advent_of_ruby 0.3.1 → 0.3.2

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/03.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eazkl9g/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eazkl9g
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -48,14 +48,14 @@
     This one kicked my ass. I barked up the wrong tree for a long time, took me over an hour to debug everything.
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb2rsqp/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb2rsqp
     :body: |-
       Rances can actually be made inclusive simply by adding `...` instead of `..` as the range operator.
 
       Great solution!
     :replies: []
   - :author: daybreaker
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0b4bm/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0b4bm
     :body: |-
       Went in sort of the same route for Part 1, using .times instead of .each
 
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: moomaka
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0dv9v/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0dv9v
   :body: |-
     # Ruby
 
@@ -109,11 +109,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: ZoDalek
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb11gyo/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb11gyo
     :body: Shame the struct definition is a little verbose because man the solution itself is so beautifully compact!
     :replies:
     - :author: moomaka
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb141fd/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb141fd
       :body: |-
         The Struct was just for readability, but you can code golf it down a bit and still keep it fairly easy to read:
 
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
         ```
       :replies: []
 - :author: rock_neurotiko
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eazomdx/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eazomdx
   :body: |-
     Day 3 in Ruby:
 
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: CommanderViral
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0a1zv/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0a1zv
   :body: |-
     Crystal (both parts 1 and 2 computed together)
 
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
     And what's fun is it's valid Ruby with a line added and 3 lines changed.
   :replies: []
 - :author: jschulenklopper
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0s050/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0s050
   :body: |-
     Ruby... but in a single pass over the claims. (I see a lot of double passes; one processing all the claims for marking the fabric, one processing all the claims again or the fabric to look for single-marked spots.)
 
@@ -268,11 +268,11 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: omegaxLoL
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0txje/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb0txje
   :body: "[My solution in Ruby](https://github.com/aosousa/AdventOfCode2018/blob/master/day3.rb). Using Advent of Code to learn Ruby this year so any tips are welcome!"
   :replies: []
 - :author: vanderzee94
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb1q783/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eb1q783
   :body: |-
     Ruby Solution for both parts
 
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: 121lazz
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eccbxf3/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2lesz/2018_day_3_solutions/eccbxf3
   :body: |-
     Later than late to the party, but a party 'twas.
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/04.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb2drs1/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb2drs1
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: oezi13
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb3exp2/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb3exp2
     :body: |-
       Yeah for Ruby!
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb1xcir/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb1xcir
   :body: |-
     Yeah!!! I have no idea what I'm doing anymore!!! Ruby
 
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
     Edit: Changed the layout of the code so you can run it without any hassle and it will just work. If you're reading this, bless you
   :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb21dgj/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb21dgj
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -211,14 +211,14 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: charismotron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb1ym65/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb1ym65
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
     [https://github.com/chrismo/adventofcode2018/blob/master/day4/script.rb](https://github.com/chrismo/adventofcode2018/blob/master/day4/script.rb)
   :replies: []
 - :author: morfi717
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb2c2f5/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a2xef8/2018_day_4_solutions/eb2c2f5
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/05.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4digq/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4digq
   :body: |-
     Ruby, reporting in.
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
     Edit: Yeah okay, after reading others' solutions, I get it, a less wasteful way to do it would be to add letters left-to-right and therefore I know I only need to delete from the right end of the string. Let this be a lesson on there being a huge difference between what I write if I want to go as fast as possible versus what I might write if I actually have time to think about it.
   :replies:
   - :author: Karl_Marxxx
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb576m4/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb576m4
     :body: |-
       As someone learning ruby for the first time, this is an excellent code snippet to study. Mind if I ask a few questions?
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
       Sorry for the noob q's but this language is fascinating.
     :replies:
     - :author: p_tseng
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5mrpo/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5mrpo
       :body: |-
         Hey there, don't hesitate to ask any more question if you have any!
 
@@ -80,11 +80,11 @@
         That would be because of the `if` afterward. You may see this used in some pieces of code like `raise SomeError if something`. It would be "unfortunate" if that raised an error every time. Thus, it doesn't happen unless the condition is true. For more information you could read about "modifier if"
       :replies: []
   - :author: _liquidlemon
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5t4em/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5t4em
     :body: I'm also solving in Ruby and I have to say that I absolutely love your solutions. They're all really smart and checking out your solution is as interesting as solving it on my own, because every day you seem to include something that I didn't even know existed in the language (like taking array slices with `[x, y]`, symbol arrays in the form of `%i()`, the safe navigation operator that you had in your refined solution for today, `Hash#to_proc`, being able to group statements in parentheses to use the modifier syntax). I really appreciate that you're publishing all your solutions so that others can learn from them. Even if I end up refactoring my solutions so that they end up looking a little bit too much like yours ;)
     :replies:
     - :author: p_tseng
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb6c82q/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb6c82q
       :body: |-
         Thanks for writing in. Indeed one of my hopes is that I can show some interesting things that can be done in the language.
 
@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@
         Just some interesting thoughts when I consider how others might make use of my code.
       :replies:
       - :author: _liquidlemon
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb6e4d6/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb6e4d6
         :body: |-
           They did stand out to me as well but I think in this kind of scenario where concise code is valued they are perfectly fine. Especially the second one I've used before and not felt too bad about it. Being able to save a value while using it at the same time can be really useful at times. Heck, even Python introduced a way to do that recently (although it didn't happen without controversy).
 
           I look forward to seeing your future solutions (and hope I can still understand them :P). Good luck with staying on top of the leaderboard!
         :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4fpde/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4fpde
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: jazzido
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4ec3w/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4ec3w
   :body: |-
     Part 1, in Ruby:
 
@@ -168,15 +168,15 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4g72j/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4g72j
     :body: Ooh clever use of character codes!
     :replies: []
   - :author: reacher
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4i3ms/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4i3ms
     :body: This is a nice solution, but it breaks when the first 2 characters have matching polarity. adding "and !stack.empty?" to that first condition fixes it
     :replies: []
 - :author: charismotron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4j96r/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4j96r
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Schaulustiger
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5t6ic/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb5t6ic
   :body: |-
     **Ruby from the command line**
 
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: morfi717
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb60kp7/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb60kp7
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: juzmark
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/ec71qi0/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/ec71qi0
   :body: |-
     Ruby - Looking for feedback. Thank you!
 
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
     ​
   :replies: []
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4d97q/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3912m/2018_day_5_solutions/eb4d97q
   :body: |-
     Had two bugs... Fixed one, couldn't find the other one fast enough :p Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/06.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: daybreaker
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb74i3j/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb74i3j
   :body: |-
     While we wait for the bug fix, here's my theoretically working part 1 and 2 in completely non-optimized horrible ruby
 
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb765k8/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb765k8
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: charismotron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb74hkg/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb74hkg
   :body: |-
     _Ruby_
 
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb9fmta/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3kr4r/2018_day_6_solutions/eb9fmta
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/07.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/eb9xtuf/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/eb9xtuf
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: aoc_throwaway
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebbg934/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebbg934
     :body: |-
       check out my part 1 ruby solution:
 
@@ -123,19 +123,19 @@
       --kss
     :replies: []
   - :author: Larkenx
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebc0qie/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebc0qie
     :body: here’s my part 1 ruby solution as well, after learning ruby for a couple hours https://github.com/Larkenx/AdventOfCode2018/blob/master/7/parta.rb
     :replies:
     - :author: craigontour
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebkkqqn/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebkkqqn
       :body: Which site did you use to learn Ruby so fast?
       :replies:
       - :author: Larkenx
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebl4ws1/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebl4ws1
         :body: Pretty much the Ruby docs exclusively. I had just learned Perl 6 and Lua, which are quite similar in ways
         :replies: []
 - :author: Dee_Jiensai
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/eba5rfj/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/eba5rfj
   :body: |-
     ruby 2.5.1
 
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: aoc_throwaway
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebbhb9y/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebbhb9y
     :body: |-
       check out my part 1 ruby solution:
 
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: aoc_throwaway
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebazkui/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebazkui
   :body: |-
     Short Ruby solution for part 1, takes \<1ms to run (usually around 0.3ms):
 
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
     -kss
   :replies:
   - :author: wzkx
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebchy1a/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebchy1a
     :body: |-
       Very good solution! I translated it into Python to see if it looks the same there.
 
@@ -321,11 +321,11 @@
       ```
     :replies:
     - :author: aoc_throwaway
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebfgin4/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebfgin4
       :body: Nice! Probably faster in python too. Ruby is slow.
       :replies: []
 - :author: morfi717
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebcrskf/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a3wmnl/2018_day_7_solutions/ebcrskf
   :body: |-
     Ruby (0.08s)
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/08.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc8pi3/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc8pi3
   :body: |-
     Ruby... and factoring out as much of the common code between parts 1 and 2 as is possible
 
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: BluFoot
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc9drb/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc9drb
     :body: A work of art.
     :replies: []
 - :author: justjarvo
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcsq2r/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcsq2r
   :body: |-
     Part 1 Ruby golf:
 
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Sharparam
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcytm4/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcytm4
   :body: |-
     **Ruby** (2.5.3p105)
 
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
     But did [an OO approach](https://github.com/Sharparam/advent-of-code/blob/master/2018/day8/part2.rb) for part 2 as it felt more natural to me.
   :replies: []
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc97go/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebc97go
   :body: |-
     I'm getting old... and slow :D Ruby
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcbdl3/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcbdl3
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Sharparam
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcxwe0/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcxwe0
     :body: |-
       For your shifting, you could save a bit of space by doing
 
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: ShorrockIn
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcsa65/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebcsa65
   :body: |-
     **Ruby** : The OO approach worked out pretty well with this one.
 
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: morfi717
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebenbhc/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a47ubw/2018_day_8_solutions/ebenbhc
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/09.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebepxns/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebepxns
   :body: |-
     RUBY
 
@@ -41,29 +41,29 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: GeneralYouri
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/eberm2j/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/eberm2j
     :body: |-
       I don't know Ruby at all, but I had the exact same bug, which caused one of the provided test cases to fail. The reason was stupid simple: my iteration used `<` instead of `<=`, making it skip the last marble.
 
       **Edit:** `b.times` seems to be your 'loop', right? Could you do something like `(b + 1).times` to solve the bug?
     :replies:
     - :author: Unihedron
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebes9zz/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebes9zz
       :body: |-
         Absolutely! I was planning to fix this alongside the edit where I put in my rewritten solution that is quick for part 2, but you beat me to it :) My input was lucky and was not divisible by 23.
 
         x.times is an iterator that does something x times but calls the loop with the intervals 0-indexed, so another fix could be just `(1..b).each` which would remove the `next if _==0` skip case in the loop. (In general it's a good idea not to use `.times` with the parameter since it's, as demonstrated, not exactly intuitive. Looping through numbers is generally done with ranges and not `.times`.)
       :replies: []
   - :author: Aquamoogle
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebessxz/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebessxz
     :body: A quick Google (I don't know Ruby, but didn't believe that ruby didn't support linked lists.) Turns out much like other languages these days objects are passed as pointers which allows LINKED LISTS. One sample walk through I found here. http://www.jessespevack.com/blog/2018/2/2/lets-make-a-linked-list-in-ruby
     :replies:
     - :author: Unihedron
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebesyzq/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebesyzq
       :body: Ruby does a good job keeping the abstraction of objects away from actually complicating space, so it will recognize and respect what you're trying to do with a Node class and actually play well with your linked list. However of course you actually have to write it (there's no standard library module with it, you can't just load something like `require 'matrix'`). And I'm writing one just so I can also use it in case it shows up in the future.
       :replies: []
   - :author: tomthecool
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebhhk72/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebhhk72
     :body: |-
       You're right... But it's quite easy to create a basic implementation via a custom class:
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: dtinth
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebeqjn6/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebeqjn6
   :body: |-
     ## Ruby (#122, #18)
 
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: hluk
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebex92k/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebex92k
   :body: |-
     Ruby. Took me a while to realize that `Array#insert` is no go because it's very slow.
 
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: justinhj
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebgwbnq/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebgwbnq
     :body: |-
       I am amazed how slow my solution was on part 2 using a simple array approach with insert. It took over 2 hours.
 
@@ -215,11 +215,11 @@
       [https://github.com/justinhj/adventofcode2018/blob/master/day9ruby/day9part2.rb](https://github.com/justinhj/adventofcode2018/blob/master/day9ruby/day9part2.rb)
     :replies: []
   - :author: WalrusTusks_are_funk
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebwbd5o/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebwbd5o
     :body: 'This is a pretty nice, simple implementation of a double-linked list. Worked great for me. I found a c++ deque implementation here for Ruby, but it didn''t work properly for me: [https://github.com/wyhaines/deque](https://github.com/wyhaines/deque)'
     :replies: []
 - :author: ChronJob
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebexx35/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebexx35
   :body: |-
     Ruby. Wrote my own doubly linked list which was many orders of magnitude faster than my original Array based approach.
 
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: nuvan
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebeqqlu/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebeqqlu
   :body: |-
     **Ruby** , 67/242.
 
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebf3a63/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4i97s/2018_day_9_solutions/ebf3a63
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2018/10.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhaqcb/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhaqcb
   :body: |-
     Ruby. Top 100 in both parts, yay!
 
@@ -29,22 +29,22 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: teddim
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhf89i/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhf89i
     :body: Congrats!!
     :replies: []
   - :author: HeyItsBATMANagain
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhjjnm/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhjjnm
     :body: |-
       > if j['###### ###### #### ##### #### #### #### ###']
 
       Not a ruby dude, but doesn't this only work if you already know that this string will be part of the answer?
     :replies:
     - :author: Unihedron
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhjtgv/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhjtgv
       :body: Yes. I copied it from the end of part 1 since I haven't closed my terminal window yet. Calling `[other_string]` on a string will perform a match - if it exists, it allows you to write to it (e.g. `'abc'['b']='d'`) but in this case it just returns a non-nil value. I don't know how to generalize this in a fast enough way that can be done in speedcoding.
       :replies: []
 - :author: ChronJob
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhayvp/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhayvp
   :body: |-
     Ruby 196/194! It was fun to watch the animation on my terminal.
 
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhc17x/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhc17x
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: jtgorn
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhk89a/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhk89a
   :body: |-
     I kind of like this Ruby code
 
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
     My heuristic was quite simple - wait until height of the cluster gets small enough and than present iterations to user and let him decide which one gives readable text.
   :replies: []
 - :author: dtinth
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhawi5/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhawi5
   :body: |-
     ## Ruby (#13,#16)
 
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: HeyItsBATMANagain
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhr634/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebhr634
   :body: |-
     # Crystal
 
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebj2o9o/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/a4skra/2018_day_10_solutions/ebj2o9o
   :body: |-
     Ruby