@hanzlaa/rcode 3.6.15 → 4.0.0

package/rcode/workflows/plan-milestone.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<purpose>
+Plan all phases in a milestone using parallel dependency-wave execution. Closes #732.
+Groups independent phases into waves, spawns rcode-planner agents concurrently per wave, and verifies each SPRINT.md with rcode-sprint-checker before advancing.
+</purpose>
+
+<required_reading>
+@.rcode/references/output-format.md
+@.rcode/references/revision-loop.md
+Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
+</required_reading>
+
+## 1. Parse arguments and load context
+
+Parse `$ARGUMENTS`:
+- `--milestone <name>` — filter to a named milestone (optional)
+- `--dry-run` — show wave plan without spawning agents
+- `--skip-research` — skip rcode-phase-researcher for all phases
+- `--wave <N>` — start from wave N (resume after partial failure)
+
+```bash
+INIT_JSON=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" state read 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
+ROADMAP_PHASES=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" roadmap list-phases 2>/dev/null || echo '[]')
+```
+
+## 2. Build dependency wave graph
+
+Read ROADMAP.md. For each planned phase:
+1. Extract its `**Dependencies:**` line (if present) — list of phase numbers it depends on.
+2. Phases with no dependencies → Wave 1.
+3. Phases whose all dependencies are in Wave N → Wave N+1.
+4. Repeat until all phases are assigned.
+
+**Display wave plan:**
+```
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+ rcode ► PLAN MILESTONE: {MILESTONE_NAME}
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+Wave 1 (parallel): Phase {N1}, Phase {N2}
+Wave 2 (parallel): Phase {N3}
+Wave 3 (serial):   Phase {N4}  ← depends on N3
+```
+
+If `--dry-run`: print the plan and exit.
+
+## 3. Execute waves sequentially, phases in parallel
+
+For each wave:
+
+**3a. Spawn rcode-planner agents in parallel (one per phase in wave):**
+
+Use `run_in_background: true` for each Agent dispatch. Wait for all to complete before next wave.
+
+```
+◆ Wave {N}: planning {count} phase(s) in parallel...
+  - Phase {N1}: {name}
+  - Phase {N2}: {name}
+```
+
+Each planner agent receives:
+- Phase number, name, goal from ROADMAP
+- `--skip-research` if flag is set
+- Research from RESEARCH.md if it exists
+
+**3b. Verify each SPRINT.md with rcode-sprint-checker:**
+
+After all planners in the wave complete, spawn rcode-sprint-checker for each SPRINT.md (in parallel, same run_in_background pattern). Collect CHECK.md results.
+
+On `FAIL` for any phase:
+```
+⚠ Phase {N} sprint-checker FAIL — entering revision loop (max 2 iterations)
+```
+Spawn a revision planner with checker feedback. Max 2 revision rounds per phase.
+
+**3c. Advance to next wave:**
+
+Only advance when all phases in the current wave have a passing CHECK.md.
+
+## 4. Completion summary
+
+```
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+ rcode ► MILESTONE PLANNED ✓  {MILESTONE_NAME}
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+Waves: {N}
+Phases planned: {M}
+SPRINT.md files created: {M}
+
+Next step: /rcode-execute-milestone
+```
+
+## Output Format
+
+Open with wave-plan banner (step 2). Per-phase progress indicators. Closure banner (step 4).
+
+## Examples
+
+**Happy path:** `/rcode-plan-milestone` → plans all pending phases in parallel dependency waves.
+
+**Skip research:** `/rcode-plan-milestone --skip-research` → faster, uses CONTEXT.md if available.
+
+**Resume:** `/rcode-plan-milestone --wave 2` → skip wave 1 (already planned), start from wave 2.
+
+**Dry run:** `/rcode-plan-milestone --dry-run` → print wave assignment, exit.
+
+## Next Up
+
+- `/rcode-execute-milestone` — execute all planned phases in dependency order
+- `/rcode-autonomous` — drive the milestone autonomously after planning

package/rcode/workflows/plan-prd-express.md

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+<purpose>
+Sub-step of plan.md — Step 3.5 PRD Express Path. Handles the --prd flag: parses a PRD document and auto-generates CONTEXT.md from it, bypassing manual discussion.
+</purpose>
+
+## 3.5. Handle PRD Express Path
+
+**Skip if:** No `--prd` flag in arguments.
+
+**If `--prd <filepath>` provided:**
+
+1. Read the PRD file:
+```bash
+PRD_CONTENT=$(cat "$PRD_FILE" 2>/dev/null)
+if [ -z "$PRD_CONTENT" ]; then
+  echo "Error: PRD file not found: $PRD_FILE"
+  exit 1
+fi
+```
+
+2. Display banner:
+```
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+ rcode ► PRD EXPRESS PATH
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+Using PRD: {PRD_FILE}
+Generating CONTEXT.md from requirements...
+```
+
+3. Parse the PRD content and generate CONTEXT.md. The orchestrator should:
+   - Extract all requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria, and constraints from the PRD
+   - Map each to a locked decision (everything in the PRD is treated as a locked decision)
+   - Identify any areas the PRD doesn't cover and mark as "Claude's Discretion"
+   - **Extract canonical refs** from ROADMAP.md for this phase, plus any specs/ADRs referenced in the PRD — expand to full file paths (MANDATORY)
+   - Create CONTEXT.md in the phase directory
+
+4. Write CONTEXT.md:
+```markdown
+# Phase [X]: [Name] - Context
+
+**Gathered:** [date]
+**Status:** Ready for planning
+**Source:** PRD Express Path ({PRD_FILE})
+
+<domain>
+## Phase Boundary
+
+[Extracted from PRD — what this phase delivers]
+
+</domain>
+
+<decisions>
+## Implementation Decisions
+
+{For each requirement/story/criterion in the PRD:}
+### [Category derived from content]
+- [Requirement as locked decision]
+
+### Claude's Discretion
+[Areas not covered by PRD — implementation details, technical choices]
+
+</decisions>
+
+<canonical_refs>
+## Canonical References
+
+**Downstream agents MUST read these before planning or implementing.**
+
+[MANDATORY. Extract from ROADMAP.md and any docs referenced in the PRD.
+Use full relative paths. Group by topic area.]
+
+### [Topic area]
+- `path/to/spec-or-adr.md` — [What it decides/defines]
+
+[If no external specs: "No external specs — requirements fully captured in decisions above"]
+
+</canonical_refs>
+
+<specifics>
+## Specific Ideas
+
+[Any specific references, examples, or concrete requirements from PRD]
+
+</specifics>
+
+<deferred>
+## Deferred Ideas
+
+[Items in PRD explicitly marked as future/v2/out-of-scope]
+[If none: "None — PRD covers phase scope"]
+
+</deferred>
+
+---
+
+*Phase: XX-name*
+*Context gathered: [date] via PRD Express Path*
+```
+
+5. Commit:
+```bash
+node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" commit "docs(${padded_phase}): generate context from PRD" --files "${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-CONTEXT.md"
+```
+
+6. Set `context_content` to the generated CONTEXT.md content and continue to step 5 (Handle Research).
+
+**Effect:** This completely bypasses step 4 (Load CONTEXT.md) since we just created it. The rest of the workflow (research, planning, verification) proceeds normally with the PRD-derived context.
+
+
+## Next Up
+
+- `/rcode-plan` — continue with the rest of the planning workflow
+- `/rcode-execute` — execute once the plan is generated

package/rcode/workflows/plan-research-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+<purpose>
+Sub-steps of plan.md — Steps 5 through 5.7. Handles research, validation architecture, security threat model gate, UI design contract gate, and schema push detection.
+</purpose>
+
+## 5. Handle Research
+
+**Skip if:** `--gaps` flag or `--skip-research` flag or `--reviews` flag.
+
+**If `has_research` is true (from init) AND no `--research` flag:** Use existing, skip to step 6.
+
+**If RESEARCH.md missing AND `has_context` is true AND no `--research` flag:** Skip research silently and proceed to step 6. CONTEXT.md already captures the user's design decisions — re-researching adds tokens without new signal. Display: `Research skipped — CONTEXT.md found (use --research to force)`. This closes #588.
+
+**If RESEARCH.md missing OR `--research` flag:**
+
+**If no explicit flag (`--research` or `--skip-research`) and not `--auto`:**
+Ask the user whether to research, with a contextual recommendation based on the phase:
+
+If `TEXT_MODE` is true, present as a plain-text numbered list:
+```
+Research before planning Phase {X}: {phase_name}?
+
+1. Research first (Recommended) — Investigate domain, patterns, and dependencies before planning. Best for new features, unfamiliar integrations, or architectural changes.
+2. Skip research — Plan directly from context and requirements. Best for bug fixes, simple refactors, or well-understood tasks.
+
+Enter number:
+```
+
+Otherwise use AskUserQuestion:
+```
+AskUserQuestion([
+  {
+    question: "Research before planning Phase {X}: {phase_name}?",
+    header: "Research",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "Research first (Recommended)", description: "Investigate domain, patterns, and dependencies before planning. Best for new features, unfamiliar integrations, or architectural changes." },
+      { label: "Skip research", description: "Plan directly from context and requirements. Best for bug fixes, simple refactors, or well-understood tasks." }
+    ]
+  }
+])
+```
+
+If user selects "Skip research": skip to step 6.
+
+**If `--auto` and `research_enabled` is false:** Skip research silently (preserves automated behavior).
+
+Display banner:
+```
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+ rcode ► RESEARCHING PHASE {X}
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+◆ Spawning researcher...
+```
+
+### Spawn rcode-phase-researcher
+
+```bash
+PHASE_DESC=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick section)
+```
+
+Research prompt:
+
+```markdown
+<objective>
+Research how to implement Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
+Answer: "What do I need to know to PLAN this phase well?"
+</objective>
+
+<files_to_read>
+- {context_path} (USER DECISIONS from /rcode-discuss-phase)
+- {requirements_path} (Project requirements)
+- {state_path} (Project decisions and history)
+</files_to_read>
+
+${AGENT_SKILLS_RESEARCHER}
+
+<additional_context>
+**Phase description:** {phase_description}
+**Phase requirement IDs (MUST address):** {phase_req_ids}
+
+**Project instructions:** Read ./CLAUDE.md if exists — follow project-specific guidelines
+**Project skills:** Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory (if either exists) — read SKILL.md files, research should account for project skill patterns
+</additional_context>
+
+<output>
+Write to: {phase_dir}/{phase_num}-RESEARCH.md
+
+**MANDATORY section — include even if brief:**
+
+```markdown
+## Validation Architecture
+
+| Concern | Test File | Command | When (Wave) |
+|---------|-----------|---------|-------------|
+| {feature} | {path/to/test.ts} | {run command} | Wave {N} |
+```
+
+This section is required to enable Dimension 8 (Nyquist Compliance) in the plan checker. If no automated tests are feasible for this phase, write:
+
+```markdown
+## Validation Architecture
+
+Manual verification only — no automated test files planned for this phase.
+Reason: {explain why}
+```
+</output>
+```
+
+```
+Task(
+  prompt=research_prompt,
+  subagent_type="rcode-phase-researcher",
+  model="{model}",
+  model="{researcher_model}",
+  description="Research Phase {phase}"
+)
+```
+
+### Handle Researcher Return
+
+- **`## RESEARCH COMPLETE`:** Display confirmation, continue to step 6
+- **`## RESEARCH BLOCKED`:** Display blocker, offer: 1) Provide context, 2) Skip research, 3) Abort
+
+## 5.5. Create Validation Strategy
+
+Skip if `nyquist_validation_enabled` is false OR `research_enabled` is false.
+
+If `research_enabled` is false and `nyquist_validation_enabled` is true: warn "Nyquist validation enabled but research disabled — VALIDATION.md cannot be created without RESEARCH.md. Plans will lack validation requirements (Dimension 8)." Continue to step 6.
+
+**But Nyquist is not applicable for this run** when all of the following are true:
+- `research_enabled` is false
+- `has_research` is false
+- no `--research` flag was provided
+
+In that case: **skip validation-strategy creation entirely**. Do **not** expect `RESEARCH.md` or `VALIDATION.md` for this run, and continue to Step 6.
+
+```bash
+grep -l "## Validation Architecture" "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-RESEARCH.md 2>/dev/null || true
+```
+
+**If found:**
+1. Read template: `.rcode/templates/VALIDATION.md`
+2. Write to `${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-VALIDATION.md` (use Write tool)
+3. Fill frontmatter: `{N}` → phase number, `{phase-slug}` → slug, `{date}` → current date
+4. Verify:
+```bash
+test -f "${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-VALIDATION.md" && echo "VALIDATION_CREATED=true" || echo "VALIDATION_CREATED=false"
+```
+5. If `VALIDATION_CREATED=false`: STOP — do not proceed to Step 6
+6. If `commit_docs`: `commit "docs(phase-${PHASE}): add validation strategy"`
+
+**If not found:** Warn and continue — plans may fail Dimension 8.
+
+## 5.55. Security Threat Model Gate
+
+> Skip if `workflow.security_enforcement` is explicitly `false`. Absent = enabled.
+
+```bash
+SECURITY_CFG=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.security_enforcement --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
+SECURITY_ASVS=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.security_asvs_level --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "1")
+SECURITY_BLOCK=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.security_block_on --raw 2>/dev/null || echo "high")
+```
+
+**If `SECURITY_CFG` is `false`:** Skip to step 5.6.
+
+**If `SECURITY_CFG` is `true`:** Display banner:
+
+```
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+ rcode ► SECURITY THREAT MODEL REQUIRED (ASVS L{SECURITY_ASVS})
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+
+Each SPRINT.md must include a <threat_model> block.
+Block on: {SECURITY_BLOCK} severity threats.
+Opt out: set security_enforcement: false in .rcode/config.yaml (`node .rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs config-set security_enforcement false`)
+```
+
+Continue to step 5.6. Security config is passed to the planner in step 8.
+
+## 5.6. UI Design Contract Gate
+
+> Skip if `workflow.ui_phase` is explicitly `false` AND `workflow.ui_safety_gate` is explicitly `false` in `.rcode/config.yaml`. If keys are absent, treat as enabled.
+
+```bash
+UI_PHASE_CFG=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.ui_phase 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
+UI_GATE_CFG=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.ui_safety_gate 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
+```
+
+**If both are `false`:** Skip to step 6.
+
+Check if phase has frontend indicators:
+
+```bash
+PHASE_SECTION=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${PHASE}" 2>/dev/null)
+echo "$PHASE_SECTION" | grep -iE "UI|interface|frontend|component|layout|page|screen|view|form|dashboard|widget" > /dev/null 2>&1
+HAS_UI=$?
+```
+
+**If `HAS_UI` is 0 (frontend indicators found):**
+
+Check for existing UI-SPEC:
+```bash
+UI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+```
+
+**If UI-SPEC.md found:** Set `UI_SPEC_PATH=$UI_SPEC_FILE`. Display: `Using UI design contract: ${UI_SPEC_PATH}`
+
+**If UI-SPEC.md missing AND `UI_GATE_CFG` is `true`:**
+
+Read auto-chain state:
+```bash
+AUTO_CHAIN=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow._auto_chain_active 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
+```
+
+**If `AUTO_CHAIN` is `true` (running inside a `--chain` or `--auto` pipeline):**
+
+Auto-generate UI-SPEC without prompting:
+```
+Skill(skill="rcode-ui-phase", args="${PHASE} --auto ${RCODE_WS}")
+```
+After `rcode-ui-phase` returns, re-read:
+```bash
+UI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+UI_SPEC_PATH="${UI_SPEC_FILE}"
+```
+Continue to step 6.
+
+**If `AUTO_CHAIN` is `false` (manual invocation):**
+
+If `TEXT_MODE` is true, present as a plain-text numbered list:
+```
+Phase {N} has frontend indicators but no UI-SPEC.md. Generate a design contract before planning?
+
+1. Generate UI-SPEC first — Run /rcode-ui-phase {N} then re-run /rcode-plan {N}
+2. Continue without UI-SPEC
+3. Not a frontend phase
+
+Enter number:
+```
+
+Otherwise use AskUserQuestion:
+- header: "UI Design Contract"
+- question: "Phase {N} has frontend indicators but no UI-SPEC.md. Generate a design contract before planning?"
+- options:
+  - "Generate UI-SPEC first" → Display: "Run `/rcode-ui-phase {N} ${RCODE_WS}` then re-run `/rcode-plan {N} ${RCODE_WS}`". Exit workflow.
+  - "Continue without UI-SPEC" → Continue to step 6.
+  - "Not a frontend phase" → Continue to step 6.
+
+**If `HAS_UI` is 1 (no frontend indicators):** Skip silently to step 5.7.
+
+## 5.7. Schema Push Detection Gate
+
+> Detects schema-relevant files in the phase scope and injects a mandatory `[BLOCKING]` schema push task into the plan. Prevents false-positive verification where build/types pass because TypeScript types come from config, not the live database.
+
+Check if any files in the phase scope match schema patterns:
+
+```bash
+PHASE_SECTION=$(node ".rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" roadmap get-phase "${PHASE}" --pick section 2>/dev/null)
+```
+
+Scan `PHASE_SECTION`, `CONTEXT.md` (if loaded), and `RESEARCH.md` (if exists) for file paths matching these ORM patterns:
+
+| ORM | File Patterns |
+|-----|--------------|
+| Payload CMS | `src/collections/**/*.ts`, `src/globals/**/*.ts` |
+| Prisma | `prisma/schema.prisma`, `prisma/schema/*.prisma` |
+| Drizzle | `drizzle/schema.ts`, `src/db/schema.ts`, `drizzle/*.ts` |
+| Supabase | `supabase/migrations/*.sql` |
+| TypeORM | `src/entities/**/*.ts`, `src/migrations/**/*.ts` |
+
+Also check if any existing SPRINT.md files for this phase already reference these file patterns in `files_modified`.
+
+**If schema-relevant files detected:**
+
+Set `SCHEMA_PUSH_REQUIRED=true` and `SCHEMA_ORM={detected_orm}`.
+
+Determine the push command for the detected ORM:
+
+| ORM | Push Command | Non-TTY Workaround |
+|-----|-------------|-------------------|
+| Payload CMS | `npx payload migrate` | `CI=true PAYLOAD_MIGRATING=true npx payload migrate` |
+| Prisma | `npx prisma db push` | `npx prisma db push --accept-data-loss` (if destructive) |
+| Drizzle | `npx drizzle-kit push` | `npx drizzle-kit push` |
+| Supabase | `supabase db push` | Set `SUPABASE_ACCESS_TOKEN` env var |
+| TypeORM | `npx typeorm migration:run` | `npx typeorm migration:run -d src/data-source.ts` |
+
+Inject the following into the planner prompt (step 8) as an additional constraint:
+
+```markdown
+<schema_push_requirement>
+**[BLOCKING] Schema Push Required**
+
+This phase modifies schema-relevant files ({detected_files}). The planner MUST include
+a `[BLOCKING]` task that runs the database schema push command AFTER all schema file
+modifications are complete but BEFORE verification.
+
+- ORM detected: {SCHEMA_ORM}
+- Push command: {push_command}
+- Non-TTY workaround: {env_hint}
+- If push requires interactive prompts that cannot be suppressed, flag the task for
+  manual intervention with `autonomous: false`
+
+This task is mandatory — the phase CANNOT pass verification without it. Build and
+type checks will pass without the push (types come from config, not the live database),
+creating a false-positive verification state.
+</schema_push_requirement>
+```
+
+Display: `Schema files detected ({SCHEMA_ORM}) — [BLOCKING] push task will be injected into plans`
+
+**If no schema-relevant files detected:** Skip silently to step 6.
+
+
+## Next Up
+
+This is a sub-step invoked by `/rcode-plan`. If you reached this directly:
+
+- `/rcode-plan` — re-enter the parent flow which validates research and dispatches the planner
+- `/rcode-status` — see where you are in the current phase lifecycle