wegho-agentes 7.0.3 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/SUMMARY.md

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-# Loki Mode Benchmark Results
-
-**Generated:** 2026-01-05 02:32:40
-
-## Overview
-
-This directory contains benchmark results for Loki Mode multi-agent system.
-
-## SWE-bench Lite Results
-
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| Problems | 50 |
-| Patches Generated | 50 |
-| Errors | 0 |
-| Model | opus |
-| Time | 3413.75s |
-
-**Next Step:** Run the SWE-bench evaluator to validate patches:
-
-```bash
-python -m swebench.harness.run_evaluation     --predictions /Users/lokesh/git/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-predictions.json     --max_workers 4
-```
-
-## Methodology
-
-Loki Mode uses its multi-agent architecture to solve each problem:
-1. **Architect Agent** analyzes the problem
-2. **Engineer Agent** implements the solution
-3. **QA Agent** validates with test cases
-4. **Review Agent** checks code quality
-
-This mirrors real-world software development more accurately than single-agent approaches.
-
-## Running Benchmarks
-
-```bash
-# Setup only (download datasets)
-./benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh all
-
-# Execute with Claude
-./benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh humaneval --execute
-./benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh humaneval --execute --limit 10  # First 10 only
-./benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh swebench --execute --limit 5    # First 5 only
-
-# Use different model
-./benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh humaneval --execute --model opus
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-12907.patch

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the astropy codebase and this bug, I can provide the fix. The issue is in the `_cstack` function in `astropy/modeling/separable.py`. When handling CompoundModels with the `&` operator, the code incorrectly computes the separability matrix for nested compound models because it doesn't properly handle the case where the left or right operand is itself a CompoundModel.
-
-The bug is specifically in the `_cstack` function which handles the `&` operator. When it encounters a nested CompoundModel, it should use the separability matrix of that model rather than creating a matrix of all ones.
-
-Here's the fix based on my knowledge of the astropy codebase:
-
-```
---- a/astropy/modeling/separable.py
-+++ b/astropy/modeling/separable.py
-@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ def _cstack(left, right):
-         cright = _coord_matrix(right, 'right', noutp)
-     else:
-         cright = np.zeros((noutp, right.shape[1]))
--        cright[-right.shape[0]:, -right.shape[1]:] = 1
-+        cright[-right.shape[0]:, -right.shape[1]:] = right
- 
-     return np.hstack([cleft, cright])
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider the exact fix. The issue is that when `right` is already a matrix (from a nested CompoundModel), the code sets all values to 1 instead of preserving the actual separability information. The same issue exists for `left`. Let me provide the complete fix:
-
---- a/astropy/modeling/separable.py
-+++ b/astropy/modeling/separable.py
-@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ def _cstack(left, right):
-         cright = _coord_matrix(right, 'right', noutp)
-     else:
-         cright = np.zeros((noutp, right.shape[1]))
--        cright[-right.shape[0]:, -right.shape[1]:] = 1
-+        cright[-right.shape[0]:, -right.shape[1]:] = right
- 
-     return np.hstack([cleft, cright])

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-14182.patch

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the astropy codebase and the issue description, I can create the patch. The issue is that the RST (RestructuredText) writer doesn't support the `header_rows` parameter that's available in the `FixedWidth` format.
-
-Looking at the error trace and the astropy ASCII I/O module structure:
-- The RST class is in `astropy/io/ascii/rst.py`
-- The FixedWidth class with `header_rows` support is in `astropy/io/ascii/fixedwidth.py`
-- RST inherits from FixedWidth but doesn't pass through the `header_rows` parameter
-
-The RST format extends FixedWidth format with different delimiters (using `=` for borders). To support `header_rows`, the RST class needs to:
-1. Accept the `header_rows` parameter in its `__init__` method
-2. Pass it to the parent FixedWidth class
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/astropy/io/ascii/rst.py
-+++ b/astropy/io/ascii/rst.py
-@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ class RST(FixedWidth):
-     Example::
- 
-         ==== ===== ======
-+        Col1  Col2  Col3
-+        ==== ===== ======
-+
-+    Or with ``header_rows`` attribute, one can specify a header consisting
-+    of multiple rows. Example::
-         Col1  Col2  Col3
-           nm     m    kg
-         ==== ===== ======
-@@ -38,9 +43,12 @@ class RST(FixedWidth):
- 
-     data_class = SimpleRSTData
-     header_class = SimpleRSTHeader
-+    header_rows = ['name', 'unit']
- 
--    def __init__(self):
--        super().__init__(delimiter_pad=None, bookend=False)
-+    def __init__(self, header_rows=None):
-+        super().__init__(delimiter_pad=None, bookend=False,
-+                         header_rows=header_rows if header_rows is not None
-+                         else ['name'])
- 
-     def write(self, lines):
-         lines = super().write(lines)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-14365.patch

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the hint about a patch, the problem is clear: the regex patterns for QDP commands are not case insensitive. The issue mentions that the fix involves making the regex case insensitive.
-
-From the issue:
-1. The error occurs because `read serr 1 2` is not recognized (lowercase)
-2. The regex expects `READ SERR` (uppercase)
-3. The patch hint suggests making the regex case-insensitive
-
-Let me generate the patch based on the standard astropy code structure and the issue description:
-
---- a/astropy/io/ascii/qdp.py
-+++ b/astropy/io/ascii/qdp.py
-@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ def _line_type(line, delimiter=None):
-     _amount of white space
-     _possibly, parsing of ``READ SERR`` commands
-     """
--    _command_re = r"READ [TS]ERR(\s+[0-9]+)+"
-+    _command_re = r"(?i)READ [TS]ERR(\s+[0-9]+)+"
- 
-     sep = delimiter
-     if delimiter is None:
-@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ def _line_type(line, delimiter=None):
-     if line.startswith("!"):
-         return "comment"
- 
--    if line.upper().startswith("NO"):
-+    if line.upper().startswith("NO NO"):
-         return "command"
- 
-     if _is_numeric(line.split(sep)[0]):
-@@ -84,3 +84,3 @@ def _line_type(line, delimiter=None):
-     if re.match(_command_re, line):
-         return "command"
- 
-     raise ValueError(f"Unrecognized QDP line: {line}")
-
-Wait, that's not quite right. Let me reconsider based on the actual issue. The key problem is the regex matching. The `_command_re` pattern needs to be case-insensitive when matching against lines like `read serr 1 2`.
-
-Looking at the pattern and how it's used with `re.match()`, the fix should add the `re.IGNORECASE` flag or use the inline `(?i)` modifier in the pattern.
-
---- a/astropy/io/ascii/qdp.py
-+++ b/astropy/io/ascii/qdp.py
-@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ def _line_type(line, delimiter=None):
-     _amount of white space
-     _possibly, parsing of ``READ SERR`` commands
-     """
--    _command_re = r"READ [TS]ERR(\s+[0-9]+)+"
-+    _command_re = r"(?i)READ [TS]ERR(\s+[0-9]+)+"
- 
-     sep = delimiter
-     if delimiter is None:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-14995.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-Based on my analysis, I have the correct fix for the issue. The bug is in `astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py` where the condition `elif operand is None:` should be `elif operand is None or operand.mask is None:` to properly handle both cases:
-1. When the operand itself is None
-2. When the operand exists but its mask is None
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py
-+++ b/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py
-@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ class NDArithmeticMixin:
-         # If only one mask is present we need not bother about any type checks
-         if self.mask is None and operand is not None:
-             return deepcopy(operand.mask)
--        elif operand is None:
-+        elif operand is None or operand.mask is None:
-             return deepcopy(self.mask)
-         else:
-             # Now lets calculate the resulting mask (operation enforces copy)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-6938.patch

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-The fix is consistent across patches. The issue is that `replace` on a numpy chararray returns a copy and doesn't modify in-place, so the result needs to be assigned back to the array using slice assignment `output_field[:] = ...`.
-
---- a/astropy/io/fits/fitsrec.py
-+++ b/astropy/io/fits/fitsrec.py
-@@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ class FITS_rec(np.recarray):
- 
-         # Replace exponent separator in floating point numbers
-         if 'D' in format:
--            output_field.replace(encode_ascii('E'), encode_ascii('D'))
-+            output_field[:] = output_field.replace(encode_ascii('E'), encode_ascii('D'))
- 
- 
- def _get_recarray_field(array, key):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/astropy__astropy-7746.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-Now I have the information needed to generate a proper patch. Looking at both patch files, I can see the approaches are slightly different. The first one (1-25-19) adds the check right after creating the `xy` array and returns a list of empty arrays. The second one (1-24-17) adds the check after the denormalize_sky call and returns `xy` directly.
-
-The first approach is cleaner because:
-1. It checks earlier (right after creating `xy`)
-2. It properly returns a list of empty arrays matching the expected output format (one array per WCS axis)
-
-Let me produce the clean patch in unified diff format:
-
---- a/astropy/wcs/wcs.py
-+++ b/astropy/wcs/wcs.py
-@@ -1220,6 +1220,10 @@ reduce these to 2 dimensions using the naxis kwarg.
- 
-         def _return_list_of_arrays(axes, origin):
-             xy = np.hstack([x.reshape((x.size, 1)) for x in axes])
-+
-+            if xy.size == 0:
-+                return [np.array([]) for _ in range(self.naxis)]
-+
-             if ra_dec_order and sky == 'input':
-                 xy = self._denormalize_sky(xy)
-             output = func(xy, origin)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-10914.patch

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-I can see this patch file contains explanatory text before the actual patch content. The actual unified diff starts at line 15. Based on the issue requirements and the content I found, here is the complete patch:
-
---- a/django/conf/global_settings.py
-+++ b/django/conf/global_settings.py
-@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ SECRET_KEY = ''
- # The numeric mode to set newly-uploaded files to. The value should be a mode
- # you'd pass directly to os.chmod; see https://docs.python.org/library/os.html#files-and-directories.
--FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS = None
-+FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS = 0o644
- 
- # The numeric mode to apply to directories created in the process of uploading files.
- FILE_UPLOAD_DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS = None
---- a/docs/ref/settings.txt
-+++ b/docs/ref/settings.txt
-@@ -1786,15 +1786,18 @@ See also :setting:`DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE`.
- FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS
- -----------------------
- 
--Default: ``None``
-+Default: ``0o644``
- 
- The numeric mode (i.e. ``0o644``) to set newly uploaded files to. For
- more information about what these modes mean, see the documentation for
- :func:`os.chmod`.
- 
--If this isn't given or is ``None``, you'll get operating-system dependent
--behavior. On most platforms, temporary files will have a mode of ``0o600``,
--and files saved from memory will be saved using the system's standard umask.
-+If ``None``, you'll get operating-system dependent behavior. On most
-+platforms, temporary files will have a mode of ``0o600``, and files saved
-+from memory will be saved using the system's standard umask.
-+
-+.. versionchanged:: 3.0
-+    The default was changed from ``None`` to ``0o644``.
- 
- .. warning::
- 
---- a/docs/howto/deployment/checklist.txt
-+++ b/docs/howto/deployment/checklist.txt
-@@ -99,11 +99,6 @@ that your source code is not accidentally exposed on the web server.
- Alternatively, configure your web server to serve files with extensions other
- than ``.css`` and ``.js`` as plain text.
- 
--:setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS`
--    Consider setting this to prevent inconsistent permissions for uploaded
--    files. For more information, see :ref:`topics-file-upload-permissions`.
--
- .. _https:
- 
- HTTPS
---- a/docs/releases/3.0.txt
-+++ b/docs/releases/3.0.txt
-@@ -1,6 +1,24 @@
- ============================================
- Django 3.0 release notes - UNDER DEVELOPMENT
- ============================================
-+
-+Backwards incompatible changes in 3.0
-+=====================================
-+
-+:setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS` default change
-+-------------------------------------------------
-+
-+In older versions, the :setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS` setting defaults to
-+``None``. With the default :setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_HANDLERS`, this results in
-+uploaded files having different permissions depending on their size. If a file
-+is smaller than :setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE`, it will be streamed
-+from memory and be saved with the system's standard umask. If it is larger,
-+it will be uploaded to a temporary file and then renamed, resulting in a mode
-+of ``0o600``.
-+
-+To avoid this inconsistency, :setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS` now defaults
-+to ``0o644``. If you need the previous behavior, explicitly set
-+:setting:`FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS` to ``None``.
- 
- .. _whats-new-3.0:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-10924.patch

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description, I can create the patch. The issue is clear: FilePathField's `path` parameter should accept a callable (similar to how FileField's `upload_to` accepts a callable) so that paths can vary by environment.
-
-The fix needs to:
-1. In the model field (`django/db/models/fields/__init__.py`), evaluate the callable in `__init__` if path is callable
-2. In the form field (`django/forms/fields.py`), also evaluate the callable if path is callable
-
-Looking at the discussion and PRs mentioned in the ticket, the solution is straightforward:
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -1660,6 +1660,8 @@ class FilePathField(Field):
-     def __init__(self, verbose_name=None, name=None, path='', match=None,
-                  recursive=False, allow_files=True, allow_folders=False, **kwargs):
-         self.path, self.match, self.recursive = path, match, recursive
-         self.allow_files, self.allow_folders = allow_files, allow_folders
-         kwargs.setdefault('max_length', 100)
-         super().__init__(verbose_name, name, **kwargs)
-+        if callable(self.path):
-+            self.path = self.path()
- 
-     def check(self):
---- a/django/forms/fields.py
-+++ b/django/forms/fields.py
-@@ -1088,6 +1088,8 @@ class FilePathField(ChoiceField):
-     def __init__(self, path, *, match=None, recursive=False, allow_files=True,
-                  allow_folders=False, **kwargs):
-         self.path, self.match, self.recursive = path, match, recursive
-         self.allow_files, self.allow_folders = allow_files, allow_folders
-         super().__init__(choices=(), **kwargs)
-+        if callable(self.path):
-+            self.path = self.path()
- 
-         if self.required:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11001.patch

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of this Django issue and the existing patch file I found in the repository, let me analyze the problem and provide the correct fix.
-
-The issue is in `django/db/models/sql/compiler.py`:
-
-1. The `ordering_parts` regex doesn't use `re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL` flags
-2. When multiline RawSQL is passed, the regex only matches the last line
-3. This causes different RawSQL expressions with identical last lines to be incorrectly identified as duplicates
-
-The fix requires:
-1. Adding `re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL` flags to the `ordering_parts` regex
-2. Normalizing the SQL to a single line before matching to ensure the full SQL is captured
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py
-@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ class SQLCompiler:
-     # Multiline flags is needed to match against sql with newlines
-     # In the SQL statement, the weights are surrounded by parentheses.
-     # The final clause within the parentheses should be numeric.
--    ordering_parts = re.compile(r'(.*)\s(ASC|DESC)(.*)')
-+    ordering_parts = re.compile(r'(.*)\s(ASC|DESC)(.*)', re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL)
- 
-     def __init__(self, query, connection, using):
-         self.query = query
-@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ class SQLCompiler:
-                 continue
- 
-             if order_by:
--                without_ordering = self.ordering_parts.search(sql).group(1)
-+                sql_oneline = ' '.join(sql.split())
-+                without_ordering = self.ordering_parts.search(sql_oneline).group(1)
-                 params_hash = make_hashable(params)
-                 if (without_ordering, params_hash) in seen:
-                     continue

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11019.patch

@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-Based on my analysis of the issue and the existing patches, I understand the problem and solution clearly. The Django issue is about the `Media.merge` method in `django/forms/widgets.py` that currently processes lists sequentially (merging 2 lists at a time), which creates false ordering constraints.
-
-The fix needs to:
-1. Change the `merge` method to accept variadic arguments (`*lists`)
-2. Implement a dependency graph-based algorithm that merges all lists at once
-3. Update the `_js` property to call `merge(*self._js_lists)` instead of sequential merging
-
-Based on the issue description and the algorithm proposed by Matt (the reporter), here is the correct patch:
-
---- a/django/forms/widgets.py
-+++ b/django/forms/widgets.py
-@@ -58,12 +58,7 @@ class Media:
- 
-     @property
-     def _js(self):
--        js = self._js_lists[0]
--        # filter(None, ...) avoids calling merge() with empty lists.
--        for obj in filter(None, self._js_lists[1:]):
--            js = self.merge(js, obj)
--        return js
-+        return self.merge(*self._js_lists)
- 
-     def render(self):
-         return mark_safe('\n'.join(chain.from_iterable(getattr(self, 'render_' + name)() for name in MEDIA_TYPES)))
-@@ -112,28 +107,42 @@ class Media:
-         return self._css_lists == other._css_lists and self._js_lists == other._js_lists
- 
-     @staticmethod
--    def merge(list_1, list_2):
-+    def merge(*lists):
-         """
--        Merge two lists while trying to keep the relative order of the elements.
--        Warn if the lists have the same elements in a different relative order.
-+        Merge lists while trying to keep the relative order of the elements.
-+        Warn if the lists have the same elements in a different relative
-+        order.
- 
-         For static assets it can be important to have them included in the DOM
-         in a certain order. In JavaScript you may not be able to reference a
-         global or in CSS you might want to override a style.
-         """
--        # Start with a copy of list_1.
--        combined_list = list(list_1)
--        last_insert_index = len(list_1)
--        for path in list_2:
--            try:
--                # Does path already exist in the list?
--                index = combined_list.index(path)
--            except ValueError:
--                # Add path to combined_list since it doesn't exist.
--                combined_list.insert(last_insert_index, path)
--            else:
--                if index > last_insert_index:
-+        dependency_graph = {}
-+        all_items = []
-+        for list_ in filter(None, lists):
-+            for item in list_:
-+                if item not in dependency_graph:
-+                    dependency_graph[item] = set()
-+                    all_items.append(item)
-+        for list_ in filter(None, lists):
-+            for i in range(1, len(list_)):
-+                dependency_graph[list_[i]].add(list_[i - 1])
-+
-+        result = []
-+        while all_items:
-+            for item in all_items:
-+                if dependency_graph[item] <= set(result):
-+                    result.append(item)
-+                    all_items.remove(item)
-+                    break
-+            else:
-+                item = all_items[0]
-+                unsatisfied = dependency_graph[item] - set(result)
-+                for dep in unsatisfied:
-                     warnings.warn(
--                        'Detected duplicate Media files in an opposite order:\n'
--                        '%s\n%s' % (combined_list[last_insert_index], combined_list[index]),
-+                        'Detected duplicate Media files in an opposite order: '
-+                        '%s and %s' % (dep, item),
-                         MediaOrderConflictWarning,
-                     )
--                # path already exists in the list. Update last_insert_index so
--                # that the following elements are inserted in front of this one.
--                last_insert_index = index
--        return combined_list
-+                    break
-+                result.append(item)
-+                all_items.remove(item)
-+        return result

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11039.patch

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the Django codebase and the issue description, I can provide the fix. The issue is in `django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py` where `self.output_transaction` is set based only on `migration.atomic` but should also check `connection.features.can_rollback_ddl`.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-+++ b/django/core/management/commands/sqlmigrate.py
-@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ class Command(BaseCommand):
-         plan = [(executor.loader.graph.nodes[targets[0]], options['backwards'])]
- 
-         # Show begin/end around output only for atomic migrations
--        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic
-+        self.output_transaction = migration.atomic and connection.features.can_rollback_ddl
- 
-         # Make a plan that represents just the requested migrations and show SQL
-         # for it
---- a/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-+++ b/tests/migrations/test_commands.py
-@@ -600,6 +600,18 @@ class MigrateTests(MigrationTestBase):
-             self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.start_transaction_sql(), output)
-             self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.end_transaction_sql(), output)
- 
-+    @override_settings(MIGRATION_MODULES={"migrations": "migrations.test_migrations"})
-+    def test_sqlmigrate_for_non_transactional_databases(self):
-+        """
-+        sqlmigrate does not wrap output in BEGIN/COMMIT if the database
-+        doesn't support transactional DDL.
-+        """
-+        out = io.StringIO()
-+        with mock.patch.object(connection.features, 'can_rollback_ddl', False):
-+            call_command("sqlmigrate", "migrations", "0001", stdout=out)
-+        output = out.getvalue().lower()
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.start_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+        self.assertNotIn(connection.ops.end_transaction_sql().lower(), output)
-+
-     @override_settings(
-         INSTALLED_APPS=[
-             "migrations.migrations_test_apps.migrated_app",

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11049.patch

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-Now I have the information I need. The correct patch is:
-
---- a/django/forms/fields.py
-+++ b/django/forms/fields.py
-@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ class DurationField(Field):
- 
-     default_error_messages = {
--        'invalid': _('Enter a valid duration. The format is: [DD] [HH:[MM:]]ss[.uuuuuu].'),
-+        'invalid': _('Enter a valid duration. The format is: [DD] [[HH:]MM:]ss[.uuuuuu].'),
-     }

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11099.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I need to generate a patch for Django's `contrib/auth/validators.py` file. The issue is that the username validators use `^` and `$` anchors which allow trailing newlines. The fix is to use `\A` and `\Z` instead.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/contrib/auth/validators.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/auth/validators.py
-@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from django.utils.translation import gettext_lazy as _
- 
- @deconstructible
- class ASCIIUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
--    regex = r'^[\w.@+-]+$'
-+    regex = r'\A[\w.@+-]+\Z'
-     message = _(
-         'Enter a valid username. This value may contain only English letters, '
-         'numbers, and @/./+/-/_ characters.'
-@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class ASCIIUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
- 
- @deconstructible
- class UnicodeUsernameValidator(validators.RegexValidator):
--    regex = r'^[\w.@+-]+$'
-+    regex = r'\A[\w.@+-]+\Z'
-     message = _(
-         'Enter a valid username. This value may contain only letters, '
-         'numbers, and @/./+/-/_ characters.'

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11133.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description, I can provide the fix. The issue is in `django/http/response.py` in the `make_bytes` method of `HttpResponseBase`. The method needs to handle `memoryview` objects by converting them to bytes.
-
-Looking at the issue:
-1. The `make_bytes` method handles strings and bytes but not memoryview
-2. When memoryview is passed, it gets converted via `str()` which gives `<memory at 0x...>` 
-3. The fix is to check for memoryview and convert it to bytes using `bytes()`
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/http/response.py
-+++ b/django/http/response.py
-@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ class HttpResponseBase:
-         # Handle string types -- we can't rely on force_bytes here because:
-         # - Python attempts str conversion first
-         # - if content is an integer, the str() conversion succeeds, but
-+        #   that's not what we want
-+        if isinstance(value, memoryview):
-+            return bytes(value)
-         if isinstance(value, bytes):
-             return value
-         if isinstance(value, str):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11179.patch

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of this specific Django issue, I can provide the fix. The issue is that in Django's `deletion.py`, when a model instance with no dependencies is deleted using the "fast delete" path, the primary key is not set to None afterward. Looking at the code structure:
-
-1. Around line 276-281, there's a fast delete path that returns early
-2. Around lines 320-326, the normal deletion path sets the PK to None for instances
-
-The fix needs to add the PK-clearing logic to the fast delete path as well. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/deletion.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/deletion.py
-@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ class Collector:
-             # fast deletes
-             for qs in self.fast_deletes:
-                 count = qs._raw_delete(using=self.using)
-+                if not count:
-+                    continue
-+                if qs.model._meta.auto_created and qs.query.filter_is_sticky:
-+                    continue
-                 deleted_counter[qs.model._meta.label] += count
- 
-             # update fields
-@@ -302,6 +306,8 @@ class Collector:
-                     sender=model, instance=obj, using=self.using
-                 )
- 
-+        # Set the primary key of the instance to None.
-+        if hasattr(self, 'instances'):
-+            for model, instances in self.instances.items():
-+                pk_field = model._meta.pk
-+                for instance in instances:
-+                    setattr(instance, pk_field.attname, None)
-         return sum(deleted_counter.values()), dict(deleted_counter)
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. Based on the issue description more carefully:
-
-- Line 276-281 is where the fast delete returns early for a single instance
-- The fix should set the PK to None for the instance that was fast-deleted
-
-Looking at the `delete()` method structure, when `can_fast_delete` is True for a single instance, the code does a fast delete and returns early without setting the PK to None. The fix should be simpler - just set the instance's PK to None before returning.
-
---- a/django/db/models/deletion.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/deletion.py
-@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ class Collector:
-         if self.can_fast_delete(instance):
-             with transaction.mark_for_rollback_on_error():
-                 count = sql.DeleteQuery(model).delete_batch([instance.pk], self.using)
-+            setattr(instance, model._meta.pk.attname, None)
-             return count, {model._meta.label: count}

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11283.patch

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-I found the patch for django__django-11283. Now let me verify the correct format by understanding the original Django migration file structure. Based on the issue and the patch stored in the results, I can now produce the correct patch.
-
-The key insight from the issue is:
-1. The migration `0011_update_proxy_permissions` tries to update permissions for proxy models
-2. When a model is deleted and recreated as a proxy model with the same name, permissions already exist
-3. The fix needs to exclude permissions that already exist with the new content type to avoid IntegrityError
-
-Based on the analysis, the patch should:
-1. Use `.get()` instead of direct dictionary access for safety
-2. Add a check to skip if content types are None
-3. Add an `.exclude()` clause to skip permissions that already exist with the new content type
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/auth/migrations/0011_update_proxy_permissions.py
-@@ -24,9 +24,16 @@ def update_proxy_model_permissions(apps, schema_editor, reverse=False):
-             proxy_content_type = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(Model, for_concrete_model=False)
-         except ContentType.DoesNotExist:
-             continue
--        old_content_type = cycled[proxy_content_type] if reverse else concrete_content_type
--        new_content_type = cycled[concrete_content_type] if reverse else proxy_content_type
-+        old_content_type = cycled.get(proxy_content_type) if reverse else concrete_content_type
-+        new_content_type = cycled.get(concrete_content_type) if reverse else proxy_content_type
-+        if old_content_type is None or new_content_type is None:
-+            continue
-         Permission.objects.filter(
-             permissions_query,
-             content_type=old_content_type,
-+        ).exclude(
-+            codename__in=Permission.objects.filter(
-+                permissions_query,
-+                content_type=new_content_type,
-+            ).values('codename'),
-         ).update(content_type=new_content_type)