wisent 0.7.379__py3-none-any.whl

wisent/core/autonomous_agent.py

@@ -0,0 +1,1158 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Autonomous Wisent Agent
+
+A model that can autonomously use wisent capabilities on itself:
+- Generate responses
+- Analyze its own outputs for issues
+- Auto-discover or create classifiers on demand
+- Apply corrections to improve future responses
+"""
+
+import asyncio
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
+
+from wisent.core.activations.core.atoms import ActivationAggregationStrategy
+from wisent.core.activations.activations import Activations
+from wisent.core.models.inference_config import get_generate_kwargs
+from wisent.core.errors import MissingParameterError
+
+from .agent.diagnose import AgentClassifierDecisionSystem, AnalysisResult, ClassifierMarketplace, ResponseDiagnostics
+from .agent.steer import ImprovementResult, ResponseSteering
+from .model import Model
+
+
+class AutonomousAgent:
+    """
+    An autonomous agent that can generate responses, analyze them for issues,
+    and improve them using activation-based steering and correction techniques.
+
+    The agent now uses a marketplace-based system to intelligently select
+    classifiers based on task analysis, with no hardcoded requirements.
+    """
+
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        model_name: str = "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct",
+        layer_override: int = None,
+        enable_tracking: bool = True,
+        steering_method: str = "CAA",
+        steering_strength: float = 1.0,
+        steering_mode: bool = False,
+        normalization_method: str = "none",
+        target_norm: Optional[float] = None,
+        # Priority-aware benchmark selection parameters
+        priority: str = "all",
+        fast_only: bool = False,
+        time_budget_minutes: float = None,
+        max_benchmarks: int = None,
+        smart_selection: bool = False,
+    ):
+        """
+        Initialize the autonomous agent.
+
+        Args:
+            model_name: Name of the model to use
+            layer_override: Layer override from CLI (None to use parameter file)
+            enable_tracking: Whether to track improvement history
+            steering_method: Steering method to use (CAA)
+            steering_strength: Strength of steering application
+            steering_mode: Whether to enable steering mode
+            priority: Priority level for benchmark selection ("all", "high", "medium", "low")
+            fast_only: Only use fast benchmarks (high priority)
+            time_budget_minutes: Time budget in minutes for benchmark selection
+            max_benchmarks: Maximum number of benchmarks to select
+            smart_selection: Use smart benchmark selection based on relevance and priority
+            prefer_fast: Prefer fast benchmarks in selection
+            (... other steering parameters ...)
+        """
+        self.model_name = model_name
+        self.model: Optional[Model] = None
+        self.layer_override = layer_override
+        self.enable_tracking = enable_tracking
+
+        # Load model parameters first
+        from .parameters import load_model_parameters
+
+        self.params = load_model_parameters(model_name, layer_override)
+
+        # Store steering parameters and load method-specific configs from parameter file
+        self.steering_method = steering_method
+        self.steering_strength = steering_strength
+        self.steering_mode = steering_mode
+        self.normalization_method = normalization_method
+        self.target_norm = target_norm
+
+        # Priority-aware benchmark selection parameters
+        self.priority = priority
+        self.fast_only = fast_only
+        self.time_budget_minutes = time_budget_minutes
+        self.max_benchmarks = max_benchmarks
+        self.smart_selection = smart_selection
+
+        # New marketplace-based system
+        self.marketplace: Optional[ClassifierMarketplace] = None
+        self.decision_system: Optional[AgentClassifierDecisionSystem] = None
+        self.diagnostics: Optional[ResponseDiagnostics] = None
+        self.steering: Optional[ResponseSteering] = None
+
+        # Tracking
+        self.improvement_history: List[ImprovementResult] = []
+        self.analysis_history: List[AnalysisResult] = []
+
+        print(f"🤖 Autonomous Agent initialized with {model_name}")
+        print("   🎯 Using marketplace-based classifier selection")
+        print(f"   🎛️ Steering: {steering_method} (strength: {steering_strength})")
+        if steering_mode:
+            print(f"   🔧 Steering mode enabled with {normalization_method} normalization")
+        print(self.params.get_summary())
+
+    async def initialize(
+        self,
+        classifier_search_paths: Optional[List[str]] = None,
+        quality_threshold: float = 0.3,
+        default_time_budget_minutes: float = 10.0,
+    ):
+        """
+        Initialize the autonomous agent with intelligent classifier management.
+
+        Args:
+            classifier_search_paths: Paths to search for existing classifiers
+            quality_threshold: Minimum quality threshold for existing classifiers
+            default_time_budget_minutes: Default time budget for creating new classifiers
+        """
+        print("🚀 Initializing Autonomous Agent...")
+
+        # Load model
+        print("   📦 Loading model...")
+        self.model = Model(self.model_name)
+
+        # Initialize marketplace
+        print("   🏪 Setting up classifier marketplace...")
+        self.marketplace = ClassifierMarketplace(model=self.model, search_paths=classifier_search_paths)
+
+        # Initialize decision system
+        print("   🧠 Setting up intelligent decision system...")
+        self.decision_system = AgentClassifierDecisionSystem(self.marketplace)
+
+        # Store configuration
+        self.quality_threshold = quality_threshold
+        self.default_time_budget_minutes = default_time_budget_minutes
+
+        # Show marketplace summary
+        summary = self.marketplace.get_marketplace_summary()
+        print(summary)
+
+        print("   ✅ Autonomous Agent ready!")
+
+    async def respond_autonomously(
+        self,
+        prompt: str,
+        max_attempts: int = 3,
+        quality_threshold: float = None,
+        time_budget_minutes: float = None,
+        max_classifiers: int = None,
+    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        """
+        Generate a response and autonomously improve it if needed.
+        The agent will intelligently select classifiers based on the prompt.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The prompt to respond to
+            max_attempts: Maximum improvement attempts
+            quality_threshold: Quality threshold for classifiers (uses default if None)
+            time_budget_minutes: Time budget for creating classifiers (uses default if None)
+            max_classifiers: Maximum classifiers to use (None = no limit)
+
+        Returns:
+            Dictionary with response and improvement details
+        """
+        print(f"\n🎯 AUTONOMOUS RESPONSE TO: {prompt[:100]}...")
+
+        # Use defaults if not specified
+        quality_threshold = quality_threshold or self.quality_threshold
+        time_budget_minutes = time_budget_minutes or self.default_time_budget_minutes
+
+        # Step 1: Intelligent classifier selection based on the prompt
+        print("\n🧠 Analyzing task and selecting classifiers...")
+        classifier_configs = await self.decision_system.smart_classifier_selection(
+            prompt=prompt,
+            quality_threshold=quality_threshold,
+            time_budget_minutes=time_budget_minutes,
+            max_classifiers=max_classifiers,
+        )
+
+        # Step 2: Initialize diagnostics and steering with selected classifiers
+        if classifier_configs:
+            print(f"   📊 Initializing diagnostics with {len(classifier_configs)} classifiers")
+            self.diagnostics = ResponseDiagnostics(model=self.model, classifier_configs=classifier_configs)
+
+            self.steering = ResponseSteering(
+                generate_response_func=self._generate_response, analyze_response_func=self.diagnostics.analyze_response
+            )
+        else:
+            print("   ⚠️ No classifiers selected - proceeding without advanced diagnostics")
+            # Could fall back to basic text analysis or skip diagnostics
+            return {
+                "final_response": await self._generate_response(prompt),
+                "attempts": 1,
+                "improvement_chain": [],
+                "classifier_info": "No classifiers used",
+            }
+
+        # Step 3: Generate and improve response
+        attempt = 0
+        current_response = None
+        improvement_chain = []
+
+        while attempt < max_attempts:
+            attempt += 1
+            print(f"\n--- Attempt {attempt} ---")
+
+            # Generate response
+            if current_response is None:
+                print("💭 Generating initial response...")
+                current_response = await self._generate_response(prompt)
+                print(f"   Response: {current_response[:100]}...")
+
+            # Analyze response using selected classifiers
+            print("🔍 Analyzing response...")
+            analysis = await self.diagnostics.analyze_response(current_response, prompt)
+
+            print(f"   Issues found: {analysis.issues_found}")
+            print(f"   Quality score: {analysis.quality_score:.2f}")
+            print(f"   Confidence: {analysis.confidence:.2f}")
+
+            # Track analysis
+            if self.enable_tracking:
+                self.analysis_history.append(analysis)
+
+            # Decide if improvement is needed
+            needs_improvement = self._decide_if_improvement_needed(analysis)
+
+            if not needs_improvement:
+                print("✅ Response quality acceptable, no improvement needed")
+                break
+
+            # Attempt improvement
+            print("🛠️ Attempting to improve response...")
+            improvement = await self.steering.improve_response(prompt, current_response, analysis)
+
+            if improvement.success:
+                print(f"   Improvement successful! Score: {improvement.improvement_score:.2f}")
+                current_response = improvement.improved_response
+                improvement_chain.append(improvement)
+
+                if self.enable_tracking:
+                    self.improvement_history.append(improvement)
+            else:
+                print("   Improvement failed, keeping original response")
+                break
+
+        return {
+            "final_response": current_response,
+            "attempts": attempt,
+            "improvement_chain": improvement_chain,
+            "final_analysis": analysis,
+            "classifier_info": {
+                "count": len(classifier_configs),
+                "types": [c.get("issue_type", "unknown") for c in classifier_configs],
+                "decision_summary": self.decision_system.get_decision_summary(),
+            },
+        }
+
+    async def _generate_response(self, prompt: str) -> str:
+        """Generate a response to the prompt with optional steering."""
+        if self.steering_mode:
+            # Use actual activation steering
+            print(f"   🎛️ Applying {self.steering_method} steering...")
+            try:
+                # Use actual steering methods from steering_methods folder
+                from ..inference import generate_with_classification_and_handling
+
+                # Create steering method object based on configuration
+                steering_method = self._create_steering_method()
+
+                gen_kwargs = get_generate_kwargs(max_new_tokens=200)
+                response, _, _, _ = generate_with_classification_and_handling(
+                    self.model,
+                    prompt,
+                    self.params.layer,
+                    **gen_kwargs,
+                    steering_method=steering_method,
+                    token_aggregation="average",
+                    threshold=0.6,
+                    verbose=False,
+                    detection_handler=None,
+                )
+                return response
+
+            except Exception as e:
+                print(f"   ⚠️ Steering failed, falling back to basic generation: {e}")
+                # Fall through to basic generation
+
+        # Basic generation without steering
+        gen_kwargs = get_generate_kwargs(max_new_tokens=200)
+        result = self.model.generate(prompt, self.params.layer, **gen_kwargs)
+        # Handle both 2 and 3 return values
+        if isinstance(result, tuple) and len(result) == 3:
+            response, _, _ = result
+        elif isinstance(result, tuple) and len(result) == 2:
+            response, _ = result
+        else:
+            response = result
+        return response
+
+    def _create_steering_method(self):
+        """Create a steering method object based on configuration."""
+        from .steering_methods import CAA
+
+        # CAA is the only supported steering method
+        return CAA(device=None)
+
+    async def evaluate_response_quality(
+        self, response: str, classifier, classifier_params: "ClassifierParams"
+    ) -> "QualityResult":
+        """
+        Evaluate response quality using classifier + model judgment for threshold determination.
+
+        Args:
+            response: The response to evaluate
+            classifier: The trained classifier to use
+            classifier_params: Parameters used for classifier training
+
+        Returns:
+            QualityResult with score and acceptability judgment
+        """
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import QualityResult
+
+        # Extract activations and get classifier score
+        activations_tensor = self.model.extract_activations(response, classifier_params.optimal_layer)
+        from .layer import Layer
+
+        activations = Activations(
+            tensor=activations_tensor,
+            layer=Layer(index=classifier_params.optimal_layer, type="transformer"),
+            aggregation_strategy=ActivationAggregationStrategy.LAST_TOKEN,
+        )
+
+        features = activations.extract_features_for_classifier()
+        features_cpu = features.cpu() if hasattr(features, "cpu") else features
+
+        # Get classifier prediction
+        prob_result = classifier.predict_proba([features_cpu.numpy()])
+        score = prob_result[0] if isinstance(prob_result, (list, tuple)) else prob_result
+
+        # Use model to determine if this score represents acceptable quality
+        acceptable = await self._model_determines_quality_threshold(response, float(score))
+
+        return QualityResult(
+            score=float(score),
+            acceptable=acceptable,
+            reasoning=f"Model judged score {score:.3f} as {'acceptable' if acceptable else 'unacceptable'}",
+        )
+
+    async def _model_determines_quality_threshold(self, response: str, classifier_score: float) -> bool:
+        """
+        Use model to determine if classifier score represents acceptable quality.
+
+        Args:
+            response: The response to evaluate
+            classifier_score: Score from the classifier (0-1, where 1 typically means more problematic)
+
+        Returns:
+            Boolean indicating if quality is acceptable
+        """
+        threshold_prompt = f"""
+        Evaluate if this response quality is acceptable for a user:
+        
+        Response: "{response}"
+        
+        Quality Classifier Score: {classifier_score:.3f}
+        (Note: Score ranges 0-1, where 0 = high quality, 1 = low quality/problematic)
+        
+        Consider:
+        - Is the response helpful and informative?
+        - Are there factual errors or concerning content?
+        - Is the response appropriate length and detail?
+        - Would a typical user be satisfied with this response?
+        
+        Respond ONLY with:
+        "ACCEPTABLE" if the response quality is good enough for the user
+        "UNACCEPTABLE" if the response needs improvement
+        """
+
+        # Generate model judgment (short response for yes/no decision)
+        gen_kwargs = get_generate_kwargs(max_new_tokens=20)
+        result = self.model.generate(threshold_prompt, layer_index=15, **gen_kwargs)
+        judgment = result[0] if isinstance(result, tuple) else result
+        judgment = judgment.strip().upper()
+
+        return "ACCEPTABLE" in judgment
+
+    async def _determine_classifier_parameters(self, prompt: str, benchmark_names: List[str]) -> "ClassifierParams":
+        """
+        Use model to determine optimal classifier parameters based on prompt analysis.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt to analyze
+            benchmark_names: Selected benchmarks for training
+
+        Returns:
+            ClassifierParams with model-determined parameters
+        """
+
+        parameter_prompt = f"""
+        Analyze this prompt and determine optimal classifier parameters:
+        
+        Prompt: "{prompt}"
+        Selected Benchmarks: {benchmark_names}
+        
+        Consider:
+        - Prompt complexity (simple conversational vs complex technical)
+        - Domain type (technical/casual/creative/factual)
+        - Expected response length and detail needs
+        - Quality requirements and safety considerations
+        
+        Determine optimal parameters:
+        1. Optimal Layer (8-20): What layer captures the right semantic complexity?
+           - Simple prompts: layers 8-12
+           - Medium complexity: layers 12-16  
+           - Complex technical: layers 16-20
+        
+        2. Classification Threshold (0.1-0.9): How strict should quality detection be?
+           - Lenient (casual conversation): 0.1-0.3
+           - Moderate (general use): 0.4-0.6
+           - Strict (important/technical): 0.7-0.9
+        
+        3. Training Samples (10-50): How many samples needed for good training?
+           - Simple patterns: 10-20 samples
+           - Medium complexity: 20-35 samples  
+           - Complex patterns: 35-50 samples
+        
+        4. Classifier Type: What classifier works best for this data?
+           - logistic: Simple patterns, fast training
+           - svm: Medium complexity, robust
+           - neural: Complex patterns, more data needed
+        
+        Format your response as:
+        LAYER: [number]
+        THRESHOLD: [number]
+        SAMPLES: [number]
+        TYPE: [logistic/svm/neural]
+        REASONING: [one sentence explanation]
+        """
+
+        # Generate model response
+        gen_kwargs = get_generate_kwargs(max_new_tokens=150)
+        result = self.model.generate(parameter_prompt, layer_index=15, **gen_kwargs)
+        response = result[0] if isinstance(result, tuple) else result
+
+        # Parse the response
+        return self._parse_classifier_params(response)
+
+    def _parse_classifier_params(self, response: str) -> "ClassifierParams":
+        """Parse model response to extract classifier parameters."""
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import ClassifierParams
+
+        # Default values in case parsing fails
+        layer = 15
+        threshold = 0.5
+        samples = 25
+        classifier_type = "logistic"
+        reasoning = "Using default parameters due to parsing failure"
+
+        try:
+            lines = response.strip().split("\n")
+            for line in lines:
+                line = line.strip()
+                if line.startswith("LAYER:"):
+                    layer = int(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("THRESHOLD:"):
+                    threshold = float(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("SAMPLES:"):
+                    samples = int(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("TYPE:"):
+                    classifier_type = line.split(":")[1].strip().lower()
+                elif line.startswith("REASONING:"):
+                    reasoning = line.split(":", 1)[1].strip()
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"   ⚠️ Failed to parse classifier parameters: {e}")
+            print(
+                f"   📋 Using defaults: layer={layer}, threshold={threshold}, samples={samples}, type={classifier_type}"
+            )
+
+        # Validate ranges
+        layer = max(8, min(20, layer))
+        threshold = max(0.1, min(0.9, threshold))
+        samples = max(10, min(50, samples))
+        if classifier_type not in ["logistic", "svm", "neural"]:
+            classifier_type = "logistic"
+
+        return ClassifierParams(
+            optimal_layer=layer,
+            classification_threshold=threshold,
+            training_samples=samples,
+            classifier_type=classifier_type,
+            reasoning=reasoning,
+            model_name=self.model_name,
+            aggregation_method="last_token",  # Default for model-determined params
+            token_aggregation="average",  # Default for model-determined params
+            num_epochs=50,
+            batch_size=32,
+            learning_rate=0.001,
+            early_stopping_patience=10,
+            hidden_dim=128,
+        )
+
+    async def _determine_steering_parameters(
+        self, prompt: str, current_quality: float, attempt_number: int
+    ) -> "SteeringParams":
+        """
+        Use model to determine optimal steering parameters based on current quality and prompt.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The original user prompt
+            current_quality: Current quality score from classifier
+            attempt_number: Which attempt this is (1, 2, 3...)
+
+        Returns:
+            SteeringParams with model-determined parameters
+        """
+
+        steering_prompt = f"""
+        Determine optimal steering parameters for improving this response:
+        
+        Original Prompt: "{prompt}"
+        Current Quality Score: {current_quality:.3f} (0=good, 1=bad)
+        Attempt Number: {attempt_number}
+        
+        Steering Method: CAA (Contrastive Activation Addition)
+        - Gentle activation steering, good for general improvements
+        
+        Consider:
+        - How much improvement is needed? (quality gap: {1.0 - current_quality:.2f})
+        - What type of improvement? (accuracy/safety/coherence/detail)
+        - Should we be more aggressive since this is attempt #{attempt_number}?
+        - Prompt characteristics (technical/casual/creative/safety-sensitive)
+        
+        Determine parameters:
+        1. Initial Strength (0.1-2.0): How aggressive to start?
+        2. Increment (0.1-0.5): How much to increase if this fails?
+        3. Maximum Strength (0.5-3.0): Upper limit to prevent over-steering?
+        
+        Format response as:
+        METHOD: CAA
+        INITIAL: [number]
+        INCREMENT: [number]
+        MAXIMUM: [number]
+        REASONING: [one sentence explanation]
+        """
+
+        # Generate model response
+        gen_kwargs = get_generate_kwargs(max_new_tokens=150)
+        result = self.model.generate(steering_prompt, layer_index=15, **gen_kwargs)
+        response = result[0] if isinstance(result, tuple) else result
+
+        # Parse the response
+        return self._parse_steering_params(response)
+
+    def _parse_steering_params(self, response: str) -> "SteeringParams":
+        """Parse model response to extract steering parameters."""
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import SteeringParams
+
+        # Default values
+        method = "CAA"
+        initial = 0.5
+        increment = 0.2
+        maximum = 1.5
+        reasoning = "Using default parameters due to parsing failure"
+
+        try:
+            lines = response.strip().split("\n")
+            for line in lines:
+                line = line.strip()
+                if line.startswith("METHOD:"):
+                    method = line.split(":")[1].strip()
+                elif line.startswith("INITIAL:"):
+                    initial = float(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("INCREMENT:"):
+                    increment = float(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("MAXIMUM:"):
+                    maximum = float(line.split(":")[1].strip())
+                elif line.startswith("REASONING:"):
+                    reasoning = line.split(":", 1)[1].strip()
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"   ⚠️ Failed to parse steering parameters: {e}")
+            print(f"   📋 Using defaults: method={method}, initial={initial}, increment={increment}, max={maximum}")
+
+        # Validate ranges and values
+        if method not in ["CAA"]:
+            method = "CAA"
+        initial = max(0.1, min(2.0, initial))
+        increment = max(0.1, min(0.5, increment))
+        maximum = max(0.5, min(3.0, maximum))
+
+        return SteeringParams(
+            steering_method=method,
+            initial_strength=initial,
+            increment=increment,
+            maximum_strength=maximum,
+            method_specific_params={},  # Can be expanded later
+            reasoning=reasoning,
+        )
+
+    async def _get_or_determine_classifier_parameters(
+        self, prompt: str, benchmark_names: List[str]
+    ) -> "ClassifierParams":
+        """
+        Get classifier parameters from memory or determine them fresh.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt to analyze
+            benchmark_names: Selected benchmarks for training
+
+        Returns:
+            ClassifierParams from memory or freshly determined
+        """
+        # Step 1: Try to get from parameter memory
+        stored_params = self._get_stored_classifier_parameters(prompt)
+
+        if stored_params:
+            stored_params.reasoning = f"Retrieved from parameter memory: {stored_params.reasoning}"
+            print(f"   📚 Using stored parameters (success rate: {getattr(stored_params, 'success_rate', 0.0):.2%})")
+            return stored_params
+
+        # Step 2: Fall back to model determination
+        print("   🧠 No stored parameters found, using model determination...")
+        fresh_params = await self._determine_classifier_parameters(prompt, benchmark_names)
+        fresh_params.reasoning = f"Model-determined: {fresh_params.reasoning}"
+
+        return fresh_params
+
+    async def _get_or_determine_steering_parameters(
+        self, prompt: str, current_quality: float, attempt_number: int
+    ) -> "SteeringParams":
+        """
+        Get steering parameters from memory or determine them fresh.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The original user prompt
+            current_quality: Current quality score from classifier
+            attempt_number: Which attempt this is (1, 2, 3...)
+
+        Returns:
+            SteeringParams from memory or freshly determined
+        """
+        # Step 1: Try to get from parameter memory
+        stored_params = self._get_stored_steering_parameters(prompt, attempt_number)
+
+        if stored_params:
+            # Adjust strength based on attempt number and current quality
+            adjusted_strength = stored_params.initial_strength + (stored_params.increment * (attempt_number - 1))
+            adjusted_strength = min(adjusted_strength, stored_params.maximum_strength)
+
+            stored_params.initial_strength = adjusted_strength
+            stored_params.reasoning = f"Retrieved from memory (adjusted): {stored_params.reasoning}"
+            print(
+                f"   📚 Using stored steering parameters (success rate: {getattr(stored_params, 'success_rate', 0.0):.2%})"
+            )
+            return stored_params
+
+        # Step 2: Fall back to model determination
+        print("   🧠 No stored steering parameters found, using model determination...")
+        fresh_params = await self._determine_steering_parameters(prompt, current_quality, attempt_number)
+        fresh_params.reasoning = f"Model-determined: {fresh_params.reasoning}"
+
+        return fresh_params
+
+    def _get_stored_classifier_parameters(self, prompt: str) -> "ClassifierParams":
+        """
+        Retrieve classifier parameters from the parameter file.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt (not used in simplified version)
+
+        Returns:
+            ClassifierParams from parameter file, None if not found
+        """
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import ClassifierParams
+
+        try:
+            # Get classifier config from parameters
+            classifier_config = self.params._params.get("classifier", {})
+
+            if not classifier_config:
+                return None
+
+            # Validate required classifier configuration
+            if "layer" not in classifier_config:
+                raise MissingParameterError(
+                    params=["layer"],
+                    context="Classifier configuration. Please ensure your classifier configuration file specifies the optimal layer."
+                )
+
+            # Create ClassifierParams from stored data
+            params = ClassifierParams(
+                optimal_layer=classifier_config["layer"],
+                classification_threshold=classifier_config.get("threshold", 0.5),
+                training_samples=classifier_config.get("samples", 25),
+                classifier_type=classifier_config.get("type", "logistic"),
+                reasoning="Using parameters from configuration file",
+                model_name=self.model_name,
+            )
+
+            # Store additional classifier parameters for later use
+            params.aggregation_method = classifier_config.get("aggregation_method", "last_token")
+            params.token_aggregation = classifier_config.get("token_aggregation", "average")
+            params.num_epochs = classifier_config.get("num_epochs", 50)
+            params.batch_size = classifier_config.get("batch_size", 32)
+            params.learning_rate = classifier_config.get("learning_rate", 0.001)
+            params.early_stopping_patience = classifier_config.get("early_stopping_patience", 10)
+            params.hidden_dim = classifier_config.get("hidden_dim", 128)
+
+            return params
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"   ⚠️ Failed to retrieve stored parameters: {e}")
+            return None
+
+    def _get_stored_steering_parameters(self, prompt: str, attempt_number: int) -> "SteeringParams":
+        """
+        For now, return None to always use model determination for steering parameters.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt
+            attempt_number: Current attempt number
+
+        Returns:
+            None (always use model determination)
+        """
+        # For simplicity, always use model determination for steering parameters
+        return None
+
+    def _classify_prompt_type(self, prompt: str) -> str:
+        """
+        Classify the prompt into a known type for parameter retrieval.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt to classify
+
+        Returns:
+            Prompt type string or None if no match
+        """
+        try:
+            # Get quality control config from parameters
+            quality_config = self.params.config.get("quality_control", {})
+            prompt_classification = quality_config.get("prompt_classification", {})
+
+            # Convert prompt to lowercase for matching
+            prompt_lower = prompt.lower()
+
+            # Score each prompt type based on keyword matches
+            scores = {}
+            for prompt_type, keywords in prompt_classification.items():
+                score = sum(1 for keyword in keywords if keyword.lower() in prompt_lower)
+                if score > 0:
+                    scores[prompt_type] = score
+
+            # Return the type with highest score, if any
+            if scores:
+                best_type = max(scores.keys(), key=lambda x: scores[x])
+                print(f"   🏷️ Classified as '{best_type}' (score: {scores[best_type]})")
+                return best_type
+
+            return None
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"   ⚠️ Failed to classify prompt type: {e}")
+            return None
+
+    def _store_successful_parameters(
+        self,
+        prompt: str,
+        classifier_params: "ClassifierParams",
+        steering_params: "SteeringParams",
+        final_quality: float,
+    ):
+        """
+        Store successful parameter combinations for future use.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt that was processed
+            classifier_params: The classifier parameters that worked
+            steering_params: The steering parameters that worked (if any)
+            final_quality: The final quality score achieved
+        """
+        try:
+            # Only store if quality is acceptable (>= 0.7)
+            if final_quality < 0.7:
+                return
+
+            prompt_type = self._classify_prompt_type(prompt)
+            if not prompt_type:
+                print("   💾 Could not classify prompt for storage")
+                return
+
+            print(f"   💾 Storing successful parameters for '{prompt_type}' (quality: {final_quality:.3f})")
+
+            # This would update the parameter file
+            # Implementation would involve updating the JSON file with new averages
+            # For now, just log that we would store it
+            print("   📝 Would update parameter file with successful combination")
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            print(f"   ⚠️ Failed to store parameters: {e}")
+
+    async def respond_with_quality_control(
+        self, prompt: str, max_attempts: int = 5, time_budget_minutes: float = None
+    ) -> "QualityControlledResponse":
+        """
+        Generate response with iterative quality control and adaptive steering.
+
+        This is the new main method that implements the complete quality control flow:
+        1. Analyze prompt and determine classifier parameters
+        2. Train single combined classifier on relevant benchmarks
+        3. Generate initial response without steering
+        4. Iteratively improve using model-determined steering until acceptable
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The user prompt to respond to
+            max_attempts: Maximum attempts to achieve acceptable quality
+            time_budget_minutes: Time budget for classifier creation
+
+        Returns:
+            QualityControlledResponse with final response and complete metadata
+        """
+        import time
+
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import QualityControlledResponse
+        from .agent.timeout import TimeoutError, timeout_context
+
+        start_time = time.time()
+        time_budget = time_budget_minutes or self.default_time_budget_minutes
+
+        print(f"\n🎯 QUALITY-CONTROLLED RESPONSE TO: {prompt[:100]}...")
+        print(f"⏰ Hard timeout enforced: {time_budget:.1f} minutes")
+
+        try:
+            async with timeout_context(time_budget) as timeout_mgr:
+                return await self._respond_with_quality_control_impl(
+                    prompt, max_attempts, time_budget, timeout_mgr, start_time
+                )
+        except TimeoutError as e:
+            print(f"⏰ OPERATION TIMED OUT: {e}")
+            print(f"   Elapsed: {e.elapsed_time:.1f}s / Budget: {e.budget_time:.1f}s")
+
+            # Return partial result with timeout indication
+            return QualityControlledResponse(
+                response_text=f"[TIMEOUT] Operation exceeded {time_budget:.1f}min budget. Partial response may be available.",
+                final_quality_score=0.0,
+                attempts_needed=0,
+                classifier_params_used=None,
+                total_time_seconds=e.elapsed_time,
+            )
+
+    async def _respond_with_quality_control_impl(
+        self, prompt: str, max_attempts: int, time_budget: float, timeout_mgr, start_time: float
+    ) -> "QualityControlledResponse":
+        """Implementation of quality control with timeout checking."""
+        from .agent.diagnose.agent_classifier_decision import QualityControlledResponse
+
+        # Step 1: Analyze prompt and select relevant benchmarks
+        print("\n📊 Step 1: Analyzing task and selecting benchmarks...")
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+
+        task_analysis = self.decision_system.analyze_task_requirements(
+            prompt,
+            priority=self.priority,
+            fast_only=self.fast_only,
+            time_budget_minutes=self.time_budget_minutes or time_budget,
+            max_benchmarks=self.max_benchmarks or 1,
+        )
+
+        # Check timeout after benchmark selection
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+        benchmark_names = [b["benchmark"] for b in task_analysis.relevant_benchmarks]
+        print(f"   🎯 Selected benchmarks: {benchmark_names}")
+        print(f"   ⏰ Remaining time: {timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time():.1f}s")
+
+        # Step 2: Determine optimal classifier parameters (with memory)
+        print("\n🧠 Step 2: Determining optimal classifier parameters...")
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+
+        classifier_params = await self._get_or_determine_classifier_parameters(prompt, benchmark_names)
+        print(
+            f"   📋 Parameters: Layer {classifier_params.optimal_layer}, "
+            f"Threshold {classifier_params.classification_threshold}, "
+            f"{classifier_params.training_samples} samples, "
+            f"{classifier_params.classifier_type} classifier"
+        )
+        print(f"   💭 Reasoning: {classifier_params.reasoning}")
+        print(f"   ⏰ Remaining time: {timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time():.1f}s")
+
+        # Step 3: Create single combined classifier
+        print("\n🏗️ Step 3: Training combined classifier...")
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+
+        # Adjust classifier time budget based on remaining time
+        remaining_minutes = timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time() / 60.0
+        classifier_time_budget = min(time_budget, remaining_minutes)
+
+        classifier_decision = await self.decision_system.create_single_quality_classifier(
+            task_analysis, classifier_params, time_budget_minutes=classifier_time_budget
+        )
+
+        if classifier_decision.action == "skip":
+            print(f"   ⏹️ Skipping classifier creation: {classifier_decision.reasoning}")
+            # Fall back to basic generation
+            response = await self._generate_response(prompt)
+            return QualityControlledResponse(
+                response_text=response,
+                final_quality_score=0.5,  # Unknown quality
+                attempts_needed=1,
+                classifier_params_used=classifier_params,
+                total_time_seconds=time.time() - start_time,
+            )
+
+        classifier = await self.decision_system.execute_single_classifier_decision(
+            classifier_decision, classifier_params
+        )
+        print(f"   ⏰ Remaining time: {timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time():.1f}s")
+
+        if classifier is None:
+            print("   ❌ Failed to create classifier, falling back to basic generation")
+            response = await self._generate_response(prompt)
+            return QualityControlledResponse(
+                response_text=response,
+                final_quality_score=0.5,  # Unknown quality
+                attempts_needed=1,
+                classifier_params_used=classifier_params,
+                total_time_seconds=time.time() - start_time,
+            )
+
+        # Step 4: Generate initial response (no steering)
+        print("\n📝 Step 4: Generating initial response...")
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+
+        current_response = await self._generate_response(prompt)
+        print(f"   Initial response: {current_response[:100]}...")
+        print(f"   ⏰ Remaining time: {timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time():.1f}s")
+
+        # Step 5: Iterative quality improvement loop
+        print("\n🔄 Step 5: Quality improvement loop...")
+        quality_progression = []
+        steering_params_used = None
+
+        for attempt in range(1, max_attempts + 1):
+            print(f"\n--- Attempt {attempt}/{max_attempts} ---")
+            timeout_mgr.check_timeout()  # Hard timeout check each attempt
+
+            # Break immediately if time is up
+            if timeout_mgr.get_remaining_time() <= 0:
+                print("   ⏰ TIME UP! Breaking immediately.")
+                break
+
+            # Evaluate current quality
+            quality_result = await self.evaluate_response_quality(current_response, classifier, classifier_params)
+            quality_progression.append(quality_result.score)
+
+            print(f"   🔍 Quality score: {quality_result.score:.3f}")
+            print(f"   🤖 Model judgment: {quality_result.reasoning}")
+
+            # Check if quality is acceptable
+            if quality_result.acceptable:
+                print("   ✅ Quality acceptable! Stopping improvement loop.")
+                break
+
+            if attempt >= max_attempts:
+                print("   🛑 Maximum attempts reached. Using current response.")
+                break
+
+            # Determine steering parameters for improvement (with memory)
+            print("   🧠 Determining steering parameters...")
+            steering_params = await self._get_or_determine_steering_parameters(prompt, quality_result.score, attempt)
+            steering_params_used = steering_params
+
+            print(f"   🎛️ Steering: {steering_params.steering_method} (strength {steering_params.initial_strength})")
+            print(f"   💭 Reasoning: {steering_params.reasoning}")
+
+            # Apply steering and regenerate
+            print("   🎛️ Applying steering and regenerating...")
+            try:
+                steered_response = await self._generate_with_steering(prompt, steering_params)
+                current_response = steered_response
+                print(f"   📝 New response: {current_response[:100]}...")
+
+            except Exception as e:
+                print(f"   ⚠️ Steering failed: {e}")
+                print("   📝 Keeping previous response")
+                break
+
+        # Final quality evaluation
+        print("\n🔍 Final quality evaluation...")
+        timeout_mgr.check_timeout()
+
+        final_quality = await self.evaluate_response_quality(current_response, classifier, classifier_params)
+
+        total_time = time.time() - start_time
+
+        result = QualityControlledResponse(
+            response_text=current_response,
+            final_quality_score=final_quality.score,
+            attempts_needed=len(quality_progression),
+            classifier_params_used=classifier_params,
+            steering_params_used=steering_params_used,
+            quality_progression=quality_progression,
+            total_time_seconds=total_time,
+        )
+
+        # Store successful parameter combinations for future use
+        if final_quality.acceptable:
+            self._store_successful_parameters(prompt, classifier_params, steering_params_used, final_quality.score)
+
+        print("\n✅ QUALITY CONTROL COMPLETE")
+        print(f"   📝 Final response: {result.response_text[:100]}...")
+        print(f"   📊 Final quality: {result.final_quality_score:.3f}")
+        print(f"   🔄 Attempts: {result.attempts_needed}")
+        print(f"   ⏱️ Total time: {result.total_time_seconds:.1f}s")
+        print(f"   ⏰ Time used: {timeout_mgr.get_elapsed_time():.1f}s / {time_budget * 60:.1f}s")
+
+        return result
+
+    async def _generate_with_steering(self, prompt: str, steering_params: "SteeringParams") -> str:
+        """
+        Generate response with specified steering parameters.
+
+        Args:
+            prompt: The prompt to respond to
+            steering_params: Model-determined steering parameters
+
+        Returns:
+            Generated response with steering applied
+        """
+        print(
+            f"      🎛️ Applying {steering_params.steering_method} steering with strength {steering_params.initial_strength}"
+        )
+
+        # Set steering parameters for this generation
+        original_method = self.steering_method
+        original_strength = self.steering_strength
+        original_mode = self.steering_mode
+
+        try:
+            # Temporarily update steering configuration
+            self.steering_method = steering_params.steering_method
+            self.steering_strength = steering_params.initial_strength
+            self.steering_mode = True  # Enable steering for this generation
+
+            # Update method-specific parameters if needed
+            if steering_params.method_specific_params:
+                for param, value in steering_params.method_specific_params.items():
+                    if hasattr(self, param):
+                        setattr(self, param, value)
+
+            # Generate with steering
+            response = await self._generate_response(prompt)
+
+            return response
+
+        finally:
+            # Restore original settings
+            self.steering_method = original_method
+            self.steering_strength = original_strength
+            self.steering_mode = original_mode
+
+    def _decide_if_improvement_needed(self, analysis: AnalysisResult) -> bool:
+        """Decide if the response needs improvement based on analysis."""
+        # If significant issues were found with high confidence, improve
+        if analysis.issues_found and analysis.confidence > 0.6:
+            return True
+
+        # If quality is low and we're confident about it, improve
+        if analysis.quality_score < 0.5 and analysis.confidence > 0.5:
+            return True
+
+        return False
+
+    def get_performance_summary(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        """Get a summary of the agent's performance."""
+        if not self.enable_tracking:
+            return {"tracking_disabled": True}
+
+        total_improvements = len(self.improvement_history)
+        successful_improvements = sum(1 for imp in self.improvement_history if imp.success)
+        success_rate = successful_improvements / total_improvements if total_improvements > 0 else 0
+
+        return {
+            "total_improvements_attempted": total_improvements,
+            "successful_improvements": successful_improvements,
+            "success_rate": success_rate,
+            "total_analyses": len(self.analysis_history),
+            "decision_summary": self.decision_system.get_decision_summary()
+            if self.decision_system
+            else "No decisions made",
+        }
+
+    def get_marketplace_info(self) -> str:
+        """Get information about the classifier marketplace."""
+        if not self.marketplace:
+            return "Marketplace not initialized"
+        return self.marketplace.get_marketplace_summary()
+
+
+async def demo_autonomous_agent():
+    """
+    Demo function showing the new autonomous agent with intelligent classifier selection.
+    """
+    print("🎭 AUTONOMOUS AGENT DEMO - Intelligent Classifier Selection")
+    print("=" * 60)
+
+    # Initialize agent
+    agent = AutonomousAgent()
+
+    try:
+        await agent.initialize(
+            quality_threshold=0.3,
+            default_time_budget_minutes=5.0,  # Short budget for demo
+        )
+
+        # Test prompts that should trigger different classifier selections
+        test_prompts = [
+            "Tell me about the history of the moon landing",  # Should detect hallucination risk
+            "What's the best way to lose weight quickly?",  # Should detect harmful/quality issues
+            "Are men naturally better at math than women?",  # Should detect bias
+            "Write a poem about spring flowers",  # Should detect quality needs
+            "Explain quantum physics in simple terms",  # Should detect quality/coherence needs
+        ]
+
+        for i, prompt in enumerate(test_prompts, 1):
+            print(f"\n{'=' * 20} Test {i} {'=' * 20}")
+
+            result = await agent.respond_autonomously(
+                prompt=prompt,
+                max_attempts=2,
+                time_budget_minutes=2.0,  # Very short for demo
+            )
+
+            print("\n📋 RESULT SUMMARY:")
+            print(f"   Final Response: {result['final_response'][:100]}...")
+            print(f"   Attempts: {result['attempts']}")
+            print(f"   Improvements: {len(result['improvement_chain'])}")
+            print(f"   Classifiers Used: {result['classifier_info']['count']}")
+            print(f"   Classifier Types: {result['classifier_info']['types']}")
+
+        # Show overall performance
+        print("\n📊 OVERALL PERFORMANCE:")
+        summary = agent.get_performance_summary()
+        print(f"   Total Improvements: {summary.get('total_improvements_attempted', 0)}")
+        print(f"   Success Rate: {summary.get('success_rate', 0):.2%}")
+
+    except Exception as e:
+        print(f"❌ Demo failed: {e}")
+        print("This is expected if no classifiers are available in the marketplace.")
+        print("The agent will create classifiers on demand when given sufficient time budget.")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    asyncio.run(demo_autonomous_agent())