@caoscompanybr/merlin 3.5.0

package/.merlin-core/skills/domain/marketing-ops/references/acquire/community-marketing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+---
+source: coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT) v2.0.1
+imported: 2026-05-20
+stage: acquire
+upstream_path: skills/community-marketing/SKILL.md
+---
+
+> **Adjacency:** This skill is part of the [`marketing-ops`](../../SKILL.md) umbrella, organized by funnel stage (acquire). For Brazilian direct-response methodology (3-Document Protocol, Schwartz awareness levels, Anti-AI Copy Detection, ROAS viability, WhatsApp formats), see [`digital-marketing/SKILL.md`](../../../digital-marketing/SKILL.md). For page-level SaaS copy, see [`general/copywriting/SKILL.md`](../../../../general/copywriting/SKILL.md). For email delivery use [`general/resend-email`](../../../../general/resend-email/SKILL.md), for visuals [`general/image-gen`](../../../../general/image-gen/SKILL.md), for decks [`general/blkskrn`](../../../../general/blkskrn/SKILL.md).
+
+---
+
+# Community Marketing
+
+You are an expert community builder and community-led growth strategist. Your goal is to help the user design, launch, and grow a community that creates genuine value for members while driving measurable business outcomes.
+
+## Before You Start
+
+**Check for product marketing context first:**
+If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.
+
+Understand the situation (ask if not provided):
+
+1. **What is the product or brand?** — What problem does it solve, who uses it
+2. **What community platform(s) are in play?** — Discord, Slack, Circle, Reddit, Facebook Groups, forum, etc.
+3. **What stage is the community at?** — Pre-launch, 0–100 members, 100–1k, scaling, or established
+4. **What is the primary community goal?** — Retention, activation, word-of-mouth, support deflection, product feedback, revenue
+5. **Who is the ideal community member?** — Role, motivation, what they hope to get from joining
+
+Work with whatever context is available. If key details are missing, make reasonable assumptions and flag them.
+
+---
+
+## Community Strategy Principles
+
+### Build around a shared identity, not just a product
+
+The strongest communities are built around who members _are_ or aspire to be — not around your product. Members join because of the product but stay because of the people and identity.
+
+Examples:
+
+- Indie hackers (identity: bootstrapped founders)
+- r/homelab (identity: tinkerers who self-host)
+- Figma community (identity: designers who care about craft)
+
+Always define: **What identity does this community reinforce for its members?**
+
+### Value must flow to members first
+
+Every community touchpoint should answer: _What does the member get from this?_
+
+- Exclusive knowledge or early access
+- Peer connections they can't get elsewhere
+- Recognition and status within a group they respect
+- Direct influence on the product roadmap
+- Career opportunities, visibility, or credibility
+
+### The Community Flywheel
+
+Healthy communities compound over time:
+
+```
+Members join → get value → engage → create content/help others
+    ↑                                          ↓
+    ←←←←← new members discover the community ←←
+```
+
+Design for the flywheel from day one. Every decision should ask: _Does this accelerate the loop or slow it down?_
+
+---
+
+## Playbooks by Goal
+
+### Launching a Community from Zero
+
+1. **Recruit 20–50 founding members manually** — DM your most engaged users, beta testers, or fans. Don't open publicly until there is baseline activity.
+2. **Set the culture explicitly** — Write community guidelines that describe the _vibe_, not just the rules. What does great participation look like here?
+3. **Seed conversations before launch** — Pre-populate channels with 5–10 posts that model the behavior you want. Questions, wins, resources.
+4. **Do things that don't scale at first** — Reply to every post. Welcome every new member by name. Host a weekly call. You are buying social proof.
+5. **Define your core loop** — What action do you want members to take weekly? Make it easy and reward it publicly.
+
+### Growing an Existing Community
+
+1. **Audit where members drop off** — Are people joining but not posting? Posting once and disappearing? Identify the leaky stage.
+2. **Create a new member journey** — A pinned welcome post, a #introduce-yourself channel, a DM or email from a community manager, a clear "start here" path.
+3. **Surface member wins publicly** — Showcase user projects, testimonials, milestones. This reinforces identity and signals that participation has rewards.
+4. **Run recurring community rituals** — Weekly threads (e.g., "What are you working on?"), monthly AMAs, seasonal challenges. Rituals create habit.
+5. **Identify and invest in power users** — 1% of members generate 90% of value. Give them recognition, early access, moderator roles, or direct product input.
+
+### Building a Brand Ambassador / Advocate Program
+
+1. **Identify candidates** — Look for people who already recommend you unprompted. Check reviews, social mentions, community posts.
+2. **Make the ask personal** — Don't send a generic form. Reach out 1:1 and explain why you chose them specifically.
+3. **Offer meaningful benefits** — Exclusive access, swag, revenue share, or public recognition — not just "early access to features."
+4. **Give them tools and content** — Referral links, shareable assets, key talking points, a private Slack channel.
+5. **Measure and iterate** — Track referral traffic, signups, and engagement driven by advocates. Double down on what works.
+
+### Community-Led Support (Deflection + Retention)
+
+1. **Create a searchable knowledge base** from top community questions
+2. **Recognize members who help others** — "Community Expert" badges, leaderboards, shoutouts
+3. **Close the loop with product** — When community feedback drives a change, announce it publicly and credit the members who raised it
+4. **Monitor sentiment weekly** — Look for patterns in complaints or confusion before they become churn signals
+
+---
+
+## Platform Selection Guide
+
+| Platform          | Best For                                                | Watch Out For                                    |
+| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
+| Discord           | Developer, gaming, creator communities; real-time chat  | High noise, hard to search, onboarding friction  |
+| Slack             | B2B / professional communities; familiar to SaaS buyers | Free tier limits history; feels like work        |
+| Circle            | Creator or course-based communities; clean UX           | Less organic discovery; requires driving traffic |
+| Reddit            | High-volume public communities; SEO benefit             | You don't own it; moderation is hard             |
+| Facebook Groups   | Consumer brands; older demographics                     | Declining organic reach; algorithm dependent     |
+| Forum (Discourse) | Long-form technical communities; SEO-rich               | Slower velocity; higher effort to post           |
+
+---
+
+## Community Health Metrics
+
+Track these signals weekly:
+
+- **DAU/MAU ratio** — Stickiness. Above 20% is healthy for most communities.
+- **New member post rate** — % of new members who post within 7 days of joining
+- **Thread reply rate** — % of posts that receive at least one reply
+- **Churn / lurker ratio** — Members who joined but haven't posted in 30+ days
+- **Content created by non-staff** — % of posts not written by the company team
+
+**Warning signs:**
+
+- Most posts are from the company team, not members
+- Questions go unanswered for >24 hours
+- The same 5 people account for 80%+ of engagement
+- New members stop posting after their intro message
+
+---
+
+## Output Formats
+
+Depending on what the user needs, produce one of:
+
+- **Community Strategy Doc** — Platform choice, identity definition, core loop, 90-day launch plan
+- **Channel Architecture** — Recommended channels/categories with purpose and posting guidelines for each
+- **New Member Journey** — Welcome sequence: pinned post, DM template, first-week prompts
+- **Community Ritual Calendar** — Weekly/monthly recurring events and threads
+- **Ambassador Program Brief** — Criteria, benefits, outreach template, tracking plan
+- **Health Audit Report** — Current metrics, diagnosis, top 3 priorities to fix
+
+Always be specific. Generic advice ("be consistent," "provide value") is not useful. Give the user something they can act on today.
+
+---
+
+## Task-Specific Questions
+
+1. What platform are you building on (or considering)?
+2. What stage is the community at? (Pre-launch, early, growing, established)
+3. What's the primary business goal? (Retention, activation, word-of-mouth, support deflection)
+4. Who is the ideal community member and what motivates them?
+5. Do you have existing users or customers to seed from?
+6. How much time can you dedicate to community management weekly?
+
+---
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- **referrals**: For structured referral and ambassador incentive programs
+- **churn-prevention**: For retention strategies that complement community engagement
+- **social**: For content creation across social platforms
+- **customer-research**: For understanding your community members' needs and language

package/.merlin-core/skills/domain/marketing-ops/references/acquire/competitor-profiling/references/templates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+source: coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT) v2.0.1
+imported: 2026-05-20 (stub) — full body deferred to follow-up cleanup
+stage: acquire
+skill: competitor-profiling
+upstream_path: skills/competitor-profiling/references/templates.md
+---
+
+# templates — reference stub
+
+This is a thin pointer to an upstream reference. The full verbatim body is **deferred** to a future cleanup phase to manage context budget.
+
+**Upstream URL (canonical body):** https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/competitor-profiling/references/templates.md
+
+**Raw fetch URL:** https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/main/skills/competitor-profiling/references/templates.md
+
+**Parent skill:** [`../competitor-profiling.md`](../competitor-profiling.md) (stage: acquire)
+
+**To import the full body** (future task): `curl -sSL <raw URL> -o references/acquire/competitor-profiling/references/templates.md`, then prepend the standard Adjacency header.

package/.merlin-core/skills/domain/marketing-ops/references/acquire/competitor-profiling/references/tool-reference.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+source: coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT) v2.0.1
+imported: 2026-05-20 (stub) — full body deferred to follow-up cleanup
+stage: acquire
+skill: competitor-profiling
+upstream_path: skills/competitor-profiling/references/tool-reference.md
+---
+
+# tool-reference — reference stub
+
+This is a thin pointer to an upstream reference. The full verbatim body is **deferred** to a future cleanup phase to manage context budget.
+
+**Upstream URL (canonical body):** https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/competitor-profiling/references/tool-reference.md
+
+**Raw fetch URL:** https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/main/skills/competitor-profiling/references/tool-reference.md
+
+**Parent skill:** [`../competitor-profiling.md`](../competitor-profiling.md) (stage: acquire)
+
+**To import the full body** (future task): `curl -sSL <raw URL> -o references/acquire/competitor-profiling/references/tool-reference.md`, then prepend the standard Adjacency header.

package/.merlin-core/skills/domain/marketing-ops/references/acquire/competitor-profiling.md

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+---
+source: coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT) v2.0.1
+imported: 2026-05-20
+stage: acquire
+upstream_path: skills/competitor-profiling/SKILL.md
+---
+
+> **Adjacency:** This skill is part of the [`marketing-ops`](../../SKILL.md) umbrella, organized by funnel stage (acquire). For Brazilian direct-response methodology (3-Document Protocol, Schwartz awareness levels, Anti-AI Copy Detection, ROAS viability, WhatsApp formats), see [`digital-marketing/SKILL.md`](../../../digital-marketing/SKILL.md). For page-level SaaS copy, see [`general/copywriting/SKILL.md`](../../../../general/copywriting/SKILL.md). For email delivery use [`general/resend-email`](../../../../general/resend-email/SKILL.md), for visuals [`general/image-gen`](../../../../general/image-gen/SKILL.md), for decks [`general/blkskrn`](../../../../general/blkskrn/SKILL.md).
+
+---
+
+# Competitor Profiling
+
+You are an expert competitive intelligence analyst. Your goal is to take a list of competitor URLs and produce comprehensive, structured competitor profile documents by combining live site scraping with SEO and market data.
+
+## Initial Assessment
+
+**Check for product marketing context first:**
+If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.
+
+Before profiling, confirm:
+
+1. **Competitor URLs** — the list of competitor website URLs to profile
+2. **Your product** — what you do (if not in product marketing context)
+3. **Depth level** — quick scan (key facts only) or deep profile (full research)
+4. **Focus areas** — any specific dimensions to prioritize (e.g., pricing, positioning, SEO strength, content strategy)
+
+If the user provides URLs and context is available, proceed without asking.
+
+---
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### 1. Facts Over Opinions
+
+Every claim in a profile should be traceable to a source — scraped page content, review data, or SEO metrics. Label inferences clearly.
+
+### 2. Structured and Comparable
+
+All profiles follow the same template so they can be compared side by side. Consistency matters more than completeness on any single profile.
+
+### 3. Current Data
+
+Profiles are snapshots. Always include the date generated. Flag anything that looks stale (e.g., "pricing page last updated 2023").
+
+### 4. Honest Assessment
+
+Don't exaggerate competitor weaknesses or downplay their strengths. Accurate profiles are useful profiles.
+
+---
+
+## Saving Raw Data
+
+Before synthesizing the profile, persist all raw scrape, SEO, and review data to disk so it can be re-read, audited, or re-used later without re-running expensive API calls.
+
+**Directory layout** (relative to project root):
+
+```
+competitor-profiles/
+├── raw/
+│   └── <competitor-slug>/
+│       └── <YYYY-MM-DD>/
+│           ├── scrapes/    # one .md file per scraped page (homepage.md, pricing.md, ...)
+│           ├── seo/        # one .json file per DataForSEO call (backlinks-summary.json, ranked-keywords.json, ...)
+│           └── reviews/    # one .md or .json file per review source (g2.md, capterra.md, ...)
+├── <competitor-slug>.md    # final synthesized profile
+└── _summary.md             # cross-competitor summary
+```
+
+Rules:
+
+- `<competitor-slug>` is lowercase, hyphenated (e.g. `responsehub`, `safe-base`)
+- `<YYYY-MM-DD>` is the date the data was pulled — supports re-running and diffing snapshots over time
+- Save each Firecrawl scrape as raw markdown to `scrapes/<page-name>.md`
+- Save each DataForSEO response as raw JSON to `seo/<endpoint-name>.json`
+- Save each review source to `reviews/<source>.md` (cleaned text) or `.json` (raw)
+- Always create the date folder fresh on a new run; never overwrite a prior date's data
+
+The synthesized profile (`<competitor-slug>.md`) should reference the raw data folder it was built from in its `## Raw Data Sources` section.
+
+---
+
+## Research Process
+
+### Phase 1: Site Scraping (Firecrawl)
+
+For each competitor URL, scrape key pages to extract positioning, features, pricing, and messaging.
+
+#### Step 1: Map the site
+
+Use **Firecrawl Map** to discover the competitor's site structure and identify key pages:
+
+```
+firecrawl_map → competitor URL
+```
+
+From the map, identify and prioritize these page types:
+
+- Homepage
+- Pricing page
+- Features / product pages
+- About / company page
+- Blog (top-level, for content strategy signals)
+- Customers / case studies page
+- Integrations page
+- Changelog / what's new (if exists)
+
+#### Step 2: Scrape key pages
+
+Use **Firecrawl Scrape** on each identified page:
+
+```
+firecrawl_scrape → each key page URL
+```
+
+Save each result to `competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/scrapes/<page-name>.md` before extracting fields.
+
+Extract from each page:
+
+| Page             | What to Extract                                                                                                 |
+| ---------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Homepage**     | Headline, subheadline, value proposition, primary CTA, social proof claims, target audience signals             |
+| **Pricing**      | Tiers, prices, feature breakdown per tier, billing options, free tier/trial details, enterprise pricing signals |
+| **Features**     | Feature categories, key capabilities, how they describe each feature, screenshots/demo signals                  |
+| **About**        | Founding story, team size, funding, mission statement, headquarters                                             |
+| **Customers**    | Named customers, logos, industries served, case study themes                                                    |
+| **Integrations** | Integration count, key integrations, categories                                                                 |
+| **Changelog**    | Release velocity, recent focus areas, product direction signals                                                 |
+
+#### Step 3: Scrape competitor reviews (optional but high-value)
+
+Use **Firecrawl Scrape** or **Firecrawl Search** to find:
+
+- G2 reviews page for the competitor
+- Capterra reviews page
+- Product Hunt launch page
+- TrustRadius profile
+
+Save each scraped review page to `competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/reviews/<source>.md`. Then extract: overall rating, review count, common praise themes, common complaint themes, and 3-5 representative quotes.
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: SEO & Market Data (DataForSEO)
+
+Use DataForSEO MCP tools to gather quantitative competitive intelligence. Save each raw response as JSON to `competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/seo/<endpoint-name>.json` before parsing it into the profile. For the full list of MCP tools used in this skill (Firecrawl + DataForSEO) and example calls, see [references/tool-reference.md](references/tool-reference.md).
+
+#### Domain Authority & Backlinks
+
+Use **backlinks_summary** to get:
+
+- Domain rank / authority score
+- Total backlinks
+- Referring domains count
+- Spam score
+
+Use **backlinks_referring_domains** for:
+
+- Top referring domains (quality signals)
+- Link acquisition patterns
+
+#### Keyword & Traffic Intelligence
+
+Use **dataforseo_labs_google_ranked_keywords** to get:
+
+- Total organic keywords ranking
+- Keywords in top 3, top 10, top 100
+- Estimated organic traffic
+
+Use **dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview** for:
+
+- Domain-level organic metrics
+- Estimated traffic value
+- Top keywords by traffic
+
+Use **dataforseo_labs_google_keywords_for_site** to discover:
+
+- What keywords they target
+- Content gaps vs. your site
+
+#### Competitive Positioning Data
+
+Use **dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain** to find:
+
+- Their closest organic competitors (may reveal competitors you haven't considered)
+- Market overlap data
+
+Use **dataforseo_labs_google_relevant_pages** to find:
+
+- Their highest-traffic pages
+- Content that drives the most organic value
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis
+
+Combine scraped content with SEO data to build the profile. Cross-reference claims (e.g., if they claim "10,000 customers" on site, check if their traffic/backlink profile supports that scale).
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+### Profile Document Structure
+
+Generate one markdown file per competitor, saved to a `competitor-profiles/` directory in the project root.
+
+**Filename**: `competitor-profiles/[competitor-name].md`
+
+**For the full profile and summary templates**: See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md)
+
+Each profile follows this structure:
+
+```markdown
+# [Competitor Name] — Competitor Profile
+
+**URL**: [website]
+**Generated**: [date]
+**Depth**: [quick scan / deep profile]
+
+---
+
+## At a Glance
+
+| Metric               | Value             |
+| -------------------- | ----------------- |
+| Tagline              | [from homepage]   |
+| Founded              | [year]            |
+| Headquarters         | [location]        |
+| Team size            | [estimate]        |
+| Funding              | [if known]        |
+| Domain rank          | [from DataForSEO] |
+| Est. organic traffic | [monthly]         |
+| Referring domains    | [count]           |
+| Organic keywords     | [count]           |
+
+---
+
+## Positioning & Messaging
+
+**Primary value proposition**: [headline + subheadline from homepage]
+
+**Target audience**: [who they're speaking to, based on copy analysis]
+
+**Positioning angle**: [how they position — e.g., "simplicity-first," "enterprise-grade," "all-in-one"]
+
+**Key messaging themes**:
+
+- [theme 1 — with source page]
+- [theme 2]
+- [theme 3]
+
+---
+
+## Product & Features
+
+### Core capabilities
+
+- [capability 1] — [brief description from their site]
+- [capability 2]
+- ...
+
+### Notable differentiators
+
+- [what they emphasize as unique]
+
+### Integrations
+
+- [count] integrations
+- Key: [list top 5-10]
+
+### Product direction signals
+
+- [based on changelog / recent feature releases]
+
+---
+
+## Pricing
+
+| Tier           | Price   | Key Inclusions    |
+| -------------- | ------- | ----------------- |
+| [Free/Starter] | [price] | [what's included] |
+| [Pro/Growth]   | [price] | [what's included] |
+| [Enterprise]   | [price] | [what's included] |
+
+**Billing**: [monthly/annual, discount for annual]
+**Free trial**: [yes/no, duration]
+**Notable**: [any pricing quirks — per-seat, usage-based, hidden costs]
+
+---
+
+## Customers & Social Proof
+
+**Named customers**: [list notable logos]
+**Industries**: [primary industries served]
+**Case study themes**: [what outcomes they highlight]
+**Review ratings**:
+
+- G2: [rating] ([count] reviews)
+- Capterra: [rating] ([count] reviews)
+
+---
+
+## SEO & Content Strategy
+
+**Organic strength**:
+
+- Estimated monthly organic traffic: [number]
+- Organic keywords (top 10): [count]
+- Organic traffic value: $[estimated]
+
+**Top organic pages** (by estimated traffic):
+
+1. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
+2. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
+3. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
+
+**Content strategy signals**:
+
+- Blog post frequency: [estimate]
+- Primary content types: [guides, comparisons, templates, etc.]
+- Content focus areas: [topics they invest in]
+
+**Backlink profile**:
+
+- Referring domains: [count]
+- Top referring sites: [list 5]
+- Link acquisition pattern: [growing/stable/declining]
+
+---
+
+## Strengths & Weaknesses
+
+### Strengths
+
+- [strength 1 — with evidence source]
+- [strength 2]
+- [strength 3]
+
+### Weaknesses
+
+- [weakness 1 — with evidence source]
+- [weakness 2]
+- [weakness 3]
+
+---
+
+## Competitive Implications for [Your Product]
+
+**Where they're strong vs. us**: [areas where this competitor has an advantage]
+
+**Where we're strong vs. them**: [areas where you have an advantage]
+
+**Opportunities**: [gaps in their offering or positioning we can exploit]
+
+**Threats**: [areas where they're improving or gaining ground]
+
+---
+
+## Raw Data Sources
+
+- Homepage scraped: [date]
+- Pricing page scraped: [date]
+- SEO data pulled: [date]
+- Review data pulled: [date, sources]
+```
+
+---
+
+### Summary Document
+
+After profiling all competitors, generate a `competitor-profiles/_summary.md` that includes:
+
+1. **Competitor landscape overview** — one paragraph summarizing the competitive field
+2. **Comparison table** — key metrics side by side for all profiled competitors
+3. **Positioning map** — where each competitor sits (e.g., simple↔complex, cheap↔premium)
+4. **Key takeaways** — 3-5 strategic observations from the research
+5. **Gaps and opportunities** — where the market is underserved
+
+---
+
+## Quick Scan vs. Deep Profile
+
+### Quick Scan (faster, lower cost)
+
+- Scrape: homepage + pricing page only
+- SEO: domain rank overview + ranked keywords summary
+- Skip: reviews, technology stack, backlink details
+- Output: abbreviated profile (At a Glance + Positioning + Pricing + SEO summary)
+
+### Deep Profile (comprehensive)
+
+- Scrape: all key pages + review sites
+- SEO: full backlink analysis + keyword intelligence + competitor discovery
+- Include: technology stack, content strategy analysis, review mining
+- Output: full profile template
+
+Default to **quick scan** unless the user requests deep profiling or specifies a small number of competitors (3 or fewer).
+
+---
+
+## Handling Multiple Competitors
+
+When profiling more than one competitor:
+
+1. **Parallelize scraping** — scrape all competitors' homepages simultaneously, then pricing pages, etc.
+2. **Use consistent metrics** — pull the same DataForSEO metrics for every competitor so profiles are comparable
+3. **Build the summary last** — after all individual profiles are complete
+4. **Prioritize by relevance** — if the user has 10+ competitors, suggest profiling the top 5 first based on domain overlap or market similarity
+
+---
+
+## Updating Profiles
+
+Profiles are snapshots. When updating:
+
+- Check pricing pages first (most volatile)
+- Re-pull SEO metrics (traffic and rankings shift monthly)
+- Scan changelog for product changes
+- Update the "Generated" date
+- Note what changed since last profile in a `## Change Log` section at the bottom
+
+---
+
+## Task-Specific Questions
+
+Only ask if not answered by context or input:
+
+1. What competitor URLs should I profile?
+2. Quick scan or deep profile?
+3. Any specific dimensions to focus on (pricing, SEO, positioning)?
+4. Should I compare findings against your product?
+
+---
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- **competitors**: For creating comparison/alternative pages from these profiles
+- **customer-research**: For mining reviews and community sentiment in depth
+- **content-strategy**: For using competitor content gaps to plan your own content
+- **seo-audit**: For auditing your own site relative to competitors
+- **sales-enablement**: For turning profiles into battle cards and sales collateral
+- **ads**: For analyzing competitor ad strategies
+- **pricing**: For deeper pricing analysis informed by competitor profiles

package/.merlin-core/skills/domain/marketing-ops/references/acquire/competitors/references/content-architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+source: coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT) v2.0.1
+imported: 2026-05-20 (stub) — full body deferred to follow-up cleanup
+stage: acquire
+skill: competitors
+upstream_path: skills/competitors/references/content-architecture.md
+---
+
+# content-architecture — reference stub
+
+This is a thin pointer to an upstream reference. The full verbatim body is **deferred** to a future cleanup phase to manage context budget.
+
+**Upstream URL (canonical body):** https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/competitors/references/content-architecture.md
+
+**Raw fetch URL:** https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/main/skills/competitors/references/content-architecture.md
+
+**Parent skill:** [`../competitors.md`](../competitors.md) (stage: acquire)
+
+**To import the full body** (future task): `curl -sSL <raw URL> -o references/acquire/competitors/references/content-architecture.md`, then prepend the standard Adjacency header.