@delorenj/pjangler 1.2.25 → 1.2.33

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-c/step-01-discovery.md

@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-01-discovery'
-description: 'Discover and understand the user workflow idea through collaborative conversation'
-
-nextStepFile: './step-02-classification.md'
-workflowExamples: '../data/workflow-examples.md'
-workflowPlanFile: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/workflows/{new_workflow_name}/workflow-plan-{new_workflow_name}.md'
----
-
-# Step 1: Discovery
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To understand the user's workflow idea through open-ended conversation, showing them what's possible, and discovering their vision before making any structural decisions.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a workflow architect and systems designer
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring workflow design expertise, user brings their vision
-- ✅ Together we will discover what they need
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on understanding their idea
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to ask for name, module, or technical decisions in this step
-- 💬 Ask 1-2 questions at a time, think about their response before probing deeper
-- 🚪 DON'T rush to classification - understand first
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load examples FIRST to show what's possible
-- 💬 Start with open-ended "Tell me about your idea..."
-- 📖 Update frontmatter stepsCompleted when complete
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until we understand their vision
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Variables from workflow.md are available in memory
-- This is pure discovery - no decisions yet
-- Don't ask technical questions yet
-- Focus on the problem space and user's vision
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 1. Load Context FIRST
-
-Load `{workflowExamples}` BEFORE talking to the user.
-
-**Note:** You already understand workflow architecture from having read workflow.md to get here. The step-file architecture you just experienced (micro-file design, JIT loading, sequential enforcement, state tracking) is exactly what we'll be helping users create.
-
-**From workflowExamples**, you now know 10 diverse workflow examples across domains:
-- Health & Fitness (Meal Plan)
-- Finance (Tax Organizer)
-- Legal/HR (Termination Checklist)
-- Entertainment (RPG Campaign)
-- Education (Syllabus Creator)
-- Business (SOP Writer)
-- Creative (Novel Outliner)
-- Events (Wedding Itinerary)
-- Personal Development (Life Review)
-- Home Improvement (Renovation Planner)
-
-This context helps you understand whatever the user describes and guide them effectively.
-
-### 2. Open-Ended Invitation
-
-Start with:
-
-"**Welcome! I'm here to help you create a workflow.**
-
-Let me start by sharing what's possible: Workflows can help with everything from meal planning to tax preparation, from creative writing to project management. They're structured processes that guide you (or others) through a task step-by-step.
-
-**Tell me about your idea** - what problem are you trying to solve? What's the vision?"
-
-### 3. Listen and Probe
-
-As they describe their idea:
-
-**DO:**
-- Listen carefully
-- Ask 1-2 follow-up questions at a time
-- Think about their response before asking more
-- Probe for: Who is this for? What's the outcome? What's the challenge they're facing?
-- Use "Think about their response before..." pattern
-
-**DON'T:**
-- Ask about module, name, or technical details
-- Rapid-fire questions
-- Jump to solutions
-- Rush this step
-
-### 4. Deepen Understanding
-
-Once you have the basic idea, probe deeper:
-
-"That's really interesting. Let me understand better:
-
-- Walk me through a scenario where someone would use this workflow
-- What does success look like at the end?
-- Who would be running this workflow - you, your team, customers?
-- Is this something you'd do once, or repeat over time?
-
-**Think about their response before continuing...**"
-
-### 5. Check Understanding
-
-Before moving on, confirm you understand:
-
-"Let me make sure I've got this right:
-
-[Summarize your understanding in 2-3 sentences]
-
-Did I capture that correctly? What should I adjust?"
-
-### 6. Create Initial Plan Document
-
-Create `{workflowPlanFile}` with initial discovery notes:
-
-```markdown
----
-stepsCompleted: ['step-01-discovery']
-created: [current date]
-status: DISCOVERY
----
-
-# Workflow Creation Plan
-
-## Discovery Notes
-
-**User's Vision:**
-[Summarize the problem they're solving and their vision]
-
-**Who It's For:**
-[Users/audience]
-
-**What It Produces:**
-[The outcome/deliverable]
-
-**Key Insights:**
-[Any important context gathered]
-```
-
-### 7. Transition to Classification
-
-"Great! I understand what you're trying to build. Now let's figure out the technical details - what type of workflow this is, how it should be structured, and where it will live."
-
-### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: **Proceeding to workflow classification...**
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- This is a discovery step with no user choices at the end
-- Proceed directly to next step after discovery is complete
-- Always halt if user wants to continue discussing their idea
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- After discovery complete and plan document created, immediately load and execute `{nextStepFile}` to begin classification
-- IF user wants to keep discussing their idea: continue conversation, then repeat menu check
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- User's vision clearly understood
-- Discovery notes captured in plan document
-- User feels heard and understood
-- Ready to proceed to classification
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Rushing to technical decisions before understanding
-- Asking for name/module in this step
-- Not loading examples first
-- Rapid-fire questions without thinking about responses
-
-**Master Rule:** Understand first, classify second. Discovery comes before structure.

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-c/step-01b-continuation.md

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-# TODO - THIS IS A PLACE HOLDER NOT IMPLEMENTED YET IN THIS FLOW
-
-<attention-llm>YOU CAN CALL OUT AS A WARNING IN ANY VALIDATION CHECKS of this specific workflow - but this is a known pending todo to implement.</attention-llm>

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-c/step-02-classification.md

@@ -1,269 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-classification'
-description: 'Classify the workflow by answering the 4 key structural decisions'
-
-nextStepFile: './step-03-requirements.md'
-workflowTypeCriteria: '../data/workflow-type-criteria.md'
-workflowPlanFile: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/workflows/{new_workflow_name}/workflow-plan-{new_workflow_name}.md'
-bmbCreationsOutputFolder: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}'
-customWorkflowLocation: '{custom_workflow_location}'
----
-
-# Step 2: Workflow Classification
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To determine the 4 key structural decisions that define how the workflow will be built: module affiliation, continuable vs single-session, tri-modal vs create-only, and document output.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a workflow architect helping classify their workflow
-- ✅ Explain the trade-offs of each decision clearly
-- ✅ Help them make informed choices
-- ✅ These 4 decisions affect the entire workflow structure
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on the 4 key structural decisions
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip any of the 4 decisions
-- 💬 Explain each decision in plain language before asking
-- 🚪 These decisions determine file structure, naming, and location
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load workflowTypeCriteria for the decision framework
-- 💾 Document each decision in the plan
-- 📖 Update frontmatter stepsCompleted when complete
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until all 4 decisions are made
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Discovery from Step 1 informs these decisions
-- These are STRUCTURAL decisions that affect everything else
-- Once made, changing them is difficult
-- Take time to explain trade-offs
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 0. Load Decision Framework
-
-Load `{workflowTypeCriteria}` to understand the 4 key decisions and their implications.
-
-### 1. Decision 1: Document Output (FIRST - It's Fundamental)
-
-"**Let's classify your workflow. I'll walk you through 4 key decisions that determine how it's built.**
-
-**Decision 1: What does your workflow produce?**
-
-Based on your idea from discovery, let me clarify:"
-
-- [If unclear from discovery] "Does this workflow produce a document or file at the end? A report, a plan, a story, a checklist?"
-
-Present the two options:
-
-**A. Document-Producing**
-- Creates a persistent output file
-- Examples: reports, plans, stories, checklists, forms
-- Uses templates for structure
-
-**B. Non-Document**
-- Performs actions without creating a document
-- Examples: refactoring code, running tests, orchestrating tools
-- May produce temporary files but no persistent output
-
-"Which describes your workflow?"
-
-**Think about their response before continuing...**
-
-Once decided:
-- Document: `workflowProducesDocuments: true`
-- Non-document: `workflowProducesDocuments: false`
-
-### 2. Decision 2: Module Affiliation
-
-"**Decision 2: Where will this workflow live?**
-
-Workflows can be standalone or part of a module:"
-
-**Standalone:**
-- NOT part of any module
-- Stored in your custom location
-- Only standard variables available
-
-**Module-Based (BMB, BMM, CIS, BMGD, etc.):**
-- Part of a specific module
-- Has access to module-specific variables
-- Stored in that module's workflows directory
-
-"Is this workflow:
-- **A)** Standalone - just for you/custom use
-- **B)** Part of a module - which one?"
-
-**If they don't know modules:**
-"Modules are specialized areas:
-- **BMB** - Module building workflows
-- **BMM** - Software development workflows (PRDs, architecture, etc.)
-- **CIS** - Innovation and creative workflows
-- **BMGD** - Game development workflows
-- **Custom** - Your own workflows
-
-Does your workflow fit into one of these areas, or is it standalone?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 3. Decision 3: Continuable or Single-Session
-
-"**Decision 3: Could this workflow take multiple sessions to complete?**
-
-Think about: Will this workflow consume many tokens or take a long time? Might users need to pause and come back later?"
-
-**Single-Session:**
-- Quick, focused workflows (15-30 minutes)
-- Simpler structure
-- No continuation logic needed
-
-**Continuable:**
-- Can span multiple sessions
-- Complex, many steps
-- Saves progress, can resume later
-- Needs `step-01b-continue.md`
-
-"Is your workflow:
-- **A)** Single-session - quick and focused
-- **B)** Continuable - could take multiple sessions"
-
-**Help them think:**
-- "Walk me through how long you think this would take..."
-- "What happens if someone gets halfway through and has to stop?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 4. Decision 4: Create-Only or Tri-Modal
-
-"**Decision 4: Will this workflow need Edit and Validate capabilities?**
-
-Some workflows are simple - you create them once and use them. Others need full lifecycle support:**
-
-**Create-Only:**
-- Just `steps-c/` (create steps)
-- Simpler, faster to build
-- Good for: experimental workflows, one-off use, simple tools
-
-**Tri-Modal (Create + Edit + Validate):**
-- Has `steps-c/`, `steps-e/` (edit), and `steps-v/` (validate)
-- Full lifecycle support
-- Can be modified and validated after creation
-- Good for: complex workflows, maintained workflows, team use
-
-"Do you envision:
-- **A)** Create-only - build it and use it
-- **B)** Tri-modal - create, edit, AND validate capabilities"
-
-**If they're unsure:**
-"Think: Will you or others want to modify this workflow later? Does it need quality checking/validation?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 5. Name the Workflow
-
-"Now that we understand what this workflow IS, let's name it properly.
-
-Based on everything we've discovered, what would you call this?
-
-Some guidance:
-- Use kebab-case: `my-workflow-name`
-- Be descriptive but concise
-- Think: What would someone search for to find this?
-
-[Offer suggestions based on their vision]"
-
-**Check for uniqueness:**
-- Look for folder at `{bmb_creationsOutputFolder}/workflows/{proposed-name}/`
-- If exists: "That name is taken. Want to try a variant like...?"
-- Loop until unique name confirmed
-
-Document the final name.
-
-### 6. Confirm Target Location
-
-Based on module decision, confirm and document the target path:
-
-**For standalone/custom:**
-- Target: `{customWorkflowLocation}/{workflow-name}/`
-- Typically: `_bmad/custom/src/workflows/{workflow-name}/`
-
-**For modules:**
-- Check module's workflow location from module.yaml
-- Confirm path with user
-
-Document: `targetWorkflowPath: [confirmed path]`
-
-### 7. Update Plan with Classification
-
-Update `{workflowPlanFile}`:
-
-```markdown
-## Classification Decisions
-
-**Workflow Name:** {name}
-**Target Path:** {targetWorkflowPath}
-
-**4 Key Decisions:**
-1. **Document Output:** {true/false}
-2. **Module Affiliation:** {standalone/module-name}
-3. **Session Type:** {single-session/continuable}
-4. **Lifecycle Support:** {create-only/tri-modal}
-
-**Structure Implications:**
-- [Document what this means: e.g., "Needs steps-c/, steps-e/, steps-v/", "Needs step-01b-continue.md", etc.]
-```
-
-### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and redisplay menu
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml
-- IF P: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md
-- IF C: Update plan frontmatter with stepsCompleted and classification, then load `{nextStepFile}`
-- IF Any other: Help user, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All 4 key decisions made and documented
-- Workflow named appropriately
-- Target location confirmed
-- Structural implications understood
-- Plan updated with classification
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Skipping any of the 4 key decisions
-- Naming before understanding (old pattern)
-- Not explaining trade-offs
-- Not checking for name conflicts
-
-**Master Rule:** The 4 key decisions determine everything else. Get them right before proceeding.