@getollie/cli 0.0.1

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/fuzhou-themed-tourism-website.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1553,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Help me create a Fuzhou-themed tourism website with a navigation bar that includes homepage, login, registration, navigation, weather, special tourism products, scenic area details, and scenic area search. The navigation bar should display secondary pages when clicked. Please show the complete code.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the Fuzhou-themed tourism website structure fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a complete website structure with proper HTML5 semantic elements (header, nav, main, footer) and CSS organization. Check if all required pages are properly linked: homepage, login, registration, navigation, weather, tourism products, scenic area details, and search functionality. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if only partial pages are implemented, and 10 if all required pages are structurally complete with proper routing/linking.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the navigation bar with secondary pages functionality correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Examine whether the navigation bar includes all required sections and properly implements dropdown/secondary pages functionality. Check if the navigation transitions are smooth, and if proper event handling exists for showing/hiding secondary menus. Verify mobile responsiveness of the navigation system. Deduct 3 points if any section is missing, 5 points if dropdown functionality isn't working, and 3 points if mobile navigation isn't responsive. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the Fuzhou-themed design and content appropriately integrated?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the website incorporates authentic Fuzhou cultural elements, landmarks, and tourism information. Check for Fuzhou-specific imagery, color schemes reflecting local culture, and accurate descriptions of attractions. Deduct 5 points if generic tourism templates are used without customization, 3 points if Fuzhou-specific content is minimal, and 5 points if key Fuzhou attractions are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Are functional components (login, registration, search, weather) properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the functional components are properly implemented with appropriate input validation, form handling, and API integration (especially for weather data). Check if the search functionality includes filtering options and result display. Deduct 3 points for each non-functional component and 5 points if client-side validation is missing. Score 10 points only if all functional components are properly implemented with error handling.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, image loading failures, API errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive Fuzhou map with hotspots 2. Cultural mini-games showcasing local traditions 3. Virtual tour capabilities with 360° imagery). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple search implementations) 2. Function modules unrelated to tourism (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller components), code organization, file structure, and cross-browser compatibility. Deduct 5 points if global CSS/JS variables pollute the namespace; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no responsive design principles are applied. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (consistent with Fuzhou cultural elements) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/gamified-web-design-8th-grade-modern-chinese-history-knowledge.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 276,
+  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please create a gamified web-based design for the knowledge points of 8th grade Modern Chinese History (People's Education Press edition), and provide the specific code.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the core historical content accurately represented?",
+      "description": "Verify if the code accurately implements the key knowledge points from the 8th grade Modern Chinese History curriculum (People's Education Press edition), including critical historical events (1840-1949), important figures, and historical significance. Score 0 if major historical events are missing or inaccurately portrayed, 5 if basic content is present but lacks depth, and 10 if comprehensive coverage with proper historical context is provided.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the gamification system effectively designed?",
+      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of game mechanics such as scoring systems, achievement badges, level progression, challenges/quizzes, and reward mechanisms that enhance learning. Check if the game elements are aligned with educational objectives rather than being merely decorative. Deduct 5 points if gamification is superficial (e.g., only points without meaningful progression), and 3 points if engagement mechanics don't reinforce historical knowledge. Full score for a comprehensive system that balances entertainment with educational value.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the interactive learning experience properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the code implements interactive elements like timeline exploration, historical scenario simulations, decision-making activities based on historical events, or knowledge verification quizzes. Verify that interactions provide meaningful feedback that reinforces learning. Deduct 5 points if interactions are limited to basic clicking without educational value, 3 points if feedback mechanisms are missing. Full score requires diverse interaction types that support different learning styles.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Does the visualization support historical comprehension?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes effective visual aids such as interactive maps showing territorial changes, timelines of events, historical photographs/illustrations, or data visualizations of historical trends. Visuals should clarify complex historical concepts rather than just decorate. Deduct 5 points for inaccurate historical visuals, 3 points for poor visual hierarchy that obscures historical relationships. Full score for visualizations that genuinely enhance understanding of historical cause and effect.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as incorrect user input, browser compatibility issues, responsive design challenges, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. AR/VR components for historical immersion 2. Voice narration with historical context 3. Adaptive learning paths based on user performance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple quiz systems with different mechanics) 2. Function modules unrelated to history education (e.g., mini-games without historical context) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that distract from learning). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core educational functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating educational content/game mechanics/UI layers), maintainability for content updates, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no consideration is given to loading performance for educational resources. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational design principles: 1) Age-appropriate visuals for 8th graders 2) Proper information hierarchy highlighting key historical concepts 3) Consistent design language that aids navigation through historical periods. Deduct 3 points for each visually overwhelming screen, 5 points for inappropriate visual metaphors for historical events, and 5 points for text-heavy interfaces without proper visual support. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and pedagogically sound?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the interactions support the learning process: 1) Clear feedback on correct/incorrect historical knowledge 2) Progressive disclosure of complex historical concepts 3) Intuitive navigation between related historical events. Deduct 5 points for each learning interaction without feedback, 3 points for transitions that break the historical narrative flow, and 5 points for interactivity that prioritizes entertainment over educational value. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/genshin-impact-html-webpage.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1638,
+  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you produce is executable for demonstration. Create an HTML webpage about Genshin Impact.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the core Genshin Impact content accurately represented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the HTML page includes essential Genshin Impact elements: main characters, regions, game mechanics, and lore. Score 0 if barely recognizable as Genshin Impact, 5 if only basic elements are present, and 10 if comprehensive content (characters, elements, weapons systems, regions) is included with accurate details.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the visual design consistent with Genshin Impact's aesthetic?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the color scheme, typography, and design elements match the game's distinct visual style. Check for Genshin's characteristic fantasy elements, elemental colors, and the distinctive UI patterns. Deduct 5 points if the color scheme contradicts the game's palette, 3 points if fonts don't reflect the game's style, and 5 points if no game-specific visual elements are incorporated.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is interactive content related to the game implemented?",
+      "description": "Check for interactive elements like character profiles, element switchers, or wish simulators. Score 0 if no interactivity exists, 5 if basic hover/click interactions are implemented, and 10 if complex game-related interactions (e.g., character showcase with animations, interactive map, or element reaction demonstrations) are fully functional.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is responsive design properly implemented for multiple devices?",
+      "description": "Assess if the page displays correctly across desktop, tablet, and mobile devices using media queries. Check if images are optimized for different screen sizes and if interactive elements remain functional on touch devices. Deduct 5 points if the layout breaks on mobile, 3 points if images aren't responsive, and 5 points if interactive elements are unusable on certain devices.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as image loading failures, JavaScript errors, user input validation) and provide fallbacks or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Element reaction animations 2. Background music toggle with game soundtracks 3. Dynamic time-of-day changes like in-game). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple navigation systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to Genshin Impact 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core content is interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating content/style/behavior with proper HTML/CSS/JS organization), code readability, and resource optimization. Deduct 5 points if inline styles are overused; deduct 5 points if JavaScript is unstructured or mixed with HTML; deduct 5 points if assets are not optimized for web delivery. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern web design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching consistent with Genshin's palette 2) Proper layout spacing with clear visual hierarchy 3) Professional font system that maintains readability while reflecting the game's aesthetic. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for conflicting color combinations, and 5 points for disorganized content structure. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animations controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual cues for interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for janky animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/high-school-english-word-memorization-system.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1369,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration. Please design a word memorization system (similar to the Dingxiao Word Memorization System) using the vocabulary from the People's Education Press high school English curriculum, with adjustable daily learning quantities. The memorization system should first display English words and their Chinese meanings, then have students choose the correct Chinese meaning for given English words, followed by showing incomplete English words for students to complete, and finally presenting misspelled words again for correction. This pattern should repeat over subsequent days until all high school English vocabulary has been memorized. Please generate this word memorization system immediately.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the word database comprehensive and properly structured?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a complete database of PEP high school English vocabulary with proper data structure (words, definitions, example sentences, difficulty levels, etc.). Check if the vocabulary is organized by units/lessons and if metadata includes part of speech and phonetic symbols. Score 0 if only placeholder words are used, 5 if basic word structure is implemented but incomplete, and 10 if a comprehensive dictionary with proper organization is included.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the spaced repetition algorithm properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes a scientifically-based spaced repetition system (SRS) that schedules word reviews at optimal intervals. The algorithm should track user performance and adjust review frequency accordingly (similar to SM-2 algorithm or Leitner system). Deduct 5 points if words appear in fixed intervals regardless of mastery level, and 3 points if there's no decay factor for long-term memory. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Are all required memorization modes implemented?",
+      "description": "Verify that all specified learning modes are implemented: (1) word+meaning display, (2) meaning recognition quiz, (3) word completion exercise, (4) misspelling correction. Each mode should have proper input validation and scoring. Score 0 if less than two modes are implemented, 5 if basic modes exist but are incomplete, and 10 if all required modes work as specified with proper transitions between them.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the learning progress tracking system complete?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the system properly tracks user progress including: daily learning statistics, mastery level per word, cumulative progress through the curriculum, and history of performance. The system should provide persistence (local storage or server-side) to maintain progress between sessions. Deduct 5 points if progress isn't saved between sessions, and 3 points if statistics aren't granular enough for meaningful feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid user inputs, unexpected data formats, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should handle edge cases like empty word lists or interrupted sessions. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for basic validation, and 0 points if errors cause system crashes.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Audio pronunciation of words 2. Visual mnemonics for difficult words 3. Gamification elements like streaks/achievements 4. Word etymology information). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple progress tracking systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary memorization (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations during word display). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/business logic/view layers), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear organization of vocabulary data management. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Quiz feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition between learning modes is smooth (300-500ms) 3) Clear visual guidance during different learning phases. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between learning modes, and 5 points for unintuitive word completion interfaces. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/high-school-physics-knowledge-summary.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1072,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. High School Physics Knowledge Summary (People's Education Version)\n\nYou are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure that the generated code is executable and displayable.\n\n---\n\n### I. Mechanics\n\n#### 1. Kinematics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Displacement**: Change in position of an object, a vector with both magnitude and direction.\n  - **Velocity**: Physical quantity describing the speed and direction of motion, a vector.\n  - **Acceleration**: Physical quantity describing the rate of change in velocity, a vector.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Uniform Linear Motion: \\( v = \\frac{s}{t} \\)\n  - Uniformly Accelerated Linear Motion:\n    - Velocity Formula: \\( v = v_0 + at \\)\n    - Displacement Formula: \\( s = v_0t + \\frac{1}{2}at^2 \\)\n    - Velocity-Displacement Relationship: \\( v^2 - v_0^2 = 2as \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Average velocity in uniformly accelerated linear motion: \\( \\bar{v} = \\frac{v_0 + v}{2} \\)\n  - Displacement difference in consecutive equal time intervals: \\( \\Delta s = aT^2 \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - In uniformly accelerated linear motion, acceleration is constant, velocity and displacement change linearly with time.\n  - The velocity-displacement relationship formula is commonly used when initial velocity and acceleration are known to find displacement.\n\n#### 2. Newton's Laws\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Force**: Interaction between objects, a vector.\n  - **Inertia**: Property of an object to maintain its state of motion.\n  - **Action and Reaction Forces**: Equal in magnitude, opposite in direction, acting on different objects.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Newton's Second Law: \\( F = ma \\)\n  - Universal Gravitation Law: \\( F = G\\frac{Mm}{r^2} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Acceleration of an object on an inclined plane: \\( a = g\\sin\\theta \\)\n  - Period of a spring oscillator: \\( T = 2\\pi\\sqrt{\\frac{m}{k}} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Newton's Second Law reveals the relationship between force and acceleration, the foundation of dynamics.\n  - The Universal Gravitation Law applies to any two objects with mass, explaining celestial motion.\n\n#### 3. Energy Conservation\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Kinetic Energy**: Energy possessed by an object due to motion, \\( E_k = \\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \\).\n  - **Potential Energy**: Energy possessed by an object due to position or state, e.g., gravitational potential energy \\( E_p = mgh \\).\n  - **Conservation of Mechanical Energy**: In situations where only gravity or elastic forces do work, mechanical energy remains constant.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Work-Energy Theorem: \\( W = \\Delta E_k = \\frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 \\)\n  - Conservation of Mechanical Energy: \\( E_k + E_p = \\text{constant} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Final velocity of an object sliding down from rest on an inclined plane: \\( v = \\sqrt{2gh} \\)\n  - Conservation of momentum in elastic collisions: \\( m_1v_1 + m_2v_2 = m_1v_1' + m_2v_2' \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The Work-Energy Theorem reveals the relationship between work and energy change.\n  - The Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy is an important tool for solving mechanics problems.\n\n---\n\n### II. Electromagnetism\n\n#### 1. Electrostatic Field\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Electric Field Intensity**: Physical quantity describing the strength of an electric field, \\( E = \\frac{F}{q} \\).\n  - **Potential Difference**: Difference in electric potential between two points in an electric field, \\( U = Ed \\).\n  - **Coulomb's Law**: Law describing the force between point charges.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Electric Field Intensity: \\( E = \\frac{F}{q} \\)\n  - Potential Difference: \\( U = Ed \\)\n  - Coulomb's Law: \\( F = k\\frac{q_1q_2}{r^2} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Electric field intensity of a point charge: \\( E = k\\frac{Q}{r^2} \\)\n  - Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor: \\( C = \\frac{\\varepsilon S}{4\\pi kd} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Electric field intensity is a fundamental physical quantity describing electric field properties.\n  - Potential difference reflects energy changes in an electric field.\n\n#### 2. Steady Current\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Electric Current**: Amount of charge passing through a conductor cross-section per unit time, \\( I = \\frac{Q}{t} \\).\n  - **Resistance**: The obstruction of a conductor to electric current, \\( R = \\frac{U}{I} \\).\n  - **Electric Power**: Rate at which work is done by electric current, \\( P = UI \\).\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Ohm's Law: \\( I = \\frac{U}{R} \\)\n  - Electric Power: \\( P = UI = I^2R = \\frac{U^2}{R} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Total resistance in series circuits: \\( R = R_1 + R_2 + \\cdots + R_n \\)\n  - Total resistance in parallel circuits: \\( \\frac{1}{R} = \\frac{1}{R_1} + \\frac{1}{R_2} + \\cdots + \\frac{1}{R_n} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Ohm's Law is the basis for circuit analysis.\n  - Electric power reflects the efficiency of energy conversion in circuits.\n\n#### 3. Magnetic Field\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Magnetic Induction**: Physical quantity describing the strength of a magnetic field, \\( B = \\frac{F}{IL} \\).\n  - **Ampere Force**: Force exerted on a current-carrying conductor in a magnetic field, \\( F = BIL\\sin\\theta \\).\n  - **Lorentz Force**: Force exerted on a charged particle in a magnetic field, \\( F = qvB\\sin\\theta \\).\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Ampere Force: \\( F = BIL\\sin\\theta \\)\n  - Lorentz Force: \\( F = qvB\\sin\\theta \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Radius of motion for a charged particle in a magnetic field: \\( r = \\frac{mv}{qB} \\)\n  - Effective value of alternating current: \\( I_{\\text{effective}} = \\frac{I_m}{\\sqrt{2}} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Ampere Force and Lorentz Force are important concepts in electromagnetism.\n  - The laws of motion for charged particles in magnetic fields are fundamental to particle accelerator research.\n\n---\n\n### III. Thermodynamics\n\n#### 1. Laws of Thermodynamics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Internal Energy**: Total kinetic and potential energy of molecules within an object.\n  - **First Law of Thermodynamics**: Expression of the law of energy conservation in thermodynamics.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - First Law of Thermodynamics: \\( \\Delta U = Q + W \\)\n  - Ideal Gas Law: \\( PV = nRT \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Work in isothermal processes: \\( W = nRT\\ln\\frac{V_2}{V_1} \\)\n  - Temperature change in adiabatic processes: \\( T_1V_1^{\\gamma-1} = T_2V_2^{\\gamma-1} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The First Law of Thermodynamics reveals basic principles of energy conversion.\n  - The Ideal Gas Law is an important tool for studying gas properties.\n\n#### 2. Heat Transfer\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Heat Conduction**: Heat transfer through molecular motion within a substance.\n  - **Thermal Radiation**: Heat transfer through electromagnetic waves.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Heat Conduction: \\( Q = kA\\frac{\\Delta T}{d} \\)\n  - Thermal Radiation: \\( P = \\sigma A T^4 \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Peak wavelength of blackbody radiation: \\( \\lambda_{\\text{max}} = \\frac{b}{T} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Heat conduction and thermal radiation are two main methods of heat transfer.\n  - Blackbody radiation laws are the basis for studying thermal radiation.\n\n---\n\n### IV. Optics\n\n#### 1. Geometric Optics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Law of Refraction**: Law governing light refraction at interfaces between two media.\n  - **Thin Lens Formula**: Formula describing image formation by lenses.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Law of Refraction: \\( n_1\\sin\\theta_1 = n_2\\sin\\theta_2 \\)\n  - Thin Lens Formula: \\( \\frac{1}{f} = \\frac{1}{u} + \\frac{1}{v} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Critical angle for total internal reflection: \\( \\sin\\theta_c = \\frac{n_2}{n_1} \\)\n  - Spacing of light interference fringes: \\( \\Delta x = \\frac{\\lambda D}{d} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The Law of Refraction is the basis for studying light propagation.\n  - The Thin Lens Formula is an important tool for analyzing lens imaging.\n\n#### 2. Wave Optics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Interference**: Light and dark fringes produced by the superposition of two coherent light waves.\n  - **Diffraction**: Wave phenomenon occurring when light passes through narrow slits or obstacles.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Conditions for light interference: \\( \\Delta r = k\\lambda \\) (constructive), \\( \\Delta r = (k + \\frac{1}{2})\\lambda \\) (destructive)\n  - Light diffraction formula: \\( a\\sin\\theta = k\\lambda \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Position of dark fringes in single-slit diffraction: \\( a\\sin\\theta = k\\lambda \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Interference and diffraction are important manifestations of light's wave nature.\n  - Interference patterns and diffraction patterns are important means to study the wave properties of light.\n\n---\n\n### V. Modern Physics\n\n#### 1. Quantum Mechanics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Photoelectric Effect**: Phenomenon of electron emission when light hits a metal surface.\n  - **De Broglie Wavelength**: Relationship between matter wave wavelength and momentum.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Photoelectric Effect: \\( E_k = h\\nu - W \\)\n  - De Broglie Wavelength: \\( \\lambda = \\frac{h}{p} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Hydrogen atom energy level formula: \\( E_n = -\\frac{13.6}{n^2} \\text{eV} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The photoelectric effect reveals the particle nature of light.\n  - De Broglie wavelength is the basis for studying the wave nature of matter.\n\n#### 2. Relativity\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Mass-Energy Equation**: Equivalence relationship between mass and energy.\n  - **Time Dilation**: Phenomenon of moving clocks slowing down.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Mass-Energy Equation: \\( E = mc^2 \\)\n  - Time Dilation: \\( \\Delta t' = \\gamma\\Delta t \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Energy-momentum relationship in relativity: \\( E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m_0c^2)^2 \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The mass-energy equation reveals the intrinsic connection between mass and energy.\n  - Time dilation is one of the important effects of relativity.\n\n---\n\n### Summary\nThe above is a detailed summary of high school physics knowledge points from the People's Education Version, covering mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, optics, and modern physics. Each knowledge point includes formulas, secondary conclusions, and understanding of important concepts to help comprehensively master physics knowledge. If further organization into code or graphical representation is needed, it can be extended based on this foundation.\n\nCan you make this into a webpage?",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the webpage structure correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the HTML structure follows proper semantic hierarchy with appropriate heading levels (h1, h2, h3), section divisions, and navigation. The structure should organize the physics content logically by main categories (Mechanics, Electromagnetism, Thermodynamics, Optics, Modern Physics) and their subcategories. Score 0 if there's no clear structure, 5 if basic structure exists but with semantic errors, 10 if fully and correctly implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Are mathematical formulas properly rendered?",
+      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of mathematical formulas. Physics formulas should be correctly rendered using MathJax/KaTeX or equivalent libraries, maintaining proper notation, symbols, and layout. Check if formulas like Newton's laws, energy equations, electromagnetic principles are displayed with proper subscripts, superscripts, and special symbols. Deduct 2 points for each incorrectly rendered formula type, with complete failure scoring 0 and perfect implementation scoring 10.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is interactive physics visualization implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code includes interactive visualizations for key physics concepts (e.g., projectile motion, electrical circuits, wave interference). Each major section should have at least one interactive demonstration. Score 3 points per quality interactive visualization (up to 10 points). Visualizations should accurately represent the physics concepts, be manipulable by users, and provide educational value. No visualizations score 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Does the implementation include a knowledge mapping system?",
+      "description": "Examine whether the code implements a visual knowledge mapping system that shows relationships between physics concepts (e.g., how Newton's laws relate to energy conservation, or how wave-particle duality connects quantum mechanics and optics). Score 0 if absent, 5 if a basic concept map exists but lacks interactivity or comprehensive coverage, and 10 if the implementation includes an interactive, comprehensive knowledge map with clear relationship indicators.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (browser compatibility issues, slow loading of mathematical rendering libraries, device-specific display problems) and provide fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Interactive quizzes tied to formula comprehension 2. Physics formula calculator tools 3. Historical context sidebars for physics discoveries 4. Animated examples of physical phenomena). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate explanations of the same concept in multiple sections 2. Excessive animations that don't contribute to understanding physics concepts 3. Unnecessary script libraries that slow down page loading. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core content is obscured by redundant elements.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (separation of content/presentation/behavior layers), code reusability for similar physics sections, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global script variables pollute the namespace; deduct 5 points if similar physics formulas use completely different rendering approaches; deduct 5 points if the page loading time exceeds 3 seconds due to inefficient code. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme appropriate for scientific content 2) Proper white space and content density 3) Professional typography with clear hierarchy (formula text vs. explanatory text). Deduct 3 points for each visual inconsistency between sections, 5 points for poor readability of formulas, and 5 points for lack of visual distinction between physics concept categories. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements conform to good UX principles: 1) Responsive formula rendering (≤ 500ms) 2) Smooth transitions between physics topic sections 3) Clear visual indication of interactive vs. static elements. Deduct 5 points if formula interactions have noticeable lag, 3 points if navigation between physics sections is jarring, and 5 points if users would struggle to identify which elements are interactive. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/historical-random-roll-call-system-web.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1737,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. I am a history teacher and want to conduct random roll calls in class. Please design a roll call system with a strong historical feel that can run as a webpage on any system. However, I'm not sure how to write clearer prompts.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the core roll call functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Check if the system implements basic roll call features such as student roster management, random selection mechanism, and attendance tracking. The code should allow adding/removing students, conducting random selections, and recording attendance status (present/absent). Score 0 if the selection logic is missing, 5 if only basic random selection is implemented, and 10 if the system includes comprehensive roll call management.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the historical theme appropriately implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate how well the historical theme is integrated into the design. Check for period-appropriate visual elements (such as parchment backgrounds, historical fonts, themed icons), historically inspired terminology, and thematic animations or transitions. Deduct 5 points if historical elements are merely superficial, 3 points if the theme is inconsistent. Score 10 points for an immersive historical experience that enhances rather than hinders functionality.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the data persistence mechanism implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the system can save and retrieve roll call data between sessions. Check if local storage, IndexedDB, or another client-side storage solution is utilized to maintain student rosters, attendance records, and historical data. Deduct 5 points if only in-memory storage is used, 3 points if data persistence is partial. The full score is 10 points for comprehensive data management with backup/restore capabilities.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the system easily usable without technical expertise?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the interface is intuitive enough for a history teacher with minimal technical background. Check if operations like adding students, conducting roll calls, and viewing records can be performed without consulting documentation. Deduct 5 points if critical functions require coding knowledge, 3 points if the workflow is unintuitive. Give 10 points if the system provides clear guidance and is immediately usable.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty student lists, duplicate names, invalid inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Historical facts displayed during roll call 2. Period-appropriate sound effects 3. Themed animations when selecting students). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to select random students) 2. Function modules unrelated to roll call (e.g., a built-in quiz game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/data/logic layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if design patterns are not used appropriately; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles while maintaining historical authenticity: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-chip-performance-comparison-webpage.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 218,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. Help me create an HTML webpage that compares chip performance.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the chip performance comparison functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the HTML/JavaScript code correctly implements a comprehensive comparison system for chip performance, including proper data visualization and comparison metrics (such as CPU benchmarks, GPU scores, memory bandwidth, power consumption). Score 0 if no comparison functionality exists, 5 points if only basic metrics are shown, 10 points if multiple sophisticated comparison metrics are implemented with proper visualization.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the data visualization component properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of charts and graphs (bar charts, radar charts, line graphs, etc.) for comparing chip performance. Check if appropriate visualization libraries (D3.js, Chart.js, Highcharts, etc.) are utilized effectively. Award 10 points for interactive, responsive visualizations with appropriate scales and legends; 5 points for static but accurate visualizations; 0 points if visualizations are missing or misleading.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the data source management properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check if the solution includes a proper data loading mechanism (AJAX calls, fetch API, or static data arrays), data filtering options, and the ability to update/refresh data. Deduct 5 points if there's no way to update or filter data, 3 points if the data structure is inefficient for the comparison task. Full score for a flexible data management system that can accommodate various chip types and metrics.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is user interaction for comparison selection implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether users can select specific chips to compare, toggle between different metrics, customize the comparison view, and save/export comparison results. Deduct 5 points if chip selection is inflexible, 3 points if metric toggling is missing, and 3 points if there are no export/save capabilities. Award full points for an intuitive, comprehensive comparison UI.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common edge cases (no data, incomplete data, unexpected data types, browser compatibility issues). Check if proper error handling exists with user-friendly error messages. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle these cases, scoring 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exception handling exists, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check for surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Side-by-side animated comparison of thermal performance 2. Price-to-performance ratio calculator 3. Interactive historical performance trend visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple chart libraries doing the same thing) 2. Function modules unrelated to chip comparison (e.g., unnecessary social media features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (excessive animations that slow rendering). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data management/visualization/UI components), code organization, and optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high; deduct 5 points if no performance optimizations are implemented for handling large datasets. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme that differentiates chips clearly 2) Proper information hierarchy with primary metrics emphasized 3) Responsive layout that works on different screen sizes. Deduct 3 points for cluttered visualization, 5 points for poor color differentiation making comparisons difficult, and 5 points for non-responsive designs. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge the quality of interactive elements: 1) Quick response time when selecting chips to compare (≤100ms) 2) Smooth transitions when toggling between different metrics or views (300-500ms) 3) Intuitive tooltips or information panels for detailed chip specifications. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without visual feedback, 3 points for jerky transitions between comparison views, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-cooking-class-attendance-function.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1797,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the generated code is executable for display. Help me design an HTML webpage that can implement the attendance function for Cooking Class 1, with the following student list: Yang Xinyi, Huang Siyan, Pan Yueyu, Qian Yisheng, Hu Renying, Wei Yuqi, Wang Feier, Tang Jingyi, Han Yichen, Lu Yijing, Su Luyi, Jiang Liyan, Jiang Yawen, Lin Yichen, Liang Yutong, Ren Ke, Liu Xinwan, Yuan Jingying, Wu Songtao, Zheng Yi, Qu Anjie, Li Yifei, Zhang Cuiyan, Yang Ruixi, Zhu Zhipeng, Yang Jin, Gong Yunxi, Shen Yanbin, Wang Ao, Liao Rui",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the basic attendance function fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the core attendance recording functionality. Check if it includes: 1) Complete student list display 2) Status tracking (present/absent/late) 3) Date selection 4) Save/update mechanism. Score 0 if core functionality is missing, 5 if basic attendance marking is implemented but lacks data persistence, and 10 if complete with data storage and retrieval capability.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the student data management system properly structured?",
+      "description": "Evaluate how student data is organized and managed. The student list should be loaded dynamically (not hard-coded in HTML), properly formatted, and stored efficiently. Check whether alphabetical sorting or search functionality is implemented. Deduct 3 points if data is hard-coded in HTML elements, 3 points if there's no data validation, and 2 points if student names aren't properly displayed or formatted. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Does the attendance tracking include essential features for a classroom setting?",
+      "description": "Examine whether the system includes practical features needed for a cooking class environment: 1) Timestamp recording 2) Attendance statistics (percentage/summary) 3) Status differentiation (e.g., excused/unexcused absences) 4) Class date management. Deduct 2 points for each missing essential feature. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the data persistence mechanism appropriate for the application?",
+      "description": "Assess how attendance records are stored and retrieved. Check for: 1) Local storage implementation 2) Data export functionality (CSV/PDF) 3) Data integrity protection. Attendance data should persist between sessions. Deduct 5 points if there's no persistence mechanism, 3 points if data can be easily corrupted or lost, and 2 points if there's no export functionality. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as duplicate entries, browser refresh, accidental deletions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Automatic absence notifications 2. Attendance trends visualization 3. QR code check-in option 4. Voice command recognition for marking attendance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to mark attendance) 2. Function modules unrelated to attendance tracking (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code organization, and reusability. Deduct 5 points if global variables are excessively used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for attendance marking. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy interactions when marking multiple students, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}