advent_of_ruby 0.3.1 → 0.3.2

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/12.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: yjerem
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db36vjr/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db36vjr
   :body: |-
     This was really fun! Here's a compiler in Ruby that outputs C.
 
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: willkill07
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db36zjn/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db36zjn
     :body: heh, I [did mine in awk](https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db36od6/). Almost identical
     :replies: []
 - :author: brantyr
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db37axs/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5hus40/2016_day_12_solutions/db37axs
   :body: |-
     Ruby assembunny parser. Scraped into the top 100, but have done some heavy refactoring since that
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/14.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: yjerem
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6bfrw/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6bfrw
   :body: |-
     Ruby, took 90 seconds to run for part II:
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: 3urny
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6p8s0/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6p8s0
     :body: |-
       I did a Ruby solution too. It took about 80s just like yours. One thing that makes the ruby code fast is only checking for hashes with 5 repeated characters at first, and then going back when one is found.
 
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@
       And since I had the forking anyways, I used that too and got it to run in 5s with both C extension and forking.
     :replies: []
   - :author: jtbandes
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6cm0z/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db6cm0z
     :body: "Very neat. TIL that `String#[]` can accept a substring to search for.\n\nI got #3 for part 1 with a much less clean Ruby solution, but it was too slow for part 2...then I made the fatal choice of deciding to rewrite it in C... \U0001F635 let's just say you won't find me on the part 2 leaderboard."
     :replies: []
 - :author: el_daniero
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db758en/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5i8pzz/2016_day_14_solutions/db758en
   :body: |-
     Ruby.
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/15.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: jtbandes
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7uj0t/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7uj0t
   :body: |-
     Today's a great day for [another](https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/3xjpp2/day_20_solutions/cy59qye/) [Mathematica one-liner](http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/ChineseRemainder.html):
 
@@ -35,25 +35,25 @@
     - off-by-one errors :(
   :replies:
   - :author: Wee2mo
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7vciq/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7vciq
     :body: I had a hunch Mathematica would have an abrupt solution if you happened to know about it.
     :replies: []
   - :author: nononopotato
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/dbalad9/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/dbalad9
     :body: |-
       I tried this with my input: ChineseRemainder[{10, 15, 17, 1, 0, 1}-Range[6], {13, 17, 19, 7, 5, 3}]
 
       And it gave me 388735, which wasn't the correct answer..? Anything I did wrong?
     :replies:
     - :author: jtbandes
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/dbatom5/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/dbatom5
       :body: |-
         You missed a `-`; it should be `ChineseRemainder[-{10, 15, 17, 1, 0, 1}-Range[6], {13, 17, 19, 7, 5, 3}]`.
 
         That's because, for instance, for your first disc we want `10+t+1 = 0 (mod 13)`, or `t = -10-1 (mod 13)`.
       :replies: []
 - :author: andars_
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7u0fg/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7u0fg
   :body: |-
     Ruby!
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: jtbandes
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7uy6u/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7uy6u
     :body: |-
       Quick tip that I've been using for some of these: you can use the `DATA`/` __END__ ` feature to cram everything in one file:
 
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@
       ```
     :replies:
     - :author: andars_
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7v4ik/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7v4ik
       :body: That's neat, I haven't seen that before. I'll give it a try.
       :replies: []
   - :author: mperham
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7vnz8/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db7vnz8
     :body: |-
       I created the input manually rather than regexp'ing it. Enumerable#all? came in super-handy:
 
@@ -127,18 +127,18 @@
       ```
     :replies:
     - :author: "[deleted]"
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db805j4/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db805j4
       :body: "[deleted]"
       :replies:
       - :author: mperham
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db8c8jb/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db8c8jb
         :body: |-
           Whoa, that first line is amazing. Kudos.
 
           Side note, I always use #detect because #find clashes with ActiveRecord::Base#find.
         :replies: []
       - :author: eregontp
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db8qn8e/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ifn4v/2016_day_15_solutions/db8qn8e
         :body: |-
           Mine is p (0..Float::INFINITY).find { |t| disks.all? { |dt, n, pos| (t + pos + dt) % n == 0 } }
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/16.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5imh3d/2016_day_16_solutions/db9m64a/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5imh3d/2016_day_16_solutions/db9m64a
   :body: |-
     This is one lucky program that runs both in Ruby and Crystal :-)
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/17.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: el_daniero
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbb5xbi/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbb5xbi
   :body: |-
     Ruby. I made the search into a generator which yields all the paths in the order they are found. Then I could call `first` and `max` on the same object to get the answers for part 1 and 2 respectively.
 
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: yjerem
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbarvjw/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbarvjw
   :body: |-
     Ruby, 13/11!
 
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: mperham
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbbbt1b/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5isvxv/2016_day_17_solutions/dbbbt1b
     :body: |-
       Recursion will clean up your code alot.
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/18.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbc4udx/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbc4udx
   :body: |-
     My first naive solution takes about 17 seconds to finish part 2. Once again, this is unacceptably slow.
 
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
     About half a second. Not as good as the compiled C code, which takes about 7 milliseconds, but it'll do.
   :replies: []
 - :author: eregontp
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbcb1ln/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbcb1ln
   :body: |-
     Ruby one-liner. I find it rather readable for a golfed solution.
 
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: johneffort
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbcpya7/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5iyp50/2016_day_18_solutions/dbcpya7
   :body: |-
     Ruby, quite readable, not very fast, but doable. 30s for part 2
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/20.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: el_daniero
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jbeqo/2016_day_20_solutions/dbfo4nb/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jbeqo/2016_day_20_solutions/dbfo4nb
   :body: |-
     **Ruby**. Clean as I could and covering any corner cases.
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: anonymous_4_custody
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jbeqo/2016_day_20_solutions/dbjdm3n/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jbeqo/2016_day_20_solutions/dbjdm3n
     :body: |-
       > Ruby
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/21.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbge41p/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbge41p
   :body: |-
     Full disclosure: Of course for the leaderboard placement I will brute force the password by trying every permutation of abcdefgh. It makes sense to do that because we have the forward process programmed and "do not have time" to make the reverse process. At least, it would probably take more time to make the reverse process than to just brute force.
 
@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@
     As far as I can tell, there is only one unique solution for any given input (please correct if I am wrong).
   :replies:
   - :author: topaz2078
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbge6w8/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbge6w8
     :body: |-
       > As far as I can tell, there is only one unique solution for any given input
 
       All of the functions _should_ be perfectly reversible. I tried to be quite careful about that.
     :replies:
     - :author: daniel-sd
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbges98/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbges98
       :body: |-
         For size 8 this is true. But for the sample size (5), rotate around letter is not always reversible.
 
@@ -104,18 +104,18 @@
         Unfortunately practicing with the sample input was quite confusing for this one.
       :replies:
       - :author: BumpitySnook
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgf1py/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgf1py
         :body: Your puzzle input wasn't abcde, though. Topaz controls the inputs and the scrambling recipe.
         :replies: []
       - :author: topaz2078
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgfoqx/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgfoqx
         :body: For the second part, you can use the example generator you wrote in part 1. Furthermore, your input is the process, not the string - the string you're working on is the same for everyone.
         :replies: []
       - :author: bildzeitung
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgexsx/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbgexsx
         :body: That's the gotcha -- size 8 is key to making that rule work. Eric's mapping function is unique over that string length.
         :replies: []
       - :author: eregontp
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbhak5z/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5ji29h/2016_day_21_solutions/dbhak5z
         :body: 'And indeed, for the example output (decab), there are two valid inputs: abcde and deabc.'
         :replies: []

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2016/22.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: p_tseng
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhw73s/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhw73s
   :body: |-
     Those compatible pairs that we were asked to print out in part 1? [You know something funny about them?](#s "They all involve the empty disk!!!"). So this game devolves into "how can we move the data with only one disk empty at a time?", sort of like those [sliding tile puzzles](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_puzzle).
 
@@ -111,25 +111,25 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: topaz2078
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwjaw/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwjaw
     :body: |-
       > They all involve the empty disk.
 
       Could it be a clue?!
     :replies: []
   - :author: pedrosorio
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwe0d/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwe0d
     :body: |-
       > Those compatible pairs that we were asked to print out in part 1? They all involve the empty disk.
 
       That's it, from now on in advent of code, if asked about number of things X, I am always going to print the list of things X :P
     :replies:
     - :author: topaz2078
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhx3so/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhx3so
       :body: That is a _really_ good strategy. Many of the puzzles' part 1 is just a stepping stone to make sure you're on-track for part 2.
       :replies: []
   - :author: BumpitySnook
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwvxz/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhwvxz
     :body: |-
       Your solution arrives at 225 steps for my input, as does /u/drysle 's. My solution and hand solution get 224. The website says neither is correct. /u/topaz2078 , help? Input is here: http://dpaste.com/0JHB11A
 
@@ -169,22 +169,22 @@
       ```
     :replies:
     - :author: topaz2078
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhx0cw/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhx0cw
       :body: For part two, I get 225, and that's also what the site is expecting.
       :replies:
       - :author: BumpitySnook
-        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhxarn/
+        :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhxarn
         :body: I swear I entered 225 into the site and got 'Wrong'. Doh. Must have typoed it.
         :replies:
         - :author: "[deleted]"
-          :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbiew3r/
+          :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbiew3r
           :body: Did you get the right answer? I counted yours and got 232. Is it right?
           :replies:
           - :author: BumpitySnook
-            :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbif5yn/
+            :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbif5yn
             :body: As topaz says, 225 is correct.
             :replies: []
   - :author: Quick_Question404
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhww4u/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/5jor9q/2016_day_22_solutions/dbhww4u
     :body: I immediately thought of the sliding tile puzzle when seeing this problem, but couldn't think of any way to programatically solve it.
     :replies: []

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2017/01.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: eregontp
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlqjqh/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlqjqh
   :body: |-
     2 lines of Ruby:
 
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
     Just change the argument to rotate to 1 for part 1.
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqltuo8/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqltuo8
     :body: "[deleted]"
     :replies: []
 - :author: jschulenklopper
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlq7z2/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlq7z2
   :body: |-
     Short solution in Ruby, combining both parts:
 
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: jschulenklopper
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlws4o/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlws4o
     :body: |-
       Even more Ruby-esque:
 
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@
       This removes the elements not meeting the condition from the array, and then totals the remaining digits.
     :replies: []
   - :author: Grimnur87
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlu3s6/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlu3s6
     :body: Good to know. Same approach here, at least the crux lines. I did use an `each_cons(2)` in the first part. This is neater.
     :replies: []
 - :author: disclosure5
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlik5e/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlik5e
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: egze
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlw51d/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7gsrc2/2017_day_1_solutions/dqlw51d
   :body: |-
     My ruby attempt
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2017/02.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnakx9/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnakx9
   :body: |-
     Rank #7 for Part 1 ^^ just slightly over 1 minute with Ruby! Didn't make it on leaderboards with part 2 due to a stupid bug that took **18!!!** minutes to debug :(
 
@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Grimnur87
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnl07h/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnl07h
     :body: I also used sort! and reverse to optimise the search.
     :replies:
     - :author: Unihedron
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqno5nn/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqno5nn
       :body: My problem was that I did not check value==compare value and sometimes searches return prematurely as false positive of division to 1. But yes, it was a straightforward approach to take.
       :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqna63c/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqna63c
   :body: |-
     You guys are FAST. But since I see no Ruby solutions I'll still post mine:
 
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Fluffy_ribbit
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbx6d/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbx6d
     :body: |-
       ```ruby
       def check(sheet)
@@ -105,18 +105,18 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
   - :author: jschulenklopper
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnhhaw/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnhhaw
     :body: 'Here''s mine: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jschulenklopper/adventofcode/master/2017/day02/day02b.rb. Reasonably concise but still readable.'
     :replies:
     - :author: mentero
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqniwss/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqniwss
       :body: |-
         > Ruby
 
         and mine https://gist.github.com/mentero/3cce36ee20effcf1691992a00692c05c
       :replies: []
 - :author: disclosure5
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnb1mb/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnb1mb
   :body: |-
     [Ruby solution here](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/technion/aoc2017/master/two.rb).
 
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: jschulenklopper
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqne8n0/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqne8n0
     :body: |-
       Tip: `string.split(" ")` splits on any whitespace: spaces and tabs.
 
@@ -142,15 +142,15 @@
       ```
     :replies: []
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbarw/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbarw
     :body: "[deleted]"
     :replies:
     - :author: disclosure5
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbvmx/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnbvmx
       :body: Thanks ! I should have realised they would be tabs..
       :replies: []
   - :author: rkachowski
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqni74z/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqni74z
     :body: |-
       i was pretty similar. the same approach with different methods
 
@@ -159,11 +159,11 @@
       ```
     :replies:
     - :author: disclosure5
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnig0x/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnig0x
       :body: TIL that .lines is an existing function
       :replies: []
 - :author: "[deleted]"
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqomop6/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqomop6
   :body: |-
     Ruby is amazing!
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: disclosure5
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnffzu/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h0rnm/2017_day_2_solutions/dqnffzu
   :body: |-
     Following the rushed Ruby, [here's a hopefully nice Erlang answer.](https://github.com/technion/aoc2017/blob/master/two.erl). I don't really follow why line #26 is needed. The file does not end in a new line, but the split/2 seems to break out an empty list at the end anyway.
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2017/03.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqowh44/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqowh44
   :body: |-
     Ruby, part 1 - maths turned out to be a trap and I fell into it
 
@@ -74,15 +74,15 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: "[deleted]"
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoynk8/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoynk8
     :body: Oh my. Why do you write minified code?
     :replies:
     - :author: Unihedron
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoypai/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoypai
       :body: I'm in the mind set of code golfing because that is my only strength. When you are in unfamiliar territory, it's best to carry something you have with you.
       :replies: []
 - :author: mikefh
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoyh9r/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoyh9r
   :body: |-
     Ruby
 
@@ -253,18 +253,18 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: Unihedron
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoz9yp/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoz9yp
     :body: I'm still new to ruby, and it didn't occur to me that an approach like finding all nearby squares every round instead of handling them per case exists. I learned ( / promptly looked up) a lot of interesting things about ruby in attempt to understand your code. Thank you for sharing and well done! ^^
     :replies:
     - :author: mikefh
-      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqozwxc/
+      :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqozwxc
       :body: |-
         Thanks! And I'm pumped that it helped you uncover new features of the language. I considered using a ruby metaprogramming technique, but it would have hurt its clarity.
 
         Though, after seeing the other more-efficient strategies, I may rewrite after I digest the math.
       :replies: []
 - :author: nawap
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoyhbr/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqoyhbr
   :body: |-
     Ruby for problem 1
 
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
     ```
   :replies: []
 - :author: el_daniero
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqp6u3y/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqp6u3y
   :body: |-
     # Ruby
 
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@
     You can see it in its entirety [here](https://github.com/daniero/code-challenges/blob/master/aoc2017/ruby/03.rb)
   :replies: []
 - :author: andreesgor
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqtiv3v/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7h7ufl/2017_day_3_solutions/dqtiv3v
   :body: |-
     I honestly think this is the most bizarre - in all ways - solution here (Ruby)
 

data/data/solutions/reddit/ruby/2017/04.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 - :author: Unihedron
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqj92m/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqj92m
   :body: |-
     Ruby, #8 silver #4 gold (run with -x)
 
@@ -26,11 +26,11 @@
     PS: I now keep a [log series detailing my adventofcode adventure](https://github.com/Unihedro/workout/blob/master/adventofcode2017/entry1.md). If you're interested feel free to read it as I write more, if I do!
   :replies:
   - :author: topaz2078
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqnfky/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqnfky
     :body: Fun log series! It's always enlightening to see some stream-of-consciousness gut-reaction to the puzzles so I can try to improve them for next year.
     :replies: []
 - :author: Frizkie
-  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqo3ae/
+  :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqo3ae
   :body: |-
     Never code golfed before, but I gave it a try:
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
     ```
   :replies:
   - :author: jschulenklopper
-    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqr184/
+    :url: https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/7hf5xb/2017_day_4_solutions/dqqr184
     :body: |-
       You can trim some characters using `readlines()`. No need for a `split()` anymore: