agent-os-kernel 1.1.0__py3-none-any.whl → 1.3.0__py3-none-any.whl

modules/scak/agent_kernel/semantic_analyzer.py

@@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
+"""
+Semantic Analyzer - Advanced refusal detection beyond regex patterns.
+
+This module provides semantic analysis of agent responses to detect
+"refusal" vs "compliance" behavior using contextual understanding
+rather than just pattern matching.
+"""
+
+import logging
+from typing import Optional, List
+
+from .models import SemanticAnalysis
+
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+class SemanticAnalyzer:
+    """
+    Analyzes agent responses semantically to detect refusal patterns.
+    
+    Unlike regex-based detection, this analyzes the semantic meaning
+    to catch subtle forms of giving up like:
+    - "I'm afraid those records are elusive at the moment."
+    - "The information seems to be unavailable."
+    - "It appears there's nothing to show."
+    
+    This is inspired by "Refusal Benchmarking" in AI safety research.
+    """
+    
+    def __init__(self):
+        """Initialize the semantic analyzer."""
+        self.refusal_indicators = self._load_refusal_indicators()
+        self.compliance_indicators = self._load_compliance_indicators()
+        
+    def _load_refusal_indicators(self) -> List[str]:
+        """Load semantic indicators of refusal/giving up."""
+        return [
+            # Direct refusal phrases
+            "cannot", "can't", "unable", "impossible", "won't",
+            "don't have", "doesn't exist", "not available", "unavailable",
+            
+            # Evasive/elusive language
+            "elusive", "appears to be", "seems to be", "might be",
+            "could be", "perhaps", "possibly", "unclear",
+            
+            # Uncertainty/hedging
+            "I'm afraid", "unfortunately", "regrettably", "sadly",
+            "it seems", "it appears", "looks like",
+            
+            # Empty/negative results
+            "no data", "no results", "no information", "nothing found",
+            "zero results", "empty", "none available",
+            
+            # Insufficient effort indicators
+            "not sure", "uncertain", "don't know", "can't tell",
+            "hard to say", "difficult to determine"
+        ]
+    
+    def _load_compliance_indicators(self) -> List[str]:
+        """Load semantic indicators of compliance/success."""
+        return [
+            # Action completion
+            "found", "discovered", "located", "identified", "retrieved",
+            "obtained", "extracted", "collected",
+            
+            # Data presentation
+            "here is", "here are", "the results", "the data shows",
+            "according to", "based on", "from the",
+            
+            # Quantity indicators
+            "total", "count", "number of", "records", "entries",
+            "items", "results show",
+            
+            # Confidence indicators
+            "successfully", "confirmed", "verified", "validated"
+        ]
+    
+    def analyze(
+        self,
+        agent_response: str,
+        user_prompt: str,
+        tool_telemetry: Optional[List] = None
+    ) -> SemanticAnalysis:
+        """
+        Perform semantic analysis on agent response.
+        
+        Args:
+            agent_response: The agent's response to analyze
+            user_prompt: The original user prompt for context
+            tool_telemetry: Optional tool execution telemetry
+            
+        Returns:
+            SemanticAnalysis with classification and confidence
+        """
+        response_lower = agent_response.lower()
+        prompt_lower = user_prompt.lower()
+        
+        # Calculate refusal and compliance scores
+        refusal_score = self._calculate_refusal_score(response_lower)
+        compliance_score = self._calculate_compliance_score(response_lower)
+        
+        # Check for tool execution context
+        tool_context_score = self._analyze_tool_context(tool_telemetry)
+        
+        # Determine if this is a refusal
+        is_refusal = self._determine_refusal(
+            refusal_score,
+            compliance_score,
+            tool_context_score,
+            response_lower
+        )
+        
+        # Calculate confidence based on multiple signals
+        confidence = self._calculate_confidence(
+            refusal_score,
+            compliance_score,
+            tool_context_score,
+            response_lower
+        )
+        
+        # Determine semantic category
+        category = self._determine_category(
+            is_refusal,
+            refusal_score,
+            compliance_score
+        )
+        
+        # Generate reasoning explanation
+        reasoning = self._generate_reasoning(
+            is_refusal,
+            refusal_score,
+            compliance_score,
+            tool_context_score,
+            response_lower
+        )
+        
+        return SemanticAnalysis(
+            is_refusal=is_refusal,
+            refusal_confidence=confidence,
+            semantic_category=category,
+            reasoning=reasoning
+        )
+    
+    def _calculate_refusal_score(self, response: str) -> float:
+        """Calculate refusal score based on indicators present."""
+        matches = sum(1 for indicator in self.refusal_indicators if indicator in response)
+        # Normalize to 0-1 range
+        return min(matches / 3.0, 1.0)  # 3+ matches = 1.0
+    
+    def _calculate_compliance_score(self, response: str) -> float:
+        """Calculate compliance score based on indicators present."""
+        matches = sum(1 for indicator in self.compliance_indicators if indicator in response)
+        # Normalize to 0-1 range
+        return min(matches / 3.0, 1.0)  # 3+ matches = 1.0
+    
+    def _analyze_tool_context(self, tool_telemetry: Optional[List]) -> float:
+        """
+        Analyze tool execution context.
+        
+        Returns a score indicating likelihood of laziness:
+        - 0.0: Tools called and returned data (not lazy)
+        - 0.5: Tools called but empty results (might be lazy)
+        - 1.0: Tools not called (likely lazy)
+        """
+        if not tool_telemetry:
+            return 0.7  # No telemetry suggests possible laziness
+        
+        from .models import ToolExecutionStatus
+        
+        # Check if any tools were called
+        called_tools = [t for t in tool_telemetry if t.tool_status != ToolExecutionStatus.NOT_CALLED]
+        
+        if not called_tools:
+            return 1.0  # No tools called - clear laziness
+        
+        # Check if tools returned empty results
+        empty_results = [t for t in called_tools if t.tool_status == ToolExecutionStatus.EMPTY_RESULT]
+        
+        if len(empty_results) == len(called_tools):
+            return 0.3  # All tools returned empty - likely legitimate
+        
+        # Mix of results
+        return 0.5
+    
+    def _determine_refusal(
+        self,
+        refusal_score: float,
+        compliance_score: float,
+        tool_context_score: float,
+        response: str
+    ) -> bool:
+        """
+        Determine if response indicates refusal.
+        
+        Uses multiple signals to make decision:
+        - Refusal language
+        - Lack of compliance language
+        - Tool execution context
+        - Response length
+        """
+        # Short responses with refusal language
+        if len(response) < 50 and refusal_score > 0.3:
+            return True
+        
+        # High refusal score and low compliance
+        if refusal_score > 0.5 and compliance_score < 0.2:
+            return True
+        
+        # High tool laziness (not called) + some refusal language
+        if tool_context_score > 0.7 and refusal_score > 0.2:
+            return True
+        
+        # Moderate refusal with no compliance
+        if refusal_score > 0.3 and compliance_score == 0.0:
+            return True
+        
+        return False
+    
+    def _calculate_confidence(
+        self,
+        refusal_score: float,
+        compliance_score: float,
+        tool_context_score: float,
+        response: str
+    ) -> float:
+        """
+        Calculate confidence in the refusal detection.
+        
+        Higher confidence when:
+        - Clear refusal indicators
+        - Clear tool context (called or not)
+        - Low ambiguity
+        """
+        # Base confidence from score differences
+        score_diff = abs(refusal_score - compliance_score)
+        base_confidence = min(score_diff + 0.5, 1.0)
+        
+        # Boost confidence if tool context is clear
+        if tool_context_score < 0.3 or tool_context_score > 0.7:
+            base_confidence = min(base_confidence + 0.1, 1.0)
+        
+        # Reduce confidence for very short responses (ambiguous)
+        if len(response) < 20:
+            base_confidence *= 0.8
+        
+        # Boost confidence for very clear patterns
+        if refusal_score > 0.7 or compliance_score > 0.7:
+            base_confidence = min(base_confidence + 0.15, 1.0)
+        
+        return round(base_confidence, 2)
+    
+    def _determine_category(
+        self,
+        is_refusal: bool,
+        refusal_score: float,
+        compliance_score: float
+    ) -> str:
+        """Determine semantic category of response."""
+        if is_refusal:
+            return "refusal"
+        
+        if compliance_score > 0.5:
+            return "compliance"
+        
+        if refusal_score > 0.2 and compliance_score > 0.2:
+            return "unclear"
+        
+        return "error"
+    
+    def _generate_reasoning(
+        self,
+        is_refusal: bool,
+        refusal_score: float,
+        compliance_score: float,
+        tool_context_score: float,
+        response: str
+    ) -> str:
+        """Generate human-readable reasoning for the classification."""
+        if is_refusal:
+            reasons = []
+            
+            if refusal_score > 0.5:
+                reasons.append(f"Strong refusal language detected (score: {refusal_score:.2f})")
+            elif refusal_score > 0.3:
+                reasons.append(f"Moderate refusal indicators present (score: {refusal_score:.2f})")
+            
+            if compliance_score < 0.2:
+                reasons.append(f"Low compliance indicators (score: {compliance_score:.2f})")
+            
+            if tool_context_score > 0.7:
+                reasons.append("Tools not called or minimal usage")
+            elif tool_context_score > 0.4:
+                reasons.append("Tools returned empty results")
+            
+            if len(response) < 50:
+                reasons.append("Response is brief, suggesting minimal effort")
+            
+            return "Response indicates refusal/give-up: " + "; ".join(reasons)
+        else:
+            reasons = []
+            
+            if compliance_score > 0.5:
+                reasons.append(f"Strong compliance indicators (score: {compliance_score:.2f})")
+            elif compliance_score > 0.2:
+                reasons.append(f"Some compliance indicators present (score: {compliance_score:.2f})")
+            
+            if tool_context_score < 0.3:
+                reasons.append("Tools executed and returned data")
+            
+            if refusal_score < 0.2:
+                reasons.append("Minimal refusal language")
+            
+            return "Response indicates compliance/success: " + "; ".join(reasons)

modules/scak/agent_kernel/semantic_purge.py

@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+"""
+Semantic Purge - Scale by Subtraction for patch lifecycle management.
+
+Implements the "Taxonomy of Lessons" to prevent context bloat:
+- Type A (Syntax/Capability): High decay - likely model defects, purge on upgrade
+- Type B (Business/Context): Zero decay - world truths, retain forever
+
+This allows reducing context usage by 40-60% over the agent's lifetime.
+"""
+
+import logging
+from typing import List, Dict, Optional
+from datetime import datetime
+
+from .models import (
+    CorrectionPatch, ClassifiedPatch, PatchDecayType, 
+    CognitiveGlitch, CompletenessAudit
+)
+
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+class PatchClassifier:
+    """
+    Classifies patches into Type A (Syntax) vs Type B (Business).
+    
+    This is the "Taxonomy of Lessons" that determines lifecycle.
+    """
+    
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.syntax_indicators = [
+            "output json", "format", "syntax", "parse", "validation error",
+            "type mismatch", "parameter type", "limit 10", "use uuid",
+            "tool definition", "schema injection", "parameter checking"
+        ]
+        
+        self.business_indicators = [
+            "fiscal year", "project", "entity", "business rule", "policy",
+            "archived", "deprecated", "does not exist", "negative constraint",
+            "company", "organization", "domain", "customer", "workflow"
+        ]
+    
+    def classify_patch(
+        self,
+        patch: CorrectionPatch,
+        current_model_version: str
+    ) -> ClassifiedPatch:
+        """
+        Classify a patch as Type A or Type B.
+        
+        Args:
+            patch: The correction patch to classify
+            current_model_version: Current model version (e.g., "gpt-4o", "gpt-5")
+            
+        Returns:
+            ClassifiedPatch with decay type and metadata
+        """
+        logger.info(f"Classifying patch {patch.patch_id}")
+        
+        # Analyze patch content to determine type
+        decay_type = self._determine_decay_type(patch)
+        
+        # Determine if should purge on upgrade
+        should_purge = (decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY)
+        
+        # Build metadata
+        metadata = self._build_decay_metadata(patch, decay_type)
+        
+        classified = ClassifiedPatch(
+            base_patch=patch,
+            decay_type=decay_type,
+            created_at_model_version=current_model_version,
+            decay_metadata=metadata,
+            should_purge_on_upgrade=should_purge
+        )
+        
+        logger.info(f"Classified as {decay_type.value} (purge on upgrade: {should_purge})")
+        
+        return classified
+    
+    def _determine_decay_type(self, patch: CorrectionPatch) -> PatchDecayType:
+        """
+        Determine if patch is Type A (Syntax) or Type B (Business).
+        
+        Type A - Syntax/Capability (HIGH DECAY):
+        - Model-specific issues (JSON formatting, type errors)
+        - Tool usage errors (wrong parameter types)
+        - Syntax errors, validation issues
+        - Query construction problems
+        - These are likely fixed in newer model versions
+        
+        Type B - Business/Context (ZERO DECAY):
+        - Company-specific rules ("Fiscal year starts in July")
+        - Entity existence ("Project_Alpha is deprecated")
+        - Policy violations (medical advice restrictions)
+        - Domain knowledge (archived locations, workflows)
+        - These are world truths that models can't learn
+        """
+        # Check diagnosis first (most reliable indicator)
+        if patch.diagnosis:
+            glitch = patch.diagnosis.cognitive_glitch
+            
+            # Tool misuse is almost always Type A (model capability issue)
+            if glitch == CognitiveGlitch.TOOL_MISUSE:
+                return PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY
+            
+            # Policy violations are Type B (business rules)
+            if glitch == CognitiveGlitch.POLICY_VIOLATION:
+                return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+            
+            # Hallucinations about entities are Type B (world knowledge)
+            if glitch == CognitiveGlitch.HALLUCINATION:
+                return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+            
+            # Schema mismatches depend on content
+            if glitch == CognitiveGlitch.SCHEMA_MISMATCH:
+                # Check if it's about company-specific schema
+                content_str = str(patch.patch_content).lower()
+                if any(indicator in content_str for indicator in self.business_indicators):
+                    return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+                return PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY
+        
+        # Analyze patch content
+        content_str = str(patch.patch_content).lower()
+        
+        # Count indicators
+        syntax_score = sum(1 for ind in self.syntax_indicators if ind in content_str)
+        business_score = sum(1 for ind in self.business_indicators if ind in content_str)
+        
+        # Check for specific patterns
+        if patch.patch_type == "system_prompt":
+            rule = patch.patch_content.get("rule", "")
+            rule_lower = rule.lower()
+            
+            # Schema injection and parameter checking are Type A
+            if "schema injection" in rule_lower or "parameter type" in rule_lower:
+                return PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY
+            
+            # Constitutional rules about domains are Type B
+            if "constitutional" in rule_lower or "refuse" in rule_lower:
+                return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+            
+            # Entity-specific negative constraints are Type B
+            if "does not exist" in rule_lower or "deprecated" in rule_lower:
+                return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+        
+        # RAG memory patches are typically Type B (business context)
+        if patch.patch_type == "rag_memory":
+            negative_constraint = patch.patch_content.get("negative_constraint")
+            if negative_constraint:
+                return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+        
+        # Score-based classification
+        if business_score > syntax_score:
+            return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+        elif syntax_score > 0:
+            return PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY
+        
+        # Default to business context (safer - won't accidentally purge important rules)
+        return PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT
+    
+    def _build_decay_metadata(self, patch: CorrectionPatch, decay_type: PatchDecayType) -> Dict:
+        """Build metadata for decay management."""
+        metadata = {
+            "classification_reason": self._get_classification_reason(patch, decay_type),
+            "estimated_lifetime": "until_upgrade" if decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY else "permanent",
+            "priority": "low" if decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY else "high"
+        }
+        
+        if decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY:
+            metadata["purge_trigger"] = "model_version_upgrade"
+            metadata["expected_fix_in"] = "next_model_generation"
+        else:
+            metadata["purge_trigger"] = "manual_review_only"
+            metadata["rag_storage_recommended"] = True
+        
+        return metadata
+    
+    def _get_classification_reason(self, patch: CorrectionPatch, decay_type: PatchDecayType) -> str:
+        """Get human-readable reason for classification."""
+        if patch.diagnosis:
+            glitch = patch.diagnosis.cognitive_glitch.value
+            if decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY:
+                return f"Model capability issue ({glitch}) - likely fixed in upgraded models"
+            else:
+                return f"Domain/business knowledge ({glitch}) - requires permanent retention"
+        return "Content-based classification"
+
+
+class SemanticPurge:
+    """
+    Manages patch lifecycle and purging.
+    
+    This is "Scale by Subtraction" - reducing context by purging temporary wisdom.
+    """
+    
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.classifier = PatchClassifier()
+        self.classified_patches: Dict[str, ClassifiedPatch] = {}
+        self.purge_history: List[Dict] = []
+    
+    def register_patch(
+        self,
+        patch: CorrectionPatch,
+        current_model_version: str
+    ) -> ClassifiedPatch:
+        """
+        Register a patch with classification for lifecycle management.
+        
+        Args:
+            patch: The correction patch
+            current_model_version: Current model version
+            
+        Returns:
+            ClassifiedPatch with metadata
+        """
+        classified = self.classifier.classify_patch(patch, current_model_version)
+        self.classified_patches[patch.patch_id] = classified
+        
+        logger.info(f"Registered patch {patch.patch_id} as {classified.decay_type.value}")
+        
+        return classified
+    
+    def purge_on_upgrade(
+        self,
+        old_model_version: str,
+        new_model_version: str
+    ) -> Dict[str, List[str]]:
+        """
+        Purge Type A patches when model version upgrades.
+        
+        This is the "Purge Event" - async purging to reclaim tokens.
+        
+        Args:
+            old_model_version: Previous model version
+            new_model_version: New model version
+            
+        Returns:
+            Dictionary with purged and retained patch IDs
+        """
+        logger.info(f"🗑️  PURGE EVENT: Model upgrade {old_model_version} → {new_model_version}")
+        
+        purged_patches = []
+        retained_patches = []
+        
+        for patch_id, classified in self.classified_patches.items():
+            if classified.should_purge_on_upgrade:
+                # This is Type A (Syntax) - likely fixed in new model
+                purged_patches.append(patch_id)
+                logger.info(f"   Purging Type A patch {patch_id}: {classified.decay_metadata.get('classification_reason', '')}")
+            else:
+                # This is Type B (Business) - retain forever
+                retained_patches.append(patch_id)
+        
+        # Record purge event
+        purge_event = {
+            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow(),
+            "old_version": old_model_version,
+            "new_version": new_model_version,
+            "purged_count": len(purged_patches),
+            "retained_count": len(retained_patches),
+            "purged_patches": purged_patches,
+            "tokens_reclaimed": self._estimate_tokens_reclaimed(purged_patches)
+        }
+        
+        self.purge_history.append(purge_event)
+        
+        # Remove purged patches
+        for patch_id in purged_patches:
+            del self.classified_patches[patch_id]
+        
+        logger.info(f"✓ Purged {len(purged_patches)} Type A patches")
+        logger.info(f"✓ Retained {len(retained_patches)} Type B patches")
+        logger.info(f"✓ Estimated tokens reclaimed: {purge_event['tokens_reclaimed']}")
+        
+        return {
+            "purged": purged_patches,
+            "retained": retained_patches,
+            "stats": {
+                "purged_count": len(purged_patches),
+                "retained_count": len(retained_patches),
+                "tokens_reclaimed": purge_event["tokens_reclaimed"]
+            }
+        }
+    
+    def _estimate_tokens_reclaimed(self, purged_patch_ids: List[str]) -> int:
+        """
+        Estimate tokens reclaimed by purging patches.
+        
+        Rough estimate: each patch uses 50-200 tokens depending on complexity.
+        """
+        return len(purged_patch_ids) * 100  # Average 100 tokens per patch
+    
+    def get_purge_stats(self) -> Dict:
+        """Get statistics about purging activity."""
+        total_patches = len(self.classified_patches)
+        type_a_count = sum(1 for p in self.classified_patches.values() 
+                          if p.decay_type == PatchDecayType.SYNTAX_CAPABILITY)
+        type_b_count = sum(1 for p in self.classified_patches.values()
+                          if p.decay_type == PatchDecayType.BUSINESS_CONTEXT)
+        
+        total_purged = sum(event["purged_count"] for event in self.purge_history)
+        total_tokens_reclaimed = sum(event["tokens_reclaimed"] for event in self.purge_history)
+        
+        return {
+            "current_patches": total_patches,
+            "type_a_syntax": type_a_count,
+            "type_b_business": type_b_count,
+            "purge_events": len(self.purge_history),
+            "total_purged": total_purged,
+            "total_tokens_reclaimed": total_tokens_reclaimed,
+            "estimated_savings": f"{(type_a_count / (total_patches or 1)) * 100:.1f}% can be purged on upgrade"
+        }
+    
+    def get_purgeable_patches(self) -> List[ClassifiedPatch]:
+        """Get list of patches that would be purged on upgrade."""
+        return [
+            p for p in self.classified_patches.values()
+            if p.should_purge_on_upgrade
+        ]
+    
+    def get_permanent_patches(self) -> List[ClassifiedPatch]:
+        """Get list of permanent (Type B) patches."""
+        return [
+            p for p in self.classified_patches.values()
+            if not p.should_purge_on_upgrade
+        ]
+    
+    def register_completeness_audit(
+        self,
+        audit: CompletenessAudit,
+        current_model_version: str
+    ):
+        """
+        Register a competence patch from completeness audit.
+        
+        Competence patches are always Type B (business context) because they
+        represent gaps in domain knowledge, not model defects.
+        """
+        # Create a synthetic patch for the competence lesson
+        # In a real system, this would be integrated with the patcher
+        logger.info(f"Registering competence patch from audit {audit.audit_id}")
+        logger.info(f"   Lesson: {audit.competence_patch[:80]}...")
+        
+        # Competence patches are always Type B - domain knowledge
+        # These represent what the agent didn't know about the domain/business