@delorenj/pjangler 1.2.25 → 1.2.33

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-e/step-e-03-fix-validation.md

@@ -1,252 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-e-03-fix-validation'
-description: 'Systematically fix validation issues from validation report'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-e-05-apply-edit.md'
-editPlan: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{workflow_name}.md'
-targetWorkflowPath: '{targetWorkflowPath}'
-validationReport: '{targetWorkflowPath}/validation-report-{workflow_name}.md'
-
-# Standards References
-architecture: '../data/architecture.md'
-stepFileRules: '../data/step-file-rules.md'
-frontmatterStandards: '../data/frontmatter-standards.md'
-menuHandlingStandards: '../data/menu-handling-standards.md'
-outputFormatStandards: '../data/output-format-standards.md'
-stepTypePatterns: '../data/step-type-patterns.md'
----
-
-# Edit Step 3: Fix Validation Issues
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Systematically fix all issues identified in the validation report, working through each issue with user approval and loading relevant standards.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER make changes without user approval
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not an autonomous editor
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus on fixing validation issues systematically
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip issues or fix without approval
-- 💬 Explain each issue and proposed fix
-- 📋 Load relevant standards for each fix type
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Work through issues systematically
-- 💾 Document each fix in edit plan
-- 📖 Load appropriate standards for each issue type
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user approval for each fix
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Validation report provides list of issues
-- Edit plan documents fix goals
-- Focus: Fix each issue with standards adherence
-- This is systematic remediation, not creative editing
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip or shortcut.
-
-### 1. Read Context Files
-
-**Load these files first:**
-1. `{editPlan}` - Review fix goals
-2. `{validationReport}` - Get full list of issues
-
-### 2. Organize Issues by Type
-
-**From validation report, categorize issues:**
-
-| Issue Type | Standard File | Count |
-|------------|---------------|-------|
-| workflow.md violations | {architecture} | |
-| Step file structure | {stepFileRules} | |
-| Frontmatter issues | {frontmatterStandards} | |
-| Menu handling | {menuHandlingStandards} | |
-| Output format | {outputFormatStandards} | |
-| Step type issues | {stepTypePatterns} | |
-
-### 3. Work Through Issues Systematically
-
-**For EACH issue in order of severity (Critical → Warning):**
-
-#### A. Load Relevant Standard
-
-**Before proposing fix, load the relevant standard file:**
-- If workflow.md issue → Load {architecture}
-- If step file issue → Load {stepFileRules}
-- If frontmatter issue → Load {frontmatterStandards}
-- If menu issue → Load {menuHandlingStandards}
-- If output issue → Load {outputFormatStandards}
-- If step type issue → Load {stepTypePatterns}
-
-#### B. Explain the Issue
-
-"**Issue: [{issue type}] {file}:{location if applicable}**
-
-**What the validation found:**
-{Quote the validation finding}
-
-**Why this is a problem:**
-{Explain the impact based on the standard}
-
-**Standard reference:**
-{Cite the specific standard from the loaded file}"
-
-#### C. Propose Fix
-
-"**Proposed fix:**
-{Specific change needed}
-
-**This will:**
-- ✅ Fix the compliance issue
-- ✅ Align with: {specific standard}
-- ⚠️ Potential impact: {any side effects}
-
-**Should I apply this fix?**"
-
-#### D. Get User Approval
-
-Wait for user response:
-- **Yes/Y** - Apply the fix
-- **No/N** - Skip this issue (document why)
-- **Modify** - User suggests alternative approach
-- **Explain** - Provide more detail
-
-#### E. Apply Fix (If Approved)
-
-**Load the target file, make the change:**
-
-```markdown
-**Applying fix to: {file}**
-
-**Before:**
-{show relevant section}
-
-**After:**
-{show modified section}
-
-**Fix applied.** ✅"
-```
-
-**Update editPlan:**
-```markdown
-### Fixes Applied
-
-**[{issue type}]** {file}
-- ✅ Fixed: {description}
-- Standard: {standard reference}
-- User approved: Yes
-```
-
-### 4. Handle Skip/Modify Responses
-
-**IF user skips an issue:**
-
-"**Issue skipped.**
-
-Documenting in edit plan:
-- [{issue type}] {file} - SKIPPED per user request
-- Reason: {user's reason if provided}
-
-**Note:** This issue will remain in the validation report.
-
-Continue to next issue?"
-
-**IF user wants to modify the fix:**
-
-Discuss alternative approach, get agreement, then apply modified fix.
-
-### 5. After All Issues Complete
-
-**Present summary:**
-
-"**Validation Fix Summary:**
-
-**Total Issues Found:** {count}
-**Fixed:** {count}
-**Skipped:** {count}
-**Modified:** {count}
-
-**Remaining Issues:** {list any skipped or remaining warnings}
-
-**Files Modified:**
-- {file1}
-- {file2}
-- etc."
-
-### 6. Check for Direct Edit Goals
-
-**Load editPlan and check:**
-
-**IF edit plan includes direct change goals (beyond validation fixes):**
-
-"Your edit plan also includes direct changes. After we apply these validation fixes, we'll proceed to those changes."
-
-Update editPlan frontmatter:
-```yaml
-validationFixesComplete: true
-```
-
-Then route to {nextStepFile} for direct edits.
-
-**ELSE (no direct changes - validation fixes only):**
-
-"Validation fixes are complete! Would you like to:
-
-1. **[R]e-run validation** - Verify all fixes are working
-2. **[C]omplete** - Finish editing with these fixes
-3. **[M]ake additional changes** - Add more edits"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF R: Run validation workflow, then return to this step
-- IF C: Route to step-e-07-complete.md
-- IF M: Route to step-e-02-discover-edits.md
-- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
-
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS (If Proceeding)
-
-Display: "**Validation Fixes Applied. Select an Option:** [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF C: Update editPlan stepsCompleted, then load, read entirely, then execute appropriate next step
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN all validation issues are addressed (fixed, skipped, or documented) and user confirms, will you then route to the appropriate next step.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All issues presented to user systematically
-- Relevant standards loaded for each issue
-- User approval obtained for each fix
-- Fixes applied correctly
-- Edit plan updated with all changes
-- Files properly modified
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Skipping issues without user approval
-- Not loading relevant standards
-- Making changes without user confirmation
-- Not documenting fixes in edit plan
-- Applying fixes incorrectly
-
-**Master Rule:** Work through issues systematically. Load standards for each issue type. Get explicit approval before applying any fix.

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-e/step-e-04-direct-edit.md

@@ -1,275 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-e-04-direct-edit'
-description: 'Apply direct user-requested changes to workflow'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-e-05-apply-edit.md'
-editPlan: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{workflow_name}.md'
-targetWorkflowPath: '{targetWorkflowPath}'
-
-# Standards References
-architecture: '../data/architecture.md'
-stepFileRules: '../data/step-file-rules.md'
-frontmatterStandards: '../data/frontmatter-standards.md'
-menuHandlingStandards: '../data/menu-handling-standards.md'
-outputFormatStandards: '../data/output-format-standards.md'
-stepTypePatterns: '../data/step-type-patterns.md'
-workflowTypeCriteria: '../data/workflow-type-criteria.md'
-inputDiscoveryStandards: '../data/input-discovery-standards.md'
-csvDataFileStandards: '../data/csv-data-file-standards.md'
-intentVsPrescriptive: '../data/intent-vs-prescriptive-spectrum.md'
----
-
-# Edit Step 4: Direct Edit
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Apply direct user-requested changes to the workflow, loading relevant standards and checking for non-compliance during editing.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER make changes without user approval
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not an autonomous editor
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus on user-requested changes
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes without approval
-- 💬 Check for non-compliance while editing
-- 📋 Load relevant standards for each change type
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Work through each requested change
-- 💾 Document each change in edit plan
-- 📖 Load appropriate standards for each change type
-- 🚫 IF non-compliance found: offer to fix before proceeding
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Edit plan contains direct change goals
-- Focus: Apply user's requested changes
-- Must check for compliance issues during edits
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip or shortcut.
-
-### 1. Read Edit Plan
-
-**Load the editPlan:**
-Read `{editPlan}` to review direct change goals from step 2.
-
-### 2. For Each Direct Change Goal
-
-**Work through each change systematically:**
-
-#### A. Identify Change Type and Load Standards
-
-**For workflow.md changes:**
-- Load {architecture}
-
-**For step file changes:**
-- Load {stepFileRules}
-- Load {stepTypePatterns}
-- Load {intentVsPrescriptive}
-
-**For frontmatter changes:**
-- Load {frontmatterStandards}
-
-**For menu changes:**
-- Load {menuHandlingStandards}
-
-**For output/template changes:**
-- Load {outputFormatStandards}
-
-**For data file changes:**
-- Load {csvDataFileStandards}
-
-**For workflow type changes:**
-- Load {workflowTypeCriteria}
-
-**For discovery/input changes:**
-- Load {inputDiscoveryStandards}
-
-#### B. Load Target File and Check Compliance
-
-**Load the file to be edited and review against standards:**
-
-"**Loading: {filename}**
-**Standard: {standard file loaded}**
-
-**Checking file against standards before making your change...**"
-
-**IF NON-COMPLIANCE FOUND:**
-
-"**⚠️ Compliance Issue Detected**
-
-Before I apply your change, I noticed this file is not fully compliant with {standard}:
-
-**Issue:** {describe the non-compliance}
-
-**This could cause:** {explain impact}
-
-**Should I fix this compliance issue before applying your change?**
-
-1. **[F]ix first** - Fix compliance, then apply your change
-2. **[C]ontinue anyway** - Apply your change without fixing
-3. **[E]xplain more** - More details about the issue
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF F: Fix compliance first, then proceed to apply change
-- IF C: Document user accepted risk, proceed with change
-- IF E: Provide more details, then redisplay menu
-- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu"
-
-**IF COMPLIANT:**
-
-"**File is compliant.** Proceeding with your change."
-
-#### C. Present Current State and Proposed Change
-
-"**Current state of: {filename}**
-
-{show relevant section}
-
-**Your requested change:**
-{summarize the change from edit plan}
-
-**Proposed modification:**
-{show how the change will be made}
-
-**Should I apply this change?**"
-
-Wait for user approval.
-
-#### D. Apply Change (If Approved)
-
-**Load the file, make the change:**
-
-```markdown
-**Applying change to: {filename}**
-
-**Before:**
-{show relevant section}
-
-**After:**
-{show modified section}
-
-**Change applied.** ✅"
-```
-
-**Update editPlan:**
-```markdown
-### Direct Changes Applied
-
-**[{change type}]** {filename}
-- ✅ Changed: {description}
-- User approved: Yes
-- Compliance check: Passed/Fixed/Accepted risk
-```
-
-### 3. Handle Common Change Patterns
-
-#### Adding a New Step
-
-1. Load {stepFileRules}, {stepTypePatterns}, {intentVsPrescriptive}
-2. Check existing step numbering
-3. Determine appropriate step type
-4. Create step file with proper structure
-5. Update nextStepFile references in adjacent steps
-6. Verify menu handling compliance
-
-#### Removing a Step
-
-1. Load {architecture}
-2. Check if step is referenced by other steps
-3. Update nextStepFile in previous step
-4. Confirm with user about impact
-5. Remove step file
-6. Verify no broken references
-
-#### Modifying workflow.md
-
-1. Load {architecture}
-2. Check for progressive disclosure compliance (no step listings!)
-3. Update goal/role/routing as requested
-4. Ensure last section is routing
-5. Verify frontmatter completeness
-
-#### Adding/Modifying Data Files
-
-1. Load {csvDataFileStandards}
-2. Check file size (warn if >500 lines)
-3. Verify CSV format if applicable
-4. Ensure proper headers
-5. Update step frontmatter references
-
-#### Adding/Modifying Templates
-
-1. Load {outputFormatStandards}
-2. Determine template type
-3. Ensure variable consistency
-4. Update step frontmatter references
-
-### 4. After All Changes Complete
-
-**Present summary:**
-
-"**Direct Edit Summary:**
-
-**Total Changes Requested:** {count}
-**Applied:** {count}
-**Skipped:** {count}
-**Modified:** {count}
-
-**Compliance Issues Found During Editing:** {count}
-- Fixed: {count}
-- User accepted risk: {count}
-
-**Files Modified:**
-- {file1}
-- {file2}
-- etc."
-
-### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: "**Direct Edits Applied. Select an Option:** [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF C: Update editPlan stepsCompleted, then load, read entirely, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN all direct changes are applied (or documented) and user confirms, will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All requested changes presented to user
-- Relevant standards loaded for each change
-- Compliance checked before each change
-- User approval obtained for each change
-- Non-compliance found and offered fix
-- Changes applied correctly
-- Edit plan updated
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not loading relevant standards
-- Not checking compliance before editing
-- Making changes without user approval
-- Missing non-compliance issues
-- Not documenting changes
-
-**Master Rule:** Load standards for each change type. Check compliance BEFORE applying changes. Offer to fix non-compliance when found.

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-e/step-e-05-apply-edit.md

@@ -1,154 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-e-05-apply-edit'
-description: 'Offer validation after edits, complete or continue editing'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-e-06-validate-after.md'
-completeStep: './step-e-07-complete.md'
-editPlan: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{workflow_name}.md'
-targetWorkflowPath: '{targetWorkflowPath}'
-validationWorkflow: '../steps-v/step-01-validate.md'
----
-
-# Edit Step 5: Post-Edit Options
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Present options after edits are applied: run validation, make more edits, or complete.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not an autonomous editor
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus on next steps after edits
-- 💬 Present clear options
-- 🚪 Route based on user choice
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Present post-edit options
-- 💾 Update edit plan if needed
-- 📖 Route to appropriate next step
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Edits have been applied (validation fixes, direct changes, or both)
-- Focus: What's next?
-- This is a routing step
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip or shortcut.
-
-### 1. Read Edit Plan
-
-**Load the editPlan:**
-Read `{editPlan}` to understand what edits were applied.
-
-### 2. Present Edit Summary
-
-"**Edit Session Summary:**
-
-**Workflow:** {workflow_name}
-**Path:** {targetWorkflowPath}
-
-**Edits Applied:**
-{Summarize from edit plan}
-
-**Files Modified:**
-{List files changed}
-
-**Compliance Status:**
-{Any compliance issues found and fixed}
-
----
-
-**What would you like to do next?**
-
-**[V]alidate** - Run comprehensive validation to verify all changes
-**[M]ore edits** - Make additional changes
-**[C]omplete** - Finish editing (without validation)
-**[R]eview changes** - See detailed change log"
-
-### 3. Menu Handling Logic
-
-- **IF V:** Load, read entirely, then execute {validationWorkflow}. After validation completes, return to this step.
-- **IF M:** Route to step-e-02-discover-edits.md for more changes
-- **IF C:** Load, read entirely, then execute {completeStep}
-- **IF R:** Present detailed edit log from editPlan, then redisplay this menu
-- **IF Any other:** help user respond, then redisplay menu
-
-### 4. Update Edit Plan (If Completing Without Validation)
-
-**IF user selects [C] Complete:**
-
-Update editPlan frontmatter:
-```yaml
-completionDate: '{current-date}'
-validationAfterEdit: skipped
-completionStatus: complete_without_validation
-```
-
-Document in editPlan:
-```markdown
-## Completion
-
-**Completed:** {current-date}
-**Validation:** Skipped per user request
-**Recommendation:** Run validation before using workflow in production
-```
-
-### 5. Handle Validation Return
-
-**IF validation was run and completed:**
-
-Load and review validation report. Present findings:
-
-"**Validation Complete:**
-
-**Overall Status:** {status}
-**New Issues:** {count}
-**Remaining Issues:** {count}
-
-**Would you like to:**
-
-1. **[F]ix new issues** - Return to fix-validation step
-2. **[M]ore edits** - Make additional changes
-3. **[C]omplete** - Finish with current validation status"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF F: Route to step-e-03-fix-validation.md
-- IF M: Route to step-e-02-discover-edits.md
-- IF C: Load, read entirely, then execute {completeStep}
-- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-This is a routing step. Route user to appropriate next step based on their choice. Always offer validation before completing.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Edit summary presented clearly
-- All options explained
-- User routed to appropriate next step
-- Validation offered before completion
-- Edit plan updated if completing
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not offering validation
-- Routing to wrong step
-- Not updating edit plan when completing
-
-**Master Rule:** Always offer validation after edits. Route correctly based on user choice.