advent_of_ruby 0.3.1 → 0.3.2

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/10.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: ericdykstra
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsxjs/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsxjs
   :body: |-
     Ruby solution using the new (as of 2.2.0) slice\_when enum method.
 
@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: tomb0y
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxttgxo/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxttgxo
     :body: love the slice\_when! you could also use chars instead of split("") :)
     :replies: []
 - :author: tomb0y
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsvjq/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsvjq
   :body: |-
     Being on the leaderboard feels awesome :)
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: reacher
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsc40/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsc40
   :body: |-
     My Ruby solution. I finally made the leaderboard!
 
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Axsuul
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsvn9/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtsvn9
   :body: |-
     Recursive Ruby solution
 
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Axsuul
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtt00p/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtt00p
     :body: |-
       I also like to write specs
 
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: gnuconsulting
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtthdu/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtthdu
   :body: |-
     My initial (braindead) copy finished the first part in a few seconds. The second run is still going, 15 minutes in. In fact, it took long enough for me to remember something vague about there being a difference in speed between various methods of string concatenation in ruby, look it up, copy my program, change two instances of += to \<\<, run the modified script, get the right answer, and finish the challenge.
 
@@ -169,19 +169,19 @@
     I'll reply to this with the total time the first copy takes (if it ever finishes).
   :replies:
   - :author: gnuconsulting
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuvnr/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuvnr
     :body: Almost exactly an hour! Vs. 5 seconds using \<\<
     :replies: []
   - :author: dalfgan
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuxzx/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuxzx
     :body: 'ahah I did the same thing (but I used "#{x}#{y}"). After 2 or 3 min, I was like something is not correct. What about doing this in your code: final \<\< count.to\_s \<\< current'
     :replies:
     - :author: gnuconsulting
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtv7xw/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtv7xw
       :body: No noticeable change. Still takes about 5.5 seconds for 50 iterations. I believe it's because it does the right-hand concat first (between `count.to_s` and `current`) which are both tiny strings, before appending the result onto `final` (the death-blow if you use `+=`).
       :replies: []
 - :author: segfaultvicta
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuu0n/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtuu0n
   :body: |-
     Golang - there's probably a slightly cleaner way to do this.
 
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: metamatic
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwhtoh/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwhtoh
     :body: |-
       > Ruby or Perl would have made the solution obvious and a nice clean one-liner, I think, but honestly one of the reasons I'm doing these in golang is deliberately to run into these sort of issues
 
@@ -228,14 +228,14 @@
       Anyhow, I guessed that speed was going to be an issue, so I checked and read that [byte buffers are the way to do character appends in Go](http://golang-examples.tumblr.com/post/86169510884/fastest-string-contatenation). I went that route and the code finishes in half a second. You might want to compare your code's speed with a byte buffer version?
     :replies:
     - :author: segfaultvicta
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwymqg/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwymqg
       :body: |-
         Huh, neat, thanks for the link! I think I will try that sometime and speed-compare just for funsies.
 
         Writing to a byte buffer is definitely a lot cleaner-looking, to me, too, so.
       :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtw6vi/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxtw6vi
   :body: |-
     **Ruby solution**
 
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: tremendo
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxu2gu7/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxu2gu7
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: vanderzee94
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxub4t6/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxub4t6
   :body: |-
     My solution in ruby
 
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: zacwaz
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxuxeku/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxuxeku
   :body: |-
     Simple, functional **Ruby** solution:
 
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: talkb1nary
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwr955/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3w6h3m/day_10_solutions/cxwr955
   :body: |-
     Late to party, but i liked my result in Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/11.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: '0x0dea'
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv1vx5/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv1vx5
   :body: |-
     I finally "won" one! Thanks, Ruby.
 
@@ -12,27 +12,27 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv2ayw/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv2ayw
     :body: "[deleted]"
     :replies:
     - :author: _jonah
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv38y5/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv38y5
       :body: "`s.succ!` is doing more magic than the regexps."
       :replies:
       - :author: KrzaQ2
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv7ln7/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv7ln7
         :body: Not that much, I used `(n.to_i(36)+1).to_s(36).gsub('0', 'a')` to get the next string.
         :replies: []
       - :author: gfixler
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv44uz/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv44uz
         :body: What's scary is knowing that these things are probably in car braking systems and pacemakers.
         :replies: []
   - :author: _jonah
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv2ror/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv2ror
     :body: This is beautiful. And TIL succ could be applied to str, and `!~` exists. And as long as we're golfing, you can shave off a bit by replacing your scan with `s =~ /(.)\1.*(.)\2/`
     :replies: []
   - :author: gareve
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv7uat/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv7uat
     :body: |-
       Nice, I've discovered Regexp.union :) Without that I was trying with:
 
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
   - :author: takeitonben
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvp7z6/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvp7z6
     :body: code like this is almost like magic to me.
     :replies: []
   - :author: crossbrowser
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvb4s5/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvb4s5
     :body: |-
       Doesn't this fail rule #3?
 
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
       Or is `"aabaa"` valid?
     :replies:
     - :author: jmorais
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxveg1y/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxveg1y
       :body: |-
         None of my inputs had this problem. To solve just put a uniq.
 
@@ -69,11 +69,11 @@
         ```
       :replies:
       - :author: crossbrowser
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvetmy/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvetmy
         :body: Nice, I was trying to do something similar but didn't know about scan. Useful.
         :replies: []
   - :author: segfaultvicta
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvcfqo/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvcfqo
     :body: |-
       > r = Regexp.union [\*?a..?z].each\_cons(3).map(&:join)
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
       How long does this take to run, out of curiosity?
     :replies: []
 - :author: tremendo
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv34sv/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv34sv
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -113,15 +113,15 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv79ev/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv79ev
     :body: "[deleted]"
     :replies:
     - :author: tremendo
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvajgu/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvajgu
       :body: Indeed! thanks for that.
       :replies: []
 - :author: gnuconsulting
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv3oyr/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv3oyr
   :body: |-
     Ruby's .next operator for strings made this really easy. As per usual, I know my regex is bad and should feel bad, but I don't care. Also, I gotta stop with the social life - second night in a row that it cost me a spot on the board.
 
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: topaz2078
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv5hua/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv5hua
     :body: |-
       DISREGARD SOCIALIZING
 
       ACQUIRE STARS
     :replies: []
 - :author: amnn9
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv77ns/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxv77ns
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
     My Haskell side yearned for an _iterate_ function, so that's what drove this implementation.
   :replies: []
 - :author: beefamaka
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvqlz7/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wbzyv/day_11_solutions/cxvqlz7
   :body: |-
     here's my solution in F#. Feeling jealous of the Ruby 'succ' function so I tried to create my own.
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/12.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: gareve
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw7q3o/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw7q3o
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
     For part 1 I just did the regex /(-)\*\d+/ on my editor and copied the values on a spreadsheet xD. The funny part is that this regex it fails with strings like "asd123def"
   :replies: []
 - :author: Axsuul
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw7uw8/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw7uw8
   :body: |-
     Ruby recursive solution
 
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: tremendo
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw8sxq/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxw8sxq
   :body: |-
     Here's mine. Another **Ruby** one:
 
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: tremendo
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwj2t0/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwj2t0
     :body: |-
       Looking at it a few hours later, bored, felt the need to compact it a little bit:
 
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
 - :author: gnuconsulting
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxway30/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxway30
   :body: |-
     Day 3 of not being home at 9. It's starting to kill me a little (on the inside). But that's ok, a bug in my part 2 logic would have easily cost me a place on the leaderboard anyway. I did the 'smart' thing and parsed the JSON for part 1 so the bones were all there for part 2. And like most people, this just cried out for recursion.
 
@@ -200,11 +200,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: topaz2078
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwcgcz/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwcgcz
     :body: You could have put the `"red"` check at the top of traverseHash instead of before calling traverseHash everywhere.
     :replies: []
 - :author: phpaoc
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwcgn1/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwcgn1
   :body: |-
     Part1, Ruby, golfed:
 
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
     _You will not encounter any strings containing numbers._ clearly was an invitation for not actually parsing JSON.
   :replies: []
 - :author: rkachowski
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwpauu/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwpauu
   :body: |-
     ruby, not too happy with it..
 
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
     but i eventually discovered that when using more than one block param in the call to `Array#each` results in pattern matching kicking in and you lose elements that don't have an appropriate variable to map to... yuk
   :replies: []
 - :author: aprosepro
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwpi3y/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwpi3y
   :body: |-
     part 2 in ruby, i enjoyed this one. of course, like others said... i saw part 1 and thought the entire challenge would be a cakewalk. total re-write from my single line regex for part 1.
 
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: jchook
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwqecp/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wh73d/day_12_solutions/cxwqecp
   :body: |-
     Ruby, golfed slightly
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/13.yml

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 ---
 - :author: SomebodyTookMyHandle
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxx8buz/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxx8buz
   :body: 'Brute forced it in Ruby, very similar to how I solved #9 (construct graph, find permutations with built-in method, profit). Basically the only difference is that this graph is directed whereas day #9 was undirected. Missed the leaderboard by a minute due to a variety of comedic errors and misreading the submission instructions for Part Two.'
   :replies:
   - :author: ThereOnceWasAMan
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxyqpfn/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxyqpfn
     :body: 'This is undirected too, since relationships are always reciprocal. Just save "A''s change sitting next to B + B''s change sitting next to A", and consider that "distance from A to B". Then it''s equivalent to #9 -- the only difference is that it''s a true TSP, since you end up back where you started, whereas #9 you never complete the last leg of the TSP.'
     :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxbvmo/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxbvmo
   :body: |-
     Brute force Ruby solution:
 
@@ -71,15 +71,15 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Herathe
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxdt68/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxdt68
     :body: 'Hey just a quick pointer: You can use the constant -Float::INFINITY instead of -9999999. That way any value is guaranteed to be larger than maximum'
     :replies:
     - :author: "[deleted]"
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxlwks/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxlwks
       :body: Thanks for the tip!!! :) I've just started with Ruby and was doing this quick and dirty, and didn't take the time to find out what the Math.MAX\_INT equivalent was....
       :replies: []
     - :author: SomebodyTookMyHandle
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxyejbd/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxyejbd
       :body: |-
         By the way, there's a quick and dirty way to write this:
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
         Sacrifices a bit of clarity though.
       :replies: []
 - :author: phpaoc
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxd775/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxd775
   :body: |-
     Ruby:
 
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: rkachowski
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxe2wk/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxe2wk
   :body: |-
     ruby, again v similar to #9
 
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
     whenever i come here i always feel like everyone else has already managed to solve this both faster, and with only 0.2 lines of code
   :replies: []
 - :author: JurgenKesker
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxgndr/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wm0oy/day_13_solutions/cxxgndr
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/14.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: SomebodyTookMyHandle
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxydtvs/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxydtvs
   :body: |-
     I also tackled it in Ruby using a class-based approach. A bit sloppy, but, hey, it's not only the reindeer who are racing!
 
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: JurgenKesker
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxytybj/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxytybj
     :body: |-
       Nice, I have almost the same approach. Only I see you use .max\_by. I will look that one up, didn't know that one.
 
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@
       -- I had a look at max\_by, but it seems to return only 1 leader. What if there are multiple leaders? Your code doesn't seem to handle that.
     :replies:
     - :author: SomebodyTookMyHandle
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cy0flil/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cy0flil
       :body: That's a very good point. I guess I lucked out in that the leader was the first position in the array so that that reindeer received all the ties.
       :replies: []
 - :author: Axsuul
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxye2lc/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxye2lc
   :body: |-
     Ruby (State machine)
 
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: jchook
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyeaqr/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyeaqr
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: gnuconsulting
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyef06/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyef06
   :body: |-
     Well out of the leaderboard today - part 2 kicked my butt. I feel like I can - more and more - see the seams between my ever-so-slightly-more-than-shell-scripts and "real" programs.
 
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: rkachowski
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyiyjk/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyiyjk
   :body: |-
     ruby
 
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@
     i screwed myself by forgetting that **each** winning reindeer gets a point
   :replies: []
 - :author: JurgenKesker
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxytkcc/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxytkcc
   :body: |-
     Ruby part 1 & 2
 
@@ -412,11 +412,11 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: HorizonShadow
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyxwec/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxyxwec
   :body: Ruby - https://github.com/HorizonShadow/Advent-of-Code/tree/master/day14
   :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxz2qac/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cxz2qac
   :body: |-
     Ruby solution:
 
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: zacwaz
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cy1snmd/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wqtx2/day_14_solutions/cy1snmd
   :body: |-
     Ruby:
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/15.yml

@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
 ---
 - :author: lannonbr
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzhu3m/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzhu3m
   :body: 'It seems that everyone was going brute force for this problem. I would be interested to see one that wasn''t. Anyway here''s my solution in Ruby: [day15.rb](https://github.com/lannonbr/AdventOfCode/blob/master/day15/day15.rb)'
   :replies:
   - :author: r_sreeram
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzl0u2/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzl0u2
     :body: |-
       > everyone was going brute force for this problem. I would be interested to see one that wasn't.
 
       https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzkxzn
     :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzit7z/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzit7z
   :body: |-
     Finally made the leaderboard!!!! :)
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: ericdykstra
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzkgnc/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzkgnc
   :body: |-
     Non-brute-forced solution to the first half in Ruby. Since I figured a greedy algorithm would work right out the gate, I decided to write that instead of brute-force. It's not pretty, and I had to switch to a brute-force method to get #90 on the leaderboard for part 2, but here it is.
 
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: JurgenKesker
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzrq92/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzrq92
   :body: |-
     Ruby, part 2. Couldn't find a way to dynamically generate the combinations, so went for a hardcoded nested for loop.
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Phakx
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzszqn/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzszqn
   :body: |-
     Solution in **Ruby** after some iterations...
 
@@ -349,11 +349,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: JurgenKesker
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzyqtc/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxzyqtc
     :body: Nice use of `repeated_combination`. Didn't know that one.
     :replies: []
 - :author: razr_69
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxztug8/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cxztug8
   :body: |-
     My solution in Ruby.
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
     Appreciate your feedback on the solution :)
   :replies: []
 - :author: Herathe
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cy26spt/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3wwj84/day_15_solutions/cy26spt
   :body: |-
     Ruby part 1 using repeated\_combination
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2015/16.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: gareve
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0xp4y/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0xp4y
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: jchook
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy1l6if/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy1l6if
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: SnacksOnAPlane
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0pkb5/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0pkb5
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**
 
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: _jonah
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0qr2l/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0qr2l
   :body: |-
     ruby:
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Phakx
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0w2ui/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy0w2ui
   :body: |-
     pretty expressive solution in **Ruby** :
 
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: rkachowski
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy1cjw7/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy1cjw7
   :body: |-
     ruby! i could probably have cut this down if i wasn't so goddamn determined to copy paste
 
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: Herathe
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy28o92/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3x1i26/day_16_solutions/cy28o92
   :body: |-
     **Ruby part 1** https://github.com/herathe/advent-of-code/blob/master/16-1.rb