universal-physics-tensor 7.0.0 → 9.0.0

package/data/confrontation-sources.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+# Confrontation sources
+
+The recorded statements below are the verbatim support cited by catalog confrontations.
+
+figure (Fig 3), so there is no clean tabulated pair, and this module encodes
+
+observed_ratio: 1.0,
+
+tolerance: DECOHERENCE_EXPERIMENTAL_TOLERANCE,
+
+our calculation, which contains no adjustable parameters, agrees well
+
+observed_ratio: 1,
+
+relative_uncertainty: 8.6e-11,
+
+Post-2019 SI fixes h and e exactly, so R_K = h/e² is exact BY DEFINITION and
+
+require finite-conductivity/surface-roughness/temperature/electrostatic-patch corrections
+
+corrected theory to ~1% at the smallest separation
+
+agreement: 0.01,
+
+const predicted_k_B = K_B_CODATA_2014;
+
+resistance traceable to the quantum Hall effect (BE-55), temperature to acoustic/ITS-90 thermometry, both independent of the noise relation
+
+Conservative 1e-9 bound; the best comparisons reach ~1e-10 to 1e-11.
+
+K_J = 2e/h is exact by the SI, so confronting its value is circular.
+
+High-mobility samples confirm the fractional quantization to ~1e-5; conservative bound
+
+Non-circular: no single-particle theory predicts the 1/3.
+
+L_measured: LORENZ_NUMBER_SI, // degenerate limit recovers L₀
+
+Real metals deviate — Cu@0°C ~2.23e-8 (~9% low)
+
+The ~10% bound covers the material spread
+
+const predicted_L0 = LORENZ_NUMBER_SI;
+
+L_measured: LORENZ_NUMBER_SI,
+
+ratio_measured: 3.5, // Sn, weak-coupling
+
+Real conventional superconductors range from a little below 3.5 (Al) to
+
+agreement: 0.05,
+
+export const BCS_GAP_RATIO = (2 * Math.PI) / Math.exp(EULER_GAMMA);
+
+mass (~1.35 M_⊙, the highest reliably measured)
+
+M_observed_solar: 1.35,
+
+2006gz/2007if/2009dc) imply progenitor masses up to 2.4–2.8 M_⊙ via rotation
+
+agreement: 0.12,
+
+evaluateChandrasekharMass({ mu_e: 2 })
+
+Math.pow((HBAR_SI * C_SI) / G_SI, 1.5) * Math.pow(mu_e * M_U_SI, -2)
+
+export interface EddingtonRatioObservation {
+
+The brightest sub-Eddington accretors saturate near L/L_Edd ≈ 1; the broad
+
+agreement: 0.5,
+
+Dense core-forming conditions (T=10 K, ρ≈3.8×10⁻¹⁶ kg/m³ ~ 10⁵ cm⁻³ of H₂,
+
+(At cloud-AVERAGE density M_J is tens of M_⊙ — the well-known "Jeans mass
+
+agreement: 1.5,
+
+export const MOLECULAR_CLOUD_FRAGMENT: CloudFragmentObservation = {
+
+evaluateJeansMass({ T_K: obs.T_K, rho_kg_per_m3: obs.rho_kg_per_m3, mu: obs.mu })
+
+Bayesian eta/s extraction from RHIC/LHC heavy-ion flow observables
+
+eta/s is temperature-dependent; the extracted minimum near T_c spans ~0.08-0.15 (hbar/k_B units) across analyses, representative ~0.10.
+
+observed_eta_over_s: 0.1,
+
+INDEPENDENT hydrodynamic extraction (flow observables), not a recompute of 1/(4pi).
+
+experimental average over liquid-vapor / binary-fluid critical points
+
+were deliberately NOT used for the observed slot
+
+INDEPENDENT determination (real critical systems), not a recompute of the bootstrap.
+
+Delta_epsilon = 1.412625(10)
+
+ρ = m* / (n e² τ), into a Planckian scattering coefficient α defined by
+
+The per-material α table from Legros et al. was NOT reproduced here:
+
+α = 1.0 ± 0.4 (i.e., α is O(1), within roughly a factor of 2 of the
+
+NOT claimed: that UPT/SYK *predicts* α (BE-23 bundles α_SYK as a
+
+with the paper's CONSERVATIVE lower distance bound D = 26 Mpc
+
+(attributes the whole observed
+
+(assumes a 10 s intrinsic EM
+
+Canonical GW170817 upper bound on |Δv|/c.
+
+so the predicted PPN gamma is exactly 1
+
+const predicted_gamma = 1;
+
+LISA-Pathfinder data Armano et al. 2016
+
+λ ≤ 2.96×10⁻⁸ s⁻¹ (r_C = 100 nm)
+
+MODEL CAVEAT: GRW and CSL are related-but-distinct collapse models; this
+
+γ − 1 = (−0.8 ± 1.2)×10⁻⁴
+
+const scaling = (1 + obs.observed_gamma) / 2;
+
+const observed_sigma_arcsec = (obs.observed_gamma_sigma / 2) * predicted_arcsec;
+
+const observed_arcsec = scaling * predicted_arcsec;
+
+const SOLAR_RADIUS_M = 6.957e8;
+
+precession — the residual left after subtracting the Newtonian planetary
+
+Measured ANOMALOUS perihelion advance (″/Julian century) — the GR residual.