@hanzlaa/rcode 3.6.15 → 4.0.0

package/rcode/workflows/code-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
+<purpose>
+Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Computes file scope (--files override > SUMMARY.md > git diff fallback), checks config gate, spawns rcode-reviewer agent, commits REVIEW.md, and presents results to user.
+</purpose>
+
+<required_reading>
+Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
+</required_reading>
+
+<available_agent_types>
+- rcode-reviewer: Reviews source files for bugs and quality issues
+</available_agent_types>
+
+## Step 0 — Usage check
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or contains only `--help` or `-h`:
+- Print the usage block below
+- STOP — do not proceed
+
+**Usage:**
+```
+/rcode-review <phase> [--depth=quick|standard|deep] [--files=path1,path2] [--karpathy]
+```
+
+**Examples:**
+```
+/rcode-review 01
+/rcode-review 02.1 --depth=deep
+/rcode-review 03 --files=src/auth.js,src/db.js
+/rcode-review HEAD~5..HEAD --karpathy
+```
+
+## Step 0a — Karpathy mode delegation
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `--karpathy`, delegate to the Karpathy 4-principle audit workflow and stop:
+
+```
+Read and execute @.rcode/workflows/karpathy-audit.md end-to-end with the same arguments minus `--karpathy`.
+```
+
+The standard code-review steps below are skipped when `--karpathy` is set — the karpathy-audit workflow produces its own report.
+
+## Step 0b — Attack mode delegation
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `--attack`, delegate to the attack-mode review workflow and stop:
+
+```
+Read and execute @.rcode/workflows/review-adversarial.md end-to-end with the same arguments minus `--attack`.
+```
+
+Attack mode produces a weakness report from a hostile perspective — security vulnerabilities, race conditions, data loss, abuse cases. The standard code-review steps below are skipped when `--attack` is set.
+
+## Step 0c — Edge cases mode delegation
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` contains `--edge-cases`, delegate to the edge-case-hunter workflow and stop:
+
+```
+Read and execute @.rcode/workflows/review-edge-case-hunter.md end-to-end with the same arguments minus `--edge-cases`.
+```
+
+Edge-cases mode enumerates boundary conditions by category (input, state, concurrency, network) with severity. The standard code-review steps below are skipped when `--edge-cases` is set.
+
+<process>
+
+<step name="initialize">
+Parse arguments and load project state:
+
+```bash
+PHASE_ARG="${1}"
+INIT=$(node "$PROJECT_ROOT/.rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" init phase-op "${PHASE_ARG}" 2>/dev/null)
+if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
+```
+
+If `INIT` is empty or `INIT.ok` is false, print error and exit:
+```
+Error: rcode-tools init failed. Verify .rcode/ is installed and state.json is valid.
+```
+
+Parse from init JSON: `phase_found`, `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`, `padded_phase`, `commit_docs`, `response_language`.
+
+**If `response_language` is set:** include `Respond in {response_language}.` in all spawned subagent prompts.
+
+**Input sanitization (defense-in-depth):**
+```bash
+# Validate PADDED_PHASE contains only digits and optional dot (e.g., "02", "03.1")
+if ! [[ "$PADDED_PHASE" =~ ^[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?$ ]]; then
+  echo "Error: Invalid phase number format: '${PADDED_PHASE}'. Expected digits (e.g., 02, 03.1)."
+  # Exit workflow
+fi
+```
+
+**Phase validation (before config gate):**
+If `phase_found` is false, report error and exit:
+```
+Error: Phase ${PHASE_ARG} not found. Run /rcode-status to see available phases.
+```
+
+This runs BEFORE config gate check so user errors are surfaced immediately regardless of config state.
+
+Parse optional flags from $ARGUMENTS:
+
+**--depth flag:**
+```bash
+DEPTH_OVERRIDE=""
+for arg in "$@"; do
+  if [[ "$arg" == --depth=* ]]; then
+    DEPTH_OVERRIDE="${arg#--depth=}"
+  fi
+done
+```
+
+**--files flag:**
+```bash
+FILES_OVERRIDE=""
+for arg in "$@"; do
+  if [[ "$arg" == --files=* ]]; then
+    FILES_OVERRIDE="${arg#--files=}"
+  fi
+done
+```
+
+If FILES_OVERRIDE is set, split by comma into array:
+```bash
+if [ -n "$FILES_OVERRIDE" ]; then
+  IFS=',' read -ra FILES_ARRAY <<< "$FILES_OVERRIDE"
+fi
+```
+</step>
+
+<step name="check_config_gate">
+Check if code review is enabled via config:
+
+```bash
+CODE_REVIEW_ENABLED=$(node "$PROJECT_ROOT/.rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.code_review 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
+```
+
+If CODE_REVIEW_ENABLED is "false":
+```
+Code review skipped (workflow.code_review=false in config)
+```
+Exit workflow.
+
+Default is true — only skip on explicit false. This check runs AFTER phase validation so invalid phase errors are shown first.
+</step>
+
+<step name="resolve_depth">
+Determine review depth with priority order:
+
+1. DEPTH_OVERRIDE from --depth flag (highest priority)
+2. Config value: `node "$PROJECT_ROOT/.rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.code_review_depth 2>/dev/null`
+3. Default: "standard"
+
+```bash
+if [ -n "$DEPTH_OVERRIDE" ]; then
+  REVIEW_DEPTH="$DEPTH_OVERRIDE"
+else
+  CONFIG_DEPTH=$(node "$PROJECT_ROOT/.rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.code_review_depth 2>/dev/null || echo "")
+  REVIEW_DEPTH="${CONFIG_DEPTH:-standard}"
+fi
+```
+
+**Validate depth value:**
+```bash
+case "$REVIEW_DEPTH" in
+  quick|standard|deep)
+    # Valid
+    ;;
+  *)
+    echo "Warning: Invalid depth '${REVIEW_DEPTH}'. Valid values: quick, standard, deep. Using 'standard'."
+    REVIEW_DEPTH="standard"
+    ;;
+esac
+```
+</step>
+
+<step name="compute_file_scope">
+Three-tier scoping with explicit precedence:
+
+**Tier 1 — --files override (highest precedence per D-08):**
+
+If FILES_OVERRIDE is set (from --files flag):
+```bash
+if [ -n "$FILES_OVERRIDE" ]; then
+  REVIEW_FILES=()
+  REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
+  
+  for file_path in "${FILES_ARRAY[@]}"; do
+    # Security: validate path is within repository (prevent path traversal)
+    ABS_PATH=$(realpath -m "${file_path}" 2>/dev/null || echo "${file_path}")
+    if [[ "$ABS_PATH" != "$REPO_ROOT"* ]]; then
+      echo "Error: File path outside repository, skipping: ${file_path}"
+      continue
+    fi
+    
+    # Validate path exists (relative to repo root)
+    if [ -f "${REPO_ROOT}/${file_path}" ] || [ -f "${file_path}" ]; then
+      REVIEW_FILES+=("$file_path")
+    else
+      echo "Warning: File not found, skipping: ${file_path}"
+    fi
+  done
+  
+  echo "File scope: ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} files from --files override"
+fi
+```
+
+Skip SUMMARY/git scoping entirely when --files is provided.
+
+**Tier 2 — SUMMARY.md extraction (primary per D-01):**
+
+If --files NOT provided:
+```bash
+if [ -z "$FILES_OVERRIDE" ]; then
+  SUMMARIES=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null)
+  REVIEW_FILES=()
+  
+  if [ -n "$SUMMARIES" ]; then
+    for summary in $SUMMARIES; do
+      # Extract key_files using grep and awk for portable parsing
+      EXTRACTED=$(grep -A 100 "key_files:" "$summary" 2>/dev/null | \
+        grep "^\s*-\s" | \
+        sed 's/^\s*-\s*//' | \
+        grep -v "^$")
+      
+      # Add extracted files to REVIEW_FILES array
+      if [ -n "$EXTRACTED" ]; then
+        while IFS= read -r file; do
+          if [ -n "$file" ]; then
+            REVIEW_FILES+=("$file")
+          fi
+        done <<< "$EXTRACTED"
+      fi
+    done
+    
+    if [ ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} -eq 0 ]; then
+      echo "Warning: SUMMARY artifacts found but contained no file paths. Falling back to git diff."
+    fi
+  fi
+fi
+```
+
+**Tier 3 — Git diff fallback (per D-02):**
+
+If no SUMMARY.md files found OR no files extracted from them:
+```bash
+if [ ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} -eq 0 ]; then
+  # Compute diff base from phase commits — fail closed if no reliable base found
+  PHASE_COMMITS=$(git log --oneline --all --grep="${PADDED_PHASE}" --format="%H" 2>/dev/null)
+  
+  if [ -n "$PHASE_COMMITS" ]; then
+    DIFF_BASE=$(echo "$PHASE_COMMITS" | tail -1)^
+    
+    # Verify the parent commit exists (first commit in repo has no parent)
+    if ! git rev-parse "${DIFF_BASE}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+      DIFF_BASE=$(echo "$PHASE_COMMITS" | tail -1)
+    fi
+    
+    # Run git diff with specific exclusions (per D-03)
+    DIFF_FILES=$(git diff --name-only "${DIFF_BASE}..HEAD" -- . \
+      ':!.planning/' ':!ROADMAP.md' ':!STATE.md' \
+      ':!*-SUMMARY.md' ':!*-VERIFICATION.md' ':!*-SPRINT.md' \
+      ':!package-lock.json' ':!yarn.lock' ':!Gemfile.lock' ':!poetry.lock' 2>/dev/null)
+    
+    while IFS= read -r file; do
+      [ -n "$file" ] && REVIEW_FILES+=("$file")
+    done <<< "$DIFF_FILES"
+    
+    echo "File scope: ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} files from git diff (base: ${DIFF_BASE})"
+  else
+    # Fail closed — no reliable diff base found. Do not use arbitrary HEAD~N.
+    echo "Warning: No phase commits found for '${PADDED_PHASE}'. Cannot determine reliable diff scope."
+    echo "Use --files flag to specify files explicitly: /rcode-review ${PHASE_ARG} --files=file1,file2,..."
+  fi
+fi
+```
+
+**Post-processing (all tiers):**
+
+1. **Apply exclusions (per D-03):** Remove paths matching planning artifacts
+```bash
+FILTERED_FILES=()
+for file in "${REVIEW_FILES[@]}"; do
+  # Skip planning directory and specific artifacts
+  if [[ "$file" == .planning/* ]] || \
+     [[ "$file" == ROADMAP.md ]] || \
+     [[ "$file" == STATE.md ]] || \
+     [[ "$file" == *-SUMMARY.md ]] || \
+     [[ "$file" == *-VERIFICATION.md ]] || \
+     [[ "$file" == *-SPRINT.md ]]; then
+    continue
+  fi
+  FILTERED_FILES+=("$file")
+done
+REVIEW_FILES=("${FILTERED_FILES[@]}")
+```
+
+2. **Filter deleted files:** Remove paths that don't exist on disk
+```bash
+EXISTING_FILES=()
+DELETED_COUNT=0
+for file in "${REVIEW_FILES[@]}"; do
+  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
+    EXISTING_FILES+=("$file")
+  else
+    DELETED_COUNT=$((DELETED_COUNT + 1))
+  fi
+done
+REVIEW_FILES=("${EXISTING_FILES[@]}")
+
+if [ $DELETED_COUNT -gt 0 ]; then
+  echo "Filtered $DELETED_COUNT deleted files from review scope"
+fi
+```
+
+3. **Deduplicate:** Remove duplicate paths (portable — bash 3.2+ compatible, handles spaces in paths)
+```bash
+DEDUPED=()
+while IFS= read -r line; do
+  [ -n "$line" ] && DEDUPED+=("$line")
+done < <(printf '%s\n' "${REVIEW_FILES[@]}" | sort -u)
+REVIEW_FILES=("${DEDUPED[@]}")
+```
+
+4. **Sort:** Alphabetical sort for reproducible agent input (already sorted by sort -u above)
+
+**Log final scope and warn if large:**
+```bash
+if [ -n "$FILES_OVERRIDE" ]; then
+  TIER="--files override"
+elif [ -n "$SUMMARIES" ] && [ ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
+  TIER="SUMMARY.md"
+else
+  TIER="git diff"
+fi
+echo "File scope: ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} files from ${TIER}"
+
+# Warn if file count is very large — may exceed agent context or produce superficial review
+if [ ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} -gt 50 ]; then
+  echo "Warning: ${#REVIEW_FILES[@]} files is a large review scope."
+  echo "Consider using --files to narrow scope, or --depth=quick for a faster pass."
+  if [ "$REVIEW_DEPTH" = "deep" ]; then
+    echo "Switching from deep to standard depth for large file count."
+    REVIEW_DEPTH="standard"
+  fi
+fi
+```
+</step>
+
+<step name="check_empty_scope">
+If REVIEW_FILES is empty:
+```
+No source files changed in phase ${PHASE_ARG}. Skipping review.
+```
+Exit workflow. Do NOT spawn agent or create REVIEW.md.
+</step>
+
+<step name="spawn_reviewer">
+Compute the review output path:
+```bash
+REVIEW_PATH="${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-REVIEW.md"
+```
+
+Compute DIFF_BASE for agent context (in case agent needs it):
+```bash
+PHASE_COMMITS=$(git log --oneline --all --grep="${PADDED_PHASE}" --format="%H" 2>/dev/null)
+if [ -n "$PHASE_COMMITS" ]; then
+  DIFF_BASE=$(echo "$PHASE_COMMITS" | tail -1)^
+else
+  DIFF_BASE=""
+fi
+```
+
+Build files_to_read block for agent:
+```bash
+FILES_TO_READ=""
+for file in "${REVIEW_FILES[@]}"; do
+  FILES_TO_READ+="- ${file}\n"
+done
+```
+
+Build config block for agent:
+```bash
+CONFIG_FILES=""
+for file in "${REVIEW_FILES[@]}"; do
+  CONFIG_FILES+="  - ${file}\n"
+done
+```
+
+Spawn the rcode-reviewer agent:
+
+```
+Task(subagent_type="rcode-code-reviewer",
+  model="{model}", prompt="
+<files_to_read>
+${FILES_TO_READ}
+</files_to_read>
+
+<config>
+depth: ${REVIEW_DEPTH}
+phase_dir: ${PHASE_DIR}
+review_path: ${REVIEW_PATH}
+${DIFF_BASE:+diff_base: ${DIFF_BASE}}
+files:
+${CONFIG_FILES}
+</config>
+
+Review the listed source files at ${REVIEW_DEPTH} depth. Write findings to ${REVIEW_PATH}.
+Do NOT commit the output — the orchestrator handles that.
+
+The REVIEW.md file MUST begin with YAML frontmatter in exactly this format:
+---
+status: clean | issues_found | skipped
+phase: <phase_number or HEAD~N..HEAD>
+files_reviewed: <count>
+critical: <count>
+high: <count>
+medium: <count>
+low: <count>
+generated: <ISO timestamp>
+---
+
+Use severity: critical (must fix, security/data-loss/broken), high (should fix, correctness/coverage), medium (consider, poor patterns), low (optional, style/naming).
+")
+```
+
+**Agent failure handling:**
+
+If the Task() call fails (agent error, timeout, or exception):
+```
+Error: Code review agent failed: ${error_message}
+
+No REVIEW.md created. You can retry with /rcode-review ${PHASE_ARG} or check agent logs.
+```
+
+Do NOT proceed to commit_review step. Do NOT create a partial or empty REVIEW.md. Exit workflow.
+</step>
+
+<step name="karpathy_audit_pass">
+After spawning the code reviewer agent, perform a Karpathy principles audit on the review findings:
+
+**Check the 4 principles against REVIEW.md findings:**
+
+1. **Think Before Coding** — Are there issues about hidden assumptions or unclear requirements?
+   - Look for findings mentioning "unclear intent", "ambiguous", "multiple interpretations"
+   - Flag if code makes assumptions without documenting them
+
+2. **Simplicity First** — Are there overengineered, speculative, or unnecessary features?
+   - Look for findings mentioning "overcomplicated", "unnecessary abstraction", "unused code", "feature not requested"
+   - Flag if code adds features beyond what was asked
+
+3. **Surgical Changes** — Are there unnecessary style changes, refactorings of unrelated code, or unclean cleanup?
+   - Look for findings mentioning "reformatted", "improved adjacent code", "style cleanup"
+   - Flag if changes touch more than required
+
+4. **Goal-Driven Execution** — Are success criteria clear? Are there stubs or incomplete implementations?
+   - Look for findings mentioning "stub", "TODO", "incomplete", "mock", "placeholder"
+   - Flag if code has weak or missing verification criteria
+
+**Output:** If Karpathy violations found, append to REVIEW.md:
+
+```markdown
+## Karpathy Principles Audit
+
+Violations of Andrej Karpathy's coding guidelines detected:
+
+- **Principle 2 (Simplicity):** Found 3 instances of speculative code (unused error handlers, mock data patterns)
+- **Principle 3 (Surgical):** Found style reformatting in 2 unrelated files not part of the requested change
+
+Recommend reviewing these violations before merging.
+```
+
+If no violations, add to REVIEW.md:
+
+```markdown
+## Karpathy Principles Audit
+
+✓ Code adheres to all 4 Karpathy principles. No violations detected.
+```
+
+This audit does NOT block the workflow — it surfaces principles violations for the user's awareness.
+</step>
+
+<step name="commit_review">
+After agent completes successfully, verify REVIEW.md was created and has valid structure:
+
+```bash
+if [ -f "${REVIEW_PATH}" ]; then
+  # Validate REVIEW.md has valid YAML frontmatter with status field using grep
+  HAS_STATUS=$(head -20 "${REVIEW_PATH}" | grep -q "^status:" && echo "valid" || echo "invalid")
+  
+  if [ "$HAS_STATUS" = "valid" ]; then
+    echo "REVIEW.md created at ${REVIEW_PATH}"
+    
+    if [ "$COMMIT_DOCS" = "true" ]; then
+      node "$PROJECT_ROOT/.rcode/bin/rcode-tools.cjs" commit \
+        "docs(${PADDED_PHASE}): add code review report" \
+        --files "${REVIEW_PATH}"
+    fi
+  else
+    echo "Warning: REVIEW.md exists but has invalid or missing frontmatter (no status field)."
+    echo "Agent may have produced malformed output. Not committing. Review manually: ${REVIEW_PATH}"
+  fi
+else
+  echo "Warning: Agent completed but REVIEW.md not found at ${REVIEW_PATH}. This may indicate an agent issue."
+  echo "No REVIEW.md to commit. Please retry with /rcode-review ${PHASE_ARG}"
+fi
+```
+</step>
+
+<step name="present_results">
+Read the REVIEW.md YAML frontmatter to extract finding counts.
+
+Extract frontmatter between `---` delimiters first to avoid matching values in the review body:
+
+```bash
+# Extract only the YAML frontmatter block (between first two --- lines) using sed
+FRONTMATTER=$(sed -n '2,/^---$/p' "${REVIEW_PATH}" 2>/dev/null | head -n -1)
+
+# Parse fields from frontmatter only (not full file)
+STATUS=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^status:" | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+FILES_REVIEWED=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^files_reviewed:" | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+CRITICAL=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^critical:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+HIGH=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^high:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+MEDIUM=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^medium:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+LOW=$(echo "$FRONTMATTER" | grep "^low:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f2 | xargs)
+TOTAL=$(( ${CRITICAL:-0} + ${HIGH:-0} + ${MEDIUM:-0} + ${LOW:-0} ))
+```
+
+Display inline summary to user:
+
+```
+═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+
+  Code Review Complete: Phase ${PHASE_NUMBER} (${PHASE_NAME})
+
+───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+  Depth:           ${REVIEW_DEPTH}
+  Files Reviewed:  ${FILES_REVIEWED}
+  
+  Findings:
+    Critical:  ${CRITICAL}
+    High:      ${HIGH}
+    Medium:    ${MEDIUM}
+    Low:       ${LOW}
+    ──────────
+    Total:     ${TOTAL}
+
+───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+```
+
+If status is "clean":
+```
+✓ No issues found. All ${FILES_REVIEWED} files pass review at ${REVIEW_DEPTH} depth.
+
+Full report: ${REVIEW_PATH}
+```
+
+If total findings > 0:
+```
+⚠ Issues found. Review the report for details.
+
+Full report: ${REVIEW_PATH}
+
+Next steps:
+  /rcode-review-fix ${PHASE_NUMBER}  — Auto-fix issues
+  cat ${REVIEW_PATH}                       — View full report
+```
+
+If critical > 0 or high > 0, list top 3 issues inline:
+```bash
+echo "Top issues:"
+grep -A 3 "^### CR-\|^### WR-" "${REVIEW_PATH}" | head -n 12
+```
+
+═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+</step>
+
+</process>
+
+<platform_notes>
+**Windows:** This workflow uses bash features (arrays, process substitution). On Windows, it requires
+Git Bash or WSL. Native PowerShell is not supported. The CI matrix (Ubuntu/macOS/Windows)
+runs under Git Bash on Windows runners, which provides bash compatibility.
+
+**macOS:** macOS ships with bash 3.2 (GPL licensing). This workflow does NOT use `mapfile` (bash 4+
+only) — all array construction uses portable `while IFS= read -r` loops compatible with bash 3.2.
+The `--files` path validation uses `realpath -m` which requires GNU coreutils (install via
+`brew install coreutils`). Without coreutils, the path guard falls back to fail-closed behavior
+(rejects paths it cannot verify), so security is maintained but valid relative paths may be rejected.
+If `--files` validation fails unexpectedly on macOS, install coreutils or use absolute paths.
+</platform_notes>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- [ ] Phase validated before config gate check
+- [ ] Config gate checked (workflow.code_review)
+- [ ] Depth resolved with validation (quick|standard|deep)
+- [ ] File scope computed with 3 tiers: --files > SUMMARY.md > git diff
+- [ ] Malformed/missing SUMMARY.md handled gracefully with fallback
+- [ ] Deleted files filtered from scope
+- [ ] Files deduplicated and sorted
+- [ ] Empty scope results in skip (no agent spawn)
+- [ ] Agent spawned with explicit file list, depth, review_path, diff_base
+- [ ] Agent failure handled without partial commits
+- [ ] REVIEW.md committed if created
+- [ ] Results presented inline with next step suggestion
+</success_criteria>
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- [ ] Config gate (`workflow.code_review`) verified before spawning the reviewer agent
+- [ ] File scope resolved via priority order: `--files` override → SUMMARY.md list → `git diff` fallback; deleted files excluded
+- [ ] `rcode-reviewer` agent spawned with explicit file list, depth setting, and `review_path`
+- [ ] Empty scope (no changed files) results in a clean skip — no agent spawned
+- [ ] `REVIEW.md` written to `.planning/phases/<N>/REVIEW.md` and committed
+- [ ] Results presented inline with a next-step suggestion (e.g., `/rcode-code-review-fix`)
+
+## On Error
+
+If arguments are invalid, missing files, or subagent fails:
+- Validate inputs match expected format
+- Check that required files exist
+- Retry with clearer arguments or report the specific error to the user
+
+
+## Next Up
+
+- `/rcode-review-fix` — auto-fix the issues surfaced in REVIEW.md
+- `/rcode-verify-phase` — verify phase goal after review is clean