.e., each impact category is multiplied by a weighting factor to reflect their perceived relative importance).\n\nThe weighted impact categories can then be summed to obtain the **EF single overall score**.\n\nThe number and the name of the impact categories is the same in EF3.0 and EF3.1.\n\n[![Figure 1: Diagram showing the pipeline for combining 16 impact categories into a single overall score](/assets/JRC130796_01_figure1.png \"Diagram showing the pipeline for combining 16 impact categories into a single overall score\")](https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130796)\n\n### PEF methods\n\nFor a comprehensive explanation of each EF method and impact category, see the EU page [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n\n#### PEF Methods on HESTIA\n\nHESTIA implements the following PEF methods:\n\n| PEF Indicator Name                           \t                                                                                                                | PEF Model                                                                                \t  | HESTIA Name                                                                                                                    | HESTIA Model                                                                                 \t          |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| [Acidification](/guide/poschEtAl2008-terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance#Posch%20et%20al%20(2008))                                         | Accumulated Exceedance (Seppälä et al. 2006, Posch et al, 2008)                           \t | [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance)    | [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008)                    \t                                          |\n| [Climate change](/guide/ipcc2021-gwp100#IPCC%20(2021))            \t                                                                                           | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Biogenic                      \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Fossil                        \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| Climate change-Land use and land use change  \t                                                                                                                | Baseline model of 100 years of the IPCC (based on IPCC 2021)                             \t  | [GWP100](/term/gwp100)                                                                                                         | [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021)                                \t                                          |\n| [Ecotoxicity, freshwater](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                              | The EU revised version (originally based on USEtox2.1 model Fantke et al. 2017)     \t       | [Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (CTUe)](/term/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue)                                            | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1)                                  \t     |\n| [Eutrophication, marine](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-marineEutrophicationPotential#EUTREND%20model)                                                     | EUTREND model (Struijs et al, 2009) as implemented in ReCiPe                             \t  | [Marine eutrophication potential](/term/marineEutrophicationPotential)                                                         | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Eutrophication, freshwater](/guide/recipe2016Hierarchist-freshwaterEutrophicationPotential#ReCiPe%202016%20Hierarchist)                                      | EUTREND model (Struijs et al, 2009) as implemented in ReCiPe                             \t  | [Freshwater eutrophication potential](/term/freshwaterEutrophicationPotential)                                                 | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Eutrophication, terrestrial](/guide/poschEtAl2008-terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance#Posch%20et%20al%20(2008))                          | Accumulated Exceedance (Seppälä et al. 2006, Posch et al, 2008)                             | [Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance)  | [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008)                    \t                                          |\n| Human toxicity, cancer                                                                                                                                        | USEtox model 2.1 (Fankte et al, 2017)                                                    \t  | [Human toxicity potential, cancer (CTUh)](/term/humanToxicityPotentialCancerCtuh)                                              | [USEtox v2](/term/usetoxV2)                                  \t                                          |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer                                                                                                                                    | USEtox model 2.1 (Fankte et al, 2017)                                                    \t  | [Human toxicity potential, non-cancer (CTUh)](/term/humanToxicityPotentialNonCancerCtuh)                                       | [USEtox v2](/term/usetoxV2)                                  \t                                          |\n| [Ionising radiation, human health](/guide/frischknechtEtAl2000-ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq#Frischknecht%20et%20al%20(2000))                                    | Human health effect model as developed by Dreicer et al. 1995 (Frischknecht et al, 2000) \t  | [Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)](/term/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq)   \t                                                      | [Frischknecht et al (2000)](/term/frischknechtEtAl2000)      \t                                          |\n| [Land use total score](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                                | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, total land use effects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects)   \t                                    | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Land Occupation](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexLandOccupation)                                                                           | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, land occupation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation)      \t                                             | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Land Transformation](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-soilQualityIndexLandTransformation)                                                                   | The EU revised version (originally based on LANCA)                                       \t  | [Soil quality index, land transformation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation)  \t                                         | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) \t                                      |\n| [Ozone depletion](/guide/edip2003-ozoneDepletionPotential#EDIP%20(2003))                                                                                      | Steady-state ODPs as in (WMO 2014 + integrations)                                        \t  | [Ozone depletion potential](/term/ozoneDepletionPotential)                                                                     | [EDIP (2003)](/term/edip2003)                                \t                                          |\n| [EF-particulate matter](/guide/fantkeEtAl2016-damageToHumanHealthParticulateMatterFormation#Fantke%20et%20al%20(2016))                                        | PM method recommended by UNEP (UNEP 2016)                                                \t  | [Damage to human health, particulate matter formation](/term/damageToHumanHealthParticulateMatterFormation)     \t              | [Fantke et al (2016)](/term/fantkeEtAl2016)                  \t                                          |\n| [Photochemical ozone formation - human health](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq#LOTOS-EUROS%20model) \t | LOTOS-EUROS model (Van Zelm et al, 2008) as implemented in ReCiPe 2008                   \t  | [Photochemical ozone creation potential, human health (NMVOC eq)](/term/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq) | [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist)       \t                                          |\n| [Resource use > fossil fuels](/guide/cml2001Baseline-abioticResourceDepletionFossilFuels#CML2001%20Baseline)                                                  | CML 2002 (Guinée et al., 2002) and van Oers et al. 2002.                                 \t  | [Abiotic resource depletion, fossil fuels](/term/abioticResourceDepletionFossilFuels)                                          | [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline)                    \t                                          |\n| [Resource use > Metals and minerals](/guide/cml2001Baseline-abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals#CML2001%20Baseline)                                     | CML 2002 (Guinée et al., 2002) and van Oers et al. 2002.                                 \t  | [Abiotic resource depletion, minerals and metals](/term/abioticResourceDepletionMineralsAndMetals)                             | [CML2001 Baseline](/term/cml2001Baseline)                    \t                                          |\n| [Water use](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-scarcityWeightedWaterUse#Environmental%20Footprint%20v3.1)                                                      | Available WAter REmaining (AWARE) as recommended by UNEP, 2016                           \t  | [Scarcity weighted water use](/term/scarcityWeightedWaterUse)                                                                  | [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1)                                      \t |\n\nEach [model](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) has unique input requirements and will only run if the Impact Assessment contains compatible [inputs](/glossary) / [emissions](/glossary?termType=emission) / [resources](/glossary?termType=resourceUse) / or even [mid-point Characterised Indicators](/glossary?query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicator) from other models.\n\nEach [model](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) will output one or more [Characterised Indicators](/glossary?page=1&query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicator)\n\nHESTIA PEF models sometimes accept more [Emissions](/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse)/[Resources](/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse)/[Inputs](/schema/Input) than the ones listed in [The official list of emissions, resources and land types accepted by the JRC](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx) when the impact category method accepts broad inputs, such as:\n- All fossil [fuels](/glossary?termType=fuel) or fuels that \"will no longer be available to future generations\".\n- All [LandCover](/glossary?termType=landCover) types that are not listed in [EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx) but are considered sub-categories of a existing JRC \"[Corine](https://land.copernicus.eu/content/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index.html)\" Land use type such as \"arable\" / \"urban\" / \"artificial areas\" / etc.\n\n### How individual PEF model indicators are calculated on HESTIA\n\nEach PEF model on HESTIA can be run individually locally, or online on the [hestia.earth Data Explorer](/explorer) platform.\n\nEach model requires different inputs to run and outputs [mid-point Characterised Indicators](/glossary?query=EC-JRC&termType=characterisedIndicators).\n\nSome models use [characterisation factors (CFs)](/glossary/lookups) specific to each country. If no regionalised CF is available for a given input, a default \"Global\" CF is used, referred to as [\"World\" aka `region-world`](/term/region-world) in HESTIA. \n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_The EU PEF can only be calculated using inputs recognised by the JRC.\nIf your impact assessment contains a HESTIA term that the JRC does not publish official factors for, then these inputs will be ignored!\nThis can produce erroneous PEF scores.\nTo prevent this, some models will produce error messages warning you about certain inputs.\nSome models will refuse to run if they encounter an input where no official JRC characterisation factor exists._\n\n#### The official list of emissions, resources and land types accepted by the JRC\nThe full list of emissions and inputs the JRC has based the PEF on, as well as their associated Characterisation factors, can be found here:\n[EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\nThe file contains multiple Excel sheets:\n- The second sheet, named \"**flows**\" contain the emissions, resources, and types of land the JRC has taken into consideration to create the PEF method.\n  - Most of these entries have an equivalent term in the [HESTIA glossary](/glossary). We are constantly updating the glossary and hope to eventually have an equivalent HESTIA term for each \"flow\" used by the JRC. To request a new entry be added to the glossary, please open a \"feature request\" issue [here](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-glossary/-/issues/new).\n  - The column named \"**FLOW_casnumber**\" often contains the official [CAS Registry Number](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_Registry_Number) of a chemical or resource. Sites like [cas.org](https://commonchemistry.cas.org/) or [Pubchem](https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) will provide more information on these entries.\n  -  It is advisable to use [Excel's](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/filter-data-in-a-range-or-table-01832226-31b5-4568-8806-38c37dcc180e) or [LibreOffice Calc's](https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/scalc/guide/filters.html) filter functions.\n- The 5th sheet, named \"**lciamethods_CF**\" contain the \"flows\" that are used to calculate the score of a given category.\n  - You can filter the \"**LCIAMethod_name**\" column to get a list of flows that the JRC has decreed contribute to a given category.\n  - Some PEF methods use \"regionalised\" characterisation factors to more precisely calculate the contribution of a given input. In order to see the default \"region-world\" CFs used when the country of the input is not known, apply a filter to the \"**LCIAMethod_location**\" column and only show rows with \"(empty)\" location. On HESTIA when no location information is provided, or the location has no equivalent to locations known to the JRC, the model will fallback to the default \"region-world\" CFs.\n\n### How normalised and weighted PEF model indicators are calculated on HESTIA\n\nAll midpoint Characterised Indicators present inside an Impact Assessment are collected and a \"weighting\" and \"normalisation\" factors are applied, giving each category a score in \"point\". These points are then summed up to produce a single score.\n\n#### ⚠️ WARNING\n_If your impact assessment is missing information required by a PEF model, then that PEF model will not run. In this case your \"PEF Single Score\" will be missing categories and will produce a lower score that is not a true representation of your product's true PEF._\n\nThe official \"weighting\" and \"normalisation\" factors for EF3.1 (July 2022) are published by the [JRC](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFtransition.html) and can be downloaded as an excel file: [Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx).\nDocumentation on the latest updated factors can be found [here](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/145f8401-a82a-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1).\n\n#### Normalization Factors (NF) for Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1\n\n| Impact categories                       | Unit                                 | NF  (Rounded to 3 significant figures) |\n|:----------------------------------------|:-------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------|\n| Acidification                           | mol H+ eq./person                    | 55.6                                   |\n| Climate change                          | kg CO2 eq./person                    | 7550                                   |\n| Ecotoxicity, freshwater                 | CTUe/person                          | 56700                                  |\n| EF-particulate matter                   | disease incidences/person            | 0.000595                               |\n| Eutrophication, freshwater              | kg P eq./person                      | 1.61                                   |\n| Eutrophication, marine                  | kg N eq./person                      | 19.5                                   |\n| Eutrophication, terrestrial             | mol N eq./person                     | 177                                    |\n| Human toxicity, cancer                  | CTUh/person                          | 0.0000173                              |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer              | CTUh/person                          | 0.000129                               |\n| Ionising radiation                      | kBq U-235 eq./person                 | 4220                                   |\n| Land use\\*                              | pt/person                            | 819000                                 |\n| Ozone depletion                         | kg CFC-11 eq./person                 | 0.0523                                 |\n| Photochemical ozone formation           | kg NMVOC eq./person                  | 40.9                                   |\n| Resource depletion, fossils             | MJ/person                            | 65000                                  |\n| Resource depletion, minerals and metals | kg Sb eq./person                     | 0.0636                                 |\n| Water use\\*                             | m3 water eq of deprived water/person | 11500                                  |\n\n*For the calculation of the NF of the impact categories \"land use\" and \"water use\", refer to [Crenna et al (2019)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-019-01604-y#Sec51)\n\nNFs calculated based on global population of 6,895,889,018.\n\n#### Weighting factors (WF) for Environmental Footprint (EF)\n\n| Impact categories           | WF \\[%\\] |\n|:----------------------------|:---------|\n| Acidification               | 6.20%    |\n| Climate change              | 21.06%   |\n| Ecotoxicity, freshwater     | 1.92%    |\n| EF-particulate matter       | 8.96%    |\n| Eutrophication, freshwater  | 2.80%    |\n| Eutrophication, marine      | 2.96%    |\n| Eutrophication, terrestrial | 3.71%    |\n| Human toxicity, cancer      | 2.13%    |\n| Human toxicity, non-cancer  | 1.84%    |\n| Ionising radiation          | 5.01%    |\n\nSource: [Sala, S., Cerutti, A. K., & Pant, R. (2018). Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/2018_JRC_Weighting_EF.pdf)\n\n### References:\n- [About the Environmental Footprint Methods](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/about-environmental-footprint-methods_en)\n- [Product Environmental Footprint method Understanding key concepts and how to implement them](https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/pef-method_en)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [Characterisation Excel file factors EF-LCIAMethod_CF(EF-v3.1).xlsx](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n- [Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the environmental footprint 3.1 method](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/145f8401-a82a-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1)\n- [Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/Normalisation_Weighting_Factors_EF_3.1.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore\">environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#impacts\">impacts</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#name\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#name\">name</a> containing &quot;PEF indicators only&quot;</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><p>Normalisation factors in PEF v3.1 are calculated using a Global population number of 6,895,889,018:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/characterisedIndicator.csv\">characterisedIndicator.csv</a> -&gt; <code>pefTerm-normalisation-v3_1</code>; <code>pefTerm-weighing-v3_1</code>; <code>pefTerm-methodModel-whiteList-v3-1</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Frischknecht et al (2000)"],"citation":["[Frischknecht, R., Braunschweig, A., Hofstetter, P., & Suter, P. (2000). Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental impact assessment Review, 20(2), 159-189.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925599000426)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)\n\nThis model calculates the [Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)](/term/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Ionising radiation, human health\" measured in `kBq U-235 equivalent`.\n\n> Impact of exposure to ionising radiations on human health\n\nIonising radiation, human health – EF impact category that accounts for the adverse health effects on human health caused by radioactive releases.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Ionising radiation, human health\n\n> The exposure to ionising radiation(radioactivity) can have impacts on human health.\n> The Environmental Footprint only considers emissions under normal operating conditions (no accidents in nuclear plants are considered).\n> The potential impact on human health of different ionising radiations is converted to the equivalent of kilobequerels of Uranium 235 (kg U235 eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                   | Model selected for use by the JRC                                             | originally based on                                                                                                | Robustness score* |\n|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Frischknecht et al (2000)](/term/frischknechtEtAl2000) | [Human health effect model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Frischknecht et al, 2000 (as developed by Dreicer et al. 1995)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for ionising radiation is not changed\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> Proxy CFs have been adopted for some emissions to specific sub-compartments, the reference unit was adapted from kg to kBq, according to ILCD unit group for radioactivity\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/frischknechtEtAl2000/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq/frischknechtetal2000.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Frischknecht et al (2000)"],"citation":["[Frischknecht, R., Braunschweig, A., Hofstetter, P., & Suter, P. (2000). Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental impact assessment Review, 20(2), 159-189.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925599000426)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq"],"modelRequires":["ionisingCompoundsToAirInputsProduction","ionisingCompoundsToWaterInputsProduction","ionisingCompoundsToSaltwaterInputsProduction"]},"content":"# Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)\n\nThis model calculates the [Ionising radiation (kBq U-235 eq)](/term/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Ionising radiation, human health\" measured in `kBq U-235 equivalent`.\n\n> Impact of exposure to ionising radiations on human health\n\nIonising radiation, human health – EF impact category that accounts for the adverse health effects on human health caused by radioactive releases.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Ionising radiation, human health\n\n> The exposure to ionising radiation(radioactivity) can have impacts on human health.\n> The Environmental Footprint only considers emissions under normal operating conditions (no accidents in nuclear plants are considered).\n> The potential impact on human health of different ionising radiations is converted to the equivalent of kilobequerels of Uranium 235 (kg U235 eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                   | Model selected for use by the JRC                                             | originally based on                                                                                                | Robustness score* |\n|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Frischknecht et al (2000)](/term/frischknechtEtAl2000) | [Human health effect model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Frischknecht et al, 2000 (as developed by Dreicer et al. 1995)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for ionising radiation is not changed\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> Proxy CFs have been adopted for some emissions to specific sub-compartments, the reference unit was adapted from kg to kBq, according to ILCD unit group for radioactivity\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/frischknechtEtAl2000/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicators</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq\">ionisingRadiationKbqU235Eq</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/frischknechtEtAl2000\">frischknechtEtAl2000</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#key\">key</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#inputs\">inputs</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ionisingCompoundsToAirInputsProduction\">ionisingCompoundsToAirInputsProduction</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ionisingCompoundsToWaterInputsProduction\">ionisingCompoundsToWaterInputsProduction</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ionisingCompoundsToSaltwaterInputsProduction\">ionisingCompoundsToSaltwaterInputsProduction</a> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#key\">key</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=waste\">waste</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#units\">units</a> = <code>kg</code></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/waste.csv\">waste.csv</a> -&gt; <code>ionisingCompoundsToAirInputsProduction</code>; <code>ionisingCompoundsToWaterInputsProduction</code>; <code>ionisingCompoundsToSaltwaterInputsProduction</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Valentina Caldart"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["LOTOS-EUROS model"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Photochemical ozone creation potential, human health (NMVOC eq)\n\nThis model calculates the [Photochemical ozone formation, human health](/term/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Photochemical ozone formation, human health\" measured in `kg of NMVOC equivalent`.\n\n> Potential of harmful tropospheric ozone formation (\"summer smog\") from air emissions\n\nPhotochemical ozone formation – EF impact category that accounts for the formation of ozone at the ground level of the troposphere caused by photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO) in the presence of nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) and sunlight.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Photochemical ozone formation, human health\n\n> Ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) on the ground (in the troposphere) is harmful: it attacks organic compounds in animals and plants, it increases the frequency of respiratory problems when photochemical smog (“summer smog”) is present in cities.\n> The potential impact of substances contributing to photochemical ozone formation is converted into the equivalent of kilograms of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (e.g. alcohols, aromatics, etc.; kg NMVOC eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                  | Model selected for use by the JRC                                     | originally based on                                                                                  | Robustness score* |\n|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist) | [LOTOS-EUROS model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Van Zelm et al., 2008, as applied in ReCiPe 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for Photochemical Ozone Formation is not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, but contained in the elementary flow list, both for ILCD and EF, have been calculated (see below further details).\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [cycle.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/recipe2016Hierarchist/humanDamageOzoneFormation/cycle.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)~\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)~\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)~\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)~\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq/lotosEuroSmodel.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Valentina Caldart"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["LOTOS-EUROS model"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq"]},"content":"# Photochemical ozone creation potential, human health (NMVOC eq)\n\nThis model calculates the [Photochemical ozone formation, human health](/term/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Photochemical ozone formation, human health\" measured in `kg of NMVOC equivalent`.\n\n> Potential of harmful tropospheric ozone formation (\"summer smog\") from air emissions\n\nPhotochemical ozone formation – EF impact category that accounts for the formation of ozone at the ground level of the troposphere caused by photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO) in the presence of nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) and sunlight.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Photochemical ozone formation, human health\n\n> Ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) on the ground (in the troposphere) is harmful: it attacks organic compounds in animals and plants, it increases the frequency of respiratory problems when photochemical smog (“summer smog”) is present in cities.\n> The potential impact of substances contributing to photochemical ozone formation is converted into the equivalent of kilograms of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (e.g. alcohols, aromatics, etc.; kg NMVOC eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                  | Model selected for use by the JRC                                     | originally based on                                                                                  | Robustness score* |\n|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist](/term/recipe2016Hierarchist) | [LOTOS-EUROS model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Van Zelm et al., 2008, as applied in ReCiPe 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for Photochemical Ozone Formation is not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, but contained in the elementary flow list, both for ILCD and EF, have been calculated (see below further details).\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [cycle.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/recipe2016Hierarchist/humanDamageOzoneFormation/cycle.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)~\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)~\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)~\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)~\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq\">photochemicalOzoneCreationPotentialHumanHealthNmvocEq</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=emission\">emission</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/emission.csv\">emission.csv</a> -&gt; <code>nmvocEqPhotochemicalOzoneFormationEnvironmentalFootprintV3-1</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, land occupation\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, land occupation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land use - Occupation\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Land use – EF impact category related to use (occupation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand occupation considers the effects of the land use, the amount of area involved and the duration of its occupation (changes in quality multiplied by area and duration).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land use - Occupation\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation/plantationForest/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation/environmentalFootprintv31.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["soilQualityIndexLandOccupation"],"modelRequires":["landOccupationInputsProduction","landOccupationDuringCycle"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, land occupation\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, land occupation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land use - Occupation\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Land use – EF impact category related to use (occupation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand occupation considers the effects of the land use, the amount of area involved and the duration of its occupation (changes in quality multiplied by area and duration).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land use - Occupation\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation/plantationForest/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation\">soilQualityIndexLandOccupation</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>optional:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#country\">country</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> <code>&gt;=0</code> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/landOccupationInputsProduction\">landOccupationInputsProduction</a> <strong>or</strong> <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/landOccupationDuringCycle\">landOccupationDuringCycle</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#units\">units</a> = <code>m2*year</code> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#landCover\">landCover</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=landCover\">landCover</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><p>Performs lookup on landCover.csv for column headers and region-pefTermGrouping-landOccupation.csv for CFs:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/region-pefTermGrouping-landOccupation.csv\">region-pefTermGrouping-landOccupation.csv</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/landCover.csv\">landCover.csv</a> -&gt; <code>pefTermGrouping</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, land transformation\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, land transformation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land use - Transformation\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Land use – EF impact category related to conversion (transformation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand transformation considers the extent of changes in land properties and the area affected (changes in quality multiplied by the area)\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land use - Transformation\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation/Italy/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation/environmentalFootprintv31.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["soilQualityIndexLandTransformation"],"modelRequires":["landTransformation20YearAverageDuringCycle","landTransformation20YearAverageInputsProduction"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, land transformation\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, land transformation](/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land use - Transformation\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Land use – EF impact category related to conversion (transformation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand transformation considers the extent of changes in land properties and the area affected (changes in quality multiplied by the area)\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land use - Transformation\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation/Italy/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation\">soilQualityIndexLandTransformation</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=resourceUse\">resourceUse</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/landTransformation20YearAverageDuringCycle\">landTransformation20YearAverageDuringCycle</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> <code>&gt;= 0</code> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#landCover\">landCover</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=landCover\">landCover</a> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#previousLandCover\">previousLandCover</a> with:</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=landCover\">landCover</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>optional:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#country\">country</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=resourceUse\">resourceUse</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/landTransformation20YearAverageInputsProduction\">landTransformation20YearAverageInputsProduction</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> <code>&gt;= 0</code> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#landCover\">landCover</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=landCover\">landCover</a> and a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#previousLandCover\">previousLandCover</a> with:</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=landCover\">landCover</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/region-pefTermGrouping-landTransformation-from.csv\">region-pefTermGrouping-landTransformation-from.csv</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/region-pefTermGrouping-landTransformation-to.csv\">region-pefTermGrouping-landTransformation-to.csv</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/landCover.csv\">landCover.csv</a> -&gt; <code>pefTermGrouping</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, total land use effects\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, total land use effects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land Use\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Transformation and use of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impact can include loss of species, organic matter, soil, filtration capacity, permeability\n\nLand use – EF impact category related to use (occupation) and conversion (transformation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand occupation considers the effects of the land use, the amount of area involved and the duration of its occupation (changes in soil quality multiplied by area and duration).\nLand transformation considers the extent of changes in land properties and the area affected (changes in soil quality multiplied by the area).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land Use\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### How the score is calculated\n\nThis model aggregates multiple land occupation and land transformation indicators in an Impact Assessment and returns a single score as a [soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects) indicator.\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects/impactassessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects/environmentalFootprintv31.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects"],"modelRequires":["soilQualityIndexLandOccupation","soilQualityIndexLandTransformation"]},"content":"# Soil quality index, total land use effects\n\nThis model calculates the [Soil quality index, total land use effects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Land Use\" measured in `Dimensionless – pt`.\n\n> Transformation and use of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impact can include loss of species, organic matter, soil, filtration capacity, permeability\n\nLand use – EF impact category related to use (occupation) and conversion (transformation) of land area by activities such as agriculture, forestry, roads, housing, mining, etc.\n\nLand occupation considers the effects of the land use, the amount of area involved and the duration of its occupation (changes in soil quality multiplied by area and duration).\nLand transformation considers the extent of changes in land properties and the area affected (changes in soil quality multiplied by the area).\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Land Use\n\n> Use and transformation of land for agriculture, roads, housing, mining or other purposes.\n> The impacts can vary and include loss of species, of the organic matter content of soil, or loss of the soil itself (erosion).\n> This is a composite indicator measuring impacts on four soil properties (biotic production, erosion resistance, groundwater regeneration and mechanical filtration), expressed in points (Pts).\n\n### How the score is calculated\n\nThis model aggregates multiple land occupation and land transformation indicators in an Impact Assessment and returns a single score as a [soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects](/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects) indicator.\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                     | originally based on                                                                                                                                                                       | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [Soil quality index based on LANCA](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Soil quality index based on an updated LANCA model (De Laurentiis et al. 2019) and on the LANCA CF version 2.5 (Horn and Meier, 2018)](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `III`             |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The model for land use impact assessment is changed.\n> In ILCD the model assessing Soil Organic Matter (SOM) loss, developed by Mila I Canals (2007) was adopted, in EF the method, a soil quality index built aggregating the indicators provided by the LANCA model (Bos et al, 2016) is implemented.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> The LANCA model is taking into account different indicators for a number of soil properties, as explained below.\n> Tthose indicators have been pooled and re-scaled, in order to obtain a dimensionless soil quality index, accounting for the different properties evaluated by the model.\n> The model assigns both global and spatially differentiated CFs at country level.\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects/impactassessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects\">soilQualityIndexTotalLandUseEffects</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodTier\">methodTier</a> with <code>tier 1</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#statsDefinition\">statsDefinition</a> with <code>modelled</code></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#impacts\">impacts</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/soilQualityIndexLandOccupation\">soilQualityIndexLandOccupation</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/soilQualityIndexLandTransformation\">soilQualityIndexLandTransformation</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Posch et al (2008)"],"citation":["[Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J. P., Johansson, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6), 477-486.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance\n\nThis model calculates the [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Acidification Accumulated Exceedance – AE\" measured in \"mol of H<sup>+</sup> equivalent\".\n\n> Acidification from air, water, and soil emissions (primarily sulfur compounds) mainly due to combustion processes in electricity generation, heating, and transport\n\nAcidification – EF impact category that addresses impacts due to acidifying substances in the environment. Emissions of NO<sub>x</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> lead to releases of hydrogen ions (H<sup>+</sup>) when the gases are mineralised. The protons contribute to the acidification of soils and water when they are released in areas where the buffering capacity is low, resulting in forest decline and lake acidification.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Acidification Accumulated Exceedance – AE\n\n> NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> lead to releases of hydrogen ions (H<sup>+</sup>) when the gases are mineralised.\n> The protons contribute to the acidification of soils and water when they are released in areas where the buffering capacity is low,  resulting in forest decline and lake acidification.\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                | originally based on                                                                          | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008) | [Accumulated Exceedance model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Seppala et al., 2006; Posch et al., 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for Acidification is not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, but contained in the elementary flow list, both for ILCD and EF, have been calculated. For the most representative flows in the specific category, country-specific CFs have been calculated.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Examples\n\n####  Ammonia\n\nTo find out how much 1 kg of [Ammonia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonia) (NH<sub>3</sub>) emitted to air contributes to acidification, when creating a [Product](/schema/ImpactAssessment#product), we use an Indicator with the term [nh3ToAirInputsProduction](/term/nh3ToAirInputsProduction) inside the [emissionsResourceUse](/schema/ImpactAssessment#resourceUse) list, inside a [Impact Assessment](/schema/ImpactAssessment).\n\n##### Sample input:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"id\": \"my-test-impact\",\n  \"type\": \"ImpactAssessment\",\n  \"emissionsResourceUse\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Indicator\",\n      \"term\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Term\",\n        \"@id\": \"nh3ToAirInputsProduction\"\n      },\n      \"value\": 1\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n##### Sample output:\n\nThe model will output a [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) mid-point Characterised Indicators with value: `0.085` in units of \"mol H<sup>+</sup> eq\".\n\n```json\n\n{\n  \"@type\": \"Indicator\",\n  \"methodModel\": {\n    \"@id\": \"poschEtAl2008\",\n    \"@type\": \"Term\"\n  },\n  \"term\": {\n    \"@id\": \"terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance\",\n    \"@type\": \"Term\"\n  },\n  \"value\": 0.085\n}\n\n```\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/poschEtAl2008/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/poschetal2008.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Posch et al (2008)"],"citation":["[Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J. P., Johansson, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6), 477-486.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance"]},"content":"# Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance\n\nThis model calculates the [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Acidification Accumulated Exceedance – AE\" measured in \"mol of H<sup>+</sup> equivalent\".\n\n> Acidification from air, water, and soil emissions (primarily sulfur compounds) mainly due to combustion processes in electricity generation, heating, and transport\n\nAcidification – EF impact category that addresses impacts due to acidifying substances in the environment. Emissions of NO<sub>x</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> lead to releases of hydrogen ions (H<sup>+</sup>) when the gases are mineralised. The protons contribute to the acidification of soils and water when they are released in areas where the buffering capacity is low, resulting in forest decline and lake acidification.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Acidification Accumulated Exceedance – AE\n\n> NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>x</sub> lead to releases of hydrogen ions (H<sup>+</sup>) when the gases are mineralised.\n> The protons contribute to the acidification of soils and water when they are released in areas where the buffering capacity is low,  resulting in forest decline and lake acidification.\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                | originally based on                                                                          | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008) | [Accumulated Exceedance model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Seppala et al., 2006; Posch et al., 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The method adopted in ILCD for Acidification is not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, but contained in the elementary flow list, both for ILCD and EF, have been calculated. For the most representative flows in the specific category, country-specific CFs have been calculated.\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Examples\n\n####  Ammonia\n\nTo find out how much 1 kg of [Ammonia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonia) (NH<sub>3</sub>) emitted to air contributes to acidification, when creating a [Product](/schema/ImpactAssessment#product), we use an Indicator with the term [nh3ToAirInputsProduction](/term/nh3ToAirInputsProduction) inside the [emissionsResourceUse](/schema/ImpactAssessment#resourceUse) list, inside a [Impact Assessment](/schema/ImpactAssessment).\n\n##### Sample input:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"id\": \"my-test-impact\",\n  \"type\": \"ImpactAssessment\",\n  \"emissionsResourceUse\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Indicator\",\n      \"term\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Term\",\n        \"@id\": \"nh3ToAirInputsProduction\"\n      },\n      \"value\": 1\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n##### Sample output:\n\nThe model will output a [Terrestrial acidification potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) mid-point Characterised Indicators with value: `0.085` in units of \"mol H<sup>+</sup> eq\".\n\n```json\n\n{\n  \"@type\": \"Indicator\",\n  \"methodModel\": {\n    \"@id\": \"poschEtAl2008\",\n    \"@type\": \"Term\"\n  },\n  \"term\": {\n    \"@id\": \"terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance\",\n    \"@type\": \"Term\"\n  },\n  \"value\": 0.085\n}\n\n```\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/poschEtAl2008/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance\">terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/poschEtAl2008\">poschEtAl2008</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>either:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#country\">country</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#site\">site</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Site#region\">region</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=emission\">emission</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/region-emission-terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance.csv\">region-emission-terrestrialAcidificationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance.csv</a></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/content.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Posch et al (2008)"],"citation":["[Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J. P., Johansson, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6), 477-486.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"]},"content":"# Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance\n\nThis model calculates the [Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Terrestrial eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance – AE\" measured in `mol of N equivalent`.\n\n> Eutrophication and potential impact on ecosystems caused by nitrogen and phosphorous emissions mainly due to fertilizers, combustion, sewage systems\n\nEutrophication – EF impact category related to nutrients (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus) from sewage outfalls and fertilised farmland that accelerate the growth of algae and other vegetation in water.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Terrestrial eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance – AE\n\n> Eutrophication arises when substances containing nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) are released to ecosystems.\n> These nutrients cause a growth of algae or specific plants and thus limit growth in the original ecosystem.\n> The potential impact of substances contributing to terrestrial eutrophication is converted to the equivalent of moles of nitrogen (mol N eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                | originally based on                                                                          | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008) | [Accumulated Exceedance model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Seppala et al., 2006; Posch et al., 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The methods adopted in ILCD for Eutrophication are not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, have been calculated. \n> For terrestrial eutrophication, country-specific CFs have been calculated for ammonia, nitrogen oxides and nitrogen dioxide.\n> See below for additional details\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/poschEtAl2008/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/environmentalFootprintv31/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/poschetal2008.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"contributor":["Guillaume Royer"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"subgroup":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"tab":["Posch et al (2008)"],"citation":["[Posch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J. P., Johansson, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6), 477-486.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9)","[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)"],"modelId":["terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance"]},"content":"# Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance\n\nThis model calculates the [Terrestrial eutrophication potential, accumulated exceedance](/term/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Terrestrial eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance – AE\" measured in `mol of N equivalent`.\n\n> Eutrophication and potential impact on ecosystems caused by nitrogen and phosphorous emissions mainly due to fertilizers, combustion, sewage systems\n\nEutrophication – EF impact category related to nutrients (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus) from sewage outfalls and fertilised farmland that accelerate the growth of algae and other vegetation in water.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Terrestrial eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance – AE\n\n> Eutrophication arises when substances containing nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) are released to ecosystems.\n> These nutrients cause a growth of algae or specific plants and thus limit growth in the original ecosystem.\n> The potential impact of substances contributing to terrestrial eutrophication is converted to the equivalent of moles of nitrogen (mol N eq).\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                     | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                | originally based on                                                                          | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Posch et al (2008)](/term/poschEtAl2008) | [Accumulated Exceedance model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Seppala et al., 2006; Posch et al., 2008](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II`              |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The methods adopted in ILCD for Eutrophication are not changed.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> CFs for specific flows, not available in the original method, have been calculated. \n> For terrestrial eutrophication, country-specific CFs have been calculated for ammonia, nitrogen oxides and nitrogen dioxide.\n> See below for additional details\n\n### The HESTIA implementation\n\n- This model uses different characterisation factors depending on the [Country](/schema/ImpactAssessment#country) / [Region](/schema/Site#region)\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/poschEtAl2008/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance\">terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/poschEtAl2008\">poschEtAl2008</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>either:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#country\">country</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#site\">site</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Site#region\">region</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=region\">region</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=emission\">emission</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/region-emission-terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance.csv\">region-emission-terrestrialEutrophicationPotentialAccumulatedExceedance.csv</a></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue/environmentalFootprintv31.json

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"modelId":["freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue"],"modelRequires":["pesticideVeterinaryDrug"]},"content":"# Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (CTUe)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue\">freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#cycle\">cycle</a> with:<ul>\n<li>Data completeness assessment for pesticideVeterinaryDrug: <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Completeness#pesticideVeterinaryDrug\">completeness.pesticideVeterinaryDrug</a> must be <code>True</code> and a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Cycle#inputs\">inputs</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Input#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Input#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=pesticideAI\">pesticideAI</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/pesticideAI.csv\">pesticideAI.csv</a> -&gt; <code>pafM3DFreshwaterEcotoxicityUsetox2-1Hc20Ec10eq</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}
+{"tags":{"author":["Lloyd Ashby"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"tab":["Environmental Footprint v3.1"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)","[Saouter, E., Biganzoli, F., Ceriani, L., Versteeg, D., Crenna, E., Zampori, L., ... & Pant, R. (2020). Environmental footprint: update of life cycle impact assessment methods-ecotoxicity freshwater, human toxicity cancer, and non-cancer. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Erwan-Saouter-2/publication/330398136_Environmental_Footprint_Update_of_Life_Cycle_Impact_Assessment_Methods-Ecotoxicity_freshwater_human_toxicity_cancer_and_non-cancer/links/5c3dfba0a6fdccd6b5aeed07/Environmental-Footprint-Update-of-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-Methods-Ecotoxicity-freshwater-human-toxicity-cancer-and-non-cancer.pdf)"],"modelId":["freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue"],"modelRequires":["pesticideVeterinaryDrug"]},"content":"# Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (CTUe)\n\nThis model calculates the [Freshwater ecotoxicity potential (CTUe)](/term/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Ecotoxicity, freshwater\" measured in `CTUe`.\n\n> Impact of toxic substances on freshwater ecosystems\n\nEcotoxicity, freshwater – EF impact category that addresses the toxic impacts on an ecosystem, which damage individual species and change the structure and function of the ecosystem.\nEcotoxicity is a result of a variety of different toxicological mechanisms caused by the release of substances with a direct effect on the health of the ecosystem.\n\n### Part of the EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Ecotoxicity, freshwater\n\n> This indicator refers to potential toxic impacts on an ecosystem, which may damage individual species as well as the functioning of the ecosystem.\n> Some substances have a tendency to accumulate in living organisms.\n> The unit of measurement is Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (CTUe).\n> This is based on a model called USEtox\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation                                            | Model selected for use by the JRC                                | originally based on                                                                                                                   | Robustness score* |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [Environmental Footprint v3.1](/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1) | [USEtox model](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [based on USEtox2.1 model (Fantke et al. 2017), adapted as in Saouter et al., 2018](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `II/III`          |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf):\n- Level I: recommended and satisfactory;\n- Level II: recommended but in need of some improvements;\n- Level III: recommended, but to be applied with caution.\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> The most recent version of the USEtox® model (2.1) has been used.\n> Overall, CFs have been provided for more than 6700 substances.\n> The list of chemicals has been enlarged: new added chemicals’ CF have been calculated on the basis of data collected from REACH-IUCLID database, EFSA’s OpenFoodTox database and PPDB database.\n> Last, for data gap filling purposes, EPISuite and OECD QSAR toolbox have been investigated.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> For Ecotoxicity the Effect Factor is derived from log(HC20) instead from avlogEC50, in order to be in line with the most recent recommendations from UNEP – Pellston Workshop 2018. As consequence, the Effect Factor is calculated as follows: EF = 0.2/HC20.\n> USEtox® 2.1 model has been run for organics, inorganics and metals.\n> However, being USEtox® built only for organic chemicals, some factors have been applied for cover uncertainty associated to inorganics and metals\n> Specific rules have been adopted, already in ILCD scheme, for metals.\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](/schema/): [cycle.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/environmentalFootprintV3_1/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue/cycle.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue\">freshwaterEcotoxicityPotentialCtue</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/environmentalFootprintV3-1\">environmentalFootprintV3-1</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#cycle\">cycle</a> with:<ul>\n<li>Data completeness assessment for pesticideVeterinaryDrug: <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Completeness#pesticideVeterinaryDrug\">completeness.pesticideVeterinaryDrug</a> must be <code>True</code> and a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Cycle#inputs\">inputs</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Input#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Input#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=pesticideAI\">pesticideAI</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/pesticideAI.csv\">pesticideAI.csv</a> -&gt; <code>pafM3DFreshwaterEcotoxicityUsetox2-1Hc20Ec10eq</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}

package/dist/content/models/impactAssessmentImpacts/gwp100/ipcc2021.json

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"tags":{"author":["Guillaume Royer"],"contributor":["Joseph Poore"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"tab":["IPCC (2021)"],"modelId":["gwp100"]},"content":"# GWP100\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/gwp100\">gwp100</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ipcc2021\">ipcc2021</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=emission\">emission</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/emission.csv\">emission.csv</a> -&gt; <code>co2EqGwp100Ipcc2021</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}
+{"tags":{"author":["Guillaume Royer"],"contributor":["Joseph Poore"],"group":["Impact Assessment: Impacts"],"tab":["IPCC (2021)"],"citation":["[Damiani, M., Ferrara, N., & Ardente, F. (2022). Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods.](https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/c43b9684-4521-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1)","[Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., ... & Zhou, B. (2021). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2(1), 2391.](https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896)"],"modelId":["gwp100"]},"content":"# Global warming potential (GWP100)\n\nThis model calculates the [The global warming potential (100 years)](/term/gwp100) Characterised Indicator for impact category \"Climate change - GWP100\" measured in \"kg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent\".\n\n> Increase in the average global temperature resulting from greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)\n\nClimate change – EF impact category considering all inputs and outputs that result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The consequences include increased average global temperatures and sudden regional climatic changes.\n\n### Part of the The EU Product Environmental Footprint\n\n[See documentation here](/guide/environmentalFootprintV3-1-environmentalFootprintSingleOverallScore)\n\n### Environmental Impact Categories - Climate change - GWP100\n\n> This indicator refers to the increase in the average global temperatures as result of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.\n> The greatest contributor is generally the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas.\n> The global warming potential of all GHG emissions is measured in kilogram of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq), namely all GHG are compared to the amount of the global warming potential of 1 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>.\n\n### Origins of this Environmental Footprint model\n\n| HESTIA implementation         | Model selected for use by the JRC                                                                                             | originally based on                                                                                         | Robustness score* |\n|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| [IPCC (2021)](/term/ipcc2021) | [Bern model - Global Warming Potentials (GWP) over a 100 year time horizon](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | [Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2013](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EFVersioning.html) | `I`               |\n\n*According to [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf) :\n\"Level I\" (recommended and satisfactory)\n\"Level II\" (recommended but in need of some improvements)\n\"Level III\" (recommended, but to be applied with caution)\n\n### Additional supporting information for this impact category\nChanges from ILCD to EF 3.0:\n\n> What’s new respect to ILCD:\n> the reference method for climate change, midpoint, in ILCD was the one proposed by IPCC 2007, while in the EF method IPCC 2013 is adopted.\n> Furthermore, the values adopted for the Global Warming Potentials with time horizon 100 years (GWP-100) includes the carbon feedbacks for different substances, while the GWP-100 adopted in ILCD was accounting only the effect of single substances.\n> Several new substances have been characterised in the new method, compared to ILCD.\n> Beyond the main method containing all the characterised substances in this category, three sub-methods for fossil, biogenic and land use emissions are available in EF 3.0.\n\n> Deviations or adaptations from the original method:\n> Some values have been adapted according to the PEFCR guidance document 6.2 (see table and ref. below).\n\n### Full example file\n\nIn the [HESTIA Schema](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-schema/): [impact-assessment.jsonld](https://gitlab.com/hestia-earth/hestia-engine-models/-/raw/master/tests/fixtures/impact_assessment/emissions/impact-assessment.jsonld?ref_type=heads)\n\n### References:\n- [ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf 2.2 Recommendation levels](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD-Handbook-Recommendations-for-Life-Cycle-Impact-Assessment-in-the-European-context.pdf)~\n- [Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods > Page 17](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/TR_SupportingCF_FINAL.pdf)\n- [Life Cycle Assessment & the EF methods - Comprehensive coverage of impacts](https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/environmental-footprint-methods/life-cycle-assessment-ef-methods_en)\n- [eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu EF-v3.1 Excel file](https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/EF3_1/EF-LCIAMethod_CF%28EF-v3.1%29.xlsx)\n- [IPCC (2021)](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"collapsibles\">\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Returns</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator\">Indicator</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/gwp100\">gwp100</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#methodModel\">methodModel</a> with <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/term/ipcc2021\">ipcc2021</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Requirements</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li>A <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment\">ImpactAssessment</a> with:<ul>\n<li>a list of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/ImpactAssessment#emissionsResourceUse\">emissionsResourceUses</a> with:<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#value\">value</a> and <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Indicator#term\">term</a> of <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/schema/Term#termType\">termType</a> = <a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary?termType=emission\">emission</a></li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  <div class=\"collapsible-group\">\n    <div class=\"collapsible-header\">\n      <span>Lookups used</span>\n    </div>\n    <div class=\"collapsible-content\"><ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://hestia.earth/glossary/lookups/emission.csv\">emission.csv</a> -&gt; <code>co2EqGwp100Ipcc2021</code></li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n  </div>\n  \n</div>"}