@getollie/cli 0.0.1

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-hotel-booking-page.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1146,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. We need a complete hotel booking functionality page for WeChat Mini Program, including the js, wxss, and wxml files.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the hotel booking core functionality implemented completely?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the core booking flow including hotel search, room selection, date picker, guest information form, and payment interface. Check if all required input validations are in place. Score 0 if the core booking flow is missing, 5 if only partial functionality is implemented, and 10 if the complete end-to-end booking process is implemented with proper state management.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Are the WeChat Mini Program specific APIs utilized correctly?",
+      "description": "Evaluate the usage of WeChat-specific APIs such as wx.request for data fetching, wx.navigateTo for navigation, wx.showToast for notifications, and wx.login for authentication. Verify integration with WeChat payment APIs if applicable. Deduct 3 points if essential WeChat APIs are not used, 5 points if they're used incorrectly, and 10 points if all necessary WeChat APIs are properly implemented and error-handled.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the MVVM architecture properly implemented with proper data binding?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code follows WeChat Mini Program's MVVM pattern with proper separation of view (wxml), styling (wxss), and logic (js). Verify that data binding, event handling, and conditional rendering are implemented correctly. Deduct 5 points if the separation is poor, 3 points if data binding is inconsistent, and give 10 points if the architecture is clean with proper data flow.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Are the required UI components for hotel booking implemented?",
+      "description": "Verify implementation of essential components: date picker with availability display, room type selector with images, amenities list, pricing breakdown, guest information form, and booking confirmation page. Evaluate how these components interact. Give 3 points for basic implementation, 7 points for functional but basic UI, and 10 points for comprehensive components with proper state management.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, invalid inputs, payment failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time room availability indicators 2. Dynamic pricing based on dates 3. Integration with map to show hotel location 4. Room comparison tool). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple date selection methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to hotel booking (e.g., an unnecessary social sharing feature) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations when scrolling through hotel options). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, API calls, and business logic), component reusability, and naming conventions. Deduct 5 points if global state management is messy or nonexistent; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no error handling for API calls. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual style (proper padding/margins, standard button styles) 2) Proper layout spacing (following the grid system) 3) Professional typography (readable font sizes, proper hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat guidelines, 5 points for inconsistent styling across pages, and 5 points for poor information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the interactions conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Appropriate loading states during API calls 2) Smooth transitions between pages 3) Responsive touch feedback on interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for missing loading indicators, 3 points for jarring page transitions, and 5 points for unresponsive or confusing UI elements. Check if the app handles orientation changes and different screen sizes properly. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-local-tour-waterfall.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1317,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable. I am creating a WeChat Mini Program as my graduation project, and now I need to create a \"Local Tour\" interface. This interface mainly adopts Taobao's waterfall flow style to display tourism products (such as a large image + title: One-day Tour of Shunde + price). Please implement this interface and its logic, providing code from scratch.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the waterfall flow display properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code correctly implements the waterfall flow layout with dynamic height calculation. The implementation should handle images of varying heights, ensure columns are balanced, and maintain responsive behavior across different device widths. Score 0 if waterfall flow is not implemented, 5 if basic implementation with fixed heights, and 10 if fully dynamic with optimal column balancing algorithm.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Does the code follow WeChat Mini Program development specifications?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the implementation uses proper WXML/WXSS/JS structure following Mini Program best practices. Check for correct use of Mini Program components (instead of HTML), proper page lifecycle methods, and adherence to WeChat's development guidelines. Deduct 5 points if using web-based approaches incompatible with Mini Programs, and 3 points if not utilizing built-in capabilities effectively. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the tourism product card design properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Review if the product cards follow the specified Taobao style with large image + title + price layout. Check for proper image handling (lazy loading, error handling), text truncation for long titles, and price formatting with currency symbol. Deduct 3 points if images are not optimized, 3 points if text overflow is not handled, and 3 points if price display doesn't match e-commerce standards. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Are the data loading and state management mechanisms properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Examine if the code implements proper data fetching, pagination, and state management for tourism products. Check for initial loading state, pull-to-refresh functionality, infinite scrolling with proper thresholds, and empty/error states. Deduct 5 points if pagination is not implemented, 3 points if loading states are missing, and 3 points if error handling is inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, empty data, image loading failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animated transitions between cards 2. Intelligent sorting of products based on user preferences 3. Pull-down category filters with smooth animations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scrolling event handlers) 2. Function modules unrelated to tourism products display 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or filters). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core waterfall flow functionality is interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components/data services/business logic), code organization following Mini Program conventions, and performance optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no performance optimizations for image loading or rendering are implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern mobile design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching that matches travel/tourism theme 2) Proper layout spacing with sufficient card margins (8-12rpx) 3) Professional typography system (title font size ≥ 28rpx, price with emphasis). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inconsistent visual hierarchy, and 5 points for poor information density. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Card tap feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth scroll performance without jank 3) Clear loading states during data fetching. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visible frame drops during scrolling, and 5 points for jerky waterfall flow rendering during column rebalancing. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-online-shopping.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1165,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. I am a programming novice and need to create a WeChat mini-program for online shopping. The content should include a changeable avatar at the top of the screen, the online store name below the avatar, and navigation options and product names further down.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat mini-program structure and configuration correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code includes proper app.json configuration with required pages, window settings, and tabBar navigation. Check if app.js contains valid lifecycle methods and global data management. Verify pages structure follows WeChat mini-program standards with .wxml, .wxss, .js, and .json files. Score 0 if basic mini-program structure is missing, 5 if only partial configuration is present, and 10 if complete standard structure is implemented with proper manifest configuration.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the avatar change functionality fully operational?",
+      "description": "Check whether the avatar change feature uses wx.chooseImage or wx.chooseMedia API correctly, includes image upload handling, and provides fallback for different image formats. Verify if the code handles image compression, local storage persistence, and error scenarios. Deduct 5 points if no image selection API is implemented, 3 points if image persistence is missing, and 2 points if error handling is inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Are the navigation and product display components properly structured?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the navigation uses proper WeChat components (navigator, tabbar, or custom navigation) and product list implements scroll-view or list rendering with wx:for. Check if data binding follows MVVM pattern and includes proper event handling for user interactions. Deduct 5 points if navigation doesn't follow WeChat UI guidelines, 3 points if product list lacks proper data binding, and 2 points if click events are not properly handled. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the shopping cart and order management system implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes add-to-cart functionality, cart item management, quantity adjustment, and basic order processing. Verify if local storage (wx.setStorageSync) is used for cart persistence and if the shopping flow is complete from product selection to order confirmation. Deduct 5 points if cart functionality is missing, 3 points if data persistence is not implemented, and 2 points if order flow is incomplete. Give 10 points if fully functional shopping system is present.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures, API errors, image loading failures, storage quota exceeded, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include try-catch blocks, loading states, and graceful degradation, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that enhance user experience?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes practical enhancements such as: 1. Product search and filtering 2. Favorites/wishlist functionality 3. User reviews and ratings 4. Share to WeChat moments 5. Scan QR code for products 6. Location-based store recommendations. Add 2 points for each well-implemented innovative feature (maximum 10 points). Features must be functional, not just UI mockups.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart storage methods coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to shopping (e.g., built-in games or entertainment features) 3. Overly complex animations that affect mini-program performance (e.g., heavy 3D effects or excessive particle systems). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core shopping functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (separating components, utils, and services), proper use of WeChat mini-program best practices, and code organization. Check for component reusability, proper data flow management, and adherence to WeChat development guidelines. Deduct 5 points if global data pollution is found or components are not properly encapsulated; deduct 3 points if code duplication rate is high; deduct 2 points if WeChat-specific optimizations are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface design meet WeChat mini-program design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows WeChat Design Guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat native UI components and color scheme 2) Proper use of rpx units for responsive design 3) Clear visual hierarchy with appropriate spacing (following 8rpx grid system) 4) Readable typography (minimum 28rpx for body text) 5) Proper use of WeChat official icons. Deduct 3 points for each design inconsistency, 5 points for poor responsive behavior, and 2 points for accessibility issues. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the interaction smooth and follows WeChat mini-program UX patterns?",
+      "description": "Judge whether interactions conform to WeChat mini-program standards: 1) Proper loading states and feedback (wx.showLoading, wx.showToast) 2) Smooth page transitions and navigation 3) Touch-friendly interactive elements (minimum 88rpx touch targets) 4) Proper use of WeChat native interactions (pull-to-refresh, reach-bottom loading). Deduct 5 points for each missing feedback mechanism, 3 points for slow or janky animations, and 2 points for poor touch responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-price-comparison-shopping.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 998,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable for demonstration. Design a WeChat Mini Program for shopping that can search and compare prices of the same products across different websites, identify the lowest priced item, and allow direct purchase within the mini program. Please generate source code for this mini program that can be directly copied and used.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the product search and price comparison system fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the search functionality that can query products across different e-commerce platforms, and if it correctly extracts and compares pricing data. Score 0 if the core search functionality is not implemented, 5 if only basic searching is available without proper price comparison logic, and 10 if the system can effectively search, normalize, and compare prices from multiple sources with proper sorting options.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the lowest price identification mechanism implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes logic to identify and highlight the lowest priced items across platforms. Evaluate if the system properly handles edge cases like identical prices, different shipping costs, or seller ratings affecting the overall value. Score 0 if no lowest price identification exists, 5 if basic comparison exists but doesn't account for additional costs/factors, and 10 if comprehensive price analysis with visual indicators is implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the in-app purchase system properly designed and integrated?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements the direct purchase functionality within the mini program without redirecting to external websites. Check for WeChat payment API integration, order management system, and purchase confirmation flow. Score 0 if no in-app purchase exists, 5 if purchase flow exists but requires external redirection, and 10 if the complete purchase system is integrated with WeChat Pay and order tracking.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the multi-platform data integration mechanism properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check if the code includes proper APIs or web scraping mechanisms to gather product data from multiple e-commerce platforms. Evaluate the approach for handling different data structures, authentication requirements, and rate limiting from various sources. Score 0 if no integration exists, 5 if basic integration with only 1-2 platforms, and 10 if comprehensive integration with multiple major platforms using proper error handling.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as search failures, network interruptions, price fluctuations, and payment issues) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Price history charts 2. Automatic coupon application 3. Product authenticity verification 4. Community reviews integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple search mechanisms coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to shopping comparison (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on product listings). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/API layers), use of WeChat Mini Program best practices, and proper component reusability. Deduct 5 points if global state management is poorly implemented; deduct 5 points if the code has high duplication rate (over 30%); deduct 5 points if proper Mini Program lifecycle hooks are not utilized. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's design language 2) Proper layout spacing and hierarchy 3) Professional typography system (following WeChat's font standards). Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat design principles, 5 points for inconsistent visual hierarchy, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program performance standards: 1) Search results loading time ≤ 2 seconds 2) Smooth transitions between product details 3) Responsive UI with proper loading states. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without loading feedback, 3 points for janky scrolling in product lists, and 5 points for non-intuitive navigation between key screens. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-restaurant-homepage.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1261,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable and demonstrable. Please design a homepage for a restaurant WeChat mini-program.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the core mini-program structure properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the basic structure of a WeChat mini-program with proper file organization (app.js, app.json, app.wxss, and page files). Check if page registration follows the standard mini-program pattern and if global configurations are correctly set. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if only partial structure is implemented, and 10 if the complete mini-program architecture is properly configured.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Does the restaurant homepage include all essential UI components?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the code includes all necessary restaurant homepage components: header with logo, food category navigation, featured dish carousel, promotion banners, restaurant information section (hours, location, contact), and a bottom navigation bar. Each missing essential component deducts 2 points. The implementation should follow WeChat mini-program standards using <view>, <image>, <text> and other native components correctly. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the mini-program navigation system properly designed?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code implements a proper navigation system including tab bar configuration in app.json, internal page navigation using navigator components, and proper event handling for user interactions. Deduct 3 points if tab bar is missing, 3 points if page navigation functions are incomplete, and 4 points if the navigation doesn't follow WeChat mini-program best practices. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Does the code appropriately handle data binding and state management?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the implementation uses WeChat mini-program's data binding features correctly (Page data object, setData method), includes proper lifecycle methods (onLoad, onShow), and implements clean state management for dynamic content like dish listings, promotions, or order status. Deduct 5 points for improper data binding, 3 points for missing essential lifecycle methods, and 2 points for inefficient state management. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failure when loading restaurant data, image loading errors, unexpected user inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include try-catch blocks, conditional rendering for loading states, and proper error handling. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for basic handling, and 0 points if no error handling exists.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the restaurant experience (e.g., 1. Animated dish recommendations 2. Integrated table reservation system 3. Interactive menu with ingredient highlighting 4. Loyalty points visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to access the same menu) 2. Function modules unrelated to restaurant experience (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review component reusability (such as creating custom components for menu items, section headers), proper file organization, consistent naming conventions, and appropriate commenting. Deduct 3 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 3 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 4 points if the component structure is chaotic or non-existent. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat mini-program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (following the 8px rule) 3) Appropriate typography hierarchy (at least 3 text sizes for different content importance) 4) Restaurant branding integration. Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 3 points for inconsistent styling, 2 points for poor typography, and 2 points for weak brand integration. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the mobile interaction optimized for restaurant scenarios?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the interactions are optimized for restaurant-specific user flows: 1) One-handed operation accessibility 2) Quick access to menu/ordering 3) Clear call-to-actions for reservations or delivery 4) Logical information hierarchy for decision making. Deduct 3 points for requiring two hands to operate key functions, 3 points for buried critical restaurant information, 2 points for confusing ordering process, and 2 points for poor touch target sizing (< 44px). The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-shawls-fur-products.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1208,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Create a WeChat Mini Program about shawls and fur products similar to the Dior WeChat Mini Program. I'm using the WeChat Developer Tools.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program registration and configuration properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes complete WeChat Mini Program registration in app.js, proper configuration in app.json (including pages array, window settings, tabBar if applicable), and correct project.config.json settings. Check if global styles are defined in app.wxss. Score 0 if core configuration files are missing, 5 if basic configuration is present but incomplete, and 10 if all required configurations are properly implemented with appropriate permissions for network requests.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Does the application implement a complete product showcase system?",
+      "description": "Check if the code includes comprehensive product display pages with proper information architecture (categories, collections, product details). Evaluate whether the product listings include high-quality image display with lazy loading, detailed product information (materials, dimensions, pricing), and multi-angle product viewing. Deduct 5 points if the product structure is illogical, 3 points if image optimization is missing, and 3 points if luxury product details (material origin, craftsmanship) are inadequate. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the shopping experience and cart functionality properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the code implements a complete shopping journey including add-to-cart, cart management, checkout process, and order confirmation. Check for features like quantity adjustment, product removal, price calculation, and persistent cart storage. Review if product variants (colors, sizes) are handled correctly. Deduct 5 points if the cart doesn't persist between sessions, 3 points if variant selection is buggy, and 5 points if the checkout flow is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the luxury brand visual identity and premium UX maintained throughout the Mini Program?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the code creates a premium experience similar to Dior with high-quality product imagery, brand-consistent typography, custom animations for transitions, and refined micro-interactions. Check if the implementation includes parallax scrolling, fade-in effects for product listings, and elegant loading states. Deduct 5 points for generic templates without brand customization, 3 points for missing luxury-level animations, and 5 points for poor visual hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common exceptions (network errors, empty states, loading states, permission denials, etc.) and provides appropriate feedback mechanisms. Check if there are fallbacks for failed image loading and retry mechanisms for API failures. Test edge cases like adding out-of-stock items or submitting incomplete forms. Code with strong robustness should handle these scenarios elegantly, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no error handling exists, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the luxury shopping experience (e.g., 1. Virtual try-on for shawls using AR 2. Material texture visualization through 3D rendering 3. Personalized styling recommendations 4. Interactive product storytelling). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product filtering systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to luxury fashion retail (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down browsing). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core shopping functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review the modular design (such as separating UI/business logic using MVVM pattern), component reusability, and code organization. Check if the code follows WeChat Mini Program best practices using proper Custom Components. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation between presentation and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional luxury brand design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows luxury design principles: 1) Refined color palette (primarily neutral colors with subtle accents) 2) Generous whitespace (minimum 16px margins, elegant typography with proper line height ≥1.6) 3) High-resolution imagery without pixelation 4) Subtle micro-animations that enhance perceived value. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inappropriate color combinations, and 5 points for poor typography implementation. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects provide a premium feel: 1) Immediate tap feedback (≤100ms) 2) Smooth scrolling without jank (60fps) 3) Elegant transitions between pages (300-500ms duration) 4) Tactile feedback aligned with luxury experience. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for abrupt transitions, and 5 points for non-intuitive navigation patterns. Check specifically for smooth image gallery swiping and elegant animation when adding products to cart. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "hard"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-shopping-features.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1550,
+  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the generated code is executable when demonstrated. Well, let me explain my requirements: my WeChat Mini Program needs to have functionality for collecting coupons, payment capabilities, and the ability to view products. Can you help me write this kind of code? And could you tell me where to modify the relevant code?",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the coupon collection functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes a complete coupon system with collection, storage, and usage mechanisms. Check for 1) Coupon listings page, 2) Collection interaction, 3) Coupon detail view, 4) Storage in user account, and 5) Expiration management. Score 0 if core coupon functionality is missing, 5 if basic collection is implemented without management features, and 10 if the full coupon lifecycle is managed.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the payment capability properly integrated?",
+      "description": "Review the implementation of the WeChat payment API, including 1) Pre-payment order creation, 2) Payment signature verification, 3) Payment callback handling, 4) Order status management, and 5) Payment error handling. Ensure the code includes proper security measures like signature validation. Deduct 5 points if the payment flow is incomplete, 3 points if error handling is missing, and 5 points if security validations are absent. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the product display functionality comprehensive?",
+      "description": "Check whether the product display includes 1) List and grid views, 2) Product detail pages with complete information (images, price, description, specifications), 3) Category filtering, 4) Search functionality, and 5) Product recommendation. Evaluate if the display adapts to different screen sizes. Deduct 2 points for each missing core feature and 5 points if responsive design is absent. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Does the code follow WeChat Mini Program development standards?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the code follows official WeChat Mini Program development patterns and best practices, including correct use of 1) Page lifecycle hooks, 2) Component system, 3) WXML/WXSS conventions, 4) App configuration, and 5) API usage. Deduct 3 points for each significant deviation from standards. Give 0 points if the code isn't specifically adapted for Mini Program environment, 5 points for basic compliance, and 10 points for full adherence to best practices.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, payment failures, API timeout, invalid coupon usage, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AR product preview 2. Social sharing with custom cards 3. Gamified coupon collection 4. Smart product recommendations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product listing methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to the core requirements (e.g., unnecessary social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., complex animations on product pages). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/view/API layers), code organization patterns, and maintenance considerations. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear folder structure or naming convention. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows Mini Program conventions) 3) Professional typography (readable font sizes, proper contrast). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistency with WeChat's design language, 5 points for cluttered layouts, and 5 points for poor readability. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to Mini Program user expectations: 1) Response to taps within 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between pages 3) Clear loading states for network operations 4) Intuitive gesture support. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for janky animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-store-orders.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1048,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Write a program for placing orders at stores in a WeChat Mini Program.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program order placement system structure complete?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code implements the essential components of a WeChat Mini Program order system: pages for product listing, product details, shopping cart, order confirmation, and order history. Check for proper navigation flow between these components. Score 0 if core pages are missing, 5 if basic pages exist but lack proper connections, and 10 if the complete order flow is implemented with all necessary transitions.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Does the implementation integrate properly with WeChat Mini Program APIs?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly uses WeChat-specific APIs like wx.request for network calls, wx.login for authentication, wx.payment for payment processing, and wx.getUserInfo for user profiles. Deduct 3 points if any critical WeChat API is missing, 5 points if APIs are used incorrectly, and 7 points if no WeChat-specific APIs are utilized at all. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the data persistence and state management properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes proper data storage using wx.setStorage/getStorage for local data, cloud database for remote persistence, and whether it handles synchronization between offline and online states. Evaluate if the shopping cart state persists across app restarts. Deduct 3 points if only local storage is used without cloud backup, 5 points if data can be lost during navigation, and 7 points if no persistence mechanism exists. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the payment flow securely and correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the payment process follows WeChat Pay security practices, including proper signature verification, order number generation, and completion handling. Check for payment status verification and receipt generation. Deduct 5 points if the payment flow lacks security measures, 3 points if receipt/confirmation is missing, and 7 points if the entire payment process is simulated without actual WeChat Pay integration. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, payment failures, product out-of-stock, invalid inputs) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Voice-based product search 2. AR product preview 3. Social sharing with custom images 4. Smart recommendations based on previous orders). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to calculate the same total price) 2. Function modules unrelated to order placement (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the ordering process). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, business logic, and API services), component reusability, and code organization following WeChat Mini Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or MVVM pattern is not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if custom components are not created for reusable elements. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat visual language (proper use of colors, buttons, and form elements) 2) Proper layout spacing (following WeChat's component spacing principles) 3) Professional typography (following WeChat's font hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for layouts that don't match WeChat standards, and 5 points for non-native looking components. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program user experience: 1) Page transitions match WeChat's native feel 2) Loading states are properly indicated 3) Button and interaction feedback is immediate and clear. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations or transitions, and 5 points for interactions that feel non-native to the WeChat environment. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}