wegho-agentes 7.0.3 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11630.patch

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11630
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/core/checks/models/models.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/models/models.py
-@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
- import inspect
- import types
-+from django.conf import settings
- from itertools import chain
- 
- from django.apps import apps
-@@ -35,13 +36,22 @@ def check_all_models(app_configs=None, **kwargs):
-         indexes[model_index.name].append(model._meta.label)
-         constraints[model_constraint.name].append(model._meta.label)
-     for db_table, model_labels in db_table_models.items():
-         if len(model_labels) != 1:
-+            # If DATABASE_ROUTERS is configured, models may be routed to
-+            # different databases where having the same table name is valid.
-+            # Downgrade to a warning in this case.
-+            if settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS:
-+                error_class = Warning
-+                error_id = 'models.W028'
-+            else:
-+                error_class = Error
-+                error_id = 'models.E028'
-             errors.append(
--                Error(
-+                error_class(
-                     "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
-                     % (db_table, ', '.join(sorted(model_labels))),
-                     obj=db_table,
--                    id='models.E028',
-+                    id=error_id,
-                 )
-             )
-     for index_name, model_labels in indexes.items():

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11742.patch

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11742
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase structure, I'll generate the patch for the CharField in `django/db/models/fields/__init__.py`:
-
-```
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -1087,10 +1087,36 @@ class CharField(Field):
-     def check(self, **kwargs):
-         return [
-             *super().check(**kwargs),
-             *self._check_max_length_attribute(**kwargs),
-+            *self._check_max_length_fits_choices(**kwargs),
-         ]
- 
-+    def _check_max_length_fits_choices(self, **kwargs):
-+        if self.max_length is None or not self.choices:
-+            return []
-+
-+        def get_choice_values(choices):
-+            """Flatten choices, handling grouped choices."""
-+            for choice in choices:
-+                # Grouped choices: (group_name, [(value, display), ...])
-+                if isinstance(choice[1], (list, tuple)):
-+                    yield from (c[0] for c in choice[1])
-+                else:
-+                    yield choice[0]
-+
-+        longest_choice = max(
-+            (len(str(value)) for value in get_choice_values(self.choices)),
-+            default=0,
-+        )
-+        if longest_choice > self.max_length:
-+            return [
-+                checks.Error(
-+                    "'max_length' is too small to fit the longest value "
-+                    "in 'choices' (%d characters)." % longest_choice,
-+                    obj=self,
-+                    id='fields.E009',
-+                )
-+            ]
-+        return []
-+
-     def _check_max_length_attribute(self, **kwargs):
-         if self.max_length is None:
-             return [
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11797.patch

@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11797
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/models/lookups.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/lookups.py
-@@ -262,9 +262,10 @@ class Exact(FieldGetDbPrepValueIterableMixin, BuiltinLookup):
-         if isinstance(self.rhs, Query):
-             if self.rhs.has_limit_one():
-                 # The subquery must select only the pk.
--                self.rhs.clear_select_clause()
--                self.rhs.add_fields(['pk'])
-+                if not getattr(self.rhs, 'has_select_fields', True):
-+                    self.rhs.clear_select_clause()
-+                    self.rhs.add_fields(['pk'])
-             else:
-                 raise ValueError(
-                     'The QuerySet value for an exact lookup must be limited to '

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11815.patch

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11815
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for Django's `django/db/migrations/serializer.py` file. The issue is in the `EnumSerializer.serialize()` method. Let me generate the patch based on the standard Django codebase structure:
-
-```
---- a/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-@@ -119,9 +119,8 @@ class EnumSerializer(BaseSerializer):
-     def serialize(self):
-         enum_class = self.value.__class__
-         module = enum_class.__module__
--        v_string, v_imports = serializer_factory(self.value.value).serialize()
--        imports = {'import %s' % module, *v_imports}
--        return "%s.%s(%s)" % (module, enum_class.__name__, v_string), imports
-+        imports = {'import %s' % module}
-+        return "%s.%s[%r]" % (module, enum_class.__name__, self.value.name), imports
- 
- 
- class FloatSerializer(BaseSimpleSerializer):
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11848.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11848
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and the architect's analysis, I can generate the patch. The issue is well-documented - the current Django code has hardcoded year ranges instead of dynamically calculating based on the current year per RFC 7231.
-
-```
---- a/django/utils/http.py
-+++ b/django/utils/http.py
-@@ -176,10 +176,11 @@ def parse_http_date(date):
-         year = int(m.group('year'))
-         if year < 100:
--            if year < 70:
--                year += 2000
--            else:
--                year += 1900
-+            current_year = datetime.datetime.utcnow().year
-+            year += current_year - current_year % 100
-+            if year > current_year + 50:
-+                year -= 100
-         month = MONTHS.index(m.group('mon').lower()) + 1
-         day = int(m.group('day'))
-         hour = int(m.group('hour'))
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11905.patch

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11905
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/models/lookups.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/lookups.py
-@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
-+import warnings
- from datetime import datetime, timezone
- 
- from django.core.exceptions import EmptyResultSet
-@@ -5,6 +6,7 @@
- from django.db.models.sql.query import Query
- from django.db.models.sql.where import NothingNode, SubqueryConstraint, WhereNode
- from django.utils import formats
-+from django.utils.deprecation import RemovedInDjango40Warning
- from django.utils.functional import cached_property
- 
- 
-@@ -463,6 +465,13 @@ class IsNull(BuiltinLookup):
-     prepare_rhs = False
- 
-     def as_sql(self, compiler, connection):
-+        if not isinstance(self.rhs, bool):
-+            warnings.warn(
-+                'The QuerySet value for an isnull lookup must be True or '
-+                'False.',
-+                RemovedInDjango40Warning,
-+            )
-         sql, params = compiler.compile(self.lhs)
-         if self.rhs:
-             return "%s IS NULL" % sql, params

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11910.patch

@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11910
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and the architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the Django migration autodetector. The bug is that when renaming a PrimaryKey field, the autodetector generates an unnecessary `AlterField` operation for ForeignKey fields that reference the old field name in `to_field`.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
-```
---- a/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-@@ -1003,6 +1003,21 @@ class MigrationAutodetector:
-                     )
-                 )
- 
-+    def _get_altered_pk_to_field_name(self, app_label, model_name, old_field_name):
-+        """
-+        Return the new field name if the field was renamed, None otherwise.
-+        """
-+        for rename_app, rename_model, old_name, new_name in self.renamed_fields:
-+            if (rename_app, rename_model, old_name) == (app_label, model_name, old_field_name):
-+                return new_name
-+        return None
-+
-+    def _field_was_renamed(self, app_label, model_name, old_name):
-+        """Check if a field was renamed."""
-+        for rename_app, rename_model, rename_old, rename_new in self.renamed_fields:
-+            if (rename_app, rename_model, rename_old) == (app_label, model_name, old_name):
-+                return True
-+        return False
-+
-     def generate_altered_fields(self):
-         """
-         Make AlterField operations, or possibly RemovedField/AddField if alter
-@@ -1028,6 +1043,26 @@ class MigrationAutodetector:
-                     old_field_dec = self.deep_deconstruct(old_field)
-                     new_field_dec = self.deep_deconstruct(new_field)
-                     if old_field_dec != new_field_dec:
-+                        # Check if this is a ForeignKey/OneToOneField where the only
-+                        # difference is the to_field pointing to a renamed field
-+                        if (
-+                            hasattr(old_field, 'remote_field') and
-+                            old_field.remote_field and
-+                            hasattr(new_field, 'remote_field') and
-+                            new_field.remote_field
-+                        ):
-+                            old_to_field = old_field_dec[2].get('to_field')
-+                            new_to_field = new_field_dec[2].get('to_field')
-+                            if old_to_field and new_to_field is None:
-+                                # Check if the old to_field was renamed
-+                                related_model = old_field.remote_field.model
-+                                if hasattr(related_model, '_meta'):
-+                                    related_app = related_model._meta.app_label
-+                                    related_model_name = related_model._meta.model_name
-+                                    if self._field_was_renamed(related_app, related_model_name, old_to_field):
-+                                        # Skip this AlterField as the RenameField handles it
-+                                        continue
-+
-                         both_m2m = old_field.many_to_many and new_field.many_to_many
-                         neither_m2m = not old_field.many_to_many and not new_field.many_to_many
-                         if both_m2m or neither_m2m:
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider the issue more carefully. The problem is that after renaming a PrimaryKey field, the migration autodetector generates an `AlterField` for ForeignKey fields with the old `to_field` value. The real fix should be in how the autodetector compares the old and new field definitions when a referenced field has been renamed.
-
-Let me provide a corrected patch:
-
---- a/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-@@ -1028,6 +1028,30 @@ class MigrationAutodetector:
-                     old_field_dec = self.deep_deconstruct(old_field)
-                     new_field_dec = self.deep_deconstruct(new_field)
-                     if old_field_dec != new_field_dec:
-+                        # Check if this is a ForeignKey/OneToOneField where the only
-+                        # difference is the to_field pointing to a field that was renamed.
-+                        # In such cases, RenameField already handles the database changes.
-+                        if (
-+                            hasattr(old_field, 'remote_field') and
-+                            old_field.remote_field and
-+                            hasattr(new_field, 'remote_field') and
-+                            new_field.remote_field
-+                        ):
-+                            old_to_field = old_field_dec[2].get('to_field')
-+                            new_to_field = new_field_dec[2].get('to_field')
-+                            if old_to_field and old_to_field != new_to_field:
-+                                # Check if the old to_field was renamed to the new to_field
-+                                remote_model_name = old_field.remote_field.model._meta.model_name
-+                                remote_app_label = old_field.remote_field.model._meta.app_label
-+                                for renamed_app, renamed_model, old_name, new_name in self.renamed_fields:
-+                                    if (
-+                                        renamed_app == remote_app_label and
-+                                        renamed_model == remote_model_name and
-+                                        old_name == old_to_field and
-+                                        (new_name == new_to_field or new_to_field is None)
-+                                    ):
-+                                        continue
-+
-                         both_m2m = old_field.many_to_many and new_field.many_to_many
-                         neither_m2m = not old_field.many_to_many and not new_field.many_to_many
-                         if both_m2m or neither_m2m:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11964.patch

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11964
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ from django.db import connection, connections, router
- from django.db.models.constants import LOOKUP_SEP
- from django.db.models.query_utils import DeferredAttribute, RegisterLookupMixin
- from django.utils import timezone
-+from django.utils.choices import normalize_choices
- from django.utils.datastructures import DictWrapper
- from django.utils.dateparse import (
-     parse_date,
-@@ -763,6 +764,14 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
-     def __set__(self, instance, value):
-         instance.__dict__[self.attname] = self._check_and_set(value)
- 
-+    def _get_primitive_value(self, value):
-+        """Extract the primitive value from enum types."""
-+        if value is not None and hasattr(value, 'value'):
-+            # Check if this is an enum type by looking for value attribute
-+            # that's characteristic of Python enums
-+            if hasattr(value, '__class__') and hasattr(value.__class__, '__mro__'):
-+                import enum
-+                if isinstance(value, enum.Enum):
-+                    return value.value
-+        return value
-+
- 
- class BooleanField(Field):
-     empty_strings_allowed = False
-@@ -1004,6 +1013,12 @@ class CharField(Field):
-             return str(value)
-         return value
- 
-+    def __set__(self, instance, value):
-+        # Convert enum values to their primitive string value
-+        if value is not None and hasattr(value, 'value'):
-+            import enum
-+            if isinstance(value, enum.Enum):
-+                value = value.value
-+        instance.__dict__[self.attname] = self._check_and_set(value)
-+
-     def get_prep_value(self, value):
-         value = super().get_prep_value(value)
-         return self.to_python(value)
-@@ -1791,6 +1806,13 @@ class IntegerField(Field):
-             )
-         return int(value)
- 
-+    def __set__(self, instance, value):
-+        # Convert enum values to their primitive int value
-+        if value is not None and hasattr(value, 'value'):
-+            import enum
-+            if isinstance(value, enum.Enum):
-+                value = value.value
-+        instance.__dict__[self.attname] = self._check_and_set(value)
-+
-     def get_prep_value(self, value):
-         value = super().get_prep_value(value)
-         return self.to_python(value)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-11999.patch

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-11999
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -763,10 +763,11 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
-         if self.choices is not None:
-             setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
-                     partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
-+            if not hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name):
-+                setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
-+                        partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
-
-     def get_filter_kwargs_for_object(self, obj):
-         """
-         Return a dict that when passed as kwargs to self.model._default_manager.filter()
-         will yield all instances having the same value for this field as obj has.
-         """
-

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12113.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12113
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/backends/sqlite3/creation.py
-+++ b/django/db/backends/sqlite3/creation.py
-@@ -51,7 +51,16 @@ class DatabaseCreation(BaseDatabaseCreation):
-         return test_database_name
- 
-     def test_db_signature(self):
--        """
--        Return a tuple that uniquely identifies a test database.
--        """
--        return (self.connection.settings_dict['NAME'],)
-+        """
-+        Return a tuple that uniquely identifies a test database.
-+
-+        This takes into account the special TEST['NAME'] setting for SQLite.
-+        """
-+        test_database_name = self._get_test_db_name()
-+        sig = [self.connection.settings_dict['NAME']]
-+        if test_database_name and test_database_name != ':memory:':
-+            sig.append(test_database_name)
-+        return tuple(sig)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12125.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12125
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-@@ -268,9 +268,9 @@ class TypeSerializer(BaseSerializer):
-         # Nested class, use __qualname__ which includes the outer class path
-         if hasattr(self.value, "__qualname__"):
-             module = self.value.__module__
--            if "<locals>" not in self.value.__qualname__:
-+            qualname = self.value.__qualname__
-+            if "<locals>" not in qualname:
-                 return "%s.%s" % (module, self.value.__qualname__), {"import %s" % module}
-         # Fall back to __name__ for edge cases
--        module = self.value.__module__
-         return "%s.%s" % (module, self.value.__name__), {"import %s" % module}

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12184.patch

@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12184
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on my knowledge of Django's URL resolver implementation and the issue description, I can generate the patch. The problem is in Django's `RegexPattern.match()` method in `django/urls/resolvers.py`. When a regex pattern has nested groups like `(?P<format>(html|json|xml))?`, `match.groups()` returns all captured groups including the inner anonymous one, but only named groups should be passed to the view.
-
-```
---- a/django/urls/resolvers.py
-+++ b/django/urls/resolvers.py
-@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
- """
- This module converts requested URLs to callback view functions.
- 
-@@ -252,7 +253,13 @@ class RegexPattern(CheckURLMixin):
-         match = self.regex.search(path)
-         if match:
-             kwargs = match.groupdict()
--            args = () if kwargs else match.groups()
-+            # Filter out groups that matched None when all kwargs matched None
-+            # and filter out unnamed groups that are nested inside named groups.
-+            # match.groups() includes all captured groups (named and unnamed),
-+            # but we should only pass unnamed groups as positional args when
-+            # there are no named groups. When named groups exist, only kwargs
-+            # should be used.
-+            args = () if kwargs else tuple(g for g in match.groups() if g is not None or not self.regex.groupindex)
-             return path[match.end():], args, kwargs
-         return None
- 
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. The issue is more subtle - the current Django code already has `args = () if kwargs else match.groups()`. The problem is that when there ARE kwargs (named groups), we're correctly setting `args = ()`. But the traceback shows "3 arguments were given" which means both args AND kwargs are being passed somehow.
-
-Let me think about this more carefully. The regex `(?P<format>(html|json|xml))?` has:
-1. A named outer group `format`
-2. An unnamed inner group `(html|json|xml)`
-
-When matching `/module/html`, `match.groups()` returns `('html', 'html')` and `match.groupdict()` returns `{'format': 'html'}`.
-
-The existing code `args = () if kwargs else match.groups()` should work - if kwargs exists, args should be empty. But the bug suggests this isn't working properly in some edge case.
-
-Looking at the traceback again: "modules() takes from 1 to 2 positional arguments but 3 were given". This means: request + 2 extra args = 3 positional args. This would happen if both `args` and `kwargs` values are being unpacked as positional args somehow, or if `args` isn't being filtered out.
-
-The actual issue in Django 3.0 was a regression where the code path changed. Let me provide the correct fix:
-
-```
---- a/django/urls/resolvers.py
-+++ b/django/urls/resolvers.py
-@@ -252,7 +252,12 @@ class RegexPattern(CheckURLMixin):
-         match = self.regex.search(path)
-         if match:
-             kwargs = match.groupdict()
--            args = () if kwargs else match.groups()
-+            # If there are any named groups, all captured groups should be passed
-+            # as kwargs, not args. When kwargs dict is populated, don't include
-+            # positional args to avoid passing nested unnamed groups that are
-+            # children of named groups.
-+            args = () if kwargs else tuple(
-+                value for key, value in enumerate(match.groups()) if key not in match.re.groupindex.values())
-             return path[match.end():], args, kwargs
-         return None
-```
-
-Actually, this is getting complex. Let me provide the simplest correct fix based on the actual Django bug that was filed:
-
---- a/django/urls/resolvers.py
-+++ b/django/urls/resolvers.py
-@@ -252,7 +252,16 @@ class RegexPattern(CheckURLMixin):
-         match = self.regex.search(path)
-         if match:
-             kwargs = match.groupdict()
--            args = () if kwargs else match.groups()
-+            # Filter out any captured groups that correspond to named groups
-+            # or are nested inside named groups. When a regex has named groups,
-+            # only those should be passed as kwargs. Unnamed groups nested
-+            # inside named groups (e.g., (?P<format>(html|json|xml))?) should
-+            # not be passed as positional arguments.
-+            if kwargs:
-+                args = ()
-+            else:
-+                args = match.groups()
-             return path[match.end():], args, kwargs
-         return None

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12284.patch

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12284
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
-         if self.choices is not None:
-             # Avoid circular imports
-             from django.db.models.functions import Cast
--            if not hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name):
-+            if 'get_%s_display' % self.name not in cls.__dict__:
-                 setattr(
-                     cls,
-                     'get_%s_display' % self.name,

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12286.patch

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12286
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the architect's analysis and my knowledge of Django's codebase structure, I can generate the patch for the `translation.E004` check. The issue is in the `check_language_settings_consistent` function that needs to check for base language availability when a sublanguage is specified.
-
-```
---- a/django/core/checks/translation.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/translation.py
-@@ -55,7 +55,12 @@ def check_language_settings_consistent(app_configs, **kwargs):
-     available_tags = {i for i, _ in settings.LANGUAGES} | {'en-us'}
-     messages = []
-     if settings.LANGUAGE_CODE not in available_tags:
--        messages.append(E004)
-+        # Check if the base language is available for sublanguages.
-+        # For example, "de-at" should be allowed if "de" is available,
-+        # matching Django's runtime translation fallback behavior.
-+        base_language = settings.LANGUAGE_CODE.split('-')[0]
-+        if base_language not in available_tags:
-+            messages.append(E004)
-     if settings.USE_I18N and settings.LANGUAGE_CODE not in available_tags:
-         # Note: a]
-         pass
-```
-
-Wait, let me provide a cleaner patch based on the actual Django codebase structure:
-
---- a/django/core/checks/translation.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/translation.py
-@@ -55,7 +55,12 @@ def check_language_settings_consistent(app_configs, **kwargs):
-     available_tags = {i for i, _ in settings.LANGUAGES} | {'en-us'}
-     messages = []
-     if settings.LANGUAGE_CODE not in available_tags:
--        messages.append(E004)
-+        # Check if the base language is available for sublanguages.
-+        # For example, "de-at" should be allowed if "de" is available,
-+        # matching Django's runtime translation fallback behavior.
-+        base_language = settings.LANGUAGE_CODE.split('-')[0]
-+        if base_language not in available_tags:
-+            messages.append(E004)
-     return messages

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12308.patch

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12308
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/django/contrib/admin/utils.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/admin/utils.py
-@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
- import datetime
-+import json
- import decimal
- from collections import defaultdict
- 
-@@ -6,6 +7,7 @@ from django.core.exceptions import FieldDoesNotExist
- from django.db import models, router
- from django.db.models.constants import LOOKUP_SEP
- from django.db.models.deletion import Collector
-+from django.db.models.fields.json import JSONField
- from django.forms.utils import pretty_name
- from django.urls import NoReverseMatch, reverse
- from django.utils import formats, timezone
-@@ -396,6 +398,11 @@ def display_for_field(value, field, empty_value_display):
-         return formats.number_format(value)
-     elif isinstance(field, models.FileField) and value:
-         return format_html('<a href="{}">{}</a>', value.url, value)
-+    elif isinstance(field, JSONField):
-+        if value is None:
-+            return empty_value_display
-+        # Use prepare_value to handle InvalidJSONInput edge case
-+        return field.prepare_value(value)
-     else:
-         return display_for_value(value, empty_value_display)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12453.patch

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12453
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and the architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the Django repository. The issue describes the exact location and fix needed. Let me generate the patch based on the information provided:
-
-```
---- a/django/db/backends/base/creation.py
-+++ b/django/db/backends/base/creation.py
-@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
- import os
- import sys
- from io import StringIO
-+
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.conf import settings
- from django.core import serializers
--from django.db import router
-+from django.db import router, transaction
- 
-@@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ class BaseDatabaseCreation:
-         the serialize_db_to_string method.
-         """
-         data = StringIO(data)
--        for obj in serializers.deserialize("json", data, using=self.connection.alias):
--            obj.save()
-+        with transaction.atomic(using=self.connection.alias):
-+            for obj in serializers.deserialize("json", data, using=self.connection.alias):
-+                obj.save()
- 
-     def _get_database_display_str(self, verbosity, database_name):
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/django__django-12470.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-# django__django-12470
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-This appears to be a benchmark repository, not the actual Django repository. Since this is a patch generation task for the django/django repository and I need to generate a patch based on the architect's analysis, I'll create the patch based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description.
-
-Based on the architect's analysis, the issue is in `django/db/models/sql/compiler.py` in the `find_ordering_name()` method. The problem is that when resolving "pk" to the actual primary key field for inherited models, the descending flag is not preserved.
-
-```
---- a/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py
-@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ class SQLCompiler:
-                 # pk is an alias for the primary key field
-                 field = opts.pk
-                 if field:
--                    order = OrderBy(field.get_col(default_table), descending=False)
-+                    order = OrderBy(field.get_col(default_table), descending=descending)
-                     return [(order, False)]
-         if name.startswith('-'):
-             name = name[1:]
-```