@getollie/cli 0.0.1

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-cloud-printing-mini-program.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1558,
+  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Create a WeChat cloud printing mini-program interface code.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat mini-program page structure correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly implements the WeChat mini-program page structure (WXML, WXSS, JS) following WeChat's development standards. Check if the app.json, app.wxss, and necessary pages are defined. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if only partial implementation exists, and 10 if the complete structure with proper configuration is implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the cloud printing core functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess if the code implements essential cloud printing functions: file upload, printer selection, print parameters configuration (color/B&W, copies, paper size, etc.), and print job submission. Deduct 3 points for each missing core function. Give 10 points only if the complete printing workflow is implemented with proper error handling.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Does the implementation include WeChat's authorization and cloud capabilities?",
+      "description": "Check if the code correctly integrates WeChat's login authorization, file management APIs, and cloud functions/database for storing printing tasks. Verify if the implementation follows WeChat's security best practices. Deduct 5 points if user authorization is missing, and 5 points if cloud storage integration is incomplete or insecure.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the print job management system implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes a complete print job management system with status tracking (queued, printing, completed, failed), history viewing, and cancellation features. Check if job notifications are implemented. Score 0 if job management is absent, 5 if basic tracking exists, and 10 if comprehensive management with all features is implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as upload failures, network interruptions, authorization rejections) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Print preview functionality 2. OCR text extraction from images 3. Document format conversion 4. Location-based nearest printer recommendation). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple file upload methods with overlapping functionality) 2. Function modules unrelated to cloud printing (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Excessive animations or effects that affect performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating service/UI/state management layers), component reusability, and adherence to WeChat Mini-Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if WeChat lifecycle hooks are misused. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat's design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing and component sizing 3) Professional typography hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat design standards, 5 points for inconsistent visual styles, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat mini-program performance standards: 1) Page loading time ≤ 300ms 2) Smooth transitions between major functions 3) Clear loading states during network operations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-like-chat-tool-with-admin-backend.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1087,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable whenever possible. Write an online chat tool similar to WeChat that supports one-to-one and one-to-many conversations, and includes an administrative backend.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the basic chat functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements core chat features including message sending/receiving, chat history loading, and read status tracking. Check if the messaging system handles text messages, emojis, and media attachments. Score 0 if messaging doesn't work, 5 if only basic text messaging is implemented, and 10 if all expected chat features (including typing indicators and read receipts) are fully functional.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Are one-to-one and group chat features properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly handles both private and group conversations with appropriate data structures and UI differentiation. Check if group chats include member management, admin controls, and proper message broadcasting. Deduct 5 points if group chat lacks member management features, 3 points if chat history doesn't properly separate by conversation type. Full score requires both chat types to be fully functional with proper conversation switching.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the administrative backend complete and functional?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the admin panel includes user management (add/edit/delete/ban), content moderation tools, analytics dashboard, and system configuration options. Check for role-based access control and audit logging. Deduct 5 points if user management is incomplete, 3 points if content moderation tools are missing, and 5 points if there's no proper authentication for admin access. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is real-time communication properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code implements WebSockets or a similar technology for real-time message delivery with proper connection management. Evaluate if the implementation includes connection state handling, reconnection logic, and message queuing during disconnections. Deduct 5 points if there's no offline message handling, 3 points if there's no typing indicator, and 5 points if message delivery isn't truly real-time. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruptions, server errors, invalid inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include proper error handling, input validation, and recovery mechanisms, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. End-to-end encryption 2. Interactive message reactions 3. Smart message prioritization 4. AI chatbot integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple notification systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to messaging (e.g., complex games embedded in chat) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/data layers), code reusability, documentation, and testing coverage. Deduct 5 points if global state management is messy or architectural patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there are no tests or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern messaging app principles: 1) Clean and consistent chat bubbles 2) Clear visual hierarchy between conversations and messages 3) Professional typography and spacing (message text ≥ 14px, adequate whitespace). Deduct 3 points for cluttered conversation lists, 5 points for poor contrast or readability issues, and 5 points for inconsistent visual styling between screens. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to user expectations for a modern chat application: 1) Message sending feedback ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth scrolling through chat history 3) Intuitive navigation between conversations. Deduct 5 points for laggy message sending, 3 points for jerky animations during conversation switching, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "hard"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-framework-profile-orders-settings.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 964,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Create a WeChat Mini Program with one large framework containing three smaller frameworks. The first framework includes a profile picture and nickname. The second framework contains three small icons: Received, To Be Received, and All Orders. The third framework includes Personal Information, Shipping Address, and Feedback.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the three-framework structure correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Verify if the code establishes a clear layout with one large container framework properly divided into three distinct sections with appropriate styling and responsive behavior. Check if the frameworks are built using appropriate WXML structure with proper styling. Score 0 if the three-framework structure is missing, 5 if implemented with basic styling, 10 if fully responsive with proper hierarchical relationship.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the first framework with profile picture and nickname properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Examine if the profile section includes proper image component for avatar display with appropriate sizing and borders, nickname text with proper styling, and user information retrieval from WeChat APIs (wx.getUserInfo or equivalent). Check if the avatar handles loading errors and defaults. Deduct 3 points if avatar placeholder is missing, 3 points if the nickname styling is inadequate, and 4 points if no WeChat API integration is attempted. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the second framework with three order status icons properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the order status section includes three well-defined, equally-spaced icons with appropriate labels (Received, To Be Received, All Orders), proper visual indication of current selection status, and navigation functionality. Check if the icons have proper tap event bindings to navigate to respective order lists. Score 0 if icons are missing, 5 if basic implementation without proper event handling, 10 if fully functional with appropriate visual feedback on tap.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the third framework with user functions properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check if the user function framework properly implements Personal Information, Shipping Address, and Feedback options with appropriate icons, text labels, and navigation indicators (like right arrows). Verify if each option has event bindings to navigate to respective pages. Deduct 3 points for each missing function, 2 points if navigation indicators are absent, and 2 points if the styling is inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing user information, permission denials, network issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Custom animations for transitions 2. Dynamic theme customization 3. Smart recommendations based on order history). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to access the same page) 2. Function modules unrelated to user profile (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/logic/data layers), component reusability, and proper use of WeChat Mini Program lifecycle methods. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic or missing; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if app.json and page.json configurations are improper. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography (font sizes between 12-20px, appropriate line height). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for non-WeChat style UI components, and 5 points for chaotic information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animations controlled between 200-400ms 3) Clear visual state changes for interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without feedback, 3 points for janky animations, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation flows. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-my-page-login.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1319,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Help me create the source code for a \"My Page\" (including user login functionality) for a scenic spot ticket-purchasing WeChat Mini Program developed using WeChat Developer Tools, and beautify the page design.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program user login system fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code correctly implements WeChat Mini Program's authorization login process, including wx.getUserProfile(), wx.login(), and backend session_key validation. Check if user information storage and status management are properly handled. Score 0 if core login logic is missing, 5 if only basic login is implemented without proper error handling, and 10 if complete WeChat authorization flow with session management is fully implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the \"My Page\" user interface comprehensively designed?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the My Page includes essential user center features: user avatar/nickname display, order history, ticket collection, personal settings, and logout functionality. Check if the page structure follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines. Deduct 3 points for each missing core module, 5 points if navigation structure is unclear. Full score requires complete user center ecosystem.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the scenic spot ticket purchasing integration properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the My Page seamlessly integrates with ticket purchasing features, including order status display, ticket usage records, refund/exchange options, and QR code ticket display. Evaluate if the data flow between user operations and ticket management is correctly handled. Deduct 5 points if order management is incomplete, 3 points if ticket status updates are not real-time.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program lifecycle and API usage correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code properly handles WeChat Mini Program lifecycle events (onLoad, onShow, onHide), uses appropriate APIs (wx.setStorageSync, wx.navigateTo, wx.showToast), and implements proper data binding with WXML/WXSS. Check if app.json and page.json configurations are complete. Deduct 5 points if lifecycle management is poor, 3 points if API usage is inefficient.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (network failure, login timeout, data loading errors, WeChat API call failures, etc.) and provide user-friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases and provide graceful degradation. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if average robustness, 0 points if no exception handling.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that enhance user experience?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes thoughtful features that improve user experience (e.g., 1. Smart recommendation based on visit history 2. Social sharing of scenic spot experiences 3. Offline ticket storage 4. Voice navigation integration 5. AR scenic spot preview). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user info storage methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to scenic spot ticketing (e.g., built-in games or unrelated e-commerce) 3. Excessive animations that affect Mini Program performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (proper separation of pages, components, and utils), code organization following WeChat Mini Program best practices, and reusable component structure. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or improper data flow management; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate exceeds 30%; deduct 3 points if file structure doesn't follow Mini Program conventions.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface design meet WeChat Mini Program and scenic spot industry standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows WeChat Design Guidelines and scenic spot app aesthetics: 1) Color scheme suitable for tourism industry (natural, trustworthy colors) 2) Proper use of WeChat UI components (van-weapp or similar) 3) Clear visual hierarchy with tourism-themed iconography 4) Responsive design for different screen sizes. Deduct 3 points for each design inconsistency, 5 points for poor color choices, 5 points for cluttered layout.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the user interaction smooth and follows WeChat Mini Program UX patterns?",
+      "description": "Judge whether interactions conform to WeChat Mini Program user expectations: 1) Page transitions using proper navigation APIs 2) Loading states with wx.showLoading() 3) Touch feedback following WeChat standards 4) Intuitive gesture support 5) Proper use of WeChat native components. Deduct 5 points for each non-standard interaction pattern, 3 points for slow page transitions, 5 points for unclear user flow navigation.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-photo-video-management.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 1717,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please utilize your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code demonstrations when possible. \n\n1. Code for a mini program that allows uploading photos and videos\n2. Code that enables categorizing and annotating photos and videos uploaded to the mini program, with capability to share them via WeChat while hiding certain key text information \n3. Specify the WeChat mini program",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat mini program photo/video upload functionality fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code properly implements the WeChat API for media upload, including proper handling of file formats (JPEG, PNG, MP4, etc.), size restrictions (maximum 10MB per file as per WeChat limits), and compression options. Check if the implementation handles both image and video preview before upload. Score 0 if core upload functionality is missing, 5 if only basic uploads work without proper feedback, and 10 if the implementation handles all file types with progress indicators and error handling.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the media categorization and annotation system comprehensively designed?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a robust categorization system (folder/album structure, tags, or both) and annotation capabilities (text overlays, descriptions, location data). Check if the system allows for searching/filtering based on categories and annotations. Deduct 5 points if the categorization is limited to only basic folders, 3 points if annotation capabilities are minimal. The full score is 10 points if a comprehensive system with multiple organization methods and rich annotation options is implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat sharing functionality properly implemented with information hiding?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code correctly implements the WeChat sharing mechanism using official APIs and properly handles the information hiding requirements. Verify if sensitive text can be selectively hidden when sharing while maintaining the visual integrity of the media. Deduct 5 points if sharing works but without information hiding capabilities, 3 points if the hiding mechanism is basic (e.g., simple blurring without options). Full score requires flexible control over what information is hidden and how it's masked when shared.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the mini program properly integrated with the WeChat ecosystem?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code properly utilizes WeChat's specific APIs and conventions, including login flow, user profile integration, permissions management, and adherence to WeChat's design guidelines. Check if the program leverages WeChat-specific capabilities like cloud storage and OpenID. Deduct 5 points if basic WeChat integration is missing, 3 points if only partial integration exists. Full score requires seamless integration with multiple WeChat platform features.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruptions, permission denials, invalid file types, large file uploads, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered auto-tagging of photos 2. Custom filters or effects for photos/videos 3. Batch processing capabilities 4. Timeline visualization of media). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple media pickers) 2. Function modules unrelated to media management (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations on every screen). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/API calls), component reusability, and configuration management. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if proper WeChat mini program patterns are not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no error logging or monitoring integration. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat's design guidelines and modern principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (following WeChat's palette) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a design that clashes with WeChat's aesthetic, and 5 points for chaotic media gallery layout. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Touch feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual cues during upload/processing. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy transitions when browsing media, and 5 points for confusing navigation between categories. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-psychological-counseling.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 857,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. I am a university student new to Java, and I need to create a one-on-one psychological counseling mini program. The main function is to assign volunteers to clients based on their needs and categories. Please provide complete code using only the WeChat Mini Program development tool. If backend integration is necessary, please provide the complete frontend code.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program foundation correctly set up?",
+      "description": "Check if the project structure follows WeChat Mini Program standards with app.js, app.json, app.wxss, and appropriate page folders. Verify the required configuration in app.json (including pages array, window settings, tabBar if needed). Deduct 5 points if core configuration files are missing, 3 points for incorrect structure. Score 0 if the code doesn't use WeChat Mini Program framework at all, 5 if basic structure exists but with issues, 10 if perfectly configured.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the client-volunteer matching system properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Evaluate if the matching algorithm considers client needs and volunteer categories. Check if there's logic for comparing client requirements with volunteer expertise, availability tracking, and conflict resolution. Deduct 5 points if matching is random without consideration of needs, 3 points if only basic category matching exists. Score 10 if the system includes sophisticated matching with priority handling and multiple matching criteria.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Are the user authentication and role management functionalities implemented?",
+      "description": "Check if the code differentiates between clients and volunteers with proper role-based access control. Verify if user registration, login using WeChat authentication, and profile management are implemented. Deduct 5 points if no role distinction exists, 3 points if roles exist but permissions aren't enforced. Score 10 if comprehensive user management with proper WeChat login integration is implemented.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the counseling session management fully functional?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code supports scheduling, session status tracking (pending/ongoing/completed), and feedback collection. Check if notifications for session changes are implemented. Deduct 5 points if scheduling is missing, 3 points if session status can't be tracked. Score 10 if the system handles the complete counseling lifecycle with reminders and feedback mechanisms.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, invalid inputs, edge cases in matching logic) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-assisted matching suggestions 2. In-app secure messaging for counseling 3. Mood tracking for clients with visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user management systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to counseling (e.g., a built-in game system) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/logic/API calls), use of component-based architecture, and proper state management practices in the Mini Program context. Deduct 5 points if global state is used inappropriately; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout using flex boxes and rpx units 3) Appropriate use of WeChat UI components. Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for poor responsive design, and 5 points for non-standard UI component implementations. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the interactions conform to Mini Program best practices: 1) Page transitions are smooth 2) Loading states are properly indicated 3) Form validation provides immediate feedback. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without loading indicators during network requests, 3 points for jarring page transitions, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "medium"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-registration-login-identity-verification.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 790,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable and can be demonstrated. Write WeChat Mini Program code for registration, login, and real identity verification. Identity verification methods: WeChat verification/Alipay verification source code.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program registration and login system fully implemented?",
+      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements WeChat Mini Program's wx.login() API integration, session key management, and user authorization flow. Check if it includes proper handling of openid/unionid acquisition, user profile binding, and secure token generation. Score 0 if core authentication logic is missing, 5 if only basic login is implemented, and 10 if complete registration/login flow with proper session management is included.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Is the WeChat identity verification mechanism properly integrated?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the WeChat real-name verification uses official APIs (wx.checkIsSupportSoterAuthentication, wx.startSoterAuthentication) or integrates with WeChat Pay real-name verification services. Check for proper certificate validation, biometric authentication handling, and secure data transmission. Deduct 5 points if verification result validation is missing, and 3 points if error handling for verification failures is inadequate. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the Alipay verification integration correctly implemented?",
+      "description": "Check whether the Alipay identity verification implements proper SDK integration or H5 redirection flow for real-name authentication. Evaluate if it includes certificate parsing, identity information validation, and secure callback handling. Verify that the implementation handles Alipay's authentication response properly and stores verification results securely. Deduct 5 points if callback verification is incomplete, and 5 points if cross-platform compatibility issues exist. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is comprehensive identity verification workflow and data security implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess whether the code includes complete identity verification lifecycle management: verification initiation, progress tracking, result validation, and certificate storage. Check for data encryption during transmission, secure local storage handling, and compliance with privacy regulations. Deduct 5 points if sensitive data is not encrypted, and 3 points if verification status synchronization is missing. Give 10 points if fully implemented with proper security measures.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network timeouts, API call failures, user cancellation, invalid certificates, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases including partial verification failures and retry mechanisms, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance user experience (e.g., 1. OCR-based ID card scanning 2. Face recognition integration 3. Multi-factor authentication options 4. Progressive verification levels 5. Verification status dashboard). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar authentication flows (e.g., multiple login validation logics coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to identity verification (e.g., built-in games or social features) 3. Excessive verification steps that hinder user experience (e.g., unnecessary multiple confirmations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core verification functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating authentication logic/UI components/API services), proper error handling, and Mini Program best practices compliance. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or component lifecycle is not properly managed; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if Mini Program performance optimization guidelines are not followed. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface design meet professional standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the UI design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat design language and color scheme 2) Proper form layout with clear input validation feedback 3) Professional typography with appropriate font sizes (≥28rpx for body text). Deduct 3 points for each confusing verification step UI, 5 points for inconsistent visual elements, and 5 points for poor form accessibility. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the verification flow smooth and user-friendly?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the verification process provides smooth user experience: 1) Clear progress indicators and step-by-step guidance 2) Immediate feedback for verification actions (≤100ms response) 3) Intuitive error messages and recovery options 4) Seamless transitions between verification methods. Deduct 5 points for each confusing verification step, 3 points for slow loading states, and 5 points for unclear error recovery paths. Full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "hard"
+}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-voice-form-component.json

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "index": 837,
+  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. Please help me create a feature in a WeChat Mini Program that allows filling out forms through voice input, structured as a component. The component's name should be \"Voice\" (as in the Chinese pinyin \"yuyin\"). Please write the code for all 4 files, using the \"simultaneous interpretation\" method we discussed earlier.",
+  "checklist": [
+    {
+      "id": 0,
+      "title": "Is the Voice component properly structured according to WeChat Mini Program standards?",
+      "description": "Check if the component follows the correct WXML, WXSS, JS, JSON structure with proper component declaration. The component should have a clear interface for integration. Verify that the component configuration in JSON properly registers the component with appropriate properties and options. Score 0 if missing essential files, 5 if basic structure exists but with issues, 10 if perfectly structured according to Mini Program best practices.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "title": "Does the voice input feature implement proper voice recognition and text conversion?",
+      "description": "Evaluate the use of WeChat Mini Program's voice recognition APIs (like wx.startRecord and wx.getRecorderManager). Check if the implementation handles permissions, recording states, and converts speech to text accurately. The component should show appropriate UI states during recording (indicating recording in progress). Deduct 5 points if permissions handling is missing, 3 points if recording state management is poor. Full score requires robust error handling for recognition failures.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "title": "Is the form integration functionality properly implemented?",
+      "description": "Assess how the converted text is integrated with form fields. The component should allow targeting specific form fields and inserting recognized text appropriately. Check if the component can handle different input types (text, number, etc.) and support both appending and replacing text modes. Deduct 5 points if field targeting is missing, 3 points if it doesn't handle different input types. Award 10 points for seamless integration with any form field.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "title": "Is the real-time feedback mechanism implemented during voice recording?",
+      "description": "Verify if the code includes visual and/or audio feedback during recording (animation, volume indication, transcription progress). Check if there's real-time text preview before final form submission. The solution should provide clear user feedback about recognition accuracy. Deduct 5 points for missing visual feedback, 3 points for no interim results display. Full score requires comprehensive user feedback during the entire voice input process.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "title": "Is the code robust?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as permission denial, network issues, recognition failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
+      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Noise cancellation 2. Multi-language support 3. Voice command shortcuts). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
+      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple recording initialization methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to voice input (e.g., unnecessary image processing) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
+      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/API calls), code reusability, and maintenance potential. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no documentation for component usage. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
+      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing following WeChat's spacing guidelines 3) Professional typography consistent with WeChat standards. Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for designs that clash with WeChat's style, and 5 points for accessibility issues. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
+      "description": "Judge whether the voice input interactions feel natural and intuitive: 1) Clear indication when recording starts/stops 2) Smooth transitions between recording states 3) Intuitive placement of recorded text in forms. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy transitions between states, and 5 points for confusing user flow. The full score is 10 points.",
+      "maxScore": 10
+    }
+  ],
+  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
+  "difficulty": "easy"
+}