passagemath-objects 10.6.46__cp314-cp314t-macosx_13_0_x86_64.whl

sage/misc/namespace_package.py

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# sage_setup: distribution = sagemath-objects
+"""
+Utility functions for namespace packages in Sage
+"""
+from importlib import import_module
+
+
+def install_doc(package, doc):
+    """
+    Install the docstring ``doc`` to the package.
+
+    TESTS:
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.namespace_package import install_doc
+        sage: install_doc('sage', 'hello')
+        sage: from inspect import getdoc
+        sage: getdoc(sage)
+        'hello'
+    """
+    pkg = import_module(package)
+    pkg.__doc__ = doc         # enable sage.package?
+    pkg.getdoc = lambda: doc  # enable help(sage.package)
+
+
+def install_dict(package, dic):
+    """
+    Install ``dic`` to the ``__dict__`` of the package.
+
+    TESTS:
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.namespace_package import install_dict
+        sage: install_dict('sage', {'greeting': 'hello'})
+        sage: sage.greeting
+        'hello'
+    """
+    pkg = import_module(package)
+    pkg.__dict__.update(dic)

sage/misc/nested_class.pxd

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# sage_setup: distribution = sagemath-objects
+cdef class NestedClassMetaclass(type):
+    pass

sage/misc/nested_class.pyx

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+# sage_setup: distribution = sagemath-objects
+"""
+Fixing pickle for nested classes
+
+As of Python 2.7, names for nested classes are set by Python in a way which is
+incompatible with the pickling of such classes (pickling by name)::
+
+    sage: class A:
+    ....:     class B:
+    ....:         pass
+    sage: A.B.__name__
+    'B'
+
+instead of more natural ``'A.B'``. Furthermore upon pickling *and* unpickling a
+class with name ``'A.B'`` in a module ``mod``, the standard cPickle module
+searches for ``'A.B'`` in ``mod.__dict__`` instead of looking up ``'A'`` and
+then ``'B'`` in the result. See: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/bHBV9KWAt64
+
+This module provides two utilities to workaround this issue:
+
+- :func:`nested_pickle` "fixes" recursively the name of the subclasses of a
+  class and inserts their fullname ``'A.B'`` in ``mod.__dict__``
+
+- :class:`NestedClassMetaclass` is a metaclass ensuring that
+  :func:`nested_pickle` is called on a class upon creation.
+
+See also :mod:`sage.misc.test_nested_class`.
+
+.. NOTE::
+
+    In Python 3, nested classes, like any class for that matter, have
+    ``__qualname__`` and the standard pickle module uses it for pickling and
+    unpickling. Thus the pickle module searches for ``'A.B'`` first by looking
+    up ``'A'`` in ``mod``, and then ``'B'`` in the result. So there is no
+    pickling problem for nested classes in Python 3, and the two utilities are
+    not really necessary. However, :class:`NestedClassMetaclass` is used widely
+    in Sage and affects behaviors of Sage objects in other respects than in
+    pickling and unpickling. Hence we keep :class:`NestedClassMetaclass` even
+    with Python 3, for now. This module will be removed when we eventually drop
+    support for Python 2.
+
+EXAMPLES::
+
+    sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import A1, nested_pickle
+
+    sage: A1.A2.A3.__name__
+    'A3'
+    sage: A1.A2.A3
+    <class 'sage.misc.nested_class.A1.A2.A3'>
+
+    sage: nested_pickle(A1)
+    <class 'sage.misc.nested_class.A1'>
+
+    sage: A1.A2
+    <class 'sage.misc.nested_class.A1.A2'>
+
+    sage: A1.A2.A3
+    <class 'sage.misc.nested_class.A1.A2.A3'>
+    sage: A1.A2.A3.__name__
+    'A1.A2.A3'
+
+    sage: sage.misc.nested_class.__dict__['A1.A2'] is A1.A2
+    True
+    sage: sage.misc.nested_class.__dict__['A1.A2.A3'] is A1.A2.A3
+    True
+
+All of this is not perfect. In the following scenario::
+
+    sage: class A1:
+    ....:     class A2:
+    ....:         pass
+    sage: class B1:
+    ....:     A2 = A1.A2
+
+    sage: nested_pickle(A1)
+    <class '__main__.A1'>
+    sage: nested_pickle(B1)
+    <class '__main__.B1'>
+    sage: A1.A2
+    <class '__main__.A1.A2'>
+    sage: B1.A2
+    <class '__main__.A1.A2'>
+
+The name for ``'A1.A2'`` could potentially be set to ``'B1.A2'``. But that will work anyway.
+"""
+
+import sys
+cdef dict sys_modules = sys.modules
+
+
+__all__ = ['modify_for_nested_pickle', 'nested_pickle',
+           'NestedClassMetaclass', 'MainClass'
+           # Comment out to silence Sphinx warning about nested classes.
+           # , 'SubClass', 'CopiedClass', 'A1'
+           ]
+
+cpdef modify_for_nested_pickle(cls, str name_prefix, module, first_run=True):
+    r"""
+    Modify the subclasses of the given class to be picklable, by
+    giving them a mangled name and putting the mangled name in the
+    module namespace.
+
+    INPUT:
+
+    - ``cls`` -- the class to modify
+
+    - ``name_prefix`` -- the prefix to prepend to the class name
+
+    - ``module`` -- the module object to modify with the mangled name
+
+    - ``first_run`` -- boolean (default: ``True``); whether or not
+      this function is run for the first time on ``cls``
+
+    NOTE:
+
+    This function would usually not be directly called. It is internally used
+    in :class:`NestedClassMetaclass`.
+
+    EXAMPLES::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import *
+        sage: class A():
+        ....:     class B():
+        ....:         pass
+        sage: module = sys.modules['__main__']
+        sage: A.B.__name__
+        'B'
+        sage: getattr(module, 'A.B', 'Not found')
+        'Not found'
+        sage: modify_for_nested_pickle(A, 'A', module)
+        sage: A.B.__name__
+        'A.B'
+        sage: getattr(module, 'A.B', 'Not found')
+        <class '__main__.A.B'>
+
+    Here we demonstrate the effect of the ``first_run`` argument::
+
+        sage: modify_for_nested_pickle(A, 'X', module)
+        sage: A.B.__name__  # nothing changed
+        'A.B'
+        sage: modify_for_nested_pickle(A, 'X', module, first_run=False)
+        sage: A.B.__name__
+        'X.A.B'
+
+    Note that the class is now found in the module under both its old and
+    its new name::
+
+        sage: getattr(module, 'A.B', 'Not found')
+        <class '__main__.A.B'>
+        sage: getattr(module, 'X.A.B', 'Not found')
+        <class '__main__.A.B'>
+
+    TESTS:
+
+    The following is a real life example, that was enabled by the internal
+    use of the``first_run`` in :issue:`9107`::
+
+        sage: cython_code = [
+        ....:  "from sage.structure.unique_representation import UniqueRepresentation",
+        ....:  "class A1(UniqueRepresentation):",
+        ....:  "    class B1(UniqueRepresentation):",
+        ....:  "        class C1: pass",
+        ....:  "    class B2:",
+        ....:  "        class C2: pass"]
+        sage: import os
+        sage: cython(os.linesep.join(cython_code))                                      # needs sage.misc.cython
+
+    Before :issue:`9107`, the name of ``A1.B1.C1`` would have been wrong::
+
+        sage: # needs sage.misc.cython
+        sage: A1.B1.C1.__name__
+        'A1.B1.C1'
+        sage: A1.B2.C2.__name__
+        'A1.B2.C2'
+        sage: A_module = sys.modules[A1.__module__]
+        sage: getattr(A_module, 'A1.B1.C1', 'Not found').__name__
+        'A1.B1.C1'
+        sage: getattr(A_module, 'A1.B2.C2', 'Not found').__name__
+        'A1.B2.C2'
+    """
+    cdef str name, dotted_name
+    cdef str mod_name = module.__name__
+    cdef str cls_name = cls.__name__+'.'
+    cdef str v_name
+    if first_run:
+        for (name, v) in cls.__dict__.items():
+            if isinstance(v, NestedClassMetaclass):
+                v_name = v.__name__
+                if v_name == name and v.__module__ == mod_name and getattr(module, v_name, None) is not v:
+                    # OK, probably this is a nested class.
+                    dotted_name = name_prefix + '.' + v_name
+                    setattr(module, dotted_name, v)
+                    modify_for_nested_pickle(v, name_prefix, module, False)
+                    v.__name__ = dotted_name
+            elif isinstance(v, type):
+                v_name = v.__name__
+                if v_name == name and v.__module__ == mod_name and getattr(module, v_name, None) is not v:
+                    # OK, probably this is a nested class.
+                    dotted_name = name_prefix + '.' + v_name
+                    setattr(module, dotted_name, v)
+                    modify_for_nested_pickle(v, dotted_name, module)
+                    v.__name__ = dotted_name
+    else:
+        for (name, v) in cls.__dict__.items():
+            if isinstance(v, type):
+                v_name = v.__name__
+                if v_name == cls_name + name and v.__module__ == mod_name:
+                    # OK, probably this is a nested class.
+                    dotted_name = name_prefix + '.' + v_name
+                    setattr(module, dotted_name, v)
+                    modify_for_nested_pickle(v, name_prefix, module, False)
+                    v.__name__ = dotted_name
+
+
+def nested_pickle(cls):
+    r"""
+    This decorator takes a class that potentially contains nested classes.
+    For each such nested class, its name is modified to a new illegal
+    identifier, and that name is set in the module.  For example, if
+    you have::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import nested_pickle
+        sage: module = sys.modules['__main__']
+        sage: class A():
+        ....:     class B:
+        ....:         pass
+        sage: nested_pickle(A)
+        <class '__main__.A'>
+
+    then the name of class ``'B'`` will be modified to ``'A.B'``, and the ``'A.B'``
+    attribute of the module will be set to class ``'B'``::
+
+        sage: A.B.__name__
+        'A.B'
+        sage: getattr(module, 'A.B', 'Not found')
+        <class '__main__.A.B'>
+
+    In Python 2.6, decorators work with classes; then ``@nested_pickle``
+    should work as a decorator::
+
+        sage: @nested_pickle    # todo: not implemented
+        ....: class A2():
+        ....:     class B:
+        ....:         pass
+        sage: A2.B.__name__    # todo: not implemented
+        'A2.B'
+        sage: getattr(module, 'A2.B', 'Not found')    # todo: not implemented
+        <class __main__.A2.B at ...>
+
+    EXAMPLES::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import *
+        sage: loads(dumps(MainClass.NestedClass())) # indirect doctest
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass object at 0x...>
+    """
+    modify_for_nested_pickle(cls, cls.__name__, sys_modules[cls.__module__])
+    return cls
+
+
+cdef class NestedClassMetaclass(type):
+    r"""
+    A metaclass for nested pickling.
+
+    Check that one can use a metaclass to ensure nested_pickle is called on any
+    derived subclass::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import NestedClassMetaclass
+        sage: class ASuperClass(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):
+        ....:     pass
+        sage: class A3(ASuperClass):
+        ....:     class B():
+        ....:         pass
+        sage: A3.B.__name__
+        'A3.B'
+        sage: getattr(sys.modules['__main__'], 'A3.B', 'Not found')
+        <class '__main__.A3.B'>
+    """
+    def __init__(self, *args):
+        r"""
+        This invokes the nested_pickle on construction.
+
+        EXAMPLES::
+
+            sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import NestedClassMetaclass
+            sage: class A(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):
+            ....:     class B():
+            ....:         pass
+            sage: A.B
+            <class '__main__.A.B'>
+            sage: getattr(sys.modules['__main__'], 'A.B', 'Not found')
+            <class '__main__.A.B'>
+        """
+        modify_for_nested_pickle(self, self.__name__, sys_modules[self.__module__])
+
+
+class MainClass(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):
+    r"""
+    A simple class to test nested_pickle.
+
+    EXAMPLES::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import *
+        sage: loads(dumps(MainClass()))
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass object at 0x...>
+    """
+
+    class NestedClass():
+        r"""
+        EXAMPLES::
+
+            sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import *
+            sage: loads(dumps(MainClass.NestedClass()))
+            <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass object at 0x...>
+        """
+
+        class NestedSubClass():
+            r"""
+            EXAMPLES::
+
+                sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import *
+                sage: loads(dumps(MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass()))
+                <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass object at 0x...>
+                sage: getattr(sage.misc.nested_class, 'MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass')
+                <class 'sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass'>
+                sage: MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass.__name__
+                'MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass'
+            """
+            def dummy(self, x, *args, r=(1, 2, 3.4), **kwds):
+                """
+                A dummy method to demonstrate the embedding of
+                method signature for nested classes.
+
+                TESTS::
+
+                    sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import MainClass
+                    sage: print(MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass.dummy.__doc__)
+                    NestedSubClass.dummy(self, x, *args, r=(1, 2, 3.4), **kwds)
+                    File: ...sage/misc/nested_class.pyx (starting at line ...)
+                    <BLANKLINE>
+                                    A dummy method to demonstrate the embedding of
+                                    method signature for nested classes.
+                    ...
+                """
+                pass
+
+
+class SubClass(MainClass):
+    r"""
+    A simple class to test nested_pickle.
+
+    EXAMPLES::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import SubClass
+        sage: loads(dumps(SubClass.NestedClass()))
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass object at 0x...>
+        sage: loads(dumps(SubClass()))
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.SubClass object at 0x...>
+    """
+    pass
+
+
+nested_pickle(SubClass)
+
+
+def _provide_SubClass():
+    return SubClass
+
+
+class CopiedClass():
+    r"""
+    A simple class to test nested_pickle.
+
+    EXAMPLES::
+
+        sage: from sage.misc.nested_class import CopiedClass
+        sage: loads(dumps(CopiedClass.NestedClass()))
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass object at 0x...>
+        sage: loads(dumps(CopiedClass.NestedSubClass()))
+        <sage.misc.nested_class.MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass object at 0x...>
+    """
+    NestedClass = MainClass.NestedClass
+    NestedSubClass = MainClass.NestedClass.NestedSubClass
+    SubClass = _provide_SubClass()
+
+
+nested_pickle(CopiedClass)
+
+
+# Further classes for recursive tests
+
+class A1:
+    class A2:
+        class A3:
+            pass